ML12213A363

E-mail from R. Auluck to D. Hills, Et Al, Subject: Davis Besse Shield Building - License Renewal

ML12213A363
Person / Time
Site:	Davis Besse
Issue date:	01/17/2012
From:	Rajender Auluck NRC/NRR/DLR/RAPB
To:	Dave Hills, James Neurauter NRC/RGN-III/DRS/EB1
References
FOIA/PA-2012-0121
Download: ML12213A363 (5)

Text

Murphy, Martin From: Auluck, Rajender I Sent: Tuesday, January 17, 2012 3:41 PM To: Hills, David; Neurauter, James Cc: Holmberg, Mel; Sanchez Santiago, Elba; Shaikh, Atif; Stone, AnnMarie; Jose, Benny; CuadradoDeJesus, Samuel; Sheikh, Abdul; Morey, Dennis, Bozga, John; Meghani, Vijay; Murphy, Martin

Subject:

RE: Davis Besse Shield Building - License Renewal

Dave, License renewal will be very much interested in following their root cause analysis and long term monitoring programs.

At present these issues are in Part 50 space and we will coordinate our activities through NRR/DE staff. Under license renewal, we already have a RAI requesting specific information and are waiting for their response. I understand that license renewal PM is arranging a conference call later this week to discuss questions raised in your e-mail below.

Thanks, Raj From: Hills, David Sent: Tuesday, January 17, 2012 1:17 PM To: Neurauter, James Cc: Holmberg, Mel; Sanchez Santiago, Elba; Shaikh, Atif; Stone, AnnMarie; Jose, Benny; CuadradoDeJesus, Samuel; Auluck, Rajender; Sheikh, Abdul; Morey, Dennis; Bozga, John; Meghani, Vijay; Murphy, Martin

Subject:

Davis Besse Shield Building - License Renewal

Jim, That does bring up a good question. Region III currently has two concurrent ongoing Davis Besse shield building follow-up inspection activities:

1. Davis Besse Shield Building Operability I Licensing Basis Inspection led by Jim Neurauter. We have completed the first part of this inspection (made a conclusion with the assistance of NRR that the building is currently operable and including issuing a Confirmatory Action Letter to address continued operabililty in the short term while awaiting completion of the root cause analysis) and the second part (does the building in its current condition meet all licensing basis requirements) is ongoing. We expect to exit on this inspection around the end of January, likely resulting in an unresolved item and associated TIA to NRR to resolve the second portion of the inspection.

2. Davis Besse Shield Building Root Cause & Corrective Actions led by Mel Holmberg. This inspection is ongoing and currently focused on observing and evaluating licensee in process root cause activities.

The licensee owes us a root cause report and corrective action plan (including long term monitoring program) by the end of February. Our inspection team is lined up to return to the site quickly thereafter (the week of March 12) to focus on licensee conclusions and plans going forward.

Abdul Sheikh from the Division of License Renewal was actually on our inspection team for the operability question and helped considerably, as did other structural engineers in NRR, in our reaching our current operability conclusion.

Obviously though, the above activities (especially theroot cause inspection) will continue to have considerable outside interest from a license renewal aspect. In fact, what the licensee proposes with respect to long term monitoring, I think, may feed directly into license renewal, and hence, when we make a decision regarding the adequacy of corrective actions, I think the Division of License Renewal should be involved. What kind of interface should we establish with the Division of License Renewal as we progress through this? Do they want a representative on our root cause inspection 1

team? Do they want to participate in our team's weekly status calls with the licensee's root cause team? Are there any specific aspects, the Division of License Renewal wants our inspection team to focus on? And how does this fit in with our license renewal inspection activities under the control of Ann Marie Stone? How does the Division of License Renewal plan to address this issue in the proceedings? What kind of support will they want from us?

Perhaps, a conference call might be in order to hammer this out with the various parties?

- Dave From: Neurauter, James Sent: Tuesday, January 17, 2012 9:23 AM To: CuadradoDeJesus, Samuel Cc: Hills, David; Holmberg, Mel; Sanchez Santiago, Elba; Shaikh, Atif; Stone, AnnMarie; Jose, Benny

Subject:

RE: Davis-Besse Hearing File Samuel Please clarify what Davis-Besse emails need to be captured in Hearing File.

Region III has ongoing inspection related to design basis of Davis-Besse shield building.

Region III has inspection planned in March for review of licensee's root cause evaluation related to identified shield building laminar cracking.

Should emails for these activities be captured in Hearing File?

Also, should license renewal staff be cc'd on emails for above activities? If yes, please provide list.

