|
|---|
Category:Letter
MONTHYEARML24011A1982024-01-12012 January 2024
ISFSI, Notice of Organization Change for Site Vice President
ML23342A1082024-01-0909 January 2024
Independent Spent Fuel Storage Installation Security Inspection Plan
ML23353A1742023-12-19019 December 2023
ISFSI, Emergency Plan, Revision 23-04
L-23-019, Proof of Financial Protection 10 CFR 140.152023-12-18018 December 2023
Proof of Financial Protection 10 CFR 140.15
ML23339A0442023-12-0505 December 2023
Issuance of Amendment No. 68, 301 and 277 Regarding Changes to Implement the Independent Spent Fuel Storage Installation Physical Security Plan
ML23326A1322023-12-0505 December 2023
Issuance of Amendment No. 67, 300 & 276 to Implement the Independent Spent Fuel Storage Installation Only Emergency Plan
ML23338A2262023-12-0404 December 2023
Signed Amendment No. 27 to Indemnity Agreement No. B-19
ML23356A0212023-12-0101 December 2023
American Nuclear Insurers, Secondary Financial Protection (SFP) Program
ML23242A2772023-11-30030 November 2023
NRC Letter Issuance - IP LAR for Units 2 and 3 Renewed Facility Licenses and PDTS to Reflect Permanent Removal of Spent Fuel from SFPs
ML23338A0482023-11-30030 November 2023
ISFSI, Report of Changes to Physical Security, Training and Qualification, Safeguards Contingency Plan, and ISFSI Security Program, Revision 28
ML22339A1572023-11-27027 November 2023
Letter - Indian Point - Ea/Fonsi Request for Exemptions from Certain Emergency Planning Requirements for 10 CFR 50.47 and 10 CFR Part 50, Appendix E
IR 05000003/20230032023-11-21021 November 2023
NRC Inspection Report Nos. 05000003/2023003, 05000247/2023003, 05000286/2023003, and 07200051/2023003
ML23100A1172023-11-17017 November 2023
NRC Response - Indian Point Energy Center Generating Units 1, 2, and 3 Letter with Enclosures Regarding Changes to Remove the Cyber Security Plan License Condition
ML23050A0032023-11-17017 November 2023
Letter - Issuance Indian Point Unit 2 License Amendment Request to Modify Tech Specs for Staffing Requirements Following Spent Fuel Transfer to Dry Storage
ML23100A1252023-11-17017 November 2023
Letter and Enclosure 1 - Issuance Indian Point Energy Center Units 1, 2, and 3 Exemption for Offsite Primary and Secondary Liability Insurance Indemnity Agreement
ML23100A1432023-11-16016 November 2023
Letter - Issuance Indian Point Energy Center Generating Units 1, 2, and 3 Exemption Concerning Onsite Property Damage Insurance (Docket Nos. 50-003, 50-247, 50-286)
ML23064A0002023-11-13013 November 2023
NRC Issuance for Approval-Indian Point EC Units 1, 2 and 3 Emergency Plan and Emergency Action Level Scheme Amendments
L-23-012, Master Decommissioning Trust Agreement Changes for Indian Point Nuclear Generating Units 1, 2 and 3, Pilgrim Nuclear Power Station, Palisades Nuclear Plant and the Non-Qualified Trust for Big Rock Point2023-11-13013 November 2023
Master Decommissioning Trust Agreement Changes for Indian Point Nuclear Generating Units 1, 2 and 3, Pilgrim Nuclear Power Station, Palisades Nuclear Plant and the Non-Qualified Trust for Big Rock Point
ML23306A0992023-11-0202 November 2023
and Indian Point Energy Center, Notification of Changes in Schedule in Accordance with 10 CFR 50.82(a)(7)
ML23063A1432023-11-0101 November 2023
Letter - Issuance Holtec Request for Indian Point Energy Center Generating Units 1, 2, and 3 Exemptions from Certain Emergency Planning Requirements of 10 CFR 50.47 and Part 50
ML23292A0262023-10-19019 October 2023
LTR-23-0211-RI Thomas Congdon, Executive Deputy, Department of Public Service, Chair, Indian Point Decommissioning Oversight Board, Letter Independent Spent Fuel Storage Installation Inspection and Office of the Inspector General Report-RI
ML23289A1582023-10-16016 October 2023
Decommissioning International - Registration of Spent Fuel Casks and Notification of Permanent Removal of All Indian Point Unit 3 Spent Fuel Assemblies from the Spent Fuel Pit
ML23270A0082023-09-27027 September 2023
Registration of Spent Fuel Casks
ML23237A5712023-09-22022 September 2023
09-22-2023 Letter to Dwaine Perry, Chief, Ramapo Munsee Nation, from Chair Hanson, Responds to Letter Regarding Opposition of the Release and Dumping of Radioactive Waste from Indian Point Nuclear Power Plant Into the Hudson River
ML23242A2182023-09-12012 September 2023
IPEC NRC Response to the Town of New Windsor, Ny Board Certified Motion Letter Regarding Treated Water Release from IP Site (Dockets 50-003, 50-247, 50-286)
ML23250A0812023-09-0707 September 2023
Registration of Spent Fuel Casks
ML23255A0142023-08-31031 August 2023
LTR-23-0211 Thomas Congdon, Executive Deputy, Department of Public Service, Chair, Indian Point Decommissioning Oversight Board, Letter Independent Spent Fuel Storage Installation Inspection and Office of the Inspector General Report
IR 05000003/20230022023-08-22022 August 2023
NRC Inspection Report 05000003/2023002, 05000247/2023002, 05000286/2023002, and 07200051/2023002
ML23227A1852023-08-15015 August 2023
Request for a Revised Approval Date Regarding the Indian Point Energy Center Permanently Defueled Emergency Plan and Emergency Action Level Scheme
ML23222A1442023-08-10010 August 2023
Registration of Spent Fuel Casks
ML23208A1642023-07-26026 July 2023
Village of Croton-on-Hudson New York Letter Dated 7-26-23 Re Holtec Wastewater
ML23200A0422023-07-19019 July 2023
Registration of Spent Fuel Casks
ML23235A0602023-07-17017 July 2023
LTR-23-0194 Dwaine Perry, Chief, Ramapo Munsee Nation, Ltr Opposition of the Release and Dumping of Radioactive Waste from Indian Point Nuclear Power Plant Into the Hudson River
ML23194A0442023-07-11011 July 2023
Clarification for Indian Point Energy Center License Amendment Request, Independent Spent Fuel Storage Installation Physical Security Plan
ML23192A1002023-07-11011 July 2023
Response to Request for Additional Information Regarding License Amendment Request to Revise the Emergency Plan and Emergency Action Level Scheme
ML23171B0432023-06-23023 June 2023
Letter - Indian Point Energy Center - Request for Additional Information for Independent Spent Fuel Storage Installation Facility-Only Emergency Plan License Amendment
ML23118A0972023-06-0606 June 2023
06-06-23 Letter to the Honorable Michael V. Lawler, Et Al., from Chair Hanson Regarding Holtec'S Announcement to Expedite Plans to Release Over 500,000 Gallons of Radioactive Wastewater from Indian Point Energy Center Into the Hudson River
ML23144A3512023-05-25025 May 2023
Clementina Bartolotta of Pearl River, New York Email Against Treated Water Release from Indian Point Site
ML23144A3522023-05-25025 May 2023
Loredana Bidmead of New York E-Mail Against Treated Water Release from Indian Point Site
ML23144A3412023-05-25025 May 2023
Dianne Schirripa of Rockland County, New York Email Against Treated Water Release from Indian Point Site
ML23144A3472023-05-25025 May 2023
David Mart of Blauvelt, New York Email Against Treated Water Release from Indian Point Site
ML23144A3402023-05-25025 May 2023
Melvin Israel of New York Email Against Treated Water Release from Indian Point Site
ML23144A3542023-05-25025 May 2023
Terri Thal of New City, New York Email Against Treated Water Release from Indian Point Site
ML23144A3532023-05-25025 May 2023
John Shaw of New York Email Against Treated Water Release from Indian Point Site
2024-01-09
[Table view] |
Text
UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION WASHINGTON, D.C. 20555-0001 March 31, 2011 Mr. Paul Blanch 135 Hyde Road West Hartford, CT 06117
Dear Mr. Blanch:
In your letter to the Executive Director for Operations (EDO) of the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC), dated October 25,2010, you requested pursuant to Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations (10 CFR), Part 2, Section 2.206 of the NRC's regulations, that the NRC order the licensee for Indian Point Nuclear Generating Unit Nos. 2 and 3 (IP2 and IP3) to demonstrate that the licensee has the capability to protect the public in the event of a rupture, explosion, or fire on the gas pipelines which cross the site. You also requested that the NRC review all available information, including demanding necessary information from the licensee, to ensure compliance with all regulatory requirements. Your petition was referred to the Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation (NRR).
On November 2, 2010, you participated in a telecon with the NRR Petition Review Board (PRB).
