ML12102A252
| ML12102A252 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Seabrook  |
| Issue date: | 12/08/2011 |
| From: | Conte R NRC Region 1 |
| To: | Conte R, George Thomas Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation, NRC Region 1 |
| References | |
| FOIA/PA-2012-0119 | |
| Download: ML12102A252 (2) | |
Text
Lamb, John From:
Conte, Richard 1,(
Sent:
Thursday, December'08, 2011 12:03 PM To:
Conte, Richard; Thomas, George Cc:
Murphy, Martin; Lamb, John
Subject:
RE: Draft Markey Response This afternoon I can only be reached by cell, if we are to discuss the questions below.
Rich Conte, EB-1 Branch Chief, Region I (Office)... -fc
~jjJ~NRC cell)
From: Conte, Richard Sent: Thursday, December 08, 2011 10:32 AM To: Thomas, George Cc: Murphy, Martin; Lamb, John
Subject:
RE: Draft Markey Response George and Martin, Art B 'urritt and I would like to talk with you today, either early afternoon or late afternoon 400pmn or no later than 900am tomorrow. We are meeting with our executives tomorrow at 1000am for a within region strategy session. We are headed for a Division level executive brief first week in January 2012
- 1. Why only a draft of TIA by 12/31/11?
- 2.
How crucial is finalizing the TIA and reviewing what the licensee's final plans are along with white paper on tensile strength testing.
- 3. Best forum to communicate and critique their final plans when available.
- a. Conference call
- b. Onsite management meeting closed to public
- c. Public meetings at the site or headquarters or at the region
- 4. You view on another TIA to address license work on CEB finite element analysis - beyond the region's capability.
- 5.
Suggestion for stronger regulatory footprint such as 50.54f and orders.
Fro m: T homas, Ge or ge
{ (
Sent: Thursday, December 08, 2011 7:34 AM To: Lehman, Bryce Cc: Murphy, Martin; Lamb, John; Conte, Richard
Subject:
RE: Draft Markey Response
- Bryce,
,,ufination in mis record was deleted in accordance with the, Freedom of Information Act, exemptions
,6.
FOW -A- /
0
Marked-up in the attached is my input. This includes the input I provided yesterday. Please feel free to edit or cut as necessary.
Thanks.
George From: Lehman, Bryce \\'~
Sent: Wednesday, December 07, 2011 4:45 PM To: Thomas, George; Lamb, John; Conte, Richard
Subject:
FW: Draft Markey Response Gentlemen, Please review the attached draft response letter and provide your feedback to me as soon as possible.
- Thanks, Bryce George, Roger sent this back to me before I could pass your input along. I will review both this evening and try to incorporate as necessary. Thanks for your timely feedback.
From: Rihm, Roger
\\J Sent: Wednesday, December 07, 2011 4:31 PM To: Lehman, Bryce
Subject:
Draft Markey Response Here's my proposal (you will recognize most of it!)
Generally, we like to write these response to congress with as little citation of regs and quotations from regulations as possible. Unfortunately, I don't see how we can really do that in this case. Let me know what you think.
Roger 2