|
---|
Category:E-Mail
MONTHYEARML24036A0162024-02-0101 February 2024 NRC Email - Acknowledge and Accept the Indian Point Energy Center Request to Be Removed from NRC Headquarters Operation Officer (Hoo) Morning Authentication Code Calls ML23341A2002023-12-0707 December 2023 Email - Indian Point Energy Center Generating Units 1, 2, and 3 – Implementation Notice of Amendment No. 67, 300 and 276 to Independent Spent Fuel Storage Installation Only Emergency Plan (Ioep) ML23332A0802023-11-0808 November 2023 Email from State of New York on the Revised License Amendment for Indian Point Energy Center ISFSI Only Emergency Plan ML23331A9542023-11-0808 November 2023 Email - State of New York Comments on the Revised License Amendment for Indian Point Unit 2 and 3 Technical Specification Changes Reflecting Permanent Removal of Spent Fuel ML23325A1632023-11-0808 November 2023 State of New York Comments on the Revised License Amendment for Indian Point Unit 2 and 3 Technical Specification Changes Reflecting Permanent Removal of Spent Fuel ML23144A3382023-05-25025 May 2023 Dawn Giambalvo of Jersey City, New Jersey Email Against Treated Water Release from Indian Point Site ML23144A3422023-05-25025 May 2023 Peter Duda of Pearl River, New York Email Against Treated Water Release from Indian Point Site ML23144A3452023-05-25025 May 2023 Adam Kahn of Monsey, New York Email Against Treated Water Release from Indian Point Site ML23144A3502023-05-25025 May 2023 Dan Kwilecki of Montebello, New York Email Against Treated Water Release from Indian Point Site ML23144A3392023-05-25025 May 2023 David Morris of New City, New York Email Against Treated Water Release from Indian Point Site ML23144A3442023-05-25025 May 2023 Peggy Kurtz of Rockland County, New York Email Against Treated Water Release from Indian Point Site ML23136B1622023-05-15015 May 2023 Town of North Salem, County of Westchester, New York Board Resolution Letter Regarding Treated Water Release from Indian Point Site ML23109A0632023-04-17017 April 2023 Email Acceptance Review for IP2 and IP3 Amended Facility License and Technical Specification to Reflect Permanent Removal of Spent Fuel from Spent Fuel Pits ML23055A1112023-02-23023 February 2023 Alyse Peterson Email- NYSERDA No Comments on Indian Point Unit 2 - Regarding Holtec License Amendment Request to Revise Permanently Defueled Technical Specifications and Staffing Requirements with Spent Fuel Transfer to ISFSI (Dockets 50-24 ML23049A0032023-02-14014 February 2023 NRC Acceptance Email to Holtec for License Amendment Request for Approval of New ISFSI-Only Emergency Plan and Associated EAL Scheme ML22313A1682022-11-0909 November 2022 NRC Response to Updates to the Proposed Amended IP2 Master Trust ML22308A0912022-11-0303 November 2022 Email Acknowledgement for IP2 and IP3 Amended Facility License and Technical Specification to Reflect Permanent Removal of Spent Fuel from Spent Fuel Pits ML22276A1642022-09-29029 September 2022 New York State Revised Draft EA Response E-Mail ML22271A8492022-09-28028 September 2022 E-Mail Transmitting Revised Indian Point Exemption Draft EA ML22269A3452022-09-22022 September 2022 Email Objection to Holtec IP2 Master Decommissioning Trust Agreement for Indian Point Nuclear Generating Facility Unit 1 and 2, EPID L-2022-LLA-0072 ML22259A1992022-09-0202 September 2022 Acceptance for License Amendment Request to Modify Staffing Requirements Following SFP Transfer to Dry Storage ML22265A0142022-08-31031 August 2022 Email Acknowledgement for Amended and Restated Holtec IP3 Master Decommissioning Trust Agreement for Indian Point Nuclear Generating Facility Unit 3 ML22242A2592022-08-19019 August 2022 E-mail from K. Sturzebecher, NRC, to B. Noval, HDI, Acknowledgement for Amended and Restated Holtec IP2 Master Decommissioning Trust Agreement for Indian Point Nuclear Generating Facility Unit 1 and 2 ML22228A1332022-08-0909 August 2022 Acknowledgement for License Amendment Request to Modify Staffing Requirements Following SFP Transfer to Dry Storage ML22215A0432022-08-0101 August 2022 E-Mail Transmitting NYS NSA Exemption Comments & Draft EA Review Completion ML22208A0292022-07-19019 July 2022 E-Mail Transmitting Indian Point Exemption Draft EA ML22168A0072022-06-16016 June 2022 Acceptance Review for License Amendment Request to Revise License Condition to Eliminate Cyber Security Plan Requirements ML22112A0102022-04-21021 April 2022 Acceptance Review: Request for Exemption from 10 CFR 50.54(w)(1) Concerning Indian Point Energy Center Onsite Property Damage Insurance ML22112A0122022-04-21021 April 2022 Acceptance Review: Request for Exemption from 10 CFR 140.11(a)(4) Concerning Primary and Secondary Liability Insurance for Indian Point Energy Center ML22103A2432022-04-13013 April 2022 E-mail - Request for Additional Information - License Amendment Request to Revise Emergency Plan and Emergency Action Level Scheme for Permanently Defueled Condition for Indian Point Energy Center ML22104A0342022-04-13013 April 2022 E-mail from Z. Cruz, NRC to J. Fleming, Holtec - Request for Additional Information Related to Request for Exemption from Portions of 10 CFR 50.47 and Part 50 Appendix E for Indian Point Energy Center ML22038A2572022-02-0707 February 2022 E-mail from Z. Cruz, NRC, to J. Fleming, HDI - Acceptance Review: License Amendment Request to Revise Emergency Plan and Emergency Action Level Scheme to Address Permanently Defueled Condition for Indian Point Energy Center ML22035A1862022-02-0404 February 2022 E-mail to J. Fleming, Holtec, from Z. Cruz Perez, NRC - Acceptance Review: Exemption Requests from Portions of 10 CFR 50.47 and 10 CFR Part 50, Appendix E, Section IV for Indian Point Energy Center ML22028A1032022-01-28028 January 2022 E-mail Dated 1/28/2022, Transmittal of Draft Safety Evaluation for Proposed License Amendment Revision to Licensing Basis to Incorporate the Installation and Use of of New Auxiliary Lifting Device ML22038A1592022-01-24024 January 2022 NRR E-mail Capture - (External_Sender) 2021 IPEC Annual Sturgeon Impingement Report ML22006A0442022-01-0505 January 2022 Email from Z Cruz to J Fleming Request for Additional Information - HDI Indian Point Post-Shutdown Decommissioning Activities Report ML21337A2952021-12-0303 December 2021 Subsequent Request for Additional Information License Amendment Request to Revise Licensing Basis for New Auxiliary Lifting Device (E-mail Dated 12/3/2021) ML21335A3692021-12-0101 December 2021 Acceptance Review: Indian Point Energy Center - Exemption Request from 10 CFR Part 20 App G Section Iii.E ML21266A2972021-08-18018 August 2021 8/18/2021 E-mail from H. Specter to R. Guzman Public Comments to NRC, Indian Point Post-Shutdown Decommissioning Activities Report Public Meeting on July 29, 2021 ML21225A5012021-08-0909 August 2021 Email from NRC to the Shinnecock Indian Nation Announcing the IPEC PSDAR Public Meeting on August 18, 2021 ML21224A3032021-08-0909 August 2021 Email from NRC to the Mashantucket Pequot Tribe of Connecticut Announcing the IPEC PSDAR Public Meeting on August 18, 2021 ML21225A6142021-08-0909 August 2021 Email from NRC to the Tuscarora Nation Announcing the IPEC PSDAR Public Meeting on August 18, 2021 ML21225A5682021-08-0909 August 2021 Email from NRC to the Stockbridge-Munsee Community Band of Mohican Indians Announcing the IPEC PSDAR Public Meeting on August 18, 2021 ML21225A4252021-08-0909 August 2021 Email from NRC to the Oneida Nation of Wisconsin Announcing the IPEC PSDAR Public Meeting on August 18, 2021 ML21225A3142021-08-0606 August 2021 Email from NRC to the Oneida Indian Nation Announcing the IPEC PSDAR Public Meeting on August 18, 2021 ML21225A4402021-08-0606 August 2021 Email from NRC to the Onondaga Nation of Wisconsin Announcing the IPEC PSDAR Meeting on August 18, 2021 ML21225A5352021-08-0606 August 2021 Email from NRC to