ML12116A285

NRC Staff Notification of Conducted Planned Ti 2516/001 Inspection and Issued Related Inspection Report Regarding Indian Point, Units 2 and 3

ML12116A285
Person / Time
Site:	Indian Point
Issue date:	04/25/2012
From:	Sherwin Turk NRC/OGC
To:	Kennedy M, Lawrence Mcdade, Richard Wardwell Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Panel
SECY RAS
References
RAS 22309, 50-247-LR, 50-286-LR, ASLBP 07-858-03-LR-BD01
Download: ML12116A285 (19)

Text

UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION WASHINGTON, D.C. 20555-0001 April 25, 2012 Lawrence G. McDade, Chair Dr. Michael F. Kennedy Administrative Judge Administrative Judge Atomic Safety and licensing Board Atomic Safety and Licensing Board U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Mail Stop: T -3 F23 Mail Stop: T-3 F23 Washington, D.C. 20555 Washington, D.C. 20555 Dr. Richard E. Wardwell Administrative Judge Atomic Safety and Licensing Board U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Mail Stop: T-3 F23 Washington, D.C. 20555 In the Matter of ENTERGY NUCLEAR OPERATIONS, INC.

(Indian Point Nuclear Generating Unit Nos. 2 and 3)

Docket Nos. 50-247 -LR/286-LR

Dear Administrative Judges:

In the NRC Staff's ("Staff") status report of March 1, 2012, the Staff informed the Board and parties that it planned to conduct an inspection of Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc. 's ("Entergy" or "Applicant") license renewal activities under Temporary Instruction (TI) 2516/001 ("Review of License Renewal Activities"). See "NRC Staff's Status Report in Response to the Atomic Safety and Licensing Board's Order of February 16, 2012" (March 1, 2012), at 2-3.

The Staff wishes to inform you that it has conducted its planned TI 2516/001 inspection, and has issued the related inspection report. Enclosed is a letter from Richard J. Conte (NRC) to John Ventosa (Entergy), dated April 19, 2012, transmitting "Indian Point Nuclear Generating Unit 2 - NRC Inspection Report 05000247/2012008," pertaining to the Staff's inspection of the Applicant's license renewal activities. The Staff notes that the enclosed inspection report discusses, in part, the Applicant's progress in implementing its aging management programs for certain matters that are the subject of contentions in this proceeding.

Sincerely,

~[lu~t:2 Sherwin E. Turk -"",-"",~

Counsel for NRC Staff Encl.: As stated cc w/Encl.: EIE Service List

UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION REG.ON.

475 ALLENDALE ROAD KING OF PRUSSIA, PENNSYLVANIA 19406-1415 April 19, 2012 Mr. John Ventosa, Site Vice President Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc.

Indian Point Energy Center 450 Broadway, GSB P.O. Box 249 Buchanan, NY 10511-0249

SUBJECT:

INDIAN POINT NUCLEAR GENERATING UNIT 2 - NRC INSPECTION REPORT 05000247/2012008

Dear Mr. Ventosa:

On March 8,2012, the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) completed an inspection at the Indian Point Nuclear Generating Unit 2. The enclosed report documents the results of the inspection, which were discussed on March 8, 2012, with Mr. John Curry and members of your staff.

This inspection was an examination of license renewal activities under Temporary Instruction (TI) 2516/001, Review of License Renewal Activities. The inspection was directed toward those activities and facilities accessible during the refueling outage. The inspection also reviewed the completion of commitments made during the renewed license application process and compliance with the Commission's rules and regulations and the conditions of your operating license. Within these areas, the inspection involved examination of selected procedures and representative records, observations of activities, and interviews with personnel.

On the basis of the samples selected for review, there were no findings of significance identified during this inspection. The NRC staff identified two instances of commitments which could not be considered completed at this time. Given the scheduled completion of September 28, 2013, for these commitments, we will incorporate a followup review as a part of our planned team inspection in this area prior to September 28, 2013, to verify completion along with the completion of other commitments.

