ML12234A403
| ML12234A403 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Palisades  |
| Issue date: | 08/14/2012 |
| From: | Tom Gurdziel - No Known Affiliation |
| To: | Macfarlane A NRC/Chairman |
| Craver, Patti NRR/PMDA | |
| References | |
| LTR-12-0448 | |
| Download: ML12234A403 (2) | |
Text
iA OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY CORRESPONDENCE CONTROL TICKET Date Printed: Aug 17, 2012 14:28 PAPER NUMBER:
ACTION OFFICE:
12-0448 LOGGING DATE: 08/15/2012 Týqý Ks([
AUTHOR:
AFFILIATION:
Tom Gurdziel Chairman Resource Concerns Retracted Events Reports - 48018 on 8-8-2012 c~ 'EDODEDMRT DEDR DEDCM AO ADDRESSEE:
SUBJECT:
ACTION:
DISTRIBUTION:
LETTER DATE:
ACKNOWLEDGED SPECIAL HANDLING:
NOTES:
FILE LOCATION:
Appropriate 08/14/2012 No ADAMS DATE DUE:
DATE SIGNED:
-hty~cuAe,
~.-
SG -(o i
oF Joosten, Sandy From:
Tom Gurdziel [tgurdziel@twcny~rr.com]
Sent:
Tuesday, August 14, 2012 10:02 PM To:
CHAIRMAN Resource Cc:
Giessner, John; hillsc@INPO.org; Bridget. Frymire@dps.ny.gov; Uldis.Vanags@state.vt.us; Screnci, Diane; newal@goinfo.com; thenry@theblade.com
Subject:
Retracted Event Reports, Such as 48018 on 8-8-2012 Good morning Jack, Once any Event Report is written, it is my opinion that retractions should not be accepted. The most recent example is the Entergy/Palisades "retraction" of a report of leaking borated water, (not Event Number 48182). Wouldn't it make more sense to use resources to find the leak, (or leaks), rather than find "reasons" why the report should not have been written?
I am asking you to consider a submitted Event Report "retraction" as one clear indication of the current safety culture being sub-standard.
(Note that Entergy/Palisades Event Reports 48018 and 48182 both report borated water leaks.)
Thank you, Tom Gurdziel I