ML12261A164
| ML12261A164 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Indian Point  |
| Issue date: | 09/13/2012 |
| From: | Catherine Scott - No Known Affiliation |
| To: | NRC/SECY/RAS |
| SECY RAS | |
| References | |
| 50-247-LR, 50-286-LR, RAS E-1028, ASLBP 07-858-03-LR-BD01 | |
| Download: ML12261A164 (1) | |
Text
Docket, Hearing 1-A _
F
-10 2 From:
cathytscoft@main.nc.us Sent:
Thursday, September 13, 2012 10:38 AM To:
Docket, Hearing I am one of thousands of Americans who want a secure energy future for this country, and do NOT want it to be based on nuclear power.
There are alternative sources of energy that demand our attention, the country's best research efforts and a commitment of funding. These include wind, solar, hydro, biofuels.
They do not includes practices that PUT PEOPLE AT RISK IN UNACCEPTABLE WAYS, which would include nuclear energy, continued reliance on coal, and fracking for natural gas.
NO! to Indian Point.
I see that not all employees are writing to you in support of the plant.
"Indian Point's new perimeter security system crashes regularly and the nuclear power plant routinely fails anti-terrorism drills, a security lieutenant at the plant claims in a $1.52 billion lawsuit.
Clifton "'Skip" Travis Jr. is suing plant owner Entergy, claiming that its emphasis on profits over security led to the installation of the new monitoring system without adequate training.
He said he has been kept out of work for months because of his criticism of the company's handling of security issues, including complaints to state and federal officials."
From lohud.com, September 13, 2012 Thank you for taking comments.
Sincerely, Cathy T. Scott 53 Mount Olive Church Road Asheville NC 28804 What sets us apart from other species is culture, and what is culture but forbearance?
Michael Pollan DOCKETED USNRC September 13, 2012 (10:38 a.m.)
OFFICE OF SECRETARY RULEMAKINGS AND ADJUDICATIONS STAFF 1V