In accordance with 10 CFR 2.390 of the NRC's "Rules of Practice," a copy of this letter and its enclosure will be available electronically for public inspection in the NRC Public Document Room or from the Publicly Available Records (PARS) component of NRC's document system Agencywide Document Access and Management System (ADAMS). ADAMS is accessible from the NRC Web site at http:/twww.nrc.gov/reading-rm/adams.html{the Public Electronic Reading Room).

Sincere~y, fiJ~ }, {;;;;:fp Richard J. Conte, Chief Engineering Branch1 Division of Reactor Safety

Mr. John Ventosa Site Vice President Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc.

Indian Point Energy Center 450 Broadway, GSB Buchanan, NY 10511*0249

SUBJECT:

INDIAN POINT NUCLEAR GENERATING UNIT 2 - NRC INSPECTION REPORT 05000247/2012008

Dear Mr. Ventosa:

On March 8, 2012, the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) completed an inspection at the Indian Point Nuclear Generating Unit 2. The enclosed report documents the results of the inspection, which were discussed on March 8, 2012, with Mr. John Curry and members of your staff.

This inspection was an examination of license renewal activities under Temporary Instruction (TI) 2516/001, Review of License Renewal Activities. The inspection was directed toward those activities and facilities accessible during the refueling outage. The inspection also reviewed the completion of commitments made during the renewed license application process and compliance with the Commission's rules and regulations and the conditions of your operating license. Within these areas, the inspection involved examination of selected procedures and representative records, observations of activities, and interviews with personnel.

On the basis of the samples selected for review, there were no findings of significance identified during this inspection. The NRC staff identified two instances of commitments which could not be considered completed at this time. Given the scheduled completion of September 28, 2013.

for these commitments, we will incorporate a followup review as a part of our planned team inspection in this area prior to September 28,2013, to verify completion along with the completion of other commitments.

In accordance with 10 CFR 2.390 of the NRC's "Rules of Practice," a copy of this letter and its enclosure will be available electronically for public inspection in the NRC Public Document Room or from the Publicly Available Records (PARS) component of NRC's document system Agencywide Document Access and Management System (ADAMS). ADAMS is accessible from the NRC Web site at http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/adams.html(the Public Electronic Reading Room).

Sincerely, IRA!

Richard J. Conte, Chief Engineering Branch1 Division of Reactor Safety DOCUMENT NAME: G:\DRS\Engineering Branch 1\- Meyer\lndlan Pt 71003\IR 2012-081P Rev 2.docx ADAMS ACCESSION NUMBER' Ml12110A315

~ Non*Sensitive ~ Publicly Available

~ SUNSI Review 0 Sensitive 0 Non*Publicly Available OFFICE RIIDRS RI/DRP RIIDRS NAME GMeyer/RJC for MGray RConte DATE 4/11/12 4/19/12 4/19/12 OFFICIAL RECORD COpy

J. Ventosa 2 Docket No. 50-247 License No. DPR-26

Enclosure:

NRC Inspection Report 05000247/2012008 cc w/enclosure: Distribution via ListServ

J. Ventosa 3 Distribution w/encr: (via E-mail)

W. Dean, RA (R10RAMAIL RESOURCE)

D. Lew, DRA (R10RAMAIL RESOURCE)

J. Clifford, DRP (R1DRPMaii Resource)

J. Trapp, DRP (R1DRPMAIL Resource)

C. Miller, DRS (R1DRSMAIL RESOURCE)

P. Wilson, DRS (R1DRSMAIL RESOURCE)

M.McCopp~,RIOEDO M. Gray, DRP B. Bickett, DRP S. McCarver, DRP M. Jennerich, DRP M. Catts, SRI A. Ayegbusi, RI D. Hochmuth, AA RidsNrrPM Indian Point Resource RidsNrrDorlLpl1-1 Resource ROPreport Resource D. Bearde, DRS T. Lupoid, DRS R. Conte, DRS G. Meyer, DRS

