ML102780646

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search

E-mail Entergy Operation, Inc.S Intent to File for a Predecisional Enforcement Conference Related to Decommissioning Funds Report
ML102780646
Person / Time
Site: River Bend Entergy icon.png
Issue date: 10/01/2010
From: Christopher Regan
Division of Policy and Rulemaking
To: Wang A, Ashley M, Blount T, Fredrichs T, Mcginty T, Quay T, Christopher Regan, Simmons A, Uttal S
Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
Wang, A B, NRR/DORL/LPLIV, 415-1445
References
TAC ME4802
Download: ML102780646 (2)


Text

From:

Regan, Christopher Sent:

Friday, October 01, 2010 3:43 PM To:

Regan, Christopher; Simmons, Anneliese; Ashley, MaryAnn; McGinty, Tim; Blount, Tom; Quay, Theodore; Fredrichs, Thomas; Wang, Alan; Uttal, Susan Cc:

Dusaniwskyj, Michael; Scott, Catherine; Pederson, Cynthia

Subject:

RE: FYI: RBS Choice letter response This is just a quick note to communicate that I talked to Brian Ford at RBS and they are officially requesting a PEC. I also understand that they also contacted Tom and Anneliese in the office (I am at home today) to state the same. They will also be sending in a letter next week requesting the PEC in writing. Anneliese will be working with them and necessary NRC staff and management support to pinpoint the date for the PEC with due sensitivity to the IRRS mission to occur shortly.

Thanks, Chris From: Regan, Christopher Sent: Thursday, September 30, 2010 4:29 PM To: Simmons, Anneliese; Ashley, MaryAnn; McGinty, Tim; Blount, Tom; Quay, Theodore; Fredrichs, Thomas; Wang, Alan; Uttal, Susan Cc: Dusaniwskyj, Michael; Scott, Catherine

Subject:

FYI: RBS Choice letter response In the interest of clarification and simplification I spoke directly to Brian Ford (Senior Manager of Licensing for Entergy) regarding the intent of their requested call tomorrow on the River Bend enforcement action.

After further inquiry he indicated that the purpose of the call was merely to inform the NRC of which path they would choose to respond to the NRC letter. This was not clear after their initial contact with us. Additionally, he stated it had to be tomorrow because he did not have all the necessary concurrences to confirm which response path they would take today and they could not wait until Monday as the 10 day required response date would be this Sunday.

Nonetheless he indicated they were unofficially leaning towards requesting a PEC. I will talk to him again tomorrow to confirm this as their official response and inform you all of this outcome.

We can then begin with the next steps on our end.

Consequently there will be no need for a conference call tomorrow (Friday).

Thanks, Chris
Regards, Christopher M. Regan, Chief Financial Analysis Branch Division of Policy and Rulemaking

Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission ph. 301-415-2768 fax 301-415-2222 email: christopher.regan@nrc.gov E-mail Properties Mail Envelope Properties (2B99C8FC0E9CB14D9BAD822B6E7B17E006326DA5A1)

Subject:

RE: FYI: RBS Choice letter response Sent Date: 10/1/2010 3:43:14 PM Received Date: 10/1/2010 3:43:14 PM From: Regan, Christopher Created By: Christopher.Regan@nrc.gov Recipients:

Christopher.Regan@nrc.gov (Regan, Christopher)

Tracking Status: None Anneliese.Simmons@nrc.gov (Simmons, Anneliese)

Tracking Status: None MaryAnn.Ashley@nrc.gov (Ashley, MaryAnn)

Tracking Status: None Tim.McGinty@nrc.gov (McGinty, Tim)

Tracking Status: None Tom.Blount@nrc.gov (Blount, Tom)

Tracking Status: None Theodore.Quay@nrc.gov (Quay, Theodore)

Tracking Status: None Thomas.Fredrichs@nrc.gov (Fredrichs, Thomas)

Tracking Status: None Alan.Wang@nrc.gov (Wang, Alan)

Tracking Status: None Susan.Uttal@nrc.gov (Uttal, Susan)

Tracking Status: None Michael.Dusaniwskyj@nrc.gov (Dusaniwskyj, Michael)

Tracking Status: None Catherine.Scott@nrc.gov (Scott, Catherine)

Tracking Status: None Cynthia.Pederson@nrc.gov (Pederson, Cynthia)

Tracking Status: None Post Office:

HQCLSTR02.nrc.gov

Files Size Date & Time MESSAGE 10522 10/1/2010 Options Expiration Date:

Priority: olImportanceNormal ReplyRequested: False Return Notification: False Sensitivity: olNormal Recipients received: