ML12094A117

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Entergy Pre-Filed Evidentiary Hearing Exhibit ENT00334E - GZA Final Quarterly Long-Term Ground Water Monitoring Report. Appendix E: Post - Q2 2010 Sampling Data Sheets
ML12094A117
Person / Time
Site: Indian Point  Entergy icon.png
Issue date: 06/30/2010
From:
GZA GeoEnvironmental
To:
Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Panel
SECY EHD
Shared Package
ML1289A594 List:
References
RAS 22131, 50-247-LR, 50-286-LR, ASLBP 07-858-03-LR-BD01
Download: ML12094A117 (47)
v • d • e


Text

FINAL QUARTERLY LONG-TERM GROUNDWATER MONITORING REPORT Q2 2010 (REPORT NO. 10)

APPENDIX E: POST-Q2 2010 MID-QUARTER SAMPLING DATA SHEETS ENT00334E Submitted: March 29, 2012

CLIENT:

Entergy - [PEC GZA GeoEnvironmental of New York Modified Traditional Purge Sampling Data Sheet PROJECT NO:

SITE:

Buchanan. NY \\

I t

WEATHER: S U VI *f ('.- o.J d S '7 Q oS DATE:

SAMPLER(S):

WATER COLUMN HEIGHT (et) 07.00.

4 Well Diameter:

'7.

0

..:....:..---!... ___ ft DTB Water Column Height Diameter GALLONS OF WATER PER WELL VOLUME:

Water Column Height 7. '-i 0 1,20 1.5 o.\\~=3 Multiplier

=

_..:..\\ _' :;:2:...;:O=--__ gal Well Volume

..l...\\.:.....:..~~( __

gal 1

2 4

WELL ID:MuJ-44-bl>

SAMPLE ID: 0\\ f, 01.0017869.92 b (\\Q M. 'PH +/-o~

____ in Multfplien 0.041 0.163 0.653 Designed Purge Volume TOTAL VOLUME PURGED:

I. 55' gal WATER QUALITY:

DTW=

Transducer Actual Depth Time Equipment Used YSI 556 MPS Reader and 5563 Sonde turbidity meter NOTES AND OBSERVATIONS:

Depth and Depth to Water (DTW) measurements are given in feet from top of casing.

Groundwater Elevation measurements are given in feet ms!.

(SU)

ORP 0.5" Turbidity (NTU)

Drive Pressure Notes Equipment Identification #

5'

'200r042.q~

GZA GeoEnvironmental of New York WELLID: h1w -44J02 SAMPLE ID: 0 ']

Modified Traditional Purge Sampling Data Sheet CLIENT:

Entergy - IPEC PROJECT NO:

SITE:

Buchanan, NY WEATHER: 5\\)\\1 -+ c...-\\QUd s 70 s DATE:

SAMPLER(S):

01.0017869.92 01 I~

M. rA2t~

WATER COLUMN HEIGHT (ft)

\\02.00 -

DTH Well Diameter:

34.00 ft h\\'* OQ

=

--"'----'--'-=-=----

DTW Water Column Height Diameter Multipliers I

0.041 GALLONS OF WATER PER WELL VOLUME:

2 0.163 Water Column Height 3 ~. 0 0 x

0,04,

_(_. =.,3_9_4<---_gal 4

0.653 Multiplier Well Volume x

1.5

_-=2:......:.~o~'1~ ___ gal Designed Purge Volume TOTAL VOLUME PURGED: 2. 2 5 WATER QUALITY:

DTW=

Transducer Actual Depth Volume DTWor Temp Specific Dissolved Turbidity Time Purged Actual Depth (DC)

Conductivity Oxygen pH (SU)

ORP (NTU)

Notes (gal)

(Stcm) 19/J)

\\242 0

pv tv\\ r Of0

\\245 0.05

\\~.'"3 o,rCie.. '1.07 t,29,s 4 ~O\\. b

\\ 2 4~ 0.40 -

\\7.3!jS> o.ct'R4 7.5-' 7.32 1'f;7. 2 71 \\. 3

\\252 (').bO -

\\7.39 '.\\01 7.310 7.32 I~O.2 Iq2b:7

,2'5 b 1.0

\\7. 3~ i.OS~ ~.~4 7.'32 1'l4. \\ c;2b.(

,300 ). 4 1\\7.42 1.053 ~,sR '7. '3'3 '15. ~ ~ \\ $?2

'1304

\\. s.?

\\7.~4 LOS-\\? c-" ~5 7*34 <1b.2 '1~4_b

\\30"] 2. \\

\\7.1~ \\.055 ".,1 7.35 9b ~ ~gq.9 l :lUI 1 PuM P

~~

1301?

sme. T 5AMr Lf Co Il.L Ec T1 ON

\\3\\3 SAf...fr Lf COfV rLfID~,

2 L :r 1Pe:c..

~

0.5 L :l: IPEG 1313 f'll M f O~c:

Equipment Used Equipment Identification #

YSI 556 MPS Reader and 5563 Sonde 4

in gal turbidHy meter 2oo1o~2~3 NOTES AND OBSERVATIONS:

Depth and Depth to Water (DTW) measurements are given in feet from top of casing.

Groundwater Elevation measurements are given in feet ms!.

GZA GeoEnvironmental of New York Waterloo Sampling Data ~he~t CLIENT:

Enlergy - IPEC PROJECT NO:

SITE:

WEATHER:

Bu7hanan. NY

(\\

I c"t> J el¥, S\\1.qw u S ( 10 $

DATE:

SAMPLER(S):

SAMPLING INTERVAL (depth in n below top of caslnl>

TOTAL VOLUME PURGED:

\\20,3 10 WELL ID: MW 32 - \\ ~O SAMPLE ID: D 20 0,),5 gal PURGE RATE: ~

(gall min)

SAMPLING PORT

\\go l

PURGE METHOD:

Double Valve Pump WATER QUALITY:

Purged Volume

-ipccltJC Dissolved Turbidity DriveiVent Drive Pressure Time Temp

('lC)

Conductivity pH (SU)

ORP (gal)

IS/em)

Oltygen (gil)

(NTIJ)

Cycle (sr:onds)

(psi)

\\ U ;~'C 0

PUMe nl'oJ "i?/<6 49

\\\\ no O. \\

t q 19.

I. b,9 \\.44 b.'"\\3.- 2 \\ 61 I

I' lO n. 2.

10.. I ~

I. '""~ q j*on c.. 99 -21'1.2 9.'2.7

, I \\ C\\

0.25 \\'1.ct-. \\*(,9, o.~b 7.04 -2.\\t?S

~A3 1120 o 30 I ~.q '1 l *'102 ".14-t 0 S- - 2 O~.-,

~...,~

I \\ ~o 0 *35 1'1.01

\\. '105 O.S b l. oS?

.. - '-i?~. 2 9.90

\\\\?,C)

O

. 4~

\\st.tO~ I. fn h o

4iS' "7 09

\\80.9

~. C1 S?

JLL\\ 2 o. 4s"

\\ q.04

\\.'10'" o LIZ

7. I'

- (9 b.~

~..,

11 C)o D

~ 50 \\0. 0 r

\\. 10<1 o

~2,. \\:3 - 20,.-,

~

.'X~

12.00 O.c::.,O

\\~,Q9 l. '7nio 0.30

'7. 14 -1'1'1.0 Q.94 1'20 S-O.*f (')

\\ <2.9"1

\\. '7n t.,

0

. ~O _1-l~{'

- \\9Ll.9

~_~1

.... 11 It

\\ 2. 0 ~

P U f.Jlf o~l=

17n i?

_~t2."T

~t4Pl t=

Go Ll IFe. 'r1 0" J I

\\

\\2 ~3

~()I LoM W=> L t:= TFl) 2 L

"If II£. {M, Id 0 v o-v' ~ ~

\\ 2 L\\~

PLlMf'

~&=

\\.

~

Equipment Used Equipment Identification II YSI 556 MPS Reader and 5563 Sonde 4-turbidity meter Z.OnIO L, 2 ~ ~

GZA GeoEnvironmental of New York Waterloo Sampling Data She~t CLIENT:

Entergy - IPEe PROJECT NO:

SITE:

WEATHER:

Buchanan. NY t

(

C IQ s>d{, Shov..JCf> I 70 5.

DATE:

SAMPLER(S):

SAMPLING INTERVAL (depth In n below top or casing)

TOTAL VOLUME PURGED:

\\'2S!~

to

\\74.3 WELL ID: MW ~

-113 SAMPLE ID:

0' "

01.0017869.92 /

6/9 10 D.70 gal PURGE RATE:

variable (gall min)

SAMPLING PORT

\\13 2

PURGE METHOD:

Double Valve Pump WATER QUALITY:

Purged Volume Specific Dissolved Turbidity DrivelVent Drive Pressure Time Temp (0C)

Conductivity pH (SU)

ORP (gal)

(Slcm)

Oxygen (g/I)

(NTU)

Cycle (seconds)

(psi)

,\\05U 0

PUMf o f'-l of? I S?

4g

'\\ on 0,1

\\ '1.2-""

1.9,9 1.55 7.40 -'21.~

\\110 Q.2 1'1.2S, 9 =39 o.,~

7.25 - \\24*,

I\\IS-0.25 "LIG:,,. '131

~o._h2.

/.21 -'2S.3 9.Q7

\\ '2.0

{).30 Ict. \\g \\.cr 3 2 0,5'0 7. It..

-12'1?b

~"93

, \\ :\\ 0 0.3S I

Q,. 20 \\. '1 4 I 0.3(,

'7. IS - \\ 30. 9

~.<?~

_11 3 c:;-

o.it 0 19.22,.94ro 0.32..

7.14 - \\ ~2.0 i?_ *~7 1142 O. LlS'

\\ '1. I '1

\\ ~ f,3 0.30

-, \\3.- \\ ~2.2

~.99

\\ \\ So 0.55

\\ q. t S' 1.9, l.. I) 2~

7. 12-

- \\ 3 0*4

~.94

.. I

\\, 52 PLlMf o+:{:

\\ \\ S5

.5:r"na. i SAUP!

