Letter Sequence Request |
|---|
TAC:ME1872, Clarify Application of Setpoint Methodology for LSSS Functions (Approved, Closed) |
|
MONTHYEARRBG-46932, License Amendment Request 2009-05 to Support Operation with 24-Month Fuel Cycles2009-08-10010 August 2009
License Amendment Request 2009-05 to Support Operation with 24-Month Fuel Cycles
Project stage: Request
ML0926604942009-09-23023 September 2009
Acceptance Review Email, License Amendment Request, Modify Technical Specification Surveillance Requirement Frequencies from 18- to 24-Month Fuel Cycle Intervals
Project stage: Acceptance Review
RBG-46985, Unit 1, Supplement to License Amendment Request (LAR) LAR 2009-05, Dated August 10, 2009 Regarding 24-Month Fuel Cycles2009-12-0808 December 2009
Unit 1, Supplement to License Amendment Request (LAR) LAR 2009-05, Dated August 10, 2009 Regarding 24-Month Fuel Cycles
Project stage: Supplement
ML1009802322010-04-0808 April 2010
E-mail, Request for Additional Information, License Amendment Request, Modify Technical Specification Surveillance Requirement Frequencies from 18- to 24-Month Fuel Cycle Intervals
Project stage: RAI
RBG-47021, Response to Request for Additional Information on License Amendment Request 2009-05, 24-Month Fuel Cycles2010-04-22022 April 2010
Response to Request for Additional Information on License Amendment Request 2009-05, 24-Month Fuel Cycles
Project stage: Response to RAI
ML1013302722010-05-13013 May 2010
Request for Additional Information Regarding 24 Month Cycle
Project stage: RAI
RBG-47043, Modification of License Amendment Request by Withdrawing the Proposed Changes Related to TS 3.3.8.1, Loss of Power Instrumentation2010-06-16016 June 2010
Modification of License Amendment Request by Withdrawing the Proposed Changes Related to TS 3.3.8.1, Loss of Power Instrumentation
Project stage: Request
05000458/LER-2010-001, Regarding Control Building Chiller Inoperable Greater than Allowable Outage Time2010-06-16016 June 2010
Regarding Control Building Chiller Inoperable Greater than Allowable Outage Time
Project stage: Request
ML1019300932010-07-12012 July 2010
E-mail, Bases Markups Related to License Amendment Request to Modify Technical Specification Surveillance Requirement Frequencies from 18- to 24-Month Fuel Cycle Intervals
Project stage: Request
ML1019301002010-07-12012 July 2010
Bases Markups Related to License Amendment Request to Modify Technical Specification Surveillance Requirement Frequencies from 18- to 24-Month Fuel Cycle Intervals
Project stage: Request
ML1020905542010-07-28028 July 2010
E-mail from Entergy Operations, Inc. Re River Bend Stations 24-Month Fuel Cycle License Amendment Request
Project stage: Request
ML1021802512010-08-0606 August 2010
E-mail, Request for Additional Information, Round 3, License Amendment Request, Modify Technical Specification Surveillance Requirement Frequencies from 18- to 24-Month Fuel Cycle Intervals
Project stage: RAI
ML1023501552010-08-17017 August 2010
Response to Request for Additional Information on License Amendment Request 2009-05, 24-month Fuel Cycles
Project stage: Response to RAI
ML1023502662010-08-31031 August 2010
Issuance of Amendment No. 168, Modify Technical Specification Surveillance Requirement Frequencies from 18- to 24-Month Fuel Cycle Intervals
Project stage: Approval
ML13350A1612015-02-10010 February 2015
Correction to Safety Evaluation Related to Amendment No. 168 Which Modified Techical Specification Surveillance Requirement Frequencies from 18- to 24-Month Fuel Cycle Intervals; Enclosed New SE Section 3.1.7B
Project stage: Approval
2010-06-16
[Table View] |
Text
From:
WILLIAMSON, DANNY H [DWILL21@entergy.com]
Sent:
Wednesday, July 28, 2010 1:22 PM To:
Wang, Alan
Subject:
FW: TS Bases revisions Alan Regarding the I&C reviewer's question concerning our markup of the TS Bases in our application for 24-month fuel cycles, we will alter our planned revisions to delete the reference to "operating experience" as a basis for extension of a Surveillance Requirement from 18 to 24 months.
For example, the current wording typically reads, "Operating experience has shown these components usually pass the Surveillance when performed at the 18 month Frequency." This statement is found in numerous locations in the Bases.
We will revise such statements to read, typically, "Instrument drift analysis has concluded that the components can be reliably expected to pass the Surveillance when performed at the 24 month Frequency."
Please let me know if there are any further questions on this matter.
Danny Williamson RBS Licensing E-mail Properties Mail Envelope Properties (A7C9762EBF7BD843B5B5977D3EE3B4EC085386E6)
Subject:
FW: TS Bases revisions Sent Date: 7/28/2010 1:23:08 PM Received Date: 7/28/2010 1:23:08 PM From: WILLIAMSON, DANNY H Created By: DWILL21@entergy.com Recipients:
Alan.Wang@nrc.gov (Wang, Alan)
Tracking Status: None Post Office:
CCTEXETSP006.etrsouth.corp.entergy.com Files Size Date & Time
MESSAGE 2733 7/28/2010 Options Expiration Date:
Priority: olImportanceNormal ReplyRequested: True Return Notification: False Sensitivity: olNormal Recipients received:
