|
---|
Category:- No Document Type Applies
MONTHYEARML22067A1862022-03-10010 March 2022 Enc 1 - Regulatory Conference Participant List ML22034A3952022-02-16016 February 2022 Enclosure 3 - IP 96001 CY2021 - IR 8 Baseline Inspection Completion ML22034A3972022-02-16016 February 2022 Enclosure 2 - IP 92707 CY2021 - IR 8 Baseline Inspection Completion ML22034A3992022-02-16016 February 2022 Enclosure 1 - IP 71130.03 Cy 2021 - IR 8 Baseline Inspection Completion ML21027A3472021-01-27027 January 2021 2021401 Information Release ML20118C1902020-05-13013 May 2020 Public Notice of Application for Renewed Facility Operating License an Exigent License Amendment Request for a One-Time Change to Completion Times for Inoperable Electrical Distribution Systems ML19228A1652019-08-26026 August 2019 Public Notice - NRC Staff Proposes to Amend Operating License at the Columbia Generating Station ML19009A3272019-01-0808 January 2019 NRC-2017-000688 - Resp 4 - Interim, Agency Records Subject to the Request Are Enclosed (Columbia Generating Station, FHRR - Released Set) ML18144A9772018-05-25025 May 2018 FAQ 18-03 Columbia Scram Exemption Request Final Approved ML16210A5292016-07-28028 July 2016 Emergency Action Level (EAL) Classification Matrix (Wallcharts) - Enclosure 1, Attachment 3 ML16054A0132016-02-12012 February 2016 FOIA/PA-2015-0294 - Resp 2 - Final, Agency Records Subject to the Request Are Enclosed. Part 5 of 8 ML16054A0072016-02-12012 February 2016 FOIA/PA-2015-0294 - Resp 2 - Final, Final Response #2, Records Already Publicly Available ML16054A0122016-02-12012 February 2016 FOIA/PA-2015-0294 - Resp 2 - Final, Agency Records Subject to the Request Are Enclosed. Part 4 of 8 ML16054A0102016-02-12012 February 2016 FOIA/PA-2015-0294 - Resp 2 - Final, Agency Records Subject to the Request Are Enclosed. Part 2 of 8 ML16054A0092016-02-12012 February 2016 FOIA/PA-2015-0294 - Resp 2 - Final, Agency Records Subject to the Request Are Enclosed. Part 8 of 8 ML16054A0152016-02-12012 February 2016 FOIA/PA-2015-0294 - Resp 2 - Final, Agency Records Subject to the Request Are Enclosed. Part 7 of 8 ML16054A0082016-02-12012 February 2016 FOIA/PA-2015-0294 - Resp 2 - Final, Agency Records Subject to the Request Are Enclosed. Part 1 of 8 ML16054A0142016-02-12012 February 2016 FOIA/PA-2015-0294 - Resp 2 - Final, Agency Records Subject to the Request Are Enclosed. Part 6 of 8 ML16054A0112016-02-12012 February 2016 FOIA/PA-2015-0294 - Resp 2 - Final, Agency Records Subject to the Request Are Enclosed. Part 3 of 8 ML15141A2762015-05-28028 May 2015 Public Notice of Application for Amendment, Extension of Implementation Period for Amendment 232 Revision of Technical Specification Table 3.3.1.1-1, Function 7, Scram Discharge Volume Water Level - High ML14071A1502014-02-0303 February 2014 3: Public Notice of Application - Public Notice and Public Hearing Proposed National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System Permit Reissuance for the Energy Northwest Columbia Station ML14071A1552014-01-15015 January 2014 4: Columbia Generating Station - National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System Waste Discharge Permit No. WA002515-1, 1/15/2014 ML13253A2292013-08-15015 August 2013 Potential Rais: Meteorology and Air Compliance ML13143A3312013-06-0606 June 2013 Operating Boiling-Water Reactor Licensees with Mark 1 and Mark 2 Containments Addresses List - Enclosure 2 ML13246A3272012-04-10010 April 2012 Energy Northwest Documents Regarding an Engineering Change and 10 C.F.R. 50.59 Evaluation ML12056A0522012-03-12012 March 2012 Enclosure 6 - List of Power Reactor Licensees and Holders of Construction Permits in Active or Deferred Status ML1018706442010-07-0606 July 2010 Supplemental Info Needed for Acceptance Review LAR to Change Technical Specifications to Support Power Range Neutron Monitoring/Arts/Mellla Implementation. ML1019304602010-03-25025 March 2010 List of Historical Leaks and Spills at Us Commercial Nuclear Power Plants ML0823900082008-09-0404 September 2008 Enclosure 4 - FAQ Log July 2008 ML0732400242007-10-25025 October 2007 Examples of Max Thermal Power License Conditions ML0535003272005-12-0808 December 2005 AST Talking Points ML1028005512005-08-15015 August 2005 ARB Summary - RIV-2005-A-0089 ML0431503152005-03-18018 March 2005 Sept 2004 - Initial Exam - Final Scenarios ML0426100722004-09-13013 September 2004 Plant Engineering Branch Closed Items Interim Safety Basis ML0505404692004-02-10010 February 2004 Dynamic Web Page Printout Dated 02/10/2004, ROP PIM Report - All Sites - Event Dates: 01/01/2003 - 02/10/2004 ML0505404642004-02-0909 February 2004 Dynamic Web Page Printout Dated 02/09/2004 Regarding Applied Violations for Nuclear Power Plants ML0420402482004-01-15015 January 2004 Follow-Up Assignment Sheet (Detail) Columbia Re 05/21/2003 Event Involving Temporary Loss of Residual Heat Removal Pump Used for Shutdown Cooling ML18191A3451975-03-0606 March 1975 Washington Public Power Supply System Nuclear Project No. 2, $125,000,000 Revenue Bonds, Series 1975 a 2022-03-10
[Table view] |
Text
.1, ARB
SUMMARY
- Responsible PSBI RIV-2005-A-0089.
