|
|---|
Category:Rulemaking-Comment
MONTHYEARML18157A3072018-06-0101 June 2018
Comment (035) of Anonymous Individual on the Requirements for the Indefinite Storage of Spent Nuclear Fuel
ML16049A4312016-02-17017 February 2016
Comment (029) of Eric Misener on Behalf of Seneca Community Consolidated School District #170 on ANPR-26, 50, 52, 73, and 140 - Regulatory Improvements for Decommissioning Power Reactors
ML11146A1102011-05-25025 May 2011
2011/05/25-Comment (5) of Mark Callahan on Proposed Rule Pr 26 Regarding Alternative to Minimum Days Off Requirements
ML1100400142011-01-0101 January 2011
2011/01/01-Comment (20) of Justin Prahl on Nei'S Petition for Rulemaking PRM-26-5, Regarding Part 26, Fitness-for-Duty Programs.
ML1100600222010-12-29029 December 2010
2010/12/29-Comment (23) of Mike Mulka, on Nei'S Petition for Rulemaking PRM-26-5, Fitness-For-Duty Programs
ML1100302362010-12-29029 December 2010
2010/12/29-Comment (16) of Michael Mulka, on Nei'S Petition for Rulemaking PRM-26-5, Regarding Fitness-for-Duty Programs.
ML1100302352010-12-29029 December 2010
2010/12/29-Comment (15) of Paul West, on Nei'S on Proposed Rulemaking PRM-26-5 Regarding Fitness-for-Duty Programs.
ML1036404582010-12-29029 December 2010
2010/12/29-Comment (14) of Michael Backo, on Nei'S Petition for Rulemaking PRM-26-5, Regarding Fitness-for-Duty Programs.
ML1036205212010-12-26026 December 2010
2010/12/26-Comment (12) of Ronald Vanderhyden, on Nei'S Petition for Rulemaking PRM-26-5, Regarding Fitness-for-Duty Programs
ML1035003982010-12-15015 December 2010
Comment (3) of Michelle Medrow-Kielski, on PRM-26-6, Minimum Day Off Requirements for Security Officers Working 12 Hour Shifts from an Average of 3 Days Per Week to 2.5 or 2 Days Per Week
RS-09-070, Comment (12) of Darin M. Benyak, on Behalf of Exelon Generation Company, LLC, on ANPR 171, Variable Annual Fee Structure for Power Reactors2009-06-0303 June 2009
Comment (12) of Darin M. Benyak, on Behalf of Exelon Generation Company, LLC, on ANPR 171, Variable Annual Fee Structure for Power Reactors
ML0717804182007-06-25025 June 2007
Comment (9) Submitted by Exelon Generation Company LLC, Darin M. Benyak, on Ucs'S PRM-73-13 Regarding to Amend 10 CFR Part 73, Physical Protection of Plants and Materials
ML0716305412007-06-12012 June 2007
Comment (9) Submitted by Exelon Generation Company, LLC, Darin M. Benyak on Pogo and Ucs Re Amend 10 CFR Part 50 Concerning Design Basis Threat
RS-04-059, Comment (8) Submitted by Exelon Generation, LLC and Amergen Energy Co., Kenneth A. Ainger, on Proposed Rules PR-19, 20 and 50, Re Collection, Reporting or Posting of Information; Availability of Draft Rule Language2004-04-0909 April 2004
Comment (8) Submitted by Exelon Generation, LLC and Amergen Energy Co., Kenneth A. Ainger, on Proposed Rules PR-19, 20 and 50, Re Collection, Reporting or Posting of Information; Availability of Draft Rule Language
ML0323201352003-08-0101 August 2003
Comment (9) Submitted by Morgan Lewis & Brockus, Llp, Steven P. Frantz, P.M. Bessette, on Behalf of Exelon Gen., S. Texas, on Proposed Rule PR-50 Re Risk-Informed Categorization & Treatment of Structures, Systems & Components for Nuclear Po
2018-06-01
[Table view] |
Text
Page 1 of 1 PR 26 (76FR23208) 5 As of: May 26, 2011 Received:
May 25, 2011 Status: Pending-Post PUBLIC SUBMISSION Tracking No. 80e3lcac Comments Due: May 26, 2011 Submission Type: Web Docket: NRC-2011-0058 DOCKETED Alternative Controls Governing Minimum Time Off USNRC Comment On: NRC-2011-0058-0001 May_26, 2011 (9:07am)Alternative to Minimum Days Off Requirements OFFICE OF SECRETARY Document:
NRC-2011-0058-DRAFT-0004 RULEMAKINGS AND Comment on FR Doc # 2011-09925 ADJUDICATIONS STAFF Submitter Information Name: Mark Callahan Address:.2065 N, 2653 Road Marseilles, IL, 61341 Submitter's Representative:
Local 15 IBEW Organization:
Exelon Nuclear Government Agency Type: Federal Government Agency: NRC General Comment The current work hour rule is intended to reduce worker fatigue, but my expirience is that it has the OPPISITE effect.If working a Dayshift schedule having to take a day off is not disruptive to one's sleep pattern. HOWEVER, when working BACKSHIFT schedule taking a one day break disrupts this sleep patern. This disruption takes SEVERAL DAYS to recover from, thus INDUCING FATIGUE. My personal expirience supports the idea that once adjusted to an unnatural sleep patern (nightshift), it is far better to continue that pattern for the duration of an outage. My past expirience shows that even working 14 to 21 nights in a row is LESS FATIGUEING than breaking that sleep cycle for one day.Perhaps the OPTION of working one 8 hour9.259259e-5 days <br />0.00222 hours <br />1.322751e-5 weeks <br />3.044e-6 months <br /> shift every week could limit hours worked during outages without disrupting the established sleep patern an individual has been acclicmated to.Beside the fact of not reducing worker fatigue, the current work hour rule has negatively impacted my earning ability by $12,000 or mor per year.Thank you for taking my comments into consideration, Respectfully, Mark Callahan Mech. Maintenance Tech.LaSalle County Station Exelon Nuclear M srw https://fdms.erulemaking.net/fdms-web-agency/component/submitterlnfoCoverPage?Call=Print&Printld...
05/26/2011
- Rulemaking Comments 9 From: Sent: To:
Subject:
Attachments:
Gallagher, Carol Thursday, May 26, 2011 7:52 AM Rulemaking Comments Comment on Alternative to Minimum Days Off Requirements NRC-2011-0058-DRAFT-0004.pdf Van, Attached for docketing is a comment from Mark Callahan on the above noted proposed rule (76 FR 23208;3150-AI94) that I received via the regulations.gov website on 5/25/11.Thanks, Carol 1
