ML103500190
| ML103500190 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Limerick  |
| Issue date: | 12/15/2010 |
| From: | Cowan P Exelon Generation Co, Exelon Nuclear |
| To: | Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation, Document Control Desk |
| References | |
| Download: ML103500190 (33) | |
Text
Exeln Exelon Nuclear wwwexeloncorpcom 200 Exelon Way Nuciear Kennett Square, PA 19348 10 CFR 50.90 December 15, 2010 U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission ATTN: Document Control Desk Washington, D.C. 20555-0001 Limerick Generating Station, Units 1 and 2 Facility Operating License Nos. NPF-39 and NPF-85 NRC Docket Nos. 50-352 and 50-353
Subject:
Response to Request for Additional Information Regarding Proposed Technical Specification Changes to High Pressure Coolant Injection Equipment Room Delta Temperature Trip Setpoint and Allowable Value.
References:
1.
Letter from P. B. Cowan, Exelon Generation Company, LLC, to U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, License Amendment Request Table 3.3.2-2, Item 4e, HPCI Equipment Room Delta Temperature High Isolation Trip Setpoint and Allowable Value Change, dated June 30, 2010.
2.
Letter from Peter Bamford, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, to Michael J. Pacilio, President and Chief Nuclear Officer, Exelon Nuclear, Limerick Generating Station, Units 1 and 2
- Request for Additional Information Regarding Proposed Technical Specification Changes to High Pressure Coolant Injection Equipment Room Delta Temperature Trip Setpoint and Allowable Value (TAC Nos. ME41 71 and ME41 72), dated November 24, 2010.
In Reference 1, Exelon Generation Company, LLC (Exelon) submitted a request for an amendment to the Technical Specifications (TS), Appendix A of Facility Operating License Nos.
50-352 and 50-353 for Limerick Generating Station, Units 1 and 2 (LGS). The proposed amendment would revise the Technical Specification (TS) High Pressure Coolant Injection (HPCI) Equipment Room Delta Temperature High Trip Setpoint and Allowable Value listed in Table 3.3.2-2, Isolation Actuation Instrumentation Setpoints, Item 4e for LGS. The Trip Setpoint and Allowable Value are proposed to be lowered, which is in the conservative direction, to reflect a revised analysis for the HPCI equipment room temperature following a postulated 25 gallon per minute steam leak. The NRC reviewed the license amendment request and identified the need for additional information in order to complete their evaluation of the amendment request. A request for additional information (RAI) was transmitted to Exelon on November 24, 2010 (Reference 2). Attachment ito this letter provides a restatement of the RAI along with Exelons response. Attachment 2 contains the Loop Uncertainty Calculation TE-055-i N028B.
Exelon Nuclear Exelon Way Square, PA 19348
10 CFR 50.90 December 15, 2010 U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission ATTN: Document Control Desk Washington, D.C. 20555-0001 Limerick Generating Station, Units 1 and 2 Facility Operating License Nos. NPF-39 and NPF-85 NRC Docket Nos. 50-352 and 50-353
Subject:
Response to Request for Additional Information Regarding Proposed Technical Specification Changes to High Pressure Coolant Injection Equipment Room Delta Temperature Trip Setpoint and Allowable Value.
References:
1.
Letter from P. B. Cowan, Exelon Generation Company, LLC, to U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, IlLicense Amendment Request Table 3.3.2-2, Item 4e, HPCI Equipment Room Delta Temperature High Isolation Trip Setpoint and Allowable Value Change, II dated June 30, 2010.
2.
Letter from Peter Bamford, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, to Michael J. Pacilio, President and Chief Nuclear Officer, Exelon Nuclear, IlLimerick Generating Station, Units 1 and 2 - Request for Additional Information Regarding Proposed Technical Specification Changes to High Pressure Coolant Injection Equipment Room Delta Temperature Trip Setpoint and Allowable Value (TAC Nos. ME4171 and ME4172)," dated November 24, 2010.
In Reference 1, Exelon Generation Company, LLC (Exelon) submitted a request for an amendment to the Technical Specifications (TS), Appendix A of Facility Operating License Nos.
50-352 and 50-353 for Limerick Generating Station, Units 1 and 2 (LGS). The proposed amendment would revise the Technical Specification (TS) High Pressure Coolant Injection (HPCI) Equipment Room Delta Temperature High Trip Setpoint and Allowable Value listed in Table 3.3.2-2, Isolation Actuation Instrumentation Setpoints, Item 4e for LGS. The Trip Setpoint and Allowable Value are proposed to be lowered, which is in the conservative direction, to reflect a revised analysis for the HPCI equipment room temperature following a postulated 25 gallon per minute steam leak. The NRC reviewed the license amendment request and identified the need for additional information in order to complete their evaluation of the amendment request. A request for additional information (RAI) was transmitted to Exelon on November 24, 2010 (Reference 2). Attachment 1 to this letter provides a restatement of the RAI along with Exelon's response. Attachment 2 contains the Loop Uncertainty Calculation TE-055-1 N028B.
U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Docket Nos. 50-352 and 50-353 December 15, 2010 Page 2 Exelon has concluded that the information provided in this response does not impact the conclusions of the:
- 1) Technical Evaluation, 2) No Significant Hazards Consideration under the standards set forth in 10 CFR 50.92(c), or 3) Environmental Consideration as provided in the original submittal (Reference 1).
This response to the request for additional information contains no regulatory commitments.
If you have any questions or require additional information, please contact Frank Mascitelli at 610-765-5512.
I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed on the 1 day of December 2010.
Respectfully, Pamela B. bowan Director, Licensing and Regulatory Affairs Exelon Generation Company, LLC Attachments:
1-Response to Request for Additional Information 2-Loop Uncertainty Calculation TE-055-1 N028B, dated 11/20/09 cc:
Regional Administrator
- NRC Region I w/attachments NRC Senior Resident Inspector
- LGS NRC Project Manager, NRR
- LGS I
Director, Bureau of Radiation Protection
- PA Department of Environmental Resources U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Docket Nos. 50-352 and 50-353 December 15, 2010 Page 2 Exelon has concluded that the information provided in this response does not impact the conclusions of the: 1) Technical Evaluation, 2) No Significant Hazards Consideration under the standards set forth in 10 CFR 50.92(c), or 3) Environmental Consideration as provided in the original submittal (Reference 1).
This response to the request for additional information contains no regulatory commitments.
If you have any questions or require additional information, please contact Frank Mascitelli at 610-765-5512.
I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed on the 15th day of December 2010.
Respectfully, Pamela B. Cowan Director, Licensing and Regulatory Affairs Exelon Generation Company, LLC Attachments:
1-Response to Request for Additional Information 2-Loop Uncertainty Calculation TE-055-1 N028B, dated 11/20109 cc:
Regional Administrator - NRC Region I NRC Senior Resident Inspector - LGS NRC Project Manager, NRR - LGS Director, Bureau of Radiation Protection - PA Department of Environmental Resources w/attachments
ATTACHMENT 1 Limerick Generating Station Docket Nos. 50-352 and 50-353 License Amendment Request Regarding TS Table 3.3.2-2, Item 4e, HPCI Equipment Room Delta Temperature High Isolation Trip Setpoint and Allowable Value Change Response to Request for Additional Information ATTACHMENT 1 Limerick Generating Station Docket Nos. 50-352 and 50-353 License Amendment Request Regarding TS Table 3.3.2-2, Item 4e, HPCI Equipment Room Delta Temperature High Isolation Trip Setpoint and Allowable Value Change Response to Request for Additional Information
Response to RAI Regarding Proposed TS Changes to HPCI Equipment Room Delta Temperature Trip Setpoint and Allowable Value Docket Nos. 50-352 and 50-353 December 15, 2010 Page 1 of 4 By letter dated June 30, 2010 (Agency wide Documents Access and Management System (ADAMS) Accession No. ML101810434), Exelon Generation Company, LLC (Exelon) submitted a license amendment request (LAR) proposing to revise the Technical Specification (TS) High Pressure Coolant Injection (HPCI) Equipment Room Delta Temperature High Trip Setpoint and Allowable Value listed in Table 3.3.2-2, Isolation Actuation Instrumentation Setpoints, Item 4e, for Limerick Generating Station (LGS), Units 1 and 2 (Reference 1). The Trip Setpoint and Allowable Values are proposed to be lowered, which is in the conservative direction, to reflect a revised analysis for the HPCI equipment room temperature following a postulated 25 gallon per minute steam leak. The Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) staff has been reviewing the submittal and has determined that additional information is needed to complete its review (Reference 2).
The questions are restated below along with Exelons response:
1.)
The LAR, Attachment 1, Evaluation of Proposed Technical Specifications Changes, pages 4 and 5, outlines the loop uncertainty calculation, but does not provide the basis for all the numbers used in the calculation.
In order for the NRC staff to verify the acceptability of the setpoint analysis, please provide the complete calculation, indicated as Reference 6 Loop Uncertainty Calculation TE-055-1 N028B.
If the basis for all numbers used in the loop uncertainty calculation is not contained in TE-055-1 N028B, please provide that information separately.
Response
The complete calculation, Loop Uncertainty Calculation TE-055-1 N028B, dated 11/20/09 (Reference 3), is provided as Attachment 2 to this response.
2.)
The LAR, Attachment 1, pages 5 and 6, outlines instrument channel operability. For license amendment reviews, the NRC staff uses the terms As-Left and As-Found tolerances, Allowable Value, and Analytical Limit, which are all described in Regulatory Issue Summary (RIS) 2006-1 7, NRC Staff Position on the Requirements of 10 CFR 50.36, Technical Specifications, Regarding Limiting Safety System Settings During Periodic Testing and Calibration of Instrument Channels. From the description in the submittal, it is unclear how the Leave Alone Zone (LAZ) is used or treated in the instrument channel maintenance program. Therefore, please describe how application of the LAZ provides adequate assurance of channel operability. Though not required, it would be helpful to describe the LAZ as it relates to the descriptions in RIS 2006-17.
Response
The leave alone zone (LAZ) is a range of acceptable values around a nominal value established by adding or subtracting the required accuracy during calibration from the nominal value. The required accuracy is the accuracy within which an instrument, or series of instruments, must be demonstrated to perform during calibration activities. The required accuracy is typically considered equal to the reference accuracy of the device under calibration. The required accuracy for a series of instruments calibrated or Response to RAI Regarding Proposed TS Changes to HPCI Equipment Room Delta Temperature Trip Setpoint and Allowable Value Docket Nos. 50-352 and 50-353 December 15, 2010 Page 1 of 4 By letter dated June 30, 2010 (Agency wide Documents Access and Management System (ADAMS) Accession No. ML101810434), Exelon Generation Company, LLC (Exelon) submitted a license amendment request (LAR) proposing to revise the Technical Specification (TS) High Pressure Coolant Injection (HPCI) Equipment Room Delta Temperature High Trip Setpoint and Allowable Value listed in Table 3.3.2-2, Isolation Actuation Instrumentation Setpoints, Item 4e, for Limerick Generating Station (LGS), Units 1 and 2 (Reference 1). The Trip Setpoint and Allowable Values are proposed to be lowered, which is in the conservative direction, to reflect a revised analysis for the HPCI equipment room temperature following a postulated 25 gallon per minute steam leak. The Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) staff has been reviewing the submittal and has determined that additional information is needed to complete its review (Reference 2).
The questions are restated below along with Exelon's response:
1.)
The LAR, Attachment 1, "Evaluation of Proposed Technical Specifications Changes,"
pages 4 and 5, outlines the loop uncertainty calculation, but does not provide the basis for all the numbers used in the calculation. In order for the NRC staff to verify the acceptability of the setpoint analysis, please provide the complete calculation, indicated as "Reference 6 - Loop Uncertainty Calculation TE-055-1 N028B." If the basis for all numbers used in the loop uncertainty calculation is not contained in TE-055-1 N028B, please provide that information separately.
Response
The complete calculation, Loop Uncertainty Calculation TE-055-1 N028B, dated 11/20109 (Reference 3), is provided as Attachment 2 to this response.
2.)
The LAR, Attachment 1, pages 5 and 6, outlines instrument channel operability. For license amendment reviews, the NRC staff uses the terms As-Left and As-Found tolerances, Allowable Value, and Analytical Limit, which are all described in Regulatory Issue Summary (RIS) 2006-17, "NRC Staff Position on the Requirements of 10 CFR 50.36, 'Technical Specifications,' Regarding Limiting Safety System Settings During Periodic Testing and Calibration of Instrument Channels." From the description in the submittal, it is unclear how the "Leave Alone Zone" (LAZ) is used or treated in the instrument channel maintenance program. Therefore, please describe how application of the LAZ provides adequate assurance of channel operability. Though not required, it would be helpful to describe the LAZ as it relates to the descriptions in RIS 2006-17.
Response
The leave alone zone (LAZ) is a range of acceptable values around a nominal value established by adding or subtracting the required accuracy during calibration from the nominal value. The required accuracy is the accuracy within which an instrument, or series of instruments, must be demonstrated to perform during calibration activities. The required accuracy is typically considered equal to the reference accuracy of the device under calibration. The required accuracy for a series of instruments calibrated or
Response to RAI Regarding Proposed TS Changes to HPCI Equipment Room Delta Temperature Trip Setpoint and Allowable Value Docket Nos. 50-352 and 50-353 December 15, 2010 Page 2 of 4 checked together is the Square Root Sum of the Squares (SRSS) combination of the individual instrument required accuracies.
When the As-Found instrument(s) reading is found within this band during surveillance testing or calibration checks, no calibration adjustment is required.
If the As-Found instrument reading is found outside this band during surveillance testing or calibration checks, the instrument must be adjusted so that the As-Left instrument reading is within the LAZ. Since the required accuracy, and therefore the LAZ, is based on the reference accuracy of the device under calibration, the LAZ provides adequate assurance that this instrument is performing as expected and the instrument channel is operable. For the purpose of comparison with RIS 2006-1 7, the LAZ is used in the same manner as the As-Left Tolerance (ALT).
3.)
As described in RIS 2006-17, values found outside the As-Found limit are typically entered in the corrective action program (CAP), recalibrated and retested. Also, as described in RIS 2006-17, it is the NRC staff position that verifying the As-Found setpoint is within limits is part of the determination that an instrument is functioning as required. Further, Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations Part 50, Appendix B, Criterion XVI, Corrective Action, requires that significant conditions adverse to quality be promptly identified, corrected, and documented. From the process description in the LAR, it appears that the setpoint can drift up to the Allowable Value and never be entered in the CAP. Please clarify what actions would be taken for setpoints found to exceed the LAZ.
If no CAP entry is made for setpoints outside of a pre-established As-Found tolerance band, please justify why this provides acceptable setpoint programmatic controls regarding evaluation, trending, and corrective actions, and explain how this ensures that these instruments are operating in accordance with the assumptions in the governing setpoint analysis.
Response
If the As-Found setpoint is found to exceed acceptable limits (also known as LAZ) and the Allowable Value, the test performer attempts to adjust the setpoint within acceptable limits.
If the setpoint can be adjusted within acceptable limits, the test is statused as Fail/Pass.
If the setpoint cannot be adjusted within acceptable limits the test is statused as Fail. The test performer also initiates an Issue Report in the CAP in either case.
If the As-Found setpoint is found to exceed acceptable limits but does not exceed the Allowable Value, the test performer attempts to adjust the setpoint within acceptable limits.
If the setpoint can be adjusted within acceptable limits, the test is statused as Pass.
In these cases the surveillance test coordinator reviews the test for repeat occurrences.
If repeat occurrences are identified, the condition is considered for inclusion in the CAP. This provides acceptable programmatic control since the setpoint can be adjusted to within acceptable limits, the instrument(s) is operating within the requirements of the instrument channel and within the allocations of margin for instrument drift. In addition, an allocation of margin for calibration accuracy is provided between the Allowable Value and Analytical Limit. The allocation of this margin assures Response to RAI Regarding Proposed TS Changes to HPCI Equipment Room Delta Temperature Trip Setpoint and Allowable Value Docket Nos. 50-352 and 50-353 December 15, 2010 Page 2 of 4 checked together is the Square Root Sum of the Squares (SRSS) combination of the individual instrument required accuracies.
When the As-Found instrument(s) reading is found within this band during surveillance testing or calibration checks, no calibration adjustment is required. If the As-Found instrument reading is found outside this band during surveillance testing or calibration checks, the instrument must be adjusted so that the As-Left instrument reading is within the LAZ. Since the required accuracy, and therefore the LAZ, is based on the reference accuracy of the device under calibration, the LAZ provides adequate assurance that this instrument is performing as expected and the instrument channel is operable. For the purpose of comparison with RIS 2006-17, the LAZ is used in the same manner as the As-Left Tolerance (ALT).
3.)
As described in RIS 2006-17, values found outside the As-Found limit are typically entered in the corrective action program (CAP), recalibrated and retested. Also, as described in RIS 2006-17, it is the NRC staff position that verifying the As-Found setpoint is within limits is part of the determination that an instrument is functioning as required. Further, Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations Part 50, Appendix B, Criterion XVI, "Corrective Action," requires that significant conditions adverse to quality be promptly identified, corrected, and documented. From the process description in the LAR, it appears that the setpointcan drift up to the Allowable Value and never be entered in the CAP. Please clarify what actions would be taken for setpoints found to exceed the LAZ. If no CAP entry is made for setpoints outside of a pre-established As-Found tolerance band, please justify why this provides acceptable setpoint programmatic controls regarding evaluation, trending, and corrective actions, and explain how this ensures that these instruments are operating in accordance with the assumptions in the governing setpoint analysis.
Response
If the As-Found setpoint is found to exceed acceptable limits (also known as LAZ) and the Allowable Value, the test performer attempts to adjust the setpoint within acceptable limits. If the setpoint can be adjusted within acceptable limits, the test is statused as Fail/Pass. If the setpoint cannot be adjusted within acceptable limits the test is statused as Fail. The test performer also initiates an Issue Report in the CAP in either case.
If the As-Found setpoint is found to exceed acceptable limits but does not exceed the Allowable Value, the test performer attempts to adjust the setpoint within acceptable limits. If the setpoint can be adjusted within acceptable limits, the test is statused as Pass. In these cases the surveillance test coordinator reviews the test for repeat occurrences. If repeat occurrences are identified, the condition is considered for inclusion in the CAP. This provides acceptable programmatic control since the setpoint can be adjusted to within acceptable limits, the instrument(s) is operating within the requirements of the instrument channel and within the allocations of margin for instrument drift. In addition, an allocation of margin for calibration accuracy is provided between the Allowable Value and Analytical Limit. The allocation of this margin assures
Response to RAI Regarding Proposed TS Changes to HPCI Equipment Room Delta Temperature Trip Setpoint and Allowable Value Docket Nos. 50-352 and 50-353 December 15, 2010 Page 3 of 4 operability of the instrument channel as long as the As-Found setpoint does not exceed the Allowable Value.
If the setpoint cannot be adjusted within acceptable limits, the test is statused as Fail and the test performer initiates an Issue Report in the CAP.
4.)
The LAR, Attachment 1, page 3, states that the CFLUD program is the same program as was used to support a similar LGS 1995 License Amendment. However, a review of a LGS request for additional information response from the specified 1995 amendment dated September 23, 1994 (ADAMS Legacy Library Accession No. 9409290232), and the NRC safety evaluation for the 1995 amendment dated January 20, 1995 (ADAMS Accession No. MLO1 1560074), indicates that PCFLUD was the computer code used.
The LAR provides a description of certain changes between CFLUD and PCFLUD, however it does not identify how the computer coding changes, it any, were validated.
Please clarify which computer code was used for both the 1995 amendment and the current LAR.
If there have been changes to the computer code used to support the current LAR as compared to the 1995 amendment, please describe the steps taken to validate the changes.
Response
The computations of the temperature of the HPCI room following a steam leak prepared in support of the 1995 license amendment were prepared using the CFLUD computer code as was the calculation supporting the current LAR. The statement in the current LAR, Attachment 1, page 3, refers to the computations of room temperature following steam leaks. However, the post LOCA temperature curve for the HPCI pump room supplied in the response to RAI for the 1995 license amendment, included in the letter from PECO Energy to the NRC dated September 23, 1994, was prepared using PCFLUD. This curve was excerpted from Calculation LM-400, rev. 0 prepared in September 1993. The CFLUD computer code was not completed until December 1993.
Both the PCFLUD and CFLUD computer codes were prepared by Bechtel Corporation, under their QA program. The validation and verification of both computer codes was likewise performed by Bechtel in accordance with their software QA program. Validation and verification cases for both programs were supplied to PECO Energy by Bechtel to verify proper installation and operation of the computer codes. Exelon maintains both computer programs under the existing Exelon Software QA program.
REFERENCES:
1.
Letter from P. B. Cowan, Exelon Generation Company, LLC, to U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, License Amendment Request Table 3.3.3-2, Item 4e, HPCI Equipment Room Delta Temperature High Isolation Trip Setpoint and Allowable Value Change, dated June 30, 2010.
Response to RAI Regarding Proposed TS Changes to HPCI Equipment Room Delta Temperature Trip Setpoint and Allowable Value Docket Nos. 50-352 and 50-353 December 15, 2010 Page 3 of 4 operability of the instrument channel as long as the As-Found setpoint does not exceed the Allowable Value. If the setpoint cannot be adjusted within acceptable limits, the test is statused as Fail and the test performer initiates an Issue Report in the CAP.
4.)
The LAR, Attachment 1, page 3, states that the CFLUD program is the same program as was used to support a similar LGS 1995 License Amendment. However, a review of a LGS request for additional information response from the specified 1995 amendment dated September 23, 1994 (ADAMS Legacy Library Accession No. 9409290232), and the NRC safety evaluation for the 1995 amendment dated January 20, 1995 (ADAMS Accession No. ML011560074), indicates that PCFLUD was the computer code used.
The LAR provides a description of certain changes between CFLUD and PCFLUD, however it does not identify how the computer coding changes, if any, were validated.
Please clarify which computer code was used for both the 1995 amendment and the current LAR. If there have been changes to the computer code used to support the current LAR as compared to the 1995 amendment, please describe the steps taken to validate the changes.
Response
The computations of the temperature of the HPCI room following a steam leak prepared in support of the 1995 license amendment were prepared using the CFLUD computer code as was the calculation supporting the current LAR. The statement in the current LAR, Attachment 1, page 3, refers to the computations of room temperature following steam leaks. However, the post LDCA temperature curve for the HPCI pump room supplied in the response to RAJ for the 1995 license amendment, included in the letter from PECD Energy to the NRC dated September 23, 1994, was prepared using PCFLUD. This curve was excerpted from Calculation LM-400, rev. 0 prepared in September 1993. The CFLUD computer code was not completed until December 1993.
Both the PCFLUD and CFLUD computer codes were prepared by Bechtel Corporation, under their QA program. The validation and verification of both computer codes was likewise performed by Bechtel in accordance with their software QA program. Validation and verification cases for both programs were supplied to PECD Energy by Bechtel to verify proper installation and operation of the computer codes. Exelon maintains both computer programs under the existing Exelon Software QA program.
REFERENCES:
1.
Letter from P. B. Cowan, Exelon Generation Company, LLC, to U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, "License Amendment Request Table 3.3.3-2, Item 4e, HPCI Equipment Room Delta Temperature High Isolation Trip Setpoint and Allowable Value Change,"
dated June 30, 2010.
Response to RAI Regarding Proposed TS Changes to HPCI Equipment Room Delta Temperature Trip Setpoint and Allowable Value Docket Nos. 50-352 and 50-353 December 15, 2010 Page 4 of 4 2.
Letter from Peter Bamford, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, to Michael J. Pacilio, President and Chief Nuclear Officer, Exelon Nuclear, Limerick Generating Station, Units 1 and 2
- Request for Additional Information Regarding Proposed Technical Specification Changes to High Pressure Coolant Injection Equipment Room Delta Temperature Trip Setpoint and Allowable Value (TAC Nos. ME4171 and ME4172),
dated November 24, 2010.
3.
Loop Uncertainty Calculation TE-055-1 N028B, dated 11/20/09.
Response to RAI Regarding Proposed TS Changes to HPCI Equipment Room Delta Temperature Trip Setpoint and Allowable Value Docket Nos. 50-352 and 50-353 December 15, 2010 Page 4 of 4 2.
Letter from Peter Bamford, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, to Michael J. Pacilio, President and Chief Nuclear Officer, Exelon Nuclear, "Limerick Generating Station, Units 1 and 2 - Request for Additional Information Regarding Proposed Technical Specification Changes to High Pressure Coolant Injection Equipment Room Delta Temperature Trip Setpoint and Allowable Value (TAC Nos. ME4171 and ME4172),"
dated November 24, 2010.
3.
Loop Uncertainty Calculation TE-055-1 N028B, dated 11/20/09.
ATTACHMENT 2 Limerick Generating Station Docket Nos. 50-352 and 50-353 License Amendment Request Regarding TS Table 3.3.2-2, Item 4e, HPCI Equipment Room Delta Temperature High Isolation Trip Setpoint and Allowable Value Change Loop Uncertainty Calculation TE-055-1 N028B, dated 11/20/09 ATTACHMENT 2 Limerick Generating Station Docket Nos. 50-352 and 50-353 License Amendment Request Regarding TS Table 3.3.2-2, Item 4e, HPCI Equipment Room Delta Temperature High Isolation Trip Setpoint and Allowable Value Change Loop Uncertainty Calculation TE-055-1 N0288, dated 11/20/09
r LOOP UNCERTATNTY CALCULATION Loop Number:
TE-055--1N028B 01
{
Page 1 of 25 Originator:
COLLIER KB Date:
11/16/09 Rev:
0 Reviewer:
AJMERA M.
Date:
11/17/09 Approver:
GEORGE RT Date:
11/20/09 SECTION 1.0 2.0 3.0 4.0 5.0 6.0 7.0 PURPOSE DESIGN BASIS ASSUMPTIONS REFERENCES ATTACHMENTS ANALYSIS RESULTS SupDort Data. Sheet Attachments : : : : : : : : :
Loop Uncertainty Session Data Calculation Results Loop Data and Configuration Loop Calibration Data Instrument Data Vendor Data Location Data Process Concerns Device Dependencies TABLE OF CONTENTS LOOP UNCERTAINTY CALCULATION LOOD Number:
TE-055-1N028B 01 I
Page 1 of 25 Originator:
COLLIER KB Date:
11/16/09 I
Rev:
0 Reviei.Aler:
AJMERA M.
Date:
11/17/09 Approver:
GEORGE RT Date:
11/20/09 TABLE OF CONTENTS SECrrIQN 1.0 PURPOSE 2.0 DESIGN BASIS 3.0 ASSUiv!PTIONS
4.0 REFERENCES
5.0 ATTACHMENTS 6.0 ANALYSIS 7.0 RESULTS Support Data Sheet Attachments : : : : :
Attacl1ment 6: : : :
Loop Uncertainty Session Data Calculation Results Loop Data and Configuration Loop Calibration Data Instrument Data Vendor Data Location Data Process Concerns Device Dependencies
I LOOP UNCERTAINTY CALCULATION L°° Number:
TE055-1N028B 01 1
Page 2 of 25 Originator:
COLLIER KB Date:
11/16/09 1
Rev:
0 II Reviewer:
AJMERA M.
Date:
11/17/09 Approver:
GEORGE RT Date:
11/20/09 10 PURPOSE This section includes the Objective, Limitations, Conclusions, and the Applicability Statement of this calculation.
1.1 Objective The purpose of this calculation is to determine the Allowable Value (AV)
Nominal Trip Setpoint (NTSP) and Actual Trip Setpoint (ATSP) for a high differential temperature steam source isolation by the Leak Detection System at the Limerick Generating Station (LGS)
The increasing differential temperature signal is sensed by channel H311 of the High Pressure Coolant Injection (HPCI)
Compartment Leak Detection Instrument, TE-055-lN028B TE-055-1N0293.
This calculations is performed utilizing environmental conditions for a High Energy Line Break (HELB) accident scenario.
A summary of the calculation results may be found in Section 7.0 of this calculation.
Other redundant/mirror loops for which the results of this calculation are applicable may be found in Section 1.4, Applicability.
1.2 Limitations The Max and Mm Acceptable Limits calculated in Section 7.8 are not authorized for use in the PECo maintenance program by this revision of the calculation.
This calculation is produced utilizing the harsh environmental conditions for a HELB accident scenario.
(See Section 2.2.5).
The appropriate use of this calculation to support design or station activities, other than those specified in Section 1.1 of this calculation, is the responsibility of the user.
1.3 Conclusions The Upper Allowable Value of 108.5 DEGF was calculated by the software.
The Upper Allowable Value is the result displayed in Section 7.7 of this calculation.
A Lower Allowable Value of
- 99. 5 DEGF was determined using the calculation results and engineering judgement.
The calculation oroduces an Upper Allowable Value of 108.5 DEGE.
The Upper Allowable Value (108.5 DEGF) is subtracted from the Upper Analytical/Process Limit (113 DEGF) to obtain a value of 4.5 DEGE which represents a two (2) sigma one sided boo Uncertainty which does not contain any instrument LOOP UI'1CERTAIN lry CALCULATION Loop Number:
'rE-055-1N028B 01 I
Page 2 of 25 Originator:
COLLIER KB Date:
11/16/09 I
Rev:
0 Reviewer:
AJMERA M.
Date:
11/17/09 Approver:
GEORGE RT Date:
11/20/09 1.0 PURPOSE This section includes the Objective, Limitations, Conclusions, and the Applicability Statement of this calculation..
1.1 Objective The purpose of this calculation is to determine the Allowable Value (AV),
Nominal Trip Setpoint (NTSP) and Actual Trip Setpoint (ATSP) for a high differential temperature steam source isolation by the Leak Detection System at the Limerick Generating Station (LGS).
The increasing differential temperature signal is sensed by channel HB" of the High Pressure Coolant Injection (HPCI)
Compartment Leak Detection Instrument, TE-055-1N028B TE-055-1N029B.
This calculations is performed utilizing environmental conditions for a High Energy Line Break (HELB) accident scenario.
A summary of the calculation results may be found in Section 7.0 of this calculation.
Other redundant/mirror loops for which the results of this calculation are applicable may be found in Section 1.4, Applicability.
1.2 Limitations The Max and Min Acceptable Limits calculated in Section 7.8 are not authorized for use in the PEeo maintenance program by this revision of the calculation.
This calculation is produced utilizing the harsh environmental conditions for a HELB accident scenario.
(See Section 2.2.5).
The appropriate use of this calculation to support design or station activities, other than those specified in Section 1.1 of this calculation, is the responsibility of the user.
1.3 Conclusions Allowable Value of 108.5 DEGF was calculated The Upper lil1o'Nable 'Value is the resul 7.7 of this calculation.
I LOOP UNCERTAINTY CALCULATION II op Number:
TEO55-1NO28B I 01 I
Page 3 at 25 J j Originator:
COLLIER KB Date:
11/16/09 Rev:
0
[!yiewer:
ALJMERA N.
{ Date:
11/17/09 (Aoprover:
GEORGE RT JDate:
11/20/09 drift.
This amount (4.5 DEGF) is then added to the Lower Analytical/Process Limit of 95 DEGF to obtain the 99.5 DEGF value (tower Allowable Value).
An analysis of the proposed changes to the current station process setpoint values in relation to the results of this calculation has been performed and it has been concluded that the results of this calculation support the proposed changes to the current station setpoint values (Ref 4.15).
An Insulation Resistance (IR)
Calculation for TE-055-1N0283 Configuration 01 determined that the IR error associated with this instrument loop was insignificant
(< 0.001% of loop span)
It was therefore concluded that no IR effects would be included in this calculation.
This IR Calculation resides in the IISCP software and is utilized as further justification for the position taken by PECo previously that IR concerns do not have any adverse effects on system operability at LGS.
The environmental conditions for the locations of the temperature elements for the redundant/mirror loops are the same/equivalent or not as harsh as those specified for the temperature element for this loop.
Since the variables in this calculation are the same/equivalent or more restrictive, this calculation is valid for the redundant/mirror loops listed in Section 1.4.
1.4 Applicability A data evaluation has been performed in order to determine
- which, if any, redundant/mirror instrument. loops are bound by the results of this calculation (the base calculation).
The data evaluation results validate that this base calculation is applicable to the following Loop Affiliation Numbers:
TE-055-INO28D Configuration 01 TE-055-INO29D TE-055-2N028B Configuration 01 TE-055-2N029B TE-055-2N028D Configuration 01 TE-055-2N029D The results of this base calculation are hounding values for the instrument loops listed above based on such factors as instrument manufacturer and model number, instrumenc location environmental parameters and actual installacion and use of t:te instrument in the measurement of the process railg.
re oy llfterece umo : a rr a reuuaa,mrror 1cos 3 cc difference r niroren:a1 aa r r each aoo ce ro he physical locations of each thermocouple, which does not introduce any additional uncertainty.
LOOP U:0TCERTAINTY CALCULATION Loop Nurnber:
TE-055-1N028B 01 I
Page 3 of 25 Originator:
COLLIER KB Date:
11/16/09 Rev:
0 RevievITer:
AJ'l:1ERA M.
Date:
11/17/09 Aoprover:
GEORGE RT Date:
11/20/09 drift.
This amount (4.5 DEGF) is then added to the Lower ical/Process Limit of 95 DEGF to obtain the 99.5 DEGF value (Lower Allowable Value).
An analysis of the proposed changes to the current station process setpoint values in relation to the results of this calculation has been performed and it has been concluded that the results of this calculation support the proposed changes to the current station setpoint values (Ref 4.15).
An Insulation Resistance (IR) Calculation for TE-055-1N028B Configuration 01 determined that the IR error associated with this instrument loop was insignificant 0.001% of loop span).
It was therefore concluded that no IR effects would be included in this calculation.
This IR Calculation resides in the IISCP software and is utilized as further justification for the position taken by PECo previously that IR concerns do not have any adverse effects on system operability at LGS.
The environmental conditions for the locations of the temperature elements for the redundant/mirror loops are the same/equivalent or not as harsh as those specified for the temperature element for this loop.
Since the variables in this calculation are the same/equivalent or more restrictive, this calculation is valid for the redundant/mirror loops listed in Section 1.4.
1.4 Applicability A data evaluation has been performed in order to determine which, if any, redundant/mirror instrument. loops are bound by the results of this calculation {the "base" calculation}.
The data evaluation results validate that this "base" calculation is applicable to the following Loop Affiliation Numbers:
TE-055-1t-J028D Configuration 01 TE-055-1:N029D TE-055-2:tlO28B Configuration 01 TE-055-2r.:r029B TE-055-2tJ028D Configuration 01 TE-055-2N029D The results of this "base" calculation are bounding values for the instrument loops listed above based on such factors as instrtlment manufacturer and model nurrber 1 instrument location environmental parameters~ and actual installation aIld use of the instrument the measurement of the process va.riable.
in locations of any additional to
fl LOOP UNCERTAINTY CALCULATION
/ Loop Number:
TE-055-1N0283 01 i
Page
[Originator:
COLLIER KB Date:
11/16/09
[Reviewer:
AJMERA M.
Date:
11/17/09 LApprover:
GEORGE RT Date:
11/20/09 2.0 DESIGN BASIS This section includes the Technical Background and Design Input information relevant to this calculation.
2.1 Technical Background High temperature in the space in which the HPC1 steam lines are located outside the primary containment could indicate a breach in a HPCI steam line.
The automatic closure of the HPCI isolation valve prevents the excessive loss of reactor coolant and the release of significant amounts of radio-active material from the nuclear system process barrier.
When high temperatures occur in the HPCI steam line space, the inboard and outboard steam supply isolation valves are isolated.
Pairs of temperature elements monitor for high ventilation air differential temperature and compartment ambient temperature.
One sensor of each pair is associated with one of the logic divisions; the other is associated with the other division.
2.2 Design Input 2.2.1 Calculation -1001 specifies 113.0 DEGF as the Upper Analytical/Process Limit (AL) and 95.0 DEGF as the Lower Analytical/Process Limit (AL)
(Ref 4.11).
2.2.2 This calculation includes any applicable System Rerate Design/Operating Conditions and Impacts as a result of power rerate analyses per the guidelines contained in Specification NE-l77 (Ref 4.6
& 4.8).
2.2.3 Additional margin of 4.5 DEGF was added to this calculation to support the setpoint recommended by Calculation -1001.
Of this 4.5
- DEGF, 45 DEGF is assigned margin to support the IISCP Loop Leave Alone Zone (LAZ)guidelines as discussed in Section 2.2.6 and to account for the calibration practices of the instrument channels.
The calibration practices of the instrument channels are accounted for by providing additional margin for M&TE beyond that in Section 6.2.2.
This is done to provide 1% to account for the setting tolerance of the TIS.
This also provides additional margin beyond that portion allocated in Section 6.2.1 to cover the 1% required accuracy for the TE.
Setting Tolerance is not provided specifically for the TE since it is not calibratable.
2.2.4 Based on enoineering judgement, SI has been included as a process consideration.
This consideration results in a conservatively rounded Allowable Value ttiat supports tne current 7ecn Spec revson request.
22.5 fle selection of BILE environmental conditions for the performance of this calculation is based on engineering judgement and system knowledge.
The environmental conditions for a HEL3 accident 4 of
?5 j Rev:
not LOOP tJNCERTAINrrY CALCULATION Loop Number:
TE 055-1~J028B 01 I
Page 4 of 25 Originator:
COLLIER KB Date:
11/16/09 I
Rev:
0 Reviewer:
AJI~ERA r1..
Date:
11/17/09 Approver:
GEORGE RT Date:
11/20/09 2.0 DESIGN BASIS This section includes the Technical Background and Design Input information relevant to this calculation.
2.1 Technical Background High temperature in the space in which the HPCI steam lines are located outside the primary containment could indicate a breach in a HPCI steam line.
The automatic closure of the HPCI isolation valve prevents the excessive loss of reactor coolant and the release of significant amounts of radio-active material from the nuclear system process barrier.
When high temperatures occur in the HPCI steam line space, the inboard and outboard steam supply isolation valves are isolated.
Pairs of ternperature elements monitor for high ventilation air differential temperature and compartment ambient temperature.
One sensor of each pair is associated with one of the logic divisions; the other is associated with the other division.
2.2 Design Input 2.2.1 Calculation -1001 specifies 113.0 DEGF as the Upper Analytical/Process Limit (AL) and 95.0 DEGF as the Lower Analytical/Process Limit (AL)
(Ref 4.11).
2.2.2 This calculation includes any applicable System Rerate Design/Operating Conditions and Impacts as a result of power rerate analyses per the guidelines contained in Specification NE-177 (Ref 4.6 & 4.8).
2.2.3 Additional margin of 4.5 DEGF was added to this calculation to support the setpoint recommended by Calculation -1001.
Of this 4.5 DEGF, 4.5 DEGF is assigned margin to support the IISCP Loop Leave Alone Zone (LAZ)guidelines as discussed in Section 2.2.6 and to account for the calibration practices of the instrument channels.
The calibration practices of the instrument channels are accounted for by providing additional margin for M&TE beyond that in Section 6.2.2.
This is done to provide 1% to account for the setting tolerance of the TIS.
This also provides additional margin beyond that allocated in Section 6.2.1 to cover the 1%
accuracy for the TE.
Tolerance fical for the TE since t
is 2.2.. *4 Based 2.2.5 U'>J\\..,\\C.UI.C::;l.J.L./
51 has been incll..lded This consideration AllotfJable '\\lalue the current Tech Spec revision request.
HELB envirolli~ental
22.6 The de1a between the Allowable Value and the Actual Trip Set Point Wlthj this calculation is 4.5 DEGF which meets or exceeds the IISCp Program Guidance of greater than one times the LAZ (Ref 4.3) 2.2.7 The Setting Tolerances for the TIS in this calculation were reallocated from the region between AI and AV to the region between NTSP and ATSP in order to obtain the target Tech Spec setpoint.
This reallocation was accomplished by assigning o.o to the Setting Tolerance of each instrument and verifying that the assigned margin amount was greater than one LAZ.
Since the LAZ is equal to the square root of the sum of the squares of the Setting Tolerances, verification that the assigned margin is greater than one LAZ insures that the effects of the Setting Tolerances are included in the determination of the ATSP.
No specific setting tolerance was provided for the T/C since it is not calibratable 2.2.8 All other design inputs to this calculation are documented on the Supporting Data Sheet Attachents La 3.0 ASSUMpTIONS 3.1 ASSptj 00 g Not Requiring Confirmation 3.1.1 None 3.2 Assumptio Requiring Confirmation 3.2.1 None 4O REFERENCES 4.1 Limerick Generating Station UTpdated Final Safety Analysis Report (UFSAR),
Revision 14 (dated 9/29/Os)
Section 5.2.5.2.2
- Detection of Abnormal Leakage Outside the Primary Containment; Section 7.6L3
- Leak Detection Systeni
- instrumentation and Controls; 4.2 Limerick Generating Station Tecical Specifications Gnit 1,
Anendxnent 161, (dated 8/30/02)
Table 33.2-2 item 4.e.
3 ICppu93 0
Islor
-rogrrn ld1 for e implementation of Phe of the PECo Improved instrj Setpjt Control Progr (lISCp)
(Setpojnt Methodo1o, Reference; 44
- 5171, Revisjor 0016, Limerick Ge:neratirg Station Units l&2 scenario are the most severe conditions to which the thermocouple sensors may be exposed and still he expected to perform their safety function.
LOOP UNCERTAINTY CALCULATION Loop Number:
1'E-055-1N028B 01 I
Page 5 of 25 Originator:
COLLIER KB Date:
11/16/09 I
Rev:
0 Revie\\1er:
AJMERA r4.
Date:
11/17/09 Approver:
GEORGE RT Date:
11/20/09 scenario are the most severe conditions to which the thermocouple sensors may be exposed and still be expected to perform their safety function.
2.2.6 The delta between the Allowable Value and the Actual Trip Set Point within this calculation is 4.5 DEGF which meets or exceeds the IISCP Program Guidance of greater than one times the LAZ (Ref 4.3) 2.2.7 The Setting Tolerances for the TIS in this calculation were reallocated from the region between AL and AV to the region between NTSP and A'rsp in order to obtain the target Tech Spec setpoint.
This reallocation was accomplished by assigning 0.0 to the Setting Tolerance of each instrument and verifying that the assigned margin amount was greater than one LAZ.
Since the LAZ is equal to the square root of the sum of the squares of the Setting Tolerances, verification that the assigned margin is greater than one LAZ insures that the effects of the Setting Tolerances are included in the determination of the ATSP.
No specific setting tolerance was provided for the TIC since it is not calibratable.
2.2.8 All other design inputs to this calculation are documented on the Supporting Data Sheet Attachments.
3.0 ASSUMPTIONS 3.1 Assumptions Not Requiring Confirmation 3.1.1 None 3.2 Assumptions Requiring Confirmation 3.2.1 None
4.0 REFERENCES
4.1 Limerick Generating Station Updated Final Safety Analysis Report (UFSAR),
Revision 14 (dated 9/29/08)
Section 5.2.5.2.2
- Detection of Abnormal Leakage Outside the Primary Containment; Section 7.6.1.3 Leak Detection System -
Instrlli~entation and Controls; 4.2 Station Technical
~~~~~~ications, 61 1
(dated 8/30/02) 3"
. 2-2 tern Reference).
4.
1 -
Program r
Phase I of the PECo (IISCP)
('-E~<r.r"r"'<""
7 R8"(J'ision ion
LOOP UNCERTAINTY CALCULATION
[_.op Number:
TE055-1N0283 01 1
Page 6 of 25 Or+/-g+/-nator:
COLLIER KB Date:
11/16/09 1
Rev:
0 Reviewer:
AJMERA M Date:
11/17/09 Approver:
GEORGE RT Date:
11/20/09 Environmental Service Conditions Specification.
(Location Data reference) 4.5 Master Calibration Sheets generated in accordance with PECo procedure ICii--50014 for TE-055-1N028B dated 08/30/01, TE-0551N029B dated 8/30/01,
& TIS-025--101B dated 09/03/09.
4.6 Philadelphia Electric Letter from G.C.
Storey to G.R.
Hull General Electric Company, subject Final OPL-3 for Limerick ARTS/MELLLA Analysis.
This document contains Limerick 1
Reload 4(cycle 5)
Resolved OPL-3 Forms that include ARTS/MELLLA at rerate conditions Dated 03/09/93.
(Power Rerate Information Reference) 4.7 General Electric Design Specification Data Sheets (DSDS)
A61-4040--L-004, Revision 0005 (Design Basis Reference ).
48 NE-l77, Revision 0001, Nuclear Safety Related Specification for Limerick Generating Station Units 1&2 Power Rerate Operating Conditions (Power Rerate Information Reference).
4.9 Calculation -1001 Revision 0004 Compartment Temperature Transients for Steam and Water Leaks (Analytical/Process Limit Reference) 4.10 Calculation -2208 Revision 0003 RHR Compartment Pressurization due to Steam Line Break to RHR Hx (Design Basis Reference) 4.11 Calculation LM-0400 Revision 0004 HPCI and RCIC Pump Room Temperature Response Following a Small Break LOCA, Normal Power Rerate Conditions (Design Basis Reference).
4.12 Calculation LE-0036 Revision 0001 Equivalency Evaluation between G.E.
Numac 12DM and Riley Temperature Instrumentation to demonstrate Accuracy and Support the use of existing Setpoints for the Steam Leak Detection System, LOS Units 1
and 2 (Vendor Information Reference) 4.13 Modification P-00212 Revision 0000 HPCI/RCiC EQ Upgrade (Design Basis Reference).
4.14 EQRR P-300 Revision Pyco Temperature Elements (Vendor Information Reference) 5. 0 ATTACHMENTS 5.1 See Supporting Data Sheet Attachments located within this calculation.
6O ANALYSIS 6.1 Loop Effects 61.i Loop ID No.:
TEO55lNO28B Configuration:
01 LOOP UNCERTAINTY CALCULATION Loop Number:
'rE-055-1N028B 01 I
Page 6 of 25 Originator:
COLLIER KB Date:
11/16/09 I
Rev:
0 Reviewer:
AJMEF.A M..
Date:
11/17/09 Approver:
GEORGE RT Date:
11/20/09 Environmental Service Conditions Specification.
Data reference).
(Location 4.5 Master Calibration Sheets generated in accordance with PEeo procedure IC-11-50014 for TE-055-1N028B dated 08/30/01, TE-055-1N029B dated 8/30/01,
& TIS-025-101B dated 09/03/09.
4.6 Philadelphia Electric Letter from G.C.
Storey to G.R.
Hull General Electric Company, subject "Final OPL-3 for Limerick ARTS/MELLLA Analysis".
This document contains Limerick 1 Reload 4(cycle 5)
Resolved OPL-3 Forms that include ARTS/MELLLA at rerate conditions Dated 03/09/93.
(Power Rerate Information Reference).
4.7 General Electric Design Specification Data Sheets (DSDS)
A61-4040-L-004, Revision 0005 (Design Basis Reference).
4.8 NE-177, Revision 0001, Nuclear Safety Related Specification for Limerick Generating Station Units 1&2 Power Rerate Operating Conditions (Power Rerate Information Reference).
4.9 Calculation -1001 Revision 0004 "Compartment Temperature Transients for Steam and Water Leaks" (Analytical/Process Limit Reference) 4.10 Calculation -2208 Revision 0003 "RHR Compartment Pressurization due to Steam Line Break to RHR Hx" (Design Basis Reference).
4.11 Calculation LM-0400 Revision 0004 "HPCI and ReIe Pump Room Temperature Response Following a Small Break LOCA, Normal &
Power Rerate Conditions" (Design Basis Reference).
4.12 Calculation LE-0036 Revision 0001 "Equivalency Evaluation between G.E.
Numac LDM and Riley Temperature Instrumentation to demonstrate Accuracy and Support the use of existing Setpoints for the Steam Leak Detection System, LGS Units 1 and 2 ft (Vendor Information Reference) 4.13 Modification P-00212 Revision 0000 ItHPCI/RCIC EQ Upgrade" (Design Basis Reference).
4.14 EQRR P-300 Revision "Pyco Temperature Elements" (Vendor Information Reference) 5.0 ATTACHMENTS 5.. 1 See calculation.
6
- 0 N\\IALYSIS 6.1 Loop Effects Data Sheet Attach~1'flents located within this 6.1.
Loop ID r\\10. :
01
r LOOP UNCERTAINTY CALCULATION 11
[p Number:
TE-055-1N028E 01 1
Page 7 of 2511
[iginator:
COLLIER IKE Date:
11/16/09 1
Rev:
0j Reviewer:
AJNERA N.
Date:
11/17/09 Aprover:GEORGERT Date:
11/20/09 6.1.2 Loop Function:
STEAM LEAK DETECTION HPCI PIPEWAY 6.1.3 Configuration
Description:
HI DIFFERENTIAL TEMP TRIP 61.4 Loop Instrument List Device II) Number 1
TE-0551NO2RB 2
TE-055--1N0293 3
TIS-0251OIB 6.1.5 Device Dependency Device Environment Power Calibration Radiation 1
A A
A A
2 A
A A
A 3
B B
B B
6. I
. 6 Device Dependency References Environmental :
N/A Power:
N/A Calibration:
N/A Radiation:
N/A 6.1.7 PMA and PMA PEA IR References PMA:
PEA:
IR:
SEE SECTION L2 6l.8 Miscellaneous Random and Bias Effects Dependent Dependent yp_
Magnitude Instrumenj Uncertainty Sl 0.00992 S2 0.00000 S3 0.00000 RI 0.00000 R2 0.00000 R3 0.00000 rence SI:
SEE SECTION 2.2.4 52:
03:
6.1.9 Basis Point of Interest:
Accident:
Pressure Effects:
Function 10 10 S
Number 0
0 0
PEA Effects Magnitude 0. 00000 0. 00000
- 0. 00000 N
N iL Sign N
R N
N N
N N
RI:
R2:
R3:
0 HELB Independent LOOP UNCERTAINTY CALCULATION Loop Nwnber:
TE-055-1N028B 01 J
Page 7 of 25 Originator:
COLLIER KB Date:
11/16/09 I
Rev: a Revietvver:
AJMERA tvI
- Date:
11/17/09 Appro"ver:
GEORGE RT Date:
11/20/09 6. 1. 2 Loop Function:
STEAr1 LEAK DETECTION HPCI PIPEiJ1JAY 6.1.3 Configuration
Description:
HI DIFFERENTIAL TEMP TRIP 6.1.4 Loop Instrument List 2
3 ID Number TE-055-1N028B TE-055-1N029B TIS-025-101B Function 10 10 S
Nwnber oao 6.1.5 Device Dependency 1
2 3
Environment Power Calibration Radiation A
A A
A A
A A
A B
B B
B 6.1.6 Device Dependency References Environmental:
N/A Power:
N/A Calibration:
N/A Radiation:
~
PMA PEA IR Magnitude 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 A/N N
N References Pt<l1A :
PEA:
IR:
SEE SECTION 1.3 6.1.8 Miscellaneous Random and Bias Effects
~
51 82 83 Rl R2 R3 Magnitude 0.00992 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 Dependent Instrument Dependent Uncertainty A/N N'
N N
N
- N N
Sign R
32:
83:
Rl:
R2:
SEE SECTION 2.2~4 6. 1.. 9 Ba.sis terest:
LOOP UNCERTAINTY CALCULATION
[Lop Number:
TE-055--1N028B 01 1
Page 8 of 25 Originator:
COLLIER KB Date:
11/16/09 Rev:
0 Reviewer:
AJMERA M.
Date:
11/17/09 Approver:
GEORG RT pate:
11/20/09 6.2 Device Effects 6
. 2
. 1 Device Accuracy (CA)
CA va/S or Setting Tolerance (whichever is greater)
Where:
va
= vendors stated accuracy S
instruments calibrated span R
- instruments range 6.2.1.1 TE055-1N0283 va
= 075%*S*066 S
= 300 R
=
3.500e+002 Setting tolerance
=
0.00000 CA 0.00495 6.2.1.2 TE055-1N0293 va
= 0.75%*S*0.66 S
= 300 R
=
3.500e+002 Setting tolerance
=
0.00000 CA
= 0.00495 6.2.1.3 TIS0251O1B va l.0%*S*0.66 S
=
300 R
=
3.500e+/-002 Setting tolerance
=
0.00000 CA
= 0.00660 6.2.2 Device M&TE Allowance MTE CA
+/- margin Where:
CA
= device calibration accuracy margin
= additional margin supplied by calculation originator 6.2.2.1 TE-055lN028B CA
= 0.00495 Margin 0.00000 MTE 0.00495 6.2.2.2 TE-055-1N029B CA
= 0.00495 Margin
=
000000 MTE
= 0.00495 6.2.2.3 TlS025l0iB CA
= 0.00660
?4arin
=
0.00000 LOOP Ur-JCERTAINTY CALCUL1~rrION Loop :Number:
rrE-055-1N028B 01 I
Page 8 of 25 Originator:
COLLIER KB Date:
11/16/09 I
Rev: a Reviewer:
AJMERA M.
Date:
11/17/09 Approver:
GEORGE RT Date:
11/20/09 6.2 Device Effects 6.2.1 Device Accuracy (CA)
CA va/S or Setting Tolerance (whichever is greater)
VJhere:
va S
R 6.2.1.1 vendor's stated accuracy instrument's calibrated span instrument's range TE-055-1N028B va
- 0.75%*8*0.66 S
300 R:::::
3.500e+002 Setting tolerance CA
- 0.00495 0.00000 6.2.1.2 TE-055-1N029B va
- 0.75%*8*0.66 S ::: 300 R:::
3.500e+002 Setting tolerance CA = 0.00495 0.00000 6.2.1.3 TIS-025-101B va
- 1.0%*5*0.66 S
- 300 R::::
3.500e+002 Setting tolerance CA
- CA
+ margin Where:
CA margin 6.2.2.1
- device calibration accuracy additional margin supplied by calculation originator TE-055-1t-J028B CA
=: 0.00495 0.00000 r1TE
- 0.00495 6~2.2.2 TE-055-1N029B 025--1 0.00000
1QQp UNCE1TAINT CALCULATION Loop Number:
TE055-1N0283 01 1
Page 9 of 25 Originator:
CQLLIER KB Date:
11/16/09 Rev:
0 Reviewer:
AJMERA N.
Date:
11/17/09 Approver:
GEORGE RT Date:
11/20/09 MTE
= 0.00660 6.2.3 Device Drift D
= vd
(
(tc 4
l.25
/
td)
)
I s
Where:
vd
= vendors stated drift specification td
= vendors drift time specification tc instruments calibration period S
= instruments calibrated span R
instruments range 6.2.3.1 TE-0551N028B vd
= 0.0 td
= 1.0 tc
=
731 S
=
300 R
=
3.500e+002 0
= 0.00000 6.2.3.2 TE-055-1NO29B vd 0.0 td
= 1.0 tc 732 S
= 300 R
=
3.500e+002 D
0.00000 6.2.3.3 TIS-025101B vd
= 0.233%*S*0.66 td
= 31.
tc
=
731 S
- 300 R
3.500e+002 D
= 0.00835 6.2.4 Device Static Pressure SPE
= q (SPz
+ SPs 2
)
(for independent pressure effects)
=
SPz
+
SPs (for dependent pressure effects)
SPz SPZ P0 Pc 7
S SPs SP5 Po Pc
/
S Where:
SPz
= vendors stated zero static pressure effect SPs vendors stated span static pressure effect P0
= normal operating pressure Pc calibrated pressure S
instruments calibrated span K
= instruments range Note: Static pressure effects are relevant to sensors only.
624i TE05IN028B sPS
= 0.0 LOOP UNCEHTAINTY CALCULATION Loop Nlilllber:
rrE-055-1N028B 01 I
Page 9 of 25 Originator:
COLLIER KB Date:
11/16/09 I
Rev:
0 Reviewer:
AJMERA M.
Date:
11/17/09 Aoprover:
GEORGE RT Date:
11/20/09 r4TE
- =
O. 0a6 6 0 6. 2. 3 Device Drift D
=: vd
{
(tc* 1.25
/
td)
)
/
s vJhere:
vd td tc S
R 6.2.3.1 vendor's stated drift specification vendor's drift time specification instrument's calibration period instrument's calibrated span instrument's range TE-055-1N028B vd 0.0 td 1.0 tc 731 S
300 R
3.500e+002 D
0.00000 6.2.3.2 TE-055-1N029B vd 0.0 td 1.0 tc 732 S
300 R
3.500e+002 D
0.00000 6.2.3.3 TIS-025-101B vd 0.233%*8*0.66 td 31.
tc 731 S
300 R
3.500e+002 D
0.00835 6.. 2.4 Device Static Pressure SPE SPE Spz SPs (SPZ 2
+ SPs 2
)
(for independent pressure effects)
Spz
+ SPs (for dependent pressure effects) spz ipO
- pcl I
S SPs
- Ipo - Pc
/
S SPs Po Pc R
- Note: Static 6"
0.0 stated stated 055~lN028B pressure effect pressure effect span fects are relevant to sensors
LOOP* UNCERTAINTY CALCULATION Loop Number:
TE-055--1N0283 01 1
Page 10 of 25 Originator:COLLIERKB Date:
11/16/09 1
Rev:
0 Reviewer:
AJMERA M.
Date:
11/17/09 Approver:
GEORGE RT Date:
11/20/09 spz
= oo P0
=
0.00 Pc
= 0.00000 S
=
300 R
=
3.500e+002 SPs
= 0.00000 SPz 0.00000 SPE
= 0.00000 6.2.4.2 TE0551N029B sps
= 0.0 spz 0.0 P0
=
0.00 Pc
= 0.00000 S
=
300 R
3.SOOe+002 SPs 0.00000 SPz
= 0.00000 SPE
= 0.00000 6.2.4.3 TIS-025-1OIB Sensor is not Y
(see attachment 9) 6
. 2
. 5 Device Over Pressure OPE vope IPa Pmj I
S (for linear devices>
OPE
= vope I
S (for non-linear devices)
Where:
vope
= vendors stated over pressure effect Pa
= maximum operating pressure Pm instruments design pressure S
- instruments calibrated span R
- instruments range K
=
Pa Pm Note:
Over pressure effects are relevanL to sensors only, where the maximum operating pressure is greater than instruments design pressure.
6.2.5.1 TE-055--1N028B vope 0.0 Pa
=
0.00 Pm
=
0.00 S
300 R
=
3.500e+002 OPE 0.00000 6.2.5.2 TE0551N029B vope 0.0 Pa
=
0.00 Pm
=
0.00 S
=
300 R
=
3,300et002 OPE
= 0,00000 6.2.5.3 T1S-025IOIB LOOP UNCERTAINTY CALCULATION Loop Number:
TE-055-1N028B 01 I
Page 10 of 25 Originator:
COLLIER KB Date:
11/16/09 I
Rev: a Revie1llTer:
AJMERA M.
Date:
11/17/09 Approver:
GEORGE RT Date:
11/20/09 SPZ 0.0 Po 0.00 Pc 0.00000 S
300 R
3.500e+002 SPs 0.00000 spz 0.00000 SPE 0.00000 6.2.4.2 TE-055-1N029B SPS
== 0.0 SPZ
- 0.0 Po =
0.00 Pc
- 0.00000 S
== 300 R
==
3.500e+002 SPs 0.00000 spz 0.00000 SPE 0.00000 6.2.4.3 TIS-025-101B Sensor is not
'Y' (see attachment 9).
6. 2. 5 Device Over Pressure OPE
== vope Ipa -
Pml I
S OPE
== vope /
S (for linear devices)
(for non-linear devices)
Where:
vope Pa Pm S
R X
vendor'S stated over pressure effect maximum operating pressure instrument's design pressure instrument's calibrated span instrument's range
!pa - Pml Note:
Over pressure effects are relevant to sensors only, where the maximum operating pressure is greater than instrument's design pressure.
6.2.5.1 TE-055-1N028B vope = 0.0 Pa 0.00 Pm
~
0,,00 S
=: 300 R
3.500e+002 OPE = 0.00000 6.2.5.2 TE-055 lN029B vope 0.0 0.00 Pm
- o. 00 S
- 300 R
3.
OOe+002 OPE::: 0.00000 6.2.. 3 025-
LOOP UNCERTAINTY CALCULATION Loop Number:
TE-055-1N0283 01 1
Page 11 of 25 Originator:
COLLIER KB Date:
11/16/09 Rev:
0 Reviewer:
AJMERA N.
Date:
11/17/09 An rover:
GEORGE RT Date:
11/20/09 Sensor is not Y
(see attachment 9) 6.26 Device Drift Temperature DTE
= vte dT /
S (for linear devices)
DTE vte 7
S (for non-linear devices)
Where:
vte
- vendor specified temperature effect dT
=
(Normal Temp 68° F)
S
= instruments calibrated span R
= instruments range 62.6.l TE-055-1N028B vte
= 00 S
= 300 R
=
3.500e+002 Normal temp
=
11.00 DTE
= 0.00000 6.2.6.2 TE-055-1NO29B vte
= 0.0 S
=
300 R
=
3.500e+002 Normal temp
=
117.00 DTE
= 0.00000 6.2.6.3 TIS-025--lOlB vte
= 0.0 S
= 300 R
=
3,500e+002 Normal temp 82.00 UTE
= 0.00000 6. 2
. 7 Device Accuracy Temperature ATE
= vte dT /
S (for linear devices)
ATE
= vte /
S (for non-linear devices)
Where:
vte vendor specified temperature effect dT
=
accident temperature
- normal temperaturej S
= instruments calibrated span R
instruments range 6.2.7.1 TE-055-INO28B vte
= 0.0 S
=
300 R
=
3.SOOe+002 Normal temp
=
115,00 Lccident temp 306.83 ATE
= 0.00000 6,2.7.2 TE055lNO29B ite
= 0.0 S.
300 LOOP UNCERTAINTY CALCULATION Loop Nllmber:
TE-055-1N028B 01 I
Page 11 of 25 Originator:
COLLIER KB Date:
11/16/09 I
Rev:
0 Reviewer:
AJiv1ERA M.
Date:
11/17/09 Aopro'ver:
GEORGE RT Date:
11/20/09 Sensor is not t Y' (see attacb..ment 9).
6.2. 6 De1'.Jice Drift Temperature DTE DTE vte
- dT
/
S vte I S
(for linear devices)
(for non-linear devices)
V~Jhere:
vte dT S
R 6.2.6.1 vendor specified temperature effect (Normal Temp -
68° F) instrument's calibrated span instrument's range TE-055-1N028B vte
- = 0.0 S
- = 300 R
==
3.500e+002 Normal temp::=
115.00 DTE
- = 0.00000 6.2.6.2 TE-055-1N029B vte
- = 0.0 S
- 300 R:=
3.500e+002 Normal temp =
117.00 DTE
- 0.00000 6.2.6.3 TIS-025-101B vte = 0.. 0 S
300 R::
3.500e+002 Normal temp =
82.00 DTE
== 0.00000 6. 2. 7 Device Accuracy Temperature ATE ATE vte
'1<:
dT I
s vte I S
(for linear devices)
(for non-linear devices)
'iJhere:
vte dT S
R 6.2.7.
vendor specified temperature effect laccident temperature - normal temperature I instrument's calibrated span instrument's range TE-055-1N028B
- 0.0 00 R:::
3.500e+002 I>Jorrnal 1
.00 Accident 06.83 l~TE 0..
LOOP UNCERTAINTY CALCULATION Loop Number:
TE-055-1N028B 01 1
Page 12 of 25j Originator:
COLLIER KB Date:
11/16/09 I
Rev:
0 Reviewer:
AJMERA N.
Date:
11/17/09 Approver:
GEORGE RT Date:
11/20/09 R
3.500e-i-002 Normal temp 1 1 7
. 00 Accident temp
=
30789 ATE
- 000000 6.2.7.3 TIS-025-1O1B vte 0.0 S
r: 300 R
=
3.500e+002 Normal temp 82.00 Accident temp
=
82.00 ATE 0.00000 6.2.8 Device Humidity HE
=
dH
- vhe /
S (for linear devices>
HE
= vhe I S
(for non-linear devices)
Where:
vhe
= vendors stated humidity specification S
= instruments calibrated span R
= instruments range dH
=
accident humidity
- normal humidity 6.2.8.1 TE-055-1NO28B vhe
= 0.0 S
= 300 R
=
3.500e+002 Acc ident hum
=
100.00 Normal hum
=
9000 HE
= 0.00000 6.2.8.2 TE-055-1N029B vhe 0.0 S
=
300 R
=
3.SOOe+002 Accident hum
=
100.00 Normal hum
=
90.00 HE
= 0.00000 6.2.8.3 TIS025-IO1B vhe 0.0 S
=
300 P
=
3.500e÷002 Accident hum 90.00 Normal hum 9 0
. 00 HE
= 0.00000 6.2.9 Device Accuracy Radiation ARE vre k DeltaRad /
S (for linear devices)
ARE
= vre I S
(for non-linear devices)
Jhere vre vendor specified radiation effect DeltaRad
=
(accident radiation normal radiation)
S
= instrurnentts calibrated span LOOP UNCERTAINTY Cl\\LCULATION Loop Number:
TE-055-1N028B 01 I
Page 12 of 25 Originator:
COLLIER KB Date:
11/16/09 I
Rev: a Reviewer:
AJMERA M.
Date:
11/17/09 Approver:
GEORGE RT Date:
11/20/09 R:=
3.500e+002 Normal temp =
117.00 Accident temp 307.89 ATE
- = 0.00000 6.2.7.3 TIS-025-101B vte 0.. 0 S
- = 300 R =
3.500e+002 Normal temp
- =
82.00 Accident temp 82.00 ATE::;: 0.00000 6. 2. 8 Device Humidi ty HE HE dH
- vhe /
S vhe /
S (for linear devices)
(for non-linear devices)
Where:
vhe S
R dH vendor's stated humidity specification instrument's calibrated span instrument's range laccident humidity -
normal humidity I 6.2.8.1 TE-055-1N028B vhe
- 0.0 S
- 300 R =
3.500e+002 Accident hum 100.00 Normal hum =
90.00 HE = 0.00000 6.2.8.2 TE-055-1N029B vhe
- 0.0 S
- 300 R::::
3.500e+002 Accident hum 100.00 "Normal hum
=
- 90. 00 HE
- = 0.00000 6.2.8.3 TIS-025-101B vhe
- 0.0 S
== 300 R
=:
3.500e+002 Accident hum 90.00 I\\Torrnal hurn 90<< 00 HE
=:
0,,00000
.2.9 Accuracy Radiation vre vre DeltaEad /
/
S (for
(
devices) non-linear devices) vendor feet (accident radiation -
normal t s
\\fJhere:
LOOP NCERTAITV CALCUlATION Loop Number:
TE-055-1N0283 01 1
Page 13 of 25 Originator:
COLLIER KB Date:
11/16/09 Rev:
0 Reviewer:
AJMERA N.
Date:
11/17/09 Approver:
GEORGE RT Date:
11/20/09 R
instruments range 6.2.91 TE-055--1N028B vre
= 0.0 S
=
300 R
=
3.500e+002 Accident rad 4.93000 Normal rad
= 0.90500 ARE
= 0.00000 6.2.9.2 TE-055-1N029B vre
= 0.0 S
=
300 R
=
3.SOOe+002 Accident rad
= 1.76000 Normal rad
= 0.90500 ARE
= 0.00000 6.2.9.3 TIS-0251O1B Environmental qualifier is not Y
(see attachment 5) 6.2.10 Device Seismic VSE SRS vse /
S (for linear devices)
VSE
= vse I S
(for non-linear devices)
Where:
vse
= vendors stated seismic specification S
= instruments calibrated span R
= instruments range SRS
= seismic response envelope 6.2.10.1 TE-055--lN028B Seismic class is not 1
in Pims (see attachment 5) 6.2.10.2 TE055INO29B Seismic class is not 1
In Pims (see attachment 5).
6.2.10.3 TIS-025-lOlB Seismic class is not 1
in Pims (see attachment 5) 6.2.11 Device Power PEE
= pss pse I S
Where:
Use vendors stated power suoply specification oss device power sunplv stability S
instruments calibrated span R
instruments range 6.2.11.1 TE-055INO2BB pse
= 0.0 S
=
300 LOOP UNCERTAIl~TY CALCULATION Loop Number:
rrE-055-1N028B 01 I
Page 13 of 25 Originator:
COLLIER KB Date:
11/16/09 I
Rev:
0 Reviewer:
AJMERA M.
Date:
11/17/09 Approver:
GEORGE RT Date:
11/20/09 R
~ instrument's range 6.2.9.1 TE-055-1N028B vre
~ 0.0 S
- 300 R
- ;:
3.500e+002 Accident rad = 4.93000 Normal rad
- 0.90500 ARE
~ 0.00000 6.2.9.2 TE-055-1N029B vre = 0.0 S = 300 R =
3.500e+002 Accident rad
- 1.76000 Normal rad = 0.90500 ARE = 0.00000 6.2.9.3 TIS-025-101B Environmental qualifier is not ty' (see attachment 5).
6. 2. 10 Device Seismic VSE VSE SRS
- vse /
S vse
/
S (for linear devices)
(for non-linear devices)
Where:
vse S
R SRS vendor's stated seismic specification instrument's calibrated span instrument's range seismic response envelope 6.2.10.1 TE-055-1N028B Seisrnic class is not 11 t in Pims (see attachment 5).
6.2.10.2 TE-055-1N029B Seismic class is not '1' in Pims (see attachment 5).
6.2.10.3 TIS-025-101B Seismic class is not 'it in Pims (see attachment 5).
6.2.11 Device PO~Jer PSE
~ pss
- pse
/
S tf,lhere; pss
'Y""'I1.'r'r',.....,,~r F S R
instrument s range 6.2.11.
OSS-lNO 0,,0 00
LOOP UNCERTAINTY CALCULATION Loop Number:TE-055-1NO2SB 01
[
Page 14 of 2]
Qriginator:
COLLIER KB Date:
11/16/09 1
Rev: QJ Reviewer:
AJMERA M.
Date:
11/17/09 Approver:
GEORGE RT Date:
11/20/09 R
=
3.500e+002 pss 0000 PSE
= 0.00000 6.2.112 TE-055-1N029B pse
= 0.0 S
=
300 R
3.500e÷002 pss
=
0.000 PSE 0.00000 6.2.11.3 TIS-O2-10iB pse
= 0.0 S
= 300 R
=
3.500e+002 pss
- z 12.000 PSE
= 0.00000 7
. 0 RESULTS 7
. 1 Loop Accuracy Allowance (AL)
AL_norm
=A÷OP+SP+PE AL_accid
= AL_norm
+
S (for S
> TE
+
RE
+ AHE)
AL_accid AL_norm
+
+
RE
+
AHE (for S
+ RE
÷ AHE)
Where:
A
=CA 2
=ZATE 2
op
=OPE 2
Sp
=ZSPE 2
RE
=ZARE 2
AHE HE 2
S
=VSE 2
PH
=ZPSE 2
= 0.00009 7.2 Loop Drift Allowance (DL)
DL
=
+
DT Where:
=ZD DT
=ZDTE 2
DL 0.00007 7.3 Loop Calibration Allowance (CL)
CL
=
V
+
M Where:
V
=
(setting o1erance)
M CL
= 000014 LOOP UNCERTAINTY CALCULA'rION Looo Number:
TE-055-1N028B 01 I
Page 1,4 of 25 Oriqinator:
COLLIER KB Date:
11/16/09 I
Rev:
0 Revie\\l..Jer:
AJr1ERA tJj
- Date:
11/17/09 Aporover:
GEORGE RT Date: 11/20/09 R
3.500e+002 pss 0.000 PSE
- 0.00000 6.2.11.2 TE-055-1N029B pse
- 0.0 S
300 R:=
3.500e+002 pss 0.000 PSE
- 0.00000 6.2.11.3 TIS-025-101B pse
- 0.0 S
- 300 R::::
3.500e+002 pss 12.000 PSE
- 0.00000 7. 0 RESULTS 7.1 Loop Accuracy Allowance (AL)
AL_norm AL_accid AL_accid A + OP
+ SP
+ PE AL_norm
+ S AL_norm
+ TE
+ RE
+ AHE (for S > TE
+ RE
+ AHE)
(for S
~ TE
+ RE + AHE)
Where,:
CA 2
LATE';
L OPE 2
L SPE 2
L ARE 2
L HE 2
L VSE 2
L PSE 2
0.00009 7.2 Loop Drift Allowance (DL)
DL
+ DT vJhere:
DE DT DL L
i:
0.00007 CL Loop Calibration Allowance (CL)
\\J +
"(1 V
[1 1:
(set 0.00014 tolerance)
LOOP uNCERTAINTY CALCULATION FLoop Number:
TE055-1NO2SB 01 1
Page 15 of 25 Originator:
COLLIER KB Date:
11/16/09 Rev:
0 Reviewer:
AJMERA M.
Date:
11/17/09 Arover:GEORGERT Date:
11/20/09 7.4 TLU (Positive)TLUp
[IR
+
PMAp
÷ PEAp
+
PCp
+
PMA0
÷ PEA0
+/-
Pco
+
I (AL
+
CL 4-DL
+
PMAr
+
PEAr
+
PCr)
]
span (Negative)TLUn
=
[-
PMAn -
PEAn PCn -
PMAo PEAo PCo
+
(AL÷CL+DL+PMAr+PEAr+PCr)
I
- LQopspan All other variables as previous defined rpgp
= 6.01696 DEGF TLUn
= -601696 DEGF 7.5 NTSP (Increasing)
NTSP limit
+
1-PMAn PEAn PCn PMAo PEAo PCo
+
(1.645 7
sigma)
J (AL
+
CL
+
DL
+
PMAr
+
PEAr
+
PCr)
I Loop span (Decreasing)
= limit
+
[IR
+
PMAp
+
PEAp
+
PCp
+
PMAo
+
PEAo
+
PCo
+
(1.645 1
sigma)
(AL
+
CL
+
DL
+
PMAr
+
PEAr
+ PCr) j Loop span Where limit
= loop analytical or process limit limit
=
113.00 DEGF sigma 2
= 108.05105 DEGF 7.6 ATSP (increasing)
ATSP
= NTSP
+ margin (Decreasing)
ATSP
= NTSP
- margin t4here:
margin
= additional margin supplied by calculation originator margin
= -4.05000 ATSP
= 104.00105 DEGF 7.7 Allowable Value (Decreasing)
A!
limit
+
[IR
+
PMAp
+
PEAp
+
PCp
+
PMAo
+
PEAo
+ Pco
÷ (1.645/sigma) 1 (AL+CL÷PMAr÷PEAr÷PCr>
I
- Loop span (Increasing)
AV lifflit
÷ PMAn PEAn PCn PMAo -
PEAo Pco
+/-
(1.645 /
sigma)
J (AL
+
CL
+
PMAr
+/-
PEAr
+/-
PCr) 1 Loop span All other variables as previously defined.
= 108.50034 DEGF LOOP UNCERTAINTY CALCULATION LOOD Number:
TE-055-1N028B 01 I
Page 15 of 25 Originator:
COLLIER KB Date:
11/16/09 I
Rev:
0 Reviewer:
AJMERA £1.
Date:
11/17/09 Approver:
GEORGE RT Date:
11/20/09 7. 4 TLU (Positive)TLUp (Negative)TLUn
[IR + PMAp
+
PEAp
+
PCp
+
PI~o
+
PEAo
+ Pea
+
(AL
+ CL
+ DL
+
PMAr
+
PEAr
+ Per)
]
- Loop span
[-
P~1An -
PEAn -
pen -
PMAo -
PEAo -
peo
+
(AL
+
CL
+ DL +
pr'1Ar
+
PEAr
+ Per)
]* Loop span All other variables as previous defined.
rrLUp TLUn 6.01696 DEGF
-6.01696 DEGF 7.5 NTSP (Increasing)
NTSP (1.645
/
sigma) limit
+ [-
PMAn -
PEAn -
pen -
PMAo PEAo -
pea
+
(AL
+ CL
+ DL
+ PMAr + PEAr
+ per)
]
- Loop span (Decreasing)
NTSP limit
+
[IR
+ PMAp
+
PEAp
+ PCp
+
PMAo
+ PEAo
+ PCo
+
(1.645
/
sigma)
(AL + CL + DL
+
PMAr + PEAr
+ Per)
]
- Loop span vVhere:
limit limit sigma NTSP loop analytical or process limit 113.00 DEGF 2
108.05105 DEGF 7.6 ATSP (Increasing)
ATSP (Decreasing)
ATSP NTSP
+ margin NTSP - margin Where:
margin
!nargin ATSP additional margin supplied by calculation originator
-4.05000 104.00105 DEGF 7.7 Allowable Value (Decreasing)
AV limit
+
(IR
+
PMAp
+
PEAp
+ PCp
+
PV~o
+ PEAo + Pea
+
{1.645 /
k
~
(AL
+ CL
+
PMAr
+ PEAr
+ Per)
- ' Loop span A'V 1imi t
+.
[~
PtJIP.......1'1 PEAn pen
~
pr~l\\.o -
PEAo Pea
+
(1.
LiS",L
+ CL
+
Per)
]
- Loop span All 108.50034 DEGF ined.
Page_16_of_25 Rev:_0 Station:
LG Unit:
I Responsible Branch:
LEDE Safety Related (Y/N):
Y
==
Description:==
HPCI EQUIPMENT ROOM DELTA TEMPERATURE HIGH System Number:
055 Structure:
RX ENCL Component:
TE-55-1N28/29B TIS-2 Revision
Description:
LOWER AV
& ATSP TO 108.5
& 104.0 PER ECR 09-00438 Vendor Calc Number:
N/A Revision:
NA Other Calculations:
N Provides info TO:
N/A Receives info FROM: LE-0036 LM- 0400 Supercedes:
N/A
- 1. Accident type:
2.
Pressure effects dependent or independent (I/O):
3.
Process increasing, decreasing or neither (I/O/N):
4.
Input point of interest:
5.
Include additional margin for actual setpoint calculation:
- 6. Additional margin to be used:
HELB Independent Increasing 0
Yes LOOP UNCERTAINTY CALCULATION 1LQOP Number:
TE-055-INO2SB 01 1
Qiginator:
COLLIER KB Date:
11/16/09 geviewer:
AJMERA N.
Date:
11/17/09 IApprov.er:
GEORGE RT Date:
11/20/09 ATTACHMENT 1:
Session Data 1001
-2208
-4. 05000 LOOP UNCERTAINTY CALCULATION Loop Number:
TE-055-1N0288 01 I
Page 16 of 25 Originator:
COLLIER KB Date:
11/16/09 I
Rev:
0 Reviewer:
AJMERA M.
Date:
11/17/09 Apnrover:
GEORGE RT Date:
11/20/09 ATTACHMENT 1: Session Data Station:
LG Unit:
1 Responsible Branch:
LEDE Safety Related
{YIN}:
Y
==
Description:==
HPCI EQUIPMENT ROOM DELTA TEMPERATURE -
HIGH System Number:
055 Structure:
RX ENCL Component:
TE-55-1N28/29B TIS-2 Revision
Description:
LOWER AV & ATSP TO 108.5 & 104.0 PER ECR 09-00438 Vendor Calc Number:
N/A Other Calculations: N Provides info TO:
N/A Receives info FROM: LE-0036 LM-0400 Supercedes:
N/A
- 1. Accident type:
-1001
-2208 Revision:
NA HELB 2.
Pressure effects dependent or independent (I/D):
3.
Process increasing, decreasing or neither (l/D/N):
4.
Input point of interest:
5.
Include additional margin for actual setpoint calculation:
- 6. Additional margin to be used:
Independent Increasing o
Yes
-4.05000
E LOOP UNCERTAINT CALCULATION IILp Nurrber:
TE055-1N028B 01 1
Page 17 of 2511
[pginator:
COLLIER KB Date:
11/16/09 1
Rev: QJ EReviewer:
AJMERA M.
Date:
11/17/09 LAProv:
GEORGE RT Date:
11/20/09 : Calculation Results Device TE-055-1N028B TE-055-1N029B TIS-025-lOlB Accuracy 10 0
0.00495 10 0
0.00495 S
0 0.00660 Temperature Normal Accident 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 Additional Margin: -4.05000 DL:
0.00007 CL:
0.00014 Device TE-0551N028B TB 055 1NO 2 9B TIS-025-lOlB F
N SPE 10 0
0.00000 10 0
0.00000 S
0 N/A Red Acc 0. 00000 0
. 00000 N/A Humidity 0.00000 0
. 00000
- 0. 00000 Drift
- 0. 00000 0. 00000 0.00835 M&TE 0
. 00495 0
. 00495
- 0. 00660 Tol 0
. 00000 0
. 00000 0. 00000 Ovr Pres 0. 00000 0
. 00000 N/A Pwr Sn 0
. 00000 0
. 00000 0
. 00000 Seismic N/A N/A N/A Process Concerns Normal Accident Positiy i.gati:Le Offsetting Positiyg Negative Off settiun PMA 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 PEA 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 IR 0.00000 Other 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 Normal TLU*
6.01696 6.01696 AL 0.00009 Loop Results NTSP*
AV*
ATSP Increasing 108
. 05105 108.50034 104
. 00105 Accident 6.01696 6.01696 0. 00009 Decreas ixq N/A N/A N/A Increasing 108. 05105 108
. 50034 104. 00105 Decreasing N/A N/A N/A
- These values are in DEGF LOOP UNCERTAINTY CALCULATION Loop Nurnber:
rrE-055-1N028B 01 I
Page 17 of 25 Oriqinator:
COLLIER KB Date:
11/16/09 I
Rev:
0 Reviewer:
AJMERA M.
Date:
11/17/09 Approver:
GEORGE RT Date:
11/20/09 Attachment 2 : Calculation Results Temperature
£.
N Accuracy Normal Accident Humidity Tal Pwr Supp TE-055-1N028B 10 0 0.00495 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 TE-055-1N029B 10 0 0.00495 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 TIS-025-101B S
0 0.00660 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 1:
N SPE Rad Ace M&TE Drift Ovr Pres Seismic TE-IN028B 10 a 0.00000 0.00000 0.00495 0.00000 0.00000 N/A IrE-055-1N029B 10 0 0.00000 0.00000 0.00495 0.00000 0.00000 N/A TIS-025-101B S
0 N/A N/A 0.. 00660 0.00835 N/A N/A Process Concerns Normal Accident positive Negative Offsetting positive Negative Offsetting PMA 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 PEA 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 IR 0.00000 Other 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 Loop Results TLU*
AL Normal 6.01696
-6.01696 0.00009 Accident 6.01696
-6.01696 0.00009 Increasing Decreasing Increasing Decreasing NTSP*
108.05105 N/A 108.05105 N/A AV*
108.50034 N/A 108.50034 N/A ATSP*
104.00105 N/A 104.. 00105 N/A Additional Margin: -4.05000 DL:
0.00007 CL:
0.00014
- These values are in DEGF
Design/safety Limit
£YEtrE. Lint Originator:
COLLIER KB 0.00 flate:
11/13/09 Revision:
00 I 731 LOOP UNCERTAINTY CALCULATION 9
poop Number:
TE-055-INO2OB I 01 I
Page 18 of 2511 Originator:
COLLIER KB
[ Date:
11/16/09 1
Rev:j Reviewer:
AJMERA M.
I Date:
11/17/09 Approver:
GEORCERT JJate:I1/20/09 ATTACHMENT 3 :
Loop Data Loop Number:
TE-0551N028B Instruments Function Num 1
2 3
4 5
6 7
8 9
10 TE-055-1N028B 10 0
X X
TE-055-1N029B 10 0
X X
TIS-025-1O1B S
0 K
TIS025--IOIB 2
0 X
0 0
0 0
0 0
Configuration Descriptions 1:HI DIFFERENTIAL TEMP TRIP 6:
2 :
DIFFERENTIAL TEMP IND 7:
3:
8:
4:
9:
5:
10:
Loop
Description:
STEAM LEAK DETECTION HPCI PIPEWAY Originator:
COLLIER KB Date:
11/12/09 Revision:
00 ATTACHMENT 4:
Loop Calibration Data Loop Number:
TE055-1N0283 Configuration:
01 Units Mm Max NQ.rmaL__
Trip Process Temperature 000 0.00 0.00 0.00 Process Radiation 0.000e÷000 0.000e+000 0.000e+000 O.000e+000 Process Humidity 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Process Pressure 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Loop Span DEGF
-150.00 150.00 Sigma:
2 Value Units Value Setpoint 104.00 DEGF Loop Setting Limit 0.000 Reset 3.00 DEGF LoopLeave Alone Zone 3.000 Aliowabl i.p.5.
DEGF Loop Calculation Acc 0.000 Calibration Frequency
113.00 DEGF
=
=------------
LOOP UNCERTAINTY CALCULATION LOOD Number:
TE-055-1r-J028B 01 I
Page 18 of 25 Originator:
COLLIER KB Date:
11/16/09 I
Rev:
0 Reviewer:
AJ11ERA tJ!.
Date:
11/17/09 Appro'ver:
GEORGE RT Date:
11/20/09 ATTACHMENT 3:
Loop Data Loop Number:
TE-055-1N028B Instruments Function Num 1
2 3
4 5
6
'7 8
9 10 TE-055-1N028B IO 0
X X
TE-055-1N029B IO 0
X X
TIS-025-101B S
0 X
TIS-025-101B 2
0 X
a 0a 0
0 0
Configuration Descriptions 1 :
HI DIFFERENTIAL TEMP TRIP 6 :
2 :
DIFFERENTIAL TEMP IND 7 :
3 :
8 :
4 :
9 :
5 :
10:
Loop
Description:
STEAM LEAK DETECTION HPCI PIPEWAY Originator:
COLLIER KB Date:
11/12/09 Revision:
00 ATTACHMENT 4:
Loop Calibration Data Loop Number:
TE-055-1N028B Configuration:
01 Units Min Max Normal Trip Process Temperature 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Process Radiation O.OOOe+OOO O.OOOe+OOO O.OOOe+OOO O.OOOe+OOO Process Humidity 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Process Pressure 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Loop Span DEGF
-150.00 150.00 Sigma:
2 Value Units Value Setpoint 104.00 DEGF Loop Setting Limit 0.000 Reset 3.00 DEGF Loop Leave Alone Zone 3.000 Allowable 108.5 DEGF Loop Calculation Ace 0.000 Design/safety Limit 0.00 Calibration Frequency 731 j\\nalytical/Proc Limit 113.00 DEGF COLLIER KB Date; 11/13/09 Revision:
00
LOOP UNCERTAINTY CALCULATION 1
Number:
TE-055-1N028B 01 1
Page 19 of Originator:
COLLIER KB Date:
11/16/09 I
Rev:
0 Reviewer:
AJMERA M.
Date:
11/17/09 prover:GE0RGE RT Date:
11/20/09 ATTACHMENT 5 :
Ins trurnent Data Component Id:
TE-055-1N028B I Facility:
LG I Unit:
I
[ System:
055
==
Description:==
HPC1 COMPARTMENT LEAK DETECTION Function:
10 0
LEAK DET SHOWN QNP&ID 25 Type:
I B
IManufacturer Code:
P427 IModel.#:
102-9039 Location:
015177109 I Elevation:
177 1 Area:
015 1 Serial :
01116 QA Class:
Q Op Time:
1 1 Service Life:
40 I EQ; Y
[ Seismic Class:
Tech Spec:
Y Tech Spec Ret: T33.2-I Transient:
NA Reg Guide 1.97:
N 24.E
[
Power Supply Reg:
0.000 I Tolerance:
0O00 Loop Number:
TE-055-1N028B Loop Diagram:
N/A Computer Address:
N/A P&ID:
M-0025 Installation Detail:
N/A Calibration ST:
ST-2-025-405-l Calibration Proc:
ST-2-025-405-l Functional ST:
ST-2-055-61l--l Procedure #:
IC-ll-0000l Response ST:
N/A Other:
Mod Number:
Other:
Signal From:
PROCESS Signal To:
TIS-025-1O1B CH Mod Rev:
A4-l Alarms
& Actions:
N/A Instruction Book:
Input Mm:
50.00 Input Max:
350.00 Input Unit:
DEGF Output Mm:
0.391 Output Max:
8064 Output Unit:
NVDC BC:
0.000 1 Setting Tolerance:
0.00000
[Leave Alone Zone:
0.01000
_C Corrected:
j SP Corrected:
I Add.
Margin:
0.00000 MTE device I
I I
I Period:
731 MTE Accuracy I
I I
HC
Reference:
N/A 1s
Reference:
N/A Originator:
COLLIER KB Date:
11/12/09 Revision:
1 LOOP UNCERTAINTY CALCULATION LOaD Number:
TE-055-1N028B 01 I
Page 19 of 25 Originator:
COLLIER KB Date:
11/16/09 I
Rev:
0 Reviewer:
AJMERA M.
Date:
11/17/09 Approver:
GEORGE RT Date:
11/20/09 ATTACHMENT 5:
Instrument Data Cornponent Id:
TE-055-1N028B I Facility:
LG I Unit:
1 I S'/stem:
055
==
Description:==
HPCI COMPARTMENT LEAK DETECTION IFunction:
10 a LEAK DET --
SHOl/IlN ONP&ID 25 Type:
I E
I iv1anufacturer Code:
P427 I rv10del
- : 102-9039 Location:
015177109 I Elevation:
177 I..~rea:
015 I Serial 01116 QA Class:
Q Op Time:
1 I Service Life:
40 I EQ:
Y I Seismic Class:
Tech Spec:
y Tech Spec Ref: T3.3.2-ITransient:
NA IReg Guide 1.97 :
N 2.4.. E Power Supply Reg:
0.000 I rrolerance:
0.000 Loop Number:
TE-055-1N028B Loop Diagram:
N/A Computer Address:
N/A P&ID:
fv1-0025 Installation Detail:
N/A Calibration ST:
ST-2 025-405-1 Calibration Proc:
ST-2-025-405-1 Functional ST:
ST-2-055-611-1 Procedure # : Ie-l1-0000l Response ST:
N/A Other:
Mod Number:
Other:
Signal From:
PROCESS ISignal To:
TIS-025-10lB CH IMod Rev:
A4-1 Alarms
& Actions:
N/A Instruction Book:
Input Min:
50.00 I Input Max:
350.00 I Input Unit:
DEGF Output Min:
0.391 I Output Max:
8.064 I Output Unit:
MVDC He:
0.000 I Setting Tolerance:
0.00000 I Leave Alone Zone:
0.01000 He Corrected:
I SP Corrected:
I Add. Margin:
0.00000 MTE device I I
I I
I Period:
731 MTE Accuracy I
I I
He
Reference:
N/A SP
Reference:
N/A Originator:
COLLIER KB Date:
11/12/09 Revision:
1
LOOP UCERTAINTZ CALCULATION Loop Number:
TE-O5-iNO28B 01 Page 20 of 25 Originator:
COLLIER KB Dat.e:
11/16/09 j
Rev:
0 Reviewer:
AJMERA M.
Date:
11/17/09 Aprover:
GEORGE RT Date:
1i/20/09 ATTACHMENT 5 :
Ins trument Data Component Id:
TE-055-1N029B I Facility:
LG I Unit:
I Isystem:
055
==
Description:==
HPCI COMPARTMENT LEAK DETECTION I Function:
ID 0
LEAK DET SHOWN ONP&1D 25 I
Type:
I ManufacturerCode:
P427 1Mode 102-9039 Location:
015201288 1 Elevation:
201 Area:
015 1 Serial :
00573 QA Class:
Q Op Time:
1 1 Service Life:
40 1 EQ:
Y I Seismic Class:
Tech Spec:
Y Tech Spec Ref:
T3.3.2 Transient:
NA Reg Guide 1.97:
N 24E PoWer Supply Reg:
0.000 I Tolerance 0000 Loop Number:
TE-055-lN0283 LoopDlagrarn:
N/A Computer Address:
N/A P&ID:
M-0025 Installation Detail:
N/A Calibration ST:
ST-2-025-405-l Calibration Proc:
ST-2-025--405-I Functional ST:
ST2-055-6l1-l Procedure :
ICll--0000l Response ST:
N/A Other:
Mod Number:
Other:
Signal From:
PROCESS Signal To:
T1S025-lOlB CH Mod Rev:
A4-1 Alarms
& Actions:
N/A Instruction Book:
Input Mm:
50.00 InputMax:
350.00 Input Unit:
DEGF Output Mm:
0.391 Output Max:
8.064 Output Unit:
MVDC HC:
0.000 1 Setting Tolerance:
0.00000 1 Leave Alone Zone:
0.01000 HC Corrected:
I SP Corrected:
I Add.
Margin:
0.00000 MTE device I
I I
I Period:
732 MTE Accuracy
- 1 I
I HC
Reference:
N/A I SP
Reference:
N/A Date:
11/12/09 Revision:
1 Originator:
COLLIER KB LOOP UNCERTAINTY CALCULATION Loop Number:
TE-055-1N028B 01 I
Page 20 of 25 Or"iginator:
COLLIER KB Date:
l1i16/09" I
Rev:
0 Revievler:
AJMERA M.
Date:
11/17/09 Approver:
GEORGE RT Date:
11/20/09 ATTACHMENT 5:
Instrument Data Component Id:
TE-055-1N029B I Facility:
LG I Unit:
1 I System:
055
==
Description:==
HPCI CO!'1PARTMENT LEAK DETECTION IFunction:
IO 0
LEAK DET --
SHOWN ONP&ID 25 Type:
I E
I Manufacturer Code:
P427 I ivfodel
- : 102-9039 Location:
015201288 I Elevation:
201 I Area:
015 I Serial 00573 QA Class:
Q Op Time:
1 I Ser"vice Life:
40 I EO:
y I Seismic Class:
Tech Spec:
y Tech Spec Ref:
Ir3.3.2-ITransient:
NA IReg Guide 1.97:
N 2.4.E Power Supply Reg:
0.000 I Tolerance:
0.000 Loop Number:
TE-055-1N028B Loop Diagram:
N/A Computer Address:
N/A P&ID:
M-0025 Installation Detail:
N/A Calibration ST:
ST-2-025-405-1 Calibration Proc:
ST-2-025-405-1 Functional ST:
ST-2-055-611-1 Procedure #:
IC-11-00001 Response ST:
N/A Other:
Mod Number:
Other:
Signal From:
PROCESS ISignal To:
TIS-025-101B CH IMod Rev:
A4-1 Alarms
& Actions:
N/A Instruction Book:
Input Min:
50.00 I Input Max:
350.00 I Input Unit:
DEGF Output Min:
0.391 I Output Max:
8.064 I Output Unit:
MVDC He:
0.000 I Setting Tolerance:
0.00000 I Leave Alone Zone:
0.01000 HC Corrected:
I SP Corrected:
I Add.
Margin:
0.00000 MTE device t I
I I
I Period:
732 MTE Accuracy I
I I
He
Reference:
N/A SP
Reference:
N/A Originator:
COLLIER KB Date:
11/12/09 Revision:
1
Or+/-ginator:
COLLIER KB Date:
11/12/09 Revision:
4 E
LOOP UNCERTAINTY CALCULATION Loop Number:
TE-0%5-1N028B 01 1
Page 21 of 25 Originator:
COLLIER KB Date:
11/16/09 1
Rev:
0 Reviewer; AJMERAM.
Date:
11/17/09 jrover:
GEORERT Date:
11/20/09 ATTACHMENT 5:
Instrument Data I Component Id: TIS-0251013 I Facility:
LG 1ni:
I JSystern:
025 jscription:
STEAM LEAK DETECTION TEMP MONITOR DIV.
2/BI I Function:
S 0
pe:I 1Mnufactrer Code: ç;çso.
1oe1 304A37140004 Location:
008289542 lElevation:
289 1 Area:
008 1 Serial t:
A Class:
Q Op Time:
N/A Service Life:
000
{EQ:
N SeismIC C1ass:
Tech Spec:
Y Tech Spec Ret: T33.2-2.4 jTransient:
NA IReg Guide 1.97:
fpwer Supply Reg:
120,000 I Tolerance:
12.000 Loop Number:
SEE REMARKS Loop Diagram:
N/A Computer Address:N!A P&ID:
M-0025 Installation Detail:
N/A Calibration ST:
ST-2-025-405-1 Calibration Proc:
ST-2-025-405l Functional ST:
SEE REMARKS Procedure It:
1C-ll-00001 Response ST:
N/A Other:
Mod Number:
0ther:
Signal From:
SEE REMARKS j Signal To:
SEE REMARKS I Mod Rev:
Alarms
& Actions:
SEE REMARKS Instruction Book:
N-OOE-68-00024 (GEK-97l46) iput Miri:
50.00 Input Max:
350.00 Input Unit:
DEGF Output Mm:
0 Output Max:
I OutputUnit:
HC:
0.000 1 Setting Tolerance:
0.00000 1 Leave Alone Zone:
0.01.000 HC Corrected:
I SP Corrected:
I Add. Margin:
0.00000 MTE device I
I
.1 Period:
731 MTE Accuracy I
I
Reference:
N/A j SP
Reference:
N/A LOOP UNCERTAINTY CALCULATION Loop Number:
TE-055-1!'J028B 01 I
Page 21 of 25 Originator:
COLLIER KB Date:
11/16/09 I
Rev; 0
RevievJer:
AJMERA M.
Date:
11/17/09 Aoprover:
GEORGE RT Date:
11/20/09 ATTACHMENT 5:
Instrumerlt Data Component Id: TIS-025-101B I Facili ty:
LG I Unit:
1 I System:
025
==
Description:==
STEAM LEAK DETECTION TEMP r10NITOR DIV.
