ML113420115
| ML113420115 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Braidwood  |
| Issue date: | 06/20/2011 |
| From: | Palagi B NRC/RGN-III/DRS/OLB |
| To: | Exelon Generation Co |
| Shared Package | |
| ML11167A133 | List: |
| References | |
| 50-456/11-301, 50-457/11-301 | |
| Download: ML113420115 (19) | |
Text
2011 BRAIDWOOD STATION INITIAL EXAMINATION ADMINISTRATIVE FILES
ES*201 Examination Preparation Checklist Form ES*201*1 Facility: E.I<A 11> h/ 0012 Date of Examination: j""Uhe. dD //
Developed by: Written - Facility ~ NRC II, Operating - Facility ~ NRC 0 Target Chief Date* Task Description (Reference) Examiner's Initials
-180 1. Examination administration date confirmed (C.1.a; C.2.a and b) {f
-120 2. NRC examiners and facility contact assigned (C.1.d; C.2.e) f3('
-120 3. Facility contact briefed on security and other requirements (C.2.c) 8P
-120 4. Corporate notification letter sent (C.2.d) BP
[-90] [5. Reference material due (C.1.e; C.3.c; Attachment 3)] AlA
{-75} 6. Integrated examination outIine(s) due, Including Forms E8-201-2, ES-201-3, ES-301-1, ES-301-2, ES-301-5, ES-D-1's, ES-401-1/2, ES-401-3, and ES-401-4, as applicable (C.1.e and f; C.3.d) /Jf
{-70} (7. Examination outline(s) reviewed by NRC and feedback provided to facility licensee (C.2.h: C.3.e)} .eP
{-45} 8. Proposed examinations (including written, walk-through JPMs, and scenarios, as applicable), supporting documentation (including Forms ES-301-3, ES-301-4, ES-301-5, ES-301-6, and ES-401-6, and any Form ES-201-3 updates), and reference materials due (C.1.e, t, g and h; C.3.d) 6P
-30 9. Preliminary license applications (NRC Form 398's) due (C.1.1; C.2.g; ES-202) f1?
-14 10. Final license applications due and Form ES-201-4 prepared (C.1.1; C.2.1; ES-202) eP
-14 11. Examination approved by NRC supervisor for facility licensee review (C.2.h; C.3.f) (3~
-14 12. Examinations reviewed with facility licensee (C.1.j; C.2.f and h; C.3.g) <<
-7 13. Written examinations and operating tests approved by NRC supervisor (C.2.!; C.3.h) (f
-7 14. Final applications reviewed; 1 or 2 (if >10) applications audited to confirm qualifications I eligibility; and examination approval and waiver letters sent ff (C.2.i; Attachment 5; ES-202, C.2.a; ES-204)
-7 15. Proctoring/written exam administration guidelines reviewed with facility licensee (C.3.k) 6(/
-7 16. Approved scenarios, job performance measures, and questions distributed to NRC examiners (C.3.!) (3{J
- Target dates are generally based on facility-prepared examinations and are keyed to the examination date Identified in the corporate notification letter. They are for planning purposes and may be adjusted on a case-by case basis in coordination with the facility licensee.
[Applies only] {Does not apply} to examinations prepared by the NRC.
ES-201, Page 25 of 28
<t ES*201 Examination Security Agreement Form ES*201*3
- 1. Pre-Examination I acknowledge that I have acquired specialized knowledge about the NRC licensing examinations scheduled for the week(s) of It-/Zo (I I as of the date of my signature. I agree that I will not knowingly divulge any information about these examinations to any persons who have not been authorized by the NRC chief examiner. I understand that I am not to instruct, evaluate, or provide performance feedback to those applicants scheduled to be administered these licensing examinations from this date until completion of examination administration, except as specifically noted below and authorized by the NRC (e.g., acting as a simulator booth operator or communicator is acceptable if the individual does not select the training content or provide direct or indirect feedback). Furthermore, I am aware of the physical security measures and requirements (as documented in the facility licensee's procedures) and understand that violation of the conditions of this agreement may result in cancellation of the examinations and/or an enforcement action against me or the facility licensee. I will immediately report to facility management or the NRC chief examiner any indications or suggestions that examination security may have been compromised.
- 2. Post*Examination To the best of my knowle ge I did not divulge to any unauthorized persons any information concerning the NRC licensing examinations administered during the week(s) of 10 II . From the date that I entered into this security agreement until the completion of examination administration, I did not instruct, evaluate, or provide performance feedback to those applicants who were administered these licensing examinations, except as specifically noted below and authorized by the NRC.
