ML12159A493
| ML12159A493 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | South Texas  |
| Issue date: | 06/11/2012 |
| From: | Balwant Singal Plant Licensing Branch IV |
| To: | Richards K South Texas |
| References | |
| TAC ME8586, TAC ME8587 | |
| Download: ML12159A493 (6) | |
Text
UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION WASHINGTON, D.C. 20555-0001 June 11, 2012 Mr. Kevin D. Richards President and Chief Executive Officerl STP Nuclear Operating Company South Texas Project P.O. Box 289 Wadsworth, TX 77483
SUBJECT:
SOUTH TEXAS PROJECT, UNITS 1 AND 2 - REVIEW OF 50-DAY RESPONSE TO REQUEST FOR INFORMATION REGARDING RECOMMENDATION 9.3 OF THE NEAR-TERM TASK FORCE RELATED TO THE FUKUSHIMA DAI-ICHI NUCLEAR POWER PLANT ACCIDENT (TAC NOS. ME8585 AND ME8587)
Dear Mr. Richards:
By letter dated March 12,2012, the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC or Commission) issued a Request for Information pursuant to Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations (10 CFR), paragraph 50.54(f) which included the Near Term Task Force (NTTF)
Recommendation 9.3 for Emergency Preparedness (EP). Specifically, licensees were requested to assess their means to power communications equipment onsite and offsite during a prolonged Station Blackout (SBO) event and to perform a staffing study to determine the staff required to fill all necessary positions in response to a multi-unit event. If a licensee could not meet the requested 90-day response, then that licensee was required to provide a response within 50 days of the issuance of the letter describing an alternative course of action and estimated completion date.
By letter dated May 9,2012, as supplemented by letter dated June 4,2012, STP Nuclear Operating Company, the licensee for South Texas Project, Units 1 and 2, submitted its 50-day response proposing an alternative course of action based upon the higher priority to complete the implementation of the revised EP Rule. As discussed in the enclosed NRC staff evaluation, the licensee's alternative approach outlined in its 50-day response letter is consistent with the guidance of industry document Nuclear Energy Institute (NEI) 12-01, "Guidance for Assessing Beyond Design Basis Accident Response Staffing and Communications Capabilities,'" and the direction of the Commission.
In addition, the NRC staff concludes that the licensee provided an adequate basis for its proposed alternative to responding to the 50.54(f) Request for Information regarding communications and staffing for NTTF Recommendation 9.3. In its letter dated June 4,2012, the licensee identified the regulatory commitments provided in the attachment to the enclosure to this letter.
NRC staff determined NEI 12-01 to be an acceptable approach in a letter dated May 15, 2012 (ADAMS Accession No. ML12131A043).
K. Richards
-2 If you have any questions, please contact me at 301-415-3016 or viae-mail at Balwant. Singal@nrc.gov.
Sincerely,
~~i1Lb~~
Balwant K. Singal, Senior Project Manager Plant Licensing Branch IV Division of Operating Reactor Licensing Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation Docket Nos. 50-498 and 50-499
Enclosure:
Staff Evaluation cc w/encl: Distribution via Listserv
NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION STAFF EVALUATION INFORMATION REQUEST MADE UNDER 10 CFR SO.S4(f)
REGARDING NEAR-TERM TASK FORCE RECOMMENDATION 9.3 STP NUCLEAR OPERATING COMPANY SOUTH TEXAS PROJECT, UNITS 1 AND 2 DOCKET NOS. S0-498 AND S0-499 By letter dated March 12, 2012 (Agencywide Documents Access and Management System (ADAMS) Accession No. ML12073A348), the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC or Commission) issued a Request for Information pursuant to Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations (10 CFR), paragraph SO.S4(f) which included the Near-Term Task Force (NTTF)
Recommendation 9.3 for Emergency Preparedness (EP). Specifically, licensees were requested to assess their means to power communications equipment onsite and offsite during a prolonged Station Blackout (SBO) event and to perform a staffing study to determine the staff required to fill all necessary positions in response to a multi-unit event. If a licensee could not meet the requested 90-day response, then that licensee was required to provide a response within 50 days of the issuance of the letter describing an alternative course of action and estimated completion date.
By letter dated May 3, 2012 (ADAMS Accession No. ML1212SA41 0), the Nuclear Energy Institute (NEI) submitted NEI 12-01, "Guideline for Assessing Beyond Design Basis Accident Response Staffing and Communications Capabilities," Revision 0, May 2012. The NRC staff reviewed NEI 12-01 and found it to be an acceptable method for licensees to use when responding to the NRC's 10 CFR SO.S4(f) Request for Information regarding communications and staffing for EP.
This staff evaluation is focused specifically on the licensee's response to the 10 CFR SO.S4(f) letters and not on the associated Orders.
By letter dated May 9,2012 (ADAMS Accession No. ML12135A472), as supplemented by letter dated June 4, 2012 (ADAMS Accession No. MLxxxxxxxxx2), STP Nuclear Operating Company (STPNOC), the licensee for South Texas Project (STP), Units 1 and 2, submitted its 50-day response to the 10 CFR SO.S4(f) Request for Information proposing an alternative course of action based upon the higher priority to complete the implementation of the revised EP Rule.
