ML11307A288
| ML11307A288 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Seabrook  |
| Issue date: | 10/28/2011 |
| From: | Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation |
| To: | |
| References | |
| Download: ML11307A288 (3) | |
Text
1 SeabrookNPEm Resource From:
Plasse, Richard Sent:
Friday, October 28, 2011 12:26 PM To:
Cliche, Richard
Subject:
FW: Follow up RA B 2 1 30-2.docx Attachments:
Follow up RA B 2 1 30-2.docx Draft RAI From: Auluck, Rajender Sent: Friday, October 28, 2011 12:09 PM To: Plasse, Richard Cc: Morey, Dennis
Subject:
Follow up RA B 2 1 30-2.docx
- Rich, See the attached follow-up RAI.
Raj
Hearing Identifier:
Seabrook_License_Renewal_NonPublic Email Number:
2328 Mail Envelope Properties (Richard.Plasse@nrc.gov20111028122500)
Subject:
FW: Follow up RA B 2 1 30-2.docx Sent Date:
10/28/2011 12:25:39 PM Received Date:
10/28/2011 12:25:00 PM From:
Plasse, Richard Created By:
Richard.Plasse@nrc.gov Recipients:
"Cliche, Richard" <Richard.Cliche@fpl.com>
Tracking Status: None Post Office:
Files Size Date & Time MESSAGE 224 10/28/2011 12:25:00 PM Follow up RA B 2 1 30-2.docx 21510 Options Priority:
Standard Return Notification:
No Reply Requested:
No Sensitivity:
Normal Expiration Date:
Recipients Received:
Request for Additional Information Follow-up RAI B.2.1.30-2
=
Background===
In response to RAI B.2.1.30-2, the applicant stated that the personnel performing the visual examination of concrete surfaces prior to Integrated Leak Rate Test are not qualified in accordance with IWA-2300. There is no requirement in 10 CFR 50.55a that Appendix J general visual inspection personnel be qualified per IWA-2300. The application further stated that is a general inspection of the containment surface for any apparent degradation that would cause failure of the Integrated Leak Rate Test.
Issue The applicant in its response did not provide any information about the qualification of the personnel performing the visual examination. In addition, the response did not provide any specific quantitative acceptance criteria for inspection acceptance criteria for inspection of the containment interior and exterior surfaces. In addition, the staff reviewed the applicants complex procedure as well as procedure EX1803.004, Containment and Containment Enclosure Surface Inspection, and did not find information about the qualification of the personnel or any quantitative acceptance criteria that will define severe cracks, spalling, popouts, surface voids, or other irregularities.
Request Please provide information about the qualification of the personnel performing the general visual inspection of the accessible interior and exterior surfaces of the containment system for structural deterioration which may affect the containment leak-tight integrity conducted prior to each Type A test, and at a periodic interval between the Type A tests. In addition, provide the acceptance criteria used for these inspections.