ML102640060
| ML102640060 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Issue date: | 01/12/2011 |
| From: | Mcginty T Division of Policy and Rulemaking |
| To: | |
| Szabo, A L, NRR/DPR, 415-1985 | |
| References | |
| Download: ML102640060 (4) | |
Text
UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION OFFICE OF NUCLEAR REACTOR REGULATION WASHINGTON, DC 20555-0001 DRAFT NRC REGULATORY ISSUE
SUMMARY
2010-XXX 10 CFR 50.75 REPORTING FOR DECOMMISSIONING FUNDING STATUS REPORTS ADDRESSEES All holders of and applicants for a power reactor operating license or construction permit under Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations (10 CFR) Part 50, Domestic Licensing of Production and Utilization Facilities, except those that have permanently ceased operations and have certified that fuel has been permanently removed from the reactor vessel.
All holders of and applicants for a power reactor early site permit, combined license, standard design certification, standard design approval, or manufacturing license under 10 CFR Part 52, Licenses, Certifications, and Approvals for Nuclear Power Plants.
INTENT The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) is issuing this regulatory issue summary (RIS) to clarify the reporting requirements of 10 CFR 50.75(f)(1) and 10 CFR 50.75(f)(2) regarding the status of decommissioning funding assurance.
In 2009, the NRC received the decommissioning funding status (DFS) reports for all the NRC licensed power reactors, including those undergoing decommissioning, as required by 10 CFR 50.75(f)(1) and (2). During the evaluation process for the DFS reports, the NRC staff determined that communication between the NRC and licensees could be enhanced.
Therefore, the staff decided to provide this RIS to clarify the information that licensees should report to the NRC in the DFS reports to ensure standardization and consistency. This RIS does not replace any information provided in RIS 2001-07, Revision 1, 10 CFR 50.75 Reporting and Recordkeeping for Decommissioning Planning, dated January 8, 2009, and should be considered a supplement to it.
BACKGROUND SECY-07-0197, Reactor Decommissioning Trust Fund Oversight by Other Agencies and Recommendations Regarding Further Commission Action, issued November 2007, recommended to the Commission that the NRC staff begin to perform periodic spot-checks at the licensees offices of the original statements and other related documents sent to a licensee from its trustee that disclose the trust fund balance to ensure that the amounts reported to the NRC in the DFS reports are equivalent to the amount stated in the licensees year-end bank statement.
DRAFT RIS 2010-XXX Page 2 of 5 The NRC has completed over half of the required spot-checks, ensuring in each case that the DFS report matched the licensees submission and that the information provided to the NRC was correct.
In 2009, during the NRC staffs review of the DFS reports, the staff held conference calls and issued requests for additional information to ensure compliance with reporting regulations under 10 CFR 50.75(f). Also during the review, the NRC staff determined that stakeholders needed to be informed about the NRCs evaluation process for decommissioning funding assurance (DFA), as well as about the information that licensees should provide to the NRC when they submit their DFS reports. The current guidance that the NRC staff uses to evaluate the DFS reports appears in Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation (NRR) Instruction LIC-205, Revision 3 (Agencywide Documents Access and Management System (ADAMS) Accession No. ML100550465).
Because of these issues, the NRC staff is clarifying for licensees and external stakeholders the information that they should use and present to the NRC in the DFS reports to ensure that the NRC staff, licensees, and stakeholders are using the same, correct figures and to prevent potential issues resulting from shortfalls in the licensees decommissioning fund.
SUMMARY
OF THE ISSUE On the basis of a review of recent DFS reports submitted to the NRC, the staff has identified two general categories in which DFS report submittals could be improved:
(1) format and content of submittal (2) site-specific proposals Format and Content of Submittal Under 10 CFR 50.75(c)(2), the licensee must provide the most recent applicable regional data from the U.S. Department of Labor Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS) when submitting the DFS report. The licensee should provide the month of December of the calendar year preceding the date of the report BLS regional data, if available, for labor, and fourth quarter of the calendar year preceding the date of the report BLS regional data, if available, for energy; if either or both of those numbers are not available, then the licensee should use the latest available numbers and specify which month or quarter.
Under 10 CFR 50.75(f), the licensee must submit the amount of decommissioning funds accumulated at the end of the calendar year. In some cases, licensees who recover their costs in rates are authorized to accumulate funds outside the decommissioning account until a determination is made by their rate regulator regarding whether the funds will be deposited into the account. Funds held outside the decommissioning trust using a method not listed in 10 CFR 50.75(e) should not be included in the amount of funds reported as accumulated. In some cases, the licensee has accumulated funds in its decommissioning trust greater than needed to satisfy the minimum amount required by NRC regulations or has commingled funds set aside to satisfy the NRC requirement with other decommissioning-related funds; if so, the licensee must report the total accumulated amount in its decommissioning trust for radiological decommissioning, pursuant to NRC regulations, and may, separately report the amount
DRAFT RIS 2010-XXX Page 3 of 5 accumulated for State costs, spent fuel management costs, or other purposes. The licensee needs to preserve the distinction between NRC-determined cost estimate and all other decommissioning cost estimates in their reports.
The licensee should report the actual amount accumulated for decommissioning, as defined by the NRCs regulations. When performing spot-checks of decommissioning fund accounts, the NRC staff discovered that some licensees provided the book value of their Decommissioning Trust Fund (DTF) balance instead of the market value. Although the book value has usually been a lower amount than the market value, the market value is a more accurate measure of the worth of the DTF, because it is the value of the DTF if liquidated on the date reported.