U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION REGION I Docket: 50-247 License: DPR-26 Report: 05000247/2012008 Licensee: Entergy Nuclear Northeast (Entergy)

Facility: Indian Point Nuclear Generating Unit 2 Location: Buchanan, NY Dates: March 5 - 8, 2012 Inspectors: G. Meyer, Senior Reactor Inspector, Division of Reactor Safety M. Modes, Senior Reactor Inspector, Division of Reactor Safety Accompanied By: K. Green, Senior Project Manager, Division of License Renewal W. Holston, Senior Technical Reviewer, Division of License Renewal Approved By: Richard J. Conte, Chief Engineering Branch 1 Division of Reactor Safety Enclosure

SUMMARY

OF FINDINGS IR 05000247/2012008; 03/05/2012 - 03/08/2012; Indian Point Nuclear Generating Unit 2; Review of License Renewal Activities.

The report covers a one week inspection of the implementation of license renewal activities during the Indian Point Unit 2 refueling outage. It was conducted by two region based engineering inspectors under Temporary Instruction 25161001. No findings were identified, The inspectors determined that Entergy actions on four commitments (Commitments 28,29,34, and

36) were complete and met regulatory expectations as reflected in the staff's safety evaluation report. Inspection of two commitments (Commitments 2 and 3) concluded that additional inspection was needed.

Ii Enclosure

Report Details

4. OTHER ACTIVITIES COAl 40A2 Other - License Renewal Activities (TI 2516/001)

a. Inspection Scope This inspection was performed by two NRC Region I based inspectors to evaluate the license renewal activities at the Indian Point Nuclear Generating Unit 2 in accordance with Temporary Instruction (TI) 2516/001. As noted in this TI: 'This procedure was written to allow for timely verification by NRC inspectors that the applicant has made sufficient progress in implementing its license renewal commitments before entering its post-40-year license period and to allow documentation of these inspection activities while the operating license is being considered for renewal." This phase of the inspection is "to be completed during the outage preceding the beginning of the period of extended operations for the purpose of observing or verifying commitments of tests or other activities that require containment entries or access to rooms that would normally be posted as a high-radiation area or higher when the reactor is operating." The inspectors performed in-plant observations of license renewal related activities and sampled Entergy actions on commitments. The bases for the review was the NRC staff's safety evaluation report (NUREG-1930) and related licensee letters associated with licensee renewal regulatory commitments, including Letter NL-11-101, dated August 22, 2011.

b. Findings and Observations No findings were identified.

b.1 In-Plant Observations The inspectors observed ongoing activities and inspected the general condition of structures, systems, and components within the scope of license renewal. The inspectors performed reviews in the following areas, as related to commitments and aging management programs (AMPs):

• Turbine Building - Flow Accelerated Corrosion AMP

• Turbine Building - One-Time Inspection Program (Commitment 19)

• Station Blackout (SBO)/Appendix R Diesel Generator (Commitment 34)

The inspectors determined the general conditions to be satisfactory and the Entergy activities to be in accordance with facility programs and procedures.

Enclosure

2 b.2 Commitments - Review Complete Commitment 28 - Water Chemistry Control - Closed Cooling Water Program Commitment 28 provides that Entergy will "Enhance the Water Chemistry Control Closed Cooling Water Program to maintain water chemistry of the IP2 SBO/Appendix R diesel generator cooling system per EPRI guidelines" and will "Enhance the Water Chemistry Control - Closed Cooling Water Program to maintain the IP2 and IP3 security generator and fire protection diesel cooling water pH and glycol within limits specified by EPRI guidelines" by September 28, 2013. The license renewal team inspection (Report 05000247/2008006 dated August 1,2008) had noted that some parameters were not monitored for some diesels in existing procedures.

The inspectors reviewed the implementation plan, EPRI guidelines, revised chemistry sampling procedures and acceptance criteria, and chemistry results for the SBO/App. R, fire protection, and security diesels.

The inspectors concluded that Commitment 28 had been completed.

Commitment 29 - Sulfates in the Refueling Water Storage Tank (RWST)

Commitment 29 provides that Entergy will "Enhance the Water Chemistry Control Primary and Secondary Program for IP2 to test sulfates monthly in the RWST with a limit of <150 ppb" by September 28,2013.

The inspectors reviewed the implementation plan, RWST chemistry sampling procedure, and RWST chemistry results for 2010 and 2011.

The inspectors concluded that Commitment 29 had been completed.

Commitment 34 - Station Blackout (SaOl/Appendix R Diesel Generator Commitment 34 provides that "IP2 SaO/Appendix R diesel generator will be installed and operational by April 30, 2008."

Inspection Report 05000247/2008006, dated August 1, 2008, documented the license renewal team inspection of the IP2 SaO/App. R diesel generator following its installation and operational testing. Inspection Report 05000247/2008003, dated August 13, 2008, documented the inspection of the post-modification testing of this diesel generator.

The inspectors concluded that Commitment 34 had previously been completed.

Commitment 36 - Refueling Cavity Concrete Commitment 36 provides that Entergy will "Perform a one-time inspection and evaluation of a sample of potentially affected IP2 refueling cavity concrete prior to the period of extended operation. The sample will be obtained by core boring the refueling cavity wall in an area that is susceptible to exposure to borated water leakage. The inspection will Enclosure

3 include an assessment of embedded reinforcing steel. A sample of leakage fluid will be analyzed to determine the composition of the fluid." These actions are scheduled for completion by September 28, 2013. Commitment 36 also addresses core bores and leakage fluid analysis in the first ten years of the period of extended operation. During refueling operations at Unit 2, leakage through the reactor refuel cavity liner plate had caused the cavity flood-up water to migrate through the concrete walls of the cavity.

NRC was concerned the borated water flowing through the concrete and past the reinforcement bars could cause an indeterminate degradation.

The inspectors reviewed the test results of concrete cores removed from the IP2 refuel structure in Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-11-00002, Assessment of Concrete Aging From Selected Indian Point Structures, Rev 0, January 10,2011. The originally specified concrete strength, per United Engineers and Constructors Drawing 9321-01-5 1, Specification for Design, Inspection and Tests of Concrete, High Strength Bolts, Compaction of Fill and Rock Bearing, was 3000 psi at 28 days. Entergy took seven core samples from the Unit 2 fuel pool structure; the compression results were 7,213 psi, 3,202 psi, 5,890 psi, 6,294 psi, 8,307 psi, 5,497 psi, and 6,448 psi. Using the guidance of American Concrete Institute, ACI 214.4R, the calculated equivalent in-structure compressive strength was 4,341 psi.

Reinforcing bars were part of three of the concrete samples taken from the Unit 2 fuel pool structure. The above referenced report noted there was no visible degradation of the reinforcing bars. This observation compared favorably with concrete core samples taken from the Unit 1 fuel pool structure, which was wetted by a boric acid solution equivalent to Unit 2 for approximately 30 years.

Nine samples were taken from the core bores for further interrogation by Petrography with a Stereo-microscope. These samples were examined in general accordance with ASTM C-856-04, Standard Practice for Petrographic Examination of Hardened Concrete. There were observations of concrete paste discoloration and cracks noted in the Petrographic samples taken from the core samples extracted from the west and south walls of the fuel pool. The discoloration was attributed to the differences in the hydration of the paste most likely due to exposure to the water through the cracks, and the report concluded the examined material was of "relatively good quality."

The inspectors concluded that Commitment 36 is on track to be completed.

b.3 Commitments - Needing Additional NRC Review Commitment 2 - Bolting Integrity Program Commitment 2 provides that Entergy will "Enhance the Bolting Integrity Program for IP2 and IP3 to clarify that actual yield strength is used in selecting materials for low susceptibility to SCC and clarify that prohibition on use of lubricants containing MoS2 for bolting" by September 28, 2013. Commitment 2 also states that "The Bolting Integrity Program manages loss of preload and loss of material for all external bolting."

Enclosure

4 The inspectors reviewed the implementation plan and the revised mechanical fastener procedure, which had specific instructions on bolting regarding the use of actual yield strength and the prohibition against molybdenum disulfide as a lubricant. Nonetheless, there was no planned action regarding the second commitment statement regarding loss of preload and loss of material, despite Commitment 2 being considered completed by Entergy. Entergy entered this concern into the license renewal corrective action system as item LO-LAR-2011-00174, CA-66.

The inspectors concluded that the specific procedural instructions of Commitment 2 had been completed, but that review of any action on the general statement needed to be reviewed during a subsequent NRC inspection.

Commitment 3 - Buried Piping and Tanks Inspection Program Commitment 3 provides that Entergy will "Implement the Buried Piping and Tanks Inspection Program for IP2 [and IP3] as described in LRA Section B.1.6" and perform the following:

• "Include in the Buried Piping and Tanks Inspection Program described in LRA Section B.1.6 a risk assessment of the in-scope buried piping and tanks that includes consideration of the impacts of buried piping or tank leakage and of conditions affecting the risk for corrosion."

• "Classify pipe segments and tanks as having a high, medium or low impact of leakage based on the safety class, the hazard posed by fluid contained in the piping and the impact of leakage on reliable plant operation."

• "Determine corrosion risk through consideration of piping or tank material, soil resistivity, drainage, the presence of cathodic protection and the type of coating."

• "Establish inspection priority and frequency for periodic inspections of the in scope piping and tanks based on the results of the risk assessment."

• "Perform inspection using inspection techniques with demonstrated effectiveness. "

The inspectors reviewed the implementation plan and Entergy fleet, corporate engineering and site engineering procedures. The inspectors also reviewed a summary report of inspection results, cathodic protection records, and area potential earth current (APEC) survey results.

The inspectors reviewed the risk assessment, classifications of leakage impacts, and corrosion risk categorizations addressed in the first three bulleted items above, and found the evaluation approaches to be sound and generally credible. The inspectors reviewed the inspection plan based on these evaluations to be reasonable and appropriate. The inspectors reviewed a sample of inspection records, which showed that Inspections had involved direct visual inspection, followed by external ultrasonic test (UT) inspections in some cases, and were thorough and appropriate.

The inspectors noted two concerns. First, site engineering procedure SEP-UIP*'PEC stated that guided wave inspection was an acceptable indirect inspection technique.

Enclosure

5 The inspectors noted that while guided wave inspection was a credible method to inform other inspections, it did not meet the "demonstrated effectiveness" standard and was not suitable for inspection by itself. There was no evidence that guided wave inspection had been solely used to accept inspected piping or tanks, but the procedure merited clarification on the use of guided wave inspection. Second, Entergy fleet procedure EN-DC-343 listed the affected Unit 2 underground systems in Attachment 9.2, but omitted the river water, circulating water, and containment isolation support systems.

There was no immediate impact on the inspection plan given that these actions were not in effect without a renewed license. However, Entergy will review this matter and they entered these two concerns into the license renewal corrective action system as item LO-LAR-2011-00174, CA-67.

Given the preliminary progress on Commitment 3, the inspectors determined that additional inspection was merited on the clarification of the use of guided wave inspection, coverage of omitted underground systems, and subsequently completed inspections.

b.4 Annual Updates 10 CFR 54.21 (b) requires each year following submittal of the license renewal application and at least three months before scheduled completion of the NRC reView, an amendment to the renewal application be submitted that identifies any change to the current licensing basis (CLB) of the facility that materially affects the contents of the license renewal application, including the Updated Final Safety Analysis Report

{UFSAR} supplement. The inspectors selected a sample from annual update submittals for review.

Amendment 8 to the application transmitted by a letter (NL-09-060) dated May 15, 2009.