2/Bl I Function:
S 0 Type:
I S
I Manufacturer Code:
G080 I iv10del 304A3714G004 Location:
008289542 I Elevation:
289 I Area:
008 I Serial QA Class:
Q lop Time:
N/A I Service Life:
000 I EQ:
N I Seismic Class:
Tech Spec:
y I Tech Spec Ref: T3.3.2-2.4 I rrransient:
NA I Reg Guide 1.97:
N PO",Jer Supply Reg:
120.. 000 I Tolerance:
12.000 Loop Number:
SEE REMARKS Loop Diagram:
N/A Computer Address:
N/A P&ID:
M-0025 Installation Detail:
N/A Calibration ST: ST-2-025-405-1 Calibration Proc:
ST-2-025-405-1 Functional ST:
SEE REMARKS Procedure it : Ie-i1-00001 Response ST:
N/A Other:
Mod Number:
Other:
Signal From:
SEE REMARKS I Siqnal To:
SEE REMARKS I Mod Rev:
Alarms
& Actions:
SEE REMARKS Instruction Book:
N-OOE-68-00024 (GEK-97146 )
Input Min:
50.00 I Input Max:
350.00 I Input Unit:
DEGF Output Min:
0 I Output Max:
1 I Output Unit:
He:
0.000 I Setting Tolerance:
0.00000 I Leave Alone Zone:
0.01000 He Corrected:
I SP Corrected:
I Add. Margin:
0.00000 MTE device I I
I I
I Period:
731 MTE Accuracy J
I I
I He
Reference:
N/A SP
Reference:
N/A Originator:
COLLIER KB Date:
11/12/09 Revision:
4
LOOP tJNCERTAINTY CALCULzTIQN Loop Number:
TE-055-1N028B 01 1
Page 22 of 25 Originator:
COLLIER KB Date:
11/16/09 1
Rev:
0 Reviewer:
AJMERA M.
Date:
11/17/09 Approver:
GEORGE RT Date:
11/20/09 ATTACHMENT 6:
Vendor Data Manufacturer Code:
P427 Model 4t:
102-9039 Function:
10 0
Reference REFLECTS 2
SIGMA VALUE (CAC# LE-0065)
I 5.000e÷001 IMax L3.500e+002 I Units DEGF I Pressure I 0
. 00 Accuracy Information Accuracy 0.75%*S*0.66 Seismic 0.0 Temperature q
0 Radiation 0.0 Over Pressure 0.0 Humidity 0.0 Drift 0.0 Time Power Supply 0.0 Sure Zero 0.0 J Pressure Span I 0.0 Originator:
KINCAID SC Date:
07/06/01 Revision:
00 ATTACHMENT 6:
Vendor Data Manufacturer Code:
P427 Model 102-9039 Function:
10 0
Reference:
REFLECTS 2
SIGMAVALUE (CALC# LE-0065)
I 5.000e+001
[ Max 3.500e+002 I Units JDEGF I Pressure j
0.00
Accuracy Information Accuracy 0.75%*S*0.66 Seismic 0.0 Temperature 0.0 Radiation 0.0 Over Pressure 0.0 Humidity 0.0 Drift 0.0 Time 1.0 Power Supply 0.0 Pressure Zero 0.0 I Pressure Span
0.0 Originator
KINCAID SC Date:
07/06/01 Revision:
00 LOOP UNCERTAINTY CALCULi\\TION LoaD Number:
TE-a5 5 -l1'J02 8B 01 I
Page 22 of 25 Originator:
COLLIER KB Date:
11/16/09 I
Rev:
0 Reviewer:
AJ1tlERA M.
Date: 11/17/09 Approver:
GEORGE RT Date:
11/20/09 ATTACHMENT 6:
Vendor Data Manufacturer Code:
P427 Model #:
102-9039 Function:
10 0
Reference:
REFLECTS 2
SIG1"1A VALUE (CALC# LE-0065)
M:in I 5.000e+001 I Max I 3.500e+002 I Units I DEGF I Pressure I 0.00 Accuracy Information Accuracy 0.75%*8*0.66 Seismic 0.0 Temperature 0.. 0 Radiation 0.0 Over Pressure 0.0 Humidity 0.0 Drift 0.0 Time 1.0 Power Supply 0.0 Pressure Zero 0.0 I Pressure Span I 0.0 Originator:
KINCAID SC Date:
07/06/01 ATTACHMENT 6:
Vendor Data Revision:
00 Manufacturer Code:
P427 Model #:
102-9039 Function:
IO 0
Reference:
REFLECTS 2 SIGMA VALUE (CALC# LE-0065)
Min I 5.000e+00l I Max I 3.500e+OO2 J Units I DEGF I Pressure I 0.00 Accuracy Information Accuracy 0.75%*8*0.66 Seismic 0.0 Temperature 0.0 Radiation 0.0 Over Pressure 0.0 Humidity 0.0 Drift 0.0 Time 1.0 Po"/er Supply 0.0 Pressure Zero 0.0 I Pressure Span I o. 0 Originator:
KINCAID SC Date:
07/06/01 Revision:
00
LOOP UNCERTAINTY CALCULATION Number:
TE-055-1N0283 01 1
Page 23 of J Originator:
COLLIER KB Date:
11/16/09 1
RvQj Reviewer :
AJMERA M.
Date :
1 1 7 1 7 7 0 9 prover:
GEORGE RT Date:
i1/23!O9.
ATTACHMENT 6 :
Vendor Data Manufacturer Code:
G080 Model 304A3714G004 Function:
S 0
Reference:
GEK-97146, NE-68--24; REFLECTS 2
SIGMA VALUES (CALC LE-0036) 3n I
5
. 000e+001 I Max I
3 500e+002 I Units I DEGF I Pressure I P.00
Accuracy 1.0%*S*066 Seismic 0.0 Temperature 0.0 Radiation 0.0 Over Pressure 0.0 Humidity 0.0 Drift 0.233%*S*0,66 Time
- 3.
Power Supply 0.0 Pressure Zero 0.0 Pressure Span I 0.0 Originator:
THOMAS RT Date:
04/18/94 Revision:
00 LOOP UNCERTAI~ITY CALCULATION Loop Number:
TE-055-1N028B 01 I
Page 23 of 25 Originator:
COLLIER KB Date:
11/16/09 I
Rev:
0 Reviewer:
AJ"MERA M.
Date:
11/17/09 Approver:
GEORGE RT Date:
11/20/09 ATTACHMENT 6: Vendor Data Manufacturer Code:
G080 Model #:
304A3714G004 Function:
S 0
Reference:
GEK-97146, NE-68-24; REFLECTS 2 SIGMA VALUES (CALCtf LE-0036)
Min I 5.. 000e+OOl I Max I 3.500e+OO2 I Uni ts I DEGF t Pressure I 0.00 Accuracy Information Accuracy 1.0%*8*0.66 Seismic 0.0 Temperature 0.0 Radiation 0.0 Over Pressure 0.0 Humidity 0.0 Drift 0.233%*5*0.66 Time 31.
Power Supply 0.0 Pressure Zero 0.0 I Pressure Span 10.0 Originator:
THOMAS RT Date:
04/18/94 Revision:
00
II Ii Seismic Response Envelope:
0.00 H
H H
H H
z LOOP UNCERTAINTY CALCULATION Loop Number:
TE-055-1N028B 01 1
Page 24 ofi 25JJ Originator:
COLLIER KB Date:
11/16/09
[
Rev:
0 Jj Reviewer:
AJMERA M.
Date:
11/17/09 Arover:
GEORGE RT Date:
11/20/09 ATTACHMENT 7:
Location Data Location Code:
015177109
==
Description:==
UNIT 1
HPCI PUMP COMPT REVISED BASED ON 94-08691 Mnimurn Normal Trip LOCA Trip HELB Trip MSLB Maximum Temp 65.00 115.00 176.00 306.83 306.83 115.00 Radiation 2.S8OetOO 9050e+05 4.930e+06 4.930e+06 4.930e÷06 9.050e+05 Humidity 50.00 90.00 90.00 100.00 100.00 90.00 Pressure
- ,14.69 14.70 17.64 17.64 14.69 Seismic Response Envelope:
0.00 Originator:
GEORGE R
T Date:
10/29/96 Revision:
02 ATTACHMENT 7:
Location Data Location Code:
015201288
==
Description:==
UNIT 1
HPCI PIPING AREA r
Minimum Normal Trip LOCK Trip HELB Trip Maxim L
Temp 65.00 117.00 120.00 307.89 307.89 117.00 LRadiatin 2.580e+00 9.050e+05 l.760e+06 l.760e+06 l.760e+06 9.050e+05 I
Humidity 50.00 90.00 90.00 100.00 100.00 90.00 Lpressure
- 14.69 14.69 14.70 21.34 21.34 14.69 Seismic Response Envelope:
0.00 Originator:
THOMAS RT Date:
05/02/94 Revision:
00 ATTACHMENT 7: Location Data Location Code:
008289542
==
Description:==
ROOM 542, AUXILIARY EQUIPMENT ROOM Minimum Normal Trip LOCA Trip HELB Trip MSLB Maximu9 Temp 60.00 82.00 82.00 82.00 82.00 82.00j adiation 5.000e-04 l.760e÷02
- 1. 890e+02 l.760e+02 l.760e÷02 l.760e+02
[j{umidity 30.00 90.00 90.00 90.00 90.00 90.00 I
Pressure 14.70 14.70 14.70 14.70 14.70 14.70 Originator:
CAROLAN JF Date:
03/31/93 Revision:
00 LOOP UNCERTAINTY CALCULArrION Loop Number:
TE-055-1N028B 01 I
Page 24 of 25 Originator:
COLLIER KB Date:
11/16/09 I
Rev: a Reviewer:
AJMERA r"1.
Date:
11/17/09 Approver:
GEORGE RT Date:
11/20/09 ATTACHMENT 7: Location Data Location Code:
015177109
==
Description:==
UNIT 1 HPCI PUMP COMPT -
REVISED BASED ON 94-08691 Minimum Normal Trip LOCA Trip HELB rrrip r~SLB
!1aximum Temp 65.00 115.00 176.00 306.83 306.83 115.00 Radiation 2.580e+OO 9.050e+05 4.930e+06 4.930e+06 4.930e+06 9.050e+05 Humidity 50.00 90.00 90.00 100.00 100.00 90.00 Pressure 14.69 14.69 14.70 17.64 17.64 14.69 Seismic Response Envelope:
0.00 Originator:
GEORGE R T Date:
10/29/96 ATTACHMENT 7: Location Data Revision:
02 Location Code:
015201288
==
Description:==
UNIT 1 HPCI PIPING AREA Minimum Normal Trip LOCA Trip HELB Trip MSLB Maximum Temp 65.00 117.00 120.00 307.89 307.89 117.00 Radiation 2.580e+00 9.050e+05 1.760e+06 1.760e+06 1.760e+06 9.050e+05 Humidity 50.00 90.00 90.00 100.00 100.00 90.00 Pressure 14.69 14.69 14.70 21.34 21.34 14.69 Seismic Response Envelope:
0.00 Originator:
THOMAS RT Dat e :
0 5 / 02 / 9 4 ATTACHMENT 7: Location Data Revision:
00 Location Code:
008289542
==
Description:==
ROOM 542, AUXILIARY EQUIPMENT ROOM Minimum N'orrna1 Trip LOCA Trip HELB Trip MSLB Maximum Ternp 60.00 82.00 82.00 82.00 82.00 82.00 Radiation 5.000e-04 1.760e+02 1.890e+02 1.760e+02 1.760e+02 1.760e+02 Humidity 30.00 90.00 90.00 90.. 00 90.00 90.00 Pressure 1/1.70 14.70 14.70 14.70 14.70 14.70 Seismic Response Envelope:
0.00
~~g.~~~~~~: CAROLAN JF Date:
03/31/93 Revision:
00
F LOOP UNCERTAINTY CALCULATION Loop Number:
rFEO55_1N023B 01 1
Page 25 oL 25 Originator:
COLLIER KB Date:
11/16/09 1
Rev:
0 Reviewer:
AJMERA M.
Date:
11/17/09 Approver:
GEORGE RT Date:
]4J20/09 ATTACHMENT 8:
Process Concerns Contribution to Consideration Uncertainty iqA Li Consideration Re f erenc e 1
PMA 000000 N
Dependent Dependent 2
PEA 0.00000 N
Device Uncertainty 3
IR 000000 SEE SECTION 1.3 4
51 0.00992 R
N SEE SECTION 2.2.4 5
52 0.00000 N
6 S3 0.00000 N
7 RI 0.00000 N
8 R2 0.00000 N
9 R3 0.00000 N
ATTACHMENT 9 :
Device DependencIes Dependency Static Calibration Devices Function y Pwr Cal Rad Pressure Humid Sensor TE-0551N0283 10 0
A A
A A
0.00000 90.00 Y
TE-055-lN029B 10 0
A A
A A
0.00000 90.00 Y
TIS-0251O1B S
0 B
B B
B 0.00000 90.00 N
endencv Ref erences Env:
N/A Cal:
N/A Pwr:
N/A Rad:
N/A Cal Condition:
N/A Just:
Maximum Normal Humidity for Location Code LOOP UNCERTAINTY CALCULATION Loop Number:
rrE-055-1N028B 01 I
Page 25 of 25 Oriqinator:
COLLIER KB Date:
11/16/09 I
Rev: ° RevieT.pJer:
AJMERA rv1.
Date:
11/17/09 Anprover:
GEORGE RT Date:
11/20/09 ATTACHMENT 8:
Process Concerns Contribution to Consideration Uncertainty Sign A/N Consideration References 1
PMA 2
PEA 3
IR 4
81 5
82 6
53 7
Rl 8
R2 9
R3 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00992 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.. 00000 0.00000 R
N N
N N
N N
N N
Dependent Dependent Uncertainty SEE SECTION 1.3 SEE SECTION 2.2.4:
Devices TE-055-1N028B TE-055-1N029B TIS-025-101B ATTACHMENT 9 : Device Dependencies Dependency Static Calibration Function Env Pwr Cal Rad Pressure Humid Sensor IO a
A A
A A
0.00000 90.00 y
IO 0
A A
A A
0.00000 90.00 y
S 0
B B
B B
0.00000 90.00 N
Dependency References Env:
N/A Rad:
N/A Cal:
~J/A Cal Condition:
N/A Pwr:
N/A Just:
Maximum Normal Humidity for Location Code