ML110041016

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
2009 Mid-Cycle Plant Safety Performance Summary; Plant/Site Name: Indian Point Unit 2; Assessment Period: July 1, 2008 - June 30, 2009
ML110041016
Person / Time
Site: Indian Point Entergy icon.png
Issue date: 06/30/2009
From:
Office of Information Services
To:
References
FOIA/PA-2011-0021
Download: ML110041016 (5)


Text

,**on 2009 Mid-Cycle Plant Safety Performance Summary Plant/Site Name: Indian Point Unit 2 Assessment Period: July 1, 2008 - June 30, 2009 0Outside of Scope record was deleml*--d--,-

hMiWhnIs SwithFthreeFrof k: ioa ntn f aetio-Page 1 of 27 C~37

Outside of Scope (15 Pages)

'~~-v---'-"rp .,.1ILI ~t7Z~s~flv~-

I

/ Outside of Scope u-Condensate Storaqe Tank (CST),Underqround Pipe Leak

Background:

On February 16, 2009, Entergy operators identified and confirmed indications of leakage from a buried pipe under the-auxiliary pump building floor -

associated with the Unit 2 CST return line. Entergy personnel excavated the area, unearthed the pipe, and identified~a 1.5" diameter hole in the pipe. On February 21, 2009, Entergy personnel replaced.the affected pipe section and declared the CST operable in accordance with the time'limits of the applicable technical specification action statement. Resident inspectors independently determined that Entergy personnel identified the leak, replaced the pipe in accordance with regulatory requirements, and confirmed that liquid releases (tritium) were well below NRC regulatory limits.

Entergy completed a root cause evaluation in May2009 and has developed corrective actions. including extent-of-condition inspections to be completed by October 2009. It determined by Entergy personnelithat the external protective coating was degraded in this localized area in part due to installation/backfill specification allowances during initial construction combined with soil environmental conditions at this elevation on site conducive to corrosion mechanisms.

NRC Outreach: The NRC staff communicated to government stakeholders in February 2009 via conference and phone discussions and email correspondence to describe our independent inspections and overall assessment.

  • There were several local media articles published about this condition in February.

Subsequently, the NRC staff received and responded to the following letters:

o March 2009 letter from NY Congressional members (Engel, Hall, Lowey, Hinchey) regarding the. pipe leak; o April 2009 conference call with Senator Gillibrand's staffer Page 17 of 27

~~ "i e - " teraalior -g o April 2009 letter from Congressional members (Markey, Hall);

o April 2009 letter from Senator Gillibrand (verbal discussion - no written response); and o March and April 2009 letters (four in total) from concerned members of the public.

On.July 1 3 th, NRC regional and headquarters staff briefed Congressman Markey/Hall's staffers regarding the specifics of the IP2 CST pipe leak. In addition, the staff discussed the agencies approach to the inspection and aging management requirements for underground piping.

Inspection Documentation: NRC inspectors completed the following ROP baseline inspections of the CST leak using risk insights:

IIR2009-002: Equipment alignment; maintenance risk; operability; modifications; testing; event follow-up; and IIR2009-003: PIR sample.

Inspection

Conclusions:

The inspectors did not identify performance deficiencies surrounding the CST leakage event as documented in IR 2009-002/003. Additionally, the inspectors concluded that Entergy's corrective actions, specific to extent-of-condition planned inspections, appears to be reasonable-in scope and pace to ensure that Entergy will have a reasonable assessment of underground piping conditions at the site.

Next Steps: The Branch will continue to maintain a focus on Entergy's underground piping inspections expected to be completed by October 2009 (The SRIs plan to review this activity through a maintenance rule sample inspection). Based on those results, the Branch will continue to consult the appropriate DRS technical expertise to ensure sufficient monitoring of licensee performance. Branch 2 will continue to work with NRR, LR, and Operating Experience to ensure updated information is provided to irhternal stakeholders. Additionally, the Branch will implement a communications plan for external stakeholders.

Page 18 of 27

Outside of Scope (9 Pages)