This amendment was a result of a review of documents affecting the current license basis during the period May 1, 2008 through March 1, 2009, since the prior annual update amendment. The review concluded that sections of the application were affected by changes to the current licensing basis. For example, during this period, the Indian Point 3 Security Diesel was replaced, affecting Section 3.3.2.1.15 and Table 3.3.3-15 IP3 of the application.

This example illustrated Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc. compliance with 10 CFR 54.21 {b}.

Summary No findings were identified and general conditions in the plant areas observed were satisfactory. The inspectors determined that Entergy actions on four commitments (Commitments 28, 29, 34, and 36) were complete and met regulatory expectations as reflected in the staff's safety evaluation report. Inspection of two commitments (Commitments 2 and 3) concluded that additional inspection was needed. Further NRC inspection of Unit 2 commitments, including Commitments 2 and 3, is planned prior to the scheduled completion date of September 28, 2013.

Enclosure

6 40A6 Exit Meeting The inspectors presented the inspection results to Mr. John Curry, License Renewal Project Manager, and other members of the staff on March 8, 2012. The inspectors confirmed that no proprietary material was examined during the inspection.

ATTACHMENT: SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION Enclosure

A-1 ATTACHMENT SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION KEY POINTS OF CONTACT licensee Personnel J. Curry, license Renewal Team Project Manager N. Azevedo, Supervisor, Supervisor Engineering Programs C. Caputo, license Renewal Team G. Dahl, licensing Engineer R. Drake, System Engineer J. Flagg. license Renewal Team D. Lach, license Renewal Team LIST OF DOCUMENTS REVIEWED General NUREG-1930, Safety Evaluation Report Related to the license Renewal of Indian Point Nuclear Generating Unit Nos. 2 and 3, November 2009 NUREG-1930. Safety Evaluation Report Related to the license Renewal of Indian Point Nuclear Generating Unit Nos. 2 and 3. Supplement 1. August 30. 2011 Entergy Letter NL-11-1 01. Clarification for Request for Additional Information (RAI), dated August 22. 2011 In-plant Observations One-Time Inspection Matrix (draft)

One-Time Inspection Form 169473-01 One-Time Inspection Form 51282477-01 WO 00255920, FAC UT of heater drain piping WO 00255936, FAC UT of reheater drain piping Commitment 2 (Bolting Integrity)

IP-RPT-11-LRD03, Review of the Bolting Integrity AMP for Implementation, Rev 0 (draft)

O-MS~411, Torquing of Mechanical Fasteners, Rev 3 Enclosure

A-2 gommitment 3 (Buried Piping and Tanks Inspection)

IP-RPT-11-LRD07, Review of the Buried Pipe and Tanks Inspection AMP for Implementation, Rev 0 (draft)

EN-DC-343, Underground Piping and Tanks Inspection and Monitoring Program, Rev 4 CEP-UPT -0100, Underground Piping and Tanks Inspection and Monitoring. Rev 0 SEP-UIP-IPEC, Underground Components Inspection Plan, Rev 0 PCA Engineering Inc, Cathodic Protection System Maintenance Record Sheet, AFW Pump Room Annex - Unit 2, PCA Job No. 30493, 2/28/12 IP-RPT-11-0045, Indian Point Energy Center APEC Survey, 11/17/11 IPEC Underground Piping and Tank Program Completed Buried Pipe Inspections, 1/11112 Thielsch Engineering, Laboratory Testing Data Sheet, 12/12/11 Photographs of Nov/Dec 2011 inspections of IP2 24" SRW lines 409 (16 pictures dated 11/23/11) and 408 (24 pictures dated 11/23/11)

IP2-UT-11-050, UT Erosion Corrosion Exam - 24 SRW line 409, 12/28/11 IP2-UT-11-048, UT Erosion Corrosion Exam - 24 SRW line 408, 12/28/1,2 pictures Inspection Report, IP3 AFW/Cond Return to CST (8" line 1080), we 279578-03,12/9/11, 4 pictures Inspection Report, IP3 CST Supply to AFW Pumps (12" line 1070), we 279578-03, 12/9/11, 4 pictures IP3-UT-11-076, UT E/C Examination IP3 8" line 1080, 12/15/11 IP3-UT-11-077, UT EIC Examination IP3 12" line 1070, 12115/11 Commitmen128 (Water ghemistry - Closed Cooling)

