ML110390437
| ML110390437 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | LaSalle  |
| Issue date: | 02/10/2011 |
| From: | Ellen Brown Plant Licensing Branch III |
| To: | Pacilio M Exelon Nuclear |
| Brown Eva, NRR/DORL, 415-2315 | |
| References | |
| TAC ME3801, TAC ME3802 | |
| Download: ML110390437 (3) | |
Text
{{#Wiki_filter:UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION WASHINGTON, D.C. 20555..(1001 February 10, 2011 Mr. Michael J. Pacilio President and Chief Nuclear Officer Exelon Nuclear 4300 Winfield Road Warrenville, IL 60555
SUBJECT:
LASALLE COUNTY STATION UNITS 1 AND 2 - REQUEST FOR WITHHOLDING PROPRIETARY INFORMATION FROM PUBLIC DISCLOSURE (TAC NOS. ME3801 AND ME3802)(RS-10-080)
Dear Mr. Pacilio,
By letter dated April 19, 2010, Exelon Generation Company, LLC submitted an affidavit dated October 13,2010, executed by James Harrison on behalf of GE-Hitachi Nuclear Energy Americas LLC (GEH), requesting that information contained in Attachment 2 of the Exelon letter dated October 15, 2010, entitled GEH Letter No. 7491-1-2JBAHO-HAO-1 R1, Transmittal of GEH Comments on LaSalle P-T RAls" be withheld from public disclosure pursuant to Title 1 0 of the Code ofFederal Regulations (10 CFR) Section 2.390. Non-proprietary copies of these documents have been placed in the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) Public Document Room and added to the Agencywide Documents Access and Management System (ADAMS) Public Electronic Reading Room. The affidavit stated that the submitted information should be considered exempt from mandatory public disclosure for the following reasons: (a) Information that discloses a process, method, or apparatus, including supporting data and analyses, where prevention of its use by GEH's competitors without license from GEH constitutes a competitive economic advantage over GEH and/ or other companies;
- and, (b)
Information that, if used by a competitor, would reduce his expenditure of resources or improve their competitive position in the design, manufacture, shipment, installation, assurance of quality, or licensing of a similar product. We have reviewed your application and the material in accordance with the requirements of 10 CFR 2.390 and, on the basis of your statements, have determined that the submitted information sought to be withheld contains proprietary commercial information and should be withheld from public disclosure. Therefore, the version of the submitted information marked as proprietary will be withheld from public disclosure pursuant to 10 CFR 2.390(b)(5) and Section 103(b) of the Atomic Energy Act of 1954, as amended.
M. Pacilio - 2 Withholding from public inspection shall not affect the right, if any, of persons properly and directly concerned to inspect the documents. If the need arises, we may send copies of this information to our consultants working in this area. We will, of course, ensure that the consultants have signed the appropriate agreements for handling proprietary information. If the basis for withholding this information from public inspection should change in the future, such that the information could then be made available for public inspection, you should promptly notify the NRC. You also should understand that the NRC may have cause to review this determination in the future, for example, if the scope of a Freedom of Information Act request includes your information. In all review situations, if the NRC makes a determination adverse to the above, you will be notified in advance of any public disclosure. If you have any questions regarding this matter, I may be reached at 301-415-2315. Sincerely, IRA! Eva A. Brown, Senior Project Manager Plant Licensing Branch 111-2 Division of Operating Reactor Licensing Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation Docket Nos. 50-373 and 50-374 cc: Distribution via Listserv
M. Pacilio - 2 Withholding from public inspection shall not affect the right, if any, of persons properly and directly concerned to inspect the documents. If the need arises, we may send copies of this information to our conSUltants working in this area. We will, of course, ensure that the consultants have signed the appropriate agreements for handling proprietary information. If the basis for withholding this information from public inspection should change in the future, such that the information could then be made available for public inspection, you should promptly notify the NRC. You also should understand that the NRC may have cause to review this determination in the future, for example, if the scope of a Freedom of Information Act request includes your information. In all review situations, if the NRC makes a determination adverse to the above, you will be notified in advance of any public disclosure. If you have any questions regarding this matter, I may be reached at 301-415-2315. Sincerely, IRA! Eva A. Brown, Senior Project Manager Plant Licensing Branch 111-2 Division of Operating Reactor Licensing Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation Docket Nos. 50-373 and 50-374 cc: Distribution via Listserv DISTRIBUTION: PUBLIC LPL3-2 RlF RidsNrrDorlLpl3-2 Resource RidsNrrPMLaSalie Resource RidsNrrLASRohrer Resource RidsAcrsAcnw_MailCTR Resource RidsOgcRp Resource RidsRgn3MailCenter Resource RidsNrrDorlDpr Resource ADAMS Accession No. ML110390437 NRR-084
=====T==========91 OFFICE LPL3-21 3-2/LA LPL3-2/BC NAME EBrown SRohrer RCarlson 2110/11 2/9/11 2/10/11 OFFICIAL RECORD COpy}}