ML12094A117
| ML12094A117 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Indian Point  |
| Issue date: | 06/30/2010 |
| From: | GZA GeoEnvironmental |
| To: | Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Panel |
| SECY EHD | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML1289A594 | List: |
| References | |
| RAS 22131, 50-247-LR, 50-286-LR, ASLBP 07-858-03-LR-BD01 | |
| Download: ML12094A117 (47) | |
Text
ENT00334E Submitted: March 29, 2012 FINAL QUARTERLY LONG-TERM GROUNDWATER MONITORING REPORT Q2 2010 (REPORT NO. 10)
APPENDIX E: POST-Q2 2010 MID-QUARTER SAMPLING DATA SHEETS
GZA GeoEnvironmental of New York WELL ID:MuJ-44-bl>
Modified Traditional Purge SAMPLE ID: 0\ f, Sampling Data Sheet CLIENT: Entergy - [PEC PROJECT NO: 01.0017869.92 SITE: Buchanan. NY \ I t DATE: b (\Q WEATHER: S U VI *f ( '.- o.J d S '7Q oS SAMPLER(S): M . 'PH +/-o~
WATER COLUMN HEIGHT (et) Well Diameter: _ _ _ _ in 07 .00 .
DTB
_ _'7. 4 0 _ _ ft Water Column Height Diameter Multfplien 1 0.041 GALLONS OF WATER PER WELL VOLUME: 2 0.163 4 0.653 Water Column Height 7. '-i 0 o.\~=3 = _..:..\_' :;:2:...;:O=--__ gal Multiplier Well Volume 1,20 1.5 _ _..l...\ .:.....:..~~( _ _ gal Designed Purge Volume TOTAL VOLUME PURGED: I. 55' gal WATER QUALITY: DTW= Transducer Actual Depth Drive Turbidity Time (SU) ORP Pressure Notes (NTU) 0.5" Equipment Equipment Used Identification #
YSI 556 MPS Reader and 5563 Sonde 5' turbidity meter '200r042.q~
NOTES AND OBSERVATIONS:
Depth and Depth to Water (DTW) measurements are given in feet from top of casing.
Groundwater Elevation measurements are given in feet ms!.
GZA GeoEnvironmental of New York WELLID: h1w -44J02 Modified Traditional Purge SAMPLE ID: 0 ']
Sampling Data Sheet CLIENT: Entergy - IPEC PROJECT NO: 01.0017869.92 SITE: Buchanan, NY WEATHER: 5\)\1 -+ c...-\QUd s 70 s
, DATE:
SAMPLER(S): M01. rA2t~ I~
WATER COLUMN HEIGHT (ft) 34.00 Well Diameter:
- - - in
\02.00 - h\'* OQ = --"'----'--'-=-=----
ft DTH DTW Water Column Height Diameter Multipliers I 0.041 GALLONS OF WATER PER WELL VOLUME: 2 0.163 4 0.653 Water Column Height 3 ~ .0 0 x 0,04, _(_.=.,3_9_4<---_gal Multiplier Well Volume x 1.5 _-=2:. . . .:~o~'1~___ gal Designed Purge Volume TOTAL VOLUME PURGED: 2. 2 5 gal WATER QUALITY: DTW= Transducer Actual Depth Volume Specific Dissolved DTWor Temp Turbidity Time Purged Conductivity Oxygen pH (SU) ORP Notes Actual Depth (DC) (NTU)
(gal) (Stcm) 19/J)
\242 0 pv tv\ r Of0
\245 0 .05 - \~.'"3 o,rCie.. '1.07 t,29 ,s 4 ~O\. b
\ 2 4~ 0.40
\252 (') .bO
-- \7.3!jS> o.ct'R4
\7.39 '.\01 7.5-' 7.32 1'f;7. 2 71 \. 3 7.310 7.32 I ~O.2 Iq2b:7
,2'5 b 1.0 - \7. 3~ i.OS~ ~.~4 7.'32 1'l4. \ c;2b.(
,300 ). 4 - 1\7.42 1.053 ~,sR '7. '3'3 '15. ~ ~ \ $?2
'1304 \ . s.? - \7.~4 LOS-\? c-" ~5 7*34 <1b.2 '1~4_b
\30"]
l :lUI 1
- 2. \ - \7.1~ \.055 PuM P ~~
".,1 7.35 9b ~ ~gq.9 1301? sme. T 5AMr Lf Co Il.L Ec , T1 ON
\3\3 SAf...fr Lf COfV rLfID~ ~
2 L :r 1Pe:c..
0.5 L :l: IP EG 1313 f'll M f O~c:
Equipment Equipment Used Identification #
YSI 556 MPS Reader and 5563 Sonde 4 turbidHy meter 2oo1o~2~3 NOTES AND OBSERVATIONS:
Depth and Depth to Water (DTW) measurements are given in feet from top of casing.
Groundwater Elevation measurements are given in feet ms!.
WELL ID: MW 32 - \ ~O SAMPLE ID: D 20 GZA GeoEnvironmental of New York Waterloo Sampling Data ~he~t CLIENT: Enlergy - IPEC PROJECT NO:
SITE: Bu7hanan. NY (\ I DATE:
WEATHER: c"t> J el¥ , S\1.qw u S ( 10 $ SAMPLER(S):
SAMPLING INTERVAL (depth in n below top of caslnl> TOTAL VOLUME PURGED:
0,),5 gal
\20,3 10 PURGE RATE: ~ (gall min)
SAMPLING PORT PURGE METHOD: Double Valve Pump
\go l WATER QUALITY:
- -ipccltJC Purged Volume Dissolved Turbidity DriveiVent Drive Pressure Time Temp ('lC) Conductivity pH (SU) ORP (gal) Oltygen (gil) (NTIJ) Cycle (sr:onds) (psi)
IS/em)
\ U ;~'C 0 PUMe nl'oJ "i?/<6 49
\\ no O. \ t q 19. I. b,9 \.44 b.'"\3 .- 2 \ 61 - I I' lO n . 2. 10. . I ~ I . '""~ q j*on c.. 99 -21'1.2 9.'2.7
, I \ C\ 0.25 \'1.ct-. \*(,9, o.~b 7.04 -2.\t?S ~A3 1120 o 30 I ~.q '1 l *'102 " .14- t 0 S- - 2 O~.-, ~ ...,~
I\ ~o 0 *35 1'1 .01 \. '105 O .S b l . oS? . - '-i?~. 2 9.90
\\?,C) O . 4~ \st.tO~ I. fn h o 4iS' "7 09 \80.9 ~. C1 S?
JLL\ 2 o . 4s" \ q .04 \.'10'" o LIZ 7. I' - (9 b.~ ~ . .,
11 C)o D ~ 50 \0 . 0 r \. 10 <1 o ~2 , . \:3 - 20 ,.-, ~ .'X~
12.00 O.c::.,O \~ ,Q9 l . '7nio 0.30 '7. 14 -1'1'1 . 0 Q .94 1'20 S- O .*f (') \ <2 . 9"1 \ . '7n t., 0 . ~O _1- l~{' - \9Ll.9 ~_~1 .... 11 It
\ 2. 0 ~ P U f.Jlf o~l=
17n i? _~t2."T ~t4Pl t= Go Ll IFe. 'r1 0" J I \
\2 ~3 ~()I LoM W=> L t:= TFl) *, 2 L "If II£. {M, Id 0 v o-v' ~ ~
\ 2 L\~ ~
\.
PLlMf' ~&=
Equipment Used Equipment Identification II YSI 556 MPS Reader and 5563 Sonde 4-turbidity meter Z.OnIO L, 2 ~ ~
WELL ID: MW ~ -113 SAMPLE ID: 0' "
GZA GeoEnvironmental
, of New York Waterloo Sampling Data She~t CLIENT: Entergy - IPEe PROJECT NO: 01.0017869.92 /
SITE: Buchanan. NY t ( DATE: 6/9 10 WEATHER: C IQ s>d { , Shov..JCf> I 70 5. SAMPLER(S):
SAMPLING INTERVAL (depth In n below top or casing) TOTAL VOLUME PURGED:
D.70 gal
\'2S!~ to \74.3 PURGE RATE: variable (gall min)
SAMPLING PORT PURGE METHOD: Double Valve Pump
\13 2 WATER QUALITY:
Specific Purged Volume Dissolved Turbidity DrivelVent Drive Pressure Time Temp (0C) Conductivity pH (SU) ORP (gal) Oxygen (g/I) (NTU) Cycle (seconds) (psi)
(Slcm)
,\05U 0 PUMf o f'-l of? I S? 4g
'\ on 0,1 \ '1.2-"" 1.9,9 1.55 7.40 -'21.~ -
\110 Q.2 1'1 .2S , 9 =39 o.,~ 7.25 - \24*,
I\IS- 0.25 "LIG:, ,. '131 ~o ._h2. /.21 -'2S.3 9.Q7
\ '2.0 {) .30 Ict . \g \ .cr 3 2 0,5'0 7 . It.. -12'1?b ~"93
, \ :\ 0 0.3S I Q , . 20 \. '1 4 I 0.3(, '7 . IS - \ 30. 9 ~.<?~
_11 3 c:;- o.it 0 19.22 ,.94ro 0.32.. 7.14 - \ ~2.0 i?_ *~7 1142 O . LlS' \ '1 . I '1 \ ~ f,3 0.30 -, \3 .- \ ~2.2 ~ . 99
\ \ So 0.55 \ q. t S' 1.9, l.. I) 2~ 7 . 12- - \ 3 0*4 ~.94 ... , .. I
\ , 52 PLlMf o+:{:
\ \ S5 .5:r"na. i SAUP! I ~ Colt ~\1n. fJ i 223 S.t\f.H'LE CoMt' Lf: ITt) .
2 L ':l:1" ~C (, fv1 \ 11 OV04-l ~.r
./
\22~ PUMP _Qff-Equipment Used Equipment Identification 1#
YSJ 556 MPS Reader and 5563 Sonde 5'_
turbidity meter 2nnlo4?93 NOTES AND OBSERVATIONS: f'I1r d Q v (Y(i f?- ( 50) V\A eIe .
WELLID: MW 32 -\49 SAMPLE ID: <0 \ Q GZA GeoEnvironmental
, of New York Waterloo Sampling Data ~he~t CLIENT:
SITE:
WEATHER:
Entergy - !PEC Buchanan. NY CJovdy \ S
~
OWtA"S I Jo .>
\
PROJECT NO:
DATE:
SAMPLER(S):
01.0017869.92 c:;l 4 ',0 SAMPLING INTERVAL (depth in n below top of culnl> TOT AL VOLUME PURGED:
0 . 75 gal
\47. 3 to PURGE RATE: ~ (gall min)
SAMPLING PORT PURGE METHOD: Double Valve Pump 149 3 WATER QUALITY:
Purged Volume Specific Dissolved Turbidity DrivelVenl Drive Pressure Time Temp 1°C) Conductivity pH (SU) ORP (gal) (S/em) Oxygen (gil) (NTU) Cycle (seconds) (psi)
\0 S'b 49
\ \ 00 I~ . \~ I.S\u. 2 .02 J
,,' C o oS 1'1. I ~ I 50~ i .02
<D. \ ,9 0 \ I . 5 \D o~ ~ 9
\ \ 20 _0 I S" c.. <j?c\ I 5 h.I q. 2 0
, , ~ 0 0 . 20 \ '1 . \ \ I. S5 ? n . -~ 5
\ I .~ S" 0.25
\ \ Y2 o 3_0 1C\ . i3 \.'570050 7 . 0 - \S 4 . f- 'i1 '7 l.
\ \ ~D o 3~ \ q .o~ I . ~Q3 (), 4 I 1200 o ~O
\ 20 c;- D . S-D ,g .o)? \ . S~~ 0 2.. '~
I C\ . \ \ \ . SG t, O , :~ 2-O.Go \ '1 . I 2 l . 51 b . ( J 3'
, 2\~
121,
\ 2 '")2 Equipment Used Equipment Identification t YSI 556 MPS Reader and 5563 Sonde 2 turbidity meter 20n -'0_42 Cf5
~OTES AND OBSERVATIONS: I'" 1 I (J Q va.. (-+\e r S ~p (e .
WELLID: MW~-~
SAMPLE ID: 02 ,
GZA GeoEnvironmental of New York Waterloo Sampling Data ~heet CLIENT: Entergy . !PEC PROJECT NO:
SITE: Buchanan. NY ~ I DATE:
WEATHER: Cia"" eli, s ouler $ 705= SAMPLER(S):
SAMPLING INTERVAL (depth in n below top or caslua) TOTAL VOLUME PURGED:
1.35 gal 79.3 to 92. if PURGE RATE: ~ (gall min)
SAMPLING PORT PURGE METHOD: Double Valve Pump WATER QUALITY:
SpecifiC Purged Volume Dissolved Turbidity Drive/Vent Drive Pressure Time Temp (0e) Conductivity pH (SU) ORP (gal) Oxygen (gil) (NTU) Cycle (seconds) (psi)
(S/em)
\ 0 t;-o 0 P U f-A P O~ ~ I~ 4C\
\ \OC)
'_LID 0,25 n.4~
\9.07 \.fo47 t R '1l.4. \. b qll LI. 13 3_.l4
- 7. \ 7 7.1~ _
-24 , 4
~C:;.L.
- I
\ \\ S" 0.5 S- \Q.9\' \ . 64 \ 2. St'\ 7,2.\ - -474.-. S 7 -c,li.
I) 20 0 '10 \9 00 \ . C-.4Lt 2.zC" 7 21 - 4~. I f .<==11 U 30 0 . 9 S Iq.oO \. ~4~ \ .Q'2 7.2\ _ 4~. o.;? '7 . ~Cf 1\:3 5 , 0 S' \~ '9'? l.b4~ I.g, 7.22 _ lJ.C; .' 7. -~i
\\ L~ Z 1.20 \~ . q7 \. 6s1 I. <=1 ~ 7 . 22. -4S-.C> 7. 'i< 4 .. If .f' II ~~ PUMP ~r-lll(S" s;rn (l. r SAMi'l E CoLl EC...'nDN 1'2.0"3 C:;AM f' L E CoM ~LET8) .. 2- L ::rPF( ( MIl')
QuAtT1 ~
\
}
\ 203- PUMP ~F ---
Equipment Used Equipment Identification II YSI 556 :viPS Reader and 5563 Sonde 3 turbidity meter -crno 70429 3
~
~OTES AND OBSERVATIONS:
WELL ID: MW 32 - 59 SAMPLE ID: -----,-0",--,-'-==--__
GZA GeoEnvironmental of New York Waterloo Sampling Data ~het:t CLlENT: Enlergy - !PEC PROJECT NO:
SITE: Buchanan. N~ \ DATE:
WEATHER: C\oudi" I $>tQv..)~S ,Jo's SAMPLER(S):
SAMPLING INTERVAL (deptb in n below top or culDa) TOTAL VOLUME PURGED:
l .0 gal 2.~. 3 (0 6\.3 PURGE RATE: variable (gall min)
SAMPLING PORT PURGE METHOD: Double Valve Pump 59 WATER QUALITY:
Purged Volume SpecifiC Dissolved Turbidity Drive/Vent Drive Pressure Time Temp (oC) Conductivity pH (SU) ORP (gal) (stem) O"ygen (gil) (NTU) Cycle (seconds) (psi) o )( I J 25
.f j ,0 f \ '1 . () \ , -. 0 ~~ c.. .c....n "1. '2[... 2t
( U{)~ t>. \ 'j.2G
(",. ~ '-..u7 l.~o \ ..., c..
o 5 I~_IQ O.~.-=3' /.33 b S" 3 I.C-..Q 0.65 \Q.2..l O . ~'2c.
\'1.20 O.~22 c; 59 \ .bi
\43, \
J4s'3 Equipment Used Equipment Identillcation II YSI 556 W>>S Realfer and 5563 Sontle C; turbidity meter 2no, 04 2q 3
~OTES AND OBSERVATIONS:
WELL ID: MW 3!L -~
SAMPLE ID: 0 '2 3 GZA GeoEnvironmental of New York Waterloo Sampling Data ~he~t CLIENT: Entergy - IPEC PROJECT NO:
SITE: Buchanan. NY , DATE:
WEATHER: S \} hV1 <( 70 S" SAMPLER(S):
SAMPLING INTERVAL (depth iD It below top or culq) TOTAL VOLUME PURGED:
_i. . .o,-O___ gal 77.3 to ~5.4 PURGE RATE: ~ (gal / min)
SAMPLING PORT PURGE METHOD: Double Valve Pump WATER QUALITY:
Specitlc Purged Volume Dissolved Turbidity DrivcJVent Drive Pressure Time Temp lOC) Conductivity pH lSU) ORP (gal) Oxygen (gil) lNTU) Cycle ~seconds) (psi)
(S/em)
\tOD ~ / ; .30'~41
~\\O (()*O\ 2(..,.52- ~.'1 3 ) 4,20 c.. ,,9 I 3~,4 - G I' Cf 4~
'\ 2-0
' l ~D I) LtQ
\\ 4-~
~
co'S
.~ 5" o_t.,C; o~-,'5
- 2. Co.2b
- 26. -.:::.2-
- 2. 1,.., t'-.O 21.. 58
\,',22-I . t-,_
1,7o~
'1_4-
\ ' -7tO 7 2.95
~,5l\-
q ,'13
~L9b t-.. 9 ~
7 '~'1 7 ,'73
'7 . 79
~ 4.0 2/.7 4~,4 50,2...
--- P I//~
~'h2
'I
\ .~
I I
11-3 I \ SO Q. -'8_5 2.(., s4 \,'lob -(2 ~ '1 '7 , S\ 5/, I ....-- 4- 33
\. \ 5 \ PUM f' oFF
\ \ 53 S 17\fl 'T SAM PLE Co lLECTl O,.,J I
\'2.\9 ~AM IPLE: C<: )A-1 P L E 1 E T) ~ 2- L ;JdJz=:.c. rvll _ ~ (3 U OA,J" Tell:"
l'2..'~ p U fV1 r DFF Equipment Used Equipment Identification 1#
YSI 556 MPS Reader and 5563 Sonde turbidity meter
~OTES AND OBSERVATIONS:
- ~
WELLID: Mw~-69 SAMPLE ID: 03 '2 GZA GeoEnvironmental of New York Waterloo Sampling Data ~he~t CLIENT: Entergy - IPEC PROJECT NO:
SITE: Buchanan, NY \ DATE:
WEATHER: 5unVli (0 > SAMPLER(S):
SAMPLING INTERVAL (depth In n below top or caslq) TOTAL VOLUME PURGED:
_:...,;1.:,...;0:::::*:......-_gal 01.3 to 71. 3 PURGE RATE: ~ (gall min)
SAMPLING PORT PURGE METHOD: Double Valve Pump WATER QUALITY:
Specific Purged Volume Dissolved Turbidity DrivelVent Drive Pressure Time Temp (GC) Conductivity pH (SU) ORP (gal) Oxygen (gil) (NTU) Cycle (seconds) (psi)
(S/cm)
}lOO 0 ruM r,:>
010 ~ 1 ao~ 4\
\- \ /\ 0 0,0 \ 2. Go. -'J /J, 0.931..\ 'S?22. $(,2.c 23.52 .- ~ .E? 41
~ , 21) f)
- t 2.h.('s" , 3~O C1 1
:5 Q, G~
2 to ,Sl 2 .t-. ~
\ " '~'R \
\. ~gq
{ . L\. C.
~.i.i.L
~
Q
'Z.G::t
~)-
4q SCi I
'~
- " \?
or
\ \ 4s o .;s 2 c::, .45' I . '3'R \ q ' \ 41 ~,"?l\ -~D ,~- 33 I \
I I a::;;-o C; I o R5 2...6.43 \ * :3 b'q PuJ h(> ~t='r-:
9*47 '.3D C:, ) 2- - ... If 33 i \ 5?' s..n ~ e. T ,j...., ~{v' eLf Co L Lt::< ~ ilION
- rp ~L
\ '2-32 SA M P1.. t :OM'Pl E:TCtJ !: L L /VII ;:( WUQN' 'leA'
\"2- '32 PU 1M t' <oF F Equipment Used Equipment Identification II YSI 556 MPS Reader and 5563 Sonde ~
turbidity meter SOTES AND OBSERVATIONS:
WELL ill: MW -..aL -~
SAMPLE ID: ---"- 0_2_4<---_
GZA GeoEnvironmental
, of New York Waterloo Sampling Data ~he~t CLIENT: Enlergy - IPEC Buchanan. NY , PROJECT NO:
DATE:
OI.OO17869, ~
G J '7 I) 0 SITE:
WEATHER: SJY7 ,()'i ]0 So SAMPLER(S): "'lB I SAMPLING INTERVAL (depth in ft below top or casing) TOT At VOLUME PURGED:
1.'30 gal 5S,~ to 63.~
PURGE RA TE: ~ (gal / min)
SAMPLING PORT PURGE METHOD: Double Valve Pump 63 WATER QUALITY:
Specific Purged Volume Dissolved Turbidity Drive/Venl Drive Pressure Time Temp ( Ile) Conductivity pH (SU) ORP (gal) Ol{ygen (gil) (NTU) Cycle (]ecomls) (psi)
(Slcm)
~O '30 ("") .poM Ie o~ c;, 7 2~
jolt 0 l o.c:;n O,oS 0*15
,g,T?
70*29 ,
I.S2S
~\ ~
S' l12 4 . ~(")
7*Li
',.\ 4-
- S .~
+ '~"I
- -, I iO .31.0
\ \ DO O.~O \ Cf. ~ 5 \.520 2. ~Cf /. I 2- j 'L 2- ~ .Ik, 1105 0 .40 20.2'7 \ .S20 2.00 '1 II 2b . I l._"il~
\ \ I ~
i \ 22
~l~
{)
- 5S O , r5 O-G S' 2n.\9 20.2b
- 20. (,,0 l . S~~
\ . 5bo I.S~O 2 ,0 b
- 2. \ \
- 2. \ 0 I . to
. \ \
(. \ t
?,:>, ~
- 40. '>?
'-l2 . S 5.45"
.S ,32-5:~S '1 LQ ~2 II
\ \
\' 3 ~ \ .05 20.be., , , S'1l.\ 2.\1 7 1\ L4 3 I S.2Q '\ I
_L\ f\ '-I I I I S' 20.5'1 I ,bO~ 2,'-0 '1 . \ I 4Q,4 5.27 ¥
) \ it t; PLl tv1 f' O+:~
\\4c., S lL\(2.. T :::'AlJlf LE Col l~C. Tl 0 \l
\ 2. \9 .s AM Pl E CoMI ~l ~ T£t) . 2 ~
L ::tfE< M,d Q0OX"n: ,(,
\2\'1 PUMP Qlf'r ~
Equipment Used Equipment Identification #I YSI 556 MPS Reader and 5563 Sonde 5 turbidity meIer 20CY104293
~OTES AND OBSERVATIONS: ,.,.1, d QlJCA[ t e( 5a. V\I\ f \e
WELL ID: MW ~ - A..j SAMPLE ID: 024 GZA GeoEnvironmental
, of New York Waterloo Sampling Data Shet:t CLIENT: Entergy - IPEC PROJECT NO:
SITE: Buchanan. NY \ DATE:
WEATHER: Sv VI '0 i 70 > SAMPLER(S):
SAMPLING INTERVAL (depth ia n below top or culu.> TOTAL VOLUME PURGED:
2.\0 gal 34.~ to 49_~
PURGE RATE: ~ (gall min)
SAMPLING PORT PURGE METHOD: Double Valve Pump 49 WATER QUALITY:
Specific Purged Volume Dissolved Turbidity DriveiVent Drive Pressure Time Temp (DC) Conductivity pH (SU) ORP (gal) Oxygen (gil) (NTU) Cycle lseconds) (psi)
(S/em) 103.0 0 f'uMf O~t...J ~ ..., 2 'R 1D l.~O 0:,2..0 \S<.h9 1*~Qf) 3 \7 7.02 -~ C) .--. "7'1 I 0 30
\ C ~O \ f< q h \ , ~OO :~ / . 0 ,"':> +'~* . O i' 0.70 02 00 l.iO Ii\'.41 \ .519 ~.30 7.01-. t::l4 '7 ct?90
\ ~ 05 \ *45 I <K.qu.- I S49 * ~.*~3 7. 0 c:; C;,.~ Q .p;f
\ I { :3 1* '15 \ Q . '1 \ I . .::; 7 L\. .=1. ~ 4 7 04. Sf. \ g .~ C-, ,,If ..... ~
I I \ 5 (/\JIV\ ID Dr-~
\ \ \I STI!\' "\ SAt-, A PLf. rd b LL~('_'Tl ( ~r0 i \ 3 (') SL\M( 'L E CD M P L E 'T"'1: In ~
, 2. L rl1l£c. Jv1\ d Gh )C&A "Tee t \ 30 Pl'Mr <5 'f'~
Equipment Used Equipment Identification' YSI 556 .\1PS Reader and 5563 Sonde 4-turbidit,y meter 2 001042_'13
~OTES AND OBSERVATIONS: M\~ Guo,...(1-e ( S ~ pie.. .
WELL ID: MW .aL -~
SAMPLE lD: Q24 GZA GeoEnvironmental
, of New York Waterloo Sampling Data ~he~t CLIENT:
SITE:
Entergy - !PEC Buchanan, NY , PROJECT NO:
DATE:
01.001 7869.92/
Ibl:r lo WEATHER: 5l,)(\ V) .....( '] 0 s SAMPLER(S):
I SAMPLING INTERVAL (depth In n below top or culna) TOTAL VOLUME PURGED:
1.40 gal 10 j5,4-PURGE RATE: ~ (gal/ min)
SAMPLING PORT PURGE METHOD: Double Valve Pump WATER QUALITY:
Purged V o l u m e S - p e c f f i c Dissolved Turbidity DrivelVent Drive Pressure Time Temp (oC) Conductivity pH (SU) ORP (gal) (S/cm) Ollygen (gil) (NTU) Cycle ~econds) (psi)
.~17 ?~
, I I0 .~ ("'I
,b So 0 _\ n i £1 , q n 2 n R~ :=3. 4 \ I , a"l - -, l.... '4 \
, \ 00 0.2..0 1'1.?'2 2, I DO 3, '1 9 '7,05< '. ,~C\, 2 g. '1Cf
\ \ 0 5" ("). '3 5 \ Cl (,..., \ '7. , n g l... ~ _~l {O ~ - \ 7 , '7 Q ,~ 9 Equipment Used Equipment Identification l#
YSI 556 ,\liPS R ead~ Jnd 5563 Sonde 2-turbidi ty met~ 2.00-1042 '13
- 'IIOTES AND OBSERV,.\ TIONS: N\ \ J Q lJa.v' t e..( ~ r \e.
WELL ID: N\ tAl . . 3~
GZA GeoEnvironmental of New York SAMPLE -\t: 0 ,2 0 Low-Flow Sampling Data Sheet CLIEN T: Entergy - IPEC PROJEC T NO: 01.0017869.92 SITE: Buchanan. NY 1 DATE: 5/ 20 110 WEATH ER: M ~ frJV) V)j 70 S SAMPL ER(S):
PUMP DEPTH :
WATE R QUALITY: DTW= 7 :T1 Transdu cer Actual Depth ::::. l7." ~ f~.~<i';: \OSS \
S ~c itlc Dissolv ed EL . a , A DTW..oc Temp pH Time Turbidity Flow Rate Nott~'
Conductivity Oxygen
.QCtUal Depth ~ ~oC) ORP rH20
\ CD , \ \1 . l"Q (Slcm) (WI)
(SU) (NTU) (gaVhr)
.~
0
~o'l \(~~ 4 f"UM If O IV
,e 2-7 \ 7.(;,0 0 \c.. .04 D . ~~3 4.4 3 "7.0 S' ... '53*7 - 1. 0 I r; 31 \7 . S~o \ b .<5\ O
- bl( , .95 / *09 *- 107. 10 La 4'1 , 7 . 5\'0 t7 . 0~ D. 615 \ . ~Q " 43 7 . 12. - 13 . ..., I i . ~' O . Z-10 '54 (7. 5~2 17*37 0.67 4 \.63 _7 * \ , -16 .4 9 . 52
'n 03 11 . 59 \ \1 "&0 0.67 2 \. 5"2 I . f 3 .. ((, .7 to . 5 2
" ,3 \ 7. 5'}" J~ . 21 0.67 1 ,*Ltk _7. L3 .-g~ ., Q IO . lc2 II'~ 11.S~' ,\?A2. O. ~7' (.43 ",. \ 3 ~ ~5. 9 If'") 0 "1 tI'2..?> \ 7J.,9 S il? *5\ {) . Io -(o , _'+0 1. i L+ -1(7. i 10.0 2
' \ '2 ~
Ii .30
\1<~'1'S"
~(2.'