EPRI TR-107396, Closed Cooling Water Chemistry Guideline, Rev 1 IP-RPT-11-LRD41, Review of the Water Chemistry- Closed Cooling Water AMP for Implementation, Rev 0 (draft) 0-CY-2510, Closed Cooling Water Chemistry SpeCifications and Frequencies, Rev 13 IP2 SBP/App R diesel quarterly chemistry results, March 2008 to January 2012 IP2 Fire pump diesel quarterly chemistry results. January 2007 to December 2011 IP2 Security diesel quarterly chemistry results, January 2007 to December 2011 Commitment 29 (RWST Sulfates)

IP-RPT-11-LRD42, Review of the Water Chemistry - Primary and Secondary AMP for Implementation, Rev 0 (draft) 2-CY-2625, General Plant Systems Specifications and Frequencies, Rev 16 IP2 RWST monthly chemistry results, January 2010 to February 2012 Commitment 36 (Refueling gavlty Concrete)

ER No. IP-RPT-11-00002, Assessment of Concrete Aging From Selected Indian Point Structures, Rev 0 United Engineers and Constructors Drawing 9321-01-5-1, SpeCification for DeSign, Inspection and Tests of Concrete, High Strength Bolts, Compaction of Fill and Rock Bearing ASTM C-856-04, Standard Practice for Petrographic Examination of Hardened Concrete Enclosure

A-3 LIST OF ACRONYMS ADAMS Agencywide Documents Access and Management System AMP Aging Management Program CLB Current licensing Basis EPRI Electric Power Research Institute LRA License Renewal Application NRC U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission RFO Refueling Outage RWST Refueling Water Storage Tank SBO Station Blackout TI Temporary Instruction UFSAR Updated Final Safety Analysis Report UT Ultrasonic Test Enclosure

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION BEFORE THE ATOMIC SAFETY AND LICENSING BOARD In the Matter of )

)

ENTERGY NUCLEAR OPERATIONS, INC. ) Docket Nos. 50-247 -LRl286-LR

)

(Indian Point Nuclear Generating )

Units 2 and 3) )

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I hereby certify that the foregoing Letter from ShelWin E. Turk to the Atomic Safety and licensing Board, dated April 25, 2012, with the enclosed letter from Richard J. Conte to John Ventosa, dated April 19, 2012 (transmitting "Indian Point Nuclear Generating Unit 2 - NRC Inspection Report 05000247/2012008"), in the above-captioned proceeding have been filed and served by Electronic Information Exchange (EIE), with copies to be served by the EIE system on the following persons, this 25th day of April 2012.

Lawrence G. McDade, Chair Office of Commission Appellate Atomic Safety and licensing Board Panel Adjudication Mail Stop - T-3 F23 U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Mail Stop: 0-16G4 Washington, D.C. 20555-0001 Washington, DC 20555-0001 E-mail: Lawrence.McDade@nrc.gov E-mail: OCAAMAIL@nrc.gov Dr. Richard E. Wardwell Office of the Secretary Atomic Safety and licensing Board Panel Attn: Rulemaking and Adjudications Staff Mail Stop - T-3 F23 Mail Stop: 0-16G4 U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, D.C. 20555-0001 Washington, DC 20555-0001 E-mail: Richard.Wardwell@nrc.gov E-mail: Hearingdocket@nrc.gov Dr. Michael F. Kennedy Josh Kirstein, Esq.

Atomic Safety and licensing Board Panel Anne Siarnacki, Esq.

Mail Stop - T -3 F23 Atomic Safety and licensing Board Panel U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Mail Stop - T-3 F23 Washington, D. C. 20555-0001 U. S, Nuclear Regulatory Commission E-mail: MichaeI.Kennedy@nrc.gov Washington, D.C. 20555-0001 E-Mail: Josh.Kirstein@nrc.gov E-Mail: Anne.Siarnacki@nrc.gov

-2 Kathryn M. Sutton, Esq.

• John J. Sipos, Esq.*

Paul M. Bessette, Esq. Charlie Donaldson, Esq.

Jonathan Rund, Esq. Assistants Attorney General Raphael Kuyler, Esq. New York State Department of Law Morgan, Lewis & Bockius, LLP Environmental Protection Bureau 1111 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW The Capitol Washington, D.C. 20004 Albany, NY 12224 E-mail: ksutton@morganlewis.com E-mail: John.Sipos@ag.ny.gov E-mail: pbessette@morganlewis.com Charlie.Donaldson@ag.ny.gov E-mail: jrund@morganlewis.com E-mail: rkuyler@moganlewis.com Martin J. O'Neill, Esq.* Janice A. Dean, Esq.*

Morgan, Lewis & Bockius, LLP Assistant Attorney General, 1000 Louisiana Street, Suite 4000 Office of the Attorney General Houston, TX 77002 of the State of New York E-mail: martin.o.neill@morganlewis.com 120 Broadway, 25th Floor New York, NY 10271 E-mail: Janice.Dean@ag.ny.gov Elise N. Zoli, Esq.*

Goodwin Procter, LLP Joan Leary Matthews, Esq.

• Exchange Place Senior Attorney for Special Projects 53 State Street New York State Department of Boston, MA 02109 Environmental Conservation E-mail: ezoli@goodwinprocter.com Office of the General Counsel 625 Broadway, 14th Floor Albany, NY 12233-1500 William C. Dennis, Esq.* E-mail: jlmatthe@gw.dec.state.ny.us Assistant General Counsel Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc.

440 Hamilton Avenue John Louis Parker, Esq.*

White Plains, NY 10601 Office of General Counsel, Region 3 E-mail: wdennis@entergy.com New York State Department of Environmental Conservation 21 South Putt Corners Road Melissa-Jean Rotini, Esq. New Paltz, NY 12561-1620 Assistant County Attorney E-mail: ilparker@gw.dec.state.ny.us Office of Robert F. Meehan, Esq.

Westchester County Attorney 148 Martine Avenue, 6th Floor White Plains, NY 10601 E-Mail: MJR1@westchestergov.com

- 3 Sean Murray, Mayor Manna Jo Greene*

Kevin Hay, Village Administrator Karla Raimundi, Esq.

Village of Buchanan Hudson River Sloop Clearwater, Inc.

Municipal Building 724 Wolcott Avenue Buchanan, NY 10511-1298 Beacon, NY 12508 E-mail: vOb@bestweb.net E-mail: mannajo@clearwater.org E-mail: smurray@villageofbuchanan.com E-mail: karla@clearwater.org Administrator@villageofbuchanan.com Robert Snook, Esq.

• Daniel Riesel, Esq.

• Office of the Attorney General Thomas F. Wood, Esq.

State of Connecticut Victoria Shiah, Esq.

55 Elm Street Sive, Paget & Riesel, P.C.

P.O. Box 120 460 Park Avenue Hartford, CT 06141-0120 New York, NY 10022 E-mail: robert.snook@ct.gov E-mail: driesel@sprlaw.com E-mail: vshiah@sprlaw.com Phillip Musegaas, Esq.* Michael J. Delaney, Esq.*

Deborah Brancato, Esq. Director, Energy Regulatory Affairs Riverkeeper, Inc. New York City Department of Environmental 20 Secor Road Protection Ossining, NY 10562 59-17 Junction Boulevard E-mail: phillip@riverkeeper.org Flushing, NY 11373 E-mail: dbrancato@riverkeeper.org E-mail: mdelaney@dep.nyc.gov Sherwin E. Turk Counsel for NRC Staff U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Mail Stop 0-15 D21 Washington, DC 20555-0001 (301) 415-1533 E-mail: Sherwin. Turk@nrc.gov