The NRC staff reviewed the licensee's proposed alternative against the guidance contained in NEI 12-01. In addition, the NRC staff also considered the direction given by the Commission in the Staff Requirements Memorandum (SRM) to SECY 12-002S, "Proposed Orders and Requests for Information in Response to Lessons Learned from Japan's March ii, 2011, Great Tohoku Earthquake and Tsunami," dated March 9, 2012 (ADAMS Accession No. ML120590347). This SRM stated, in part, that Completing implementation activities associated with the rule we have already promulgated has greater safety significance and also involves the coordinated As of the date of the transmittal letter for this Enclosure, the letter dated June 4, 2012, is not yet in ADAMS.
Enclosure 2
- 2 actions of our partners in State and local governments. Substantial public credibility benefits accrue from continuing these activities as a priority.
The NRC staff considers the existing EP framework and regulations provides reasonable assurance of adequate protection of public health and safety in the event of a radiological emergency. The revised EP rule that was promulgated on November 23, 2011, initiated a number of activities that will enhance EP programs, including conducting a staffing analysis and enhancing public notification systems. The implementation of the EP rule was given priority by the Commission and the NTIF recommendations should not displace ongoing work that has greater safety benefit, higher priority, or is necessary for continued safe operation of nuclear power plants. The NTIF Report concluded that continued operation and continued licensing activities do not pose an imminent risk to the public health and safety and are not inimical to the common defense and security.
The phased approach to responding to the 10 CFR 50.54(f) letters, combined with the definition of new response requirements associated with Fukushima NTIF Recommendation 4.2, as subsequently modified by the NRC staff and issued as NRC Order EA-12-049 (ADAMS Accession No. ML12054A736), will ensure that enhancements will be made to staffing and communications by licensees. It should be noted that the 10 CFR 50.54(f) letter and implementation of the Order includes completion of actions related to response assignments, staffing changes, issuance of new or revised procedures or guidelines, and training. Activities are ongoing by both the NRC and industry to initiate interim actions as a result of lessons learned from the events which will be provided in the 90-day response such as:
Methods to access the site Notification of staff Interim actions taken to date Given the above and that the licensee's approach was found to be consistent with the guidance of NEI 12-01 and the direction of the Commission, the NRC staff concludes that the licensee has provided an adequate basis for its proposed alternative responding to the 10 CFR 50.54(f) letters regarding communications and staffing for Recommendation 9.3.
In its letter dated June 4,2012, the licensee identified the regulatory commitments provided in the attachment to this staff evaluation.
Attachment
LIST OF REGULATORY COMMITMENTS PROVIDED IN STP NUCLEAR OPERATING COMPANY'S LETTER DATED JUNE 4,2012 Commitment Scheduled Due Date Condition Report
- 1. STPNOC will perform an assessment of the current communications systems and equipment used during an emergency event to identify any enhancements that may be needed to ensure communications are maintained during a large scale natural event. The assessment will be provided to the NRC.
10/31/12 12-11657-7
- 2. STPNOC will provide an implementation schedule of the time needed to implement the results of the communications assessment.
10/31/12 12-11657-8
- 3. STPNOC will perform an initial staffing assessment using NE112-01 and material from NEI1 0-05. (Phase 1 Assessment). STPNOC will provide the NRC with the results of the Phase 1 assessment and an implementation schedule of the time needed to implement any changes.
4/30/13 12-11657-9
- 4. STPNOC will perform a second staffing assessment as requested by the 50.54(f) letter using NE112-01 and provide the results of the assessment to the NRC.
(Phase 2 Assessment). STPNOC will provide the NRC with the results of the Phase 2 assessment and an implementation schedule of the time needed to implement any changes.
4 months prior to the beginning of 2RE17 (estimated date 6/4/14) 12-11657-10
- 5. STPNOC will identify changes associated with the Phase 1 staffing assessment that have been made or will be made to our emergency plan regarding the onshift or augmented staffing changes including any new or revised agreements with offsite resource providers (e.g., staffing, equipment, transportation, etc.) and provide this to the NRC.
4/30/13 12-11657-11
- 6. STPNOC will identify changes associated with the Phase 2 staffing assessment that have been made or will be made to our emergency plan regarding the on shift or augmented staffing changes including any new or revised agreements with offsite resource providers (e.g.. staffing. equipment, transportation, etc.) and provide this to the NRC.
4 months prior to the beginning of 2RE17 (estimated date 6/4/14)
I 12-11657-12 Attachment
- concurrence via email OFFICE NRR/DORL/LPL4/PM NRRlDORULPL4/LA NSIR/DPR/DDEPE/NRLB/BC
~-
NAME BSingal JBurkhardt KWilliams*
-~--.~.-~.-- t---~
- DATE 6/11/12 6/8112 6/6/12 OFFICE NRR/JLD/PMB/BC NRR/DORULPL4/BC NRRIDORULPL4/PM NAME RPascarelli
=lMarkley.
BSingal DATE
~
6/11/12 I
6/11/12 j 6/11/12