\ ,5"
~ 0 . b10 \.~ I 7.1~ ,- <i7.~ \0.\0
- sA vlf'l£ C O L LE< i-not J 0.5
\3 2. 5 SA~.*tf E ~ '-MpU~ l ~ \
- 2 L . If £.6:
0.'5 L I f EC.
l ~2 5" Pv tv\ {> OI=F Equipment Used Equip ment Identification #
YSI 556 MPS Reader and 5563 Sonde now meter 3 tu rhidity_meter tf..
2 00'7 0 4 2 9:5
~OTES AND OBSER VATIO NS:
Depth and Depth to Water (DTW) measurements are given in feet from Total volume purged 0.0 5 gal top of casing.
Ground water Elevation measurements are given in feet msl.
WELL lD: LA E- OOl GZA GeoE nviro nmen tal of New York SAMPLE lD: 0 \ '3 Low-Flow Sam pling Data Sheet CLIEN T: Entergy* IPEC PROJECT NO:
SITE: Bu!:hanan. NY \
WEATHER: Sy 11 -\- (' 0 J JS \ DATE:
01.0017869.92
... .J \ ~ I \0 Go 5 SAMPLER(S):
PUMP DEPTH: _ _ _ _ _ _ _ ft WATE R QUALITY: DTW= 74.2 5 Transducer Actual Depth CnT9 r Temp Specific Dissolved Dri veNent Drive
~~
Time Conductivity Oxygen pH Turbidity Actual Depth (oC) (SU) ORP Cycle Pressure (S/e m) 1I!!1l (NTU)
(seaonds) (psi) t-L,o '~u
\0"33 *7 4 .2S Pu ~p ~tV h ---,12 \ ,S O 0
\0 _5 0 7 Lf .25 17., 0 - - ~L94 \Q\ . 2 - 00\
, \ 00 '1Y . 21 \1.\'7 2 40\ 9 :, , ~ .c5~ 174 . 2 -
\ \0'1 7~ . 30 \C) 6\ 2 CoIC: ~ . lO c:. .S- 0 \ '\2 \ 9.<?7 i 1, '7 114 .-32 \~ . 7q 2 .bO( ' S? 3 7 t .. L. . 7 '$?"'-, 1\0.2 '2
() ._L{}
\ '-'2' 7 4 .35 1\(, : 1 1 1..6 l \ S.40 6 . 4'7 4~ ~ .LlS
\ \ 3S 1 ~ .--j~ \ / 12 2.60 \ 4 . 2 4 t-~ . i4 4 ~~.2 '1 .2. ?
- o. _'~_5 1\ 1.4 l\ -,.
7Li .4 2 \ (.,~ 2.59 9 :=3 . ~2 G i:~4 '32 .2 Ci . "?o V-
, 1 S , 74.4 5 \7.'iN~ 2 . ~O~ 2. gC; b '4b '2.9. G., '1.'74 (;124 10 . 20
\ \ S C, 7 4.~){ \ 7 , ~'1 2
- 60S ' z.~~ 6.4( ' 29.0 I ~ .-19 "
120 , 74 .50 i '? .'04 2 .6 f'\ 3 2.*~O (), L\ 7 '2 ~ :.s G. <Q \
1<.,11\(2. T SAJv1 r l E Co l CL It inN
'-IiI
,,. Q .2 S
' 202
\ 3A << SAM t: lE rot- 1\ r l ~ n
, 2 L 0.5 L
- r: IPFC.
' I P~c.
\ 3 '-14 "UK P QF~
Equip ment Used Equip ment Identification #
YSI 556 MPS Reauer :.IIld 5563 Sonde turhidity meter 5' 200 '1 0 429 3
~OTES AND OBSERVATIONS:
Depth anu Depth to Water (DTW) measurements are given in feet from Total volume purgeu \). Li 0 gal top of ~as ing .
Groundwater Ele vation mea\urerm:nts are given in feet msl.
WELL 10: MW hQ - ~
SAMPLE lD: 0 13 GZA GeoEnvironmental of New York Waterioo Sampling Data ~heet CLIENT:
SITE:
Enlergy . !PEC Bu~ hll1lap, NY \ I PROJECT NO:
DATE:
01.0011869.92 5~O t 10 WEATHER: Mo$1 '1 5UVl YlT, vJ Vld ( 60 $ SAMPLER(S):
SAMPLING INTERVAL (depth in ft below top of cuma) TOTAL VOLUME PURGED:
Q. S' 5" gal 170.'3 10 200.4-PURGE RATE: ~ (gall min)
SAMPLING PORT PURGE METHOD: Double Valve Pump
\Jb WATER QUALITY:
Specific Purged Volume Dissolved Turbidity DriveIVent Drive Pressure Time Temp ('lC) Conductivity pH (SU) ORP (gal) Oxygen (gil) lNTU) Cycle (seconds) (psi)
(Skm) 1\ nS("b c('") t' l? Mt nN G I S 31
'\ .f on o 0 \ t~ . 5~ 0 .,-,2 2 . ::&\ ~. 2 Z. -~ 1 - I'
\ \ 0 s- 0.05 \ 5 .<iSS" a:Tl) 2 . ~o Q . (j-e ~. t., .=3 £.. C\ .~ 7
\ \ \ ~ O . \n \h . 2S' Q') ,-l b S- L C::;~ '7 _
- 2. \
D o
(}1'3'
. 2n
\6 . S,,"
I b . (") 2-0*"7 b 2..
0 . , (... \
\. \I O . ~~
7.75, 7.44
._~.Cl
~~
}I.:7 I
- 95~.f/(
\I l.\ 0 o . 2S 1c, .b9 O .f (., \ 0 . ,0 '7. '"' U. - -, \.~ ~,U i' ~ o 0 .30 \ , .. , <;( I 0.<160 O , Sc... I . ,4 ~7~ ~ . I q
\ I S5 0.35 \ b S?7 O ./htJ o. ~S' I . '7C .. ._ ~.u. .4 ~. \ o
\2o ~ o 40 , &,,'10 0 .'7 59 0.54 I '79 _C:j 1.\ S? . \ t.. ~" -~
\ 2 04- Pu(v1 e oFP
\ 20 b sThtl.'l <SAM ~ Lf CoLl£ ~1l<9N
" ~2 9 ~AM rLE COMpj 1£'tB)
- 2. L :::tt'F ~
o.S' 1 '-:-tf'-f II"
\3 29 !PuMP C It-=F Equipment Used Equipment Identincatlon II YSI 556 .'vIPS Reader :md 5563 Sonde I lumidity meIer 2 0 0 '70 L.f 2 '1' 3
- 'tIOTES .\NO OBSF.RVA nONS:
WELLID: MW-6D-~
SAMPLE ID: 0 \3 GZA GeoEnvironmental of New York Waterloo Sampling Data ~heet CLIENT: Enlergy . !PEC PROJECT NO: 01.0017869.9'2, SITE: Buchanan. NY \ \ DATE: S1 \0 \0 WEATHER: M.Sy ,,,,,J . '.~.h "d" hQ 5 SAMPlER(S):
T' -r SAMPLING INTERVAL (deptb mn below top oleum&) TOTAL VOLUME PURGED:
- 1. <9 5" gal
\47.4 10 PURGE RA TE: ~ (gal / min)
SAMPLING PORT PURGE METHOD: Double Valve Pump 2.
WATER QUALITY:
SpecifiC Purged Volume Dissolved Turbidity DrivelVent Drive Pressure Time Temp (0e) Conductivity pH (SU) ORP (gal) Oxygen (gil) (NTU) Cyde (seconds) (psi)
(S/cm) J
\OSb J'..u Me ON 6 15 31
\\nn I~n~
0 ,0 0 .2 0
\ 14 :7 2
\4"1\
I .'l? 3?'
L<6(' ~
\ .(0 o _ ~o
~
~ _-lf
.-71 -Ib.9
_1'.\
lo,9'l(
I
\ \ \ '3 0.4 \4 , 2 , - ~_~ G. o. 4~ G.~':i -/1 . 4 .., . 2~
\ I 2. \ O .h \ 4. ~2 1.9,0, 0.36 7 .0 t - 5~.u. fs".IS
\ \ '?In r. . <;? 5 14 .1 \? 1.9 It-4 o.3a 1 . O't.? -. Sf.,:3 '}. b"3 l \ 4a \ 0 \ L\ .bS \ .C1hS< n .29 , . I c;- _t.."'7 . 1 7.09 11 So I 2 \,4."72 1. 9 b'1 0.2.1 7 I k' -. ,t&: .2 .~ . \? Sl
\ \ S5 , 4 \4.74 \ .9b 9 025 I r'9 _1{L .b 6.<;0 J 2 o~ I. b L~ , 7ci 1 . ~b7 0.25 7.20 -'X>2.2 6 . rb 12 0 5? \ . 1? \ ~ 1? I \ '1 be; 0.2.4 7 . 2..1 - 'f( 4. '7 f) 72 f1 ~
1 2o~ f_uM() . o£-~
12,0 c~e. r _~t-J }LF Co .l E-<: 1\0 fJ
_\ 2 32 c;s,.Af...,f ~ LE Col ~ eU~TI( ~ 2- L ':l:f :EC
~
<D . .s L :r ( 'E_C.
12 _3"z (J LJ (v1 P of F Equipment Used Equipment Identification If YSI 556 ... IPS ReaJer Jnd 5563 Sonde b rurbl(J ily meIer 200 '10429:3
~OTES .\ND 08SF.RVAfIONS:
WELL ID: MW bQ -135 SAMPLE ID: D \3 GZA GeoEnvironmental of New York Waterloo Sampling Data ~heet CLIENT: Enlergy . !PEC PROJECT NO:
SITE: Buchanan. NY 1 DATE:
WEATHER: ::2"o n1' w !1d Y
\ 6_ ......
~ ..
" SAMPLER(S):
SAMPLING INTERVAL (depth In n below lop or asia&) TOTAL VOLUME PURGED:
- 1. 55 gal
\ 2 Lj .~ 10 \'='1.4 PURGE RATE: ~ (gall min)
SAMPLING PORT PURGE METHOD: Double Valve Pump
\35 3 WATER QUALITY:
Specific Purged Volume Dissolved Turbidity DrivdVenl Drive Pressure Time (gal) Temp ("C) Conductivity pH ISU) ORP Oxygen (g/I) (NTIJ) Cycle (~econdS) (psi)
IS/em)
\ oSU G /5 3
\, 0 0 o. , 5 .40 f
\ \o~ o* i~ -hI. g I ~ . 21 l
\ \ I 3 o 2~ 7 . \ $? -~ . 2 \0 . 02
\4 4C-. '2 . 1 '7C~ 0.39 7.37 -lo ~ .9 ~. o4-
\, 30 n ', l " ) \ L1 . -;r, ~ 2 . 2o\( 0 , 2 '"' - \ \ ~ ,S 0 .90 ILL34 2 . 2bO 0.20 '7.4 0 :> . itS
'1 Sb I i 4.0 20 lu . 40 2.2/0 C , I '1 -I 3 q. ~
.- \ Q2. 0
.=39 lQ , 4 "1
, , S' b
\ 2.. 2 , SAMPl+ GJI--(PJ ,:: llEh 2. L 0.;) L
, 2 2. \
Equipment Used Equipment Identincation ,
YSI 556 ."IPS ReaJer Jnd 5563 Sonde 3 turhid ity meter 20n'lo ~ 29-3
- \'OTES .'NO 08SERVA nONS:
WELL 10: MW ~- 72 SAMPLE ID: 0 \3 GZA GeoEnvironmental of New York Waterioo Sampling Data ~heet CLIENT: Enlergy . !PEC PROJECT NO:
SITE: Buchanan. NY ,. DATE:
WEATHER: tv1 . Suo'()i ) v"tl rJ 4i 60 S SAMPLER(S):
SAMPLING INTERVAL (depth Ia ft below top or cula&) TOTAL VOLUME PURGED:
3,15 gal 10 PURGE RATE: ~ (gall min)
SAMPLING PORT PURGE METHOD: Double Valve Pump
- 12 WATER QUALITY:
Speciftc Purged Volume Diswlved Turbidity DriveIVent Drive Pressure, Time Temp ('lC) Conductivity pH (SU) ORP (gal) O'lygm (gil) lNTU) Cycle (seconds) (psi)
(Slcm)
) 0 50 P0M P ON G ,I s '3 1
,\ 00 O.*2. C , LL ~2 4 .s-c..~ L b~ '1.D~ ~34.0 15 . ~ -,,-
\. \os o. 40 \ 4 47 4 . 401 0.9\ 7.2-& .- 24.~ \ 3 . ;0
\, ,~ ,0 75 \ 4 . 4s- U . 2 :2*d~.. o.c,~ 7.3r - b.2. I ( ~5'
\ \ 2- \ \ . I El 14 .l4 4 l..j 12..~ 0 . 5"0 7. L\ \ + 5.3 {1. 02.
\}3~ _t . ~~o IA . 3~ 4 . o1?K' o ..c::;n /.4.3 4-\7.\ 1020
\ \ 40 2.00 iU: 42 b, 0 .\:)9 0 . 4 4- 7, LIS 1-+29:'1 ~. G:j7J
\150
, , ss-2.G.o
.~.oE)
\ 4 5'0 11 040 O . LJ2 14 ..51 4 . 03b 0 . 41 7.4(..
7.4-7 1*4.~
~~2.~
- r. I .., . ~C1
~ .~ ., ... I;
\ \ E:\b fuM (' Oft='
\\ ~ Ji?
- '2..\ \
5~(l\
SAM fLE COM Pl E rr\') .,. Z L TPEC.
O .S L :fi5E c
\2 ,1 PtJ~P IQF(:
Equipment Used Equipment Identification' YSI 556 .\lIPS Reader and 5563 Sonde 2 turbidity meIer 2 00/04293
~on:s AND OBSERVATIONS:
WEl~ 10: MWG!:L - 53 SAMPLE 10: 0 I3 GZA GeoEnvironmental of New York Waterloo Sampling Data ~heet CLIENT: PROJECT NO:
SITE: DATE:
WEATHER: SAMPLER(S): M. WS SAMPLING lNTERVAL (depth In ft below top of culnl> TOTAL VOLUME PURGED:
1.45 gal ljs.4 to 59.4 PURGE RATE: ~ (gall min)
SAMPLING PORT PURGE METHOD: Double Valve Pump 53 WATER QUALITY:
Purged Volume ) SpecifiC Dissolved Turbidity DtiveiVent Drive Pressure Time Temp \1 C) Conductivity pH (SU) ORP (gal) (Skm) Oxygen (gil) (NTU) Cycle (sFonds) (psi)
\42., .t.:) ./ 7 20
\ 4-::::',0 o.n5' IS.'i? 2 3 . \o~ r. £+ \ '- -ZT . \ 5 f1 *7 2. 2.
o.; s tS 32 3 , o~3 1.5 6 7 . IS- ~9 .2 ~ .97 (
0,3'0 \ t:\.4Q .~ , 04'7 1 . 34- .J.. () ."9 <1. hI f). 50 \ 5' . 3'1 3.0 \ q /.49 (0. 15 0 .10 I. b3 f.CSI
' 503 I.b4
\ .0 \5'.22 :~ . o 0 4 C; . lnO I . \ \,;l"\ 7,C)9 ~2 . 5 ';:).54
\ S'J Sl \.3 \ 5 .2(; :3 . 0 0 0 l . b9 (,5'9 33 . 4 h . S7
\5\ q 0.5 Equipment Used Equipment Identification ,.
YS/ 556 \-/PS Reader and 5563 Sonde 2-curhldity meier 2oolo~2'1~
~()TES .\ND 08SF.RVA nONS:
WELL 10: MW.b.Q - ~
SAMPLE ID: 0 \?
GZA GeoEnvironmental of New York Waterioo Sampling Data ~heet CLIENT: PROJECT NO: 01.0017869.92 SITE: DATE: 5 1\0 / 10 WEATHER: SAMPlER(S): M, Bg,Crt:>$
SAMPLING lNTERV AL (dtptb mft below top of cumll TOT AL VOLUME PURGED:
I 05 gal 24,9 to 39,4 PURGE RATE: ~ (gall min)
SAMPLING PORT PURGE METHOD: Double Valve Pump 3'5 7 WATER QUALITY:
Specific Purged Volume Dissolved Turbidity Drive/Vent Drive Pressure Time Temp 1°C) Conductivity pH (SU) ORP (gal) O"ygen (gil) INTU) Cycle (~econds) (psi)
(S/em)
\ 4 L3 0 Ptl~ IP ON 5 / 7 20
\ ~30 o. \ S- \S,23 ,3 . 23 1. '99 6. 9~ 2 5'C :~ - 5 'f, '1 22..
\ l..\3S- 0 . 2 0 )SA.S 3 . 1C,4 2 . 02 7 . ~' \ ,?{9.3 l?OS
\ q4 \ (') 3(\ \5.bL- 3 . 1 \ q ?l'\4 ~.Ob q9\ C;.3*7
' Ll Sb 0.40 \ f-" I q 3.0'1 \ 2 .02- Q 03 'L~.9 4 21
'\ 4155 n.~[) \ b _2" ~.D5~ 2.01 -, ~1 ~ , 2 ~ .g c..
l S03 o bO \ (; 4Q .1020 2 .z,." 2- 7c:.4 - 3 . f'.) ~.5~
IS O)? o In Ie,. 50 ~.ooo 2 . 5S 7.60 - ~3 . )( =3.4'7 15"13 ().$?O \fJ.4C, 2.9bl 2 . c... O , , ~o - 3 ,4 3.39 I S, ~ o ~o \ b.4-i 2. 9 43 2,6 '2 "1 s-9 3.0 ~. 42-1 5 19 PUM~ o.r~
~e.T SAMfl C
\520 Is 5x sAM PLI CnM L[nt\ .
