ML12052A314

E-mail from A. Istar, NRR to G. Cheruvenki, NRR North Anna Question?

ML12052A314
Person / Time
Site:	North Anna
Issue date:	09/14/2011
From:	Ata Istar Division of License Renewal
To:	Ganesh Cheruvenki Division of Engineering
References
FOIA/PA-2011-0357
Download: ML12052A314 (3)

Text

Rocquecruz, Carla From: Istar, Ata \

Sent: Wednesday, September 14, 2011 10:55 AM To: Cheruvenki, Ganesh

Subject:

RE: North Anna Question?

THANKS.

\a U,'\

From: Cheruvenki, Ganesh Sent: Wednesday, September 14, 2011 10:54 AM To: Istar, Ata Cc: Tsirigotis, Alexander

Subject:

RE: North Anna Question?

Ata, Good analysis.

From: Medoff, James Sent: Wednesday, Septe',,,er 14, 2011 10:38 AM To: Istar, Ata Cc: Cheruvenki, Ganesh; Ng, Ching; Prinaris, Andrew

Subject:

RE: North Anna Question?

Ata:

If you have time, can you up and see me please regarding your email - I am in OWFN 111H3? I have not read what is assumed for the North Anna seismic basis in their UFSAR. That is how many OBE occurrences and SSE occurrences and loadings are assumed for in their UFSAR design basis and whether the recern-*eiai511-C -

event only exceeded their OBE basis or exceeded their SSE basis. Maybe you can explain what our position in RG 1.57 is for seismic evaluations.

Thanks, Jim ( I am acting BC for DLR's license renewal reactor systems review branch today and tomorrow)

From: Istar, Ata Sent: Wednesday, September 14, 2011 10:24 AM To: Sheikh, Abdul; Auluck, Rajender Cc: Medoff, James; Ho!ston, William

Subject:

RE: North Anna Question?

Referring to RG 1.57 "Design Limits and Loading Combinations...."

(1) Under Level B Service Limits: cyclic loadings are to be included to OBE, if OBE <= one-third of SSE.

I believe North Anna's OBE is one-half of SSE!

(2) Under Level C Service Limits: no cyclic loading added to SSE condition!

(3) Under Level D Se[vick. I.-.

1 cai dynamic loadings are to be added to SSE.

1 1-)

(

Should we consider "local dynamic loadings" as cyclic (fatigue) loading?

As well as referring to the Miner's Law, which stated that "in some circumstances, cycles of low stress followed by high stress cause more damage than would be predicted." But, I cannot find any regulatory position on this issue.

Ata Istar From: Sheikh, Abdul N -

Sent: Tuesday, September 13, 2011 10:09 AM To: Auluck, Rajender Cc: Istar, Ata; Medoff, James; Holston, William

Subject:

RE: North Anna Question?

I came up with the following issues:

Impact of August 2011 earthquake at North Anna on long term operations:

1. According to the North Anna UFSAR Table 5.2-4, faulted conditions (Design Basis Earthquake) are not included in the fatigue analysis of the plant components and structures. In addition, OBE earthquakes are also not included in the fatigue analysis. Therefore, fatigue analysis of the structures and components has to be revised to include the impact of the earthquake in August 2011 for the long term operation of the plant (40-60 years)

2. Fatigue analysis of the containment penetrations has not been performed previously. Therefore, according to the GALL Report, Rev. 2, a new fatigue analysis is required to be performed or the penetrations inspected for degradations during the long term operations (40-60 years)

3. Aging management programs for containment inservice examination (ASME Section Xl, Subsection IWE, Subsection IWL, Subsection IWF, and Appendix J tests) may have to be revised based on the post earthquake assessments. This may include more frequent inspections (augmented) and testing, especially if cracking or degradations is observed during the post earthquake walkdowns.

4. Aging management programs for structures, water controlled structures, and masonry walls may also have to be revised based on the post earthquake inspections. This may include more frequent inspections and testing, especially if cracking or degradations is observed during the post earthquake walkdowns.

From: Auluck, Rajender 1ý\

Sent: Tuesday, September"13, 2011 7:18 AM To: Sheikh, Abdul

Subject:

FW: North Anna Question?

FYI. We need to send our questions to DORL today.

raj From: Istar, Ata Sent: Monday, September 12, 2011 12:55 PM To: Auluck, Rajender

Subject:

North Anna Question?

2

Will the predicted cross-sectional properties at the end of the licensing period of SSCs be considered d*a t'*i.!tfi.al evaluations/analyses for the justification for continued operaltKr a s Ir. TrItelrf-.

"the predicted cross-sectional properties at the end of the licensing period" means: the cross-sectional properties of SSCs carried forward to the end of the period of extended operation by considering applicable wear-rate levels under normal operating conditions.

Ata ISTAR (301) 415-4049 ata. istar*,nrc..qov

<< OLE Object: Picture (Device Independent Bitmap) >> Reduce waste - print when necessary!

3