ML102460121
| ML102460121 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Haddam Neck File:Connecticut Yankee Atomic Power Co icon.png |
| Issue date: | 09/10/2010 |
| From: | Goshen J, Rich S NRC/NMSS/SFST/LID/LB |
| To: | |
| Rich, S NMSS/SFST/LID/LB 492-3218 | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML102460099 | List: |
| References | |
| TAC L24381 | |
| Download: ML102460121 (2) | |
Text
SAFETY EVALUATION BY THE OFFICE OF NUCLEAR MATERIALS SAFETY AND SECURITY RELATED TO AMENDMENT NO. 203 TO FACILITY OPERATING LICENSE NO. DPR-61 CONNECTICUT YANKEE ATOMIC POWER COMPANY HADDAM NECK PLANT DOCKET NO. 50-213
1.0 INTRODUCTION
By application dated April 4, 2009 (Agencywide Document and Access Management System (ADAMS) Accession No. ML091250324) and re-submitted March 30, 2010, (ML1011000480)
Connecticut Yankee Atomic Power Company (CYAPC, the licensee) requested changes to the Haddam Neck Plant Facility Operating License (DPR-61).
The proposed amendment would change the title of the Physical Security Plan in the Operating License to reflect the proper title. The change will replace Haddam Neck Plant Defueled Physical Security Plan with Haddam Neck Plant ISFSI Physical Security Plan.
2.0 BACKGROUND
Haddam Neck completed the transfer of their spent fuel to the independent spent fuel storage installation (ISFSI) in 2005. In 2007, they completed decommissioning of the reactor site and a portion of the site was released from the license.
3.0 EVALUATION The proposed change is administrative in nature. Haddam Neck Plant ISFSI Physical Security Plan is the current NRC-approved Physical Security Plan. The proposed change does not reduce the commitments in the Physical Security Plan or adversely affect operation of the ISFSI.
4.0 STATE CONSULTATION
In accordance with the Commission's regulations, the Connecticut State official was notified of the proposed issuance of the amendment. The State official had no comments.
5.0 ENVIRONMENTAL CONSIDERATION
This amendment involves a change in an administrative requirement. Accordingly, this amendment meets the eligibility criteria for categorical exclusion set forth in 10 CFR 51.22(c)(10)(ii). Pursuant to 10 CFR 51.22(b) no environmental impact statement or environmental assessment need be prepared in connection with the issuance of the amendment.
6.0 CONCLUSION
The Commission has concluded, based on the considerations discussed above that: (1) there is reasonable assurance that the health and safety and safety of the public will not be endangered by operation in the proposed manner, (2) such activities will be conducted in compliance with the Commissions regulations, and (3) the issuance of the amendment will not be inimical to the common defense and security or to the health and safety of the public.
Principal Contributors:
J. Goshen S. Rich Date: September 10, 2010