the Tonawanda Band of Seneca Announcing the IPEC PSDAR Public Meeting on August 18, 2021 ML21225A5462021-08-0606 August 2021 Email from NRC to the St. Regis Mohawk Tribe Announcing the IPEC PSDAR Public Meeting on August 18, 2021 ML21266A2942021-07-25025 July 2021 E-mail from Paul Blanch to NRC (N. Sheehan, D. Screnci) Public Comments to NRC, Indian Point Post-Shutdown Decommissioning Activities Report Public Meeting, July 29, 2021 ML21197A2002021-07-16016 July 2021 (E-mail 7/16/2021) NRC Staff Assessment and RAI Closeout HDI Fleet Decommissioning Quality Assurance Program and Indian Point Energy Center Quality Assurance Program Manual 2024-02-01
[Table view] |
Text
IPRenewal NPEmails From: Stuyvenberg, Andrew Sent: Tuesday, September 06, 2011 4:22 PM To: Gray, Dara F Cc: IPRenewal NPEmails
Subject:
FW: NRC staff comments on Draft BO for Proposed Indian Point License Renewal Attachments: NMFS Draft Biological Opinion- Consolidated NRC Comments-FINAL.pdf Dara - Attached you will find the NRC staffs comments on the Draft Biological Opinion. Please let me know if you have any questions.
- Best, Drew From: Stuyvenberg, Andrew Sent: Tuesday, September 06, 2011 4:09 PM To: 'Julie Crocker' Cc: IPRenewal NPEmails; Logan, Dennis; Turk, Sherwin; Balsam, Briana; Wrona, David
Subject:
NRC staff comments on Draft BO for Proposed Indian Point License Renewal Julie -
Attached please find the NRC staffs comments on the Draft Biological Opinion for the Proposed Indian Point License Renewal. Please let me know if you have any questions regarding the staffs comments.
Youll note that the comments pertain to the body of the Draft Biological Opinion. We are currently drafting a letter to respond to the issues raised in the cover letter to the Draft Biological Opinion. I anticipate that we will issue that letter early next week.
Again, please let me know if you have any questions, and I look forward to being in touch.
- Best, Drew
______________________________
Drew Stuyvenberg U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission 301-415-4006 Andrew.Stuyvenberg@nrc.gov 1
Hearing Identifier: IndianPointUnits2and3NonPublic_EX Email Number: 2890 Mail Envelope Properties (AF843158D8D87443918BD3AA953ABF783C4BD925FA)
Subject:
FW: NRC staff comments on Draft BO for Proposed Indian Point License Renewal Sent Date: 9/6/2011 4:21:54 PM Received Date: 9/6/2011 4:21:54 PM From: Stuyvenberg, Andrew Created By: Andrew.Stuyvenberg@nrc.gov Recipients:
"IPRenewal NPEmails" <IPRenewal.NPEmails@nrc.gov>
Tracking Status: None "Gray, Dara F" <DGray@entergy.com>
Tracking Status: None Post Office: HQCLSTR02.nrc.gov Files Size Date & Time MESSAGE 1195 9/6/2011 4:21:54 PM NMFS Draft Biological Opinion- Consolidated NRC Comments-FINAL.pdf 83935 Options Priority: Standard Return Notification: No Reply Requested: No Sensitivity: Normal Expiration Date:
Recipients Received:
1 NRC Staff Comments on NMFSs August 26, 2011, Draft Biological Opinion for License Renewal of the Indian Point Nuclear Generating Unit Nos. 2 and 3 General Substantive Comments:
The draft Biological Opinion does not mention Atlantic sturgeon. Should the NRC staff expect further discussions pertaining to the Atlantic sturgeon conference or a conference biological opinion from NMFS in the future? The NRC staffs December 10, 2010, Revised Biological Assessment (ML102990043) requested that NMFS address Atlantic sturgeon as appropriate, and NMFSs letter of February 16, 2011 (ML110550751) confirmed that a formal conference is appropriate.
Specific Substantive Comments:
Page 3, lines 36-37: The statement Without renewal, the facilities would close at the end of the current operating period should be clarified. Following NRC receipt of a timely filed license renewal application, NRCs timely renewal provision (in 10 CFR 2.109(b)) provides that the current license is not deemed to have expired until the application has been finally determined.