Thanks Jim From: CuadradoDeJesus, Samuel Sent: Friday, January 13, 2012 10:02 AM To: Sheikh, Abdul; Lehman, Bryce; Buford, Angela; Rogers, Billy; Holston, William; Kichline, Michelle; Klos, John; Wise, John; Min, Seung; Yee, On; Homiack, Matthew; Ng, Ching; Sun, Robert; Kalikian, Roger; Hunt, Christopher; Obodoako, Aloysius; Karwoski, Kenneth; Wong, Emma; Sydnor, Christopher; Tsao, John; Collins, Jay; Iqbal, Naeem; Neurauter, James; Jose, Benny; Holmberg, Mel; Sanchez Santiago, Elba; Harris, Brian; Istar, Ata; Prinaris, Andrew; Doutt, Clifford; Hoang, Dan; Nguyen, Duc; Erickson, Alice; Poehler, Jeffrey; Cheruvenki, Ganesh; Sheng, Simon; Cameron, Jamnes; Kimble, Daniel; Mahoney, Michael; Fairbanks, Carolyn Cc: Morey, Dennis; Pham, Bo; Pelton, David; Auluck, Rajender; Gonzalez, Hipolito; Klein, Alex; Stone, AnnMarie; Davis-BesseHearingFile Resource

Subject:

Davis-Besse Hearing File Importance: High This request is being sent to all staff that is/has worked on the Davis-Besse LR review process. The purpose is to capture all pertinent E-mails previously sent or received by the staff, which may need to be preserved for the Hearing File.

This request applies to contractors as well. Any E-mails sent to you by the contractor count as though they were generated by'the staff. To capture E-mails sent by contractors, follow the instructions below 2

for "Option 1: E-mails previously sent or received." (This action should be completed by the staff member who received the email from the contractor directly). For contractors, E-mails sent between contractors must also be captured even if the staff did not receive the email originally. Please coordinate with contractor counterparts, to ensure that they are capturing and timely forwarding emails which may need to be preserved for the Hearing File.

Directions for Email Capture:

Option 1: E-mails previously sent (your "Sent" box) or received (your "Inbox"):

1. For single E-mails: Open E-mail and send using the "Forward as Attachment" option, which is not in the right-click drop-down menu, but can be selected from the "Other Actions" menu in Outlook.

You can also alternatively use [Ctrl+Alt+F Ot~

~

To ~ D-," ~ie-;0

~~ ci'u r67 ý i: H~

Sub 7WNMPk ~

ffI Paula E. Cooper Proj ec Nftuirge2- ~'Y usa~onL~~

I1~

IQk T 11

-or-For multiple E-mails: Highlight the E-mails you want to send, then use the Forward as attachment command; alternatively, you may simply open a new E-mail, then drag and drop the E-mails you wish to send to the hearing file into that new E-mail.

3

f5W 1 c). ,1tl ,,p ajdd __1 4_***.*

t*

,.dJ Sent

• ooo

• - _oo** o, ....... ,*__

• TO.'Do80 5c-r June 20:1 S md . wt r F SeN Derrs 32 13 4 35 I ý JI -*

i9 0 71, 22 23 2ý4 T,2 M6 27 231,13 0' 9 Qpau!rm

Ž~trw~ Ma VS rn~

iboX

'I Sem. "

v,9-m plh(0fASRte maSli'~d raý( s Adb AvpMnOIj iiI7~ ~ I to I 145CMin lent, yne~,

531 5 WI(r; Art I,,, 1ý,Orý

2. Address to be sent to is: Davis-BesseHearinqFile.Resource(,nrc..qov

3. The text "<A E>" needs to be inserted at the end of the subject line.

4

/~~W 1,ladr.

Chrlo V

~enci SI iii Subject; FW: T~5t oz$ubts(

At4tache. 7iet A nnP~S xB I - -

.... ..... .

I I-Op~~s~ rormst e A

L-:: r 77,

'Ii 2 D~. -~s~H~ nOF ~ 1________________________________________________________

Scnd I 1 ___________

Su!,lect IFWAI Test NonýPutil ik ýQ II _________

Attached: I;J'Tost N.n--NDIk Q~ E51

4. When sending multiple E-mails together, Limit to no more than 25 attachments per forwarding (carrier) E-mail.

5. Processed E-mails will end up as Official Agency Record in the appropriate ADAMS folders (they will be automatically profiled):

1. Main Library/STAFF HEARING FILES/Davis-Besse/OGC Not Reviewed/Publicly Available

2. Main Library/STAFF HEARING FILES/Davis-Besse/OGC Not Reviewed/Non-Publicly Available Option 2: E-mails that are sent from now on:

1. Add the address: Davis-BesseHearingFile.Resource(anrc..qov in the cc: field of the email.

• • • If this step is forgotten for any emails, complete steps for "Option 1: Emails previously sent" Your time on this effort should be charged to the following TACs - ME5758

Regards, Samuel Cuadrado de Jesus Project Manager Projects Branch 1 Division of License Renewal U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Phone: 301-415-2946 Samuel.CuadradoDeJesus@nrc.gov 5