ML103490663

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Final Qa/Related Forms (Folder 1)
ML103490663
Person / Time
Site: Seabrook NextEra Energy icon.png
Issue date: 12/10/2010
From: David Silk
Operations Branch I
To: Momm E
NextEra Energy Seabrook
Hansell S
Shared Package
ml1018870654 List:
References
TAC U01694
Download: ML103490663 (15)
v • d • e


Text

ES-201 Examination Preparation Checklist Form ES-201-1 Facility: S~hro<lk Date of Examination: It t2-~ILI'I Developed by: Written - Facility 1ir'NRC /I Operatin~1 - Facility L>r NRC Target Chief Date* Task Description (Reference) Examiner's Initials

-180 1. Examination administration date confirmed (C.1.a; C.2.a and b) ~

-120 2. NRC examiners and facility contact assigned (C.1.d; C.2.e) ~

-120 3. Facility contact briefed on security and other requirements (C.2.c) ~

-120 4. Corporate notification letter sent (C.2.d) ~

[-90} [S. Reference material due (C.1.e; C.3.c; Attachment 3)} ~

{-7S} 6. Integrated examination outline(s) due, including Forms ES-201-2, ES-201-3, ES-301-1, ES-301-2, ES-301-S, ES-D-1's, ES-401-1/2, ES-401-3, and ES-401-4, as applicable (C.1.e and f; C.3.d) J1

{-70} {7. Examination outline(s) reviewed by NRC and feedback provided to facility licensee (C.2.h; C.3.e)} ~

{-45} 8. Proposed examinations (including written, walk-through JPMs, and

~

scenarios, as applicable), supporting documentation (including Forms ES-301-3, ES-301-4, ES-301-5, ES-301-6, and ES-401-6, and any Form ES-201-3 updates), and reference materials due (C.1.e, f, g and h; C.3.d)

~

-30 9. Preliminary license applications (NRC Form 398's) due (C.1.1; C.2.g; ES-202)

-14 10. Final license applications due and Form ES-201-4 prepared (C.1.1; C.2.i; ES-202) JYc1-.

-14 11. Examination approved by NRC supervisor for facility licensee review (C.2.h; C.3.f) v;i

-14 12. Examinations reviewed with facility licensee (C.1.j; C.2.f and h; C.3.g) (1/4

~

-7 13. Written examinations and operating tests approved by NRC supervisor (C.2.i; C.3.h)

-7 14. Final applications reviewed; 1 or 2 (if >10) applications audited to confirm qualifications I eligibility; and examination approval and waiver letters sent (C.2.i; Attachment S; ES-202, C.2.e; ES-204)

JJ

-7 15. Proctoringlwritten exam administration guidelinEis reviewed with facility licensee (C.3.k)

,~

-7 16. Approved scenarios, job performance measures, and questions distributed to NRC examiners (C.3.i)

,jb

  • Target dates are generally based on facility-prepared examinations and are keyed to the examination date identified in the corporate notification letter. They are for planning purposes and may be adjusted on a case-by case basis in coordination with the facility licensee.

[Applies only} {Does not apply} to examinations prepared by the NRC.

ES-201, Page 25 of 28

ES-201 Examination Outline Quality Checklist Form ES-201-2 Facility: Date of Examination:

Initials Item Task Description a b* C#

1. a. Verify that the outline(s) fit(s) the appropriate model, in accordance with ES-401. [I)..- lliOi-' aJ w

R I

b. Assess whether the outline was systematically and randomly prepared in accordance with Section 0.1 of ES-401 and whether all KiA categories are appropriately sampled. 1"-£/ Jti1A ~

T i T E

c. Assess whether the outline over-emphasizes any systems, evolutions, or generic topics. (c...V ,;W} tn N d. Assess whether the justifications for deselected or rejected KiA statements are appropriate. -rz..v ~11" I/. i-
2. a. Using Form ES-301-5, verify that the proposed scenario sets cover the required number of normal evolutions, instrument and component failures, technical specifications, 1L'-I~ ~

S and major transients.

I M b. Assess whether there are enough scenario sets (and spares) to test the projected number U and mix of applicants in accordance with the expected crew composition and rotation schedule L without compromising exam integrity, and ensure that each applicant can be tested using at least one new or significantly modified scenario, that no scenarios are duplicated flj./ I~ 0L A

i from the applicants' audit test(s), and that scenarios will not be repeated on subsequent days.

