ML11187A109
| ML11187A109 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Kewaunee  |
| Issue date: | 07/05/2011 |
| From: | Feintuch K Plant Licensing Branch III |
| To: | Barrett H Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation |
| References | |
| Download: ML11187A109 (3) | |
Text
1 NRR-PMDAPEm Resource From:
Feintuch, Karl Sent:
Tuesday, July 05, 2011 6:56 PM To:
Barrett, Harold; Lain, Paul; Klein, Alex; Harrison, Donnie; Pickett, Douglas Cc:
Feintuch, Karl
Subject:
FW: NFPA 805 Commitment Letters from Kewaunee -update - no commitment letter was sent.
Attachments:
RE: NFPA 805 Commitment Letter from Kewaunee Craig Sly, Dominion Licensing for Kewaunee called today to convey their plans regarding the timing of a commitment letter. The key question for which Kewaunee seeks a response (via return message or a conference call) is:
To meet NRC expectations Does Dominion-Kewaunee have to accelerate its schedule for issuing a commitment letter?
If Dominion does not have to accelerate its decision making, it is currently proceeding as follows:
- 1.
On or before 7/08/2011 = decide to accelerate internally Dominions decision and commitment letter, if NRC expectation is to do so. Otherwise,
- 2.
On or before 7/15/2011 = reach internal decision whether to issue NFPA-805 plan by 7/29/11, or 8/31/11, or 9/30/11. To accomplish this decision, Dominion needs to assess progress and estimate a completion date. 7/15/2011 is the date by when Dominion currently believes it can estimate such a completion date
- 3.
On or before 7/18/2011 = issue the subject commitment letter, based on the decision made by Dominion..
This information (above) expands on the attached document (7/1/2011, 3:06 PM, Sly to Feintuch). Some of you are out of the office on leave at this time. I would like to respond to the 7/8/2011, milestone within this week. As a practical matter, accelerating the schedule to meet our expectation moves it forward by approximately one calendar week faster than their currently planning would.
Karl From: Feintuch, Karl Sent: Friday, July 01, 2011 3:20 PM To: Feintuch, Karl; Pickett, Douglas Cc: Barrett, Harold; Lain, Paul; Klein, Alex; Harrison, Donnie
Subject:
RE: NFPA 805 Commitment Letters from Kewaunee -update - no commitment letter was sent.
All, see attached. This just came in from Craig. We probably need a conference call early next week to address this email as our agenda. I am aware via all the out of office responses that you will not see this until next week. I have leave on Tue-Wed but 415-3079 routes to my cell phone.
Karl From: Feintuch, Karl Sent: Friday, July 01, 2011 3:04 PM To: Pickett, Douglas Cc: Barrett, Harold; Lain, Paul; Klein, Alex; Harrison, Donnie
Subject:
RE: NFPA 805 Commitment Letters from Kewaunee -update - no commitment letter was sent.
2 Craig Sly (Dominion corporate for Kewaunee) called me in response to my emailed enquiry. Your speculation (they may be under the impression that they do not need to submit a commitment letter) was correct. Sly had based his inaction on an interpretation within the SECY paper in combination with an earlier communication pertaining specifically to Kewaunee.
I dont want to portray (or misrepresent) how he came to not provide that commitment letter, so I asked him to explain in an email what happened. Something in our communications is still confusing to him. After I forward his communication to you as reply all, we will have the agenda for a conference call next week, if that is indicated by his response.
Karl From: Pickett, Douglas Sent: Friday, July 01, 2011 11:02 AM To: Feintuch, Karl; Kalyanam, Kaly Cc: Barrett, Harold; Lain, Paul; Klein, Alex
Subject:
NFPA 805 Commitment Letters from Kewaunee and Waterford
Karl/Kaly - With the exception of Waterford and Kewaunee, we have received NFPA 805 commitment letters from all the non-pilot plants. Can you both ask your licensee when we should expect to see their commitment letter?
Kaly - We are expecting Waterfords submittal in September. We also understand we may need to have a phone call to discuss alternate PRA methods.
Karl - There may be some confusion regarding whether Kewaunee. We expect their submittal by July 29 and they may be under the impression that they do not need to submit a commitment letter. However, since they did not meet the June 29 date, we were expecting a letter from them.
Also, FYI, I will be out of the office next week. Thus, please respond to Harry, Paul, and Alex.
Thanks - Doug Douglas V. Pickett, Senior Project Manager Calvert Cliffs, R.E. Ginna U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission 301-415-1364 Email: douglas.pickett@nrc.gov
Hearing Identifier:
NRR_PMDA Email Number:
93 Mail Envelope Properties (26E42474DB238C408C94990815A02F096007501900)
Subject:
FW: NFPA 805 Commitment Letters from Kewaunee -update - no commitment letter was sent.
Sent Date:
7/5/2011 6:56:11 PM Received Date:
7/5/2011 6:56:00 PM From:
Feintuch, Karl Created By:
Karl.Feintuch@nrc.gov Recipients:
"Feintuch, Karl" <Karl.Feintuch@nrc.gov>
Tracking Status: None "Barrett, Harold" <Harold.Barrett@nrc.gov>
Tracking Status: None "Lain, Paul" <Paul.Lain@nrc.gov>
Tracking Status: None "Klein, Alex" <Alex.Klein@nrc.gov>
Tracking Status: None "Harrison, Donnie" <Donnie.Harrison@nrc.gov>
Tracking Status: None "Pickett, Douglas" <Douglas.Pickett@nrc.gov>
Tracking Status: None Post Office:
HQCLSTR01.nrc.gov Files Size Date & Time MESSAGE 4256 7/5/2011 6:56:00 PM RE: NFPA 805 Commitment Letter from Kewaunee 240861 Options Priority:
Standard Return Notification:
No Reply Requested:
No Sensitivity:
Normal Expiration Date:
Recipients Received: