ML110760394

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Lr - Phone Call on 3/21 Seabrook LRA Environmental Review
ML110760394
Person / Time
Site: Seabrook NextEra Energy icon.png
Issue date: 03/17/2011
From:
Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
To:
References
Download: ML110760394 (3)


Text

1 SeabrookNPEm Resource From:

Wentzel, Michael Sent:

Thursday, March 17, 2011 11:36 AM To:

Cliche, Richard

Subject:

Phone Call on 3/21 re: Seabrook LRA Environmental Review Attachments:

Seabrook Environmental RAI Response Clarifications.docx

Rick, As we discussed yesterday, we would like to have a phone call to clarify some of the data related to the Seabrook aquatic monitoring data. Attached are some specific points that we would like to discuss. The call-in information is provided below. If you have any questions, please let me know.

Phone number: 888-989-9854 Passcode: 29466

Thanks, Mike MichaelWentzel ProjectManager NRR/DLR/RPB1 (301)4156459 michael.wentzel@nrc.gov

Hearing Identifier:

Seabrook_License_Renewal_NonPublic Email Number:

911 Mail Envelope Properties (C0A338EE37A11447B136119705BF9A3FC37D7540B9)

Subject:

Phone Call on 3/21 re: Seabrook LRA Environmental Review Sent Date:

3/17/2011 11:36:19 AM Received Date:

3/17/2011 11:36:18 AM From:

Wentzel, Michael Created By:

Michael.Wentzel@nrc.gov Recipients:

"Cliche, Richard" <Richard.Cliche@fpl.com>

Tracking Status: None Post Office:

HQCLSTR02.nrc.gov Files Size Date & Time MESSAGE 543 3/17/2011 11:36:18 AM Seabrook Environmental RAI Response Clarifications.docx 20368 Options Priority:

Standard Return Notification:

No Reply Requested:

No Sensitivity:

Normal Expiration Date:

Recipients Received:

Aquatic Ecology Clarifications for Seabrook Station

1. Clarify whether blank cells within Table 4-6 of NAI (2010) should be treated as 0 (e.g.

Seabrook collected samples, but did not identify any fish of the particular species), as suggested by EPA (2002).

2. Clarify why NAI (2010) (Table 4-6) and Seabrooks response to RAI #2 (for aquatic ecology) report different entrainment estimates for Atlantic cod, cunner, fourbeard rockling, goosefish, lumpfish, and winter flounder than EPA (2002) (Table G3-6) from 1990-1998. Entrainment estimates for other species were similar among NAI (2010) and EPA (2002), as long as blank cells in Table 4-6 (NAI 2010) are treated as 0.
3. Clarify why NAI (2010) (Appendix Table 4-3) report different impingement estimates for Atlantic cod, Atlantic herring, fourbeard rocking, lumpfish, red hake, sculpin spp., killifish, threespine stickleback, windowpane, and winter flounder than EPA (2002) (Table G3-2) from 1994-1998. Impingement estimates for other species were the same among NAI (2010) and EPA (2002).

References:

Normandeau Associates Inc (NAI). 2010. Seabrook Station 2009 Environmental Monitoring in the Hampton - Seabrook Area: A Characterization of Environmental Conditions. Prepared for NextEra Energy Seabrook, LLC.

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). 2002. Case Study Analysis for the Proposed Section 316(b) Phase II Existing Facilities Rule. EPA-821-R-02-002. Office of Water. Washington, DC.