ML110750069

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Correction to Request for Alternative to ASME Code Case N-579, Use of Nonstandard Nuts, Class 1, 2, and 3, Mc, CS Components and Supports Construction,Section III, Division 1, Third 10-Year Inservice Inspection Interval
ML110750069
Person / Time
Site: Wolf Creek Wolf Creek Nuclear Operating Corporation icon.png
Issue date: 03/21/2011
From: Hall J
Plant Licensing Branch IV
To: Matthew Sunseri
Wolf Creek
Hall, J R, NRR/DORL/LPL4, 301-415-4032
References
TAC ME5809
Download: ML110750069 (7)


Text

UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION WASHINGTON, D.C. 20555-0001 March 21,2011 Mr. Matthew W. Sunseri President and Chief Executive Officer Wolf Creek Nuclear Operating Corporation Post Office Box 411 Burlington, KS 66839

SUBJECT:

WOLF CREEK GENERATING STATION-CORRECTION TO APPROVAL FOR USE OF AN ALTERNATIVE TO ASME CODE CASE N-579 (TAC NO. ME5809)

Dear Mr. Sunseri:

By letter dated November 18, 2010, the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) staff authorized Wolf Creek Nuclear Operating Corporation (WCNOC, the licensee) to use an alternative to the requirements of the American SOCiety of Mechanical Engineers Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code (ASIVIE Code),Section III, Code Case N-579, "Use of Nonstandard Nuts, Class 1,2, and 3, MC, CS Components and Supports Construction,Section III, Division 1:' The approved alternative, proposed by the licensee in its letter dated June 10, 2010, allows the use of certain hydraulic nuts made with a different material than the SA-194 material specified in Code Case N-579, and a thread configuration different than that specified in ASME B1.1. The licensee plans to use these nuts in its replacement of the channel head flange bolting of the Excess Letdown Heat Exchanger, during refueling outage 18 at the Wolf Creek Generating Station (WCGS), scheduled to begin in March 2011.

By letter dated March 3, 2011, WCNOC stated that it subsequently identified an incorrect reference in its original submittal, dated June 10, 2010, and requested NRC approval of a correction to the previously approved relief request. In Section 2 of its submitted dated June 10, 2010, the licensee incorrectly stated that the applicable Construction Code for the Excess Letdown Heat Exchanger at WCGS is the ASME Section III, 1974 Edition including Summer 1975 Addendum. The correct ASME Construction Code Addendum for this component as clarified in the licensee's letter dated March 3, 2011, is the Summer 1974 Addendum.

Following discovery of the error, WCNOC compared subsections NA and NC of the Summer 1974 Addendum with the corresponding subsections of the Summer 1975 Addendum, including a specific review of paragraph NC-2127, which was referenced in the relief request and specifies the ASME Section III requirements for the bolting material. The licensee identified no differences in paragraph NC-2127 between the Summer 1974 and Summer 1975 Addenda, and no differences in the corresponding NA and NC paragraphs that would have any impact on the approved relief request.

The NRC staff has reviewed the licensee's letter dated March 3, 2011, and has confirmed that the erroneous reference to the Summer 1975 Addendum does not change the staffs previous conclusions in authorizing the proposed alternative to allow the use of the specified hydraulic nuts for the replacement of the bolting for the Excess Letdown Heat Exchanger at WCGS. The enclosed NRC safety evaluation has been revised to reflect the correct Construction Code

M. Sunseri

-2 reference to ASME Section III, 1974 Edition including Summer 1974 Addendum, and supersedes the previous safety evaluation dated November 18, 2010. The NRC staff confirms its conclusion that the proposed alternative to Code Case N-579 stated in licensee's request for relief provides an acceptable level of quality and safety. Therefore, the proposed alternative is authorized pursuant to paragraph 50.55a(a)(3)(i) of Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations for the third 1 O-year inservice inspection interval of WCGS. All other ASME Code,Section XI requirements for which relief was not specifically requested and approved in this relief request remain applicable, including third-party review by the Authorized Nuclear Inservice Inspector.

If you have any questions regarding this action, please contact Mr. Randy Hall at (301) 415-4032.

Sincerely,

~M~d 7JJ1 r r9c~ael T. Markley, Chief

"'~Iant Licensing Branch IV Division of Operating Reactor Licensing Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation Docket No. 50-482 Enclosure As stated cc w/encl: Distribution via Listserv

UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION WASHINGTON, D.C. 20555-0001 REVISED SAFETY EVALUATION BY THE OFFICE OF NUCLEAR REACTOR REGULATION REQUEST FOR RELIEF ON USE OF NONSTANDARD HYDRAULIC NUTS ON THE EXCESS LETDOWN HEAT EXCHANGER DURING THIRD 10-YEAR INSERVICE INSPECTION INTERVAL WOLF CREEK GENERATING STATION WOLF CREEK NUCLEAR OPERATING CORPORATION DOCKET NO. 50-482

1.0 INTRODUCTION

By letter dated June 10, 2010 (Agencywide Documents Access and Management System (ADAMS) Accession No. ML101730557), Wolf Creek Nuclear Operating Corporation (the licensee) proposed an alternative to the requirements of the American Society of Mechanical Engineers Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code (ASME Code),Section III, Code Case N-579, "Use of Nonstandard Nuts, Class 1, 2, and 3, MC, CS Components and Supports Construction,Section III, Division 1." The licensee plans to replace the channel head flange bolting of the Excess Letdown Heat Exchanger under the ASME Code,Section XI in the third 10-year inservice inspection (lSI) interval during refueling outage number 18 at Wolf Creek Generating Station (WCGS). Code Case N-579 has been approved by the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) and is documented in NRC Regulatory Guide 1.84, "DeSign, Fabrication, and Materials Code Case Acceptability, ASME Section III," Revision 35, dated October 2010.

The licensee has requested relief from use of the material specified in Code Case N-579 for the hydraulic nuts and conformance of thread configuration to ASME 81.1. 8y letter dated March 3, 2011 (ADAMS Accession No. ML110740436), the licensee notified the NRC of an incorrect reference to the Construction Code applicable to the Excess Letdown Heat Exchanger; the correct reference should be the ASME Section III, 1974 Edition including Summer 1974 Addendum. Section 3.1 of this safety evaluation is revised to reflect that correction, and this safety evaluation supersedes the safety evaluation issued on November 18, 2010 (ADAMS Accession No. ML102990132).

2.0 REGULATORY EVALUATION

The lSI of the ASME Code Class 1, 2, and 3 components is to be performed in accordance with Section XI of the ASME Code and applicable addenda as required by Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations (10 CFR) 50.55a(g), "Inservice inspection requirements," except where Enclosure

- 2 specific written relief has been granted by the Commission pursuant to 10 CFR 50. 55a(g)(6)(i).

The regulations in 10 CFR 50.55a(a)(3) state that alternatives to the requirements of paragraph (g) may be used, when authorized by the NRC, if the licensee demonstrates that (i) the proposed alternatives would provide an acceptable level of quality and safety, or (ii) compliance with the specified requirements would result in hardship or unusual difficulty without a compensating increase in the level of quality and safety.

Pursuant to 10 CFR 50.55a(g)(4), ASME Code Class 1,2, and 3 components (including supports) shall meet the requirements, except the design and access provisions and the preservice examination requirements, set forth in the ASME Code,Section XI, "Rules for Inservice Inspection of Nuclear Power Plant Components," to the extent practical within the limitations of design, geometry, and materials of construction of the components. The regulations require that inservice examination of components and system pressure tests conducted during the first 10-year interval and subsequent intervals comply with the requirements in the latest edition and addenda of Section XI of the ASME Code incorporated by reference in 10 CFR 50.55a(b) 12 months prior to the start of the 120-month interval, subject to the limitations and modifications listed therein. The applicable lSI Code of record for the third 10-year lSI interval of WCGS is the 1998 Edition through the 2000 Addenda of the ASME Code,Section XI.

3.0 TECHNICAL EVALUATION

3.1 Applicable Code Edition and Addenda (as stated by the licensee)

The bolting replacement will be performed as a repair/replacement activity under the jurisdiction of the ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code,Section XI. The 1998 Edition through the 2000 Addenda is the applicable Section XI edition and addenda for Wolf Creek Nuclear Operating Corporation's (WCNOC's) third inservice inspection interval.Section XI IWA-4000 requires use of portions of the original Construction Code and allows use of Construction Code, Code Cases.

For the Excess Letdown Heat Exchanger, the applicable Construction Code is ASME Section III, 1974 Edition including Summer 1974 Addendum.

Code Case N-579, "Use of Nonstandard Nuts, Class 1, 2, and 3, MC, CS Components and Supports Construction Section III, Division 1," is approved for use by the [NRC] as documented in Regulatory Guide 1.84, "Design, Fabrication, and Materials Code Case Acceptability, ASME Section III," Revision [35], dated October [2007].

3.2 System/Component(s) for Which Relief is Requested (as stated by the licensee)

The Excess Letdown Heat Exchanger (EBG02) channel head joint flange replacement bolting (ASME Class 2).

