Letter Sequence Request |
---|
|
|
MONTHYEARML1113707352011-05-17017 May 2011 Acceptance Review Email, License Amendment Request, Revise Technical Specification Applicability and Action Language for Revised Fuel Handling Accident Analysis Project stage: Acceptance Review ML1206800622012-02-22022 February 2012 Attachment to Email, Issues Related to 10 CFR 50.59 Evaluation - License Amendment Request, Revise Technical Specification Applicability and Action Language for Revised Fuel Handling Accident Analysis Project stage: Request ML1206800532012-02-22022 February 2012 Email, Issues Related to 10 CFR 50.59 Evaluation - License Amendment Request, Revise Technical Specification Applicability and Action Language for Revised Fuel Handling Accident Analysis Project stage: Request ML1209401712012-04-25025 April 2012 Issuance of Amendment No. 235, Revise Technical Specification Applicability and Action Language for Revised Fuel Handling Accident Analysis Project stage: Approval 2012-02-22
[Table View] |
|
---|
Category:E-Mail
MONTHYEARML23348A1222023-12-14014 December 2023 NRR E-mail Capture - Grand Gulf, River Bend, and Waterford, Unit 3 - 2nd Round of Official RAIs for RR EN-RR-22-001, Use ASME Code Case N-752, Risk Informed Categorization for Class 2 and 3 Systems ML23097A0412023-04-0606 April 2023 June 2023 Emergency Preparedness Exercise Inspection - Request for Information ML23076A0552023-03-13013 March 2023 EP Program Inspection RFI Hjs 10132022 ML23072A3672023-03-0909 March 2023 NRR E-mail Capture - Entergy Fleet - Acceptance Review of Quality Assurance Program Manual Reduction in Commitment ML23052A0882023-02-17017 February 2023 Inspection Request for Information ML22335A4802022-12-0101 December 2022 NRR E-mail Capture - NRC Update Completion Date for Waterford 3 LAR to Adopt TSTF-505 ML22336A0202022-12-0101 December 2022 NRR E-mail Capture - Acceptance Review for Waterford Unit 3 - License Amendment Request to Revise Technical Specification 3/4.3.2 ML22329A0152022-11-0202 November 2022 NRR E-mail Capture - NRC Update Completion Date for Waterford 3 LAR to Adopt TSTF-505 ML22290A0442022-10-13013 October 2022 December 2022 Emergency Preparedness Program Inspection - Request for Information ML22215A2062022-08-0303 August 2022 NRR E-mail Capture - Waterford 3 - LAR to Adopt Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations, Section 50.69: Loe and Completion Date Update ML22215A1492022-08-0303 August 2022 NRR E-mail Capture - Waterford 3 - LAR to Permit the Use of Risk-Informed Completion Times in Accordance with Technical Specifications Task Force (TSTF) Traveler TSTF-505, Revision 2 ML22206A0172022-07-22022 July 2022 NRR E-mail Capture - Request for Additional Information: Waterford 3 - License Amendment Requests to Adopt 10 CFR 50.69 and TSTF-505 ML22206A0152022-07-21021 July 2022 NRR E-mail Capture - Entergy (Grand Gulf, River Bend, and Waterford-3) - Acceptance Review of the RR EN-RR-22-001, Case N-752, Risk-informed Cat & Treatment for Repair/Replacement Activities in Class 2 & 3 Systems ML22209A1082022-07-15015 July 2022 NRR E-mail Capture - Draft RAIs to License Amendment Request for Application to Adopt 10 CFR 50.69 and Revise Technical Specifications to Adopt TSTF-505, Revision 2 ML22144A1662022-05-24024 May 2022 PI&R Request for Information and Transmittal e-mail ML22108A1792022-04-14014 April 2022 WF3 Cpcs Installation Inspection Plan Email ML22209A1062022-01-20020 January 2022 NRR E-mail Capture - (External_Sender) Options Moving Forward Regarding Waterford TSTF-505 and 50.69 ML22209A1052022-01-0606 January 2022 NRR E-mail Capture - Estimate for Completion of 50.69-TSTF-505 Peer Review ML22012A1592022-01-0505 January 2022 WF3 2022 EP Exercise Inspection RFI Sdh 010522 ML21356A5872021-12-22022 