ML102460304
| ML102460304 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Diablo Canyon  |
| Issue date: | 04/13/2010 |
| From: | Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation |
| To: | |
| References | |
| Download: ML102460304 (3) | |
Text
1 DiabloCanyonNPEm Resource From:
Stuyvenberg, Andrew Sent:
Tuesday, April 13, 2010 3:17 PM To:
'David Weisman' Cc:
'beckers@thegrid.net'
Subject:
RE: Follow up NRC Diablo License Renewal Process meeting Feb 9th and FINANCE QUESTIONS Mr. Weisman -
I've followed several different paths in pursuit of the financial information you seek. In each case, however, the answer I ultimately received is that you will need to file a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) request in order to obtain the information. You may already be familiar with the NRC's FOIA process, but if not, please visit http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/foia/foia-request.html. This webpage provides instructions on how to file a FOIA request, as well as the types of information you should include in the FOIA request. The process also includes provisions for expedited processing.
Based on my discussions with various levels of NRC staff, I will also point out that your initial request should include an indication of willingness to pay applicable fees (more information is available on the webpage listed in the previous paragraph). I mention it here because I understand that some requesters have seen FOIA requests delayed because they didn't address fee payment in their requests. There is also a fee waiver process - again, addressed on the FOIA webpage - that may apply to your request.
Please let me know if you have any questions about the FOIA process.
Best regards, Drew Drew Stuyvenberg U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission 301-415-4006 Andrew.Stuyvenberg@nrc.gov
Original Message-----
From: David Weisman [1]
Sent: Thursday, April 08, 2010 2:13 PM To: Stuyvenberg, Andrew Cc: beckers@thegrid.net
Subject:
Re: Follow up NRC Diablo License Renewal Process meeting Feb 9th and FINANCE QUESTIONS Hello Drew,
...and while we are on the subject of questions asked (and not answered) I was wondering about this one...our request that we be shown where and how to access the current financial cost of the ongoing relicensing procedure, as recorded by the NRC in the "account" set up particularly for Diablo Canyon.
This would include all the costs the NRC "bills" towards the Diablo relicensing process, from labor and overhead to travel and yes, even the plethora of police and security at our local meeting.
2 I must emphasize that this is a question that cannot await an answer in the broader context, as you indicated to Rochelle, to be published eventually as part of the "environmental scoping comments." We are now entering, at the state level, the CPUC proceedings for the financing of this license renewal and we certainly need to compare whether your numbers and the numbers PG&E is putting forth will match. Our pre-hearing conference for this CPUC process begins on April 14. Our initial request for this information goes back to the meeting held in SLO in February, thus our desire to see these answers expedited now in a timely fashion.
Thanks for your attention to this matter.
Most sincerely, DAVID WEISMAN Outreach Coordinator Alliance for Nuclear Responsibility www.a4nr.org On 4/5/10 12:55 PM, "Rochelle" <beckers@thegrid.net> wrote:
> Hello Drew,
> I received your follow up email advising the Alliance that the you
> will be submitting the items I sent as "environmental scoping
> comments, and the staff will respond to them in writing as part of the
> staff's summary of environmental scoping. That summary will be
> published after the close of the environmental scoping period and
> prior to the publication of the draft supplemental environmental impact statement."
> I have also received the NRC's Summary of the Feb 9th meeting and am
> disappointed that the staff did not choose to include written comments
> of those who sumbitted them to the NRC that evening/or as follow up.
> As you are aware there have been several other earthquakes in coastal
> and California areas after the Feb 9th meeting in. How long does the
> NRC intend to ignore the warnings of Mother Nature or the continued
> concerns of the community, elected representatives and NGO's of the
> impacts of new seismic data (and state-required seismic studies) and expect us to trust you?
> We repeat our request to stay PG&E's license renewal application and
> form a joint review committee to oversee the seismic peer review as soon as possible.
> In Peace
> Rochelle David Weisman 540 Piney Way # C Morro Bay, CA 93442 (805) 772-7077 davidweisman@charter.net
Hearing Identifier:
DiabloCanyon_LicenseRenewal_NonPublic Email Number:
927 Mail Envelope Properties (A39E93AC528D144995E76C6AB82D5D970354C3828C)
Subject:
RE: Follow up NRC Diablo License Renewal Process meeting Feb 9th and FINANCE QUESTIONS Sent Date:
4/13/2010 3:17:06 PM Received Date:
4/13/2010 3:17:00 PM From:
Stuyvenberg, Andrew Created By:
Andrew.Stuyvenberg@nrc.gov Recipients:
"'beckers@thegrid.net'" <beckers@thegrid.net>
Tracking Status: None
"'David Weisman'" <davidweisman@charter.net>
Tracking Status: None Post Office:
HQCLSTR02.nrc.gov Files Size Date & Time MESSAGE 4403 4/13/2010 3:17:00 PM Options Priority:
Standard Return Notification:
No Reply Requested:
No Sensitivity:
Normal Expiration Date:
Recipients Received: