Riverkeeper Pre-Filed Evidentiary Hearing Exhibit RIV000109, Official Transcript of Proceedings, Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Entergy Nuclear Vermont Yankee, 50-271-LR; ASLBP No. 06-849-03-LR, Newfane, Vermont, Pgs 1451-1741 (July 24, 200ML12181A368 |
Person / Time |
---|
Site: |
Indian Point ![Entergy icon.png](/w/images/7/79/Entergy_icon.png) |
---|
Issue date: |
06/29/2012 |
---|
From: |
Riverkeeper |
---|
To: |
Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Panel |
---|
SECY RAS |
Shared Package |
---|
ML12181A367 |
List: |
---|
References |
---|
RAS 22866, 50-247-LR, 50-286-LR, ASLBP 07-858-03-LR-BD01 |
Download: ML12181A368 (5) |
|
|
---|
Category:Legal-Pre-Filed Exhibits
MONTHYEARML16081A3252016-03-21021 March 2016 NRCR12001 - NRC Staff Prefiled Hearing Exhibit List (Revised) ML16078A4172016-03-18018 March 2016 ENTR20726 - Entergy Track 2 Exhibit List ML16078A4122016-03-18018 March 2016 NRC000236 - Crack Growth Rate Comparison - Eason Pathania Model to MRP Model- Excel Spreadsheet ML16078A4132016-03-18018 March 2016 NRCR11001 - Exhibt List NRC Staff Prefiled Hearing Exhibit List (Revised) ML15321A0352015-11-17017 November 2015 NYS000582 - Diagram of Strength Vs Amplitude by Dr. Richard T. Lahey ML15315A0132015-11-11011 November 2015 ENTR00726 - Track 2 Hearing Exhibit List ML15309A1292015-11-0505 November 2015 ENT000726 - Entergy Track 2 Hearing Exhibit List ML15309A1712015-11-0505 November 2015 RIVR14001 - Riverkeeper Tailored Track 2 Exhibit List ML15309A2212015-11-0505 November 2015 NRCR10001 - NRC Staff Track 2 Exhibit List ML15309A1552015-11-0404 November 2015 NYSR25001 - NYS Revised Tailored Exhibits List Relevant to Track 2 Contentions ML15313A4602015-11-0404 November 2015 NYSR25001 - Corrected Page 24 to Exhibits List Relevant to Track 2 Contentions ML15307A1152015-11-0303 November 2015 NYSR24001 - State of Ny Revised Hearing Exhibits List ML15307A8112015-11-0303 November 2015 NRC000230 - Corrections to Prefiled Testimony NRC000168 and NRC000197 ML15302A4672015-10-29029 October 2015 ENTR16001 - Entergy Revised Exhibit List ML15252A4442015-09-0909 September 2015 NYS000563 - Pressurized Water Reactor (PWR) Systems, USNRC Technical Training Center, Reactor Concepts Manual, Pages 4-1 to 4-28 ML15252A4432015-09-0909 September 2015 NYS000566 - Figure 1 for Supplemental Reply Testimony of Dr. Richard T. Lahey ML15252A5042015-09-0909 September 2015 NYS000568 - Supplemental Reply Statement of Position of the State of New York in Support of Contention NYS-25 (Public, Redacted) (September 9, 2015) ML15252A5062015-09-0909 September 2015 NYS000570 - Supplemental Reply Statement of Position of the State of New York and Riverkeeper, Inc. in Support of Contention NYS-26B/RK-TC-1B (Public, Redacted) (September 9, 2015) ML15252A5092015-09-0909 September 2015 RIV000164 - NUREG-1740, ACRS, Voltage-Based Alternative Repair Criteria: a Report to the Advisory Committee on Reactor Safeguards by the Ad Hoc Subcommittee on a Differing Professional Opinion (2001) ML15252A5112015-09-0909 September 2015 RIVR13001 - Riverkeeper Updated Exhibit List ML15252A5752015-09-0909 September 2015 NYS000573 - Supplemental Reply Statement of Position of the State of New York and Riverkeeper, Inc. in Support of Contention NYS-38/RK-TC-5 (Public, Redacted) (September 9, 2015) ML15252A5792015-09-0909 September 2015 NYS Updated Exhibit List ML15261A8302015-09-0404 September 2015 ENTR00615 - Entergy'S Statement of Position Re Contention NYS-25 (Embrittlement) - Redacted ML15222A9152015-08-10010 August 2015 ENT000648 - M. Mitchell, Chief, Vessels and Internals Integrity Branch, Response to Non-Concurrence Regarding Safety Evaluation for Topical Report MRP-227, Pressurized Water Reactor Internals Inspection and Evaluation Guidelines (Undated) ML15223A4512015-08-10010 August 2015 NRC000206 - Indian Point, Unit 2, Updated Final Safety Analysis Report (Ufsar), Rev. 25, Chapter 14 - Safety Analysis (2014) ML15223A4542015-08-10010 August 2015 NRC000207 - Regulatory Information Conference Presentation Slides, Recent Materials Inspections of PWR Reactor Internals (Mar. 2015) ML15223A4502015-08-10010 August 2015 NRC000205 - Indian Point, Unit 2, Updated Final Safety Analysis Report (Ufsar), Rev. 25, Chapter 3 - Reactor (2014) ML15223A3932015-08-10010 August 2015 NRCR00104 - on Yee Statement of Professional Qualifications (Revised) ML15223A3912015-08-10010 August 2015 NRCR00105 - Ching Ng Statement of Professional Qualifications (Revised) ML15222A8212015-08-10010 August 2015 ENT000617 - Curriculum Vitae of Timothy J. Griesbach ML15223A6712015-08-10010 August 2015 NRCR00147- NRC Staff'S Revised Statement of Position on State of New York and Riverkeeper'S Joint Contention NYS-38/RK-TC5 (Revised) ML15223A6752015-08-10010 August 2015 NRC000227 - Gary Stevens Statement of Professional Qualifications ML15222A8222015-08-10010 August 2015 ENT000618 - Curriculum Vitae of Randy G. Lott ML15223A7022015-08-10010 August 2015 NRCR900001 - NRC Staff Pre-filed Hearing Exhibit List (Revised) ML15222A8252015-08-10010 August 2015 ENT000629 - Letter from C. Grimes, NRC, to D. Walters, NEI, License Renewal Issue No. 98-0030 Thermal Aging Embrittlement of Cast Austenitic Stainless Steel Components (May 19, 2000) ML15222A8302015-08-10010 August 2015 ENT000634 - Entergy, IP2, FSAR Update, Revision 25 (2014) (Excerpts) ML15223A7792015-08-10010 August 2015 NRC000224 - IP3 FSAR Rev. 04 Chapter 16 ML15223A7812015-08-10010 August 2015 NRC000226 - Jeffrey C. Poehler Statement of Professional Qualifications ML15223A7832015-08-10010 August 2015 NRC000228 - Indian Point Unit 2 Technical Specifications 3.1.4 ML15223A7852015-08-10010 August 2015 NRC000229 - Indian Point, Unit 3 Technical Specifications 3.1.4 ML15223A7872015-08-10010 August 2015 NRC000196 - NRC Staff'S Initial Statement of Position on Contention NYS-25 (Reactor Vessel Internals) ML15223A3872015-08-10010 August 2015 NRCR00118 - Indian Point Unit 3 Technical Specifications (Excerpt) (Revised) ML15222A8352015-08-10010 August 2015 ENT000621 - Westinghouse, WCAP-17894-NP, Rev. 0, Component Inspection Details Supporting Aging Management of Reactor Internals at Indian Point Unit 2 (Sept. 2014) ML15223A8052015-08-10010 August 2015 NRC000169 - Indian Point, Unit 2 Technical Specifications (Excerpt) ML15223A9452015-08-10010 August 2015 NRC000223 - IP3 FSAR Rev. 04 Chapter 14 (2011) ML15223A3862015-08-10010 August 2015 NRC000222 - IP3 FSAR Rev. 04 Chapter 3 (2011) (Excerpt) ML15222B1242015-08-10010 August 2015 ENT000680 - Curriculum Vitae of Barry M. Gordon ML15222B1262015-08-10010 August 2015 ENT000687 - NRC, Safety Evaluation Report, Topical Report on ASME Section III Piping and Component Fatigue Analysis Utilizing the Westems Computer Code (WCAP-17577, Revision 2) (Undated) ML15222B1612015-08-10010 August 2015 ENTR00186 - Curriculum Vitae of Mark A. Gray ML15222A8482015-08-10010 August 2015 ENT000637 - NUREG-1874, Recommended Screening Limits for Pressurized Thermal Shock (PTS) (March 2010) 2016-03-21
[Table view] |
Text
RIV000109 Submitted: June 29, 2012 EXCERPT f2_AS H- f ~ 3 Official Trans;cript of Proceedings NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
Title:
Entergy f\luclear Vermont Yankee Docket Number: 50-271-LR; ASLBP No. 06-849-03-LR DOCKETED USNRC Location: Newfane, Vermont July 25, 2008 (1:50pm)
OFFICE OF SECRETARY RULEMAKINGS AND ADJUDICATIONS STAFF Date: Thursday, July 24, 2008 Work Order No.: NRC-2296 Pages 1451-1741 NEAL R. GROSS AND CO., INC.
Court Reporters and Transcribers 1323 Rhode Island Avenue, N.W.
Washington, D.C. 20005 (202) 234-4433 1?5-03
1475 1 portraying erosion corrosion to be a combined term
4 between the corrosion that we are now reserving to mean flow-accelerated corrosion from that which is caused mechanically as I interpolate him saying of an 5 erosion type of aspect. So what's your definition of 6 erosion under those assumptions that we're going to 7 reserve the word corroslon to be a shortened version 8 of FAC, flow-accelerated corrosion.
9 MR. HOPENFELD: Erosion, actually, Idon't 10 even know it's completely separate from erosion 11 corrosion. I'll have to explain that. But strictly 12 speaking of erosion, my understanding would be you 13 have particles in steam, droplets ln steam impinging
JUDGE W.li.RDWELL: Is that steam droplet 17 MR. HOPENFELD: Yes, that would be.
18 JUDGE WARDWELL: We separated that out.
19 MR. HOPENFELD: It could be called 20 JUDGE WARDWELL: That's droplet 21 impingement, so back to the corrosion. If they 22 removed droplet impingement, do you agree with his 23 definition of erosion as a mechanical process 24 MR. HOPENFELD: Not necessarily in the 25 context of corrosion and erosion, I can't separate it .
- (202) 234-4433 NEAL R. GROSS COURT REPORTERS AND TRANSCRIBERS 1323 RHODE ISLAND AVE., N.W.
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20005-3701 (202) 234-4433
1476 1 I can explain to you why. You *can't separate the two .
4 There is no acceptable theory as exactly what happens during the erosion corrosion process.
acceptable for the last 30 or 40 years, but you don't It lS 5 have enough shear stress, calculated shear forces 6 during normal flow. There is not. enough shear there 7 to abrade or wash off, as NRC defines it., to wash off 8 that. layer. There's been acceptance in the paper that.
9 was written in '76 on that subject..
10 JUDGE WARDWELL: Let me stop you right.
11 there.
12 It's my impression that. flow-accelerated 13 corrosion isn't. a physical washing off of the oxide,
- 14 15 16 but. more of a chemical melting of it.,
mind, and I thought I heard Dr. Horowitz-- again, at the next hearing I'm on, my simplistic I'm going to limit how many 17 Hs are present for witnesses.
18 Dr. Horowitz seemed to agree to that.
19 MR. HOPENFELD: I took the next step.
20 JUDGE WARDWELL: There's no argument, no 21 one says there's enough shear forces to physically 22 remove it, but. there's enough chemical action to melt 23 it, isn't there?
24 MR. HOPENFELD: No, no, no. NRC says it's 25 a washing away of the oxide.
- (202) 234*4433 NEAL R. GROSS COURT REPORTERS AND TRANSCRIBERS 1323 RHODE ISLAND AVE., N.W.
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20005-3701 (202) 234-4433
1477 1 JUDGE WARDWELL: I'll get to the NRC.
4 coming to, concepts.
MR. HOPENFELD: But back to what I there's no acceptable theory.
One concept I'm familiar with that has to Ther*e are was 5 do -- that you can have very, very -- some velocity.
6 You may have sufficient, sufficient shear force. It 7 doesn't take much to affect the cohesion, to affect 8 the oxide *layer. And I am not an expert on oxide 9 layer characteristics and all the details of that.
10 That's one theory. There are other theories that Dr.
11 Hausler has proposed, the creation of local extremely 12 high pressure. I'd rather he talk about that.
13 Their definition doesn't cover those acts,
- 14 15 16 those two acts as I just said.
JUDGE WARDWELL: Dr. Hausler, like to expound on that in regards to the definition?
would you 17 DR. HAUSLER: Yes, sir. Your Honor, 18 actually, I would. With your permission I would like 19 to cut through this fog of definition fairly quickly.
20 What this demonstrates that in fact over 21 the years the corrosion engineers have made confusion 22 in their semantics. And the chronology has developed 23 over the years. I mean perhaps to be more specific as 24 to what it is that I want to say.
25 Originally, erosion has been used for
- (202) 234*4433 NEAL R. GROSS COURT REPORTERS AND TRANSCRIBERS 1323 RHODE ISLAND AVE., N.W.
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20005-3701 (202) 234*4433
1478 1 corrosion phenomena were the two extremes, were, in
4 fact, mixing with the salts, fluid streams. We did, in fact, mechanical removal of the surface layers.
salts mixed into then have abrasion, Now this is the I
5 not what we're looking at.
6 JUDGE WARDWELL : So are you saying we 7 don't have to worry about the erosion part of erosion 8 corrosion?
9 DR. HAUSLER: I think that the corrosion 10 engineers have, in fact, used erosion just like Dr.
11 Horowitz and as Mr. Fitzpatrick indicated in areas of 12 high turbulence where you have high turbulence and you 13 get somewhat localized corrosion, but without the
- 14 15 16 definition of what localized really means.
the erosion.
corrosion engineers have identified And that that as 17 To approach the problem, I think we would 18 be a lot better off to look maybe at the mechanism of 19 that fundamental. And here is what I would say lS 20 that both are corrupt as well as what we might call 21 erosion corrosion due to high turbulence in a specific 22 location are, in fact, due to a dissolution mechanism 23 of the oxide layer on the surface. And the reason for 24 that is that very recently in Germany calculations 25 have been made with respect to the compressive
- (202) 234*4433 NEAL R. GROSS COURT REPORTERS AND TRANSCRIBERS 1323 RHODE ISLAND AVE., N.W.
WASHINGTON. D.C. 20005*3701 (202) 234*4433