ML102800605

Lr Hearing - Requested Data?

ML102800605
Person / Time
Site:	Indian Point
Issue date:	10/07/2010
From:	Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
To:	Division of License Renewal
References
Download: ML102800605 (3)

Text

IPRenewal NPEmails From: Stuyvenberg, Andrew Sent: Thursday, October 07, 2010 4:40 PM To: Diane.Rusanowsky@Noaa.gov Cc: Logan, Dennis; IPRenewal NPEmails; Imboden, Andy

Subject:

RE: Requested Data?

Diane -

Ill call momentarily to speak with you. Also, Dr. Dennis Logan (my colleague who was on the call with us; hes actually based in DC) will be back here tomorrow, so if theres anything we need to address with him, well be able to do so.

Thanks!

Drew From: Diane Rusanowsky [1]

Sent: Wednesday, October 06, 2010 5:09 PM To: Stuyvenberg, Andrew

Subject:

Re: Requested Data?

Drew:

I thought that there was going to be a short summary of the 12/09 data with a statement of how/why NRC sees that the changes were not material to their ultimate decision with respect to EFH [generated by your colleague from the west coast that participated in the call]. I know we talked about a couple of options, perhaps my notes were not correct. I'll take another view of the items that you mention below and will let you know if I still need something for our records.

Thanks.

Diane Stuyvenberg, Andrew wrote:

Diane -

I sent an e-mail on Friday evening with the updated table we'd discussed, as well as the ADAMS accession number for the 11/2009 data submission from Entergy. I've attached a copy of that e-mail to this e-mail. As I mentioned in my previous message, if you have any difficulty downloading the 11/2009 data submission from ADAMS, I would be happy to break the PDF into pieces and forward it to you via e-mail (it's too large to send all at once).

My apologies if I've missed anything, and please call (301-415-4006) or e-mail if there's anything else you need.

Best, Drew

---

Original Message-----

From: Diane Rusanowsky [2]

Sent: Wednesday, October 06, 2010 11:14 AM To: Stuyvenberg, Andrew 1

Subject:

Requested Data?

Importance: High Just a quick note to follow up on the requested data for Indian Point

[provided to NRC by applicant in 12/2009, or as summarized by NRC since]

as we discussed on Friday. Will it be coming by e-mail, courier, or snail mail? I'll need it for our files and to finalize our draft letter in reply to the NRC's most recent correspondence to us on this topic.

Thanks very much.

Diane

Subject:

Followup to today's call From:

"Stuyvenberg, Andrew" <Andrew.Stuyvenberg@nrc.gov>

Date:

Fri, 01 Oct 2010 16:51:13 0400 To:

"Diane.Rusanowsky@Noaa.gov" <Diane.Rusanowsky@noaa.gov>

To:

"Diane.Rusanowsky@Noaa.gov" <Diane.Rusanowsky@noaa.gov>

CC:

IPRenewal NPEmails <IPRenewal.NPEmails@nrc.gov>

Diane -

As requested, Ive attached an updated version of Table 6. The data submission from Entergy is too large for me to attach (33 MB), but it is available through ADAMS at ML093420528. Please let me know if you have any difficulty finding or opening it, and then I can try breaking it into manageable pieces to send to you.

I look forward to hearing from you.

Best, Drew Drew Stuyvenberg U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission 3014154006 Andrew.Stuyvenberg@nrc.gov 2

Hearing Identifier: IndianPointUnits2and3NonPublic_EX Email Number: 2060 Mail Envelope Properties (AF843158D8D87443918BD3AA953ABF7819C769E21F)

Subject:

RE: Requested Data?

Sent Date: 10/7/2010 4:40:03 PM Received Date: 10/7/2010 4:40:04 PM From: Stuyvenberg, Andrew Created By: Andrew.Stuyvenberg@nrc.gov Recipients:

"Logan, Dennis" <Dennis.Logan@nrc.gov>

Tracking Status: None "IPRenewal NPEmails" <IPRenewal.NPEmails@nrc.gov>

Tracking Status: None "Imboden, Andy" <Andy.Imboden@nrc.gov>

Tracking Status: None "Diane.Rusanowsky@Noaa.gov" <Diane.Rusanowsky@Noaa.gov>

Tracking Status: None Post Office: HQCLSTR02.nrc.gov Files Size Date & Time MESSAGE 3449 10/7/2010 4:40:04 PM Options Priority: Standard Return Notification: No Reply Requested: No Sensitivity: Normal Expiration Date:

Recipients Received: