ML110050389

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
TVA Voluntary Response to RIS 2010-01, Clinch River Site
ML110050389
Person / Time
Site: PROJ0785
Issue date: 12/30/2010
From: Bailey J A
Tennessee Valley Authority
To:
Document Control Desk, Office of New Reactors
References
RIS 2010-01
Download: ML110050389 (3)


See also: RIS 2010-01

Text

I.Tennessee

Valley Authority, 1 101 Market Street, LP 5A, Chattanooga, Tennessee

37402-2801

December 30, 2010 U.S. Nuclear Regulatory

Commission

ATTN: Document Control Desk Washington, D.C. 20555-0001

In the Matter of ) Clinch River Site Tennessee

Valley Authority)

Project Number 785 TVA VOLUNTARY

RESPONSE TO RIS 2010-01 Referenc6" 1) NRC Regulatory

Issue Summary (RIS) 2010-01, Process for Scheduling

Acceptance

Reviews of New Reactor Licensing

Applications

and Process for Determining

Budget Needs for Fiscal Year 2012.2) TVA letter to NRC dated October 5, 2010, TVA Voluntary

Response to RIS 2010-01 This letter supersedes

the letter submitted

in Reference

2, which provided the TVA voluntary

response to NRC RIS 2010-01 (Reference

1). Since the submittal

of Reference

2, the information

identified

as business proprietary

was made public. TVA is therefore

superseding

the October 5, 2010 letter with a public version containing

the same information.

TVA is providing

this information

solely to assist the NRC in its planning and scheduling

efforts.TVA's voluntary

response to this RIS is provided in Enclosure

1.If you have any questions, please contact Gordon Arent by telephone

at (423) 751-2233, or via email at garent@tva.gov.

Sincerely, -k A.J ABailey V c# President, Nc ar Generation

Development

N~ lear Generation

Development

and Construction

Enclosure cc: See Page 2 I-

A U.S. Nuclear Regulatory

Commission

Page 2 December 30, 2010 cc (w/o Enclosures):

Frank Akstulewicz

U. S. Nuclear Regulatory

Commission

Two White Flint North, 6C34 11545 Rockville

Pike Rockville, Maryland 20852-2738

Michael Johnson U. S. Nuclear Regulatory

Commission

Two White Flint North, 6F15 11545 Rockville

Pike Rockville, Maryland 20852-2738

Eric Leeds U.S. Nuclear Regulatory

Commission

One White Flint North, 7H4 11555 Rockville

Pike Rockville, Maryland 20852-2738

Patrick Milano U. S. Nuclear Regulatory

Commission

One White Flint North, 8C2 11545 Rockville

Pike Rockville, Maryland 20852-2738

Lakshminarasimh

Raghavan U.S. Nuclear Regulatory

Commission

One White Flint North, 08H4A 11555 Rockville

Pike Rockville, Maryland 20852-2738

Luis Reyes U. S. Nuclear Regulatory

Commission

Region II Sam Nunn Atlanta Federal Center 61 Forsyth Street, SW, Suite 23T85 Atlanta, Georgia 30303-8931

Enclosure

1 December 30, 2010 Page 1 Enclosure

1 TVA Voluntary

Response to NRC Regulatory

Issue Summary 2010-01 On February 3, 2010, NRC issued NRC Regulatory

Issue Summary (RIS) 2010-01, "Process for Scheduling

Acceptance

Reviews of New Reactor Licensing

Applications

and Process for Determining

Budget Needs for Fiscal Year 2012." The NRC stated that the intent of the RIS was to provide the NRC with information

to assist in determining

fiscal year (FY) 2012 (October 1, 2011, to September

30, 2012) resource and budget needs with respect to future construction-related

activities

and other anticipated

10 CFR Part 52 licensing

actions. The following

TVA response addresses

anticipated

licensing actions for a Small Modular Reactor (SMR) that will likely impact NRC resource and budget needs.Small Modular Reactor Activities

TVA plans to develop and submit letters addressing

Key Licensing

Assumptions

and a detailed Regulatory

Framework

for one or more SMR modules. The detailed regulatory

framework

would identify the regulatory

requirements

applicable

to licensing

an SMR. Related activities

are anticipated

to occur during FY2011 and continue through FY2012 with the anticipated

submittal

of a construction

permit application

in the fourth quarter of FY2012.While the intent of the RIS is associated

with anticipated

10 CFR Part 52 licensing actions, TVA is evaluating

performing

the SMR licensing

activities

using the 10 CFR Part 50 licensing

process. Use of the 10 CFR Part 50 process would not affect the above described

timeframes.

The activities

described

in this response do not represent

plans to construct

an SMR. TVA has not yet made a decision to construct

an SMR. TVA will notify NRC of any changes to the above descriptions.