ML11259A217
| ML11259A217 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Salem, Hope Creek  |
| Issue date: | 06/24/2011 |
| From: | Duda S AECOM |
| To: | Logan D Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation |
| References | |
| FOIA/PA-2011-0113 | |
| Download: ML11259A217 (1) | |
Text
I,.
Logan, Dennis From:
Duda, Steve [Steve. Duda@aecom.com]
Sent:
Thursday, June 24, 2010 6:29 AM To:
Logan, Dennis Cc:
Imboden, Andy; Dillard, Steve
Subject:
RE: Comments and edits on draft Chapter 2 Aquatic Ecology sections of Hope Creek and Salem dSEIS Thanks dennis, steve and I will dive into this and if we have any questions, I'll try and set up a call with everybody From: Logan, Dennis Logananrc.qov
Sent: Wednesday, June 23, 2010 4:19 PM To: Duda, Steve Cc: Imboden, Andy
Subject:
Comments and edits on draft Chapter 2 Aquatic Ecology sections of Hope Creek and Salem dSEIS
- Steve, I have reviewed an early draft of Chapter 2 for Hope Creek and Salem that Charles sent me, and I am sending you comments in the hope that you can incorporate them as you do Chapter 4, cumulative effects, alternatives, the biological assessments, and the EFH assessment. Charles also forwarded me have two small sections of Chapter 4, and I will send comments and edits for them later.
Overall, you've done a lot in the limited time allotted you. I have particular concern for organization, focus, and use of citations and referencing in Chapter 2. I have put my general comments on the chapter in "DTL Domments.docx". I have put some specific comments and edits on the several sections in "Chapter 2 V.2
... docx". I didn't put comments throughout, but tried to put in enough that you would understand my concerns and could take it from there. You can send revised drafts directly to me for review, if you'd like to do that.
Because NRC's method of citation and referencing in SEISs is generally the same as that used in TAFS and other such publications, I have attached TAFS' Guide for Authors (2006) for your reference and refer to it in my general comments.
Although Hope Creek and Salem have three generating units that were submitted to us as two applications, somehow you were allotted only the time normally allocated for a single application. I understand that your schedule is probably unrealistic for the amount of work that has to be done and appreciate the work that you have been doing for us to date.
Please call with any questions, Dennis Dennis Logan, Ph.D.
Ecologist U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Agency Mail Stop 0-22F1 Washington, DC 20555-0001 Phone: 301.415.0490 Fax: 301.415.2002 7