ML102980522
| ML102980522 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Salem, Hope Creek  |
| Issue date: | 04/23/2010 |
| From: | Arthur Burritt NRC Region 1 |
| To: | Balian H, Leonard Cline, Joseph Deboer NRC Region 1 |
| References | |
| FOIA/PA-2010-0334 | |
| Download: ML102980522 (1) | |
Text
Burritt, Arthur From:
Sent:
To:
Cc:
Subject:
Attachments:
Burritt, Arthur C
Friday, April 23, 2010 10:32 AM Balian, Harry; 'Cline, Leonard'; DeBoer, Joseph; Douglas, Christopher; Ennis, Rick; Johnson, Jonathan; Kern, Ludwig; Miller, Ed; Moore, Ross; Patel, Amar; 'Raymond, William';
'Schroeder, Daniel'; Turilin, Andrey; 'Welling, Blake' OHara, Timothy; Conte, Richard; Gray, Harold; Cahill, Christopher Branch 3 Status - 4/23/10 B3-Status 4-23-1 O.doc See attached Key Salem AFW Next Steps:
NRC Next Steps:
Confirm the PSEG risk assessment to delay AFW testing is reasonable - Cahill Confirm the finite element analysis for the unit 1 as found condition is acceptable including the use of appropriate methods and assumptions - Conte/O'Hara/HQ Confirm the technical evaluation that supports 1275 psig is bounding (including a faulted S/G scenario) -
Hansell/Silk Evaluate the Unit 2 AFW extent of condition operability assessment (focus on the differences between Unit 1 & 2) - Schroeder/O'Hara Follow-up on the control air coating concern at the support clamp - O'Hara/Gray Evaluate ongoing AFW piping replacements on Unit 1 - O'Hara Evaluate repairs to the control air system on Unit 1 - O'Hara AFW Information Needs Design records for as installed piping on Unit 1 & 2 (not found as of yet, still looking)
Unit 1 AFW past operability assessment Unit 1 AFW as found condition finite element analysis Unit 2 AFW operability determination 57