ML110340343
| ML110340343 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Pilgrim |
| Issue date: | 02/02/2011 |
| From: | Chin R, Lampert M Pilgrim Watch, Town of Duxbury, MA, Nuclear Advisory Committee |
| To: | Borchardt R NRC/EDO, Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation |
| References | |
| G20110084, OEDO-2011-0100 | |
| Download: ML110340343 (6) | |
Text
EDO Principal Correspondence Control FROM:
DUE: 03/03/11 EDO CONTROL: G20110084 DOC DT: 02/02/11 FINAL REPLY:
Mary Lampert Pilgrim Watch Rebecca Chin Town of Duxbury Nuclear Advisory Committee TO:
Borchardt, EDO FOR SIGNATURE OF :
GRN CRC NO:.
- Leeds, NRR DESC:
ROUTING:
Pilgrim Watch Request Regarding PRB's Decision Hold Pilgrim Watch's 2.206 Petition Concerns Related to Inaccessible Cables will be Held in Abeyance (EDATS: OEDO-2011-0100)
DATE: 02/03/11 to Borchardt Weber Virgilio Ash Muessle OGC/GC
- Dean, RI
- Burns, OGC
NRR CONTACT:
Leeds SPECIAL INSTRUCTIONS OR REMARKS:
Ref. G20100454, G20100527, G20100689.
" ýOje -. eto -00 ý
~eA iiTho -0
EDATS Number: OEDO-201 1-0100 Source: OEDO Geal Inrmati Assigned To: NRR OEDO Due Date: 3/3/2011 11:00 PM Other Assignees:
SECY Due Date: NONE
Subject:
Pilgrim Watch Request Regarding PRB's Decision to Hold Pilgrim Watch's 2.206 Petition Concerns Related to Inaccessible Cables Will be Held in Abeyance
==
Description:==
CC Routing: RegionI; OGC; Tanya.Mensah@nrc.gov; Catherine.Scott@nrc.gov ADAMS Accession Numbers -
Incoming: NONE Response/Package: NONE Ote Inforatio Cross Reference Number: G20110084 Related Task:
File Routing: EDATS Staff Initiated: NO Recurring Item: NO Agency Lesson Learned: NO OEDO Monthly Report Item: NO I, Prcs Inor aio I
Action Type: Letter Signature Level: NRR Approval Level: No Approval Required OEDO Concurrence: NO OCM Concurrence: NO OCA Concurrence: NO Special Instructions: Ref. G20100454, G20100527, G20100689.
Priority: Medium Sensitivity: None Urgency: NO Originator Name: Mary Lampert and Rebecca Chin Date of Incoming: 2/2/2011 Originating Organization: Pilgrim Watch,Town of Document Received by OEDO Date: 2/2/2011 Duxbury Nuclear Advisory Committee Addressee: R. W. Borchardt, EDO Date Response Requested by Originator: NONE Incoming Task Received: Letter Page 1 of l
February 2, 2011 Executive Director for Operations U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555-0001 Via Mail: Office of Secretary Via Email hearingdocket a.nrc.gov PILGRIM WATCH REQUEST REGARDING PRB'S DECISION TO HOLD PILGRIM WATCH'S 2.206 PETITION CONCERNS RELATED TO INACCESSIBLE CABLES IN ABEYANCE (JANUARY 4, 2011)
Pilgrim Watch filed Pilgrim Watch 2.206 Petition Regarding Inadequacy of Entergy's Management of Non-Environmentally Qualified Inaccessible Cables & Wiring at Pilgrim Station, July 19, 2010 and a Supplement, August 6, 2010. We were subsequently informed that the petition was accepted and would be placed on the Federal Register.
In the interim Pilgrim Watch, a party to Entergy's License Renewal Application for Pilgrim Station's adjudication procedure filed a Request for a New Hearing regarding Inaccessible Non-EQ Cables (December 13, 2010).
We were informed by Richard Guzman that the PRB determined (January 4, 2011) that due to Pilgrim Watch's 12/13/10 filing of a license renewal contention on Inaccessible Non-EQ cables, that Pilgrim Watch's 2.206 petition concerns related to inaccessible cables will be held in abeyance until an outcome of the contention is made under the Pilgrim license renewal hearing process.
Pilgrim Watch believes that there is a very clear distinction between current operating issues of the plant that occur before Pilgrim's 4 0 th birthday, a present safety concern, and
Pilgrim Watch's contentions' in Pilgrim's license renewal application that deal with the sufficiency of the Aging Management Program going forward from 2012 to 2032.
