ML12061A445

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Information Request for an NRC Triennial Permanent Modification and 10 CFR 50.59 (MOD/50.59) Baseline Inspection 05000461-12-007 (DRS)
ML12061A445
Person / Time
Site: Clinton Constellation icon.png
Issue date: 02/28/2012
From: Hironori Peterson
Engineering Branch 3
To: Pacilio M
Exelon Generation Co, Exelon Nuclear
Mohammad Munir
References
IR-12-007
Download: ML12061A445 (8)


See also: IR 05000461/2012007

Text

UNITED STATES

NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

REGION III

2443 WARRENVILLE ROAD, SUITE 210

LISLE, IL 60532-4352

February 28, 2012

Mr. Michael J. Pacilio

Site Vice-President, Exelon Generation Company, LLC

President and Chief Nuclear Officer (CNO), Exelon Nuclear

4300 Winfield Road

Warrenville IL 60555

SUBJECT: CLINTON POWER STATION INFORMATION REQUEST FOR AN NRC

TRIENNIAL PERMANENT MODIFICATION AND 10 CFR 50.59 (MOD/50.59)

BASELINE INSPECTION 05000461/2012007(DRS)

Dear Mr. Pacilio:

On June 25, 2012, the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) will begin a Modification

and 10 CFR 50.59 (MOD/50.59) baseline inspection at the Clinton Power Station. This

inspection will be performed in accordance with the NRC baseline Inspection Procedure

IP 71111.17. The on-site portion of the inspection will take place on June 25-29 and July 9-13.

Experience has shown that these baseline inspections are extremely resource intensive,

both for the NRC inspectors and the licensee staff. In order to minimize the inspection impact

on the site and to ensure a productive inspection for both parties, we have enclosed a request

for documents needed for the inspection. These documents have been divided into three

groups.

The first group of information is necessary to ensure that the inspection team is adequately

prepared for the inspection. This information should be made available via compact disc to

the Regional Office no later than May 1, 2012. The inspection team will review this information

by May 14, 2012, and will request specific items that should be available for review by

June 11, 2012.

The second group of requested documents contains additional items that the team will

review, or need access to, during the inspection. Certain documents contained within this

group, i.e., Item (1), will be requested for review in the Regional Office prior to the inspection.

The remaining documents should be available by the first day of the on-site inspection,

June 25, 2012.

The third group lists information necessary to aid the inspection team in tracking issues

identified as a result of the inspection. It is requested that this information be provided to the

lead inspector, as the information is generated during the inspection. It is important that all of

these documents are up to date and complete in order to minimize the number of additional

documents requested during the preparation and/or the on-site portions of the inspection.

M. Pacilio -2-

The lead inspector for this inspection is Mr. Mohammad Munir. We understand that our

regulatory contact for this inspection is Mr. Ron Frantz of your organization. If there are any

questions about the inspection or the materials requested, please contact the lead inspector at

(630) 829-9797 or via e-mail at mohammad.munir@nrc.gov.

This letter does not contain new or amended information collection requirements subject to

the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.). Existing information

collection requirements were approved by the Office of Management and Budget, control

number 3150-0011. The NRC may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to

respond to, a request for information or an information collection requirement unless the

requesting document displays a currently valid Office of Management and Budget control

number.

In accordance with 10 CFR 2.390 of the NRCs Rules of Practice, a copy of this letter and its

enclosure will be available electronically for public inspection in the NRC Public Document

Room or from the Publicly Available Records (PARS) component of NRCs document system

(ADAMS), accessible from the NRC Web site at http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/adams.html (the

Public Electronic Reading Room).

Sincerely,

/RA/

Hironori Peterson, Acting Chief

Engineering Branch 3

Division of Reactor Safety

Docket No. 50-461

License No. NPF-62

Enclosure: MODIFICATION AND 50.59 BASELINE INSPECTION DOCUMENT REQUEST

cc w/encl: Distribution via ListServ'

MODIFICATION AND 50.59 BASELINE INSPECTION DOCUMENT REQUEST

Inspection Report: 05000461/2012007(DRS)

Inspection Dates: June 25-29, 2012; and July 9-13, 2012

Inspection Procedures: IP 71111- 17, Evaluation of Changes, Tests, or

Experiments and Permanent Plant Modifications

Lead Inspector: Mohammad Munir, Lead Inspector

(630) 829-9797

I. Information Requested for In-Office Preparation Week

The following information is requested by May 1, 2012, or sooner, to facilitate the

selection of specific items that will be reviewed during the on-site inspection

week. The team will select specific items from the information requested below

and submit a list to your staff by May 14, 2012. We will request that certain items

be made available to the regional office prior to the inspection by June 11, 2012.

We request that the remaining items selected from the lists be available and

ready for review on the first day of inspection. All requested information should

cover the time frame from the receipt of information for the last Permanent

Modification inspection on February 13, 2009, to the present. If you have any

questions regarding this information, please call the team leader as soon as

possible.

(1) List of permanent plant modifications to systems, structures, or

components that are field work complete. (For the purpose of this

inspection, permanent plant modifications include permanent: plant

changes, design changes, set point changes, equivalency evaluations,

suitability analyses, and commercial grade dedications.)

The list should contain the number of each document, the title, the

revision (or date), and the affected system. In addition to the list, please

provide a description of each modification and a list of associated

calculations and affected procedures.

(2) List of all 10 CFR 50.59 completed evaluations involving: (a) calculations;

(b). procedure revisions; (c) changes to the facility (modifications);

(d) non-routine operating configurations; or (e) departures in methods of

analyses. This list should include 50.59 evaluations for the following:

a. Changes that have been made under the previsions of 10 CFR

50.59 that have been updated in accordance with 10 CFR

50.71(e)(4) since February 13, 2009;

1 Enclosure

MODIFICATION AND 50.59 BASELINE INSPECTION DOCUMENT REQUEST

b. Modifications that are field work complete; and

c. Changes to calculations (or initiation of new calculations) that

have been issued.

The list should contain the number and title of each document, a brief

description of the change, and the corresponding number and type of the

affected document (i.e., the modification or procedure to which the

evaluation applies). The list should NOT include any evaluations in which

prior NRC approval was sought and obtained.

(3) List of all 10 CFR 50.59 changes that have been screened out as not

requiring a full evaluation involving: (a) calculations; (b) procedure

revisions; (c) changes to the facility (modifications); (d) non-routine

operating configurations; or (e) departures in methods of analyses.

The list should contain the number and title of each document, a brief

description of the change, and the corresponding number and type of the

affected document (i.e., the modification or procedure to which the

evaluation applies).

(4) List of any modifications, procedure revisions, or UFSAR changes where

it was determined that 10 CFR 50.59 did not apply.

(5) List of calculation changes that have been issued for use.

(6) List of corrective action documents (open and closed) that address plant

permanent modification or 10 CFR 50.59 issues, concerns, or processes.

These documents should also include corrective action documents

associated with modification and MOD 50.59 change implementation.

The list should contain the number, title and revision (or date) of each

document, the affected system and corresponding documentation (if

applicable), and should be sorted in order of significance,

(7) Copies of procedures addressing the following: modifications, design

changes, set point changes, equivalency evaluations or suitability

analyses, commercial grade dedications, post-modification testing,

10 CFR 50.59 evaluation and screenings, and UFSAR updates.

(8) UFSAR updates submitted in accordance with 10 CFR 50.71(e)(4).

Provide copies of the complete submittal.

(9) Copy of the UFSAR change log (or a synopsis of changes). This should

include all of the changes made to the UFSAR that were incorporated in

the last 10 CFR 50.71(e)(4) submittal.

(10) Electronic copy of the UFSAR, if available

2 Enclosure

MODIFICATION AND 50.59 BASELINE INSPECTION DOCUMENT REQUEST

(11) Name(s) and phone numbers for the regulatory and technical contacts.

(12) Current management and engineering organizational chart.

II. Information Requested to be Available Prior to Inspection (Request will be

made by May 14, 2012, for availability of documents by June 11, 2012,

[Item 1]) or on First Day of Inspection (June 25, 2012), [Items 2, 3 and 4]

(1) Copies of all selected items from Section I. This includes copies of

associated documents such as calculations, post-modification test packages,

10 CFR 50.59 evaluations, or screenings, and any corrective action

documents.

(2) Copies of these documents do not need to be solely available to the team as

long as the inspectors have easy and unrestrained access to them.

a. Updated Final Safety Analysis Report;

b. Original FSAR Volumes;

c. Original SER and Supplements;

d. FSAR Question and Answers;

e. Quality Assurance Plan;

f. Technical Specifications;

g. Latest IPE/PRA Report;

h. Vendor Manuals; and

i. The Latest 10 CFR 50.59 FSAR Update Submittal.

(3) Please ensure that other supporting documents for the selected items have

been located and are readily retrievable as the team will likely be

requesting these documents during the inspections. Examples of

supporting documents are:

a. Drawings supporting the modifications;

b. Procedures affected by the modifications; and

c. UFSAR change papers generated due to a 10 CFR 50.59 evaluation.

(4) Current management and engineering organizational chart.

(5) Assessment and corrective Actions:

a. The most recent modification (MOD)/50.59 Quality Assurance (QA)

audit and/or self-assessment; and

b. Corrective action documents (e.g., condition reports, including status

of corrective actions) generate as a result of the most recent

MOD/50.59 Quality Assurance (QA) audit and/or self-assessment.

3 Enclosure

MODIFICATION AND 50.59 BASELINE INSPECTION DOCUMENT REQUEST

III. Information Requested to be provided throughout the inspection

(1) Copies of any corrective action documents generated as a result of the

teams questions or queries during this inspection.

(2) Copies of the list of questions submitted by the team members and the

status/resolution of the information requested (provide daily during the

inspection to each team member).

If you have questions regarding the information requested, please contact the team

leader.

4 Enclosure

M. Pacilio -2-

The lead inspector for this inspection is Mr. Mohammad Munir. We understand that our regulatory

contact for this inspection is Mr. Ron Frantz of your organization. If there are any questions about

the inspection or the materials requested, please contact the lead inspector at (630) 829-9797 or via

e-mail at mohammad.munir@nrc.gov.

This letter does not contain new or amended information collection requirements subject to the

Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.). Existing information collection

requirements were approved by the Office of Management and Budget, control number 3150-0011.

The NRC may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a request for

information or an information collection requirement unless the requesting document displays a

currently valid Office of Management and Budget control number.

In accordance with 10 CFR 2.390 of the NRCs Rules of Practice, a copy of this letter and its

enclosure will be available electronically for public inspection in the NRC Public Document Room or

from the Publicly Available Records (PARS) component of NRCs document system (ADAMS),

accessible from the NRC Web site at http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/adams.html (the Public

Electronic Reading Room).

Sincerely,

/RA/

Hironori Peterson, Acting Chief

Engineering Branch 3

Division of Reactor Safety

Docket No. 50-461

License No. NPF-62

Enclosure: MODIFICATION AND 50.59 BASELINE INSPECTION DOCUMENT REQUEST

cc w/encl: Distribution via ListServ'

DISTRIBUTION:

See next page

DOCUMENT NAME: Ltr. 022812 CLINTON MOD 50 59 RFI MXM.docx

Publicly Available Non-Publicly Available Sensitive Non-Sensitive

To receive a copy of this document, indicate in the concurrence box "C" = Copy without attach/encl "E" = Copy with attach/encl "N" = No copy

OFFICE RIII RIII

NAME MMunir:ls HPeterson

DATE 02/28/12 02/28/12

OFFICIAL RECORD COPY

Letter to Mr. Michael Pacilio from Mr. Hironori Peterson dated February 28, 2012.

SUBJECT: CLINTON POWER STATION INFORMATION REQUEST FOR AN NRC

TRIENNIAL PERMANENT MODIFICATIONS AND 10 CFR 50.59

(MOD/50.59) BASELINE INSPECTION 05000461/2012007(DRS)

DISTRIBUTION:

Breeda Reilly

RidsNrrDorlLpl3-2 Resource

RidsNrrPMClinton Resource

RidsNrrDirsIrib Resource

Chuck Casto

Cynthia Pederson

Jennifer Uhle

Steven Orth

Jared Heck

Allan Barker

Carole Ariano

Linda Linn

DRSIII

DRPIII

Patricia Buckley

Tammy Tomczak