I ~ Colt ~\\1n. fJ i 223 S.t\\f.H'LE CoMt' Lf: ITt) 2 L ':l:1" ~C ( fv1 \\ 11 OV04-l ~.r

\\22~

PUMP

_Qff-

./

Equipment Used Equipment Identification 1#

YSJ 556 MPS Reader and 5563 Sonde 5'_

turbidity meter 2nnlo4?93 NOTES AND OBSERVATIONS: f'I1r d Q v (Y( i f?- (

50) V\\A e Ie.

GZA GeoEnvironmental of New York Waterloo Sampling Data ~he~t CLIENT:

Entergy - !PEC PROJECT NO:

SITE:

WEATHER:

Buchanan. NY

~

\\

CJovdy \\ S OWtA"S I Jo.>

DATE:

SAMPLER(S):

SAMPLING INTERVAL (depth in n below top of culnl>

TOT AL VOLUME PURGED:

\\47. 3 to WELLID: MW 32 -\\49 SAMPLE ID:

<0 \\ Q 01.0017869.92 c:;l 4 ',0 0. 75 gal PURGE RATE: ~

(gall min)

SAMPLING PORT 149 3

PURGE METHOD:

Double Valve Pump WATER QUALITY:

Time Purged Volume (gal)

Specific Dissolved Temp 1°C)

Conductivity pH (SU)

(S/em)

Oxygen (gil)

ORP Turbidity (NTU)

DrivelVenl Drive Pressure Cycle (seconds)

(psi)

\\0 S'b 49

\\ \\ 00 I~. \\~

I.S\\u.

2.02 J

,,' C o oS 1'1. I ~

I 50~

i.02

<D. \\

,9 0 \\

I. 5 \\ D o~ ~ 9

\\ \\ 20

_0 I S" c..

<j?c\\

I 5 h.I

q. 2 0

,, ~ 0 0. 20

\\ '1. \\ \\

I. S 5 ?

n. -~ 5

\\ I

.~ S" 0.25

\\ \\ Y 2 o 3_0 1C\\. i3 \\.'570050 7. 0

- \\ S 4. f-

'i1 '7 l.

\\ \\ ~D o 3~

\\ q.o~ I. ~ Q 3

(), 4 I 1200 o

~O

\\ 20 c;-

D. S-D

,g.o)?

\\. S~~ 0 2..

'~

I C\\. \\ \\

\\. SG t, O

~ 2-O.Go

\\ '1. I 2 l. 51 b. (J 3'

, 2\\~

121,

\\ 2 '")2 Equipment Used Equipment Identification t YSI 556 MPS Reader and 5563 Sonde 2

turbidity meter 20n -'0_42 Cf5

~OTES AND OBSERVATIONS:

1 I (J Q

-+ r S

(

I'"

va.. ( \\e

~p e.

WELLID: MW~-~

SAMPLE ID:

02,

GZA GeoEnvironmental of New York Waterloo Sampling Data ~heet CLIENT:

Entergy. !PEC PROJECT NO:

SITE:

WEATHER:

Buchanan. NY

~

I Cia"" eli, s ouler $

705=

DATE:

SAMPLER(S):

SAMPLING INTERVAL (depth in n below top or caslua)

TOTAL VOLUME PURGED:

79.3 to

92. if 1.35 gal PURGE RATE: ~

(gall min)

SAMPLING PORT PURGE METHOD:

Double Valve Pump WATER QUALITY:

Purged Volume SpecifiC Dissolved Turbidity Drive/Vent Drive Pressure Time Temp (0e)

Conductivity pH (SU)

ORP (gal)

(S/em)

Oxygen (gil)

(NTU)

Cycle (seconds)

(psi)

\\ 0 t;-o 0

P U f-A P O~

~ I~

4C\\

\\ \\OC) 0,25 \\9.07

\\.fo47 LI. 13

7. \\ 7

-24,, 4 -

I

'_LID n.4~

t R '1l.4.

\\. b qll 3_.l4 7.1~ _ ~C:;.L.

\\ \\\\ S" 0.5 S-

\\Q.9\\'

\\. 64 \\

2. St'\\

7,2.\\

- -474.-. S 7 -c,li.

I) 20 0

'10

\\9 00 \\. C-.4Lt 2.zC" 7 21 - 4~. I f.<==11 U 30 0. 9 S Iq.oO \\. ~4~

\\.Q'2 7.2\\ _ 4~. o.;?

'7. ~Cf 1\\:3 5 0 S'

\\~ '9'?

l.b4~ I.g, 7.22 _ lJ.C;.'

7. -~i

\\\\ L~ Z 1.20

\\~. q7 \\. 6s1 I. <=1 ~

7. 22. -4S-.C> 7. 'i< 4

.. If

.f' II ~~

PUMP

~r-lll(S" s;rn (l. r SAMi'l E CoLl EC... 'nDN

\\

1'2.0"3 C:;AM f' L E CoM ~LET8).

2-L ::rPF(

( MIl')

QuAtT1 ~

}

\\ 203-PUMP

~F Equipment Used Equipment Identification II YSI 556 :viPS Reader and 5563 Sonde 3

turbidity meter

-crno 70429 3

~

~OTES AND OBSERVATIONS:

WELL ID: MW 32 -59 SAMPLE ID: -----,-0",--,-' -==--__

GZA GeoEnvironmental of New York Waterloo Sampling Data ~het:t CLlENT:

Enlergy - !PEC PROJECT NO:

SITE:

WEATHER:

Buchanan. N~

\\

C\\oudi" I $>tQv..)~S,Jo's DATE:

SAMPLER(S):

SAMPLING INTERVAL (deptb in n below top or culDa)

TOTAL VOLUME PURGED:

2.~. 3 (0

6\\.3 l.0 gal PURGE RATE:

variable (gall min)

SAMPLING PORT 59 WATER QUALITY:

Time

( U{)~

\\43, J4s'3 Purged Volume (gal) o

.fj,0 f t>. \\

(",. ~

o 5 0.65 PURGE METHOD:

SpecifiC Dissolved Temp (oC)

Conductivity pH (SU)

(stem)

O"ygen (gil)

ORP

\\ '1. () \\

, -. 0 ~

~ c...c....n "1. '2[...

'j.2G

'-..u7 l.~o I~_IQ O.~.-=3'

/.33 b S" 3

\\Q.2..l O

. ~'2c.

\\'1.20 O.~22 c; 59 Equipment Used YSI 556 W>>S Realfer and 5563 Sontle turbidity meter

~OTES AND OBSERVATIONS:

Double Valve Pump Turbidity (NTU)

Drive/Vent Drive Pressure Cycle (seconds)

(psi)

)( I J 25 2t

\\..., c..

I.C-..Q

\\.bi

\\

Equipment Identillcation II C;

2no, 04 2q 3

GZA GeoEnvironmental of New York Waterloo Sampling Data ~he~t CLIENT:

Entergy - IPEC PROJECT NO:

SITE:

WEATHER:

Buchanan. NY S \\} hV1 <( 7 0 S" DATE:

SAMPLER(S):

SAMPLING INTERVAL (depth iD It below top or culq)

TOTAL VOLUME PURGED:

77.3 to

~5.4 WELL ID: MW 3!L -~

SAMPLE ID: 0 '2 3

_i..... o,-O ___ gal PURGE RATE: ~

(gal / min)

SAMPLING PORT PURGE METHOD:

Double Valve Pump WATER QUALITY:

Purged Volume Specitlc Dissolved Turbidity DrivcJVent Drive Pressure Time (gal)

Temp lOC)

Conductivity Oxygen (gil) pH lSU)

ORP lNTU)

Cycle ~seconds)

(psi)

(S/em)

\\tOD

~

/ ;

.30'~41

~\\\\O

(()*O\\

2(..,.52-

~.'1 3 )

4,20 c..,,9 I 3~,4 G I' Cf 4~

'\\ 2-0

~ co'S

2. Co.2b \\,',22-2.95 t-.. 9 ~

~ 4.0 -

P I//~

I

'l ~D

.~ 5"

26. -.:::.2-I. t-,_'1_4-

~,5l\\-

7 '~'1 2/.7 -

~'h2 I

I) LtQ o_t.,C;

2. 1,..,

t'-.O 1,7o~ q,'13 7,'73 4~,4 -

'I 11-

\\ \\ 4-~

o~-,'5 21.. 58 \\ ' -7tO 7

~L9b

'7. 79 50,2... -

\\

.~ 3 I \\ SO Q. -'8_5 2.(., s4 \\,'lob

-(2

~ '1

'7, S \\

5/, I 4-33

\\. \\ 5 \\

PUM f' oFF

\\ \\ 53 S 17\\fl 'T SAM PLE Co lLECTl O,.,J I

\\'2.\\9

~AM IPLE:

C<: )A-1 P L E 1 E T)

~

2-L

JdJz=
.c.

rvll _~ (3 U OA,J" Tell:"

l'2..'~

p U fV1 r DFF Equipment Used Equipment Identification 1#

YSI 556 MPS Reader and 5563 Sonde

~

turbidity meter

~OTES AND OBSERVATIONS:

GZA GeoEnvironmental of New York Waterloo Sampling Data ~he~t CLIENT:

Entergy - IPEC PROJECT NO:

SITE:

WEATHER:

Buchanan, NY

\\

5unVli (0 >

DATE:

SAMPLER(S):

SAMPLING INTERVAL (depth In n below top or caslq)

TOTAL VOLUME PURGED:

01.3 to

71. 3 WELLID: Mw~-69 SAMPLE ID: 03 '2

_:...,;1.:,...;0:::::* :......-_gal PURGE RATE: ~

(gall min)

SAMPLING PORT PURGE METHOD:

Double Valve Pump WATER QUALITY:

Purged Volume Specific Dissolved Turbidity DrivelVent Drive Pressure Time Temp (GC)

Conductivity pH (SU)

ORP (gal)

(S/cm)

Oxygen (gil)

(NTU)

Cycle (seconds)

(psi)

}lOO 0

ruM r,:>

010

~ 1 ao~ 4\\

\\- \\ /\\ 0 0,0 \\

2. Go. -'J /J, 0.931..\\

'S?22.

$(,2.c 23.52

~.E?

41

~, 21) f)

  • t 2.h.('s" 3~O C1 1:5 2 to,Sl

\\ " '~'R \\

{. L\\. C.

~ 'Z.G::t 4q I

\\?

'\\ \\ 40 Q, G~

2.t-. ~ \\. ~gq

~.i.i.L Q ~)-

SCi '~

or

\\ \\ 4 s o.;s 2 c::,.45' I. '3'R \\

q' \\ 41

~,"?l\\

-~D,~-

33 I \\ a::;;-o o R5 2...6.43

\\ * :3 b'q 9*47

'.3D C:, ) 2-

... If 33 I I C; I PuJ h(>

~t='r-:

i \\ 5?'

s..n ~ e. T

,j...., ~{v' e Lf Co L Lt::< ~ ilION

\\ '2-32 SA M P1.. t

OM'Pl E:TCtJ L

L

rp ~L /VII ;:(

WUQN' 'leA'

\\"2- '32 PU 1M t' <oF F Equipment Used Equipment Identification II YSI 556 MPS Reader and 5563 Sonde

~

turbidity meter SOTES AND OBSERVATIONS:

CLIENT:

SITE:

WEATHER:

Enlergy - IPEC Buchanan. NY SJY7,()'i

]0 So GZA GeoEnvironmental of New York Waterloo Sampling Data ~he~t PROJECT NO:

DATE:

SAMPLER(S):

SAMPLING INTERVAL (depth in ft below top or casing)

TOT At VOLUME PURGED:

5S,~

to 63.~

WELL ill: MW -..aL -~

SAMPLE ID: ---"-0_2_4<---_

OI.OO17869,~ I G J '7

) 0

"'lB I

1.'30 gal PURGE RA TE: ~

(gal / min)

SAMPLING PORT PURGE METHOD:

Double Valve Pump 63 WATER QUALITY:

Purged Volume Specific Dissolved Turbidity Drive/Venl Drive Pressure Time Temp (Ile)

Conductivity pH (SU)

ORP (gal)

(Slcm)

Ol{ygen (gil)

(NTU)

Cycle (]ecomls)

(psi)

~O '30

("")

.poM Ie o~

c;,

7 2~

jolt 0 O,oS

,g,T?

I.S2S S' l12 7*Li S

. ~ -

-, I iO

.31.0 l o.c:;n 0*15 70*29, ~\\ ~

4. ~(") ',.\\ 4-

+ '~"I

\\ \\ DO O.~O \\ Cf. ~ 5

\\.520 2. ~Cf

/. I 2-j 'L 2-

~.Ik, 1105 0.40 20.2'7 \\.S20 2.00

'1 II 2b. I l._"il~

\\ \\ I ~

{)

  • 5S 2n.\\9 l

. S~~ 2, 0 b I. to

?,:>, ~

5.45" i \\ 22 O, r5 20.2b

\\.5bo 2. \\ \\,. \\ \\

40. '>?

.S,32-II

\\ \\

~l~ O-G S'

20. (,,0 I.S~O :2. \\ 0

(. \\ t

'-l2. S 5:~S

'1 LQ

~2

\\' 3 ~ \\.05 20.be.,

,, S'1l.\\

2.\\1 7

1\\

L4 3 I S.2Q

'\\

I

_L\\ f\\ '-I I

I I S' 20.5'1 I,bO~ 2,'-0

'1. \\ I 4Q,4 5.27

¥

) \\ it t; PLl tv1 f' O+:~

\\\\4c.,

S lL\\(2.. T

'AlJlf LE Col l~C. Tl 0 \\l

\\ 2. \\9

.s AM Pl E CoMI ~l ~ T£t)

~

2 L

tfE<

M,d Q0OX"n:,(,

\\2\\'1 PUMP Qlf'r

~

Equipment Used Equipment Identification #I YSI 556 MPS Reader and 5563 Sonde 5

turbidity meIer 20CY104293

~OTES AND OBSERVATIONS:

,.,.1, d QlJCA[ t e( 5a. V\\I\\ f \\ e

CLIENT:

SITE:

WEATHER:

Entergy - IPEC Buchanan. NY Sv VI '0 i GZA GeoEnvironmental of New York Waterloo Sampling Data Shet:t PROJECT NO:

\\

70 >

DATE:

SAMPLER(S):

SAMPLING INTERVAL (depth ia n below top or culu.>

TOTAL VOLUME PURGED:

34.~

to 49_~

WELL ID: MW ~

-A..j SAMPLE ID: 024 2.\\0 gal PURGE RATE: ~

(gall min)

SAMPLING PORT 49 PURGE METHOD:

Double Valve Pump WATER QUALITY:

Purged Volume Specific Dissolved Turbidity DriveiVent Drive Pressure Time Temp (DC)

Conductivity pH (SU)

ORP (gal)

(S/em)

Oxygen (gil)

(NTU)

Cycle lseconds)

(psi) 103.0 0

f'uMf O~t...J

~...,

2 'R 1D l.~O 0:,2..0 \\S<.h9 1*~Qf) 3

\\7 7.02

-~

C)

"7'1 I 0 3 0

\\ C ~O 0.70

\\ f< q h

\\, ~OO

~ 02

/.0,"':>

+'~ *

. O i' 00 l.iO Ii\\'.41

\\.519

~.30 7.01-.

t::l4 '7 ct?90

\\ ~ 05

\\ *45 I <K.qu.-

I S49

  • ~.*~3
7. 0 c:;

C;,.~

Q.p;f

\\ I { :3 1* '15

\\ Q. '1 \\

I..::; 7 L\\.

.=1. ~ 4 7 04.

Sf. \\

g.~ C-,

,,If

..... ~

I I \\ 5

(/\\JIV\\ ID Dr-~

\\ \\ \\ I STI!\\' "\\

SAt-, A PLf. rd b LL~('_'Tl ( ~r0 i \\ 3 (')

SL\\M( 'L E CD M P L E 'T"'1: In

~

2.

L rl1l£c.

Jv1\\ d Gh )C&A "Tee t \\ 30 Pl'Mr

<5 'f'~

Equipment Used Equipment Identification' YSI 556.\\1PS Reader and 5563 Sonde 4-turbidit,y meter 2 001042_'13

~OTES AND OBSERVATIONS:

M \\ ~ Guo,...( 1-e ( S ~

pie...

CLIENT:

SITE:

WEATHER:

Entergy - !PEC Buchanan, NY 5l,)(\\ V)..... (

I

'] 0 s GZA GeoEnvironmental of New York Waterloo Sampling Data ~he~t PROJECT NO:

DATE:

SAMPLER(S):

SAMPLING INTERVAL (depth In n below top or culna)

TOTAL VOLUME PURGED:

10 j5,4-WELL ID: MW.aL -~

SAMPLE lD:

Q24 01.001 7869.92/

Ibl:r lo 1.40 gal PURGE RATE: ~

(gal/ min)

SAMPLING PORT PURGE METHOD:

WATER QUALITY:

Time Purged VolumeS-pecffic Dissolved (gal)

Temp (oC)

Conductivity (S/cm)

Ollygen (gil) pH (SU)

ORP

, b So 0 _ \\ n i £1, q n 2 n R~ :=3. 4 \\

I, a"l - -, l.... '4 Double Valve Pump Turbidity (NTU)

DrivelVent Drive Pressure Cycle ~econds)

(psi)

.~17

?~

I I 0

.~ ("'I

\\

, \\ 00 0.2..0 1'1.?'2 2, I DO 3, '19

'7,05<

'.,~C\\, 2

g. '1Cf

\\ \\ 0 5"

("). '3 5

\\ Cl (,..., \\

'7., n g l...

~ _~l

{O ~ -

\\ 7, '7 Q, ~ 9 Equipment Used Equipment Identification l#

YSI 556,\\liPS Read~ Jnd 5563 Sonde 2-turbidity met~

2.00-1042 '13

'IIOTES AND OBSERV,.\\ TIONS:

N\\ \\ J Q lJa.v' t e..( ~

r \\ e.

GZA GeoEnvironmental of New York Low-Flow Sampling Data Sheet WELL ID: N\\ tAl... 3~

SAMPLE -\\t: 0,2 0 CLIENT:

Entergy - IPEC SITE:

Buchanan. NY 1

WEATHER: M ~ frJV)V)j 70 S PROJECT NO:

DATE:

01.0017869.92 5/ 20 110 SAMPLER(S):

PUMP DEPTH:

WATER QUALITY:

DTW= 7 :T1 Transducer Actual Depth ::::. l7." ~

f~.~<i';: \\OSS\\

DTW..oc Temp S~c i tlc Dissolved EL.a, A Time Conductivity Oxygen pH ORP Turbidity Flow Rate r Nott~' 0

.QCtUal Depth ~

~oC)

(Slcm)

(WI)

(SU)

(NTU)

(gaVhr)

H20. ~

\\ CD, \\

\\1. l"Q

~o'l

\\(~~ 4 f"UM If O IV

,e 2-7

\\ 7.(;,00 \\c...04 D. ~~3 4.4 3 "7.0 S'... '53*7 -

1. 0 I r; 31

\\7.S~o \\ b.<5\\ O

  • bl(

,.95 / *09 *-107. 10 " 43 La 4'1

, 7. 5\\'0 t7. 0~ D. 615

\\

. ~Q 7. 12. -13...., I i. ~'

O. Z-10 '54 (7. 5~2 17*37 0.674 \\.63 _7 * \\, -16.4 9. 52

'n 03 11.59 \\ \\1 "&0 0.672 \\. 5"2 I. f 3.. ((,.7 to.52

",3

\\ 7. 5'}" J~. 21 0.671,*Ltk _7. L3.-g~

., Q IO. lc2 II'~

11.S~',\\?A2. O. ~7' (.43 ",. \\ 3 ~ ~5. 9 If'") 0 "1 tI'2..?>

\\ 7J.,9S il? *5\\ {). Io -(o, _'+0 1. i L+ -1(7. i 10.02

' \\ '2 ~

\\1<~'1'S" \\

~,5" 0. b10

\\.~

I 7.1~,- <i7.~ \\0.\\0 0.5 Ii.30

~(2.'

sA vlf'l£ C O LLE< i-notJ

\\3 2. 5 SA~

.. *tf E ~

'-MpU~ l ~

\\

2 L. If £.6:

0.'5 L If EC.

l ~2 5" Pv tv\\ {> OI=F Equipment Used Equipment Identification #

YSI 556 MPS Reader and 5563 Sonde 3

now meter tf..

turhidity_ meter 2 00'7 0 4 2 9:5

~OTES AND OBSERVATIONS:

Total volume purged 0.0 5 gal Depth and Depth to Water (DTW) measurements are given in feet from top of casing.

