Text

301 Final Administrative Documents (Section 7)
	ML101600050
Person / Time
Site:	Summer
Issue date:	03/28/2010
From:	; NRC/RGN-II
To:	;
References
	Download: ML101600050 (80)
	v • d • e

{{#Wiki_filter:Administralive Documents (Yellow Paper) i I J 2

7N 7 C. 1. Exam Preparation Checklist 2. Exam Outline Quality Checklist 3. Exam Security Agreement(s) 4. Administrative Topics Outline (Final) 5. Control Room Systems & Facility Walk-through T (Final) 6. Operating Test Quality Check Sheet 7. Simulator Scenario Quality Check Sheet 8. Transient and Event Checklist 9. Competencies Checklist 10. Written Exam Quality Check Sheet 11. Written Exam Review Worksheet 12. Written Exam Grading Quality Checklist 13. Post-Exam Check Sheet 14. Facility Submittal Letter() ES-201-/ ES-201 -2/ ES-201-3 ES-301-1/ est Outline ES-301-2/ / ES-301-3 ES-301-4/ ES-301-5 ES-301-6 ES-401-6 ES-401-9/ ES-403-1/ ES-501 -1 [Vi Administrative Documents (Yellow Paper)

1.

Exam Preparation Checklist.................... ES-201-1 /

2.

Exam Outline Quality Checklist.................. ES-201-2/

3.

Exam Security Agreement(s)................... ES-201-3

4.

Administrative Topics Outline (Final).............. ES-301-1/

5.

Control Room Systems & Facility Walk-through Test Outline (Final)..................................... ES-301-2t1'

6.

Operating Test Quality Check Sheet.............. ES-301-3/

7.

Simulator Scenario Quality Check Sheet.......... ES-301-4/

8.

Transient and Event Checklist................... ES-301-51

9.

Competencies Checklist....................... ES-301-6/

10.

Written Exam Quality Check Sheet............... ES-401-6 /

11.

Written Exam Review Worksheet................ ES-401-9!

12.

Written Exam Grading Quality Checklist........... ES-403-1/

13.

Post-Exam Check Sheet...................... ES-501-1

14.

Facility Submittal Letter ( [ 0

ES-201, Rev. 9E Examination Preparation Checklist Form ES-201-1 Facility: Summer Date of Examination: 06/04/2007 Facility NRC Exammations Developed by: Written / Operating Test T Chief Task Description (Reference) Examiners Initials -180 1. Examination administration date confirmed (C. 1.a; C.2.a and b) 02/13/2007 -120 2. NRC examiners and facility contact assigned (C.1.d; C.2.e) 02/13/2007 -120 3. Facility contact briefed on security and other requirements (C.2.c) 02/13/2007 -120 4. Corporate notification letter sent (C.2.d) 2/14/2007 [-90] [5. Reference material due (C. 1.e; C.3.c; Attachment 2)] 03/06/2007 {-75 } 6. Integrated examination outline(s) due, including Forms ES-20 1 -2, ES-20 1-3, ES-3/21/2007 301-1, ES-301-2, ES-301-5, ES-D-ls, ES-401-1/2, ES-401-3, and ES-401-4, as (3/27/2007)< applicable (C.1.e and f; C.3.d) {-70} {7. Examination outline(s) reviewed by NRC and feedback provided to facility 3/26/2007 licensee (C.2.h; C.3.e)} {-45} 8. Proposed examinations (including written, walk-through JPMs, and scenarios, as applicable), supporting documentation (including Forms ES-301-3, ES-301-4, 4/16/2007 ES-301-5, ES-301-6, and ES-401-6), and reference materials due (C.1.e, f g and h; C.3.d) -30 9. Preliminary license applications (NRC Form 398s) due (C. 1.1; C.2.g; ES-202) 5/07/2007 -14

10. Final license applications due and Form ES-201-4 prepared (C.1.l; C.2.i; ES-202) 5/21/2007

-14

11. Examination approved by NRC supervisor for facility licensee review 5/21/2007 (C.2.h; C.3.t)

-14

12. Examinations reviewed with facility licensee (C.1.j; C.2.f and h; C.3.g) 5/21/2007 5/27/2007

-7

13. Written examinations and operating tests approved by NRC supervisor (5/31/07) -O (C.2.i; C.3.h)

(6/ll/2007)-W -7

14. Final applications reviewed; 1 or 2 (if>10) applications audited to confirm qualifications / eligibility; and examination approval and waiver letters sent 5/27/2007 (C.2.i;_Attachment_4;_ES-202,_C.2.e;_ES-204)

-7

15. Proctoring/written exam administration guidelines reviewed with facility licensee 5/27/2007 (C.3.k)

-7

16. Approved scenarios, job performance measures, and questions distributed to 5/27/2007 ç NRC examiners (C.3.i)

(6/04/2007) Target dates are generally based on facility-prepared examinations and are keyed to the examination date identified in the corporate notification letter. They are for planning purposes and may be adjusted on a case by-case basis in coordination with the facility licensee. [Applies only] {Does not apply} to examinations prepared by the NRC. / ES-201, Rev. 9E Examination Preparation Checklist Form ES-201-1 Facility: Summer Date of Examination: 06/04/2007 Examinations Developed by: Facility NRC Written I Operating Test Target Chief Date

Task Description (Reference)

Examiner's Initials -180

1.

Examination administration date confIrmed (C.1.a; C.2.a and b) 02113/2007 -120

2.

NRC examiners and facility contact assigned (C.1.d; C.2.e) 02/13/2007 -120

3.

Facility contact briefed on security and other requirements (C.2.c) 02/13/2007 -120

4.

Corporate notifIcation letter sent (C.2.d) 2/14/2007 [-90] [S. Reference material due (C. I.e; C.3.c; Attachment 2)] 03/06/2007 {-7S}

6.

Integrated examination outline(s) due, including Forms ES-201-2, ES-201-3, ES-3/2112007 )~ 301-1, ES-301-2, ES-301-S, ES-D-1 's, ES-401-1/2, ES-401-3, and ES-401-4, as (3/27/2007),:, applicable (C. I.e and f; C.3.d) {-70} {7. Examination outline(s) reviewed by NRC and feedback provided to facility 3/26/2007 licensee (C.2.h; C.3.e)} {-4S}

8.

Proposed examinations (including written, walk-through JPMs, and scenarios, as applicable), supporting documentation (including Forms ES-301-3, ES-301-4, 4/16/2007 ES-301-S, ES-301-6, and ES-401-6), and reference materials due (C. I.e, f, g and h; C.3.d) -30

9.

Preliminary license applications (NRC Form 398's) due (C.l.l; C.2.g; ES-202) S/07/2007 -14

10. Final license applications due and Form ES-201-4 prepared (C.1.l; C.2.i; ES-202)

S121/2007 -14

11. Examination approved by NRC supervisor for facility licensee review S/2112007 (C.2.h; C.3.+/-)

-14

12. Examinations reviewed with facility licensee (C.1.j; C.2.f and h; C.3.g)

S/21/2007 S/27/2007 ~ -7

13. Written examinations and operating tests approved by NRC supervisor (S/31107) -0 (C.2.i; C.3.h)

(611112007)-W -7

14. Final applications reviewed; 1 or 2 (if> 10) applications audited to confrrm qualifIcations / eligibility; and examination approval and waiver letters sent S127/2007 (C.2.i; Attachment 4; ES-202, C.2.e; ES-204)

-7 IS. Proctoringlwritten exam administration guidelines reviewed with facility licensee SI27/2007 (C.3.k) -7

16. Approved scenarios, job performance measures, and questions distributed to S/27/2007

~ NRC examiners (C.3.i) (6/04/2007),,/ \\I Target dates are generally based on facility-prepared examinations and are keyed to the examination date identifIed in the corporate notifIcation letter. They are for planning purposes and may be adjusted on a case-by-case basis in coordination with the facility licensee. [Applies only] {Does not apply} to examinations prepared by the NRC.

ES-201 Examination Outline Quality Checklist Form ES-201-2 Facility: V.C. Summer Date of Examination: 6/4/2007 IniiiIc Item Task Description b-1. a. Verily that the outline(s) fit(s) the appropriate model per ES-401. b. Assess whether the outline was systematically and randomly prepared in accordance W with Section D.1 of ES-401 and whether all K/A categories are appropriately sampled. c. Assess whether the outline over-emphasizes any systems, evolutions, or generic topics. : T d. Assess whether the justifications for deselected or rejected K/A statements are T appropriate. 4j 2. a. Using Form ES-301 -5, verify that the proposed scenario sets cover the required number of normal evolutions, instrument and component failures, technical specifications, and s major transients. I b. Assess whether there are enough scenario sets (and spares) to test the projected M number and mix of applicants in accordance with the expected crew composition and rotation schedule without compromising exam integrity; and ensure that each applicant cn.< ly 1Q U can be tested using at least one new or significantly modified scenario, that no L scenarios are duplicated from the applicants audit test(s), and scenarios will not be A repeated on subsequent days. T c. To the extent possible, assess whether the outline(s) conform(s) with the qualitative and 0 quantitative criteria specified on Form ES-301-4 and described in Appendix 0. R 3. a. Verify that systems walk-through outline meets the criteria specified on Form ES-301-2: (1) the outline(s) contain(s) the required number of control room and in-plant tasks, W distributed among the safety functions as specified on the form (2) task repetition from the last two NRC examinations is within the limits specified on i1/ the form, (3)* no tasks are duplicated from the applicants audit test(s) (4) the number of alternate path, low-power, emergency and RCA tasks meet the criteria on the form. b. Verify that the administrative outline meets the criteria specified on Form ES-301-1: (1) the tasks are distributed among the topics as specified on the form (2) at least one task is new or significantly modified (3) no more than one task is repeated from the last two NRC licensing examinations c. Determine if there are enough different outlines to test the projected number and mix of applicants and ensure that no items are duplicated on subsequent days. 4. a. Assess whether plant-specific priorities (including PRA and IPE insights) are covered in the appropriate exam section. G b. Assess whether the 10CFR 55.41 /43 and 55.45 sampling is appropriate.

c. Ensure that K/A importance ratings (except for plant-specific priorities) are at least 2.5. G3

E d. Check for duplication and overlap among exam sections.

e. Check the entire exam for balance of coverage. L f. Assess whether the exam fits the appropriate job level (R0 or SRO). P nt d tfi Signature Date a. Author Joseph G. Arsenault 4/12/2007 b. Facility Reviewer (*) f4. %44t47 tO 7 c. NRC Chief Examiner (#) ) hJCJ c3-,. 5)3( /2a;1 d. NRC Supervisor I -)t.\\tr/ )4.J,/ NOTE:

Independent NRC reviewer initial items in Column c, chief examiner concurrence required.

NUREG1021, Revision 9 ES-201 Examination Outline Quality Checklist Form ES-201-2 Facility: V.C. Summer Date of ExaminatiOn: 6/4/2007 Item Task Description Initials a b* c:#

1.

a. Verify that the outline(s) fit(s) the appropriate model per ES-401.

~ '10- ~

b. Assess whether the outline was systematically and randomly prepared in accordance

~ L *,A'I W with Section D.1 of ES-401 and whether all KiA categories are appropriately sampled. R Assess whether the outline over-emphasizes any systems, evolutions, or generic topics. \\iL L J. I

c.

T

d. Assess whether the justifications for deselected or rejected KiA statements are

~ ) T appropriate. ~ M E N

2.

a. Using Form ES-301-5, verify that the proposed scenario sets cover the required number

~ ..,.. JJ of normal evolutions, instrument and component failures, technical specifications, and ~ S major transients. I

b. Assess whether there are enough scenario sets (and spares) to test the projected M

number and mix of applicants in accordance with the expected crew composition and ~.-J U rotation schedule without compromising exam integrity; and ensure that each applicant ~ can be tested using at least one new or significantly modified scenario, that no L scenarios are duplicated from the applicants' audit test(s), and scenarios will not be A repeated on subsequent days. T

c. To the extent possible, assess whether the outline(s) conform(s) with the qualitative and Jf 0

quantitative criteria specified on Form ES-301-4 and described in Appendix D. ~ '¥- R

3.

a. Verify that systems walk-through outline meets the criteria specified on Form ES-301-2:

Jf (1 ) the outline(s) contain(s) the required number of control room and in-plant tasks, W distributed among the safety functions as specified on the form 1 (2) task repetition from the last two NRC examinations is within the limits specified on If T the form, (3)* no tasks are duplicated from the applicants' audit test(s) (4) the number of alternate path, low-power, emergency and RCA tasks meet the criteria on the form.

b. Verify that the administrative outline meets the criteria specified on Form ES-301-1:

(1 ) the tasks are distributed among the topics as specified on the form 'J?N. ~. (2) at least one task is new or significantly modified (3) no more than one task is repeated from the last two NRC licensing examinations {'

c.

Determine if there are enough different outlines to test the projected number and mix of UU4 Te- £! V applicants and ensure that no items are duplicated on subsequent days.

4.

a. Assess whether plant-specific priorities (including PRA and IPE insights) are covered in

<JM 'f) the appropriate exam section. ~. ; ~ G

b. Assess whether the 10CFR 55.41/43 and 55.45 sampling is appropriate.

~ {I-'- E Ensure that KiA importance ratings (except for plant-specific priorities) are at least 2.5. ~ ~ t N

c.

E

d. Check for duplication and overlap among exam sections.

J(tILl. ~')-. R Check the entire exam for balance of coverage. If1tA '7 A

e.

L

f.

Assess whether the exam fits the appropriate job level (RO or SRO). (f?}:/J 12.......- ~;~~Signatury Date

a.

Author Joseph G. Arsenault 4/1212007

b.

Facility Reviewer (*) (fit/t(ft'£.' lYvldid 1/v~~~;/( ;)1,U)(} "flrf/) ~ 0]_

c.

NRC Chief Examiner (#) 6b12ih~ ~J. L~\\$GA [=tlUA" Vc0'Cfc.es-T~ 5/3/ 2c.v1

d.

NRC Supervisor

,;,h'--r r r)M(,..l ~IJ j

i~7-5/7,,;/:-1 / NOTE:

Independent NRC reviewer initial items in Column "c", chief examiner concurrence required.

NUREG-1021, Revision 9

ES-201 Examination Security Agreement Form ES-201-3 / u \\ I ..c7 I acknowledge that I have acquired specialized knowledge about the NRC licensing examinations scheduled for the week(s) of / as of the date of my signature. I agree that I will not knowingly divulge any information about these examinations to any persons who have not been authorized by the NRC chief examiner. I understand that I am not to instruct, evaluate, or provide performance feedback to those applicants scheduled to be administered these licensing examinations from this date until completion of examination administration, except as specifically noted below and authorized by the NRC (e.g., acting as a simulator booth operator or communicator is acceptable if the individual does not select the training content or provide direct or indirect feedback). Furthermore, I am aware of the physical security measures and requirements (as documented in the facility licensees procedures) and understand that violation of the conditions of this agreement may result in cancellation of the examinations and/or an enforcement action against me or the facility licensee. I will immediately report to facility management or the NRC chief examiner any indications or suggestions that examination security may have been compromised. 2. Post-Examination To the best of my knowledge, I did not divulge to any unauthorized persons any information concerning the NRC licensing examinations administered during the week(s) of From the date that 1 entered into this security agreement until the completion of examination administration, I did not instruct, evaluate, or provide performance feedback to those applicants who were administered these licensing examinations, except as specifically noted below and authorized by the NRC.

1..W4U.AL..3jr1c1L_.

£1111101 3 4. 5. 6.7.J_ 8. LM< 9. 1 13.

15.._.._,.. NOTES: r A /4/7. ES-201, Page 26 of 27 1. Pre-Examination I PRINTED NAME JOB TITLE / RESPONSIBILITY . f-; SIGNATURE (1) aiJJ1\\r.i k UJ. C C.4 .z. I DATE SIGNATURE () DATE NOTE 3Lja,7 PAJfl/trAZI,% I-J;- 11 12 C .I2 I1 0) 0) C0-a 0) 00) N3 0) C) (a 0 I-.0 .c_i_ th ZL4 XEI 1 //C) 4 14 x - Az ------ z___ t,,sri L a E 1Z&Z &J-QL ES-201 Examination Security Agreement Form ES-2D1-3 !i \\ /! r-

1.

Pre-Examination j\\J F ....,\\.., t:)< {J.. A.N\\ ~~i,;,- ..,it/C I I acknowledge that I have acquired specialized knowledge about the NRC licensing examinatior.s scheduled for the week(s) of {.Jv",-"-, as of the date of my signature. I agree that I will not knowingly divulge any information about these examinations to any persons who have not been authorized by the NRC chief examiner. I understand that I am not to instruct. evaluate, or provide performance feedback to those applicants scheduled to be administered these licensing examinations from this date until completion of examination administration, except as specifically noted below and authorized by the NRC (e.g" acting as a simulator booth operator or communicator is acceptable if the individual does not select the training content or provide direct or indirect feedback). Furthermore. I am aware of the physical security measures and requirements (as documented in the facility licensee's procedures) and understand that violation of the conditions of this agreement may result in cancellation of the examinations and/or an enforcement action against me or the facility licensee. I will immediately report to facility management or the NRC chief examiner any indications or suggestions that examination security may have been compromised.

2.

Post-Examination To the best of my knowledge, I did not divulge to any unauthorized persons any information concerning the NRC licensing examinations administered during the week(s) of . From the date that I entered into this security agreement until the completion of examination administration. I did not instruct, evaluate, or provide performance feedback to those applicants who were administered these licensing examinations, except as specifically noted below and authorized by the NRC.

1. §\\t~:;:::: ___ ~:~:~:~_~:~P::SI~~L~_Y._ ~vcc-~_:;;;l-SIGNATUR~:;~~;: __

~2~~_:p~~J ___________ __ '~~"--?P!!JU,.:PD~_~_;_"____ __.... '.. ~~~..1.btfiJ-~,4N'- s.j414~ -~_.p-

i7"-~~2 __ _

~:~:~i5:}~}1I;;f~2£=====~?::li3::..==~~====_~=======:~~:~c~_tJ;~J~=~~~==~~=-J$~.. ;li2t.7~c~ 0 ,-~ ~L=t~~Wy

5. -~-~ST'f?-~?f1--.-.. ---- --.!?-f1~.ef~(r:£~~--L:~~H~~~---.. ----;:-.. -:~._c- -----7-----~j_. ~~;f~)-*-7i.t!-Jf-

--;---11----o/. .&~ .. ~~ -~ 6, _-!~t.,j_L... S:::J_=_L<d.:~l ** _':i:::: ___, ____..l!.'::;&'-L:::."IL"L5:;n-'"0"-Lp,!. _____ ----- =t,----:..._,..,. - - &c'..:: ____. ___..J..t'.LL/!'--'-- ".f'l':' '~--::':::::::::~"'",,~-..:.<.£.1.7.-.-;-1---

7. -A-vJ~~.tJ.tl~------

--~ft:_.-.. -----.~--------------.. ------ -- - -"..

{::!I-~ --

,~-' - t~=--rli~- ~: =~~~~~~~1~:i~==~e\\t~t~!1t;~~~~===~-;;- ~.'~~~~?- 3~~==~tJ-==, = ~~~~. 10,-~~J~-w::~-1J:£..------~~ .. -t:---~-~Q-------------... -,",,\\'" '.¥f" - --- _____ ~..: __.:J ---- -- &..:-It).**l!.?-- 11 it~.~\\\\'(\\c" DS::I'el\\l_.0);':.U':L ___ Llf~.b-_________________ __ ~G'~""': Q ___ ;)".-_=.".~-o:: ___ J.p_:'_?:!. 2_'7. ____ ~~_ ~ ____ ~~ tJ2-"t---

12. _________.. _. ________________________________________________________________, ________________________________________________ _

13. ___________________________,. ______________________________... __________,, _____. _____________________________________________ _

14. __........ _____....... _______________ _ _______..: ___________________________.. ____________________, ____. ____ ' ________.. _ ________ _______________________ _ ________ _ 15_, ___,_.. ___________.. ___.__ _ _ __.. ____________, _____________________.. _ -_________________.. _____,,__ _ ______ _________ _____________ _ ___.. ____ _ NOTES: ES-201, Page 26 of 27 I ~ (Xl (J.) N o o -..J (Xl o (J.) N (J.) ~ w o ...... o

ES-201 Examination Security Agreement Form ES-201-3 h /

Pe-Exarnination V - ) ).j-k vk4,,/ I acknowledge that I have acquired specialized knowledge about the NRC licensing examinatic;s scheduled for the week(s) of as of the date of my signature. I agree that I will not knowingly divulge any information about these examinations to any persons who have riot been authorized by the NRC chief examiner. I understand that I am not to instruct, evaluate, or provide performance feedback to those applicants scheduled to be administered these licensing examinations from this date until completion of examination administration, except as specifically noted below and authorized by the NRC (e.g, acting as a simulator booth operator or communicator is acceptable if the individual does not selet the training content or provide direct or indirect feedback). Furthermore, I am aware of the physical security measures and requirements (as documented in the facility licensees procedures> and understand that violation of the conditions of this agreement may result in cancellation of the examinations and/or an enforcement action against me or the facility licensee. I will immediately report to facility management or the NRC chief examiner any indications or suggestions that examination security may have been compromised. 2. Post-Examination 1.

2. 7}/Y

3. Lji____

4. --

j_?j__ 5.

8. _L

9..2zJ+/-_

1 11 12. ffl.ALD3.S / 1 14 15.L3iJif NOTES: .51Zc

R C-)

DATE lGNATURE (2) DATE NOTE

/2 . i7/ / LLkJ.. ( 1._EL i L+/-._ -,.Z_ aZZ L _J/_

4. :L:?:

(-j12 -z J-r-7 2 .vivi. 4 / -ULt 1+/-&7 .1 ,.) tt$ C) _._.r J3Q-0J .- z3-7 -.-7 - z-t 07 IL: 2_rL2 ES-201, Page 26 of 27 PRINTED NAME To the best of my knowledge I did not divulge to any unauthorized persons any information concerning the NRC licensing examinations administered during the week(s) of From the date that I entered into this security agreement until the completion of examination administraticn, I did not instruct, evaluate, or provide performance feedback to those applicants who were administered these licensing examinations, except as spcifically rioted below and authorized by the NRC. JOB TITLE / RESPONSIBILITY C) 0) SIGNATURE (1) EEZEEE 1ZZThk (pv P. ---) ES-201 Examination Security Agreement Form ES-201-3

A I'

i.

Pre-Examination_ V'. L ~.) v..,Nt 'lVl...4 -/'1/01 <d-I acknowledge that I have acquired specialized knowledge about the NRC licensing examinatic:1s scheduled for the week(s) of ~1I(01-as of th~ date of my signature. I agree that I will not knowingly divulge any information about these examinations to any persons who have no been authorized by the NRC chief examiner. I understand that I am not to instruct, evaluate, or provide performance feedback to those applicants scheduled to be administered ttlese licensir~g examinations from this date until completion of examination administration, except as specifically noted below and Cluthorized by the NRC (e.g., acting as a simulator booth operator or communicator is acceptable if the individual does not seleCt the training content or provide direct or indirect feedback). Furthermore, I am aware of the physical security measures and requirements (as documented in the facility licensee's procedures) and understand that violation of the conditions of this agreement may result in cancellation of the examinations and/or an enforcement action against me or the facility licensee. I will immediately report to facility management or the NRC chief examiner any indications or suggestions that examination security may have been compromised.

2.

Post*Examination To the best of my knowledge, I did not divulge to any unauthorized persons any information concerning the NRC licensing examinations administered during the week(s} of . From the date trlat I entered into this security agreement until the completion of examination administratic-n, I did not . instruct. evaluate, or provide perforrnance feedback to those applicants who were administered these licensing eXaminations, except as sp':ldfically noted below and authorized by the NRC. ES-201, Page 26 of 27 I (fl (") >> (X) (J) N o o -...J (X) o (J) N (J) ~ !-Po o o

ES-.201 Examination Security Agreement Form ES2O1-3 1. Pre-Examination I acknowledge that I have acquired specialized knowledge about the NRC licensing examinations scheduled for the week(s) of as of thG date of my signature. I agree that I will not knowingly divulge any information about these examinations to any persops who have not been authorized by the NRC chief examiner. I understand that I am not to instruct, evaluate, or provide performance feedback to those applicants scheduled to be ic1rninistered these licensing examinations from this date until completion of examination administration, except as specifically noted below and authorized by the NRC (e.g., acting as a simulator booth operator or communicator is acceptable if the individual does not select the training content or provide direct or indirect feedback). Furthermore, I am aware of the physical security measures and requirements (as documented in the facility licensees procedures) and understand that violation of the conditions of this agreement may result in cancellation of the examinations andlor an enforcement action against me or the facility licensee. I will immediately report to facility management or the NRC chief examiner any indications or suggestions that examination security may have been compromised. 2. Post-Examination To the best of my knowledge, I did not divulge to any unauthorized persons any information concerning the NRC licensing examinations administered during the week(s) of From the date that I entered into this security agreement until the completion of examination administration, I did not instruct, evaluate or.provlde performance feedback to those applicants who were administered these licensing examinations, except as specifically noted below and authorized by the NRC. S S. 00 -5] 0 0) 0) 0 rn 01 0I0 10.

ii 1 2,..

I 14. 15. NOTES: ES-201, Page 26 of 27 I Ca C) z PRINTED NAME 1

ss: 2. Jj&Z7 3.

4.5.tfl4 7. 8. S. JOB TITLE! RESPONSIBILITY SlGNATdR (1) DATE SIGN5,TURE (2) DATE NOTE jQQ 3/7 4LJ L1L_Zt ..._.zz Jj/J ysto.7 U cc-. -.Zk f2 I. ES-201 Examination Security Agreement Form ES.. 201*3 1. Pre-Examination I acknowledge that I have acquired specialized knowledge about the NRC licensing examinations scheduled for the weekes) of as of th~ date of my signature. I agree that I will not knowingly divulge any information about these examinations to any perso!ls who have not been authorized by the NRC chief examiner. I understand that I am not to instruct, evaluate, or provide performance feedback to those applicants scheduled to be administered these licensing examinations from this date until completion of examination administration, except as specifically noted below and authorized by the NRC (e.g., acting as a simulator booth operator or communicator is acceptable if the individual does not select the training content or provide direct or indirect feedback). Furthermore, I arn aware of the physical security measures and requirements (as documented in the facility licensee's procedures) and understand that violation of the conditions of this agreement may result in cancellation of the examinations and/or an enforcement action against me or the facility licensee. I will immediately report to facility management or the NRC chief examiner any indications or suggestions that examination security may have been compromised.

2.

Post-Examination To the best of my knowledge, I did not divulge to any unauthorized persons any information concerning the NRC licensing examinations administered during the week(s) of . From the date that I entered into this security agreement until the completion of examination administration. I did not instruct, evaluate, D[ provide performance feedback to those applicants who were administered these licensing examinations, except as specifically noted below and authorized by the NRC. PRINTED NAME JOB TITLE / RESPONSIBILITY DATE NOTE 1 :S~s.~~~~1f:..~~~t ---------~Q-;.;r---~------;'~.-- J:i{P.:2:! __ 2.1;Ll~-"/ft:.dL-7L_-- _;i'i~j4:::lP..!.L-!.!14L.J.l!U,lkY.f.(L ---

3. _-.::fl.2-Y_'-_,* -Eg~':.'!:::..'7 ___ 5./~U/2Y.:.~_I31!..i~!.!::!-'4::~ev___ "

4. $E~-~~t!J".!f-----------f~--------.------'-------.---

5.. k§:!!.!:!. ___ ~r.::.:!.ll,L_____ _ _____.9.. _____.. ______... _________ 6.'*~f:~_L3>__~5.I.~.R~~_} _._£X:!3-_~ __ ~.E.\\.I.£:hQ:re.k::,. __ ~_-__ 't-7<::-.....J'.....- 7..... _____. _____________ _ 8.. __.. _. _____ ".. _________.. ____ _ ________. __. _______ ~~ ____ n_~ ___

9. __

._,~,, _____________,_. ___________... _____________________.... __________________. ____________________________________..... __

10. _____.. _____ ___ ________ _ ______. ______. __________________. _______________,________ _____ _________________ __. _______ _

~ 1 '.. ______ ~ _____________.__ _ __________. ____________. __________________. ____________________....... --_________.____________ _. _____ _ 12, ____________._. _______.. __. __. ___. ________________________ ~ __. ________. ________________ ------ ----------------- -~--- ---

13. ________________________. ___________________________ ------------------------- ----- ------------------- _.. --- ---

14. _____. __.. _______________ _ _________________________________ ~ _____________ ~ _____ ----- -:.----------------- -~.. ----- 15.~ ____ ~ _____________ W ___ ". __ NOTES: ES-201, Page 26 of 27 co (J) N 0 0 -..J co 0 (J) ~ N (J) )- 3: '0 )- 0 tTl (,11 0 f-' 0 'Tl ~ (f) (1) "l (1) "l

1. acknaledqe that hays ecqed specfattzcd Inowlede about the NRC IIeenaInj eaminaUorta shedu1eci Ice the waek(a cit date of y signawre. a4ee tbaU ift not.nowng dwutGe nv nfermat.ton about thsa examtrtaUons (0 any peraois t have rt b3rt eutncirIzpd by the NRC deal examIner. 1 deretatd thaI an, not to lnatrtrt. evaluate, or provide performance dbacft to lhoae uppttcarit admirifeteled thea ttoenafn examinallorts from flits date until complffon of examination administration. Otceept as epecicalfy rtc.tJ bebw arid athorted by the NRC (0.9., aabng aa a airmitator booth operator or C irnunlcator Is acCeftable It the lrtdMdual ioea not aefed the tratnln 9 eontenl or pmvkie dired or indirect feedbac)c, Furthermore, I am aware ol the phyatoal aecurily me000res and ie (as do the facility licensees procedures) and undeiatand that violation of the condtlorur of th a9raamanf may result in rceatlor of th exe rtafona anWcr art enforcement action against me or the factilty licensee. I wilt mrnedtatety report to facility rYrarlagernorit or the NRC duel examiner arty lridteeUni or Sbggin3tIOnS that exorretruetion security may have heart campromiaed. 2. 1tDliCoi2 To the best of my knowledge. did rid divulge to any unauttluorizaci paaona anY information rnin the NRC tioermrug e rrrttnatiorus adniatered clwinq the week(s) of prom the date that I entered into this secvrfty agreement wrliI the con1ption of oxarnlnatfrjn aina I dId trot riStrict. evaluate or. provkle teiiorcnance feedback to those applicants who were eninfstered theae fleensing axartilnatloret. rruccopt 00 Opecillcalfy noted bafow and authorizad by the NRC, PRINTED NAhiE JOB TITLE I RESPONSIBtLY cc 4 Ecu?4 .riaI A,jt 0) ID I-.0 rj p (f ES-O1.Page26of 27 C) hi ft 1) t? at cc 0 I hi w C, ST.. hi .1 1 hi N00 4, i. (0 CD Jp SlNATi (1) tceq DATE SI ATURC (2) DATE NOTE I7 71 . z: :zzzzzzzzzzLzz, sL fl NUTEE: I I,., fl. t-- ($1 1"'),-, If! 1'") U) 1"') CU I.£J UJ C! I- ~., .-1 I, I .:;-o o N j~ g I. fool',

E-s:2iFI----.---

_Examlnati-on Securi!y Ai!:!'-I!m~t-=---------'--------Fonn a.:ro1-3 -.. ---.-,... ".. ---.------.~--------.-... ------..

1.

~.!D .. tl"~ I ackno\\..-1F.lclge that \\ have acqui"ed spcc;al~e<t ~.no""Bdg<l about the NRC IlOerIsing e)(amjllatJons schedUled (01 the """sltts) trl <.'Ill' of Inl) dale of my signalurs. I ag1ge Inall will not "'I\\Owing!Y dIvulse anv ioformu\\ion about these IlXamln2tions to any pt!lI"lSO{l5 ~ h"'~een autnorl~~ by lhe NRC chm.r examiner. ! ISldQrSIQ~d thai I 3m not 10 inslr\\1C\\.l>Vsluale. OJ' provIde perform!!nce fo&dbetl<. to. Ihooe !lPP~cal'l1.r; sctllxluled 10. pe administered lhe$l) t\\~miitl9 &l<aminallons !tam this data until CQmpletion of examination administration. eKcell\\ as lIpeciically noted below and alJthortled hy Ihe NRC (e.!)., aollnll !lIS a I>lmula tor booth operator or commun\\ca\\nl' Is acceptable If the Indllfkll.llll cbes £lot ~elecllhe tralnfOlj comanl or provide ditel;\\ or indirect feedbad<). Furlhermole, I am _ate ollhe phYS\\(;;/I\\ soourlty rneasur&$ and requil1!tITleob (as documented In the facility licensee's PlOCedures) end understand \\ha\\ violation of 1m. corn:!i\\l¢n5 of this agre<imenl rt1aY (6SUn In r.sneertet\\cm of tl1tt exariljll~tons antl/or nn enlo.rc~ment action ;,gains! me 0( II>e !aGln!y 1ic"M~e, I ""iii immedla\\ely roporl to (1Icl!1ty managemol'l\\ or !he NRC chlet el<amlner atlY indlr,llUon" Or sugge.;!lons Ina! eKamlnalion 'l'eQUrity may have aWn cumpromis(!d.

2.

f£~_\\:!i.~ml!Jatlol'! 1'0 the besl of my Imowledge. I did no!. dlVtJlga 10 any uns,,!Jloritad pfKsona MY.nronnellon concernlfig the NRC li(;;ef\\Sillg axhrrtlril'lU""" edrl'\\inlstel'tld during Ille week(s) of ~. ____. From tM dale !nilll er)tered inlo this 5Ct:IJrity allreermnl ul1li1lhn comp\\l)-tion or cl<amlrlallon adml~tra~,on.1 did £\\0\\ illstruct. evaluate, Ot provide ~rf()fmance feedback to tilOS!;! appflC8.ots who 'IIIer~ adminIstered Ihn::oe flc;eosing axamlnatJons. t1l\\(l.tIpt as spvcilleally noled b6iow and a\\Jthoril.~l by !he NRC. ~. - ___, _____ "_~.-' _____ -------.-------_.---- -

.* -.---~.------.-.-*. --.,'- ---.,------____,_ 'M ___

10. _____________. _____ *. _

j 1. _____ -. ___ ~----._. ________......... ___.. _. __.. ________________._.. __... _.* '--_.. _.. ____. ______. __.. _. __. _____._.... _____.* __._

12._. ___.. __

~ 1 ~._.... ______. _____ "..* _

14. ____.**,,_.. ___. _____ _ --_._---_

.......*..*.* __..,.-.. _.---..---._- _. -... -.------~... ----.-.. -.-.. -....* --._-----",---------_... 15..... _. __, __._.... __,_~ __. ___ ¥ ** _~._ --_.. _-----.-....... _------... - --... - ----,,-.-----... --~---.--.--..... ---- --.-.~- ---_..... ---.-.. ------._-_._- NOTES: ES-20i, Page 26 of 27 (Xl Q') N o o --.J (Xl o Q') N Q') ~ Q') ....... o o

I acknowledge that I have acquired specialized knowledge about the NRC licensing examinations scheduled for the weeks(s) of as of the date of my signature. 1 agree that will not knowingly divulge any information about these examinations to any persons who hae not been authorized by the NRC (eg. acting as a simulator booth operator or communicator is acceptable if the individual does not select ths training content or provide direct or indirect feedback. Furthermore, I am aware of the physical security measures and requirements (as documented in the facility ticensees procedures) and understand that violation of the conditions of this agreement may resçilt in cancellation of the examinations and/or an enforcement action against me or the facility licensee. I will immediately report to facility managemenl or the NRC chief examiner any indications or suggestions that examination security may have been compromised. 2. To the best of my knowledge, I did not divulge to any unauthorized persons any information concerning the NRC licensing examinations administered during the week(s) of From the date that I entered into this security agreement until the completion of examination administration, I did not instruct, evaluate, or provide performance feedback to those applicants who were administered these licensing examinations, except as specifically noted below and authorized by the NRC. 0I0 Pre-Examination w

üjjn Security ernent Form ES-2014 F

SIGNATURE (2) J/29/O7 1 kLtJa 14fr1 PRINTED NAME JOB TITLE / RESPONSIBILITY 1 SW 4 )fl: DATE NOTE NIJIEC12 Reviion 9 r ~.~------------~.~------------.~ fI t.-SJ/ Ii! t!7g. ~'3201, --'-l --.----.. Form ES-201<~ 1. . Pre-Examination I acknowledge that I have acquired specialized knowledge about the NRC licensing examinations scheduled for the weeks(s) of ~/if/O? as of the date of my signature. I agree that I will not knowingly divulge any information about these examinations to'any persons who have not been authorized by the NRC (e.g., acting as a simulator booth operator or communicator is acceptable if the individual does not select thra training content or provide direct or indirect feedback. Furthermore, I am aware of the physical security measures and requirements (as documented in the facility licensee's procedures) and understand that violation of the conditions of this agreement may res!,.Jlt in cancellation of the examinations and/or an enforcement action against me or 1he facility licensee. I will immediately report to facility manage'menl or the NRC chief examiner any indications or suggestions that examination security may have been compromised. To the best of my knowledge, I did not divulge to any unauthorized persons any information concerning the NRC licensing examinations administered during the week(s) of . From the date that I entered into this security agreement until the completion of examination administration, I did not instruct, evaluate, or provide performance feedback to those applicants who were administered these licensing examinations, except as specifically noted below and authorized by the NRC. PRI.NTED NAME JOB TITLE I RESPONSIBIUTY ~~ III lA.~f:f1i M0G-:>&.!..lt( ~VU~ _____ -n"--~ .. -.-7--' .. __.'-'-'f'-__ -r-.::.x;.;=a.... 2CY.!q1UJl,ci_ScJ"tttk.l.l...... _*_M tAu.Vl ~""",'~-.::..r-

3.

4,

5.

6.

l,

8.

9

10.

11

12.

13.

14.

\\5. NOTE JAJt. SIGNATURE (2) '2." IJ7 ~1 -~~.. -.... ---... -.. DATE I co (J) N o o -..J CO o (J) -..J ....... o i-' o

C) 2 arninatiSaowyAgr rot Folm BS-201-3 1. Pre-fxamination acknowledge that I have acquired speoraIzed nowtedgc about the NC licensing examinations scheduled for tho weeks(s) f as of the date of my signature. agree that will not krtwingly divulge any information ebdut these examinations to any persons who have riot been authortzed tiy the NRC (eg., acting as a simulator booth operator or communicator is acceptable if the ndMdual does riOt seIet [he 0) training content or provide direct or indireot feedback. Furthermore, I am aware of the phyaicat security measures and requiremnte (as documented in the facility licensee prccedure) and undersiand that violation of the conditions of this agreement may resUlt in cancellation of 0) the examinations andlcr an entorcemant action against me or tha facility licensee, will irnnediately report to factity management or the NRC chief cxaminar any lndtcafions or suggestions that exarninalfori security may have been cemprontlsed. C 2 Pos[Examinadon 0) To [he best f rwj knowledge, I did riot divulge to any unauthorized persons any information concerning the NRC licensing examinations administered during the week(s) of From the date that f entered into this security agreement Until the complefion of examination administration, I did nOt instruct, evaluate, or provide performance feedback to those applicants who were administered these ticensirig examinations, excet as specifically noted below and euthori2ed by the NRC PRItITEDNAME JO8TITLE/RESPONSI8ILIFY SGN,ftir OAT IGE(2l..- OAT NOTE 0) Z. . 297 (a 147 C NUlE-1,t Rjr: p 0)

3 0

lJ) r-V-m I Q) (T) r-I 0 eo (Xl J) .Y. r-< III

r.

0 (f) III C til

l 0-0 rQ 0..

m 0 (\\1 r-0 (D c:

J r")

III c.. If) t'o 'II" (!) I IJ) C'i t"-, 0 (D ttl ~ .:s. .1::., u' till I (\\1\\ Cl 'N, -'~ ~i II U. I!/' r") c.. (I)," (J) 0

1 a

(") C..

0;-,----------'---

{(LSJ/'/!!p1t7(. ES-201 Focm 58.. 201.. 3

- _. __ *** -- **** <. ~ ** -

1.

'£r e-E~lD.!n<iliilll I acknowledge thaI I have acquired specialized ~f1owledge about the NRc licensing examinations schedul~,d for tr.r:) ~eeks(s) 01 J,pjiIP7 as of the date of my sign3ture, I agree that I will not knowingly dillulge any information about these examinations to' any persons who have not been authorized by the NRC (a-9., /lctil'lg as a simulator booth operator or communicator is acceptable if the individual does not sel&ct the training conlent or provide direct or indirect feedback, Furthermore, I am aware of the phyi>ical security mea:;ures and requirements (as documented irllhe facility licensee's procMures} Bf\\d understand that viQlation of the conditions onhls agreement may res~1\\ in cancellation of the examinations and/or an entorcemt'll'lt action against me or the faciHty licen~ee, I will immediately 'report 10 feenity management or the NRC chief examiner any Ind!cations or suggestions that examination security may have been compromised. 2 PQs\\-f;~_aminalion To the best or my knowledge, I did not divulge to any unauthorized persons any information concerning the NRC licensing examinations administered during the week(s) 01 __.. __. __._' From the date Ihat ! enlered inlo this security agreeme:nt Until the completion of examination administration, I did not instruct. evaluate, or provide performance feedback to those applip,ants who were administered these licensing examinations, except as sr>eciflcally noted below and Authori2ed by the NRC

4.

5, 6, 'I, a, 9 10 11

12.

13

14.

1 :l. I co ...... m N o o -.J co o m N m ~ co ...... o.... o

ES-201 Ixaminatlcn Security Agreement Form ES-abi 1. Pre-Fxamlnatlon 1 acknowledge that I have acquired specialized knowledge about the NRC licensing examinations scheduled for the Week(s) of as of the date of my signature. I agree that I will not knowingly divulge any information about these examinations to any persons who have not been authorized by the NRC chief examiner. I understand that I am net to instruct, evaluate, or provide pertomniance feedback to those applicants scheduled to be administered these licensing examinations from this date until completion of examination administration, except as specifically noted below and authorized by the NRC (e.g., acting as a simulator booth operator or communicator is acceptable if the Individual does not select the training content or provide direct or indirect feedback). Furtheimore. I am aware of the physical security measures and requirements (as documented in the facility licensees procedures) and understand that violation of the conditions of this agreement may result in caricellatkn of the examinations andlor an enforcement action against me or the facility licensee. I will immediately report to facility management or the NRC chief examiner any Indications or o suggestions ihat examination security may have been compromised, 2. !2a-ExaminatIon To the best of my knowledge, I did not divulge to any unauthorized persons any information concerning the NRC licensing examinations administered during the week(s) of . From the datethat I entered into this security agreement until the completIon of examination administration, I did not instruct, evaluate, or provide performance feedback to those applicants Who were administered these licensing examinations, except as specifically noted below and authorized by the NRC. PRINTED NAME JOB TITLE I RESPONSIBILITY SIG TURE (1 DATE SIGNATURE (2) DATE NOTE NOTES: ES-201, Page 26. of 27 ES*201 examination Security Agreement Form ESwZ01-3

1.

Pre-examination I acknowledge that I have acquired specialized knowledge about Ihe NRC licensing examinations sCheduled for the week(s) of as of the date of my signature. I agree that I will nol knowingly divulge any information about these examinations to any persons who have not been authorized by the NRC chief examiner. I understand that I am not to instruct, evaluate, or provide performance feedback to those applicants scheduled to be administered these licenSing examinations from this date until completion of examination administration, except as specifically noted below and authorized by the NRC (e.g., acting as a simulator booth operator or communicator is acceptable if the individual does not select the training content or provide direct or indirect feedback). Furthermore, I am aware of the physical security measures and requirements (as documented in the faciHty licensee's procedures) and understand that violation of the conditions or this agreement may result tn cancellation of the examinations andlor an enforcement action against me or the facility licensee. I Will immediately report to facflity management or the NRC chief examiner any indications or suggestions that examfnalion security may have been cOlTlpromised.

2.

Post-Examination To the besl of my knowledge, I did not divulge to any unauthorized person/; allY informatlon concerning the NRC licensing examinations administered during the weel<{s) of. . From the dafe*that I entered into this security agreement until the completion of examination administration, I oid not instruct, evaluate, or provide performance feedback to those applicants who were administered these licensing examinations, except as specifically noted below and Bulhori'!ed by the NRC. I PRINTED NAME. JOBTITlE/~S~ONSIBILITY Q

~IG

~TURE! ~1T,~/. SIGNATURE(2) DAT~rOTE

1. v 6Vri1tz K L~yl 6xwn; ~bl??~r-

.....,T~L,~~~_._:.....c..r.~-\\---___ :t.~7 )ie ~,+(.tukJr-~~

2. ________ ___________

3. ___________

~

4. ____________________________________________________________ _

5. ____________________________ _

~

6. _____________________________________________________________ _

7. _______

~

8. ______________________________________________________ __

9. ________________________________ _

10.. ____________________________ _

11. ______________. _______________________________ _

12.. __________________________________________________ __

13. ____________________________ _

14. ___________________. _________ _

15. _____________

~ NOTES: ES-201, Page 26 of 27

, ~

Q:) 0') N o o --J Q:) o 0') N 0') ~ (0 ....... o ....... o

ci ES..20 I Exilnatton Se*uritv Arireernent Form Ea-2014 0 cc. C) a) CD C) C) CV I V eckno4de that I have acqvirod epecia zed)uio 4ada Wul the NRC eeOsin examinations scheduled fr the week(s) of

V as oltho date ci my ecnetue. I agree (hail will not k nly dNijle any intormation about theee examinations to any persons Who have not bn authonzod V by the NC cIet examhter. I understand that (am not to instruct. evaluate, or provide perfarmanco Iaedback to those applicants echadulad to a admirvstred these ItcensIn aamInefions from thia date unI completion of e)camlnaroa adminietralion, except as spectflealty noted betow and authorled by the NRC (,g., soling es a simulator booth opOrale( or commurc.aioc is scoeplable ii the Individual does not select tht frlrumg content or provide dicct or indirect emJback). Furthermore, I am aare t the physical saeuritt meesures and requirements (as documented in the fsillty fconseou procodure) and undersiend that vlQIatiQn ot the cunditlarts ot this agreement may result in cnceflaliun of the axamlnetlons andlor en enforcement adirrn egGinsi mo or the lacilily Iieneee, I will Immediately rsrpod to tcfllty marcayemerit or the NRC chief xemlner any Indications o suggestions that examinetton aacuHty may hare been oompromised. 2, PgjiaUo C) C) C) .IV 0) C) C cm VP C) 0 To Ihe best at my I.iIowIeJria, I did not divulge to any unaufhorlzCd per3orr any rrriMton CO icernirig the NRC cangln examircatiortir adminieterec during the wc.ek(5) of _VV V Front the dekthat 1 entered Into this aeriuriry nreeRent tmbl th comp1etn of.xamI,rtlmi administration, I rild pOt Instruct. cySlrjntn. ci provide performance faedhack lo ttrou upplicarile Who wore odsniniarmed these hcen&ng exmnlnaUona, except s specifcaUy noted below snd authorized by (ho NRC. PRINTED NAME JO TITLE 1 RESPCNS(8lLTY Jii SIR TURE (1 9. 10, 12 2.. V 3. VVVV 4. ti. VVV_VVVVVV_ 6______________ V V_____ V V 7._.

DATE ShNATURE (2) It NCiTt h 1V t. NOTES: 0 -J I 0. to C.. CO C i-ri I0 ci 0 ES-201, Psge 2f$ cr127 'i."., ~ 1

n.

ci I

i CD C) 0 "t d> a:J ('") ~) 8 0;> ~ D 1].. a 0

J

J u)

~ 9! ~ ro -, u (U 0 C) ,"0 r** C) c> c:.) co 1'-. ~:J Ii t.t) Z 't.,~ c: -c' . _____ ExamInation !!~~urlt>, A..tlI!.:..:re::;:eo:;m::.:e::!riJ:.f ________ -:--,~.-.",_--"F:..:o~fC!.!mc!.!::El3-2Q1-3. i, t!II-I!)(l!.mlrHillp.n I ack!'.{)wted\\ju that I have acquired specializetl knolllledgB.. p(/l.Il the NRC r!cMsing Ilx2minaflons scheduled fQr the week(s) or ilo Qf tho ~alc of my si9n~tU(e. I agree Ulall will not knowingly divulge any information about ihest} examinations 10 any persons Who halll! not been authorizod by the NRC chief e;{amifl9r. I understand fhat I am not to inRtrucf, ~lIelualf), Of ptovlde f)8rformanoo /Qedhack to tOose applicants 3chedul<td 10 I;;fiI admiliist<\\led these licensln\\l Elx.mlnlltions from thl$ dete llnlH COInpfetion of examination admini3traUon. excepl as spllcflieaUy oatec! b~tow \\lnQ authorized bv the NRC {o,g" acting as n slmllt;;o!of benln cperator or communic;;alOl is acceplable it tlw Individual does not select tM traIning content or provide diCed or indirect feetlbacll). l'urthlllmOTo, \\ am e;;llre of the physical sat.urity meUUres and requiremants (as docllmenMd in thl'l facility licenseo's pro.:-.edure,) 8l'ld undersllilnd that vIQlation 01 Ihe ~\\lntll\\lOns 01 this agreement may result in cllm;elilltiuo of lila examinations andlor 811 enroreernenl adic," agaInst me 0( the iaciUty li,en6Ile. r Wilt Immediatelv report to t/lCnlly management <>[ the NRC chief examiner any Indications Of Guggeslions llUIl examination Mcurily may ha~e bElen cornpromis!!d, 2, f'~.i!.mI1liillIm To tho be~t of my knQwI~1.Ig8.1 did not divulge to any uitauthorll<'!d p"r30n~ any information col,,,,,,,,ing lh~ NRC ~cenBln9 examiMtions 9ctmini~tNed during the week(s) of ___.. _ .. ' From ttl\\! dille. thai j enftlred Into this snnullry n!lrl!el\\'t~nt ur"lill the completion of 9;o(arnina!hm lidmlni!l.lration. I !:lid not Instruct evaluol~, 01 rNlvide pouforma~ feedhack 10 Iho&" appllcr.mls who w<lra odminialeroo th~~t> ffcen~in9 eXflmina!lons, except <IS specincaUy noled below and... ulhQri~ed by Ihl! NRC. PRtNTEDNAME JOBTITlE/RESPONSI61LnY G.. /~?':!~7

~;,u S'G=;}i~6oTt

~: _.-,,_tmt_t2 __ L_. 0_b~l_{)C_f:#I:_i_&_'6_!~_-- ... _.!.~~_....::;rJi-'_~",,-,. __ flL'ft!-l ........ _,.LL~c-'< ... r-'o:-____ ~_12 i~2~- ~f;ft/ff(

3.

~-. J,. _________...... ___....... __..

5. _____ _

6.

7. _____ --- _______.......... __. _______________ _

8.* ____ .. __.. _._.. ___ _ --- ~-~--.. -........... _-------

9.

~ -.. -~-.--~----.-.-... -..-.... -... --- 10, _____. _____________ _ 11._... _._._. ______ _.-----_._------.

12. __

1.1. 1-:' - ... ~

15. ______

._~ ___. __ ~ =--==--_. _......... __. __ ~ __._... _._.. __. __. __._... _____._. ___..... __._._. _____.. __ ~ __________.. _,- NOTES: [S*201. Page 260/ '>-.7 I (Xl m N o o -.J (Xl o m N m ~ i-' o o i-' o

ES-201 Examination Security Agreement Form ES-201-3 L1AAM1/ iC &c

,fl.GI I acknowledge that I have acquired specialized knowledge about the NRC licensing examinations scheduled for the week(s) of 1- &

as of the date of my signature. I agree that I will not knowingly divulge any information about these examinations to any persons who have not been authorized by the NRC chief examiner. I understand that I am not to instruct, evaluate, or provide performance feedback to those applicants scheduled to be administered these licensing examinations from this date until completion of examination administration, except as specifically noted below and authorized by the NRC (e.g., acting as a simulator booth operator or communicator is acceptable if the individual does not select the training content or provide direct or indirect feedback). Furthermore, I am aware of the physical security measures and requirements (as documented in the facility licensees procedures) and understand that violation of the conditions of this agreement may result in cancellation of the examinations and/or an enforcement action against me or the facility licensee. I will immediately report to facility management or the NRC chief examiner any indications or suggestions that examination security may have been compromised. 2. Post-Examination To the best of my knowledge, I did not divulge to any unauthorized persons any information concerning the NRC licensing examinations administered during the week(s) of From the date that I entered into this security agreement until the completion of examination administration, I did not instruct, evaluate, or provide performance feedback to those applipants who were administered these licensing examinations, except as specifically noted below and authorized by the NRC. PRINTED NAME 1 4aicIL 2b4p 3 L%,- 4 5. 6. 9. 1 Ji_ 11 12. 14. 15. NOTES: JOB TITLE I RESPONSIBILITY ,Wc /.iT /7/ CiZ.$. L 2 ° DATE SlGNATURE() DATE NOTE Jf/J ///7 btsT41 /eA cf4/e7. 1. Pre-Examination SIGNATURE (1) cci hr:2 ES-201, Page 26 of 27 ES-201 Examination Security Agreement Form ES-201-3

1.

Pre-Examination I acknowledge that I have acquired specialized knowledge about the NRC licensing examinatior.s scheduled for the week(s) of ~/.1:-A:)(/C ~s of th~ date of my signature. I agree that I willl10t knowingly divulge any information about these examinations to any persons who have not b~en authorized by the NRC chief examiner. I understand that I am not to instruct, evaluate, or provide performance feedback to those applicants scheduled to be administered these licensing examinations from this date until completion of examination administration, except as specifically noted below and authorized by the NRC (e.g., acting as a simulator booth operator or communicator is acceptable if the individual does not select the training content or provide direct or indirect feedback). Furthermore, I am aware of the physical security measures and requirements (as documented in the facility licensee's procedures) and understand that violation of the conditions of this agreement may result in cancellation of the examinations and/or an enforcement action against me or the facility licensee. I will immediately report to facility management or the NRC chief examiner any indications or suggestions that examination security may have been compromised..'

2.

Post~Examination To the best of my knowledge, I did not divulge to any unauthorized persons any information concerning the NRC licensing examinations administered during the week(s) of . From the date that I entered into this security agreement until the completion of examination administration, I did not instruct, evaluate, or provide performance feedback to those appli~ants who were administered these licensing examinations, except as specifically noted below and authorized by the NRC. PRINTED NAME JOB TITLE / RESPONSIBILITY SIGNATURE (1) DATE DATE NOTE 1. :Q~A81\\l-~<!(~l--- fiMf1~~ ____ ~_______________ __0- -r ~iT.--~--tt-1? - ' -J{f!:~~---- t(-2~~~p~.!J__________ __~g?~Ep!!Jl.t4JlJ~.s__________ ..L.btliJ-~~- ~~({}. __ _________ ~ff.k..z-__

3.

~*ot,A Le_t>-r...J? A./vc: /1V.f / /// ,[ 7 ~ C'/V} ~:=~~~~jI~~======~~~~~==;;===~~~====---- - --~ = -~====~~~-=--===----===-======~;~-=--=== 6 --r~aJ~~£L~~IJ;:J-~-- ---¥~iJ6-------~jl!kZ--;;c.tr:::-- ----:--- - ---------~-7t/!. -:-----r. --:----(j---- t-l.£ ~f.-ft2- . _-I~J:f-------d~----- ______ -: ____ 5l::rt.5~;h------ --- ---,---- ~L:.zj!~- ----~-- -{j -r;-fJ./--

7. -A~Lm~---- -~---3:-----~---------- -

~ &;2 -----Ar-A -J7h------ --:7.- ;;r.---

~. =it~~~~.;;:.i===e&'t::--=~======--=_ ----~==~ 3:~==~~Z ____ ~~= ~~~~ ~ ~*~~~~TI~;-o~Jl£.----~~-E--~-~q----------- -- -:::.-~ ---

~.:-:--l :---

o-ac.. . -- (p-t~r-~7- "_~\\1~~n.a_1!.1.At:lD- ---J:l.e-'--------------------- - ~- --~--- iP---- -------- -~-- --dJ~ ~.:L __ 12._____________________ _____________________________ ___________________________ ______ ____________________ _ ________ _ 13 "_____________________ _____________________________ ___________________________ ______ ____________________ _ ________ _ 14._____________________ _____________________________ ___________________________ ______ ____________________ _ ________ _ 15._____________________ _____________________________ ___________________________ ______ ____________________ _ ________ _ NOTES: ES-201, Page 26 of 27

1. Pre-Examination \\J (.. 5 I acknowledge that I have acquired specialized knowledge about the NRC licensing examinatics scheduled for the week(s) of as of the date of my signature. I agree that I will not knowingly divulge any information about these examinations to any persons who have nol been authorized by the NRC chief examiner. I understand that I am not to instruct, evaluate, or provide performance feedback to those applicants scheduled to be administered these licensing examinations from this date until completion of examination administration, except as specifically noted below and authorized by the NRC (e.g., acting as a simulator booth operator or communicator is acceptable if the individual does not select the training content or provide direct or indirect feedback). Furthermore, I am aware of the physical security measures and requirements (as documented in the facility licensees procedures) and understand that violation of the conditions of this agreement may result in cancellation of the examinations and/or an enforcement action against me or the facility licensee. I will immediately report to facility management or the NRC chief examiner any indications or suggestions that examination security may have been compromised. 2. Post-Examination To the best of my knowledge, I did not divulge to any unauthorized persons any information concerning the NRC licensing examinations administered during the week(s) of From the date that I entered into this security agreement until the completion of examination administratirn, I did not instruct, evaluate, or provide performance feedback to those applicants who were administered these licensing examinations, except as specifically noted below and authorized by the NRC. PRINTED NAME

JitsL: 3...S_JL]; 4. t4.

P+/-.L_ 5. 8. 4_sk 10 ii 12. rr4qAvz.Q / 13.fpz 4 iIJ 14 1 NOTES LLLL A6,.1._ ,o --c--u1,- i?c) SIGNATURE (1) \\c ç L.i ---r-c?_F----- ES-201 Examination Security Agreement Form ES-201-3 b,I/o1 JOB TITLE) RESPONSIBILITY f--.,-- DATE SIGNATURE (2) DATE NOTE LL!i7 --4 47

24Z L j- - 2.3 -o7 2-3O-O 5(c f/z9,.7 ES-201, Page 26 of 27 ES-201 Examination Security Agreemen~ Form ES-201-3

1.

Pre-Examination V. L ~.s v~ 'lV\\.4. .I J ,., 'I \\)1..r I acknowledge that I have acquired specialized knowledge about the NRC licensing examinatic:1s scheduled for the week(s) of Cllllf07 as of th~ elate of my signature. I agree that I will not knowingly divulge any information about these examinations to any persons who have'l1o been authorized by the NRC chief examiner. I understand that I am not to instruct, evaluate, or provide performance feedback to those applicants scheduled to be administered these licensir.g examinations from this date until completion of examination administration, except as specifically noted below and authorized by the NRC (e.g., acting as a simulator booth operator or communicator is acceptable if the individual does not seleCt the training content or provide direct or indirect feedback). Furthermore, I am aware of the physical security measures and requirements (as documented in the facility licensee's procedures) and understand that violation of the conditions of this agreement may result in cancellation of the examinations and/or an enforcement action against me or the facility licensee. I will immediately rep~rt to {acility management or the NRC chief examiner any indications or suggestions that examination security may have been compromised.

2.

Post-Examination To the best of my knowledge, I did not divulge to any unauthorized persons any information concerning the NRC licensing examinations administered during the week(s) of . From the date that I entered into this security agreement until the completion of examination administratic'll, I did not , instruct, evaluate, or provide performance feedback to those applicants who were administered these licensing examinations, except as spl:Jcifically noted below and authorized by the NRC. ES-201, Page 26 of 27

ES-201 Examination Security Agreement Form ES2O1-3 1. Pre-Examination acknowledge that I have acquired specialized knowledge about the NRC licensing examinations scheduled for the week(s) of as of the date of my signature. I agree that I will not knowingly divulge any information about these examinations to any persops who have not been authorized by the NRC chief examiner. I understand that I am not to instruct, evaluate, or provide performance feedback to those applicants scheduled to be administered these licensing examinations from this date until completion of examination administration, except as specifically noted below and authorized by the NRC (e.g., acting as a simulator booth operator or communicator is acceptable if the individual does not select the training content or provide direct or indirect feedback). Furthermore, I am aware of the physical security measures and requirements (as documented in the facility licensees procedures) and understand that violation of the conditions of this agreement may result in cancellation of the examinations and/or an enforcement action against me or the facility licensee. I will immediately report to facility management or the NRC chief examiner any indications or suggestions that examination security may have been compromised. 2. Post-Examination To the best of my knowledge, I did not divulge to any unauthorized persons any information concerning the NRC licensing examinations administered during the week(s) of From the date that I entered into this security agreement until the completion of examination administration, I did not instruct, evaluate, O[ provide performance feedback to those applicants who were administered these licensing examinations, except as specifically noted below and authorized by the NRC. 7. 8. 10.. 11 13. 14. 15. NOTES: PRINTED NAME JOB TITLE I RESPONSIBILITY C) (1) 6. 9. DATE SIGNATURE (2) DATE NOTE 3/Q7 -7 12. 1 _f( ES-201, Page 26 of 27 ES-201 Examination Security Agreement Form ES.. 201-3

1.

Pre-Examination I acknowledge that I have acquired specialized knowledge about the NRC licensing examinations scheduled for the week(s) of as of the date of my signature. I agree that I will not knowingly divulge any information about these examinations to any persO\\1s who have not been authoriz~d by the NRC chief examiner. I understand that I am not to instruct, evaluate, or provide performance feedback to those applicants scheduled to be administered these licensing examinations from this date until completion of examination administration, except as specifically noted below and authorized by the NRC (e.g., acting as a simulator booth operator or communicator is acceptable if the individual does not select the training content or provide direct or indirect feedback). Furthermore, I am aware of the physical security measures and requirements (as documented in the facility licensee's procedures) and understand that violation of the conditions of this agreement may result in cancellation of the examinations and/or an enforcement action against me or the facility licensee. I will immediately report to fac!lity management or the NRC chief examiner any Indications or suggestions that examination security may have been compromised.

2.

Post-Examination To the best of my knowledge, I did not divulge to any unauthorized persons any information concerning the NRC licensing examinations administered during the week(s) of . From the date that I entered into this security agreement until the completion of examination administration, I did not instruct, evaluate, O[ provide performance feedback to those applicants who were administered these licensing examinations, except as specifically noted below and authorized by the NRC.

9. _____________________ _ _______________________________________________________ _________ _

10"_____________________ _ _______________________________________________________________ _ 11._____________________ _ _______________________________________________________________ _

12. __ "___________________ _ ____ ~ __________________________________________________________ _

1 3 "_____________________ _ ____________________________________________________..:. __________ _ 14 "_____________________ _ __________________________________________________ --___________ _ 15._____________________ _ _______________________. ___________ ---------------..,.---- __.____ ____________________ _ _______ _ NOTES: ES-201, Page 26 of 27

t. _xanecur!eement 1 f.xrpinatlan a anoledge that have aoquked specialized knowledgo about the NRC licensing eamineltons scheduled for the waek() of date ot my signature. agree that I wilt not lnicertrtgly divulge any Information ubout these examinations to any persors wio haOuot.j y the NRC thier examiner. 1 ufld Stand that an, not to truct. evaluate, or provIde performance feedback to those appIlcant Scheduled to be administered these licensing examinations from this data until completion of eamlnaUon administratlort. except as apedlicalty noted below end authorized by the NRC (e.g., actInU as a simulator bolh operator or c rvnunlcator Is acceptable If the IndMdual dOas ric4 5&ul the training content or provide direct or indirect faadback. Furthermore, Lam aware ol the physical security measures and menl.s (as documented In the facility 0 licensees procedures and understarid that violation of the coixlIons 0? (his aqreemnl may result In canceletlors of the exemtnattorms and/Or err enforcement action against me or the facIlity licensee. I wilt immediately report to facility management or the NRC thief examiner arty irdlcaUoris or suggestions that examination security may have been compromised. 2. on w To the best of my trrrowiedge. I did not divulge to any unauthorized persons arty irilorrnetion concernlrrg the NRC licensing a Inatlons edrrijntstered C. dtning the week(s) at __. From the dale Thai entered into this security agreement Until the completion of examination admnlnjraUon I did 1301 instruct, evaluate ot. prcwlde frellormance feedback to those applicants who were administered theae licensing exarolnalions, except as specifIcally noted below and authorized by the NRC, JOB TITLE I RESPONSIBILITY SlGNAT (1) DATE StGNATURE <2) DATE NOTE OU 9-.- I L-1) -I Lit 1) Litrj fu U) -4m C ri 03 Cu ri In 03 In In (I) uJ 0x IL) z 4 I-. 00 03 CO 0 C00ra 03 -l

cIt,

zzzzz2zzzz PRINTED NAME 3 cs-

2. Uli

-zi 3 (V!t)Pi 4.4k S 6 JO_ 6. V

11 t d 14._______ 1 5..._.-...._ NOTES: 0 Ca ES-201, Page 26of 27 I~ IS) M rl If) 11 ~} f"'J fU \\.0 rl IT! o f-f1i ~ fU "1" fV) If) OJ ~ <I' o o... N 1,'t ,1'1 "'1 e ES*201 ExamInation Security A.greement foOll Es..201-3

1.

f're*Exl!!J1inatlon I acknowledge Ihat \\ have acquired specialized l\\r~wled~ about the NRC IIC<l\\1Slng e)(aminQtions schedulfH;! fur the weel<<s) of ____ as-of Ih~- dale 01 my signature. I agree Iha\\ I !Mil not 1<.nowlng\\y d"tlrutge any Inlorme\\ion about lhese Qx:!mlnatlons to any ~rsOflS IiWho hav1!I Mt been auttlorlled by 1M NRC wier examiner. t undersla~d thaI I am not to Insiruc\\, evaluate, or provide performance feedback 10 ihooe BppRcants &choouled 10 be administered Ihese licensing examirlatlons from this data until C()mplaUon of etamlnation administration. except as specifically noted below end author\\zed hy the NRC (e,g., acting ~ a simulator boolh operator or CIJIl1IT\\un\\(;a\\or Is a~ptable" lhlllndMd\\Jal does not select the trelnlng content or provide direct or intllrect fesdbadl). Furthermore. I am awaJe althe ph~lc.!I\\ $eCurHy mees\\,l!'e$ and I'8quiremeo15 tM dOGi/mented In the facility licensee's procedures) and understand \\hal violation of lhe conditions 01 this agreEmanl may result In canC&l8llon of the examlnattons and/or lln enlarcement acllon against m~ or !he faclnty Ucen$e~_ twill imme<lla\\ety report to facility managemel'l\\ or \\he NRC chief Bxamlner any indlcaUol\\s or suggestions \\flat e)(amlnation security may have been compromised.

2.

Post..f:)(amlnlltlon 10 the ces! or my I<nowledge. I did not divulge 10 any unauthoriz.ad penianll MY infOtmBlion concernIng the NRC bnlling axal1llnellon$ adrninlsten!d during the week(s) 01 . From 1M dale thai I entered into this ~eC\\lrity agreement unlillhc comp\\etlon ofexamlna1lon aclmlnistratlOll.t did not instruct evaluate, Ot provide j)eriolmance feedback to those applicants who \\\\Ie~ administered thelle ncensing examlnatlo/ls, m<cepl as specifically noled billow BoO authorize<! by the NRC, PRINTED NAME JOB TITLE I RESPONSIBILITY DATE SIGNATURE. (2) PATE NOTE

1z~~

~!:.0"4:d.jl~!L:- - ~~~~~~ ~,"",-? J.~~i;. ~-zi;-: :r. ~'!-~ ~r,'41'fJ~.Ltf),J'-!:!.!J.....iIt::tt!.-_ -'1;;:.--;2..------- -__ -'-- 4.~ (vr-:!:!'!:!..____ V-------------- --y-::r,:-, -----_______ _ 5 L~c~"'*lli __ ________________ _ _____ ~~~---,--~ 6:'~_\\~ Lp..J:;"l1!.a\\J:t_-tf':X-!c.'Y!>-J..E..v~f.b____ __. __ *~,::.l4-0 ~ ..Jd!.t;:..u..L1

7. _________________.--___________ ___________

8, ____________________ ~._____ ___

9. "'-___________________________ _

10. ___ - _____________________________________________

11. ______ ~----- _________________________ '--___

~ 12 _________________________________________ ~_.,---____. __ 13,____________ _____ 14, ___ ---_________________. _______________________ ' 15 _______________________________________________ ~--- __. __________ _ NOTES: ES-201. Page 26 of 27

w V (L14M6 ES-201 Examination Security ement Form ES-201-3 1. Pre-Examination I acknowledge that I have acquired specialized knowledge about the NRC licensing examinations scheduled for the weeks(s) of as of the date of my signature. I agree that I will not knowingly divulge any information about these examinations to any persons who have not been authorized by the NRC (e.g., acting as a simulator booth operator or communicator is acceptable if the individual does not select the training content or provide direct or indirect feedback. Furthermore, I am aware of the physical security measures and requirements (as documented in the facility licensees procedures) and understand that violation of the conditions of this agreement may resçilt in cancellation of the examinations and/or an enforcement action against me or the facility licensee. I will immediately report to facility management or the NRC chief examiner any indications or suggestions that examination security may have been compromised. 2, Post-Examination To the best of my knowledge I did not divulge to any unauthorized persons any information concerning the NRC licensing examinations administered during the week(s) of From the date that I entered into this security agreement until the completion of examination administration, I did not instruct, evaluate, or provide performance feedback to those applicants who were administered these licensIng examinations, except as specifically noted below and authorized by the NRC. PRINTED NAME JOE TITLE / RESPONSIBILITh SGNy1 (1) DAT SIGNATURE (2) DATE NOTE 1. is&.&ar .tøiaJ J/2/t7 Se *zMac 4 L/ LJL NUREG-1C2 I. Revision 9 .~.~------------~.~------------~.

1.

. Pre-Examination I acknowledge that I have acquired specialized knowledge about the NRC licensing examinations scheduled for the weeks(s) of ~/'fI07 as of the date of my signature. I agree that I will not knowingly divulge any information about these examinations to*any persons who have not been authorized by the NRC (e.g., acting as a simulator booth operator or communicator is acceptable if the individual does not select the training content or provide direct or indirect feedback. Furthermore, I am aware of the physical security measures arid requirements (as documented in the facility licensee's procedures) and understand that violation of the conditions of this agreement may resl,llt in cancellation of the examinations and/or an enforcement action against me or the facility licensee. I will immediately report to facility management or the NRC chief examiner any indications or suggestions that examination security may have been compromised.

2.

Post-Examination To the best of my knowledge, I did not divulge to any unauthorized persons any information concerning the NRC licensing examinations administered during the week(s) of . From the date that I entered into this security agreement Until the completion of examination administration, I did not instruct. evaluate, or provide performance feedback to those applicants who were administered these licensing examinations, except as specifically noted below and authorized by the NRC. PRINTED NAME JOB TITLE t RESPONSIBILITY ~S GN (li 1~~~H ~fr.)AVL!( ~VU>f'lC _____ 2cJ'Acqlttlli:~LSCJ'\\ilkJf...... -_. Ad I!lu.II1 ~~~~~:....-

3.

4.

5.

6.

7.

8.

9. ---.---

10. ____.~ __

11. _____ _

12.

13.

14.

15.

JA~ SIGNATURE (2) DATE I a/~{ -~~_= ~

t;j/f;~

NOTE

C? C 0 L C) CrC ci z. 0. 0 cC CC) C?0 C0 0 C CC) 0 VC5J41M6. ES-201 xarninationSecunlyAreement ForrnES-2O1.3 1. Pre-Exaniination ckncwledge that I have acquired specialized nowtedge about the NRC licensing examinations scheduled for the weeks(s) of_/Z. as of the date of my signature. agree that I will not knowingly divulge any information about these examintions to any persons who have not been authorized by the NRC (e.g. acting as a simulator booth operator or communicator is acceptable if the individual does not select the training content or provide direct or indirect feedback, Furthermore, I am aware of the physical security measures and requiremnts (as documented ii the facility licensees procedures) arid understand that violatIon of the conditions of this agreement may rescilt ii? cancellation of the examinations andlor an enforcement action against me or the facility licensee. I will immediately report to facitity management or the NRC chief examiner any IndIcations or suggestions that examinalion security may have been compromised. 2 P-E To the best of my knowledge I did not divulge to any unauthorized persons any information concerning the NRC licensing examinations administered during the week(s) of From the date that I entered into this security agreement until the completion of examination administration, I did not instruct, evaluate, or provide performance feedback to those applicants who were administered these licensing examinations, except as specifically noted below and authori7ed by the NRC. NOTE PRINTED NAME JOB TITLE / RESPONSIBILItY SLGMt, lii

1. Jâ 1

H 4&-4 EzJJ: 0 cr-C0 (-Ci 0 C? C DAT lGNfl7tE(2L-DAT i/29/O7 ______ØefiIL_ NIJI3. 12 i Rciin 9 If) r- "<t-m I m ('l') r-I 0 <D Sl"-l::*t:....J.J;1L~*:k:-=/~I-p~~_~P~/rtL ~ tdf~ I'~

2. __________________________________________ ~
__________ ~- ~
3. _______________
~ _________________ _
4. _________________________________ _

5. ________________________________________________________ __

6. __________________________________ _

7. ____________..... ___________
~
8.

9. _______________________________________________________ __

10. _______________________________ _
11., ______________________________________________________ _ 12.. ___________________________________ ~ ___________________ _ 13.. _______ 14.~ ___________________________ _
15. _________________________________________________..... ______ __
NOTES: ES-201, Page 26 of 27
1. acknowledge that I have acquired spaciatized knowledge Wut the NRC licensing examinations scheduled for the weak(s) of.
as of the datc of coy signatuce. I agree that I will not knowingly dlvuIe any intormation about these exilmlrrat(ons to any pereons Who have not been authorized by the NRC chia examiner. I understand that I am not to instruct, avaluala, or povide performance fosdbek In thcis applicants cheduI,d Ic, tie administred these licensing examinations from this date until coniptetion of examln&on adminiatrailon, except as specilically noted below and authorl2edby the NRC (eg., acting as a simulator booth oporolor or comniurlicelor is acceptable it the Individual does not select ti-ie lreinig content or provide direct or indirect feedbac1). Furthermore, I am are of the physical saturity measuns and requirernanls (as documented in thA Iscility Iicasoo procedures) end understand that viQiatign of the conditionS of this agreemient may result In c ceilation of the awaminations artd!or en onforcement adion sginst coo or the facility licensee, twill Immediately rnpoil to friellity mnsyement or the NIRC chief examiner any Indications or suggestions that examination curity may have been compromised 2. To the hI of my iwlrJ, I did not divulge to any unauthorized parsons any nform&ion concerning the NR licensing examinations administered during the week(s) of _...._. From the nJatethat S entered Into this snouriry flreetent unhi the complefion cf.xamlnellon admInistration, I (lid not Instruct, evalunto, or provide performance feedhacir to those appliconite who were edministerod theso fleensing eeminallans, except as specifically noted below and avthoried by the NRC. ES.2O1 v 5 ExamIn;tlo
otøl-3 >0 -J I) CD E (0 -) (0 aD CD CD cC D PRINTED NAME JOB TITLE 1 RESPONSIBILITY ,( L4yd
46/Ci
&IG TIJRE (I
-I,-- I O. 11. 12. DATE SINATURE (Z) TE NOTE 4.
5._ 6.
7. 8.
9.
13 14. 0 I C, C 1. NOTES: ES-201, Page 26 of 27 ci .~
0.
I 1 OJ <::) <::) c>> CD C'? C'? 8 I as 'Q" OJ ~ co '0 ~ a 0
J

=i (j)
<D E <1l
0.
<) <1l ~ ~ eo 0 <::) ~ I"- <::) Ii OJ C
J -,
<t."1 ES-201 Ex~ml"at!on se<:uraY..!-lta:..:re:::ec:...:m.:.::e;.:.r\\:;.t _________ .,-~.:...Fo::.r:.:.m~es..::::...;2::::0:..:1:...=..3
1.
Era.examln.a!lon I aCKnowledgE) that I have acquired specialized knowledge ;'\\)(lulthe NRC licensing eXi!minations scheduled for the week(s) 01 liO of the <laic of my signature. I agree Ihat I will not knowinglyulvulge any intormation about these examinations \\0 any pe~ons Viho hS\\Il! nol be(ln authorized by the NRC chief examiner. I understand that t am not to instruct. evaluate. or provide perform an co le~dback lo those appllcanls ~cheduhtd 10 l;ia . adminis!<!Jred thest! Iicenslnl1 9l(Olmlmilions from this dete unlil comphHion of exarnlnalion admini3tratiof'l, except as specHicaUy notert below and authoriZed by the NRC (&.g., acllng as £I simulator boolh operator or col'l1ll'Jul\\it:lIlor is acceplable il the Individual does not select the traIning conlent Of provide direct or indirecl feedbacll). Furttlltlmore, 1 am lNIarll of the physical sar.urity n'I~asures and requirements (as c!ocumenMd in thll facility licenseo's prOGedure,) I!Ind undertl",nd that vIolation 01 Ihe concillon~ of this agreell1enl m!!y result in c!lIwellation of the el(3minallons and/or an enforcement adion Ilgalns\\ Ina Of the facill(y 'i~lIn5ee, r wtlllmmediately repon to mellity IT1Magemellt or the NRC chief o::xamlnur any Indications Of suggestions that exnmlMUOn MCurity may have been <:ompromislW,
2.
Post-examlnaUon To the best ot my knowllidge, I did nof divulge to any unauthorized pef30r'lS any information collcerning the NRC licensing examinations eClminiMered durin 9 the wtlek(s) of . From til", date-that I entered Inlo this se~urlry lI!lr!!em~nt until the completion Qf ~xamlna.lIol1 ru:imlni:l.tration, I (lid not 111l1truct. cvetuntr., or ~ro\\(ide performance leedb9ck 10 Iho&9 applJcants who wero adminiatered the~1l tieen:sing ex.aminations, oxcept liS GPeCiflc,l1ly noted below and aulhori.:ed by the NRc. PRINTED NAME: JOB TITLE I RESPONSIBILI1Y C.' )~IG_~T_U.f-,RE_(_1~ __ ¥tT/~Ao,"'~. SIGNATUR?E (;:~ 0~. ;l¢7
1. --.JWr112,{ [j6~l {~t:¥n/ [)eyt-!r@r-T~~~
7, L_~1t
2. ______ --'-___________ _

3. ________________________
~ ~-----~-~-- 5,
6.

7.

8.

9.

10.

11.
---~---- -.---
12.

~--

13

~----

14.

15.
NOTES: ES*201, Page 26 of 27
ES-301 Administrative Topics Outline Form ES-301-1 Facility: VC Summer Date of Examination: 6/4/2007 Examination Level (circle one) RO / SRO Operating Test Number NRC Administrative Topic Type Describe activity to be performed (see Note) Code* 2.1.7 Ability to evaluate plant performance and make Conduct of Operations operational judgments based on operating characteristics, reactor behavior, and instrument M,R interpretation (3.7) Perform a QPTR Calculation for dropped control rod 2.1.25 Ability to obtain and interpret station references and Conduct of Operations material such as graphs, nomographs, and references which contain performance data (2.8) Perform actions for natural circulation cooldown including: N,R Determination of required boron concentration Maximum allowable RCS cooldown rate Maximum allowable RCS temperature for current plant conditions 2.2.13 Knowledge of tagging and clearance procedures Equipment Control N R (3.6) Prepare a manual tagout of a CCW Pump 2.3.2 Knowledge of facility ALARA program (2.5) Radiation Control M, R Determine Worker Exposure Emergency Plan NOTE: All items (5 total are required for SROs. RO applicants require only 4 items unless they are retaking only the administrative topics, when 5 are required. NUREG-1021, Revision 9 ES-301 Administrative Topics Outline Form ES-301-1 Facility: VC Summer Date of Examination: 6/4/2007 Examination Level (circle one): R~/SRO Operating Test Number: NRC Administrative Topic Type Describe activity to be performed (see Note) Code* 2.1.7 Ability to evaluate plant performance and make Conduct of Operations operational judgments based on operating characteristics, reactor behavior, and instrument M,R interpretation (3.7) Perform a QPTR Calculation for dropped control rod 2.1.25 Ability to obtain and interpret station references and Conduct of Operations material such as graphs, nomographs, and references which contain performance data (2.8) Perform actions for natural circulation cooldown including: N,R Determination of required boron concentration Maximum allowable RCS cooldown rate Maximum allowable RCS temperature for current plant conditions 2.2.13 Knowledge of tagging and clearance procedures Equipment Control N,R (3.6) Prepare a manual tagout of a CCW Pump 2.3.2 Knowledge of facility ALARA program (2.5) Radiation Control M,R Determine Worker Exposure Emergency Plan NOTE: All items (5 total are required for SROs. RO applicants require only 4 items unless they are retaking only the administrative topics, when 5 are required. NUREG-1021, Revision 9
ES-3d Administrative Topics Outline Form ES-301-1
Type Codes & Criteria:
(C)ontrol room Class(R)oom (D)irect from bank ( 3 for ROs; for SROs & RD retakes) (N)ew or (M)odified from bank (> 1) (P)revious 2 exams ( 1; randomly selected) (S)im ulator NUREG-1 021, Revision 9 ES-301
Type Codes & Criteria:
NUREG-1 021, Revision 9 Administrative Topics Outline (C)ontrol room Class(R)oom Form ES-301-1 (D)irect from bank (:s; 3 for ROs; :s; for SROs & RO retakes) (N)ew or (M)odified from bank (> 1) (P)revious 2 exams (:s; 1; randomly selected) (S)imulator
ES-301 Administrative Topics Outline Form ES-301-l Admin Task Description Ala The applicants will perform a QPTR calculation that will result in QPTR being outside of requirements. The conditions of this JPM are significantly modified from a bank JPM. AIb The applicants will determine Mode 5 required boron concentration during a natural circulation cooldown, and then also determine maximum allowable cooldown rate for current plant conditions, (No CRDM Fans running) and maximum allowable RCS temperature for the given RCS pressure using curves in EOP-l.3. This is a new JPM. A2 The applicants will prepare a tagout manually without the aid of computers. They will be required to identify critical isolation boundaries as well as sequence of tag placement for a Component Cooling Water Pump. This JPM is new A3 Given a task to perform in the Radiological Controlled Area, determine the workers exposures. (SRO ONLY) determine any administrative requirements. This is a modified JPM. NUREG-l 021, Revision 9 ES-301 Administrative Topics Outline Form ES-301-1 Admin Task Description A 1 a The applicants will perform a QPTR calculation that will result in QPTR being outside of requirements. The conditions of this JPM are significantly modified from a bank JPM. A 1 b The applicants will determine Mode 5 required boron concentration during a natural circulation cooldown, and then also determine maximum allowable cooldown rate for current plant conditions, (No CRDM Fans running) and maximum allowable RCS temperature for the given RCS pressure using curves in EOP-1.3. This is a new JPM. A2 The applicants will prepare a tagout manually without the aid of computers. They will be required to identify critical isolation boundaries as well as sequence of tag placement for a Component Cooling Water Pump. This JPM is new A3 Given a task to perform in the Radiological Controlled Area, determine the worker's exposures. (SRO ONLY) determine any administrative requirements. This is a modified JPM. NUREG-1021, Revision 9
ES-301 Administrative Topics Outline Form ES-301-1 Facility: VC Summer Date of Examination: 6/4/2007 Examination Level (circle one): RO I SRO Operating Test Number: NRC Administrative Topic Type Describe activity to be performed (see Note) Code* 2.1.7 Ability to evaluate plant performance and make Conduct of Operations operational judgments based on operating characteristics, reactor behavior, and M,R instrument interpretation (3.7) Perform a QPTR Calculation for dropped control rod 2.1.25 Ability to obtain and interpret station reference Conduct of Operations materials such as graphs, nomographs, and N,R tables which contain performance data (3.1) Review a Shutdown Margin calculation 2.2.13 Knowledge of tagging and clearance Equipment Control N R procedures (3.8) Review a manual tagout of safety related equipment 2.2.12 Knowledge of Surveillance Procedures (3.4) Equipment Control M, R Operational Leak Rate Test (*) 2.3.2 Knowledge of facility ALARA program (2.9) Radiation Control M, R Determine Worker Exposure 2.4.44 Knowledge of Emergency Plan Protective Emergency Plan Action Recommendations (4.0) N,R For plant conditions indicating a General Emergency, perform a PAR NOTE: All items (5 total are required for SROs. RO applicants require only 4 items unless they are retaking only the administrative topics, when 5 are required.) (*) This JPM given to One (1) candidate NUREG-1 021, Revision 9 ES-301 Administrative Topics Outline Form ES-301-1 Facility: VC Summer Date of Examination: 6/4/2007 Examination Level (circle one): RO/SRO Operating Test Number: NRC Administrative Topic Type Describe activity to be performed (see Note) Code* 2.1.7 Ability to evaluate plant performance and make Conduct of Operations operational judgments based on operating M,R characteristics, reactor behavior, and instrument interpretation (3.7) Perform a QPTR Calculation for dropped control rod 2.1.25 Ability to obtain and interpret station reference Conduct of Operations materials such as graphs, nomographs, and N,R tables which contain performance data (3.1 ) Review a Shutdown Margin calculation 2.2.13 Knowledge of tagging and clearance Equipment Control N,R procedures (3.8) Review a manual tagout of safety related equipment 2.2.12 Knowledge of Surveillance Procedures (3.4) Equipment Control M,R Operational Leak Rate Test (*) 2.3.2 Knowledge of facility ALARA program (2.9) Radiation Control M,R Determine Worker Exposure 2.4.44 Knowledge of Emergency Plan Protective Emergency Plan Action Recommendations (4.0) N,R For plant conditions indicating a General Emergency, perform a PAR NOTE: All items (5 total are required for SROs. RO applicants require only 4 items unless they are retaking only the administrative topics, when 5 are required.) (*) This JPM given to One (1) candidate NUREG-1021, Revision 9
ES-301 Administrative Topics Outline Form ES-301-1
Type Codes & Criteria:
(C)ontrol room Class(R)oom (D)irect from bank ( 3 for ROs; for SROs & RO retakes) (N)ew or (M)odified from bank (> 1) (P)revious 2 exams ( 1; randomly selected) (S)imulator NUREG-1 021, Revision 9 ES-301
Type Codes & Criteria:
NUREG-1 021, Revision 9 Administrative Topics Outline (C)ontrol room Class(R)oom Form ES-301-1 (D)irect from bank (s 3 for ROs; s for SROs & RO retakes) (N)ew or (M)odified from bank (> 1) (P)revious 2 exams (s 1; randomly selected) (S)imulator
ES-301 Administrative Topics Outline Form ES301-l Admin Task Description Al a The applicants will perform a QPTR calculation that will result in QPTR being outside of requirements. The applicants will also determine Technical Specification action requirements. The conditions of this JPM are significantly modified from a bank JPM. Al b The applicants will review a Shutdown Margin calculation that will contain critical errors, resulting in Shutdown Margin Being outside of requirements. They will then determine appropriate action required in accordance with Technical Specifications. This is a new JPM. A2 The applicants will review a tagout prepared manually without the aid of computers. There will be 4 critical errors on the prepared tagout, including a sequencing error, component misidentification, and tag assignment missing for a critical component. This JPM is new. A2 (*) The applicant will conduct and Operational Leak Rate Test (STP-l 14.02) W!O IPCS Lear Rate Program available and determine leakage is outside the TS limit. A3 Given a task to perform in the Radiological Controlled Area, determine the workers exposures. (SRO ONLY) determine any administrative requirements. This is a modified JPM. A4 The applicants will be given plant conditions indicating that a general emergency exists. They must classify the event and make initial Protective Action Recommendations must be made. This JPM is new. NUREG-l 021, Revision 9 ES-301 Administrative Topics Outline Form ES-301-1 Admin Task Description A 1 a The applicants will perform a QPTR calculation that will result in QPTR being outside of requirements. The applicants will also determine Technical Specification action requirements. The conditions of this JPM are significantly modified from a bank JPM. A 1 b The applicants will review a Shutdown Margin calculation that will contain critical errors, resulting in Shutdown Margin Being outside of requirements. They will then determine appropriate action required in accordance with Technical Specifications. This is a new JPM. A2 The applicants will review a tagout prepared manually without the aid of computers. There will be 4 critical errors on the prepared tagout, including a sequencing error, component misidentification, and tag assignment missing for a critical component. This JPM is new. A2 (*) The applicant will conduct and Operational Leak Rate Test (STP-114.02) WIO IPCS Lear Rate Program available and determine leakage is outside the TS limit. A3 Given a task to perform in the Radiological Controlled Area, determine the worker's exposures. (SRO ONLY) determine any administrative requirements. This is a modified JPM. A4 The applicants will be given plant conditions indicating that a general emergency exists. They must classify the event and make initial Protective Action Recommendations must be made. This JPM is new. NUREG-1 021, Revision 9
ES-301 Control Room/In-Plant Systems Outline Form ES-301-2 Facility: VC Summer Date of Examination: 6/4/2007 Exam Level (circle one): RO / SRO(l) / SRO (U) Operating Test No.: NRC Control Room Systems (8 for RO; 7 for SRO-l; 2 or 3 for SRO-U) System / JPM Title Type Cocle* Safety Function a. System 004 M, A, E, S I Initiate Emergency Boration in accordance with EOP-1.IIAOP-1 06.1, EMERGENCY BORATION. b. EPE E03 N, A, E, S 3 De-pressurize the RCS to refill the Pressurizer in accordance with EOP-2.1, POST-LOCA COOLDOWN AND DEPRESSURIZATION. c. System 005 N, L, S 4P Shift operating RHR loops with RHR cooling in service in accordance with SOP-115, RESIDUAL HEAT REMOVAL SYSTEM. d. System 006 D, A, E, S 2 Transfer to cold leg recirculation in accordance with EOP-2.2, TRANSFER TO COLD LEG RECIRCULATION. e. System 041 N,A,E,S 4S Take corrective action for a steam clump valve failure in accordance with EOP-1.1, Reactor Trip Response f. System 103 N, S 5 Lower Reactor Building pressure in accordance with SOP-114, REACTOR BUILDING VENTILATION SYSTEM. g. System 062 D, A, S 6 Take corrective action for a high temperature on the Unit Auxiliary Transformer in accordance with the alarm response procedure and SOP-304, 11 5KV/7.2KV OPERATIONS. h. Systemol5 P,D,E,S 7 Respond to a failure of PRNIS Channel N-44 in accordance with AOP-401.10, POWER RANGE CHANNEL FAILURE. In-Plant Systems (3 for RO; 3 for SRO-I; 3 or 2 for SRO-U) NUREG-1021, Revision 9 ES-301 Control Room/In-Plant Systems Outline Form ES-301-2 Facility: . VC Summer Date of Examination: 6/4/2007 Exam Level (circle one): RO / SRO(I) / SRO (U) Operating Test No.: NRC Control Room Systems@ (8 for RO; 7 for SRO-I; 2 or 3 for SRO-U) System / JPM Title Type Code* Safety Function
a.
System 004 M,A,E,S 1 Initiate Emergency Boration in accordance with EOP-1.1/AOP-10S.1, EMERGENCY BORATION.
b.
EPE E03 N,A, E,S 3 De-pressurize the RCS to refill the Pressurizer in accordance with EOP-2.1, POST-LOCA COOLDOWN AND DEPRESSURIZATION.
c.
System OOS N,L,S 4P Shift operating RHR loops with RHR cooling in service in accordance with SOP-11S, RESIDUAL HEAT REMOVAL SYSTEM.
d.
System 006 D,A,E,S 2 Transfer to cold leg recirculation in accordance with EOP-2.2, TRANSFER TO COLD LEG RECIRCULATION.
e.
System 041 N,A,E,S 4S Take corrective action for a steam dump valve failure in accordance with EOP-1.1, Reactor Trip Response
f.
System 103 N,S 5 Lower Reactor Building pressure in accordance with SOP-114, REACTOR BUILDING VENTILATION SYSTEM.
g.
System 062 D,A,S 6 Take corrective action for a high temperature on the Unit Auxiliary Transformer in accordance with the alarm response procedure and SOP-304, 115KV/7.2KV OPERATIONS.
h.
System 015 P,D,E,S 7 Respond to a failure of PRNIS Channel N-44 in accordance with AOP-401.10, POWER RANGE CHANNEL FAILURE. In-Plant Systems@ (3 for RO; 3 for SRO-I; 3 or 2 for SRO-U) NUREG-1021, Revision 9
ES-301 Control Room/In-Plant Systems Outline Form ES-301-2 i. System 064 0, E, A 6 Locally start an Emergency Diesel Generator in accordance with EOP-6.0, LOSS OF ALL ESF AC POWER. j. System 071 0, R 9 Recover from an automatic termination of a waste gas release n accordance with SOP-Il 9, WASTE GAS PROCESSING. k. System 061 P,D,E,R 4S Start the Turbine-driven EFW Pump and control flow in accordance with FEP-4.0, CONTROL ROOM EVACUATION DUE TO FIRE, Enclosure F. All control room (and in-plant) systems must be different and serve different safety functions; in-plant systems and functions may overlap those tested in the control room.
Type Codes Criteria for RO / SRO-l / SRO-U (A)lternate path 4-6 / 4-6 / 2-3 (C)ontrol room (D)irect from bank 9 /
8 / 4 (E)mergency or abnormal in-plant 1 / 1 I 1 (L)ow-Power 1 I I / I (N)ew or (M)odifled from bank including 1 (A) 2 I 2 / 1 (P)revious 2 exams 3 / 3 / 2 (randomly selected) (R)CA 1/ 1! 1 (S)imulator NUREG-1021, Revision 9 ES-301 Control Room/ln-Plant Systems Outline Form ES-301-2
i.
System 064 D,E,A 6 Locally start an Emergency Diesel Generator in accordance with EOP-6.0, LOSS OF ALL ESF AC POWER.
j.
System 071 D,R
lI Recover from an automatic termination of a waste gas release in accordance with SOP-119, WASTE GAS PROCESSING.

k.
System 061 P,D,E,R 4S Start the Turbine-driven EFW Pump and control flow in accordance with FEP-4.0, CONTROL ROOM EVACUATION DUE TO FIRE, Enclosure F. All control room (and in-plant) systems must be different and serve different safety functions; in-plant systems and functions may overlap those tested in the control room.
Type Codes Criteria for RO I SRO-II SRO-U (A)lternate path 4-6 I 4-6 I 2-3 (C)ontrol room (D)irect from bank 9/ 8/ 4 (E)mergency or abnormal in-plant 1 /
1 / 1 (L)ow-Power 1 / 1 / 1 (N)ew or (M)odified from bank including 1 (A) 2/ 2/ 1 (P)revious 2 exams 3/ 3/ 2 (randomly selected) (R)CA 1 I 1 / 1 (S)imulator NUREG-1021, Revision 9
ES-301 Control Room/In-Plant Systems Outline Form ES-301-2 VC Summer 2007 NRC Exam JPM Summary a. Initiate Emergency Boration in accordance with EOP-1.1, REACTOR TRIP RECOVERY, and AOP-106.1, EMERGENCY BORATION. Modify Bank JPM JPS-003 to start in EOP 1.1, requiring the applicant to make the decision that emergency boration is required. Initial attempt will fail, requiring use of AOP-106.1 to initiate an alternate path. RO and SROU b. De-pressurize the RCS to refill the Pressurizer using a PORV in accordance with EOP 2.1, POST-LOCA COOLDOWN AND DEPRESSURIZATION, Step 8. The alternate path is that the applicant must use a PZR PORV to depressurize because no RCP are running and the PZR PORV will fail to close requiring the respective isolation valve to be closed. New JPM. RO and SROU. c. Shift operating RHR loops with RHR cooling in service in accordance with SOP-i 15, RESIDUAL HEAT REMOVAL SYSTEM. New JPM. RO and SROU. d. Transfer to cold leg recirculation in accordance with EOP-2.2, TRANSFER TO COLD LEG RECIRCULATION. The applicant will assume the watch with the criteria met for transfer to cold leg recirculation. The alternate path is that the applicant must make a specific discharge cross-connect alignment because only one Charging Pump is running. Bank JPM JPSF-005. RO only. e. Take corrective action for a steam dump valve failure in accordance with EOP-i.i, REACTOR TRIP RESPONSE. The alternate path is that the applicant will be required to evaluate Steam Dump response and take compensatory action for a valve failure. Ultimate action will be to either reduce EFW flow or close the MSIVs. New JPM. RO only. f. Lower Reactor Building pressure in accordance with SOP-i 14, REACTOR BUILDING VENTILATION SYSTEM, Section 0- LOWERING REACTOR BUILDING PRESSURE USING NORMAL PRESSURE CONTROL. The applicant will assume the watch with Reactor Building pressure approaching the Technical Specification limit and be directed to implement the referenced procedure. New JPM. RO only. g. Take corrective action for a high temperature on the Unit Auxiliary Transformer in accordance with the alarm response procedure and SOP-304, 11 5KV17.2KV OPERATIONS. The applicant will assume the watch and respond to alarm ARP-OO1 - XCP-633-6-3, UNIT AUX XFMR XTF-2 TRBL. The alternate path is that the report from the field will require the applicant to transfer the BOP buses to the alternate feed so that the transformer can be de-energized. Bank JPM JPSF-139. RO only. h. Respond to a failure of PRNIS Channel N-44 in accordance with AOP-401.1O, POWER RANGE CHANNEL FAILURE. The applicant will assume the watch with the unit at full power and respond to failure of N-44. Randomly selected task from the 2004 NRC Exam/Bank JPM JPS-008. RO only. NUREG-1021, Revision 9 ES-301 Control Room/In-Plant Systems Outline Form ES-301-2 VC Summer 2007 NRC Exam JPM Summary
a. Initiate Emergency Boration in accordance with EOP-1.1, REACTOR TRIP RECOVERY, and AOP-106.1, EMERGENCY BORATION. Modify Bank JPM JPS-003 to start in EOP-1.1, requiring the applicant to make the decision that emergency boration is required.
Initial attempt will fail, requiring use of AOP-106.1 to initiate an alternate path. RO and SROU
b. De-pressurize the RCS to refill the Pressurizer using a PORV in accordance with EOP-2.1, POST-LOCA COOLDOWN AND DEPRESSURIZATION, Step 8. The alternate path is that the applicant must use a PZR PORV to depressurize because no Rep's are running and the PZR PORV will fail to close requiring the respective isolation valve to be closed. New JPM. RO and SROU.

c. Shift operating RHR loops with RHR cooling in service in accordance with SOP-11S, RESIDUAL HEAT REMOVAL SYSTEM. New JPM. RO and SROU.

d. Transfer to cold leg recirculation in accordance with EOP-2.2, TRANSFER TO COLD LEG RECIRCULATION. The applicant wi" assume the watch with the criteria met for transfer to cold leg recirculation. The alternate path is that the applicant must make a specific discharge cross-connect alignment because only one Charging Pump is running. Bank JPM JPSF-OOS. RO only.

e. Take corrective action for a steam dump valve failure in accordance with EOP-1.1, REACTOR TRIP RESPONSE. The alternate path is that the applicant will be required to evaluate Steam Dump response and take compensatory action for a valve failure.
Ultimate action wi" be to either reduce EFW flow or close the MSIVs. New JPM. RO only.
f.
Lower Reactor Building pressure in accordance with SOP-114, REACTOR BUILDING VENTILATION SYSTEM, Section 0 - LOWERING REACTOR BUILDING PRESSURE USING NORMAL PRESSURE CONTROL. The applicant will assume the watch with Reactor Building pressure approaching the Technical Specification limit and be directed to implement the referenced procedure. New JPM. RO only.
g. Take corrective action for a high temperature on the Unit Auxiliary Transformer in accordance with the alarm response procedure and SOP-304, 11SKVI7.2KV OPERATIONS. The applicant will assume the watch and respond to alarm ARP-001-XC P-633-6-3, UNIT AUX XFMR XTF-2 TRBL. The alternate path is that the report from the field will require the applicant to transfer the BOP buses to the alternate feed so that the transformer can be de-energized. Bank JPM JPSF-139. RO only.

h. Respond to a failure of PRNIS Channel N-44 in accordance with AOP-401.1 0, POWER RANGE CHANNEL FAILURE. The applicant wi" assume the watch with the unit at full power and respond to failure of N-44. Randomly selected task from the 2004 NRC Exam/Bank JPM JPS-008. RO only.
NUREG-1021, Revision 9
ES-301 Control Room/In-Plant Systems Outline Form ES-301-2 i. Locally start an Emergency Diesel Generator in accordance with EOP-6.O, LOSS OF ALL ESF AC POWER. The applicant will simulate performance of EOP-6.O, ATTACHMENT I LOCAL STARTING AND LOADING DIESEL GENERATOR. The applicant must implement an alternate path when the diesel does not start after the ENGINE SHUTDOWN RESET pushbutton is depressed. Bank JPM JPPF-012B. RO and SROU. j. Recover from an automatic termination of a waste gas release in accordance with SOP-119, WASTE GAS PROCESSING. The applicant will reinstate a waste gas release that was terminated when a radiation monitor failed. Bank JPM JPP-039. RO and SROU. k. Start the TDEFW Pump and control flow in accordance with FEP-4.O, CONTROL ROOM EVACUATION DUE TO FIRE, Enclosure F. The applicant will simulate starting the TDEFW Pump and align/control flow. Randomly selected task from the 2005 NRC Exam/Bank JPM JPP-055. RO only. NUREG-1021, Revision 9 ES-301 Control Room/In-Plant Systems Outline Form ES-301-2
i.
Locally start an Emergency Diesel Generator in accordance with EOP-6.0, LOSS OF ALL ESF AC POWER. The applicant will simulate performance of EOP-6.0, ATTACHMENT 1 - LOCAL STARTING AND LOADING DIESEL GENERATOR. The applicant must implement an alternate path when the diesel does not start after the ENGINE SHUTDOWN RESET pushbutton is depressed. Bank JPM JPPF-012B. RO and SROU.
j.
Recover from an automatic termination of a waste gas release in accordance with SOP-119, WASTE GAS PROCESSING. The applicant will reinstate a waste gas release that was terminated when a radiation monitor failed. Bank JPM JPP-039. RO and SROU.
k.
Start the TDEFW Pump and control flow in accordance with FEP-4.0, CONTROL ROOM EVACUATION DUE TO FIRE, Enclosure F. The applicant will simulate starting the TDEFW Pump and align/control flow. Randomly selected task from the 2005 NRC Exam/Bank JPM JPP-055. RO only. NUREG-1021, Revision 9
ES-301 Operating Test Quality Checklist Form ES-301-3 Facility: VC Summer Date of Examination: 6/4/2007 Operating Test Number: NRC Initials
1. GENERAL CRITERIA
a b* c# a. The operating test conforms with the previously approved outline; changes are consistent with sampling requirements (e.g. 10 CFR 55.45, operational importance, safety function jj distribution). b. There is no day-to-day repetition between this and other operating tests to be administered during this examination. c. The operating test shall not duplicate items from the applicants audit test(s) (see Section D.1.a). d. Overlap with the written examination and between different parts of the operating test is within acceptable limits. e. It appears that the operating test will differentiate between competent and less-than-competent applicants at the designated license level.
2. WALK-THROUGH CRITERIA a.
Each JPM includes the following, as applicable:
initial conditions initiating cues references and tools, including associated procedures reasonable and validated time limits (average time allowed for completion) and specific p designation if deemed to be time-critical by the facility licensee operationally important specific performance criteria that include: - detailed expected actions with exact criteria and nomenclature - system response and other examiner cues - statements describing important observations to be made by the applicant - criteria for successful completion of the task - identification of critical steps and their associated performance standards - restrictions on the sequence of steps, if applicable b. Ensure that any changes from the previously approved systems and administrative walk-through outlines (Forms ES-301-1 and 2) have not caused the test to deviate from any of the acceptance criteria (e.g., item distribution, bank use, repetition from the last 2 NRC examinations) specified on those forms and Form ES-201-2.
3. SIMULATOR CRITERIA The associated simulator operating tests (scenario sets) have been reviewed in accordance with Form ES-301-4 and a copy is attached.
Printed ame! Sig 9 a)ur Date a. Author Joseph G. Arsenault 4/12/2007 b. Facility Reviewer (*) 7 c. NRC Chief Examiner (#) d. NRCSupervisor /2-.4. .J3l/7 NOTE: The facility signature is not applicable for NRC-developed tests. Independent NRC reviewer initial items in Column c; chief examiner concurrence required, NUREG-1021, Revision 9 ES-301 Operating Test Quality Checklist Form ES-301-3 b,tt, VC Summer Date of Examination: 6/4/2007 Operating Test Number: ~ Initials
1. GENERAL CRITERIA a
b* c#
a.
The operating test conforms with the previously approved outline; changes are consistent ~ ~ with sampling requirements (e.g. 10 CFR 55.45, operational importance, safety function I~ distribution ).
b.
There is no day-to-day repetition between this and other operating tests to be administered ~ ~- ~ during this examination.
c.
The operating test shall not duplicate items from the applicants' audit test(s) (see Section ~ ~ I D.1.a).
d.
Overlap with the written examination and between different parts of the operating test is ~ "4 .J ~ within acceptable limits. V-
e.
It appears that the operating test will differentiate between competent and less-than- ~ 1-{V competent applicants at the designated license level.
2. WALK-THROUGH CRITERIA I