PRINTED NAME JOB TITLE I RESPONSIBILITY DATE DATE NOTE
£~ k~f'll- II !JIl)..
- l. p-) {,,{1.o.l (l l"fi../Jo.O 7 -'?(~
Si 11'\"'- I ,,-+be CO" rd l\c...k- 7-'5'11 ~
I.-DI-r ..(',.,) 'I "ji'hC...f2) A. "1-'l1.' II
, 4. tO~ I '1.. ./1-/1 A1
~ ~ %-~'~4t
~"""vt<:.-::f;,.- @:'r-S.A-) -If
$-f,s-I/
- 1-:J:JLdJIf
~~
. . N'SO I \It\:t.\P&mA.. :3-~" ~H~.. fl. NA.
I VlOC.....-l IV"" ~ ... " ,ySo I ,,"':Itcl.,..*h... 3#l'-" 9-9-'/ ~
'~ ~2j.-....l s?o ,I tlA-LtlJ..+m2." 1--k.fA I "1-n-/1 sao/ V4.1:..L. hv- 7lIilii~
'~l')..
z../~V't'lK.
- t:r*
I-c 11,.,/1,
~
lJ.iJ.1lL.
rtf ~ ~
'C~~~ =!~¥ 1:; ~~ _ ;rt:M ~~
ES-201, Page 27 of 28 'Rl4~Miri AUG 1 6,iI\11
ES-201 Examination Security Agreement Form ES-201-3
- 1. Pre-Examination I acknowledge that I have acquired specialized knowledge about the NRC licensing examinations scheduled for the week(s) of t.e/:lO/1l as of the date of my signature. I agree that I will not knowingly divulge any information about these examinations to any persons who have not been authorized by the NRC chief examiner. I understand that I am not to instruct, evaluate, or provide performance feedback to those applicants scheduled to be administered these licensing examinations from this date until completion of examination administration, except as specifically noted below and authorized by the NRC (e.g., acting as a simulator booth operator or communicator is acceptable if the individual does not select the training content or provide direct or indirect feedback). Furthermore, I am aware of the physical security measures and requirements (as documented in the facility licensee's procedures) and understand that violation of the conditions of this agreement may result in cancellation of the examinations andlor an enforcement action against me or the facility licensee. I will immediately report to facility management or the NRC chief examiner any indications or suggestions that examination security may have been compromised.
- 2. Post-Examination To the best of my knowle ge, I did not divulge to any unauthorized persons any information concerning the NRC licensing examinations administered during the week(s) of () II . From the date that I entered into this security agreement until the completion of examination administration, I did not instruct, evaluate, or provide performance feedback to those applicants who were administered these licensing examinations, except as specifically noted below and authorized by the NRC.
JOB TITLE I RESPONSIBILITY SIGNATURE (1) 1 DATE DATE NOTE Ofllt-JI1DtVVI-tcr' . ~~ & ?-Cf~-
. \ ......... ' F!:"'" ,-.-
- SRo ~-3H' 7- ~ (__
- - - A - R0 5'!?'/11 ~__
orr:)'J; C *./tl(>l("rn ::;~ ~' . __
50 ~II'~ 7/,s _1_
~ &0 Ns.o . -/ Uld
~
~ ~~==
- Ei.
.. I .( '1..
t{
I~T ;n~t,"d.1'
- kkr C;)O}v(,
1i.."-14HrU~-nr
~
G) I V.....z~11 7-(-11 _ _
~ __
._-- . . =rr!t
.""$A:rr /feJ I ~ ff1 U,u;;rJiY
,e-r IN'$r. '// -
1!..illJ__
- ~i:r:t:A;~J;.;
ES-201, Page 27 of 28
ES-401 Record of Rejected KlAs Form ES-401-4 Tier I Randomly Reason for Rejection Group Selected KIA 111 oo0056AK3.01 Unable to create RO level question that properly discriminates. Replaced (0. #12) with systematically selected KIA 000056K3.02 with same APE and category to keep outline balanced. Updated ES-401-2.
211 008oo0A3.04 Randomly selected KIA is from subject (Component Cooling system (0. #38) automatic actions) that is being over sampled on the exam. (was already sampled on cert exam and previously on NRC exam quest #36) Rejected KIA based upon over sampling of this area. Replaced with systematically selected KIA 012oo0A3.04 from different system but same stem statement (A3.04) to keep outline balanced. Updated ES-401-2.