Groundwater Elevation measurements are given in feet msl.

GZA GeoEnvironmental of New York Low-Flow Sampling Data Sheet WELL lD: LA E -OOl SAMPLE lD: 0 \\ '3 CLIENT:

Entergy* IPEC SITE:

Bu!:hanan. NY

\\

J

\\

WEATHER: Sy 11 -\\- (' 0 J S

Go 5 PROJECT NO:

DATE:

SAMPLER(S):

01.0017869.92

....J \\ ~ I \\ 0 PUMP DEPTH:

_______ ft WATER QUALITY:

DTW= 74.25 Transducer Actual Depth CnT9 r Temp Specific Dissolved pH Turbidity DriveNent Drive

~~

Time Conductivity Oxygen ORP Cycle Pressure Actual Depth (oC)

(S/em) 1I!!1l (SU)

(NTU)

(seaonds)

(psi) t-L,o '~u

\\0"33

  • 7 4.2S Pu ~ p

~tV h 12 \\

,SO 0

\\0 _50 7 Lf.25 17.,0

~L94 \\Q\\.2 00\\

, \\ 00 '1Y. 21 \\1.\\'7 2 40\\ 9 :,,

~

.c5~ 174. 2

\\ \\0'1 7~

. 30 \\C) 6\\ 2 CoIC:

~

. lO c:.. S-0 \\ '\\2 \\ 9.<?7 i 1, '7 114.-32

\\~

.7q 2.bO(' S? 3 7 t.. L... 7 '$?"'-, 1\\0.2'2

()._L{}

\\ '-'2' 7 4.35 1\\(, :1 1 1..6 l \\

S.40 6.4'7 4~ ~.LlS

\\ \\ 3S 1 ~.--j~ \\/ 12 2.60\\ 4. 2 4 t-~. i4 4

~~.2 '1.2.?

o. _'~_5 1 \\ 1.4 l\\ 7Li.42

\\ -,.

(.,~ 2.599

=3. ~2 G i:~4 '32.2 Ci. "?o V-

, 1 S, 74.45 \\7.'iN~ 2

. ~O~ 2. gC; b '4b '2.9. G., '1.'74 (;124 10.20

\\ \\ S C, 7 4.~){ \\ 7, ~'1 2 *60S' z.~~ 6.4(' 29.0 I~.-19 120, 74.50 i '?.'04 2.6 f'\\ 3 2.*~O (), L\\ 7 '2 ~ :.s G. <Q \\

'-IiI Q.2 S

' 202 1<.,11\\(2. T SAJv1 r l E Co l CL It inN

\\ 3A <<

SAM t: lE rot-1\\ r l ~ n -"

2 L

r: IPFC.

0.5 L

'I P~c.

\\ 3 '-14 "UKP QF~

Equipment Used Equipment Identification #

YSI 556 MPS Reauer :.IIld 5563 Sonde 5'

turhidity meter 200 '10 429 3

~OTES AND OBSERVATIONS:

Total volume purgeu \\). Li 0 gal Depth anu Depth to Water (DTW) measurements are given in feet from top of ~a s ing.

Groundwater Elevation mea\\urerm:nts are given in feet msl.

CLIENT:

SITE:

WEATHER:

GZA GeoEnvironmental of New York Waterioo Sampling Data ~heet Enlergy. !PEC PROJECT NO:

Bu~ hll1lap, NY

\\

I Mo$1 '1 5UVlYlT, vJ Vld ( 60 $

DATE:

SAMPLER(S):

SAMPLING INTERVAL (depth in ft below top of cuma)

TOTAL VOLUME PURGED:

170.'3 10 200.4-WELL 10: MW hQ -~

SAMPLE lD:

0 13 01.0011869.92 t 5 ~ O 10 Q. S' 5" gal PURGE RATE: ~

(gall min)

SAMPLING PORT

\\Jb PURGE METHOD:

Double Valve Pump WATER QUALITY:

Purged Volume Specific Dissolved Turbidity DriveIVent Drive Pressure Time Temp

('lC)

Conductivity pH (SU)

ORP (gal)

(Skm)

Oxygen (gil) lNTU)

Cycle (seconds)

(psi) 1\\ nS("b c('")

t'l? Mt nN G I S 31

'\\.f on o

0 \\

t~. 5~ 0.,-,2 2.. ::&\\

~. 2 Z.

-~

1 I'

\\ \\ 0 s-0.05 \\ 5.<iSS" a:Tl) 2

. ~o Q. (j-e

~. t.,.=3 £..

C\\

.~ 7

\\ \\

\\ ~

O. \\n

\\h. 2S' Q'),-l b S-L C::;~

'7 _ D o.2n I b. (") 2-0.,(

... \\

O

. ~~ 7.44

~~

  • 95~.f/(

\\I l.\\ 0 o. 2S 1c,.b9 O.f (., \\

0.,0 '7. '"' U. - -, \\.~

~,U i' ~ o 0.30

\\,.., <;( I 0.<160 O, Sc...

I.,4

~7~

~

I q

\\ I S5 0.35

\\ b S?7 O./htJ o. ~S' I

. '7C..

._ ~.u..4

~.

\\ o

\\2o ~

o 40

, &,,'10 0.'7 59 0.54 I '79

_C:j 1.\\

S?. \\ t..

~"

- ~

\\ 2 04-Pu(v1 e oFP

\\ 20 b sThtl.'l

<SAM ~ Lf CoLl£ ~1l<9N

" ~2 9

~AM rLE COM pj 1£'tB)

2.

L

tt'F ~

o.S' 1

'-:-tf'-f II"

\\3 29

!PuMP C I t-=F Equipment Used Equipment Identincatlon II YSI 556.'vIPS Reader :md 5563 Sonde I

lumidity meIer 2 0 0 '7 0 L.f 2 '1' 3

'tIOTES.\\NO OBSF.RVA nONS:

GZA GeoEnvironmental of New York Waterloo Sampling Data ~heet CLIENT:

Enlergy. !PEC PROJECT NO:

SITE:

WEATHER:

Buchanan. NY

\\

\\

M.Sy,,,,,J. '.~.h"d" hQ 5 T'

-r DATE:

SAMPlER(S):

SAMPLING INTERVAL (deptb m n below top oleum&)

TOTAL VOLUME PURGED:

\\47.4 10 WELLID: MW-6D-~

SAMPLE ID:

0 \\ 3 01.0017869.9'2, S1 \\0 \\0

1. <9 5" gal PURGE RA TE: ~

(gal / min)

SAMPLING PORT PURGE METHOD:

Double Valve Pump

2.

WATER QUALITY:

Purged Volume SpecifiC Dissolved Turbidity DrivelVent Drive Pressure Time (gal)

Temp (0e)

Conductivity Oxygen (gil) pH (SU)

ORP (NTU)

Cyde (seconds)

(psi)

(S/cm)

J

\\OSb 0

J'..u Me ON 6 15 31

\\\\nn 0, 0

\\

14 :7 2 I.'l? 3?'

\\.(0

~.-71

-Ib.9 I

I~n~

0. 2

\\4"1\\

L<6(' ~

o

_ ~o

~

_-lf

_1'.\\

lo,9'l(

\\ \\ \\ '3 0.4

\\4,2

, -~_~ G.

o.. 4~

G.~':i -/1.4

..,. 2~

\\ I 2. \\

O. h

\\ 4. ~2 1.9,0, 0.36 7. 0 t 5~.u.

fs".IS

\\ \\ '?In

r.. <;? 5 14.1 \\?

1.9 It-4 o.3a 1.O't.?

-. Sf.,:3

'}. b"3 l \\ 4 a

\\ 0

\\ L\\.bS

\\.C1hS<

n.29

,. I c;-

_t.."'7. 1 7.09 11 So I 2

\\,4."72

1. 9 b'1 0.2.1 7

I k'

-.,t&:.2

.~. \\? Sl

\\ \\ S5

, 4

\\4.74

\\.9b9 025 I

r'9

_1{L.b 6.<;0 J 2 o~

I. b L~

, 7ci 1

. ~b7 0.25 7.20 -'X>2.2 6.rb 12 0 5?

\\. 1?

\\ ~ 1? I

\\ '1 be; 0.2.4 7. 2..1

'f( 4. '7 f) 72 f1

~

1 2o~

f_uM()

. o£-~

12,0 c~e. r

_~t-J }LF Co.l E-<: 1\\0 fJ

_\\ 2 32 c;s,.Af...,f ~ LE Col ~ eU~TI( ~

~

2-L

':l:f :EC

<D..s L

r ( 'E_C.

12 _3"z (J LJ (v1 P o f F Equipment Used Equipment Identification If YSI 556.... IPS ReaJer Jnd 5563 Sonde b

rurbl(Jily meIer 200 '10429:3

~OTES.\\ND 08SF.RVAfIONS:

CLIENT:

SITE:

WEATHER:

GZA GeoEnvironmental of New York Waterloo Sampling Data ~heet Enlergy. !PEC Buchanan. NY

\\

6...... 1"

2"on1' w !1d Y

_ ~..

PROJECT NO:

DATE:

SAMPLER(S):

SAMPLING INTERVAL (depth In n below lop or asia&)

TOTAL VOLUME PURGED:

\\ 2 Lj.~

10

\\'='1.4 WELL ID: MW bQ -135 SAMPLE ID:

D \\ 3 1.55 gal PURGE RATE: ~

(gall min)

SAMPLING PORT

\\35 3

WATER QUALITY:

Purged Volume Time T

("C)

(gal) emp Specific Conductivity IS/em)

Dissolved Oxygen (g/I)

\\oSU

\\, 00

o.,

\\ \\o~ o* i~

\\ \\ I 3 o 2~

\\4 4C-.