During that call you requested to have another call after you reviewed the redactions made by the NRC staff in the publically available copy of your petition. On November 5, 2010, you submitted a supplement to your petition. On November 9, 2010, you participated in another telecon with the NRR PRB. On February 18, 2011, the PRB informed you that their initial recommendation was to not accept your petition for review, as these issues have already been the subject of NRC review and evaluation. On March 3, 2011, you participated in another telecon with the PRB, and later that day submitted a supplement to your petition. The PRB has concluded that your petition does not meet the criteria for further review, as the issues have already been the subject of NRC review and evaluation and the NRC had previously resolved the issues. The PRB did not identify any violation of NRC requirements.
To provide some background, in 1968 the matter of the pipelines was considered during the initial licensing of IP3 (the pipelines are closer to IP3 than to IP2). On September 21, 1973, the Atomic Energy Commission (AEC) issued a safety evaluation report for IP3 which stated, "Two natural gas lines cross the Hudson River and pass about 620 feet from the Indian Point 3 containment structure. Based on previous staff reviews, failures of these gas lines will not impair the safe operation of Indian Point 3."
On December 6, 1995, the licensee submitted the Individual Plant Examination of External Events (IPEEE) report for IP3. In this report, the licensee first evaluated any susceptibility to damage to the pipelines from seismic events. Based on a hazard analysis, the licensee concluded that the probability of occurrence was low enough that the pipelines could be screened out as a seismic vulnerability. The licensee next considered pipeline failures from other causes, such as an inadvertent overpressure condition. The licensee screened this scenario out from further consideration based on the low probability of the scenario. The NRC's staff evaluation report on the IP3 IPEEE did not identify any discrepancies with this approach.
In April 2003, following questions on the pipelines from a member of the public, NRC staff reviewed the possible consequences of a rupture of a pipeline, independent of the probability of
P. Blanch -2 a pipeline failure. The NRC staff concluded that for a large rupture and resulting fire, safety related structures would not be significantly affected.
In a report dated August 14, 2008, the licensee performed another evaluation of the pipelines.
This evaluation again reviewed the possible consequences of a rupture of the pipelines, and concluded that it would not damage safety-related structures. The IP3 Updated Final Safety Analysis Report, Rev. 3, Section 2.2.2, discusses the pipelines and lists the 2008 report as a reference.
After receiving your petition, the NRC staff reviewed these reports and did not identify any violations of NRC regulations or any new information that would change the staff's previous conclusion that the pipelines do not endanger the safe or secure operation of IP2 or IP3.
Thank you for your interest in these matters.
Sincerely, Theodore R. Quay, Deputy Director Division of Policy and Rulemaking Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation Docket Nos. 50-247 and 50-286 cc: Distribution via Listserv
P. Blanch -2 a pipeline failure. The NRC staff concluded that for a large rupture and resulting fire, safety related structures would not be significantly affected.
In a report dated August 14, 2008, the licensee performed another evaluation of the pipelines.
This evaluation again reviewed the possible consequences of a rupture of the pipelines, and concluded that it would not damage safety-related structures. The IP3 Updated Final Safety Analysis Report, Rev. 3, Section 2.2.2, discusses the pipelines and lists the 2008 report as a reference.
After receiving your petition, the NRC staff reviewed these reports and did not identify any violations of NRC regulations or any new information that would change the staff's previous conclusion that the pipelines do not endanger the safe or secure operation of IP2 or IP3.
Thank you for your interest in these matters.
Sincerely,
/raJ Theodore R. Quay, Deputy Director Division of Policy and Rulemaking Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation Docket Nos. 50-247 and 50-286 cc: Distribution via Ustserv DISTRIBUTION: G20100655/EDATS: OEDO-2010-0854 Public LPL1-1 RtF RidsNrrOd Resource RidsNrrDorlLpl1-1 Resource RidsNrrPMlndianPoint Resource RidsNrrPMNineMilePoint Resource RidsNrrLASUttie Resource RidsNrrDorlDpr Resource RidsOgcRp Resource RidsNrrDorl Resource RidsOGCMailCenter Resource RidsNrrMailCenter Resource RidsRgn1 MailCenter Resource RidsAcrsAcnw&mMailCenter Resource RidsEDOMailcenter Resource RidsOpaMail Resource T. Quay, NRR T. Mensah, NRR B. Bickett, RI Package: ML110890270 Incoming: ML103020293, ML103260134, ML110630131 Transcripts: ML103081077, ML103190125, ML110680090 Letter' ML110890309 *Concurrence via e-mail
. OFFICE LPL 1-1/PM LPL 1-1/LA RGN1/DRP* LPL 1-1/BC DPRIDD I NAME JBoska SUttle BBickett NSalgado TQuay I DATE 3/30/11 3/30/11 3/31/11 3/31/11 3/31/11 Official Record Copy