ýBrain ch, RPBA Facility Name Columbia ARB Date: August 15, 2005 Docket Number 050/397 01 Case No.: N/A ARB DECISION Purpose of ARB initial Previous N/A Decisions Today's Decision ARB agreed to close, not enough information to proceed.
Basis for Another ARB REIFERRAil-Refer to: Criteria Reviewed?
Referral Rationale 01 TIN VESTIIGATION -~** ,
Pri'iori ty-R-ti o naIe DOL Deferral Rationale ARB PARTICIPANTS (* denotes ARB Chairman Approval)
CJohnson TPruett KFuller MVasquez LGersey HFreeman AHowell* KKennedy DWhite MShannon
ALLEGATION RECEIPT FORM .Page.1 Received By: Zachary Dunham Receipt Date: I 8/5/05 Receipt Method (meeting, phone call, letter, Anonymous Letter etc.)
FACILITY Facility Name Columbia Generating Station.
- Location Richland, WA Docket(s),' 50-397 CONCERN Summary the of Concems.(be brief) 1*.The anonymous letter describes general concerns regarding chilled environment:ý, ", "
discrimination, and. safety within the security department at Columbia. This letter was received via the inter-office mail system at Columbia. The letter contains no identifying::
information, is unsigned, and was received in an inter-office mailer with no identifying:.
information as to who the sender is.
Obtain concern specifics. What is the concern,when did it occur, who was involved, etc. If the concern involves discrmination, fill in the last section of.
the form.
What is the potential safety impact? Isthis an ongoing concern?
'Reduced security effectiveness? The letter infers that the issue is ongoing.
What requirement/regulation governs this concern?
Potentially 10CFR73, Security order, 1.0CFR50.7 What records should the NRC review?
- Unknow n -.": .. " ...- .. ' .... I .
What other individuals could the NRC contact for information?
- Unknown. .
How did the individual find out about the concem?
Unknown.,
Was the concern brought to management's attention? If so; what actions have been taken, if not, why not? " . :
Unknown.
WhyI was the concern brought I to the NRC's attention' Unknown. However, given the historical and ongoing tension between the security force and Energy Northwest over labor negotiations the individual probably believes: that.security management would not properly address the concerns..
ALLEGATION RECEIPT FORM Page 2 ALLEGER INFORMATION Full Name Unknown. Employer Unknown.
Mailing Address (Home) Unknown. Occupation Unknown.
Telephone (Daytime) Unknown. Relationship to facility Unknown.
(Home)
(Other)
Preference for method and time of Was the individual advised of contact identity protection Referral Explain that if the concerns are referred to the licensee, that alleger's identity will not be revealed and that the NRC will review and evaluate the thoroughness and adequacy of the licensee's response. If the concerns are an agreement state issue or the jurisdiction of another agency, explain that we will refer the concern to the appropriate agency, and if the alleger agrees, we will provide the alleger's identity for followup.
Does the individual object to the Does the individual object to referral? Ireleasing their identity?
Regulations prohibit NRC licensees (including contractors and subcontractors) from discriminating against individuals who engage in protected activities (alleging violations of regulatory requirements, refusing to engage in practices made unlawful by statues, etc.). -
Does the concern involve Was the individual advised of the discrimination? ."I DOL process?
What was the protected activity?
-What-adverse-actions-have-been-taken?:When?------ -- -
Why does the individual believe the actions were taken as a result of engaging in a protected activity?
Revised 9/3/03