Licensees should avoid providing the book value and consider providing the market value for their DTF balance. The DFS reports will allow the NRC staff to track the amounts in all licensees DTFs to determine financial market trends and ensure that licensees are following all NRC regulations.
When submitting the DFS report, if the licensee provides a schedule of the annual amounts remaining to be collected, the licensee should avoid providing an aggregated amount and instead provide the amounts in a year-by-year breakdown that gives the source of the annual amounts remaining to be collected (i.e., rate-recovery or non-bypassable charges, as allowed under 10 CFR 50.75(e)(ii)(A) or (B)). If a licensee is relying on any contracts under 10 CFR 50.75(e)(i)(v) as the source of the annual amounts remaining to be collected, the licensee should identify the contracts and provide the amounts to be collected on an annual basis. The licensee may also provide the NRC with the regulatory order stating the amounts and length of the schedule.
If the licensee claims a greater than 2 percent real rate of return, in accordance with 10 CFR 50.75(e)(1)(i), the licensee should provide the rate-setting authority order permitting a greater real rate of return or other documentation granting the higher rate, including inflation and other escalation factors. The licensee should also indicate whether the higher real rate of return has been allowed during the decommissioning period.
Under 10 CFR 50.75(f), the DFS report must state the modifications to the method of providing DFA. This includes, but is not limited to, adding or eliminating funding methods, changing existing methods (for example, changing the terms of contractual obligations or the face amount of a surety, insurance, or other guarantee method), and changing the commingling of funds (creating subaccounts, moving funds from one unit to another within the same site). Any material changes to the trust agreement must also be reported in the DFS report (Note: under 10 CFR 50.75(h)(1)(iii), material changes to the trust agreement require prior written notification to the NRC).
Site-Specific Proposals Licensees are required to provide a site-specific cost estimate five years prior to cessation of operations. However, if a licensee chooses to submit a site-specific cost estimate prior to that time, it must be equal to or greater than the NRC minimum, as calculated in 10 CFR 50.75(c),
and be accompanied by the same information required for the site-specific study required under 10 CFR 50.75(f)(3). It should be consistent with the cost assessments made in the most recently submitted site-specific cost estimate to the NRC, Federal Energy Regulatory
DRAFT RIS 2010-XXX Page 4 of 5 Commission, state public utilities commission, or other regulatory body. The licensee should provide a reference and citation to any site-specific cost estimate submitted to another regulatory body. If the licensee does not provide this information, the NRC staff may determine the site-specific method to be insufficient as submitted and only allow the licensee to use the regulatory formula, with no credit for SAFSTOR, unless more information is provided.
The detailed site-specific study should have a year-by-year cost breakdown combined with the overnight cost (cost without inflation or cost escalation) of decommissioning the plant using constant dollars for the year reported. The NRC staff evaluates the site-specific method using the following steps: (1) applying the current revision of NRR OI LIC-205 to calculate the growth of the fund during operations, (2) for each year during decommissioning, (a) subtracting the annual cost to be incurred and then (b) providing a 2 percent real rate of return, unless a higher rate has been allowed, and (3) repeating step (2) for each year of the decommissioning period until either the decommissioning period is completed or the DTF is depleted.
BACKFIT DISCUSSION This RIS provides regulatory clarification and does not represent a new or different staff position regarding the implementation of 10 CFR 50.75, Reporting and Recordkeeping for Decommissioning Planning. It requires no action or written response beyond that required in 10 CFR 50.75. Any action by addressees to implement changes to their reporting procedures in accordance with the clarifications in this RIS is strictly voluntary, ensures compliance with current regulations, and therefore is not a backfit under 10 CFR 50.109, Backfitting.
Consequently, the NRC staff did not perform a backfit analysis.
FEDERAL REGISTER NOTIFICATION Although this RIS is informational and does not represent a departure from current regulatory requirements, a notice of opportunity for public comment on this RIS was published in the Federal Register (FR), _____, 2010 (____ FR ____).
PAPERWORK REDUCTION ACT STATEMENT This RIS contains and references information collection requirements that are subject to the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.). Existing requirements were approved by the Office of Management and Budget, approval number 3150-0011.
Public Protection Notification The NRC may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a request for information or an information collection requirement unless the requesting document displays a currently valid OMB control number.
If you have any questions about this regulatory issue summary, please contact the person listed below or the Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation (NRR) project manager for your specific nuclear power plant.
DRAFT RIS 2010-XXX Page 5 of 5 CONTACT Please direct any questions about this matter to the technical contact listed below or the appropriate NRR project manager.
/RA/ by TQuay for Timothy J. McGinty, Director Division of Policy and Rulemaking Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation Technical
Contact:
Aaron L. Szabo, NRR/DPR 301-415-1985 E-mail: aaron.szabo@nrc.gov
ML102640060 *Via E-mail OFFICE DPR/PFAB Tech Ed* OGC (CRA)
NAME ASzabo KAzariah-Kribbs SCroston DATE 10/04/2010 10/04/2010 10/18/2010 OFFICE PMDA* OIS* OE NAME LHill TDonnell NHilton DATE 10/28 /2010 11/ 2 /2010 10/ 27 /2010 OFFICE NRR/DORL: D FSME/DWMEP* OGC (NLO) DPR: D NAME JGiitter LCamper SUttal TMcGinty (TQuay for)
DATE 11/3 /2010 11/4/2010 10/13/2010 01/12/2011