Entergy filed a timely application, and its current operating licenses will therefore not expire until the license renewal proceeding has concluded.
Page 6, line 2: Correct the sentence to read: Compliance with The terms of the SPDES permit, however, become part of would be required under the Federal action given that the operating license shall be subject to the conditions imposed under the Clean Water Act.
Page 11, line 12: Chironomids are not crustaceans; they are insects.
Page 31, lines 26-27: The draft BO says that this area [i.e., the action area] is the furthest accessible upstream spawning area. This seems wrong; was downstream intended?
Page 35, lines 15-17: NRC did not work with Entergy. Correct the sentence to read: During the ESA consultation process, NRC worked with After the NRC staff issued its initial Biological Assessment, Entergy to review the submitted corrected data, revising its previously reported impingement data and to make mathematical corrections associated with to correct certain accounting errors related to sampling frequency.
Page 37, lines 7-8: The draft BO says, In the Indian Point BA, NRC states that the modified Ristroph screen and fish return system at Salem is comparable to that at Indian Point. This statement did not appear in the NRC staffs December 2010 Revised Biological Assessment or in the NRC Staffs December 2008 Biological Assessment.
Page 39, lines 15-19: Correct the sentence to read: Given the facilities with a once-through cooling water system cannot operate without the intake and discharge of
2 water, and any limitations or requirements necessary to assure compliance with applicable Clean Water Act provisions would be conditions of the proposed renewed licenses, . . .
Page 54, lines 16-17: This is not an NRC project; revise clause to read, are necessary or appropriate for NRC and the applicant, Entergy, to minimize and monitor impacts of incidental take of endangered shortnose sturgeon.
Page 54, line 28: Revise clause to read, must be reported to NMFS and NRC. Similarly, on page 54, NRC should be added to items 3, 4, 5, and 6 to ensure that we get copies of the incident reports and annual reports, and we are notified when Entergy reaches 50% of the incidental take level.
Page 55 On page 55, NMFS should clarify exactly when the monitoring plan would be effective. Right now it seems to indicate that it would be effective the first day of the renewed license issuance, but the language could be clearer.
Page 56, lines 18-21: Revise the clause to read, An effective monitoring plan is essential to allow NRC and Entergy to fulfill the requirement to monitor the actual level of incidental take associated with the operation of Indian Point . . .
Page 56, line 38 - Revise both conservation requirements to replace The NRC should Page 57, line 12: support . . . with Entergy should support . . .
Editorial Comments:
Page 2, line 7: Change 1976 to 1975 Page 4, line 34: Correct the FSEIS section reference . . . NRCs FSEIS at Section 2.2.53 2.2.5.3 . . .
Page 7, line 40: Change uncertaintity to uncertainty.
Page 10, line 32: Add a bullet before provide water for washing . . .
Page 20, line 19: Change Moss to Most Page 21, lines 12, Insert distance in RM or miles, corresponding to the rkm or km 18, 19, 29, 30, values given 34-35:
Page 22, lines 1, 6, Insert distance in RM or miles, corresponding to the rkm or km values given Page 22, lines 18-19 Insert distance in rkm, corresponding to the RM value given Page 23, line 20: Change IP1 and IP2 to IP2 and IP3
3 Page 24, line 26: Change effecting to affecting Page 24, lines 33, Insert distance in rkm, corresponding to the RM value given 34, 35-36:
Page 30, line 24: revise to read: historically been a problem for shortnose sturgeon.
Page 43, lines 7, 24, Ziegeweid is misspelled (multiple variations).
43 Page 44, line 37 Ziegeweid is misspelled (Ziegewald).
Page 47, lines 20-22: This sentence (concerning uncertainty as to whether NYSDEC will reverse its denial of the Section 401 certificate) seems extraneous and irrelevant to the discussion here. I would delete it.
Page 49, lines 33-43: This is redundant; it restates lines 13-24 of page 48.
Page 54, lines 21, Revise paragraph numbers 3, 4, and 5 to 2, 3, and 4.
24, 27:
Page 56, line 16: Correct typographical error - revise arare to read, are Page 56, line 24: Revise the clause to read, sturgeon removed from the water are done so removed in a manner . . .