'2. 1 '7C~

0.39

\\, 30 n

',l")

\\ L1. -;r, ~ 2. 2o\\(

0, 2 '"'

0

.90 ILL34 2.2bO 0.20

'1 Sb I 20 lu. 40 2.2/0 C, I '1 i < 4.0

,, S'b PURGE METHOD:

pH ISU)

ORP 5.40 -hI. g 7. \\$?

-~. 2 7.37

-lo ~.9

- \\ \\ ~,S

'7.4 0

-I 3 q. ~

.- \\Q2. 0

\\ 2.. 2,

SAMPl+

GJI--(PJ,:: llEh

2.

L 0.;)

L

, 2 2. \\

Equipment Used YSI 556."IPS ReaJer Jnd 5563 Sonde turhidity meter

\\'OTES.'NO 08SERVA nONS:

Double Valve Pump Turbidity (NTIJ)

DrivdVenl Drive Pressure Cycle (~econdS)

(psi)

G / 5 3

f I ~

. 21 l

\\0. 02

~. o4-

>.itS

.=39 lQ, 4 "1 Equipment Identincation,

3 20n'lo ~ 29-3

CLIENT:

SITE:

WEATHER:

GZA GeoEnvironmental of New York Waterioo Sampling Data ~heet Enlergy. !PEC PROJECT NO:

Buchanan. NY tv1. Suo'()i ) v"tl rJ 4i 60 S DATE:

SAMPLER(S):

SAMPLING INTERVAL (depth Ia ft below top or cula&)

TOTAL VOLUME PURGED:

10 WELL 10: MW ~- 72 SAMPLE ID: 0 \\3 3,15 gal PURGE RATE: ~

(gall min)

SAMPLING PORT PURGE METHOD:

Double Valve Pump

12 WATER QUALITY:

Purged Volume Speciftc Diswlved Turbidity DriveIVent Drive Pressure, Time Temp

('lC)

Conductivity pH (SU)

ORP (gal)

(Slcm)

O'lygm (gil) lNTU)

Cycle (seconds)

(psi)

) 0 50 P0M P ON G Is

'3 1

,\\ 00 O.*2. C

, LL ~2 4.s-c..~

L b~

'1.D~

~34.0 15. ~ -,,-

\\. \\os

o. 40

\\ 4 47 4.401 0.9\\

7.2-&

.- 24.~

\\ 3. ;0

\\,,~

,0 75

\\ 4. 4s-U. 2 :2*d~..

o.c,~

7.3r b.2.

I ( ~5'

\\ \\ 2-\\

\\. I El 14.l4 4 l..j 12..~

0. 5"0

7. L\\ \\

+ 5.3

{1. 02.

\\}3~

_t

. ~~o IA

. 3~ 4.o1?K' o.. c::;n

/.4.3 4-\\7.\\

1020

\\ \\ 4 0 2.00 iU: 42 b, 0.\\:)9 0. 4 4-7, LIS 1-+29:'1

~. G:j7J

\\150 2.G.o

\\ 4 5'0 11 040 O.LJ2 7.4(..

1 *4.~ r. I

..,. ~C1

,, ss-

.~.oE) 14..51 4.03b 0

. 41 7.4-7

~~2.~

~.~

... I;

\\ \\ E:\\b fuM (' Oft='

\\ \\ ~ Ji?

5~(l\\

'2..\\ \\

SAM fLE COM Pl Err\\').

Z L TPEC.

O.S L

fi5E c

\\ 2, 1 PtJ~P IQF(:

Equipment Used Equipment Identification' YSI 556.\\lIPS Reader and 5563 Sonde 2

turbidity meIer 2 00/04293

~on:s AND OBSERVATIONS:

GZA GeoEnvironmental of New York Waterloo Sampling Data ~heet CLIENT:

PROJECT NO:

SITE:

DATE:

WEATHER:

SAMPLER(S):

SAMPLING lNTERV AL (depth In ft below top of culnl>

TOTAL VOLUME PURGED:

ljs.4 to 59.4 WEl~ 10: MWG!:L - 53 SAMPLE 10:

0 I 3 M.

WS 1.45 gal PURGE RATE: ~

(gall min)

SAMPLING PORT 53 PURGE METHOD:

WATER QUALITY:

Time Purged Volume

)

SpecifiC Dissolved (gal)

Temp

\\1 C)

Conductivity pH (SU)

(Skm)

Oxygen (gil)

ORP

\\42.,

\\ 4-::::',0 o.n5' IS.'i?2 3. \\o~

r. £+ \\

'- -ZT. \\

o.; s tS 32 3, o~3 1.5 6 7. IS-

~9.2 0,3'0

\\ t:\\.4Q

.~, 04'7 1.34-

.J.. ()."9 f). 50

\\ 5'. 3'1 3.0 \\ q

/.49 0.10 I. b3 f.CSI

' 503 I.b4

\\.0

\\5'.22

~. o 0 4 I. \\

\\,;l"\\

7,C)9

~2

. 5

\\ S'J Sl

\\. 3

\\ 5.2(;

3. 0 0 0 l. b9

(,5'9

33. 4

\\5\\ q 0.5 Equipment Used YS/ 556 \\-/PS Reader and 5563 Sonde curhldity meier

~()TES.\\ND 08SF.RVA nONS:

Double Valve Pump Turbidity (NTU)

~.97

<1. hI (0. 15 C;. lnO

';:).54 h. S7 DtiveiVent Drive Pressure Cycle (sFonds)

(psi)

.t.:)./ 7 2 0 5 f1 *7

2. 2.

(

Equipment Identification,.

2-2oolo~2'1~

CLIENT:

SITE:

WEATHER:

GZA GeoEnvironmental of New York Waterioo Sampling Data ~heet PROJECT NO:

DATE:

SAMPlER(S):

SAMPLING lNTERV AL (dtptb m ft below top of cumll TOT AL VOLUME PURGED:

24,9 to 39,4 WELL 10: MW.b.Q - ~

SAMPLE ID:

0 \\ ?

01.0017869.92 5 1\\0 / 10 M, Bg,Crt:>$

I 0 5 gal PURGE RATE: ~

(gall min)

SAMPLING PORT 3'5 7

PURGE METHOD:

Double Valve Pump WATER QUALITY:

Purged Volume Specific Dissolved Turbidity Drive/Vent Drive Pressure Time Temp 1°C)

Conductivity pH (SU)

ORP (gal)

(S/em)

O"ygen (gil)

INTU)

Cycle (~econds)

(psi)

\\ 4 L3 0

Ptl~ IP ON 5 / 7 20

\\ ~30 o. \\ S-

\\S,23

,3. 23 1. '99

6. 9~

2 5'C :~ -

5 'f '1 22..

\\ l..\\3S-0.20

)SA.S 3. 1C,4 2.02 7

. ~'

\\,?{9.3 l?OS

\\ q4 \\

(') 3(\\

\\5.bL-3. 1 \\ q

?l'\\4

~.Ob q9\\

C;.3*7

' Ll Sb 0.40

\\ f-" I q 3.0'1 \\

2.02-Q 03

'L~.9 4 21

'\\ 4155 n.~[)

\\ b _ 2"

~.D5~ 2.01

-, ~1

~

, 2

~.g c..

l S03 o bO

\\ (; 4Q

.1020 2

.z,." 2-7c:.4 3. f'.)

~.5~

ISO)?

o In Ie,. 50

~.ooo 2.5S 7.60

~3

)(

=3.4'7 15"13

().$?O

\\fJ.4C, 2.9bl 2. c... O

,, ~o - 3,4 3.39 I S, ~

o ~o

\\ b.4-i 2. 9 43 2,6 '2 "1 s-9 3.0

~. 42-15 19 PUM~

o.r~

\\520

~e.T SAMfl C CDI !CC"_TIO"J I s 5x sAM PLI CnM L[nt\\.

2..

L

~I I-C-0. 5 L

LI" I-- C

\\ 5 (v PuMP oF {:"

oJ Equipment Used Equipment Identification' YSI 556.'vIPS Reader and 5563 Sonde 3

twbidhy meter 2 00T70_~ 2 Cj 3

~OTES.\\ND 08S[RVATIONS:

FINAL QUARTERLY LONG-TERM GROUNDWATER MONITORING REPORT Q2 2010 (REPORT NO. 10)

APPENDIX F: DOSE CALCULATIONS

Facility Groundwater Flux Calculation Site Indian Point Prepared By:

JAS Job No. 17869.92 Reviewed By:

mjb Parameter Values:

Totals Total Catchment Zone (ft^2)

Total Improved Zone (ft^2)

Recharge (ft/yr)

Precipitation (ft/yr) 3,969,765 1,432,972 0.83 3.18 year Surface Area 2010 Northern Clean Zone Improved (ft^2)

Unit 2 North Improved Zone (ft^2)

Unit 1/2 Improved Zone (ft^2)

Unit 3 North Improved Zone (ft^2)

Unit 3 South Improved Zone (ft^2)

Southern Clean Improved Zone (ft^2) 0 148,214 433,904 316,210 321,290 213,354 Northern Clean Unimproved Zone (ft^2)

Unit 2 North Unimproved Zone (ft^2)

Unit 1/2 Unimproved Zone (ft^2)

Unit 3 North Unimproved Zone (ft^2)

Unit 3 South Unimproved Zone (ft^2)

Southern Clean Zone Unimproved (ft^2) 106,429 204,317 438,221 323,116 268,862 585,600 Discounted Area Within Zone Discounted Area Within Zone Discounted Area Within Zone Discounted Area Within Zone Discounted Area Within Zone Discounted Area Within Zone 50,265 0

291,186 106,718 17,730 144,347 Northern Clean Zone Catchment (ft^2)

Unit 2 North Catchment Zone (ft^2)

Unit 1/2 Catchment Zone (ft^2)

Unit 3 North Catchment Zone (ft^2)

Unit 3 South Zone (ft^2)

Southern Clean Zone (ft^2) 156,694 352,531 1,163,311 746,044 607,882 943,302 Activity (pCi/L)

