ML12208A091
| ML12208A091 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Summer  |
| Issue date: | 07/19/2012 |
| From: | Reese S South Carolina Electric & Gas Co |
| To: | Rulemaking, Directives, and Editing Branch |
| References | |
| 77fr36583 00002, NRC-2012-0133-0001 | |
| Download: ML12208A091 (1) | |
Text
Page 1 of 1 As of: July 24, 2012 Received: July 19, 2012 PUBLIC SUBMISSION Status: PendingPost PUBLC SBMISIONTracking No. 810a5184 Comments Due: July 20, 2012 Submission Type: Web Docket: NRC-2012-0133 NRC Form 5, "Occupational Dose Record for a Monitoring Period" Comment On: NRC-2012-0133-0001 NRC Form 5, Occupational Dose Record for a Monitoring Period Document: NRC-2012-0133-DRAFT-0002 Comment on FR Doc # 2012-14872 (I.,
C, f~~f 1 Cr3 C)
Submitter Information Name: Susan Reese 7 "7 fFR3K.
Address:
P. 0. Box 88 MC 830 Jenkinsville, SC, 29065 Organization: South Carolina Electric & Gas Company/V. C. Summer Nuclear Station General Comment
-Layout of the proposed draft layout of NRC Form 5 No issues with the proposed layout of the new form.
-Estimated economic costs associated with modifying information technology (IT) systems to include EDEX field.
A total upgrade to the exposure tracking software would be required. The current version does not support this form and EDEX field. The estimated cost would be approximately $50,000.
-Estimated DOSE SAVINGS (not economic savings as incorrectly annotated in the Federal Register Notice - clarification received from NRC) associated with calculating EDEX for certain occupational employees.
EDEX has limited application but has the potential for significant dose savings with certain types of work; otherwise VCSNS does not expect much impact on dose savings from normal operations or refueling outages.
-Clarity of the instructions provided for completing the proposed draft NRC Form 5, specifically concerning the use of EDEX and new directions for blocks 1 A and 1 lB.
The instructions for block I1 a where it states " and the EDEX component estimated by the DDE..."
needs clarification. The term "estimated" lends to confusion because of its application in Block 9A.
Including examples for blocks 1 IA and 11LB in a separate guide could be beneficial.
-Other options, information or considerations.
Standard training and communication materials for all radiological workers and more detailed training with examples for radiation protection personnel would be beneficial.
-U https://www.fdms.gov/fdms-web-agency/component/contentstreamer?obj ectld=09000064... 07/24/2012