CDI !CC"_TIO"J 2.. L ~I I-C-0 .5 L LI" I-- C
\ 5 (v oJ PuMP oF {:"
Equipment Used Equipment Identification' YSI 556 .'vIPS Reader and 5563 Sonde 3 twbidhy meter 2 00T70_~ 2 Cj 3
~OTES .\ND 08S[RVATIONS:
FINAL QUARTERLY LONG-TERM GROUNDWATER MONITORING REPORT Q2 2010 (REPORT NO. 10)
APPENDIX F: DOSE CALCULATIONS
Facility Groundwater Flux Calculation Site Indian Point Prepared By: JAS Job No. 17869.92 Reviewed By: mjb Parameter Values:
Totals Total Catchment Total Improved Zone Zone (ft^2) (ft^2) Recharge (ft/yr) Precipitation (ft/yr) 3,969,765 1,432,972 0.83 3.18 year Surface Area 2010 Unit 3 North Unit 3 South Northern Clean Zone Unit 2 North Improved Unit 1/2 Improved Improved Zone Improved Zone Southern Clean Improved (ft^2) Zone (ft^2) Zone (ft^2) (ft^2) (ft^2) Improved Zone (ft^2) 0 148,214 433,904 316,210 321,290 213,354 Northern Clean Unit 3 North Unit 3 South Unimproved Zone Unit 2 North Unimproved Unit 1/2 Unimproved Unimproved Zone Unimproved Zone Southern Clean Zone (ft^2) Zone (ft^2) Zone (ft^2) (ft^2) (ft^2) Unimproved (ft^2) 106,429 204,317 438,221 323,116 268,862 585,600 Discounted Area Discounted Area Within Discounted Area Discounted Area Discounted Area Discounted Area Within Within Zone Zone Within Zone Within Zone Within Zone Zone 50,265 0 291,186 106,718 17,730 144,347 Unit 3 North Northern Clean Zone Unit 2 North Catchment Unit 1/2 Catchment Catchment Zone Unit 3 South Zone Southern Clean Zone Catchment (ft^2) Zone (ft^2) Zone (ft^2) (ft^2) (ft^2) (ft^2) 156,694 352,531 1,163,311 746,044 607,882 943,302 Activity (pCi/L)
Groundwater Northern Clean Zone Catchment Unit 2 North Unit 1/2 Unit 3 North Unit 3 South Zone Southern Clean Zone Upper Zone Before Canal 150 337 4,088 399 711 184 Lower Zone Before Canal 150 239 3,077 1,326 536 183 Northern Clean Zone Unit 2 North Unit 1/2 Unit 3 North Unit 3 South Zone Southern Clean Zone Lower Upper Zone Zone 150 256 3,290 322 711 184 After After Canal Canal 150 492 968 521 536 183 Stormwater Discharging to Canal (pCi/L)
Storm Water for Storm Water for Unit 2 Storm Water for Unit Storm Water for Storm Water for Storm Water for Northern Clean Zone North 1/2 Unit 3 North Unit 3 South Southern Clean Zone 1,831 0 1,119 377 NA Avg MH-4a NA Avg CB-14 and CB-34 Avg U3-CB-B8 Avg D1, C3, E6, & E10 Stormwater Discharging to River (pCi/L)
Storm Water for Storm Water for Unit 2 Storm Water for Unit Storm Water for Storm Water for Storm Water for Northern Clean Zone North 1/2 Unit 3 North Unit 3 South Southern Clean Zone 129 0 0 201 NA Avg. MH-1 and MH-12 Avg MH-14 Avg CB-15 NA Avg E13,CB-C2 Potential Water Received by Storm Drain System
=(Improved Area) x Precipitation Northern Clean Area Unit 2 North Unit 1/2 Unit 3 North Unit 3 South Southern Clean Zone Units 0 470,579 1,377,646 1,003,968 1,020,094 677,400 ft^3/yr 0 1,289 3,774 2,751 2,795 1,856 ft^3/day 0.00 6.70 19.61 14.29 14.52 9.64 GPM 0 13,325,316 39,010,581 28,429,198 28,885,854 19,181,845 L/Yr The total amount of water available to be received by the storm system is computed as the combined area of buildings and paved areas in the catchment multiplied by the annual precipitation rate. Note this conservatively assumes that the amount of water lost to the atmosphere or other sinks after precipitation has fallen on paved or built up surfaces is zero.
Water Directly Recharged to Aquifer from Precipitation
=Unimproved Area x Recharge Northern Clean Area Unit 2 North Unit 1/2 Unit 3 North Unit 3 South Southern Clean Zone Units 87,857 168,664 361,752 266,732 221,946 483,413 ft^3/yr 241 462 991 731 608 1,324 ft^3/day 1.25 2.40 5.15 3.80 3.16 6.88 GPM 2,487,841 4,776,030 10,243,665 7,553,005 6,284,809 13,688,731 L/Yr Note that this calculation reflects recharge to the aquifer in non-paved areas. The Recharge value listed above and used in this calculation reflects only that portion of precipitation that actually recharges the aquifer.
J:\17,000-18,999\17869\17869-92.MG\Q2-2010\Dose Calculations\
Appendix F - Q2 2010-dose calcs_FINAL.xlsx; Rainfall_model_H3 Page 1 of 3 Print Date: 1/21/2011
Facility Groundwater Flux Calculation Site Indian Point Prepared By: JAS Job No. 17869.92 Reviewed By: mjb Water Recharged to Aquifer (Direct Recharge Plus Storm Water Leakage Minus Building Drain Removal)
=(Direct Recharge + X% Water Received by Storm System) - (Y% x Water Removed by Building Drains)
Total Water Discharged to Aquifer Upper and Lower Zone
[Unit 1/2 Area [Unit 3 North Area [Unit 3 South
[Northern Clean Area Catchment + (30% Catchment + (60% Area + (10% [Southern Clean Zone Catchment + (0% [Unit 2 North + (50% Storm Storm Drain Water)]- Storm Drain Water)]- Storm Drain Area + (40% Storm Drain 1
Storm Drain Water)] Drain Water)]-[5gpm] [7.5 gpm] [7.5gpm] Water)] Water)] Units 87,857 52,641 248,077 342,144 323,955 754,373 ft^3/yr 241 144 680 937 888 2,067 ft^3/day 1.25 0.75 3.53 4.87 4.61 10.74 GPM 2,487,841 1,490,627 7,024,746 9,688,431 9,173,395 21,361,469 L/Yr 1
There are no improved surfaces in Northern Clean Zone.
Groundwater Discharged to Canal
=Water Recharged to Aquifer x X% flowing to Canal Upper and Lower Northern Clean Area Unit 1/2 Area Unit 3 North Area Unit 3 South Area Southern Clean Zone Catchment x 0% Unit 2 North x 15.2% Catchment 24.2% Catchment x 22.9% x68.4% Area x 0% Units 0 8,001 60,035 78,351 221,585 0 ft^3/yr Zone 0 22 164 215 607 0 ft^3/day 0.00 0.11 0.85 1.12 3.15 0.00 GPM 0 226,575 1,699,989 2,218,651 6,274,602 0 L/Yr Groundwater Discharged to River
=Water Recharged to Aquifer x X% flowing to River x Y% Flowing in Appropriate Vertical Zone Northern Clean Area Unit 1/2 Area Unit 3 North Area Catchment x 100% x Unit 2 North x 84.8% x Catchment x 75.8% x Catchment x 77.1% Unit 3 South Area Southern Clean Zone Upper Zone 59.3% 15.1% 11.7% x 47.9% x 31.6% x 31.3% Area x 100% x 55.2% Units 52,099 6,741 22,001 126,357 32,042 416,414 ft^3/yr 143 18 60 346 88 1,141 ft^3/day 0.74 0.10 0.31 1.80 0.46 5.93 GPM 1,475,290 190,872 622,997 3,578,025 907,322 11,791,531 L/Yr Northern Clean Area Unit 1/2 Area Unit 3 North Area Catchment x 100% x Unit 2 North x 84 84.8%
8% x Catchment 7575.8%
8% x Catchment x 7777.1%
1% Unit 3 South Area Southern Clean Zone Lower Zone e
40.7% 84.9% 88.3% x 52.1% x 31.6% x 68.7% Area x 100% x 44.8% Units 35,758 37,899 166,041 137,436 70,328 337,959 ft^3/yr 98 104 455 377 193 926 ft^3/day 0.51 0.54 2.36 1.96 1.00 4.81 GPM 1,012,551 1,073,180 4,701,761 3,891,756 1,991,471 9,569,938 L/Yr Water Remaining in Storm Drains and Discharged to Canal
=Storm Drain Water x X% Not Leaking to Groundwater and Not Discharging to River Southern Clean Zone Unit 2 North (45% Unit 2 Unit 3 South Area Area (30% Unit 1/2, 27%
North and 30% of Unit 1/2 Unit 3 North Area (3% Unit 3 North Unit 3 North, 43% Unit 3 Northern Clean Area Storm Drain Water). Plus 5 Unit 1/2 Area Catchment (3% Unit and 42% Unit 3 South, and 55% Southern Catchment (0% Storm gpm (351k cf/yr) from U2 Catchment (0% 3 North Storm Drain South Storm Clean Zone Storm Drain Drain Water) footing drain. Storm Drain Water) Water) Drain Water) Water) Units 0 976,054 0 30,119 458,559 1,495,576 ft^3/yr 0 2,674 0 83 1,256 4,097 ft^3/day 0 13.89 0.00 0.43 6.53 21.29 GPM 0 27,640,118 0 852,876 12,984,935 42,349,990 L/Yr Water Remaining in Storm Drains and Discharged to River Northern Clean Area Unit 1/2 Area Unit 3 North Area Unit 3 South Area Southern Clean Zone Catchment (0% Storm Unit 2 North (5% Storm Catchment (10% Catchment (7% (5% Storm Drain Area (5% Storm Drain Drain Water) Drain Water) Storm Drain Water) Storm Drain Water) Water) Water) Units 0 23,529 137,765 70,278 51,005 33,870 ft^3/yr 0 64 377 193 140 93 ft^3/day 0 0.33 1.96 1.00 0.73 0.48 GPM 0 666,266 3,901,058 1,990,044 1,444,293 959,092 L/Yr J:\17,000-18,999\17869\17869-92.MG\Q2-2010\Dose Calculations\
Appendix F - Q2 2010-dose calcs_FINAL.xlsx; Rainfall_model_H3 Page 2 of 3 Print Date: 1/21/2011
Facility Groundwater Flux Calculation Site Indian Point Prepared By: JAS Job No. 17869.92 Reviewed By: mjb Flux Calculations Conceptual Model: Migration Pathway Summary Northern Clean Area Unit 2 North Unit 1/2 Unit 3 North Unit 3 South Southern Clean Zone 31.6% Upper Zone 75.8% Upper Zone 77.1% Upper Zone 84.8% Upper Zone and and Lower Zone and Lower Zone To and Lower Zone To 100% Upper and Lower Zone Flow To River. To River. 68.4% 100% Upper and Lower GW River. 24.2% Upper River. 22.9% Upper Lower Zone To River 15.2% Upper Zone and Upper Zone and Zone To River Zone and Lower Zone and Lower Lower Zone Flow to Canal Lower Zone to Zone to Canal Zone to Canal Canal To Canal (Storm Water To Canal (85%
To Canal (60% Storm To Canal (33% Storm To Canal (55% Storm Considered Clean; Storm Water) and SW NA Water) and To River Water) and To River Water) and To River (5%
Estimated at 5.5 GPM) and To River (5%
(10% Storm Water) (7% Storm Water) Storm Water)
To River (5% Storm Water) Storm Water)
Flux (pCi/Yr)
North Clean Area Unit 2 North Unit 1/2 Unit 3 North Unit 3 South South Clean Zone Total GW to River-Upper 2.21E+08 4.88E+07 2.05E+09 1.15E+09 6.45E+08 2.17E+09 6.28E+09 Zone GW to River-1.52E+08 5.28E+08 4.55E+09 2.03E+09 1.07E+09 1.75E+09 1.01E+10 Lower Zone GW to Canal 0.00E+00 7.64E+07 6.95E+09 8.84E+08 4.46E+09 0.00E+00 1.24E+10 SW to Canal NA 5.06E+10 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 1.45E+10 1.60E+10 8.11E+10 SW to River NA 8.61E+07 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 1.93E+08 2.79E+08 Curies/Yr ==> 0.11 Notes:
The recharge rate used herein, 26% of precipitation (~10 in/yr), is within the range of values discussed in the USGS modeling report1. The reported recharge ranged from 3.6 inches/year to 7.5 inches/year for a till to 20 inches per year for coarse grained glacially stratified deposits. A yearly rolling average precipitation value measured at the Facility meteorological station is also used in the computations. The catchment area was defined using an AutoCAD topo map for the Site and surrounding area. The catchment was defined by starting at the area marked "line of water grant" and tracking east, away from the River, to define portions of the land surface contributing water to the selected discharge zone. Calculations assume that run-off or overland flow in unimproved areas of the Site is negligible, there are no changes in storage and the Hudson River is a gaining stream.