T 0

f"" vL

c. To the extent possible, assess whether the outline(s) conform(s) with the qualitative R

and quantitative criteria specified on Form ES-301-4 and described in Appendix D. ~

3. a. Verify that the systems walk-through outline meets the criteria specified on Form ES-301-2:

(1 ) the outline(s) contain(s) the required number of control room and in-plant tasks W distributed among the safety functions as speCified on the form ft.-V" fllt'1V. ~MJ I (2) task repetition from the last two NRC examinations is within the limits specified on the form T (3) no tasks are duplicated from the applicants' audit test(s)

(4) the number of new or modified tasks meets or exceeds the minimums specified on the form (5) the number of altemate path, low-power, emergency, and RCA tasks meet the criteria on the form.

b. Verify that the administrative outline meets the criteria specified on Form ES-301-1:

i (1 ) the tasks are distributed among the topics as specified on the form (2) at least one task is new or significantly modified fCc... tlv} ~

(3) no more than one task is repeated from the last two NRC licensing examinations

c. Determine if there are enough different outlines to test the projected number and mix of applicants and ensure that no items are duplicated on subsequent days.

rz,L /tl11 bU1

'vi'- ~ ~

4. a. Assess whether plant-specific priorities (including PRA and IPE insights) are covered in the appropriate exam sections.

G  !

E b. Assess whether the 10 CFR 55.41/43 and 55.45 sampling is appropriate. (L-v lrtrJ'l* ~

N

c. Ensure that KiA importance ratings (except for plant-specific priorities) are at least 2.5.  !(~l.-Ip ~

E R d. Check for duplication and overlap among exam sections. fl-'- ~ 'tJA-A L e. Check the entire exam for balance of coverage. jl..A--- l'1jA ~

f. Assess whether the exam fits the appropriate job level (RO or SRO).

(U-- V\1'\" 111

~;edN~~e ~

~

a. Author 7' Imp171-</ C. $114'... ./ rv me, ffA.~.......-7. Ar"... "'.....:I*f'/~) ~ :t?t; -  ;;iv  ;.ret'
b. Facility Reviewer (*)

C. NRC Chief Examiner (#) .i1.. ;J ,<ii Ik /4'4-1 JJ!'\ - L ~7ll'D

~ ~(,oLseU / ~c::::--

y

~

d. NRC Supervisor tA. ---=>~

\.. ett; ~~-<.O Note: # Independent NRC reviewer initial items in Column "c"; chief examiner concurrence required.

  • Not applicable for NRC-prepared examination outlines

ATTACBMENT3 Form ES-210-3, Examination Security Agreement V/ttu I~~

ES-201 examination Se,curtty Agrument Form Es-201-3

1. pre-ExJrmIIlAtkm I aclll1tfwledg,e that I haVlS ;acquired spedallZed knowledge about the NRC Ibm.log exoIl11lnationsstl1edlllad for !he weeK{s) of ItshGl as oftnec date afmy slgiflllWrn_ I agre& thai i \'liIl,JOt l<inawingly divulge any imorrnDtioll aoout these examln.aUClflS to MIl' persons who have not elil authorized by 1118 NRC thief e);9miller. I understand ma.t I am not to Instruct, evalUate, orllra'ride performance f1l!13'dl)acl{ to thoSe appIlcams scheduledla be administered thi!S8 Utenslag examinations from t11lls oale umil comPlellon, of examination admInistration,. except as spBcffkaly nCJtecf below ami autoorfZeQ ~ the NRC

~e.g., acting as a :slmulator booth operator or col'llill1unh:alor Is acceptable If tlh~ Individual cIoes not select the tralllinO comei'll or provide direCt ()f inaiNC!

feedbacK). Furthel'l11Ol'e, I am aware (If the' physica!lKI(urjly rm!IlSLrres and requiremellll1 (as document-ed in the facility licens.ae's prooe<lure'S) and onderstand thal violation Qf the oondltloos ,of this agTllWilS11! may result In cancellation of 816 IlxGminalions andier an 9nfofl:emoot aclion againslllOO Of tne t;;lcility licensee. I will mmediateljr report m flu:nity management or the NRC chief examiner al1Y Ildeatlons or sugQ.astions that examinaflioo SBlAirtty may have been !)olilpromisled.