In summary, we understand that the 2.206 process addresses present safety concerns; and the license renewal adjudication process addresses future safety concerns, specifically the adequacy of the AMP. Pilgrim Watch believes it would be appropriate to have a teleconference with the PRB to discuss this distinction.
The second issue of concern is that Pilgrim Watch does not believe that under NRC regulations that Intervenors in the license renewal process automatically surrender their rights to redress on current operating safety issues. If there is such a regulation, we would appreciate your providing a copy or citation to us.
We appreciate your consideration and look forward to your response.
Respectfully Submitted, Mary lampert Pilgrim Watch, Director 148 Washington Street Duxbury, MA 02332 781-934-0389 Mary.lampert@comcast.net Rebecca Chin Town of Duxbury Nuclear Advisory Committee 31 Deerpath Trail North Duxbury, MA 02332 781-837-0009 Pilgrim Watch Request New Hearing-Inaccessible Non-EQ Cables, December 13, 2010; Pilgrim Watch New Hearing-Inaccessible Non-EQ Cables, January 31, 2011 2
Jaegers, Cathy From:
Sent:
To:
Cc:
Subject:
Attachments:
Mary Lampert [mary. lampert@comcast. net]
Wednesday, February 02, 2011 3:29 PM Docket, Hearing Guzman, Richard; Paul Blanch; Barbara Pye; Becky Chin; Dan Ryan (DNAC); Henry Chang; Janet Francis; Lee Hutchinson; Nancy Landgren PW Request to PRB Regarding Postponement PW Request to PRB Regarding Postponement 02.02.11.pdf Hello:
Please find PILGRIM WATCH REQUEST REGARDING PRB'S DECISION TO HOLD PILGRIM WATCH'S 2.206 PETITION CONCERNS RELATED TO INACCESSIBLE CABLES WILL BE HELD IN ABEYANCE (JANUARY 4,2011).
If you have any difficulty opening the file, please call Mary Lampert at 781-934-0389.
Thank-you and have a good evening.
Mary I
Received: from mail2.nrc.gov (148.184.176.43) by TWMS01.nrc.gov (148.184.200.145) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 8.2.247.2; Wed, 2 Feb 2011 15:29:26 -0500 X-Ironport-ID: mail2 X-SBRS: 4.5 X-MID: 33584875 X-fn: PW Request to PRB Regarding Postponement 02.02.11.pdf X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.60,415,1291611600";
d="pdf'?scan'208,217";a="33584875" Received: from qmta02.westchester. pa.mail.comcast. net ([76.96.62.24]) by mail2.nrc.gov with ESMTP; 02 Feb 2011 15:29:21 -0500 Received: from omta24.westchester. pa. mail.comcast. net ([76.96.62.76])
by qmta02.westchester. pa. mail. comcast. net with comcast id 38SC1g0091 ei Bg528VLJO; Wed, 02 Feb 2011 20:29:20 +0000 Received: from MaryXPS ([75.67.93.158])
by omta24.westchester. pa. mail.comcast. net with comcast id 38VG1gOOL3ROXA33k8VHvX; Wed, 02 Feb 2011 20:29:19 +0000 From: Mary Lampert <mary.lampert@comcast.net>
To: "SECY Hearing Doc\\(NRC\\)" <hearingdocket@nrc.gov>
CC: "Guzman, Richard" <Richard.Guzman@nrc.gov>,
"Paul Blanch" <pmblanch@comcast.net>,
"Barbara Pye" <bapye@msn.com>,
"Becky Chin" <rebeccajchin@hotmail.com>,
"Dan Ryan \\(DNAC\\)" <dr.dan.ryan@gmail.com>,
"Henry Chang" <tigrchang@comcast.net>,
"Janet Francis" <francis.janet@gmail. com>,
"Lee Hutchinson" <lahutchinson@yahoo.com>,
"Nancy Landgren" <clarkland@verizon. net>
Subject:
PW Request to PRB Regarding Postponement Date: Wed, 2 Feb 2011 15:28:55 -0500 Message-ID: <00b501 cbc3l 7$d 1 bfc06O$753f41 20$@Iampert@comcast. net>
MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_00B6_01CBC2ED.E8E9B860" X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 12.0 Thread-Index: AcvDF9AYKxj6n4M1TUKqJpKe4RBu/w==
Content-Language: en-us Return-Path: mary.lampert@comcast. net