ML102980361

Email from Burritt, Arthur to Conte, Richard, FW: OP Eval 10-005 Salem U2 Buried AFW Pipe.Doc

ML102980361
Person / Time
Site:	Salem
Issue date:	05/18/2010
From:	Arthur Burritt Reactor Projects Branch 3
To:	Conte R Engineering Region 1 Branch 1
References
FOIA/PA-2010-0334
Download: ML102980361 (2)

Text

Burritt, Arthur From: Burritt, Arthur k01.. /

Sent: Tuesday, May 18, 20f' 4:12 PM To: Conte, Richard

Subject:

FW: OP EVAL 10-005 Salem U2 Buried AFW Pipe.doc Attachments: OP EVAL 10-005 Salem U2 Buried AFW Pipe.doc FYI From: Schroeder, Daniel Sent: Tuesday, May 18, 2010 4:07 PM To: OHara, Timothy Cc: Burritt, Arthur

Subject:

FW: OP EVAL 10-005 Salem U2 Buried AFW Pipe.doc Hot off the press!

From: Schroeder, Daniel L. [mailto: Daniel.Schroeder@pseg.com]

Sent: Tuesday, May 18, 2010 4:04 PM To: Schroeder, Daniel

Subject:

FW: OP EVAL 10-005 Salem U2 Buried AFW Pipe.doc From: Down, Robert E.

Sent: Tuesday, May 18, 2010 3:45 PM To: Schroeder, Daniel L.

Subject:

OP EVAL 10-005 Salem U2 Buried AFW Pipe.doc Dan, see attached for OP EVAL for Unit 2 AFW buried piping. Text has been uploaded to SAP and is awaiting SRO and shift manager approval.

Bob Down, x1868 26

(ýý 6Z

N.

Burritt, Arthur From: Burritt, Arthur Sent: Tuesday, May 18, 2010 2:01 PM To: Conte, Richard

Subject:

FW: Salem ISI Open Items I think we should elevate the need to receive the Unit 2 AFW operability determination to the VP, what do you think?

From: OHara, Timothy Sent: Monday, May 17, 2010 7:02 PM To: Burritt, Arthur; Schroeder, Daniel Cc: Conte, Richard

Subject:

RE: Salem IS1 Open Items

Art, I discussed the outstanding items with Howard Berrick last Friday.

I have not received the Unit 2 AFW operability determination addressing structural integrity. Howard said they were working on it and he would email it to me when it was approved. If I receive it, I will forward a copy to everyone on this email.

About mid-week (last week) I received several documents addressing my outstanding questions about the new coating cure time, the original coating and the basis of the 1950 psi design pressure. After reviewing what he sent, I called and gave him some additional questions about the coating cure process and the new coating life.

No records have been located which can confirm that Ul or U2 were actually coated. Nothing new was received on the design pressure issue.

Howard said they were working on both the Eq. ACE for the corrosion (due 6/2) and on the cause for the missed pressure tests (due 6/28), and that he would forward by email further information as he received it from Engineering.

Tim OHara From: Burritt, Arthur Sent: Monday, May 17, 2010 4:55 PM To: Schroeder, Daniel; OHara, Timothy Cc: Conte, Richard

Subject:

Have we received the Unit 2 AFW operability determination (with a structural integrity evaluation) yet?

27