ML11130A138
| ML11130A138 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Columbia  |
| Issue date: | 04/22/2011 |
| From: | NRC Region 4 |
| To: | Energy Northwest |
| References | |
| 50-397/11-301 50-397/11-301 | |
| Download: ML11130A138 (3) | |
Text
Attachment 6 OBDI 202 - IOLE Process DRAFT OUTLINE COMMENTS Facility: Columbia First Exam Date: 04/22/2011 Written Exam Outline (Date)
Comment Resolution 1 No Comments 2
3 4
5 Administrative JPM Outline (Date)
Comment Resolution 1 No Comments 2
3 4
5 Control Room / In-Plant System JPM Outline (Date)
Comment Resolution 1 There was no ES-201-2 submitted with the draft outline package.
The form was submitted.
2 3
4 5
Simulator Scenario Outline Comments (Date)
Comment Resolution 1
Scenario 1 - Event 7 is classified as a component malfunction. This event should be a major event as it involves a complete loss of feedwater. This will make 3 major events which exceeds the limit of 2.
This scenario was rewritten to address comments 1 and 2.
OBDI 202 - IOLE Process 2
Scenario 1 - This scenario does not meet the minimum I/C events for the ATC or BOP candidates.
3 Scenario 2 - Event 4 credits the ATC with both a reactivity event and an I/C event. Credit cannot be taken for both.
Suggest deleting the reactivity credit.
The scenario was revised so the ATC only gets credit for the I/C element of event 4.
4 Scenario 3 - Event 4 should be classified as a Major event rather than a I/C event.
Event 4 was replaced with a different event.
5 Scenario 3 - Event 8 is not an event since it a direct result of Event 7 (i.e., no additional malfunctions were used).
No credit is to be given for event 8 as a credit that satisfies the NUREG-1021 requirements.
6 Scenario 3 - There are not enough I/C malfunctions for the ATC or BOP candidates.
A BOP I/C event was added to the scenario.
7 8
9