ML11263A045
| ML11263A045 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Salem, Hope Creek  |
| Issue date: | 10/25/2010 |
| From: | Bo Pham Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation |
| To: | Logan D Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation |
| References | |
| FOIA/PA-2011-0113 | |
| Download: ML11263A045 (2) | |
Text
4-Pham, Bo From:
Pham, Bo Sent:
Monday, October 25, 2010 1:53 PM To:
Logan, Dennis; Imboden, Andy Cc:
Perkins, Leslie
Subject:
RE: BA and EFH for Salem and HC Andy & Dennis, FYI, now that the DSEIS for Salem & HC has been issued, I plan to send letters to the FWS & and NMFS people to ask for their comments on the DSEIS. In the same letter, I will also say that the BA & EFH will be forthcoming under the separate process for consultation under Section 7 of the ESA and Magnuson Stevens Act. Then we'll follow-up with a phone call to them to explain how the BA & EFH and that consultation process might run beyond the timeline of taking action for license renewal/
Sound good with you guys? Also, who can finish up the BA & EFH for us now that AECOM's no longer viable?
Thanks.
Bo Pham Chief, Projects Branch 1 Division of License Renewal Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission 301-415-8450 Original Message -----
From: Logan, Dennis Sent: Thursday, October 14, 2010 2:11 PM To: Pham, Bo
Subject:
RE: BA and EFH for Salem and HC Bo, Regarding the scheduling perspective, I do not really know. In the past, as I read the rules, I would say we cannot issue a license without finishing. But in practice, the schedule of the SEIS is frequently independent of the schedules of the EFH and the Section 7 consultations, the license is granted before the EFH and ESA consultations are compete, and everybody seems happy with that. We have had to explain that informally to NMFS and FWS staff a couple of times, but they have not objected.
Dennis Original Message -----
From: Pham, Bo Sent: Thursday, October 14, 2010 11:45 AM To: Logan, Dennis Cc: Imboden, Andy; Perkins, Leslie
Subject:
RE: BA and EFH for Salem and HC Thanks for the note, Dennis. I'll talk to Andy today regarding the COI issue, but if there is, we may need you or.
someone in-house to finish up the BA & EFH.
17
Just from a scheduling perspective though, are we legally required by any rules to complete these 2 docs &
consultation before we issue a renewed license?
Thanks.
Bo Pham Chief, Projects Branch 1 Division of License Renewal Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission 301-415-8450 Original Message -----
From: Logan, Dennis Sent: Thursday, October 14, 2010 11:19 AM To: Pham, Bo
Subject:
RE: BA and EFH for Salem and HC Bo, I got a rough draft from AECOM. The EFH analysis did not address habitat, and so would have been unacceptable to NMFS. I sent it back with suggested edits and comments. That was about the time the conflict of interest question arose, and those drafts are the last I recall seeing. I can give you more information when I get back to the office next week.
Dennis From: Pham, Bo Sent: Wednesday, October 13, 2010 3:19 PM To: Logan, Dennis Cc: Imboden, Andy; Perkins, Leslie
Subject:
BA and EFH for Salem and HC
- Dennis, Do you have the last good draft for these, or were they still with AECOM?
Thanks.
Sent from NRC blackberry Bo Pham 18