ML12261A150

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Limited Appearance Statement of Aidan Oreilly Opposing Indian Point, Units 2 and 3 License Renewal Application
ML12261A150
Person / Time
Site: Indian Point  Entergy icon.png
Issue date: 09/13/2012
From: O'Reilly A
- No Known Affiliation
To:
NRC/SECY/RAS
SECY RAS
References
50-247-LR, 50-286-LR, ASLBP 07-858-03-LR-BD01, RAS E-1014
Download: ML12261A150 (2)


Text

Docket, Hearing

/

E.-/*I From:

Aidan OReilly [oreillyaidan@hotmail.com]

Sent:

Thursday, September 13, 2012 12:30 PM To:

Docket, Hearing Cc:

Siarnacki, Anne

Subject:

Indian Point - not safe Office of the Secretary, Rulemakings and Adjudications Staff, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC 20555-0001 Fax: (301) 415-1101 Email: hearinci.docket(,nrc.,ov.

I am writing to urge the Nuclear Regulatory Commission to deny Entergy's application for a 20-year license extension for the two operating nuclear reactors, IP-2 and IP-3, at Indian Point Energy Facility in Buchanan, NY.

Indian Point is approximately 20 mile from my home in Hackensack NJ.

Indian Point is located in the most densely populated region of the country and identified as one of the most dangerous nuclear plants in the nation, according to the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) itself. Over the years we have witnessed serious nuclear accidents at Chernobyl and Three Mile Island, and most recently at Fukushima. In August 2011, New York experienced the effects of an earthquake, Hurricane Irene, and a tornado all in one week. It is no longer prudent to believe that "It can't happen here."

There are many factors that make Indian Point's relicensing flawed, and make denying it imperative, including:

Dangerously over-crowded fuel pools: The plant's spent fuel is highly radioactive and contains about three times the radioactivity as Fukushima's spent fuel pools. Spent fuel assemblies are densely packed into severely over-crowded fuel pools that are housed in totally unprotected metal storage buildings and leaking radioactivity into the Hudson.

On-Site Waste Storage: When the plant was first licensed, it was widely believed that the federal government would open a national waste depository at Yucca Mountain. That option is no longer under consideration and there is no other repository on the horizon. Indian Point is now storing 1,500 tons of highly-radioactive spent nuclear waste on-site, and would add an additional 1,000 tonsif the plant is relicensed for another 20 years.

Evacuation is Impossible: Even if the possibility of an earthquake, a terrorist attack, or a fuel pool fire or other accident at Indian Point is remote, the consequences of a serious problem at Indian Pont would be devastating. Approximately 20 million people live or work within 50 miles of Indian Point and there is no evacuation plan for New York City. Within minutes of an accident or incident at Indian Point, gridlock would occur making evacuation impossible.

To relicense Indian Point in its present location and condition defies logic. To do so is playing a dangerous game of Russian roulette with our lives and future, when safer, cleaner alternatives are immediately available.

Thank you for considering these comments.

DOCKETED Sincerely, USNRC Aidan O'Reilly September 13, 2012 (12:30 p.m.)

OFFICE OF SECRETARY RULEMAKINGS AND cc:

ADJUDICATIONS STAFF Administrative Judge Lawrence G. McDade c/o Anne Siarnacki, Law Clerk Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Panel, Mail Stop T-3F23

,U.S. tIclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC 20555-0001