- 1. USGS. Water Use, Ground-Water Recharge and Availability, and Quality of Water in the Greenwich Area, Fairfield County, Connecticut and Westchester County, New York, 2000-2002 J:\17,000-18,999\17869\17869-92.MG\Q2-2010\Dose Calculations\
Appendix F - Q2 2010-dose calcs_FINAL.xlsx; Rainfall_model_H3 Page 3 of 3 Print Date: 1/21/2011
FINAL QUARTERLY LONG-TERM GROUNDWATER MONITORING REPORT Q2 2010 (REPORT NO. 10)
APPENDIX G: UNIT 2 TRITIUM PLUME TREND ANALYSES
TABLE G1 MANN-KENDALL TREND EVALUATION
SUMMARY
TRITIUM IN GROUNDWATER NEAR UNIT 2 INDIAN POINT ENERGY CENTER BUCHANAN, NY Number of Minimum Maximum Mann- Normalized Trend at 95%
Number of Times below Tritium Activity Tritium Activity Kendall Test Statistic Level of Well ID Data Points MDC (pCi/L) (pCi/L) Statistic (S) (Z) Probability Significance MW-30-69 36 0 7.36E+04 6.01E+05 -159 -2.15 0.984 decreasing MW-30-84 23 0 3.78E+03 1.25E+04 35 0.90 0.815 no trend MW-31-49 35 0 2.98E+02 4.84E+04 -3 -0.03 0.511 no trend MW-31-63 23 0 5.00E+03 7.35E+04 64 1.66 0.952 increasing MW-31-85 23 0 3.17E+02 2.25E+04 102 2.67 0.996 increasing MW-32-59 22 0 4.13E+02 1.55E+05 31 0.85 0.801 no trend MW-32-85 21 0 5.42E+03 1.26E+04 30 0.88 0.809 no trend MW-32-149 18 0 1.99E+02 1.05E+04 -25 -0.91 0.818 no trend MW-32-173 16 0 4.31E+02 5.89E+03 -38 -1.67 0.952 decreasing MW-32-190 20 0 1.59E+03 1.13E+04 -124 -3.99 1.000 decreasing MW-33 24 0 2.30E+04 2.64E+05 -121 -2.98 0.999 decreasing MW-35 20 0 1.04E+03 1.19E+05 -88 -2.82 0.998 decreasing MW-36-24 16 2 1.54E+02 3.42E+04 20 0.86 0.804 no trend MW-36-41 11 0 6.11E+03 5.52E+04 -32 -2.41 0.992 decreasing MW-36-52 16 0 5.97E+03 2.68E+04 -84 -3.74 1.000 decreasing MW-37-22 18 0 2.26E+03 3.49E+04 -43 -1.59 0.944 no trend MW-37-32 18 0 2.49E+03 3.01E+04 -55 -2.05 0.980 decreasing MW-37-40 17 0 4.22E+03 1.70E+04 -100 -4.08 1.000 decreasing MW-37-57 18 0 4.05E+03 4.48E+04 -93 -3.48 1.000 decreasing MW-42-49 18 0 1.12E+03 7.22E+04 -41 -1.52 0.935 no trend MW-42-78 13 0 3.46E+02 1.28E+03 -26 -1.53 0.936 no trend MW-49-26 20 0 2.82E+03 1.54E+04 -158 -5.09 1.000 decreasing MW-49-42 20 0 2.20E+03 1.13E+04 -148 -4.77 1.000 decreasing MW-49-65 20 0 1.26E+03 5.76E+03 -129 -4.15 1.000 decreasing MW-50-42 21 4 1.01E+02 9.75E+03 -42 -1.24 0.892 no trend MW-50-66 25 0 2.08E+03 1.08E+04 -202 -4.69 1.000 decreasing MW-53-82 15 0 4.54E+02 1.32E+04 -5 -0.20 0.578 no trend MW-53-120 18 0 4.10E+03 9.61E+03 -93 -3.48 1.000 decreasing MW-55-24 14 0 7.82E+02 3.08E+03 -14 -0.71 0.762 no trend MW-55-35 13 0 8.53E+02 9.04E+03 -28 -1.65 0.950 decreasing MW-55-54 14 0 5.47E+03 1.31E+04 -31 -1.64 0.950 no trend MW-111 33 0 6.81E+03 5.78E+05 -219 -3.38 1.000 decreasing DOWNGRADIENT WELLS MW-66-21 MW 66 21 13 0 8.28E+01 8.28E 01 3.57E+03 3.57E 03 -18 18 -1.04 1.04 0.850 no trend MW-66-36 12 0 3.05E+03 9.10E+03 -52 -3.50 1.000 decreasing MW-67-39 11 0 2.55E+03 5.07E+03 -35 -2.65 0.996 decreasing MW-67-105 12 0 1.54E+03 2.93E+03 -34 -2.26 0.988 decreasing MW-67-173 12 0 6.73E+02 1.05E+03 -29 -1.92 0.973 decreasing MW-67-219 11 0 9.22E+02 1.44E+03 -1 0.00 0.500 no trend MW-67-276 11 0 6.79E+02 1.18E+03 0 0.00 0.500 no trend MW-67-323 11 0 3.13E+02 1.29E+03 17 1.25 0.894 no trend MW-67-340 11 0 3.69E+02 6.69E+02 31 2.34 0.990 increasing Notes: Calculations based on Mann-Kendall trend evaluations as presented in U.S. EPA Practical Methods for Data Analysis, U.S. EPA QA/G-9 QA00 UPDATE, July 2000, Section 4.3.4 J:\17,000-18,999\17869\17869-92.MG\Q2-2010\Dose Calculations\Mann-Kendall\Q2 2010 Mann_Kendall_Tests_jas.xlsx; Mann-Kendall Summary Page 1 of 18 Print Date: 1/13/2011
MW-30 Tritium Activity (see logarithmic plot for trend in MW-30-84) 700,000 10
- 1. MW-30-69: Packer Test (70-75')
low flow Waterloo
- low flow samples collected open hole samples
- samples 560,000 1 8 420,000 6 280,000 4 Tritium Activity (pCi/L)
Inches of o Monthly Precipitation 140,000 2 0 0 Nov-05 May-06 Nov-06 May-07 Nov-07 May-08 Nov-08 May-09 Nov-09 May-10 Nov-10 MW-30-69 MW-30-84 Precipitation FIGURE G1
MW-30 Tritium Activity (logarithmic) 1,000,000 9 low flow 1. MW-30-69: Packer Test (70-75')
Waterloo samples *
- low flow samples collected open hole samples 1
100,000 6 Tritium Activity (pCi-L) 10,000 3 Inchees of Monthly Precipitation 1,000 0 Nov-05 May-06 Nov-06 May-07 Nov-07 May-08 Nov-08 May-09 Nov-09 May-10 Nov-10 MW-30-69 MW-30-84 Precipitation FIGURE G1a
MW-31 Tritium Activity 80,000 10
- 1. MW-31-49: Packer Test (43-52')
- low flow samples collected open hole low flow Waterloo Samples samples
- 64,000 8 48,000 6 32,000 4 Tritium Activity (pCi-L)
Inches of o Monthly Precipitation 16,000 2 1
0 0 Nov-05 May-06 Nov-06 May-07 Nov-07 May-08 Nov-08 May-09 Nov-09 May-10 Nov-10 MW-31-49 MW-31-63 MW-31-85 Precipitation FIGURE G2
MW-32 Tritium Activity 160,000 10
- 1. MW-32-131: Data below MDC.
Waterloo Samples Sample's activity results displayed.