2. post-Exatrtllliit/9D T() Ule II est of nny il:now-isqge, I did oot di'I'Ulge to any,unaulhorlZed pl1ml:l1>ns any lrifolmliltian concerning the NRC licensing examilatklnsaGlllTllsIBred

&mg too wook(s) of f/ 1~"f11(? From the date thai: I !!'ntered IJiIo this sllCurity agreement until \he c.omple1kll1 ofaxamlrnWon administratlon,l diel not instruct, 6¥aluale, Of provide petfmmanD!! 1eedbacll to !bose applicants who 'M!Il! admJrjstered these IlcellsDlg eXlIllJ1inlroons, except as specifically noted below:and authorized by the NRC.

I ~~ jEl;;1 "I.!..:LfiP'V' ~-

~. 'II =;i7.'t EM ... DF- J ""4iJC '. .

~!

.... .' J ' ,'> r "," ,

9.~'! J-(QI'r1:t~'-,. t '~'~ru;~ ' /:_~ jii~

':-,L"'_'

1il. Tr';" a-Ali** 1 tJe.._ cq{.~ -..!Al.J-AiL

11. ~~t~¥~f;f'~:~~H:(4 ~.~ " £?:;.L7..,5/c>

~r?iJidfij£4$  ;;~i~ trtO" , 0!V:/' r; , I 14.::=: MIl.-Jt <<

  • V.,. f kf?.rv{,V a~  !.tk:luA_

15.~I7.zCC:.N;f\-d/'\Gt-rls N<::"S ~ ..i2:!.2:!~

NOTES: fl& ~ "'A_

U,£', 'BoR..$c)/tI  ::r:.~7lWe.'TcL ~ 8/JH(/~ (J-'UtMJ-'- Iz./z.f 'O

~ /L . ,?\Wv"*",Jl.,,, ~~tv~ e')(4:Wt C~ot&Ljol "\t. C_~ t6 htf, 0 fJ~ -,+i-Gp.J 1J-/'1--it()

ES-201. Page 27 of 28 Page 9 of9

~~____________________~~~~~__~~__~________________~__~~P~-~~' 2Dr~

ES*201 Examination Security Agreement Form ES*201*3

1. Pre-Examination I acknowledge that I have acquired specialized knowledge about the NRC licensing examinations scheduled for the week(s) of f/kqo as of the date of my signature. I agree that I will not knowingly divulge any Information about these examinations to any persons who have not been authorized by the NRC chief examiner. I understand that I am not to instruct, evaluate, or provide performance feedback to those applicants scheduled to be administered these licensing examinations from this date until completion of examination administration, except as specifically noted below and authorized by the NRC (e.g., acting as a simulator booth operator or communicator Is acceptable if the Individual does not select the training content or provide direct or indirect feedback). Furthermore, I am aware of the physical security measures and requirements (as documented In the facility Ilcensee's procedures) and understand that vIolation of the conditions of this agreement may result in cancellation of the examinations and/or an enforcement action against me or the facllity licensee. I will immediately report to facility management or the NRC chief examiner any indications or suggestions that examination security may have been compromised.
2. Post*Examinatlon To the best of my knowledge, I did not divulge to any unauthorized persons any Information concerning the NRC licensing examinatIons administered during the week(s) of Ilh1l1c . From the date that I entered into this security agreement until the completion of examination administration, I did not instruct, evaluate, or provide performance feedback to those applicants who were administered these licensing examinations, except as specifically noted below and authorized by the NRC.

PRINTED NAME JOB TITLE I RESPONSIBILITY DATE SIGNATURE (2) DATE NOTE

==~~~~~---n_~(Y~.~~~.)-J-~~:::::::::::~~~~~~=~~D~

~~~~~~ ____ ~&L~~~ ______ ~~~~~~~~====~__ ~ ~~16v~~

~~~-o--

~~

1M lopj tPi.-(lye:,t.-CQN ,~ ___

~O~~~

Wo -JOwi:Uc%1 P W '7hC/¢'u.J f~

'.l:L!::LuJ._ _

J:~

b

£

~fi 4?~rA" wr S-J/Pot"kCQ-1..

£",,~

~I,~

j ~i>ii' / C Ltvl->-Jffe.

7-8°

~

'~7

~

25/10

.= 'aft fJ~wiiin#%1 Itlt/~~t) ta..~ ~.~

Edw ~

_, Z ~

...izJ.~

IAblu.2

.>',;j-;-!,z,tN'+-vL- U/~.:/() ____~.. ~ I a J~} I V Of$ ttJ6tt.. .. /. 1/-Y1v '"-~L IJ-j,f'v

t. cJ.£T :f-/1J"frue14--- /(/-3r1j1o f44v ~v'tN ),)'/iJ.) ID jD6,/lf I~/~O ~~ ~ /;4~~

Facility: C;,G /itiJMtJ/L Date of Examination: /j/J9 /Ii) Operating Test Number:

Initials

1. General Criteria a b* C;#
a. The operating test conforms with the previously approved outline; changes are consistent with sampling requirements (e.g., 10 CFR 55.45, operational importance, safety function distribution). P- 'iII]'. I) W-.
b. There is no day-to...cfay repetition between this and other operating tests to be administered during this examination.

JZt- It" IV tfo*

c. The operating test shall not duplicate items from the applicants' audit test(s), (see Section D.1.a,) pl-. '1Xl'-" ~.
d. Overlap with the written examination and between different parts of the operating test is within acceptable limits.

/Z<- l"ih-' ~.

e. It appears that the operating test will differentiate between competent and less-than-competent jU- ,.AIr U}

applicants at the deSignated license level.

2. Walk-Through Criteria - -- -
a. Each JPM includes the following, as applicable:

initial conditions

.. initiating cues references and tools, including associated procedures reasonable and validated time limits (average time allowed for completion) and specific deSignation if deemed to be time-critical by the facility IicensE~e operationally important specific performance criteria that include: rv ,.Jf- J .

- detailed expected actions with exact criteria and nomenclature system response and other examiner cues statements describing important observations to be made by the applicant criteria fOf successful completion of the task identification of critical steps and their associated performance standards

- restrictions on the sequence of steps, if applicable

b. Ensure that any changes from the previously approved systems and administrative walk-through outlines (Forms ES-301-1 and 2) have not caused the test to deviatl~ from any of the acceptance criteria (e.g., item distribution, bank use, repetition from the last 2 NRC examinations) specified on those forms and Form ES-201-2.

1t.L- I~ J

3. Simulator Criteria -- -- -

The associated simulator operating tests (scenario sets) have been reviewed in accordance with ~U-I ;Jt.-/ ~

Form ES-301-4 and a copy is attached.

Printed Name I SignatlfEr Date

a. Author 71;?Jp j7tt c, (:As5/~2~ /~~ j(.) I S-/O r'
b. Facility Reviewer(*) ~ffl.et..J~ A/Sf' ~ r /.:.;;£!v../~ /o-s-..../o
c. NRC Chief Examiner (#) J)a\l,JSrLt I ~ 11 ~ -az;-Ldll 1ft '1Jlli
d. NRC Supervisor  :<)Q4'I ;laY/:5~e II /~ -? ~

jj /;1,.),

NOTE:

  • The facility signature is not applicable for NRC-developed tests.

'# IndeE!endent NRC reviewer initial items in Column "c"; chief examiner concurrence required.

ES-301, Page 24 of 27

ES-301 Simulator Scenario Quality Checklist Form ES-301-4 Date of Exam:l{t cenario Numbers: 1 I 2 I QUALITATIVE ATTRIBUTES Initials

1. The initial conditions are realistic, in that some equipment and/or instrumentation may be out of service, but it does not cue the operators into expected events.
2. The scenarios consist mostly of related events.
3. Each event description consists of
  • the point in the scenario when it is to be initiated
  • the malfunction(s) that are entered to initiate the event
  • the symptoms/cues that will be visible to the crew
  • the expected operator actions (by shift position)
  • the event termination point (if applicable)
4. No more than one non-mechanistic failure (e.g., pipe break) is incorporated into the scenario without a credible preceding incident such as a seismic event.
5. The events are valid with regard to physics and thermodynamics.
6. Sequencing and timing of events is reasonable, and allows the examination team to obtain complete evaluation results commensurate with the scenario objectives.
7. If time compression techniques are used, the scenario summary clearly so indicates.

Operators have sufficient time to carry out expected activities without undue time constraints.

Cues are given.

8. The simulator modeling is not altered.
9. The scenarios have been validated. Pursuant to 10 CFR 55.46(d), any open simulator performance deficiencies or deviations from the referenced plant have been evaluated to ensure that functional fidelity is maintained while running the planned scenarios.
10. Every operator will be evaluated using at least one new or significanUy modified scenario.

All other scenarios have been altered in accordance with Section 0.5 of ES-301.

11. All individual operator competencies can be evaluated, as verified using Form ES-301-6 (submit the form along with the simulator scenarios).
12. Each applicant will be significantly involved in the minimum number of transients and events specified on Form ES-301-5 (submit the form with the simulator scenarios).
13. The level of difficulty is appropriate to support licensing decisions for each crew position.

Target Quantitative Attributes (Per Scenario; See Section D.5.d)

1. Total malfunctions (5-8) ~r1
2. Malfunctions after EOP entry (1-2)
3. Abnormal events (2-4) 4 I 4
4. Major transients (1-2) 1 /
5. EOPs entered/requiring substantive actions (1-2) 2 /
6. EOP contingenCies requiring substantive actions (0-2) o/
7. Critical tasks (2-3)

ES-301 Simulator Scenario Quality Checklist Form ES-301*4 Facilty: Seabrook Station Date of Exam!~LvScenario Numbers: 4 Operating Test No.:

QUALITATIVE ATIRIBUTES Initials a b* c#

1. The initial conditions are realistic, in that some equipment and/or instrumentation may be out of service, but it does not cue the operators into expected events.
2. The scenarios consist mostly of related events.
3. Each event deSCription consists of
  • the point in the scenario when it is to be initiated
  • the malfunction(s) that are entered to initiate the event
  • the symptoms/cues that will be visible to the crew
  • the expected operator actions (by shift position)
  • the event termination point (if applicable)
4. No more than one non-mechanistic faiture (e.g., pipe break) is incorporated into the scenario without a credible preceding incident such as a seismic event.
5. The events are valid with regard to physics and thermodynamics.
6. Sequencing and timing of events is reasonable, and allows the examination team to obtain complete evaluation results commensurate with the scenario objectives.
7. If time compression techniques are used, the scenario summary clearly so indicates.

Operators have sufficient time to carry out expected activities without undue time constraints.

Cues are given.

8. The simulator modeling is not altered.
9. The scenarios have been validated. Pursuant to 10 CFR 55,46(d), any open simulator performance deficiencies or deviations from the referenced plant have been evaluated to ensure that functional fidelity is maintained while running the planned scenarios.
10. Every operator will be evaluated using at least one new or significantly modified scenario.

All other scenarios have been altered in accordance with Section 0.5 of ES-301.

11. All individual operator competencies can be evaluated, as verified using Form ES-301-6 (submit the form along with the simulator scenarios).
12. Each applicant will be significantly involved in the minimum number of transients and events specified on Form ES-301-5 (submit the form with the simulator scenarios).
13. The level of difficulty is appropriate to support licensing decisions for each crew position.

Target Quantitative Attributes (Per Scenario; See Section D.S.d) Actual Attributes

1. Total malfunctions (5-8) ....6'*7
2. Malfunctions after EOP entry (1-2) 1
3. Abnormal events (2-4) 4
4. Major transients (1-2) 1
5. EOPs entered/requiring substantive actions (1-2) 2
6. EOP contingencies requiring substantive actions (0-2) 0
7. Critical tasks (2-3) VZ

ES-301 Transient and Event Checklist Form ES-301-5 Facility: Seabrook Station Date of Exam: 12/3/2010 Operating Test No.:

A E Scenarios p V 1 2 3 4 Back-up T M P E I L N 0 CREW CREW CREW CREW N I T T POSITION POSITION POSITION POSITION I C A M A T S A B S A B S A B S A B U L

N Y R T 0 R T 0 R T 0 R T 0 M(*)

0 C P 0 C P 0 C P 0 C P T P R I U E

M A

tR((* ler ..),?1 ;2~))~'

NOR. ~~';'.,!~ 1</

Ild,j~)r~l~*~,4'.1.3. 7 12 *.1

2;4.7 .,3,4

,; .1.,<,iJ hi* *.* ***

.). 1 1

IX?I;t*;~

~' I,&(f;:

sru 2,4,5 3.4 S . .. e .,..

~

')'

. ,5 ,7 .'j.>

T T~:' .~

'.' 1);.2; .1;**

  • MAJ: 6 6---+£ 11[1'.

E R

.. ....' ) ' .

.. 2.~,.). ,3,4 X 10 .'

RX 2 1 11 1 0 NOR 1 1 1 1 1 RO-1 I/C 3,4, 3,6,7 7 4 4 2 5,8 MAJ 6 5 2 2 2 1 TS 0 0 2 2 RX 1 1 1 1 0 RO-2 NOR 2 1 1 1 1 I/C 1,3,7 2,4 5 4 4 2 MAJ 6 5 2 2 2 1 TS 0 0 2 2 RX 2 1 1 1 0 RO-3 NOR I/C 3,4, 5,8 1

3,6,7 1 7 1 4 ~I 4

rs-t Instructions:

1.

6 5 Check the applicant level and enter the operating test number and Form E8-D-1 event numbers for each ffilEEl event type; TS are not applicable for RO applicants. ROs must serve in both the "at-the-controls (ATC)"

and "balance-of-plant (BOP)" positions; Instant SROs must serve in both the SRO and the ATC positions, including at least two instrument or component (I/G) malfunctions and one major transient, in the ATC position. If an Instant SRO additionally serves in the BOP position, one IIC malfunction can be credited toward the two IIC malfunctions required for the ATC position.

2. Reactivity manipulations may be conducted under normal or control/ed abnormal conditions (refer to Section D.5.d) but must be significant per Section C.2.a of Appendix D. (*) Reactivity and normal evolutions may be replaced with additional instrument or component malfunctions on a 1-for-1 basis.
3. Whenever practical. both instrument and component malfunctions should be included; only those that require verifiable actions that provide insight to the applicant's competence count toward the minimum requirements specified for the applicant's license level in the right-hand columns.

10f3

ES-301 Transient and Event Checklist Form ES-301-5 Facility: Seabrook Station Date of Exam: 1213/2010 Operating Test No.:

A E Scenarios p V ...

1 2 ~I 4 Back*up T M P E I L N 0 CREW CREW CRIEW CREW N I T T POSITION POSITION POSITION POSITION I C A M A T S A B S A B S A B S A B U L

N Y R T 0 R T 0 R T 0 R T 0 M(*)

0 C P 0 C P 0 C P 0 C P T P R I U E

iRX 1 1 1 1 0 NOR 2 1 1 1 1 R0-4 IIC 1,3, 2,4 5 4 4 2 7

MAJ 6 5 2 2 2 1 TS 0 0 2 2 RX 2 1 1 1 0 NOR 1 1 1 1 1 I/C 3,4,5 3,6,7 7 4 4 2 RO-5

,8 MAJ 6 5 2 2 2 1 TS 0 0 2 2 RX I 1 1 1 I1 0 NOR 2 1 I1 1 1 RO-6 IIC 1,3, 2,4 5 4 4 2 7

MAJ 6 5 2 2 2 1 TS I 0 0 2 12 RX 0 1 1 0 NOR 2 1 2 1 1 1 SRO-U1 IIC 3,4,5 2.4,7 6 4 4 2 MAJ 6 5 2 2 2 1 TS 3,4,5 2,3,4 6 0 2 2 Instructions:

3. Check the applicant level and enter the operating test number and Form ES-O-1 event numbers for each event type; TS are not applicable for RO applicants. ROs must serve in both the "at-the-controls (ATC)"

and "balance-of-plant (BOP)" positions; Instant SROs must serve in both the SRO and the ATC positions, including at least two instrument or component (IIC) malfunctions and one major transient, in the ATC position. If an Instant SRO additionally serves in the BOP position, one lie malfunction can be credited toward the two IIC malfunctions required for the ATC position.

4. Reactivity manipulations may be conducted under normal or controlled abnormal conditions (refer to Section D.5.d) but must be significant per Section C.2.a of Appendix O. (*) Reactivity and normal evolutions may be replaced with additional instrument or component malfunctions on a 1-for-1 basis.
3. Whenever practical, both instrument and component malfunctions should be included; only those that require verifiable actions that provide insight to the applicant's competence count toward the minimum requirements specified for the applicant's license level in the right-hand columns.

20f3

ES-301 Transient and Event Checklist Form ES-301-5

~on Date of Exam: 12/3/2010 Operating Test No . II A E Scenarios p V 1 2 3 4- Backup T M P E I L N 0 CREW CREW CREW CREW N I T T POSITION POSITION POSITION POSITION I C A M A T S A B S A B S A B S A B U L

N Y R T 0 R T 0 R T 0 R T 0 M(*)

0 C P 0 C P 0 C P 0 C P T P R I U E

RX I 0 1 1 SRO-U2 NOR~ 1 2 IIC 3, 2

~6 TS 3,4,51 1

5 2, ,

2 6

1 2

RX I 1 0 1 0 SRO-U3 NOR IIC MAJ 2

3,4,5 6

1 2,4,7 5

2 6

2 4

2 1 1 4

2

+/-]I 1

TS 3,4,5 2,3,4 6 0 2 2 RX 1 1 0 NOR 1 1 1 IIC 4 4 2 MAJ 1= 2 2 1 TS RX

=t= 0 1

2 2 1 10 NOR 1 1 1 IIC 4 4 2 MAJ 2 2 1 TS 0 2 2

5. Check the applicant level and enter the operating test number and Form ES-D-1 event numbers for each event type; TS are not applicable for RO applicants. ROs must serve in both the Uat-the-controls (ATC)"

and "balance-ot-plant (BOP)" positions; Instant SROs must serve in both the SRO and the ATC positions, including at least two instrument or component (IIC) malfunctions and one major transient, in the ATC position. If an Instant SRO additionally serves in the BOP position, one IIC malfunction can be credited toward the two lie malfunctions required for the ATC position.

6. Reactivity manipulations may be conducted under normal or controlled abnormal conditions (refer to Section D.5.d) but must be significant per Section C.2.a of Appendix D. (*) Reactivity and normal evolutions may be replaced with additional instrument or component malfunctions on a 1-for-1 basis.
3. Whenever practical, both instrument and component malfunctions should be included; only those that require verifiable actions that provide insight to the applicant's competence count toward the minimum requirements specified for the applicant's license level in the right-hand columns.

30f3

ES-301 Competencies Checklist Form ES-301-6 Facility: Seabrook Station Date of Examination: 12/3/2010 Operating Test No.

APPLICANTS RO-1 RO-2 RO-3 RO-4 Competencies SCENARIO

~

I SCENARIO S@ARltI SCENARIO 1/ 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 1'1 I-- .

  • 3 1 2 3 4 InterpretiDiagnose 4,5, 3,5,  ! 3,6, 2,4, 4,5, 3,5, 3,6, 2,4, Events and Conditions 8 6,7 7 5 8 6,7 7 5 Comply With and 2,4, 1,5, 2,3 1,2, 2,4, 1,5, 2,3 1,2, 5,6, 7 6,7 4,5 5,6, 7 6,7 4,5 Use Procedures (1) 8 8 Operate Control 2,4, 1,3, 1,2, 1,2, 2,4, 1,3, 1,2, 1,2, 5,6, 5,6, 7 4,5 5,6, 5,6, 7 4,5 Boards (2) 8 7 8 7 Communicate 2,4, 13, 2,3, 1,2, 2,4, 13, 2,3, 1,2, 5,6, 5,6, 6,7 4,5 5,6, 5,6, 6,7 4,5 and Interact 8 7 8 7 Demonstrate NA NA NA NA NA INA I NA NA Supervisory Abilitv (3)

Comply With and NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA Use Tech. Specs. (3)

Notes:

(1) Includes Technical Specification compliance for an RO.

(2) Optional for an SRO-U.

(3) Only applicable to SROs.

Instructions:

Check the applicants' license type and enter one or more event numbers that will allow the examiners to evaluate every applicable competency for every applicant.

ES-301 Competencies Checklist Form ES-301-6 Facility: Seabrook Station Date of Examination: 12/3/2010 Operating Test No.:

APPLICANTS RO-5 RO-6 SRO-U1 SRO-U2 Competencies SCENARIO SCENARIO SCENARIO SCENARIO 3~

1 2 3 4 )1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 ,1. 2 InterpretlDiagnose 4,5, 3,5, 3,6, 2,4, 3,4, 2,3, 3,4, 2,3, 8 6,7 7 5 5,6 4,5 5,6 4,5 Events and Conditions Comply With and 2,4, 1,5, 2,3 1,2, 2,3, 1,2, 2,3, 1,2, Use Procedures (1) 5,6, 7 6,7 45 4,5, 3,4, 3,4, 8 6 5,7 5,7 Operate Control 2,4, 1,3, 1,2, 1,2, NA NA NA NA Boards (2) 5,6, 5,6, 7 4,5 8 7 Communicate 2,4, 13, 2,3, 1,2, 2,3, 1,2, 2,3, 1,2, 5,6, 5,6, 6,7 4,5 4,5, 3,4, 4,5, 3,4, and Interact 8 7 6 5,6, 6 5,6, 7 7 Demonstrate NA NA NA NA 2,3, 2,3, 1,2, 1,2, Supervisory Ability (3) 4,5, 4,5, 3,4, 3,4, 6 6,7 5,6 5,6, 7

Comply With and NA NA NA NA 3,4, 2,3, 3,4, 2,3, Use Tech. Specs. (3) 5 4 5 4 Notes:

(1) Includes Technical Specification compliance for an RO.

(2) Optional for an SRO-U.

(3) Only applicable to SROs.

Instructions:

Check the applicants' license type and enter one or more event numbers that will allow the examiners to evaluate every applicable competency for every applicant.

ES-301 Competencies Checklist Form ES-301-6 Facility: Seabrook Station Date of Examination:1213/2010 Operating Test No.:

APPLICANTS SRO-U3 Competencies SCENARIO SCENARIO SCENARIO SCENARIO

'1 2 3 41~ I 2 3 4 1 2 3 ~ 1 2 3 4 Interpret/Diagnose 3,4, 2,3, 5,6 4,5 Events and Conditions Comply With and 2,3, 1,2, Use Procedures (1) 4,5, 3,4, 6 5,7 Operate Control NA NA Boards (2)

Communicate 2,3, 1.2, 4,5, 3,4, and Interact 6 5,6, 7

Demonstrate 2,3, 1,2, 4,5, 3,4, Supervisory Ability (3) 6 5,6, 7

Comply With and 3,4, 2,3, Use Tech. Specs. (3) 5 4 Notes:

(1 ) Includes Technical Specification compliance for an RO.

(2) Optional for an SRO-U.

(3) Only applicable to SROs.

Instructions:

Check the applicants' license type and enter one or more event numbers that will allow the examiners to evaluate every applicable competency for every applicant.

ES-401 Written Examination Quality Checklist Form ES-401-6 Exam level:

1. licable to the faciU
2. a. NRC KfAs are referenced for aU questions.
b. FaClli leamin ob' . are referenced as available.
3. SRO riate in accordance with Section D2.d of ES-401
4. The sampflng process was random and systematic (If more lhan 4 RO or 2 SRO questions were re eated from the last 2 NRC lIrensin exams, consult the NRR Ol ram office *
5. Question duplfcation from !he license screening/audit exam was controlled as indicated below (check the Item that applies) and .appears appropriate:

X the audit exam was systematically and randomly developed; or

_ the audit exam was completed before the license exam was started; or

)( the examinations were developed independently; or

_ the licensee certifies that there Is no duplication; or

_ other (explain)

6. Bank. use meets limits (no more than 75 percent Bank. Modified from the bank, at least 10 percent new, and the rest new or modified); enter the actual RO I SRQ..onIy uestion distnbution s at ht.
7. Between 50 and 60 percent of the questions on the RO Memory exam are written at the comprehension! analysis level; the SRO exam may exceed 60 percent if the randomly selected KfAs support the higher cognitive levels; enter 11,{) :J f7" j'

the actual RO I SRO uestion distnbution s at ri ht.

8. Referern::eslhandouis provided do not give away answers or aid in the efimination of dlstracmrs.
9. Question content conforms with specific KIA statements in the pre\llously approved
10. Question ndixB.
11. 'The exam contains the required number of one-point. mUltiple choice items; the total is correct and a teeS with the value on the cover sheet.
a. Author
b. Facmly Reviewer (")
c. NRC Chief Examiner (#)
d. NRC Regional SupelVisor Note; .. The facility reviewer's initials/signature are not applicable for NRC-developed examinations.
  1. lode dent NRC reviewer Inltlalltems 10 Column *c"; chief examiner concurrence re ulred.

ES-401. Page 29 of 3;3

ES-403 Written Examination Grading Form ES-403-1 Quality Checklist Date of Exam: I; J. lit:> Exam Level: RO Initials Item Descri tion c 1.

2. Answer key changes and question deletions justified and documented
3. Applicants' scores checked for addition errors reviewers s ot check> 25% of examinations
4. Grading for all borderline cases (80 +/-2% oVE~rall and 70 or 80, ,.;/ A- 1/If- JJ as a licable, +/-4% on the SRO-onl reviewed in detail
5. All other failing examinations checked to ensure that grades are 'ustified
6. Performance on missed questions checked for training deficiencies and wording problems; evaluate validity of uestions missed b half or more of the a l licants Date
a. Grader
b. Facility Reviewer(*)
c. NRC Chief Examiner (*)
d. NRC Supervisor (*)

(*) The facility reviewer's signature is not applicable for examinations graded by the NRC; two inde endent NRC reviews are re uired.

Retrieved from "https://kanterella.com/w/index.php?title=ML103490663&oldid=2553129"