ML102980379
| ML102980379 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Salem  |
| Issue date: | 04/22/2010 |
| From: | Conte R NRC Region 1 |
| To: | Balian H, Arthur Burritt, Daniel Schroeder NRC Region 1 |
| References | |
| FOIA/PA-2010-0334 | |
| Download: ML102980379 (2) | |
Text
,.o Ziev, Tracey From:
Conte, Richard Sent:
Thursday, April 22, 2010 12:19 PM To:
Burritt, Arthur; Balian, Harry; Schroeder, Daniel; OHara, Timothy; Schmidt, Wayne; Cahill, Christopher Cc:
Cline, Leonard; Gray, Harold
Subject:
RE: Salem 2 LCO thanks Art, see my previous email on risk their vs ours.
we need to discuss the yard area for Unit 2, different conditions than in FHB and we apparently have discrepant information on status of coating form 1994.
From: Burritt, Arthur Sent: Thursday, April 22, 2010 12:13 PM To: Balian, Harry; Schroeder, Daniel; OHara, Timothy; Schmidt, Wayne; Cahill, Christopher Cc: Cline, Leonard; Conte, Richard; Gray, Harold
Subject:
FW: Salem 2 LCO FYI From: Clifford, James
-]
Sent: Thursday, April 22, 2010 12:08 PM To: Lew, David; Burritt, Arthur; Cline, Leonard; Roberts, Darrell; Wilson, Peter
Subject:
Salem 2 LCO Based on a conversation with Carl Fricker, Salem VP as of 11:30 am:
The licensee completed a risk assessment to extend the missed surveillance LCO out to 7 days. While we still need to complete our confirmatory review of the risk assessment, the licensee has concluded that extending the LCO for a portion of the surveillance interval is acceptable, which obviates the need for an immediate shutdown.
In addition, the licensee has excavated the upper portion of the AFW piping the fuel handling building. Their visual inspection identified that the pipe coating is intact, and is visuallyin much better' (the licensee's words) condition than that found on Unit 1. The licensee will be performing UT inspections of this portion of the Unit 2 AFW piping (limited scope).
This provides additional assurance that similar problems (to those found on Unit 1) with this piping do not extend to Unit 2. The licensee will be putting together an operability determination for the Unit 2 AFW piping based on this latest information.
Tim O'Hara is closely following the licensee's activities, and has completed his own visual inspection of the Unit 2 piping. Our SRAs will review the licensee's risk assessment. The residents, with DRS support, will review the licensee's operability determination. We would also need to review any UT results.
Jim 1/7_
)
2