|
---|
Category:General FR Notice Comment Letter
MONTHYEARML24009A0372023-12-13013 December 2023 Comment (2) of Bruce Montgomery on Draft DUWP-ISG-02, Radiological Survey and Dose Modeling of the Subsurface to Support License Termination ML23353A2442023-12-13013 December 2023 Comment (2) of Bruce Montgomery on Interim Staff Guidance on Subsurface Investigations, Radiological Survey and Dose Modeling of the Subsurface to Support License Termination ML23348A0732023-12-11011 December 2023 Comment (2) of Charlotte Shields on Behalf of Nuclear Energy Institute on Draft Regulatory Guide: Physical Security Event Notifications, Reports, and Records ML23348A0772023-12-11011 December 2023 Comment (1) of Charlotte Shields on Behalf of Nuclear Energy Institute on Draft Regulatory Guide: Preemption Authority, Enhanced Weapons Authority, and Firearms Background Checks ML23349A0442023-12-11011 December 2023 Comment (1) of Charlotte Shields on Draft Regulatory Guide: Suspicious Activity Reports ML23326A1172023-11-21021 November 2023 Comment (1) of Alan Campbell on Proposed Revision to Standard Review Plan Branch Technical Position 7-19, Guidance for Evaluation of Defense-In-Depth and Diversity to Address Common-Cause Failure Due to Latent Design Defects in Digital Safe ML23326A0312023-11-17017 November 2023 Comment (2) of Kati R. Austgen on Draft Regulatory Guide: General Site Suitability Criteria for Nuclear Power Stations ML23284A3892023-10-10010 October 2023 Comment (8) of Ben Holtzman on Guidance for a Technology-Inclusive Content of Application Methodology to Inform the Licensing Basis and Content of Applications for Licenses, Certifications, and Approvals for Advanced Reactors ML23270B9552023-09-27027 September 2023 Comment (2) of Stewart Yuen on Proposed Revision to Standard Review Plan Section 15.0, Introduction - Transient and Accident Analyses ML23242A0412023-08-25025 August 2023 Comment (2) of Brett Titus on Behalf of NEI on Draft NUREG: Revision to Subsequent License Renewal Guidance Documents, and Supplement to Associated Technical Bases Document ML23236A5292023-08-21021 August 2023 Comment (6) of Bruce S. Montgomery on Draft Interim Staff Guidance: Use of the Decommissioning Trust Fund During Operations for Major Radioactive Component Disposal ML23256A1122023-08-10010 August 2023 Comment (3) of Ben Holtzman on Review of Risk-Informed, Technology Inclusive Advanced Reactor Applications - Roadmap ML23256A1132023-08-10010 August 2023 Comment (4) of Ben Holtzman on Review of Risk-Informed, Technology Inclusive Advanced Reactor Applications - Roadmap ML23256A1152023-08-10010 August 2023 Comment (2) of Ben Holtzman on Review of Risk-Informed, Technology Inclusive Advanced Reactor Applications - Roadmap ML23256A1162023-08-10010 August 2023 Comment (1) of Ben Holtzman on Review of Risk-Informed, Technology Inclusive Advanced Reactor Applications - Roadmap ML23256A1192023-08-10010 August 2023 Comment (4) of Ben Holtzman on Review of Risk-Informed, Technology Inclusive Advanced Reactor Applications - Roadmap ML23256A1202023-08-10010 August 2023 Comment (2) of Ben Holtzman on Behalf of Nuclear Energy Institute on Draft Interim Staff Guidance: Review of Risk-Informed, Technology Inclusive Advanced Reactor Applications-Roadmap ML23256A1222023-08-10010 August 2023 Comment (5) of Ben Holtzman on Review of Risk-Informed, Technology Inclusive Advanced Reactor Applications - Roadmap ML23256A1232023-08-10010 August 2023 Comment (4) of Ben Holtzman on Review of Risk-Informed, Technology Inclusive Advanced Reactor Applications - Roadmap ML23256A1252023-08-10010 August 2023 Comment (4) of Ben Holtzman on Behalf of Nuclear Energy Institute on Draft Interim Staff Guidance: Review of Risk-Informed, Technology Inclusive Advanced Reactor Applicationsroadmap ML23234A0392023-08-10010 August 2023 Comment (4) of Ben Holtzman on Review of Risk-Informed, Technology Inclusive Advanced Reactor Applications - Roadmap ML23181A0292023-06-29029 June 2023 Comment (2) of Rod Mccullum on Draft Regulatory Guide: Weather-Related Administrative Controls at Independent Spent Fuel Storage Installations ML23174A0492023-06-16016 June 2023 Comment (2) of Ben Holtzman on Behalf of Nuclear Energy Institute on Draft Interim Staff Guidance: Review of Risk-Informed, Technology Inclusive Advanced Reactor Applicationsroadmap ML23158A2162023-06-0202 June 2023 Comment (2) of Alan Campbell on Draft Regulatory Guide: Guidelines for Lightning Protection for Production and Utilization Facilities ML23159A2472023-05-22022 May 2023 Comment (4) of William Gross on Perimeter Intrusion Alarm Systems ML23143A1982023-05-18018 May 2023 Comment (1) of Richard Mogavero on Behalf of Nuclear Energy Institute on Draft Regulatory Guide: Cybersecurity Event Notifications ML23130A2082023-05-0808 May 2023 Comment (9) of Mark A. Richter on Behalf of Nuclear Energy Institute on Material Compatibility for Non-Light Water Reactors ML23115A0152023-04-0707 April 2023 Comment (1) of Alan Campbell on Draft Regulatory Guide: Criteria for Programmable Digital Devices in Safety-Related Systems of Nuclear Power Plants ML23089A0012023-03-28028 March 2023 OMB 3150-0035, NEI Comment on 10 CFR Part 21 Information Collection Renewal 2023 ML23094A0632023-03-28028 March 2023 NRC-2022-0145- NEI Official Comment Attachment on 10 CFR Part 21 Information Collection Renewal ML23115A0172023-03-23023 March 2023 Comment (3) of Alan Campbell on Draft Regulatory Guide: Criteria for Programmable Digital Devices in Safety-Related Systems of Nuclear Power Plants ML23074A0472023-03-14014 March 2023 Comment (2) of A. J. Clore on Perimeter Intrusion Alarm Systems ML22354A2422022-12-19019 December 2022 Comment (4) of Thomas Basso on Behalf of Nuclear Energy Institute on Performance-Based Containment Leak Test Program ML23005A2412022-12-16016 December 2022 Comment (1) of Janet R. Schlueter on Report on Waste Burial Charges: Changes in Decommissioning Waste Disposal Costs at Low-Level Waste Burial Facilities ML22244A1732022-08-31031 August 2022 Comment (1) of Tony Brown on Behalf of Nuclear Energy Institute on Industry Comments on Draft Appendices to NUREG/BR-0058, Revision 5, Regulatory Analysis Guidelines of the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission ML22242A0302022-08-29029 August 2022 Comment (1) of Victoria K. Anderson on High Energy Arcing Fault Hazard Frequency and Consequence Modeling ML22231B0532022-08-19019 August 2022 Comment (6) of James E. Slider on Nrc'S Fiscal Years 2023-2027 Artificial Intelligence Strategic Plan ML22230A0402022-08-15015 August 2022 Comment (4) of William R. Gross on Behalf of NEI on Update of Facility Security Clearance ML22224A1942022-08-12012 August 2022 Comment (1) of William R. Gross on Behalf of Nuclear Energy Institute on Personnel Access Authorization Requirements for Non-Immigrant Foreign Nationals Working at Nuclear Power Plants ML22174A0722022-06-21021 June 2022 Comment (11) of Frances A. Pimentel on Alternative Radiological Source Terms for Evaluating Design Basis Accidents at Nuclear Power Plants ML22174A3422022-06-21021 June 2022 Comment (2) of Victoria K. Anderson on Level 3 PRA Project Documentation (Volume 3x) ML22165A2082022-06-13013 June 2022 Comment (2) of Victoria K. Anderson on Draft Research Information Letter Reports Determining the Zone of Influence for High Energy Arcing Faults Using Fire Dynamics Simulator, and Predicting High Energy Arcing Fault Zones of Influence for ML22145A2992022-05-23023 May 2022 Comment (2) of Victoria K. Anderson on Acceptability of Probabilistic Risk Assessment Results for Advanced Non-Light Water Reactor Risk-Informed Activities ML22152A0632022-05-23023 May 2022 Comment (1) of Kati R. Austgen on Safety Review of Light-Water Reactor Construction Permit Applications ML22124A0812022-05-0202 May 2022 Comment (3) of Richard Mogavero on Cyber Security Programs for Nuclear Power Reactors ML22124A0792022-05-0202 May 2022 Comment (2) of Richard Mogavero on Cyber Security Programs for Nuclear Power Reactors 2023-09-27
[Table view] |
Text
...Ri,., Ui ,; -,
i-.L*: --, ,
,,,,r,-,,* i 1*l EK I t
NUCLEAR ENERGY INSTITUTE Leslie Compton Kass R *'_ ?*_i! _ Senior Director, Business Policy &Programs December 22, 2010 //,4>4/o29/2)
Ms. Cindy Bladey, Chief Rules, Directives and Announcements Branch Division of Administrative Services Office of Administration U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Mail Stop TWB-05-B01M Washington, DC 20555-0001
Subject:
Comments on Proposed Regulatory Information Summary - "Reporting for Decommissioning Funding Status Reports - Decommissioning Funding Calculations" (75 Fed. Reg. 72,737, November 26, 2010)
Project Number 689
Dear Ms. Bladey:
The Nuclear Energy Institute (NEI), 1 on behalf of the nuclear energy industry, is pleased to provide comments on the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission's (NRC) proposed regulatory information summary (RIS) regarding communications reporting for decommissioning funding status reports. We appreciate the NRC's efforts to ensure the reporting system is efficient.
During industry review we identified an issue regarding end-of-life funding calculations that requires revision of NRC's proposed language, as described below.
NRC regulations provide for the application of a 2 percent real rate of return, unless another amount has been authorized by the rate-setting authority, to decommissioning funds both during plant operation, and following plant shutdown (see 10 C.F.R. §§ 50.75 (e)(1)(i) and (ii)).
The regulations do not define the precise method of applying the real rate of return either during plant operation or following plant shutdown. The NRC has, however, provided general guidance on application of the real rate of return (for purposes of NRC Staff review), in LIC-205, 1 NEI is the organization responsible for establishing unified nuclear industry policy on matters affecting the nuclear energy industry. NEI's members include all utilities licensed to operate commercial nuclear power plants in the United States, nuclear plant designers, major architect/engineering firms, fuel fabrication facilities, nuclear material licensees, and other organizations and individuals involved in the nuclear energy industry. Ž * --
/17761Street, NW I Suite 400 I Washington, DC I 20006-3708 I P: 202.739.8115 I F: 202.785.4019 I www.nei.org
Ms. Cindy Bladey December 22, 2010 Page 2 of 3 "Procedures for NRC's Independent Analysis of Decommissioning Funding Assurance for Operating Nuclear Power Reactors," Revision 3, March 8, 2010.
The methodology described in LIC-205 for calculating earnings following plant shutdown (i.e.,
the immediate dismantlement [DECON] option) assumes the licensee will withdraw funds for decommissioning on an even drawdown basis throughout the 7-year period of active decommissioning. Thus, for the assumed 7-year DECON period, LIC-205 simplifies the earnings calculation by applying the 2 percent real rate of return to a 31/2 year period (LIC-205, Rev. 3, at p. 9). This methodology implies, and is equivalent to, the assumption that withdrawals during decommissioning - i.e., following plant shutdown - occur at the mid-point of each year during the period of active decommissioning. LIC-205 indicates further that the 31/2-year period may be longer "if a licensee has declared and documented additional years into decommissioning based upon a site-specific study" (LIC-205 at p. 9).
The proposed RIS, however, limits use of the LIC-205 guidance to calculating earnings during plantoperation. 75 Fed.Reg. 72,738, col. 3. The proposed RIS deviates from longstanding guidance and practice, and establishes a different methodology for the decommissioning period.
Specifically, in contrast to the guidance provided in LIC-205, the RIS suggests that licensees should assume that any costs incurred during the decommissioning period (whether during DECON or SAFSTOR) will be withdrawn at the beginning of the year in which they are incurred.
This proposed methodology is a new position and is unrealistic in light of power reactor decommissioning experience.
Specifically, power reactor decommissioning experience has demonstrated that withdrawals to pay for expenses incurred in any given year of decommissioning are never made solely at the beginning the year; rather, they are made over the course of the year as they are incurred.
Although the LIC-205 assumption regarding pro rata,mid-year distributions over a 7-year DECON period is a simplification of distributions actually made from any given trust, it is a reasonable, conservativeassumption given the long term predictive nature of decommissioning funding estimates; the reality that funds are typically not withdrawn solely at the beginning or end of any given year; and that independent third-party decommissioning cost estimates for DECON typically result in lower present value costs than predicted by the NRC's minimum funding assurance calculations contained in 10 C.F.R. § 50.75.
Thus, NEI recommends that the paragraph of the proposed RIS describing application of the 2 percent real rate of return be revised to read:
"The detailed site-specific study should have a year-by-year cost breakdown combined with the overnight cost (cost without inflation or cost escalation) of decommissioning the plant using constant dollars for the year reported. The NRC staff evaluates the site-specific method, using the f.llowing steps: (1) Applying the.. eurr.nt F^vis..n ef NRR !.
LIC 205 to ealreulate thc growh ef the fund during opeatiens, (2) for eaeh Year duiring deeeammissiening, (a) SUbtraceting the annual cost to be ineurrcd and than (b) providing a 2 percont roal Fate ef roturn1, unless a higher Fate of rotur n has boeen allewed, and (3)
Fcpeating step (2) fer each yoar of the deeeommis ioning poid until eithor the deee0m nissiening period is eempleted or the DTF if deplotod applying the approach described in the most recent revision of NRR 01 LIC-205."
Ms. Cindy Bladey December 22, 2010 Page 3 of 3 We appreciate the opportunity to comment on the proposed RIS. If you have any questions, please contact me at 202-739-8115 or email Ick@nei.org.
Sincerely, Leslie C. Kass c: Mr. Aaron Szabo, RES/DE/RGDB, NRC