Groundwater Northern Clean Zone Catchment Unit 2 North Unit 1/2 Unit 3 North Unit 3 South Zone Southern Clean Zone Upper Zone Before Canal 150 337 4,088 399 711 184 Lower Zone Before Canal 150 239 3,077 1,326 536 183 Northern Clean Zone Unit 2 North Unit 1/2 Unit 3 North Unit 3 South Zone Southern Clean Zone Upper Zone After Canal 150 256 3,290 322 711 184 Lower Zone After Canal 150 492 968 521 536 183 Stormwater Discharging to Canal (pCi/L)

Storm Water for Northern Clean Zone Storm Water for Unit 2 North Storm Water for Unit 1/2 Storm Water for Unit 3 North Storm Water for Unit 3 South Storm Water for Southern Clean Zone 1,831 0

1,119 377 NA Avg MH-4a NA Avg CB-14 and CB-34 Avg U3-CB-B8 Avg D1, C3, E6, & E10 Stormwater Discharging to River (pCi/L)

Storm Water for Northern Clean Zone Storm Water for Unit 2 North Storm Water for Unit 1/2 Storm Water for Unit 3 North Storm Water for Unit 3 South Storm Water for Southern Clean Zone 129 0

0 201 NA Avg. MH-1 and MH-12 Avg MH-14 Avg CB-15 NA Avg E13,CB-C2 Potential Water Received by Storm Drain System

=(Improved Area) x Precipitation Northern Clean Area Unit 2 North Unit 1/2 Unit 3 North Unit 3 South Southern Clean Zone Units 0

470,579 1,377,646 1,003,968 1,020,094 677,400 ft^3/yr 0

1,289 3,774 2,751 2,795 1,856 ft^3/day 0.00 6.70 19.61 14.29 14.52 9.64 GPM 0

13,325,316 39,010,581 28,429,198 28,885,854 19,181,845 L/Yr Water Directly Recharged to Aquifer from Precipitation

=Unimproved Area x Recharge Northern Clean Area Unit 2 North Unit 1/2 Unit 3 North Unit 3 South Southern Clean Zone Units 87,857 168,664 361,752 266,732 221,946 483,413 ft^3/yr 241 462 991 731 608 1,324 ft^3/day 1.25 2.40 5.15 3.80 3.16 6.88 GPM 2,487,841 4,776,030 10,243,665 7,553,005 6,284,809 13,688,731 L/Yr The total amount of water available to be received by the storm system is computed as the combined area of buildings and paved areas in the catchment multiplied by the annual precipitation rate. Note this conservatively assumes that the amount of water lost to the atmosphere or other sinks after precipitation has fallen on paved or built up surfaces is zero.

Note that this calculation reflects recharge to the aquifer in non-paved areas. The Recharge value listed above and used in this calculation reflects only that portion of precipitation that actually recharges the aquifer.

J:\\17,000-18,999\\17869\\17869-92.MG\\Q2-2010\\Dose Calculations\\

Appendix F - Q2 2010-dose calcs_FINAL.xlsx; Rainfall_model_H3 Page 1 of 3 Print Date: 1/21/2011

Facility Groundwater Flux Calculation Site Indian Point Prepared By:

JAS Job No. 17869.92 Reviewed By:

mjb Water Recharged to Aquifer (Direct Recharge Plus Storm Water Leakage Minus Building Drain Removal)

=(Direct Recharge + X% Water Received by Storm System) - (Y% x Water Removed by Building Drains)

Total Water Discharged to Aquifer

[Northern Clean Area Catchment + (0%

Storm Drain Water)]1

[Unit 2 North + (50% Storm Drain Water)]-[5gpm]

[Unit 1/2 Area Catchment + (30%

Storm Drain Water)]-

[7.5 gpm]

[Unit 3 North Area Catchment + (60%

Storm Drain Water)]-

[7.5gpm]

[Unit 3 South Area + (10%

Storm Drain Water)]

[Southern Clean Zone Area + (40% Storm Drain Water)]

Units 87,857 52,641 248,077 342,144 323,955 754,373 ft^3/yr 241 144 680 937 888 2,067 ft^3/day 1.25 0.75 3.53 4.87 4.61 10.74 GPM 2,487,841 1,490,627 7,024,746 9,688,431 9,173,395 21,361,469 L/Yr 1 There are no improved surfaces in Northern Clean Zone.

Groundwater Discharged to Canal

=Water Recharged to Aquifer x X% flowing to Canal Northern Clean Area Catchment x 0%

Unit 2 North x 15.2%

Unit 1/2 Area Catchment 24.2%

Unit 3 North Area Catchment x 22.9%

Unit 3 South Area x68.4%

Southern Clean Zone Area x 0%

Units 0

8,001 60,035 78,351 221,585 0 ft^3/yr 0

22 164 215 607 0 ft^3/day 0.00 0.11 0.85 1.12 3.15 0.00 GPM 0

226,575 1,699,989 2,218,651 6,274,602 0 L/Yr Groundwater Discharged to River

=Water Recharged to Aquifer x X% flowing to River x Y% Flowing in Appropriate Vertical Zone Northern Clean Area Catchment x 100% x 59.3%

Unit 2 North x 84.8% x 15.1%

Unit 1/2 Area Catchment x 75.8% x 11.7%

Unit 3 North Area Catchment x 77.1%

x 47.9%

Unit 3 South Area x 31.6% x 31.3%

Southern Clean Zone Area x 100% x 55.2%

Units 52,099 6,741 22,001 126,357 32,042 416,414 ft^3/yr 143 18 60 346 88 1,141 ft^3/day 0.74 0.10 0.31 1.80 0.46 5.93 GPM 1,475,290 190,872 622,997 3,578,025 907,322 11,791,531 L/Yr Northern Clean Area Catchment x 100% x Unit 2 North x 84 8% x Unit 1/2 Area Catchment 75 8% x Unit 3 North Area Catchment x 77 1% Unit 3 South Area Southern Clean Zone Upper Zone Upper and Lower Zone Upper and Lower Zone e

Catchment x 100% x 40.7%

Unit 2 North x 84.8% x 84.9%

Catchment 75.8% x 88.3%

Catchment x 77.1%

x 52.1%

Unit 3 South Area x 31.6% x 68.7%

Southern Clean Zone Area x 100% x 44.8%

Units 35,758 37,899 166,041 137,436 70,328 337,959 ft^3/yr 98 104 455 377 193 926 ft^3/day 0.51 0.54 2.36 1.96 1.00 4.81 GPM 1,012,551 1,073,180 4,701,761 3,891,756 1,991,471 9,569,938 L/Yr Water Remaining in Storm Drains and Discharged to Canal

=Storm Drain Water x X% Not Leaking to Groundwater and Not Discharging to River Northern Clean Area Catchment (0% Storm Drain Water)

Unit 2 North (45% Unit 2 North and 30% of Unit 1/2 Storm Drain Water). Plus 5 gpm (351k cf/yr) from U2 footing drain.

Unit 1/2 Area Catchment (0%

Storm Drain Water)

Unit 3 North Area Catchment (3% Unit 3 North Storm Drain Water)

Unit 3 South Area (3% Unit 3 North and 42% Unit 3 South Storm Drain Water)

Southern Clean Zone Area (30% Unit 1/2, 27%

Unit 3 North, 43% Unit 3 South, and 55% Southern Clean Zone Storm Drain Water)

Units 0

976,054 0

30,119 458,559 1,495,576 ft^3/yr 0

2,674 0

83 1,256 4,097 ft^3/day 0

13.89 0.00 0.43 6.53 21.29 GPM 0

27,640,118 0

852,876 12,984,935 42,349,990 L/Yr Water Remaining in Storm Drains and Discharged to River Northern Clean Area Catchment (0% Storm Drain Water)

Unit 2 North (5% Storm Drain Water)

Unit 1/2 Area Catchment (10%

Storm Drain Water)

Unit 3 North Area Catchment (7%

Storm Drain Water)

Unit 3 South Area (5% Storm Drain Water)

Southern Clean Zone Area (5% Storm Drain Water)

Units 0

23,529 137,765 70,278 51,005 33,870 ft^3/yr 0

64 377 193 140 93 ft^3/day 0

0.33 1.96 1.00 0.73 0.48 GPM 0

666,266 3,901,058 1,990,044 1,444,293 959,092 L/Yr Lower Zone J:\\17,000-18,999\\17869\\17869-92.MG\\Q2-2010\\Dose Calculations\\

Appendix F - Q2 2010-dose calcs_FINAL.xlsx; Rainfall_model_H3 Page 2 of 3 Print Date: 1/21/2011

Facility Groundwater Flux Calculation Site Indian Point Prepared By:

JAS Job No. 17869.92 Reviewed By:

mjb Flux Calculations Conceptual Model: Migration Pathway Summary Northern Clean Area Unit 2 North Unit 1/2 Unit 3 North Unit 3 South Southern Clean Zone GW 100% Upper and Lower Zone To River 84.8% Upper Zone and Lower Zone Flow To River.

15.2% Upper Zone and Lower Zone Flow to Canal 75.8% Upper Zone and Lower Zone To River. 24.2% Upper Zone and Lower Zone to Canal 77.1% Upper Zone and Lower Zone To River. 22.9% Upper Zone and Lower Zone to Canal 31.6% Upper Zone and Lower Zone To River. 68.4%

Upper Zone and Lower Zone to Canal 100% Upper and Lower Zone To River SW NA To Canal (Storm Water Considered Clean; Estimated at 5.5 GPM) and To River (5% Storm Water)

To Canal (60% Storm Water) and To River (10% Storm Water)

To Canal (33% Storm Water) and To River (7% Storm Water)

To Canal (85%

Storm Water) and To River (5%

Storm Water)

To Canal (55% Storm Water) and To River (5%

Storm Water)

Flux (pCi/Yr)

North Clean Area Unit 2 North Unit 1/2 Unit 3 North Unit 3 South South Clean Zone Total GW to River-Upper Zone 2.21E+08 4.88E+07 2.05E+09 1.15E+09 6.45E+08 2.17E+09 6.28E+09 GW to River-Lower Zone 1.52E+08 5.28E+08 4.55E+09 2.03E+09 1.07E+09 1.75E+09 1.01E+10 GW to Canal 0.00E+00 7.64E+07 6.95E+09 8.84E+08 4.46E+09 0.00E+00 1.24E+10 SW to Canal NA 5.06E+10 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 1.45E+10 1.60E+10 8.11E+10 SW to River NA 8.61E+07 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 1.93E+08 2.79E+08 Curies/Yr==>

0.11 Notes:

The recharge rate used herein, 26% of precipitation (~10 in/yr), is within the range of values discussed in the USGS modeling report1. The reported recharge ranged from 3.6 inches/year to 7.5 inches/year for a till to 20 inches per year for coarse grained glacially stratified deposits. A yearly rolling average precipitation value measured at the Facility meteorological station is also used in the computations. The catchment area was defined using an AutoCAD topo map for the Site and surrounding area. The catchment was defined by starting at the area marked "line of water grant" and tracking east, away from the River, to define portions of the land surface contributing water to the selected discharge zone. Calculations assume that run-off or overland flow in unimproved areas of the Site is negligible, there are no changes in storage and the Hudson River is a gaining stream.

1. USGS. Water Use, Ground-Water Recharge and Availability, and Quality of Water in the Greenwich Area, Fairfield County, Connecticut and Westchester County, New York, 2000-2002 J:\\17,000-18,999\\17869\\17869-92.MG\\Q2-2010\\Dose Calculations\\

Appendix F - Q2 2010-dose calcs_FINAL.xlsx; Rainfall_model_H3 Page 3 of 3 Print Date: 1/21/2011

FINAL QUARTERLY LONG-TERM GROUNDWATER MONITORING REPORT Q2 2010 (REPORT NO. 10)

APPENDIX G: UNIT 2 TRITIUM PLUME TREND ANALYSES

TABLE G1 MANN-KENDALL TREND EVALUATION

SUMMARY

TRITIUM IN GROUNDWATER NEAR UNIT 2 INDIAN POINT ENERGY CENTER BUCHANAN, NY Well ID Number of Data Points Number of Times below MDC Minimum Tritium Activity (pCi/L)

Maximum Tritium Activity (pCi/L)

Mann-Kendall Statistic (S)

Normalized Test Statistic (Z)

Probability Trend at 95%

Level of Significance MW-30-69 36 0

7.36E+04 6.01E+05

-159

-2.15 0.984 decreasing MW-30-84 23 0

3.78E+03 1.25E+04 35 0.90 0.815 no trend MW-31-49 35 0

2.98E+02 4.84E+04

-3

-0.03 0.511 no trend MW-31-63 23 0

5.00E+03 7.35E+04 64 1.66 0.952 increasing MW-31-85 23 0

3.17E+02 2.25E+04 102 2.67 0.996 increasing MW-32-59 22 0

4.13E+02 1.55E+05 31 0.85 0.801 no trend MW-32-85 21 0

5.42E+03 1.26E+04 30 0.88 0.809 no trend MW-32-149 18 0

1.99E+02 1.05E+04

-25

-0.91 0.818 no trend MW-32-173 16 0

4.31E+02 5.89E+03

-38

-1.67 0.952 decreasing MW-32-190 20 0

1.59E+03 1.13E+04

-124

-3.99 1.000 decreasing MW-33 24 0

2.30E+04 2.64E+05

-121

-2.98 0.999 decreasing MW-35 20 0

1.04E+03 1.19E+05

-88

-2.82 0.998 decreasing MW-36-24 16 2

1.54E+02 3.42E+04 20 0.86 0.804 no trend MW-36-41 11 0

6.11E+03 5.52E+04

-32

-2.41 0.992 decreasing MW-36-52 16 0

5.97E+03 2.68E+04

-84

-3.74 1.000 decreasing MW-37-22 18 0

2.26E+03 3.49E+04

-43

-1.59 0.944 no trend MW-37-32 18 0

2.49E+03 3.01E+04

-55

-2.05 0.980 decreasing MW-37-40 17 0

4.22E+03 1.70E+04

-100

-4.08 1.000 decreasing MW-37-57 18 0

4.05E+03 4.48E+04

-93

-3.48 1.000 decreasing MW-42-49 18 0

1.12E+03 7.22E+04

-41

-1.52 0.935 no trend MW-42-78 13 0

3.46E+02 1.28E+03

-26

-1.53 0.936 no trend MW-49-26 20 0

2.82E+03 1.54E+04

-158

-5.09 1.000 decreasing MW-49-42 20 0

2.20E+03 1.13E+04

-148

-4.77 1.000 decreasing MW-49-65 20 0

1.26E+03 5.76E+03

-129

-4.15 1.000 decreasing MW-50-42 21 4

1.01E+02 9.75E+03

-42

-1.24 0.892 no trend MW-50-66 25 0

2.08E+03 1.08E+04

-202

-4.69 1.000 decreasing MW-53-82 15 0

4.54E+02 1.32E+04

-5

-0.20 0.578 no trend MW-53-120 18 0

4.10E+03 9.61E+03

-93

-3.48 1.000 decreasing MW-55-24 14 0

7.82E+02 3.08E+03

-14

-0.71 0.762 no trend MW-55-35 13 0

8.53E+02 9.04E+03

-28

-1.65 0.950 decreasing MW-55-54 14 0

5.47E+03 1.31E+04

-31

-1.64 0.950 no trend MW-111 33 0

6.81E+03 5.78E+05

-219

-3.38 1.000 decreasing MW-66-21 13 0

8.28E+01 3.57E+03

-18

-1.04 0.850 no trend DOWNGRADIENT WELLS MW 66 21 13 0

8.28E 01 3.57E 03 18 1.04 0.850 no trend MW-66-36 12 0

3.05E+03 9.10E+03

-52

-3.50 1.000 decreasing MW-67-39 11 0

2.55E+03 5.07E+03

-35

-2.65 0.996 decreasing MW-67-105 12 0

1.54E+03 2.93E+03

-34

-2.26 0.988 decreasing MW-67-173 12 0

6.73E+02 1.05E+03

-29

-1.92 0.973 decreasing MW-67-219 11 0

9.22E+02 1.44E+03

-1 0.00 0.500 no trend MW-67-276 11 0

6.79E+02 1.18E+03 0

0.00 0.500 no trend MW-67-323 11 0

3.13E+02 1.29E+03 17 1.25 0.894 no trend MW-67-340 11 0

3.69E+02 6.69E+02 31 2.34 0.990 increasing Notes: Calculations based on Mann-Kendall trend evaluations as presented in U.S. EPA Practical Methods for Data Analysis, U.S. EPA QA/G-9 QA00 UPDATE, July 2000, Section 4.3.4 J:\\17,000-18,999\\17869\\17869-92.MG\\Q2-2010\\Dose Calculations\\Mann-Kendall\\Q2 2010 Mann_Kendall_Tests_jas.xlsx; Mann-Kendall Summary Page 1 of 18 Print Date: 1/13/2011

4 6

8 10 280,000 420,000 560,000 700,000 of Monthly Precipitation Tritium Activity (pCi/L)

MW-30 Tritium Activity Waterloo samples low flow samples *

1. MW-30-69: Packer Test (70-75')
  • low flow samples collected open hole 1

(see logarithmic plot for trend in MW-30-84)

FIGURE G1 0

2 0

140,000 Nov-05 May-06 Nov-06 May-07 Nov-07 May-08 Nov-08 May-09 Nov-09 May-10 Nov-10 Inches o MW-30-69 MW-30-84 Precipitation

6 9

100,000 1,000,000 es of Monthly Precipitation Tritium Activity (pCi-L)

MW-30 Tritium Activity (logarithmic)

Waterloo samples low flow samples *

1. MW-30-69: Packer Test (70-75')
  • low flow samples collected open hole 1

FIGURE G1a 0

3 1,000 10,000 Nov-05 May-06 Nov-06 May-07 Nov-07 May-08 Nov-08 May-09 Nov-09 May-10 Nov-10 Inche MW-30-69 MW-30-84 Precipitation

4 6

8 10 32,000 48,000 64,000 80,000 of Monthly Precipitation Tritium Activity (pCi-L)

MW-31 Tritium Activity low flow samples

  • Waterloo Samples
1. MW-31-49: Packer Test (43-52')
  • low flow samples collected open hole FIGURE G2 0

2 0

16,000 Nov-05 May-06 Nov-06 May-07 Nov-07 May-08 Nov-08 May-09 Nov-09 May-10 Nov-10 Inches o MW-31-49 MW-31-63 MW-31-85 Precipitation 1

4 6

8 10 64,000 96,000 128,000 160,000 nches of Monthly Precipitation Tritium Activity (pCi-L)

MW-32 Tritium Activity Waterloo Samples low flow sample *

  • low flow sample collected open hole
1. MW-32-131: Data below MDC.

Sample's activity results displayed.

FIGURE G3 0

2 0

32,000 Nov-05 May-06 Nov-06 May-07 Nov-07 May-08 Nov-08 May-09 Nov-09 May-10 Nov-10 In MW-32-59 MW-32-85 MW-32-131 MW-32-149 MW-32-173 MW-32-190 Precipitation 1

4 6

8 10 120,000 180,000 240,000 300,000 nches of Monthly Precipitation Tritium Activity (pCi/L)

MW-33 Tritium Activity FIGURE G4 0

2 0

60,000 Nov-05 May-06 Nov-06 May-07 Nov-07 May-08 Nov-08 May-09 Nov-09 May-10 Nov-10 In MW-33 Precipitation

4 6

8 10 120,000 180,000 240,000 300,000 nches of Monthly Precipitation Tritium Activity (pCi/L)

MW-34 Tritium Activity FIGURE G5 0

2 0

60,000 Sep-05 Jan-06 May-06 Sep-06 Jan-07 May-07 Sep-07 In MW-34 Precipitation

4 6

8 10 60,000 90,000 120,000 150,000 nches of Monthly Precipitation Tritium Activity (pCi/L)

MW-35 Tritium Activity FIGURE G6 0

2 0

30,000 Nov-05 May-06 Nov-06 May-07 Nov-07 May-08 Nov-08 May-09 Nov-09 May-10 Nov-10 In MW-35 Precipitation

4 6

8 10 24,000 36,000 48,000 60,000 hes of Monthly Precipitation Tritium Activity (pCi-L)

MW-36 Tritium Activity

1. Data below MDC. Samples' activity results displayed.

FIGURE G7 0

2 0

12,000 Nov-05 May-06 Nov-06 May-07 Nov-07 May-08 Nov-08 May-09 Nov-09 May-10 Nov-10 Inc MW-36-24 MW-36-41 MW-36-52 Precipitation 1

4 6

8 10 20,000 30,000 40,000 50,000 nches of Monthly Precipitation Tritium Activity (pCi-L)

MW-37 Tritium Activity FIGURE G8 0

2 0

10,000 Nov-05 May-06 Nov-06 May-07 Nov-07 May-08 Nov-08 May-09 Nov-09 May-10 Nov-10 In MW-37-22 MW-37-32 MW-37-40 MW-37-57 Precipitation

4 6

8 10 6,000 9,000 12,000 15,000 Inches of Monthly Precipitation Tritium Activity (pCi-L)

MW-42 Tritium Activity MW4249: Tritiumdataon

3/16/09equals72,200pCi/L FIGURE G9 0

2 0

3,000 Nov-05 May-06 Nov-06 May-07 Nov-07 May-08 Nov-08 May-09 Nov-09 May-10 Nov-10 I

MW-42-49 MW-42-78 Precipitation

4 6

8 10 8,000 12,000 16,000 20,000 Inches of Monthly Precipitation Tritium Activity (pCi-L)

MW-49 Tritium Activity FIGURE G10 0

2 0

4,000 Nov-05 May-06 Nov-06 May-07 Nov-07 May-08 Nov-08 May-09 Nov-09 May-10 Nov-10 I

MW-49-26 MW-49-42 MW-49-65 Precipitation

4 6

8 10 6,000 9,000 12,000 15,000 nches of Monthly Precipitation Tritium Activity (pCi-L)

MW-50 Tritium Activity

1. Data below MDC. Samples' activity results displayed.

FIGURE G11 0

2 0

3,000 Nov-05 May-06 Nov-06 May-07 Nov-07 May-08 Nov-08 May-09 Nov-09 May-10 Nov-10 In MW-50-42 MW-50-66 Precipitation 1

1 1

1

4 6

8 10 6,000 9,000 12,000 15,000 nches of Monthly Precipitation Tritium Activity (pCi-L)

MW-53 Tritium Activity FIGURE G12 0

2 0

3,000 May-06 Nov-06 May-07 Nov-07 May-08 Nov-08 May-09 Nov-09 May-10 Nov-10 In MW-53-82 MW-53-120 Precipitation

4 6

8 10 8,000 12,000 16,000 20,000 Inches of Monthly Precipitation Tritium Activity (pCi-L)

MW-55 Tritium Activity FIGURE G13 0

2 0

4,000 May-06 Nov-06 May-07 Nov-07 May-08 Nov-08 May-09 Nov-09 May-10 Nov-10 MW-55-24 MW-55-35 MW-55-54 Precipitation

6 9

12 15 320,000 480,000 640,000 800,000 nches of Monthly Precipitation Tritium Activity (pCi-L)

MW-111 Tritium Activity FIGURE G14 0

3 0

160,000 May-05 Nov-05 May-06 Nov-06 May-07 Nov-07 May-08 Nov-08 May-09 Nov-09 May-10 Nov-10 I

MW-111 Precipitation

4 6

8 10 6,000 9,000 12,000 15,000 Inches of Monthly Precipitation Tritium Activity (pCi-L)

MW-66 Tritium Activity 1.Q1 2010analyticalresultsforMW6621andMW6636were

interchangedtocorrectasamplemisidentificationafterinspectingthe

datatrendsinbothsamplingports(bothhistoricandforQ22010).

FIGURE G15 0

2 0

3,000 May-07 Nov-07 May-08 Nov-08 May-09 Nov-09 May-10 Nov-10 I

MW-66-21 MW-66-36 Precipitation 1

1

4 6

8 10 2,400 3,600 4,800 6,000 Inches of Monthly Precipitation Tritium Activity (pCi-L)

MW-67 Tritium Activity FIGURE G16 0

2 0

1,200 May-07 Nov-07 May-08 Nov-08 May-09 Nov-09 May-10 Nov-10 MW-67-39 MW-67-105 MW-67-173 MW-67-219 MW-67-276 MW-67-323 MW-67-340 Precipitation





0.00 0.01 0.02 0.03 0.04 0.05 Bounding Q2 2007 Q3 2007 Q4 2007 Q1 2008 Q2 2010 0.029 0.025 0.023 0.022 0.019 0.018 0.018 0.016 0.016 0.016 0.017 0.021 0.019 0.017 0.015 0.014 0.012 0.011 0.011 0.010 0.011 0.010 Q3 2008 Q4 2008 Q1 2009 Q2 2009 Q3 2009 Q4 2009 Q1 2010 0.010 0.013 Quarterly Total Tritium Activity (Ci)

Changes in Total Estimated Tritium Plume Activity Over Time Upper Estimate of Total H3 Activity Lower Estimate of Total H3 Activity Note: Lower estimate is based on a porosity of 0.0003 which was derived from a pumping test conducted in 2006. Upper estimate is based on a porosity of 0.003 derived from a tracer test conducted in 2007. The Q2 2007 to Q1 2010 Tritium plume activity estimates are each based on Tritium levels measured in the groundwater monitoring installations at individual, quarterly snapshots in time.

  • The bounding activity estimate, however, encompasses a longer period of time, and is focused on the Tritium levels existing during the earliest portions of the groundwater investigation. During this period of time, before termination of all the identified SFP leaks, Tritium concentrations were at their highest levels, but the network of monitoring installations was still being installed. Therefore, measurements made at a multiple times were required to capture early data covering the full extent of the Tritium plume; primarily over the period from Nov 20005 through Nov 2006 (a smaller percentage of the Tritium levels required inclusion of measurements through Sept 07). For the bounding Tritium plume activity estimate, the highest value recorded for each monitoring location during this time period was used in the analysis. For further discussion see Sections 6.0, 7.0 and 8.0 of the Final Hydrogeologic Site Investigation Report, prepared by GZA and dated January 7, 2008.

0.03 0.00 0.06 0.09 0.12 0.15 0.0981 86% overall reduction 0.149 The bounding curve of total Unit 2 Tritium activity as a function of time approximates a first order decay approaching a positive, horizontal asymptote. As such, the curve is consistent with that expected after elimination of all leaks from the Unit 2 SFP, but with a small continuing release of Tritium to the groundwater. The ongoing input to the groundwater is attributed to the historically leaked Tritium which is now being slowly released from storage (retention mechanism CSM).

A relatively horizontal asymptote would be expected to persist until the majority of this stored Tritium is purged from the retention mechanism.

0 0.02 0.04 0.06 0.08 0.1 0.12 0.14 0.16 Nov05 Nov06 Nov07 Nov08 Nov09 Nov10 Nov11 Activity,Ci ExponentialDecayCurveFittingforEstimatedActivity UpperEstimate LowerEstimate asymptotes=0.013 Ci(upper),0.008Ci(lower) r2 =0.9930(upper),0.9937(lower) 28% reduction since Q2 2007 Bounding*

Bounding* Total Tritium Plume Activity (Ci)

Figure G-17

FINAL QUARTERLY LONG-TERM GROUNDWATER MONITORING REPORT Q2 2010 (REPORT NO. 10)

APPENDIX H: SOUTHERN BOUNDARY WELLS

TEMPORAL TRITIUM TRENDS IN SOUTHERN BOUNDARY WELLS 3

4 5

175 250 325 ipitation (in) vity (pCi/L)

MW40 MW-40-27 MW-40-46 MW-40-81 MW-40-100 MW-40-127 MW-40-162 Rainfall 0

1 2

3 4

5

-50 25 100 175 250 325 Jan-07 Apr-07 Jul-07 Oct-07 Jan-08 Apr-08 Jul-08 Oct-08 Jan-09 Apr-09 Jul-09 Oct-09 Jan-10 Apr-10 Jul-10 Daily Precipitation (in)

Tritium Activity (pCi/L)

MW40 MW-40-27 MW-40-46 MW-40-81 MW-40-100 MW-40-127 MW-40-162 Rainfall 0

1 2

3 4

5

-50 25 100 175 250 325 Jan-07 Apr-07 Jul-07 Oct-07 Jan-08 Apr-08 Jul-08 Oct-08 Jan-09 Apr-09 Jul-09 Oct-09 Jan-10 Apr-10 Jul-10 Daily Precipitation (in)

Tritium Activity (pCi/L)

MW40 MW-40-27 MW-40-46 MW-40-81 MW-40-100 MW-40-127 MW-40-162 Rainfall 3

4 5

175 250 325 Precipitation (in) m Activity (pCi/L)

MW51 MW-51-40 MW-51-79 MW-51-104 MW-51-135 MW-51-163 MW-51-189 Rainfall Hi FIGURE H1 0

1 2

3 4

5

-50 25 100 175 250 325 Jan-07 Apr-07 Jul-07 Oct-07 Jan-08 Apr-08 Jul-08 Oct-08 Jan-09 Apr-09 Jul-09 Oct-09 Jan-10 Apr-10 Jul-10 Daily Precipitation (in)

Tritium Activity (pCi/L)

MW40 MW-40-27 MW-40-46 MW-40-81 MW-40-100 MW-40-127 MW-40-162 Rainfall 0

1 2

3 4

5

-50 25 100 175 250 325 Jan-07 Apr-07 Jul-07 Oct-07 Jan-08 Apr-08 Jul-08 Oct-08 Jan-09 Apr-09 Jul-09 Oct-09 Jan-10 Apr-10 Jul-10 Daily Precipitation (in)

Tritium Activity (pCi/L)

MW51 MW-51-40 MW-51-79 MW-51-104 MW-51-135 MW-51-163 MW-51-189 Rainfall

Retrieved from "https://kanterella.com/w/index.php?title=ML12094A117&oldid=5261687"