- low flow sample collected open hole 128,000 8 96,000 6 low flow sample
- 64,000 4 Tritium Activity (pCi-L)
In nches of Monthly Precipitation 32,000 2 1
0 0 Nov-05 May-06 Nov-06 May-07 Nov-07 May-08 Nov-08 May-09 Nov-09 May-10 Nov-10 MW-32-59 MW-32-85 MW-32-131 MW-32-149 MW-32-173 MW-32-190 Precipitation FIGURE G3
MW-33 Tritium Activity 300,000 10 240,000 8 180,000 6 120,000 4 Tritium Activity (pCi/L)
In nches of Monthly Precipitation 60,000 2 0 0 Nov-05 May-06 Nov-06 May-07 Nov-07 May-08 Nov-08 May-09 Nov-09 May-10 Nov-10 MW-33 Precipitation FIGURE G4
MW-34 Tritium Activity 300,000 10 240,000 8 180,000 6 120,000 4 Tritium Activity (pCi/L)
In nches of Monthly Precipitation 60,000 2 0 0 Sep-05 Jan-06 May-06 Sep-06 Jan-07 May-07 Sep-07 MW-34 Precipitation FIGURE G5
MW-35 Tritium Activity 150,000 10 120,000 8 90,000 6 60,000 4 Tritium Activity (pCi/L)
In nches of Monthly Precipitation 30,000 2 0 0 Nov-05 May-06 Nov-06 May-07 Nov-07 May-08 Nov-08 May-09 Nov-09 May-10 Nov-10 MW-35 Precipitation FIGURE G6
MW-36 Tritium Activity 60,000 10
- 1. Data below MDC. Samples' activity results displayed.
48,000 8 36,000 6 24,000 4 Tritium Activity (pCi-L)
Inches of Monthly Precipitation 12,000 2 1
0 0 Nov-05 May-06 Nov-06 May-07 Nov-07 May-08 Nov-08 May-09 Nov-09 May-10 Nov-10 MW-36-24 MW-36-41 MW-36-52 Precipitation FIGURE G7
MW-37 Tritium Activity 50,000 10 40,000 8 30,000 6 20,000 4 Tritium Activity (pCi-L)
In nches of Monthly Precipitation 10,000 2 0 0 Nov-05 May-06 Nov-06 May-07 Nov-07 May-08 Nov-08 May-09 Nov-09 May-10 Nov-10 MW-37-22 MW-37-32 MW-37-40 MW-37-57 Precipitation FIGURE G8
MW-42 Tritium Activity 15,000 10 MW4249: Tritiumdataon
3/16/09equals72,200pCi/L 12,000 8 9,000 6 6,000 4 Tritium Activity (pCi-L)
IInches of Monthly Precipitation 3,000 2 0 0 Nov-05 May-06 Nov-06 May-07 Nov-07 May-08 Nov-08 May-09 Nov-09 May-10 Nov-10 MW-42-49 MW-42-78 Precipitation FIGURE G9
MW-49 Tritium Activity 20,000 10 16,000 8 12,000 6 8,000 4 Tritium Activity (pCi-L)
IInches of Monthly Precipitation 4,000 2 0 0 Nov-05 May-06 Nov-06 May-07 Nov-07 May-08 Nov-08 May-09 Nov-09 May-10 Nov-10 MW-49-26 MW-49-42 MW-49-65 Precipitation FIGURE G10
MW-50 Tritium Activity 15,000 10
- 1. Data below MDC. Samples' activity results displayed.
12,000 8 9,000 6 6,000 4 Tritium Activity (pCi-L)
In nches of Monthly Precipitation 3,000 2 1 1 1 1 0 0 Nov-05 May-06 Nov-06 May-07 Nov-07 May-08 Nov-08 May-09 Nov-09 May-10 Nov-10 MW-50-42 MW-50-66 Precipitation FIGURE G11
MW-53 Tritium Activity 15,000 10 12,000 8 9,000 6 6,000 4 Tritium Activity (pCi-L)
In nches of Monthly Precipitation 3,000 2 0 0 May-06 Nov-06 May-07 Nov-07 May-08 Nov-08 May-09 Nov-09 May-10 Nov-10 MW-53-82 MW-53-120 Precipitation FIGURE G12
MW-55 Tritium Activity 20,000 10 16,000 8 12,000 6 8,000 4 Tritium Activity (pCi-L) Inches of Monthly Precipitation 4,000 2 0 0 May-06 Nov-06 May-07 Nov-07 May-08 Nov-08 May-09 Nov-09 May-10 Nov-10 MW-55-24 MW-55-35 MW-55-54 Precipitation FIGURE G13
MW-111 Tritium Activity 800,000 15 640,000 12 480,000 9 Tritium Activity (pCi-L) 320,000 6 Inches of Monthly Precipitation 160,000 3 0 0 May-05 Nov-05 May-06 Nov-06 May-07 Nov-07 May-08 Nov-08 May-09 Nov-09 May-10 Nov-10 MW-111 Precipitation FIGURE G14
MW-66 Tritium Activity 15,000 10 1.Q1 2010analyticalresultsforMW6621andMW6636were
interchangedtocorrectasamplemisidentificationafterinspectingthe
datatrendsinbothsamplingports(bothhistoricandforQ22010).
12,000 8 9,000 6 Tritium Activity (pCi-L) 6,000 4 Inches I of Monthly Precipitation 1
3,000 2 1
0 0 May-07 Nov-07 May-08 Nov-08 May-09 Nov-09 May-10 Nov-10 MW-66-21 MW-66-36 Precipitation FIGURE G15
MW-67 Tritium Activity 6,000 10 4,800 8 3,600 6 2,400 4 Tritium Activity (pCi-L)
Inches of Monthly Precipitation 1,200 2 0 0 May-07 Nov-07 May-08 Nov-08 May-09 Nov-09 May-10 Nov-10 MW-67-39 MW-67-105 MW-67-173 MW-67-219 MW-67-276 MW-67-323 MW-67-340 Precipitation FIGURE G16
Changes in Total Estimated Tritium Plume Activity Over Time 0.15 0.149 86% overall reduction The bounding curve of total Unit 2 Tritium 0.05 0.16 activity as a function of time approximates a ExponentialDecayCurveFittingforEstimatedActivity first order decay approaching a positive, 0.14 UpperEstimate LowerEstimate horizontal asymptote. As such, the curve is 0.12 asymptotes=0.013 Ci(upper),0.008Ci(lower) consistent with that expected after r2 =0.9930(upper),0.9937(lower) elimination of all leaks from the Unit 2 SFP, 0.1 but with a small continuing release of Tritium 0.12 0.08 to the groundwater. The ongoing input to the Activity,Ci groundwater is attributed to the historically 0.06 0.04 leaked Tritium which is now being slowly released from storage (retention mechanism 0.04 0.0981 CSM). A relatively horizontal asymptote 0.02 would be expected to persist until the majority of this stored Tritium is purged from 0 the retention mechanism. Nov05 Nov06 Nov07 Nov08 Nov09 Nov10 Nov11 0.09 0.029 28% reduction since Q2 2007 0.03 0.025 0.023 0.022 0.021 0.06 0.019 0.019 0.018 0.018 0.02 0.017 0.016 0.016 0.017 0.015 0.016 0.014 Quarterly Total Tritium Activity (Ci) 0.013 0.012 Bounding* Total Tritium Plume Activity (Ci) 0.011 0.011 0.03 0.010 0.011 0.010 0.010 0.01 0.00 0.00 Bounding*
Bounding Q2 2007 Q3 2007 Q4 2007 Q1 2008 Q3 2008 Q4 2008 Q1 2009 Q2 2009 Q3 2009 Q4 2009 Q1 2010 Q2 2010 Upper Estimate of Total H3 Activity Lower Estimate of Total H3 Activity Note: Lower estimate
is based on a porosity of 0.0003 which was derived
from a pumping test conducted in 2006. Upper estimate is based on a porosity of 0.003 derived from a tracer test conducted in 2007. The Q2 2007 to Q1 2010 Tritium plume activity estimates are each based on Tritium levels measured in the groundwater monitoring installations at individual, quarterly snapshots in time.
- The bounding activity estimate, however, encompasses a longer period of time, and is focused on the Tritium levels existing during the earliest portions of the groundwater investigation. During this period of time, before termination of all the identified SFP leaks, Tritium concentrations were at their highest levels, but the network of monitoring installations was still being installed. Therefore, measurements made at a multiple times were required to capture early data covering the full extent of the Tritium plume; primarily over the period from Nov 20005 through Nov 2006 (a smaller percentage of the Tritium levels required inclusion of measurements through Sept 07). For the bounding Tritium plume activity estimate, the highest value recorded for each monitoring location during this time period was used in the analysis. For further discussion see Sections 6.0, 7.0 and 8.0 of the Final Hydrogeologic Site Investigation Report, prepared by GZA and dated January 7, 2008.
Figure G-17
FINAL QUARTERLY LONG-TERM GROUNDWATER MONITORING REPORT Q2 2010 (REPORT NO. 10)
APPENDIX H: SOUTHERN BOUNDARY WELLS
TEMPORAL TRITIUM TRENDS IN SOUTHERN BOUNDARY WELLS 325 5 MW40MW-40-27 MW-40-46 MW-40-81 MW-40-100 MW-40-127 MW-40-162 Rainfall 250 4 Daily Precipitation ipitation (in)
Tritium Activity vity (pCi/L) 175 3 100 2 25 1
-50 0 Jan-07 Apr-07 Jul-07 Oct-07 Jan-08 Apr-08 Jul-08 Oct-08 Jan-09 Apr-09 Jul-09 Oct-09 Jan-10 Apr-10 Jul-10 325 MW51 5 MW-51-40 MW-51-79 MW-51-104 MW-51-135 MW-51-163 MW-51-189 Rainfall 250 4 m Activity (pCi/L)
Tritium Daily Precipitation (in) 175 3 100 2 Hi 25 1
-50 0 Jan-07 Apr-07 Jul-07 Oct-07 Jan-08 Apr-08 Jul-08 Oct-08 Jan-09 Apr-09 Jul-09 Oct-09 Jan-10 Apr-10 Jul-10 FIGURE H1