December 2021 NRR E-mail Capture - Acceptance for Review: Waterford 3 - Proposed Revision to Reactor Vessel Surveillance Capsule Withdrawal Schedule ML21349A2242021-12-14014 December 2021 NRR E-mail Capture - (External_Sender) Waterford 3 - Request for One-Time Exemption from 10 CFR 50, Appendix E Biennial EP Exercise ML21312A4792021-11-0505 November 2021 Email: NRC Staff Preliminary Questions Regarding X Energy LLC Xe-100 Topical Report: Risk-Informed Performance-Based Licensing Basis Development ML21308A5602021-11-0404 November 2021 NRR E-mail Capture - Arkansas Nuclear One, Units 1 and 2, Grand Gulf, River Bend, and Waterford, Unit 3 - Acceptance Review of LAR to Adopt TSTF-554, Revise Reactor Coolant Leakage Requirements ML21292A0112021-10-18018 October 2021 NRR E-mail Capture - ANO, 1 and 2, Grand Gulf, River Bend, Waterford, 3 - Acceptance Review of LAR to Adopt TSTF-541, Add Exceptions to Surveillance Requirements for Valves and Dampers Locked in the Actuated Position ML21280A0812021-10-0505 October 2021 Email 10-5-21 - Request for Information_ Waterford EP Inspection (71114.04 & 71151) - Nov-Dec 2021 ML21285A0242021-10-0505 October 2021 Digital Instrumentation and Control Modification Inspection Request for Information ML22112A1512021-08-0606 August 2021 NRR E-mail Capture - for Review: Draft RAIs to LAR to Relocate Chemical Detection Systems Technical Specifications (TS) to Technical Requirements Manual (TRM) ML21216A4562021-08-0404 August 2021 WF3 2021 EP Exercise Inspection Request for Information (RFI) ML21218A0402021-07-26026 July 2021 NRR E-mail Capture - Final RAIs to Entergy Operations, Waterford Steam Electric Station, Unit 3 LAR to Adopt 10 CFR 50.69 ML21201A0062021-07-19019 July 2021 NRR E-mail Capture - Arkansas Nuclear One, Units 1 and 2, and Waterford, Unit 3 - Acceptance Review of LAR to Adopt TSTF-577, Revised Frequencies for Steam Generator Tube Inspections ML21173A1082021-06-22022 June 2021 NRR E-mail Capture - Acceptance Review for Waterford Unit 3 - License Amendment Request to Adopt TSTF-563 ML21174A0342021-06-22022 June 2021 NRR E-mail Capture - Entergy Fleet (ANO, Ggulf, Rbend, & Waterford) - Acceptance Review for Relief Request to Use a Provision of a Later Edition of the ASME Code, Section XI for Periodic System Pressure Tests Exemptions ML21160A0852021-06-0404 June 2021 NRR E-mail Capture - (External_Sender) NRC Notification to the State of Louisiana Regarding a Waterford Steam Electric Station, Unit 3 Amendment - Digital Upgrade I&C ML21145A0062021-05-24024 May 2021 NRR E-mail Capture - Supplement Received - Waterford Unit 3 - License Amendment Request for Boration Systems Tech Specs ML21120A1192021-04-30030 April 2021 NRR E-mail Capture - Acceptance Review for Waterford Unit 3 - LAR to Relocate Chemical Detection TSs to TRM ML21105A0512021-04-14014 April 2021 4-14-21 Email - RFI for In-Office Inspection of Recent WF3 Submission of EAL Procedure Revision ML21104A0382021-04-13013 April 2021 NRR E-mail Capture - Acceptance Review for Waterford Unit 3 - License Amendment Request for TSTF-505 ML21084A2552021-03-22022 March 2021 NRR E-mail Capture - Supplement to Audit Plan Dated October 1, 2020 (Waterford 3, L-2020-LLA-0164) ML21088A1512021-03-15015 March 2021 NRR E-mail Capture - Draft Waterford Acceptance Review Letter for TSTF-505 LAR ML21069A1842021-03-0202 March 2021 NRR E-mail Capture - Announcement of QA Inspection ML21040A3892021-02-0808 February 2021 NRR E-mail Capture - Announcement of QA Inspection ML21039A6412021-01-28028 January 2021 NRR E-mail Capture - NRC LIC-109 Acceptance Review Results for Waterford 3 50.69 LAR ML21022A1692021-01-22022 January 2021 NRR E-mail Capture - Entergy Fleet (ANO, Grand Gulf, River Bend, and Waterford) - Acceptance Review for RR