ML111430748

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Aam - NRC Slides for May 18, 2011
ML111430748
Person / Time
Site: Limerick  Constellation icon.png
Issue date: 05/18/2011
From: Paul Krohn
Reactor Projects Region 1 Branch 4
To:
Krohn P
References
Download: ML111430748 (20)


Text

Limerick Annual Assessment Meeting Limerick Generating Station Safety Performance in 2010 U.S. Nuclear Plant Safety in light of Japan Events 2010 Reactor Oversight Process Nuclear Regulatory Commission - Region I 1

NRC Representatives

  • Nicole Sieller - Resident Inspector 2

Agenda

  • Introduction
  • Discussion of Limerick performance during 2010 2010
  • Discussion of U.S. nuclear plant safety in light of Japan events
  • NRC to address public questions
  • Closing remarks 3
  • Exelon operated Limerick in a manner that preserved the public health and safety and protected the environment.

NRC Assessment Summary

  • Licensee Response Column of the Action Matrix
  • Baseline inspections are planned for 2011 4

NRC Action Matrix Licensee

Response

Regulatory

Response

Degraded Cornerstone Multiple Repetitive Degraded Cornerstone Unacceptable Performance All Inputs are Green; Cornerstone Objectives Fully Met 1 or 2 White Inputs; Cornerstone Objectives Fully Met 2 White or 1 Yellow Input; Cornerstone Objectives Met w/

Moderate Multiple Yellow Inputs or 1 Red Input; Cornerstone Objectives Met w/

Significant Overall Unacceptable Performance; Plants not permitted to Increasing safety significance Increasing NRC inspection efforts Increasing NRC/Licensee management involvement Increasing regulatory actions Fully Met Fully Met Moderate Degradation in Safety Performance Significant Degradation in Safety Performance permitted to Operate w/in this Column; Unacceptable Margin to Safety

  • 5891 hours0.0682 days <br />1.636 hours <br />0.00974 weeks <br />0.00224 months <br /> of inspection and related activities
  • 2 resident inspectors on site - residents perform inspections daily and can respond to plant Inspection Activities in 2010 events at any time
  • 18 regional inspectors
  • 2 major team inspections Fire Protection Inspection Problem Identification

& Resolution 6

  • All Green Performance Indicators January 1 through December 31, 2010 Performance Indicator and Inspection Results
  • 5 Non Cited Violations
  • No Greater than Green inspection findings 7
  • Limerick was operated safely
  • Licensee Response column of the Action Matrix
  • Baseline inspections planned for 2011 2010 Limerick Assessment Summary Baseline inspections planned for 2011 8

Peach Bottom Assessment Meeting U.S. Nuclear Plant Safety in Light of Japan Events 9

U.S. Nuclear Plants Remain Safe

  • NRC requires plants to be designed to withstand site specific external events
  • NRC requires a defense-in-depth approach to NRC requires a defense in depth approach to safety
  • NRC performs independent safety inspections
  • NRC assesses new safety information and requires improvements 10

Designed for Site Specific Natural Events

  • Tsunamis
  • Hurricanes
  • Floods
  • Tornadoes 11

The NRC Requires Defense-In-Depth

  • Redundant and diverse safety systems
  • Multiple physical barriers to
  • Multiple physical barriers to contain radioactive material
  • Testing and inspection of systems important to safety
  • Emergency planning 12

NRC Independent Safety Inspections Reactor Oversight Program

  • NRC inspectors have unfettered access to all plant activities related to nuclear safety and security y

y

  • At least two full-time NRC resident inspectors at each nuclear plant
  • NRC inspectors review many areas including Operations, Maintenance, Security, Engineering, Radiological Controls, and Fire Protection 13

NRC Requires Safety Improvements NRC assesses new safety information, develops lessons learned, and requires safety enhancements:

  • NRC operating experience program 14
  • Rulemaking (Station Blackout)
  • Post TMI Actions
  • Post 9/11 Orders
  • Generic Safety Issues

NRC Response to Events in Japan

  • NRC conducting a methodical and systematic review
  • Near term actions (<90 days) d ti dditi l

15

- conducting additional inspections.

- identifying near term operational issues

  • Longer term actions

Meeting Ground Rules Rich Barkley, PE, Nuclear & Environmental Engineer, Meeting Facilitator

  • Please ensure you have filled out a white card if youd like to speak
  • To be fair, the amount of time allotted will be limited and based on the number of speakers who sign up
  • Please be courteous to the speaker, NRC staff, and other meeting attendees
  • Written comments are welcome during and after this meeting - Please give them to any NRC Representative. Comments may be sent via mail via the NRC Meeting Feedback Form.

Questions 17

Information Resources Regarding Events in Japan

htm

Contacting the NRC

  • Report a safety concern
  • 1-800-695-7403
  • allegation@nrc.gov
  • General questions
  • www.nrc.gov
  • Region I Public Affairs
  • End of Presentation 20