3.3 Code Relief Request (as stated by the licensee)

Relief is requested from the ASME Section XI repair/replacement activity requirements for the replacement bolting in accordance with Code Case N-579.

- 3 The specific requirements in Code Case N-579 for which relief is requested are the use of SA-194 material specified in Code Case N-579 for the nonstandard hydraulic nuts and conformance of thread configuration to ASME 81.1.

3.4 Proposed Alternative (as stated by the licensee)

SA-540 Grade 823 material meeting the requirements for bolting material in

[ASME] Section III, paragraph NC-2127(a), will be used to fabricate the hydraulic nuts for the excess letdown heat exchanger flange instead of the SA-194 material specified in Code Case N-579. No torque wrench is required for installation of bolting since HydraNuts employ a stud tensioning process that tensions all twelve (12) studs simultaneously. The hydraulic nuts will incorporate a proprietary outside thread design providing minimized thread deflection to maximize retained load and anow lower preload to be used in contrast to standard threads manufactured in accordance with ASME 81.1.

... While the inside threads of the hydraulic nuts conform to ASME 81.1, the outside threads have a proprietary thread design developed by the vendor, Nova-Technofast, which minimizes thread deflection between the nut and lock ring and thereby minimizes loss of pre-load.

3.5 8asis for Alternative (as stated by the licensee)

Use of [ASME] Section III approved SA-540 Grade 823 material in lieu of SA-194 material specified in Code Case N-579 will assure adequate strength in the joint.

The special thread design of the outside threads of the hydraulic nuts minimizes thread deflection and loss of preload. Use of these nonstandard nuts is expected to eliminate leakage from the joint while reducing radiation exposure to maintenance personnel by reducing maintenance time in the area.

3.6

NRC Staff Evaluation

The NRC staff has reviewed the information related to the request for relief from Code Case N-579 for replacement of bolting in the channel head joint flange of the Excess Letdown Heat Exchanger. The component is located in a high-radiation area in the vicinity of reactor coolant loop 4 inside the secondary shield wall of the reactor building. The Excess Letdown Heat Exchanger flange has had chronic boric acid leakage at various times. Prior efforts to stop the leakage by replacement of the gasket along with adjustment of bolt torque have not been successful and have exposed maintenance personnel to increased occupational radiation exposure. Typical joint design incorporates a tapered geometry and a series of spacer washers that are difficult to maintain. The joint is being redesigned to eliminate the tapered geometry and spacer washer configuration with the use of hydraulic tensioning nuts (HydraNuts) to assure consistent loading around the jOint. The new design would provide a safety benefit in reducing occupational radiation exposure by limiting maintenance stay times in the area.

As an alternative to Code Case N-579, SA-540 Grade 823 material was used instead of SA-194 for the manufacture of the hydraulic nuts. The licensee has determined that SA-540 Grade 823 material has sufficient strength for this application. The NRC staff concludes that SA-540

- 4 Grade B23 is acceptable for this application because this material is listed as an acceptable material for Class 2 bolting in ASME Code,Section III.

Code Case N-S79 requires that the screw threads of nonstandard nuts be manufactured to meet the requirements for threads in ASME B1.1. The hydraulic nuts used by the licensee have a proprietary outside thread design developed by the nut manufacturer which minimizes thread deflection between the nut and the lock ring and thereby minimizes loss of preload. The inside threads of the hydraulic nuts conform to ASME B1.1. The NRC staff concludes the use of the proprietary outside thread design is acceptable because the design would result in minimizing thread deflection between the nut and the lock ring, which would result in reducing the loss of preload.

Therefore, the NRC staff concludes that the use of hydraulic nonstandard nuts provides an equivalent level of quality and safety pursuant to 10 CFR SO.SSa(a)(3)(i).

4.0 CONCLUSION

Based on the above evaluation, the NRC staff concludes that the proposed alternative to Code Case N-S79 stated in licensee's request for relief provides an acceptable level of quality and safety. Therefore, the proposed alternative is authorized pursuant to 10 CFR SO.SSa(a)(3)(i) for the third 10-year lSI interval of WCGS. All other requirements of the ASME Code,Section XI for which relief has not been specifically requested remain applicable, including a third-party review by the Authorized Nuclear Inservice Inspector.

Principal Contributor: Pat Patnaik Date: March 21, 2011

ML110750069 E

NRR/LPL4/PM NRR/LPL4/LA DCIICPNB/BC RHall BSingal for JBurkhardt TLupold 3/21/11 3/18/11 3/17111 NRR/LPL4/BC MMarkley JRHall for 3/21/11

_ ____~==~~=..,._~.~~==~~~~=~~~~~.=dJ