EN-20-RR-003, Proposed Alternative to Use ASME Code Case N-711-2 ML20329A1442020-11-20020 November 2020 Terrapower QAPD Preliminary Questions Email ML20288A2082020-10-0808 October 2020 8Oct2020 Email - Request for Information (RFI) to Support and Prepare for the Emergency Preparedness (EP) Program Inspection at the Waterford 3 Station Scheduled to Occur the Week of December 7, 2020 ML20289A3502020-10-0505 October 2020 NRR E-mail Capture - NRC Request for Additional Information - WF3 EAL Scheme Change - L-2020-LLA-0122 ML20239B0552020-08-26026 August 2020 NRR E-mail Capture - NRC LIC-109 Acceptance Review Results for Waterford U3 Digital Upgrade LAR ML20197A3122020-07-14014 July 2020 NRR E-mail Capture - NRC Notification of State of Louisiana Re. Waterford Steam Electric Station License Amendments - Changes to Technical Specifications ML20191A0172020-06-26026 June 2020 NRR E-mail Capture - NRC LIC-109 Acceptance Review Results for Waterford U3 EAL Scheme Change LAR ML20093C3072020-04-0101 April 2020 NRR E-mail Capture - (External_Sender) Entergy Fleet - Performance-Based Cyber Security Testing Plan Fee Waiver Response Letter (EPID P-2020-PRF-0000; CAC No. 001648) 2023-04-06
[Table view] |
Text
From: STEELMAN, WILLIAM J [wsteelm@entergy.com]
Sent: Wednesday, February 22, 2012 3:27 PM To: Kalyanam, Kaly; Benton, Laray
Subject:
RE: ISSUES Related to Waterford 3 LAR, TAC No. ME6049 Attachments: NRC FHA Question 2-22-12.pdf Mr. Benton This is a follow up to the voice message that I left today. I have provided a writeup to address your question below. I would like to discuss the information to ensure that I have answered your question and addressed you concern.
Thanks Billy Steelman Waterford 3 504-273-3824 From: Kalyanam, Kaly [1]
Sent: Wednesday, February 15, 2012 1:46 PM To: STEELMAN, WILLIAM J
Subject:
FW: ISSUES Related to Waterford 3 LAR, TAC No. ME6049 Importance: High
- Billy, Could you please have the 50.59 evaluation, mentioned below, sent to the staff for review?
Thanks Kaly From: Benton, Laray Sent: Wednesday, February 15, 2012 1:55 PM To: Kalyanam, Kaly
Subject:
RE: ISSUES Related to Waterford 3 LAR, TAC No. ME6049 Importance: High
- Kaly, AADB staff would like to review the 10 CFR 50.59 evaluation that the licensee conducted that supports the indicated change to Waterfords current AOR for an postulated FHA. The reason for our request is because AADB cannot conduct a confirmatory analysis based on the currently docketed information available. Whereas if the AST was still the current AOR, I could have simply compared the licensees proposed changes against the docketed values provided in their AST amendment. However, being that their current AOR is no longer the AST analyses, but is now based on the AOR resulting from their change supported by their indicated 10 CFR 50.59 evaluation, I dont actually have any reference values to compare the proposed change against.
Therefore, I cant make a reasonable assurance finding on this LAR without reviewing the 10 CFR 50.59 evaluation to verify what the reference values for the current FHA AOR actually are.
Please let me know if you have any questions, comments, and/or concerns.
I have already forgiven you for your transgressions against me.
LaRay J. Benton United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC)
Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation Division of Risk Assessment Accident Dose Branch (AADB)
(301) 415-1088 From: Kalyanam, Kaly Sent: Monday, January 30, 2012 9:01 AM To: Benton, Laray Cc: STEELMAN, WILLIAM J
Subject:
RE: ISSUES Related to Waterford 3 LAR, TAC No. ME6049 Thanks, Billy, for the fast response.
- Laray, Please see below the licensees response. Let me know if there is any followup question and we can talk with the licensee.
Thanks Kaly From: STEELMAN, WILLIAM J [2]
Sent: Monday, January 30, 2012 8:56 AM To: Kalyanam, Kaly
Subject:
RE: ISSUES Related to Waterford 3 LAR, TAC No. ME6049 Kaly The differences between the Analysis of Record (AOR) and the original Alternate Source Term (AST) Safety Evaluation Report (SER) approved on 3/29/05 is since that time we have identified issues with the calculation, entered those into our corrective action program, and addressed them under the 10CFR50.59 process.
The criterion to evaluate whether NRC approval is required in the 10CFR50.59 process would be:
10CFR50.59(c)(2)(iii) Result in more than a minimal increase in the consequences of an accident previously evaluated in the final safety analysis report (as updated).
Since the difference between the AST SER and the AOR is a reduction (not an increase), it passes 10CFR50.59 criterion and does not require NRC approval.
Our submittal W3F1-2010-0009 identified the increase fuel failure does exceed the 10% criteria. Our submittal W3F1-2010-0009 Attachment 1 page 3 does ask for NRC approval of that change.
Thanks Billy From: Kalyanam, Kaly [3]
Sent: Thursday, January 26, 2012 11:07 AM To: STEELMAN, WILLIAM J
Subject:
FW: ISSUES Related to Waterford 3 LAR, TAC No. ME6049 Importance: High
- Billy, Can you have your engineers provide an answer?
Thanks Kaly From: Benton, Laray Sent: Thursday, January 26, 2012 12:01 PM To: Kalyanam, Kaly
Subject:
ISSUES Related to Waterford 3 LAR, TAC No. ME6049 Importance: High Kaly are you currently available for a discussion about this LAR. I have a general clarification question that I may have to ask the licensee if you are not able to answer it for me. Please consider the following:
In evaluating the licensees updated postulated FHA radiological dose consequences results, AADB staff used the following table as a comparison:
The concern that AADB will need for either you or the licensee to clarify is why is the ere an apparent difference between the doc cketed and/or submitted EAB, LPZ, and CR dose e values for the, 1) Baseline analysis of record (AAOR) as submitted in the LAR; 2) AST dose valu ues as document in Waterfords issued AST T amendment; and 3) Dose values as docketed in n the Waterford FSAR.
Can you or the licensee please explain the reason for the differences?
Baseline AOR (0.105 rem TEDE) and AST (0.10 Specifically, the CR values for the B 09 rem TEDE) exhibit more than a 10% diffference between the two values. Was there anotther license amendment that was approved betw ween when the AST amendment was issued until now that can document the change in values? ?
I think that both of these above state ed questions can be resolve with a simple telecon nference with the licensee, but we can send a formal RAI if desired. Thanks.
LaRay J. Benton Nuclear Physicist / Reactor Enginee er United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC)
Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation n Division of Risk Assessment Accident Dose Branch (AADB)
(301) 415-1088 From: Kalyanam, Kaly Sent: Monday, January 23, 2012 11:24 4 AM To: Wu, Shih-Liang; Hopkins, Ogbonna; Raval, Janak; Wood, Kent; Benton, Laray; Mazumdaar, Subinoy; Som, Swagata; Groves, Michael
Cc: Kalyanam, Kaly
Subject:
Waterford 3 LAR, TAC No. ME6049 Hi, This is regarding the Waterford 3 License Amendment Request to Revise the Technical Specifications Based Upon Revised Fuel Handling Accident (TAC No. ME6049) submitted by application dated April 13, 2011.
In order to meet the 1-year metrics, DORL staff needs all the SEs by March 20, 2012. I notice from the WPC records that the primary reviewers are: Shih-Liang Wu (SNPB),
Ogbonna Hopkins (SBPB), Janaki Raval (SCVB), Kent Wood (SRXB/SFT), and LaRay J. Benton (AADB). I presume that the review is on schedule and the SEs will be sent by 3/20/12.
The WPC records also indicated that that EICB (Subinoy Mazumdar), EEEB (Swagata Som), and ESTB (Ravinder Grover) will be concurring in the Amendment Package and, therefore, I do not expect any input from these 3 Branches. I will forward the Package, once put together, for parallel concurrence.
Thanks.
Kaly