211 022000 2.4.50 Unable to create RO level question that properly discriminates. Replaced (0. #45) with systematically selected KIA 059000 2.4.50 with same generic KIA and different system to keep outline balanced. Updated ES-401-2.
1/1 000057AA2.11 Randomly selected KIA (loss of AC instrument bus effect on main feed (0.79) pump indications) is not relevent at Braidwood. All main feed pump instrumentation at Braidwood are DC power supplied and are unaffected by a loss of AC instrument bus. Replaced with systematically selected KIA 000011 A2.08 from different system but stem statement from same category (A2) to keep outline balanced. Updated ES-401-2.
1/1 000065 2.4.20 Randomly selected KIA (Knowledge of operational implications of EOP (0.80) warnings, cautions and notes regarding a loss of instrument air is not relevent at Braidwood. No EOPs contain warnings, cautions or notes related to that subject. Replaced with systematically selected KIA 000065 2.4.8 with same APE and category to keep outline balanced. Updated ES 401-2.
1/2 000076AA2.06 Unable to create SRO level question from randomly selected KIA (0.85) (response of PZR LCS to changes in letdown flow rate related to a high RCS activity event). Replaced with systematically selected KIA 000076AA2.02 with same APE and category to keep outline balanced.
Updated ES-401-2.
211 010oo0A2.01 Unable to create SRO level question from randomly selected KIA.
(0.87) Additionally. PZR heater. operation has already been sampled twice on exam (0. #7 & 37) Replaced with systematically selected KIA 010oo0A2.02 with same system and category to keep outline balanced.
Updated ES-401-2.
212 072000A2.03 Unable to create SRO level question from randomly selected KIA.
(0.93) Additionally. Area rad monitors interlocks/loss of power been sampled twice on audit exam (0. #4 & 41) and once on NRC exam (0. #61). Also the SRO randomly generated outline for tier 2 originally selected (5) A2 KlAs and only (3) GeneriC KlAs. Replaced with systematically selected KIA 072000 2.4.11 with same system but in generic category to better balance outline. Updated ES-401-2.
3/4 2.4.21 Randomly selected KIA (knowledge of status and logic to assess safety (0.99) function) concept was already tested on SRO exam (0. #84). Replaced with systematically selected KIA 2.4.16 s in same tier and category to keep outline balanced. Updated ES-401-2.
1/2 000069K2.03 Unable to create RO level question that properly discriminates. Replaced (0.22) with systematically selected KIA 000003K2.05 from APE not previously sampled and same category (K2) to keep outline balanced. Updated ES 401-2.
ES-401. Page 27 of 33
ES-403 Written Examination Grading Form ES-403-1 Quality Checklist Facili : Braidwood Date of Exam: July 1, 2011 Exam Level: R Initials Item Descri tion 1.
- 2. Answer key changes and question deletions justified and documented
- 3. Applicants' scores checked for addition errors reviewers s ot check> 25% of examinations
- 4. Grading for all borderline cases (80 +/-2% overall and 70 or 80, as a licable, +/-4% on the SRO-onl reviewed in detail
- 5. All other failing examinations checked to ensure that grades are 'ustified
- 6. Performance on missed questions checked for training deficiencies and wording problems; evaluate validity of uestions missed b half or more of the a licants Printed Name/Signature Date
- a. Grader 1.. 11.-\\
- b. Facility Reviewer(*) 1/26/" ,
- c. NRC Chief Examiner (*) ~/a.~111
- d. NRC Supervisor (*) .,/lfi/I,
(*) The facility reviewer's signature is not applicable for examinations graded by the t'JRC; two inde endent NRC reviews are re uired.
ES-403, Page 6 of 6
ES-401 Written Examination Review Worksheet Form ES-401-9
- 1. 2. 3. Psychometric Flaws 4. Job Content Flaws 5. Other 6. 7. 8.
Q# LOK LOO (FtH) (1-5) Stem Cues TtF Credo Partial Job- Minutia #1 Back Q= SRO B/MIN UlEtS Explanation Focus Oist. Link units ward KIA Only 1 H 3 Y N S 2 L 4 X Y N Y Oistracter B. could be correct because step F.3.3 assumes a cooldown temperature. Oistracter "0" could be correct because the procedure assumes core xenon is zero.
S RESOLUTION: Oistracters changed 3" H 2 Y B S LOO marginal retained because it is a bank question RESOLUTION: Replaced with new question 4 H 4 Y N S 5 H 3 Y N S 6" H 3 Y B S 7 H 2 Y N S Instructions
[Refer to Section 0 of ES-401 and Appendix B for additional information regarding each of the following concepts.)
- 1. Enter the level of knowledge (LOK) of each question as either (F)undamental or (H)igher cognitive level.
- 2. Enter the level of difficulty (LOO) of each question using a 1 - 5 (easy difficult) rating scale (questions in the 2 - 4 range are acceptable).
- 3. Check the appropriate box if a psychometric flaw is identified:
The stem lacks sufficient focus to elicit the correct answer (e.g., unclear intent, more information is needed, or too much needless information).
The stem or distractors contain cues (i.e., clues, specific determiners, phrasing, length, etc).
The answer chOices are a collection of unrelated truelfalse statements.
The distractors are not credible; Single implausible distractors should be repaired. more than one is unacceptable.
One or more distractors is (are) partially correct (e.g.* if the applicant can make unstated assumptions'- that are not contradicted by stem).
- 4. Check the appropriate box if a job content error is identified:
- The question is not linked to the job requirements (i.e., the question has a valid KIA but. as written, is not operational in content).
The question requires the recall of knowledge that is too speCific for the closed reference test mode (I.e., it is not required to be known from memory).
- The question contains data with an unrealistic level of accuracy or inconsistent units (e.g., panel meter in percent with question in gallons).
The question requires reverse logic or application compared to the job requirements.
- 5. Check questions that are sampled for conformance with the approved KIA and those that are deSignated SRO-onfy (KIA and license level mismatches are unacceptable).
- 6. Enter question source: (B)ank, (M)odified, or (N)ew. Check that (M)odified questions meet criteria of ES-401 Section 0.2.1.
- 7. Based on the reviewer's judgment, is the question as written (U)nsatisfactory (requiring repair or replacement), in need of {E)ditorial enhancement, or (S)atisfactory?
- 8. At a minimum, explain any "U' ratings (e.g., how the Appendix B psychometric attributes are not being met).
" 30 Questions review
- 1. 2. 3. Psychometric Flaws 4. Job Content Flaws 5. Other 6. 7. 8.
Q# LOK LOD (F/H) (1-5) Stem Cues TlF Credo Partial Job- Minutia #1 Back- Q= SRO BIMIN UtE/S Explanation Focus Dist. Link units ward KIA Only 8 H 3 Y B S 9* H 3 Y N S 10 H 4 Y N S 11 L 2 N N Y The KA is focused on the length of time batteries will be available after a Station Blackout, operators should have an idea. of how long they have until important equipment is lost.
S RESOLUTION: Replaced with bank question related to station black out.
12* H 3 Y N S 13 H 3 Y N S 14 L 3 Y N S 15* L 2 Y N S 16 H 3 Y M S 17 H 3 Y M S 18* H 3 Y B S 19 H 3 Y M S 20 H 4 Y N S 21* L 2 Y B S 22 H 3 Y B S 23 H 3 Y N S 24* L 2 Y N S 25 L 2 Y N S 26 H 3 Y N S 27* L 3 Y N S
ES-401 2 Form ES-401*9
- 1. 2. 3. Psychometric Flaws 4. Job Content Flaws 5. Other 6. 7. 8.
Q# LOK LOD (FIH) (1-5) Stem Cues T/F Cred. Partial Job- Minutia #1 Back- Q= SRO BIMIN UlE/S Explanation Focus Dist. Link units ward KIA Only 28 L 3 Y N E Change wording from " ... Switch fails at 500psig, ... " to " ... Switch fails providing a continuous 500 psig Signal, ... "
RESOLUTION: done 29 H 4 Y N S 30* H 3 Y N E Provide a picture of the 1PK-131 controller, set as called for in the stem to make the question more operationally valid.
RESOLUTION: done 31 H 3 Y N S 32 L 3 Y N S 33" H 3 Y N S 34 H 3 Y N S 35 H 2 Y B S 36* H 3 Y N S 37 H 3 Y N S 38 L 3 Y B S 39" L 3 Y B S 40 H 2 Y B S 41 L 4 Y N S 42" H 3 Y N S 43 L 3 Y N S 44 L 3 Y N S 45* L 2 Y N S
- 1. 2. 3. Psychometric Flaws 4. Job Content Flaws 5. Other 6. 7. 8.
