ML102460303
| ML102460303 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Diablo Canyon  |
| Issue date: | 04/12/2010 |
| From: | Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation |
| To: | Division of License Renewal |
| References | |
| Download: ML102460303 (3) | |
Text
1 DiabloCanyonNPEm Resource From:
Stuyvenberg, Andrew Sent:
Monday, April 12, 2010 12:15 PM To:
'Rachel MacDonald'; Maier, Bill Cc:
'Barbara Byron'
Subject:
RE: Diablo Canyon Comments Thanks for the heads-up, Rachel.
If you haven't yet faxed the comments, then it may actually be easier (and it would definitely make a clearer copy for us to review) if you were instead to e-mail the comments to DiabloCanyonEIS@nrc.gov. I can confirm receipt, if you'd like.
If you fax the comments, then they have to go through an additional scanning step that invariably makes a harder-to-read copy, on top of whatever resolution loss occurs during faxing. That said, we can certainly accept the faxed copy if that is your preference.
Please let me know if you have any questions, or if there's anything I can do to facilitate your getting the comments to us.
- Best, Drew
Original Message-----
From: Rachel MacDonald [1]
Sent: Monday, April 12, 2010 12:08 PM To: Stuyvenberg, Andrew; Maier, Bill Cc: Barbara Byron
Subject:
RE: Diablo Canyon Comments Andrew, FYI-We re faxing comments over the comments on DCPP today.
Rachel Rachel A. MacDonald Nuclear Policy Advisor California Energy Commission 1516 9th Street MS-30 Sacramento, CA 95814 (916) 654-4862 office
>>> "Stuyvenberg, Andrew" <Andrew.Stuyvenberg@nrc.gov> 3/16/2010 2:24 PM >>>
Rachel - We're accepting comments through April 12. See http://www.nrc.gov/reactors/operating/licensing/renewal/applications/diablo-canyon.html for additional schedule information.
The FRN for the comment period begins at 75 FR 4427. I have attached it to this e-mail. Note that the FRN indicates that comments must be postmarked by April 10, though we'll accept them through April 12 in order to
2 provide scoping participants the full 75-day period that we'd intended (the FRN was published two days later than we anticipated). This is 15 days longer than our standard scoping period because we recognize that there is a high level of public interest in this review.
Please let me know if you have any further questions.
Best regards, Drew
Original Message-----
From: Rachel MacDonald [2]
Sent: Tuesday, March 16, 2010 4:39 PM To: Stuyvenberg, Andrew; Maier, Bill
Subject:
follow up to 3/3 meeting
- Andrew, I am working on comments to submit to the NRC regarding the SEIS. When are those comments due? I'm trying to find federal register notice info or something that indicates where/when we can submit comments.
- thanks, Rachel A. MacDonald Nuclear Policy Advisor California Energy Commission 1516 9th Street MS-30 Sacramento, CA 95814 (916) 654-4862 office
Hearing Identifier:
DiabloCanyon_LicenseRenewal_NonPublic Email Number:
926 Mail Envelope Properties (A39E93AC528D144995E76C6AB82D5D970354C38278)
Subject:
RE: Diablo Canyon Comments Sent Date:
4/12/2010 12:15:01 PM Received Date:
4/12/2010 12:15:00 PM From:
Stuyvenberg, Andrew Created By:
Andrew.Stuyvenberg@nrc.gov Recipients:
"'Barbara Byron'" <Bbyron@energy.state.ca.us>
Tracking Status: None
"'Rachel MacDonald'" <Rmacdona@energy.state.ca.us>
Tracking Status: None "Maier, Bill" <Bill.Maier@nrc.gov>
Tracking Status: None Post Office:
HQCLSTR02.nrc.gov Files Size Date & Time MESSAGE 2604 4/12/2010 12:15:00 PM Options Priority:
Standard Return Notification:
No Reply Requested:
No Sensitivity:
Normal Expiration Date:
Recipients Received: