ML11291A171

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Order (Clarification for Evidentiary Filings)
ML11291A171
Person / Time
Site: Indian Point  Entergy icon.png
Issue date: 10/18/2011
From: Lawrence Mcdade
Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Panel
To:
SECY RAS
References
RAS 21261, 50-247-LR, 50-286-LR, ASLBP 07-858-03-LR-BD01
Download: ML11291A171 (6)


Text

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION ATOMIC SAFETY AND LICENSING BOARD Before Administrative Judges:

Lawrence G. McDade, Chairman Dr. Kaye D. Lathrop Dr. Richard E. Wardwell In the Matter of Docket Nos. 50-247-LR and 50-286-LR ENTERGY NUCLEAR OPERATIONS, INC. ASLBP No. 07-858-03-LR-BD01 (Indian Point Nuclear Generating Units 2 and 3) October 18, 2011 ORDER (Clarification of Procedures for Evidentiary Filings)

The State of New York (New York) has moved unopposed for clarification of our October 7, 2011 Order regarding the procedures for evidentiary filings.1 Our July 1, 2010 Scheduling Order provides that the evidentiary filings of the Intervenors, the Applicant, the NRC Staff, and interested governmental entities who have been authorized to participate in this proceeding pursuant to 10 C.F.R. § 2.315(c) be structured contention-by-contention.2 Our October 7, 2011 Order directs that 1

State of New Yorks Motion for Clarification (Boards October 7, 2011 Order (Procedures for Evidentiary Filings)) (Oct. 17, 2011) [hereinafter New York Motion].

2 Licensing Board Scheduling Order (July 1, 2010) at 13-15 (unpublished). For example,

[T]he intervenors shall file their initial written statement of position, written testimony with supporting affidavits, and exhibits, on a contention-by-contention basis, pursuant to 10 C.F.R. § 2.1207(a)(1). The initial written statement should be in the nature of a trial brief that provides a precise road map of the partys case, setting out affirmative arguments and applicable legal standards, identifying witnesses and evidence, and specifying the purpose of witnesses and evidence (i.e., stating with particularity how the witness, exhibit, or evidence supports a factual or legal position). The written testimony shall be under oath or by an affidavit so that it is suitable for direct receipt into evidence, in accordance with 10 C.F.R. § 2.1207(b)(2). The exhibits shall include all documents that the party or its witnesses refer to, use, or rely upon for their statements or position. If

Each participants evidentiary submission shall begin with an exhibit list containing four columns: the exhibits number, the contention(s) addressed by the exhibit, the exhibits name (including date of creation, if useful), and the exhibits submission date. That exhibit list will constitute each respective participants first exhibit. Each participants second exhibit will consist of its statement of position and the third exhibit will be the pre-filed testimony (which, at the participants option, may be broken into more than one exhibit). This will be followed in numerical order by each of the exhibits supporting that testimony.3 New York asserts that our October 7, 2011 Order could be read as anticipating one single omnibus submission from each party commencing with a single exhibit list followed by one combined statement of position for all contentions, to be followed by testimony on all contentions, to be followed by exhibits on all contentions or that, in the alternative, that Order could be interpreted as leaving our July 1, 2010 Scheduling Orders contention-by-contention regime in place.4 New York requests that we leave our July 1, 2010 regime undisturbed.5 Our October 7, 2011 Order should not be interpreted as departing from our July 1, 2010 Scheduling Orders contention-by-contention scheme. Rather, our October 7, 2011 Order only instructs the participants in identifying and numbering their exhibits. Participants filings for each contention and each consolidated contention shall entail a separate statement of position and separate testimony, and those documents may be submitted in separate files. Each party shall submit only one exhibit list per round of evidentiary filings, and that exhibit list shall be arranged contention-by-contention. After the filings for the first contention are included in a participants exhibit list, that same exhibit list shall continue contention-by-contention in the same format, with such documents are not attached, the Board will not consider them for any purpose in making findings of fact. Such submissions shall be made on a contention-by-contention basis.

Id. at 13-14.

3 Licensing Board Order (Procedures for Evidentiary Filings) (Oct. 7, 2011) at 1-2 (unpublished).

4 New York Motion at 1-2.

5 Id. at 2.

the statement of position and direct testimony for each successive contention followed directly by any newly identified exhibits referenced therein.

It is so ORDERED.

FOR THE ATOMIC SAFETY AND LICENSING BOARD6

/RA/

Lawrence G. McDade, Chairman ADMINISTRATIVE JUDGE Rockville, Maryland October 18, 2011 6

Copies of this Order were sent this date by the agencys E-Filing system to: (1) Counsel for the NRC Staff; (2) Counsel for Entergy; (3) Counsel for the State of New York; (4) Counsel for Riverkeeper, Inc.; (5) Manna Jo Green, the Representative for Clearwater; (6) Counsel for the State of Connecticut; (7) Counsel for Westchester County; (8) Counsel for the Town of Cortlandt; (9) Mayor Sean Murray, the Representative for the Village of Buchanan; and (10) Michael J. Delaney, counsel for the City of New York.

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION In the Matter of )

)

ENTERGY NUCLEAR OPERATIONS, INC. ) Docket Nos. 50-247-LR

) and 50-286-LR (Indian Point Nuclear Generating Station, )

Units 2 and 3) )

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I hereby certify that copies of the foregoing ORDER (Clarification of Procedures for Evidentiary Filings) have been served upon the following persons by Electronic Information Exchange.

Office of Commission Appellate Adjudication U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Mail Stop O-7H4M Office of the Secretary of the Commission U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Mail Stop O-16C1 Washington, DC 20555-0001 Washington, DC 20555-0001 E-mail: ocaamail@nrc.gov Hearing Docket E-mail: hearingdocket@nrc.gov U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Sherwin E. Turk, Esq.

Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Panel Edward L. Williamson, Esq.

Mail Stop T-3F23 Beth N. Mizuno, Esq.

Washington, DC 20555-0001 David E. Roth, Esq.

Brian Harris, Esq.

Lawrence G. McDade, Chair Andrea Z. Jones, Esq.

Administrative Judge Mary B. Spencer, Esq.

E-mail: lawrence.mcdade@nrc.gov Karl Farrar, Esq.

Brian Newell, Paralegal Richard E. Wardwell U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Administrative Judge Office of the General Counsel E-mail: richard.wardwell@nrc.gov Mail Stop O-15D21 Washington, DC 20555-0001 Kaye D. Lathrop E-mail:

Administrative Judge sherwin.turk@nrc.gov 190 Cedar Lane E. edward.williamson@nrc.gov Ridgway, CO 81432 beth.mizuno@nrc.gov E-mail: kaye.lathrop@nrc.gov brian.harris.@nrc.gov david.roth@nrc.gov Joshua A. Kirstein, Law Clerk andrea.jones@nrc.gov E-mail: josh.kirstein@nrc.gov mary.spencer@nrc.gov Anne Siarnacki, Law Clerk karl.farrar@nrc.gov E-mail: anne.siarnacki@nrc.gov brian.newell@nrc.gov OGC Mail Center OGCMailCenter@nrc.gov

Docket Nos. 50-247-LR and 50-286-LR ORDER (Clarification of Procedures for Evidentiary Filings)

William C. Dennis, Esq. Thomas F. Wood, Esq.

Assistant General Counsel Daniel Riesel, Esq.

Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc. Victoria Shiah, Esq.

440 Hamilton Avenue Counsel for Town of Cortlandt White Plains, NY 10601 Sive, Paget & Riesel, P.C.

Email: wdennis@entergy.com 460 Park Avenue New York, NY 10022 E-mail: driesel@sprlaw.com vshiah@sprlaw.com Elise N. Zoli, Esq. Phillip Musegaas, Esq.

Goodwin Proctor, LLP Deborah Brancato, Esq.

Exchange Place Riverkeeper, Inc.

53 State Street 20 Secor Road Boston, MA 02109 Ossining, NY 10562 E-mail: ezoli@goodwinprocter.com E-mail: phillip@riverkeeper.org dbrancato@riverkeeper.org Kathryn M. Sutton, Esq. Melissa-Jean Rotini, Esq.

Paul M. Bessette, Esq. Assistant County Attorney Martin J. ONeill, Esq. Office of Robert F. Meehan, Raphael Kuyler, Esq. Westchester County Attorney Jonathan M. Rund, Esq. 148 Martine Avenue, 6th Floor Counsel for Entergy Nuclear Operation, Inc White Plains, NY 10601 Lena Michelle Long E-mail: MJR1@westchestergov.com Mary Freeze Morgan, Lewis & Bockius, LLP 1111 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW Washington, DC 20004 E-mail: ksutton@morganlewis.com pbessette@morganlewis.com martin.oneill@morganlewis.com rkuyler@morganlewis.com jrund@morganlewis.com llong@morganlewis.com mfreeze@morganlewis.com Michael J. Delaney, Esq. Manna Jo Greene, Environmental Director Director, Energy Regulatory Affairs Steven C. Filler NYC Department of Environmental Protection Karla Raimundi 59-17 Junction Boulevard Hudson River Sloop Clearwater, Inc.

Flushing, NY 11373 724 Wolcott Ave.

E-mail: mdelaney@dep.nyc.gov Beacon, NY 12508 E-mail: mannajo@clearwater.org stephenfiller@gmail.com 2

Docket Nos. 50-247-LR and 50-286-LR ORDER (Clarification of Procedures for Evidentiary Filings) karla@clearwater.org Joan Leary Matthews, Esq. Robert D. Snook, Esq.

Senior Attorney for Special Projects Assistant Attorney General New York State Department Office of the Attorney General of Environmental Conservation State of Connecticut 625 Broadway, 14th Floor 55 Elm Street Albany, New York 12233-5500 P.O. Box 120 E-mail: jmatthe@gw.dec.state.ny.us Hartford, CT 06141-0120 E-mail: robert.snook@po.state.ct.us John Louis Parker, Esq. Sean Murray, Mayor Office of General Counsel, Region 3 Kevin Hay, Village Administrator New York State Department Village of Buchanan of Environmental Conservation Municipal Building 21 South Putt Corners Road 236 Tate Avenue New Paltz, NY 12561-1620 Buchanan, NY 10511-1298 E-mail: jlparker@gw.dec.state.ny.us E-mail: SMurray@villageofbuchanan.com Administrator@villageofbuchanan.com John J. Sipos, Esq.

Charles Donaldson, Esq.

Assistant Attorneys General Office of the Attorney General of the State of New York The Capitol State Street Albany, New York 12224 E-mail: John.Sipos@ag.ny.gov charlie.donaldson@ag.ny.gov Janice A. Dean, Esq.

Assistant Attorney General Office of the Attorney General of the State of New York 120 Broadway, 26th Floor New York, New York 10271 E-mail: Janice.Dean@ag.ny.gov

[Original signed by Christine M. Pierpoint]

Office of the Secretary of the Commission Dated at Rockville, Maryland this 18th day of October 2011 3