Q# LOK LOD (F/H) (1-5) Stem Cues T/F Credo Partial Job- Minutia #1 Back* Q= SRO BIMIN UlEtS Explanation Focus Dist. Link units ward KIA Only 46 L 3 Y H E Quantify the feedwater increase such as * -A rapid 0.2 Mlbslhr.
increase in feedwater is made.. ."
RESOLUTION: done 47 L 3 Y L S
ES-401 2 Form ES*401*9
-_. --- ~~--.- --_.
- 1. 2. 3. Psychometric Flaws 4. Job Content Flaws 5. Other 6. 7. 8.
Q# LOK LOO (F/H) (1-5) Stem Cues TIF Credo Partial Job- Minutia #1 Back- Q= SRO BIM/N UIEIS Explanation Focus Oist. Link units ward KIA Only 48* H 3 Y N S 49 H 3 Y B S 50 L 3 Y N S 51* L 3 Y N S 52 L 3 X Y N Y Seems like SX is needed for any OG run therefore B&C not credible.
How about a Temperature signal, and a Any Start signal.
S RESOLUTION: distracters Band C changed 53 L 3 Y N S 54* L 4 Y N S 55 H 5 Y B S 56 H 4 Y N S 57* H 3 Y N S 58 H 4 X Y N Y Why can we expect operator to know the BANK 0 insertion limits without looking it up in the tech speC/COLR? Should the Fig. 2.5.1 S
be provided or Bank 0 be inserted even more say to 20 steps?
RESOLUTION: BANK 0 insertion limits have not changed for the life of the plant therefore, all operator are expected to know them, question ok as is.
59 L 2 Y N S Remove "is' from line 2 of stem RESOLUTION: done 60* L 3 Y N S 61 L 3 X Y N Y Must an RO know that the overhead crane is used to transfer new fuel to the pool?
RESOLUTION: KA rejected question replaced S
62 H 3 Y B S 63* H 2 Y N S
- 1. 2. 3. Psychometric Flaws 4. Job Content Flaws 5. Other 6. 7. 8.
Q# LOK LOD (F/H) (1-5)
Stem,lcuesl T/F I cred*lpartial JOb-JMinutia\ #1 JS8ck Q= ISRO SlMfN UtEtS Explanation Focus Dist.
~~~
Link units ward KIA Only 164 I 65 1I
- L H 3 4
I tj I j ! t=1 tj:1 S I I I N
S S
- 1. 2. 3. Psychometric Flaws 4. Job Content Flaws 5. Other 6. 7. 8.
Q# LOK LOD (F/H) (1-5) Stem Cues T/F Credo Partial Job ~i:j_#1 Back- Q= SRO BtMIN UtE/S Explanation Focus Dist. Link units ward KIA Only 66* L 2 X Y N Y All answers except the correct one starts with "wait" when answering how to address immediate actions.
RESOLUTION: distracters edited to remove the starting "waif S
67 L 3 X X Y N WE Change distracter "A" no one will choose an answer that says "NO supervisor evaluation is required". Also change "0" to "can be completed using the superseded (old) revision following evaluation that old revision can be completed as written."
S RESOLUTION: distracters revised 68 H 4 Y N S 69* L 3 Y N S 70 H 3 Y B S 71 H 4 Y N S 72* H 3 Y B S 73 L 3 Y N S 74 L 3 Y B S 75* L 4 Y B S 76 H 3 Y B S 77 H 4 Y N S 78* H 3 Y B S 79 H 3 Y B S 80 H 3 Y N S 81* L 3 Y B S 82 H 3 Y M S
- 1. 2. 3. Psychometric Flaws 4. Job Content Flaws 5. Other 6. 7. 8.
01 LOK (F/H)
LOD (1-5) Stem Cues T/F Focus Dist. Link
~
1J Credo Partial JOb-1 Minutia #1 Back-units ward Q= JSRO BIMIN U/EIS KIA Only Explanation L 2 N S 1:*1 1 I I I I I I I I I I : I I I I H 3 N S I
- 1. 2. 3. Psychometric Flaws 4. Job Content Flaws 5. Other 6. 7. 8.
Q# LOK LOD (FIH) (1-5) 8tem Cues TIF Credo Partial Job- Minutia #/ Back- Q= SRO B/M/N UlEiS Explanation Focus Dist. Link units ward KIA Only 85 L 3 Y N S 86 H 3 Y N 8 87* H 3 Y B 8 88 H 3 Y N S 89 H 3 Y X N Y Not SRO level to answer question all one needs to know is that with the reactor at 25% power and no running feed pumps running the reactor should be tripped RO knowledge.
S RESOLUTION: Question replaced 90* H 3 Y N S 91 L 3 N X N Y Knowing that at .5 pSig containment pressure the mini-purge supply will back flow is RO knowledge level. Also the correct answer does not explain ~ there is a high pressure limit.
S RESOLUTION: Question replaced 92 L 3 Y N S 93* H 3 Y M S 94 L 3 Y M S 95 L 2 Y N S 96* L 5 X N N Y Cannot expect SROs to know this level of detail from memory. Also this is not a change process question.
RESOLUTION: Question replaced S
97 L 3 Y B S 98 L 3 Y M S 99* H 3 Y B S 100 H 3 Y B S
- 1. 2. 3. Psychometric Flaws 4. Job Content Flaws 5. Other 6. 7. 8.
Q# LOK LOD (FfH) (1-5) Stem Cues TtF Credo Partial JOb-IMinutia #1 Jsack- Q= SRO SIM/N UlE/S Explanation Focus Dist. Link units ward KIA Only I I I
Braidwood 2011 License Examination Outline Comments
- 1) Scenario 11-1 needs another IIC Event or the A TC SRO-I candidate will not have 2 IIC events while ATC this could result in there not being enough actions to grade panel operation. (see ES -301-5 for SRO-I, ATC 11-1/SRO 11-3/SRO 11-5) Some candidates were examined in 3 scenarios all candidates had at least the minimum number of required events.
- 2) JPM "h. Swap cc Pumps", and Scenario 11-5 event 4 would have similar actions replace one of them. JPM h changed to "Respond to Rep Thermal Barrier Leak"
- 3) For modified JPMs please supply the unmodified JPM when the full examination is submitted for review. The unmodified JPMs were reviewed during the validation week.
BRAIDWOOD 2011 OPERATING TEST COMMENTS I RESOLUTIONS Comment: JPM R300 appears to be a system rather than a admin JPM.
Resolutions: JPM replaced.
Comment: JPMs SIM-222 and SIM-400 are very similar to "IPMs used on the 2007 Braid wood Exam.
Resolutions: These JPMs will be considered to have been use on previous exam. However because they were randomly selected and are the only 2 ..IPMs from a previous exam they do not need to be replaced.
Comment: "IPM R-204 change JPM to direct applicant to determine isolation pOints rather than to review a marked up drawing.
Resolutions: "IPM changed as recommended.
Comment: Make 2 versions of Scenario 11-3 one for crews that will be tested in 2 scenarios and a shorter one for crews tested in three scenarios.
Resolutions: Two versions made 11-3a and 11-3b.
Exelon Generation Company, LLC www.exeloncorp.com Exelon Braidwood Station Nuclear 35100 South Route 53, Suite 84 Braceville, IL 60407-9619 July 26. 2011 NUREG 1021. Revision 9 BW110081 Supplement 1 U, S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Regional Administrator. Region III 2443 Warrenville Road, Suite 210 Lisle1 IL 60532-4352 Braidwood Station. Units 1 and 2 Facility Operating License Nos. NPF-72 and NPF-77 NRC Docket Nos. STN 50-456 and STN 50-457
Subject:
2011 Initial License Examination Post Examination The Braidwood Station 2011 Operator Initial Licensing Examination was administered on July 1. 2011. In accordance with NUREG-1021 , "Operator Licensing Examination Standards for Power Reactors," Revision 9, Supplement 1, Section ES-402, "Administering Initial Written Examinations." the facility licensee should submit formal comments within five working days after the examination is administered. The purpose of this letter is to notify the NRC that Braidwood Station does not challenge the test results and declines to provide post examination comments.
Should you have any questions concerning this letter, please contact Mr. Chris VanDenburgh, Regulatory Assurance Manager, at (815) 417-2800. For questions concerning administration of the examination, please contact Brian Kempen at (815) 458-7860.
~~~
Daniel J. Enright Site Vice President Braidwood Station cc: Chief. NRC Operator licenSing Branch NRC Senior Resident Inspector - Braidwood Station 4u. 'eX V(~ tJ t JUl 2 7 2011