a.
Each JPM includes the following, as applicable: initial conditions initiating cues
references and tools, including associated procedures reasonable and validated time limits (average time allowed for completion) and specific r-~
designation if deemed to be time-critical by the facility licensee ~
operationally important specific performance criteria that include:
- detailed expected actions with exact criteria and nomenclature - system response and other examiner cues - statements describing important observations to be made by the applicant - criteria for successful completion of the task - identification of critical steps and their associated performance standards - restrictions on the sequence of steps, if applicable
b.
Ensure that any changes from the previously approved systems and administrative walk-It through outlines (Forms ES-301-1 and 2) have not caused the test to deviate from any of ~ r the acceptance criteria (e.g., item distribution, bank use, repetition from the last 2 NRC examinations) specified on those forms and Form ES-201-2.
3. SIMULATOR CRITERIA 1
The associated simulator operating tests (scenario sets) have been reviewed in accordance with ~ f--IA~ Form ES-301-4 and a copy is attached. printM~t2 ~ Date
a.
Author Joseph G. Arsenault ~ 4/1212007
b.
Facility Reviewer (*) fA-. I {( lIiPv< R.. r2 v I 'ul£ V M Ji!~~' 1< N lL~ Yjj'f/; Of) 7
c.
NRC Chief Examiner (#) ~At7l\\. \\J r L.~5t;( 1.,jf~~.cvJ1J.' ;j(~ 5 )3; J7uJ7
d.
NRC Supervisor
g> \\o,,-..-t I~AA(,-J ~
r- ~- 5/31,/.>>7 NOTE: The facility signature is not applicable for NRC-developed tests. Independent NRC reviewer initial items in Column "c"; chief examiner concurrence required, NUREG-1021, Revision 9
ES-301 Simulator Scenario Quality Checklist Form ES-301-4 Facility: Summer Date of Exam: 6/4/07 Scenario Numbers: 1/2/3 Operating Test No.: NRC QUALITATIVE ATTRIBUTES lrutials a b* 1. The initial conditions are realistic, in that some equipment and/or instrumentation may be out of r 1 j) service, but it does not cue the operators into expected events. 2. The scenarios consist mostly of related events. 3. Each event description consists of the point in the scenario when it is to be initiated the malfunction(s) that are entered to initiate the event c4 the symptoms/cues that will be visible to the crew the expected operator actions (by shift position) the event termination point (if applicable) 4. No more than one non-mechanistic failure (e.g., pipe break) is incorporated into the scenario without a credible preceding incident such as a seismic event. 5. The events are valid with regard to physics and thermodynamics. 6. Sequencing and timing of events is reasonable, and allows the examination team to obtain complete evaluation results commensurate with the scenario objectives. 7. If time compression techniques are used, the scenario summary clearly so indicates. Operators have sufficient time to carry out expected activities without undue time constraints. 8. The simulator modeling is not altered. 9. The scenarios have been validated. Pursuant to 10 CFR 55.46(d), any open simulator performance deficiencies or deviations from the referenced plant have been evaluated to ensure that functional fidelity is maintained while running the planned scenarios. 10. Every operator will be evaluated using at least one new or significantly modified scenario. All other (.cl,A scenarios have been altered in accordance with Section D.5 of ES-301. 11. All individual operator competencies can be evaluated, as verified using Form ES-301-6 (submit the form along with the simulator scenarios).
12. Each applicant will be significantly involved in the minimum number of transients and events specified on Form ES-301-5 (submit the form with the simulator scenarios). 13. The level of difficulty is appropriate to support licensing decisions for each crew position.
== Target Quantitative Attributes Actual Attributes (Per Scenario; See Section D.5.d) (Scenario) 1. Total malfunctions (5-8) 9 8 (j4 2. Malfunctions after EOP entry (1-2) 4 3 3 (54.*r 3. Abnormal events (2-4) 2 5 3 Q4 -1__- 4. Major transients (1-2) 2 2 2 5. EOPs entered/requiring substantive actions (1-2) 1 1 2 6. EOP contingencies requiring substantive actions (0-2) 1 0 0 i4 7. Critical tasks (2-3> 2 2 2 NUREG-1021, Revision 9 ES-301 Simulator Scenario Quality Checklist Form ES-301-4 Facility: Summer Date of Exam: 6/4/07 Scenario Numbers: 1/2/3 Operating Test No..
1.

2.
QUALITATIVE ATTRIBUTES The initial conditions are realistic, in that some equipment and/or instrumentation may be out of service, but it does not cue the operators into expected events. The scenarios consist mostly of related events.
3.
Each event description consists of
4.

5.

6.

7.

8.

9.

10.

11.

12.

13.

1.

2.

3.

4.

5.

6.

7.
the pOint in the scenario when it is to be initiated the malfunction(s) that are entered to initiate the event the symptoms/cues that will be visible to the crew the expected operator actions (by shift position) the event termination point (if applicable) No more than one non-mechanistic failure (e.g., pipe break) is incorporated into the scenario without a credible preceding incident such as a seismic event. The events are valid with regard to physics and thermodynamics. Sequencing and timing of events is reasonable, and allows the examination team to obtain complete evaluation results commensurate with the scenario objectives. If time compression techniques are used, the scenario summary clearly so indicates. Operators have sufficient time to carry out expected activities without undue time constraints. The simulator modeling is not altered. The scenarios have been validated. Pursuant to 10 CFR 55.46( d), any open simulator performance deficiencies or deviations from the referenced plant have been evaluated to ensure that functional fidelity is maintained while running the planned scenarios. Every operator will be evaluated using at least one new or significantly modified scenario. All other scenarios have been altered in accordance with Section 0.5 of ES-301. All individual operator competencies can be evaluated, as verified using Form ES-301-6 (submit the form along with the simulator scenarios). Each applicant will be significantly involved in the minimum number of transients and events specified on Form ES-301-5 (submit the form with the simulator scenarios). The level of difficulty is appropriate to support licensing decisions for each crew position. Target Quantitative Attributes Actual Attributes (Per Scenario; See Section D.S.d) (Scenario) 1 2 Total malfunctions (5-8) 9 9 Malfunctions after EOP entry (1-2) 4 3 Abnormal events (2-4) 2 5 Major transients (1-2) 2 2 EOPs entered/requiring substantive actions (1-2) 1 1 EOP contingencies requiring substantive actions (0-2) 1 0 Critical tasks (2-3) 2 2 3 8 3 3 2 2 0 2 NUREG-1021, Revision 9 Initials a b* c# f)
SCANA 5/31/2007 10:48:14 AN PAGE 4/043 Fax Server Eoi Transient and Event Checklist Form ES-301-5 Fad ity: VC Summer Date of Exam: 614/2007 Operating Test No.: NRC Scenarios E N 1 2 3 4 5 T T
0 MINIMUM Crew Crew Crew Crew Crew T T Position Position Position Position Position A L 1 P R T 0 R T 0 R T 0 R T 0 R T 0 R I LI r E 0 C P 0 C P 0 C P 0 C P 0 C p RX 5 NOR 1 liii RO. I/C 24 5 4 4 2 MAJOR 7 7 10 9 4 2 2 1 TS 0022 RX 3 1110 NOR 5 liii RO. I/C 36 2 5 4 4 2 MAJOR 7 7 10 9 4 2 2 1 TS
00 22 RX 5 1 1 10 NOR 1 Elili RO-I/C 24 34 5 4 4 2 6 MAJOR 7 7 10 9 4 2 2 1 TS 0022 lnstr ctions: Circle the applicant level and enter the operating test number and Form ES-D-1 event numbers foi each event type; TS are not applicable for RO applicants. ROs must service in both the at-the-controls (ATC) and balanGe-of-plant (SOP) positions; Instant SROs must do one scenario, including at least two instrument or component (I/C) malfunctions and one major transient, in the ATC position. 2. Reactivity manipulations may be conducted under normal or controlled abnormal conditions (refer to Section D.5.d) but must be significant per Section C.2.a of Appendix 0. (*) Reactivity and normal evolutions may be replaced with additional insirument or component malfunctions on a 1-for-i basis. 3. Whenever practical, both instrument and component malfunctions should be included; only those that require verifiable actions that provide insight to the applicants competence count toward the minimum requirements specified for the applicants license level in the right-hand columns. This fcrm assumes Scenarios land 2 are to be performed. with scenario 3 as the spare. Only required positions are listed for attribu: as. NURE3 1021 Revision 9 SCANA 5/31/2007 10:48:14 AM PAGE 4/043 Fax Server ES-~~01~ ___________________ T~r~an~s~ie~n~t~an~d~E~v~e~n~tC~he~c~k~!js~t _______________ ~F~o~rm~E~S~-3~0~1~-5~ Fad ity: VC Summer Date of Exam: 6/4/2007 Operating Test No.: NRC 1=-' E Scenarios ~ V E N 1 2 3 4 5 T T 0 MINIMUM I Crew Crew Crew Crew Crew T T Position Position Position Position Position A ~ ,\\ L Y S A B S A B S A B S A B S A B !~ P R T 0 R T 0 R T 0 R T 0 R T 0 R I U r E 0 C P 0 C P 0 C P 0 C P 0 C P ~, -. _.= RX 5 1 1 1 NOR 1 1 1 1 RO*' I/C 24 34 5 4 4 6 MAJOR 7 7 10 9 4 2 2 TS 0 0 2 i-== RX 3 1 1 1 NOR 5 1 1 1 RO*:: IIC 36 24 5 4 4 5 MAJOR 7 7 10 9 4 2 2 TS 0 0 2 RX 5 1 1 1 NOR 1 1 1 1 RO*~ flC 24 34 5 4 4 6 MAJOR 7 7 10 9 4 2 2 TS 0 0 2 Instn ctions:
1.
Circle the applicant level and enter the operating test number and Form ES-D-1 event numbers fOI each event type; T5 are not applicable for RO applicants, ROs must service in both the "at-the-controls (ATC)" and "balanGe-of-plant (BOP)" positions; Instant SROs must do one scenario, including at least two instrument or component (I/C) malfunctions and one major transient, in the ATC position. 0 1 2 1 2 0 1 2 1 2 0 1 2 1 2
2.
Reactivity manipulations may be conducted under normal or control/ed abnormal conditions (refer to Section D.5,d) but must be significant per Section C,2,a of Appendix D, (*) Reactivity and normal evolutions may be replaced with additional instrument or component malfunctions on a 1-for-1 basis. 3, Whenever practical, both instrument and component malfunctions should be included; only those that require verifiable actions that provide insight to the applicant's competence count toward the minimum requirements specified for the applicant's license level in the right-hand columns. This fcrm assumes Scenarios land 2 are to be performed, with scenario 3 as the spare. Only required positions are listed for attribUl es. NURE3 1021 Revision 9 I I I
ES-30 1 Comretencies Checklist Form ES-301 -6 Instructions: Circle the applicants license type and enter one or more event numbers that will allow the examiners to evaluate every applicable competency for every applicant. Facility: VC Summer Date of Examination: 6/4/07 Operating Test No. NRC 1-3 SRO RO(ATC) BOP Competencies SCENARIO SCENARIO SCENARIO 1 2 34 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 Interpret/Diag-2,34, 3,4,5, nose Events 1-4, 2,4, 2-11 3-10 7,8, 3,5,7, 3,67, 8,9, 4,6-9 6-11 7-11 8,10 8,11 and Conditions 10 11 Comply With 2,3,5, 1,3,4, 2-5, 2-4, 7,8, 3,5,6, 1,4 and Use ALL ALL ALL 7-11 7-11 8,11 Procedures (1) 10 811 6-9 Operate 2,4,5, 1,3,4, Control Boards N/A N/A N/A 7,8,9 2-4, 2,3,5, 3,5,6, 7,10 7,10 8,11 5,8,9, 1,4,6, (2) 11 Communicate 2-4, 2,3,5, and ALL ALL ALL 2,4,5, 7,8, 7,8, 3,5,6, 1,3,4, 1,4, 5,8,9, 7-11 8,11 Interact 10,11 10 6-9 Demonstrate Supervisory ALL ALL ALL N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Ability (3) Comply With and Use Tech. 1,4 4,6, N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Specs. (3) Notes: (1) Includes Technical Specification compliance for an RD. (2) Optional for an SRO-U. (3) Only applicable to SROs. NUREG-1021, Revision 9 ES-301 Competencies Checklist Form ES-301-6 Facility: VCSummer Date of Examination: 6/4/07 Operating Test No. NRC 1-3 SRO RO (ATC) BOP Competencies SCENARIO SCENARIO SCENARIO 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 I nterpretlDiag-1-4, 2,4, 2,3,4, 3,5,7, 3,6,7, 3,4,5, nose Events 2-11 3-10 7,8, 8,9, 4,6-9 6-11 7-11 8,10 8,11 and Conditions 10 11 Comply With 2-5, 2-4, 2,3,5, 3,5,6, 1,3,4, 1,4, and Use ALL ALL ALL 7,8, 5, 7-11 7-11 8,11 6-9 Procedures (1) 10 8-11 Operate 2,4,5, 2-4, 2,3,5, 3,5,6, 1,3,4, 1,4,6, Control Boards N/A N/A N/A 7,8,9 5,8,9, (2) 11 7,10 7,10 8,11 11 8,9 Communicate 2-4, 2,3,5, 1,3,4, 1,4, and ALL ALL ALL 2,4,5, 7,8, 7,8, 3,5,6, 5,8,9, 7-11 8,11 11 6-9 Interact 10,11 10 Demonstrate Supervisory ALL ALL ALL N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Ability (3) Comply With 4,5,6, and Use Tech. 1,4 7 3,4 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Specs. (3) Notes: (1 ) Includes Technical Specification compliance for an RO. (2) Optional for an SRO-U. (3) Only applicable to SROs. Instructions: Circle the applicants' license type and enter one or more event numbers that will allow the examiners to evaluate every applicable competency for every applicant. NUREG-1021, Revision 9
ES-401 Written Examination Quality Checklist Form ES-401-6 FINAL Facility: VC Summer Date of Exam: 6/4/2007 Exam ROISRO Level: Initial Item Description a b* c# 1 Questions and answers technically accurate and applicable to facility. So )!1 2. a. NRC K/As referenced for all questions. I 2j. b. Facility learning objectives referenced as available.
3. SRO questions are appropriate in accordance with Section D.2.d of ES-401 4. The sampling process was random and systematic. (If more than 4 RO and 2 SRO questions were repeated from the last 2 NRC licensing exams, consult the NRR OL g Office) 5. Question duplication from the license screening/audit exam was controlled as indicated below (check the item that applies) and appears appropriate: the audit exam was systematically and randomly developed, or the audit exam was completed before the license exam was started, or
the examinations were developed independently, or XX the licensee certifies that there is no duplication, or other (explain) 6. Bank use meets limits (no more than 75 percent Bank Modified New from the bank at least 10 percent new, and the rest new or modified); enter the actual RO / SRO-only 45 / 28 1 1 / 24 44/48
question_distribution(s)_at_right._(IN_%) (# of Questions) 34 / 7 8 / 6 33/ 12 7. Between 50 and 60 percent of the question on the Memo C/A RO exam are written at the comprehension! analysis level; the SRO exam may exceed 60 43 / 12 57 / 88 percent if the randomly selected K/As support the higher cognitive levels; enter the actual RO / SRO question distribution(s) at right (IN %) 1)11 (# of Questions) 32 / 3 43 / 22 fr 8. References/handouts provided do not give away answers or aid in the elimination of g distractors. 9. Question content conforms with specific K/A statements in the previously approved examination outline and is appropriate for the tier to which they are assigned; deviations are justified. 10. Question psychometric quality and format meet the guidelines in ES Appendix B. 11. The exam contains the required number of one-point, multiple choice items; the total_is_correct_and_agrees_with_value_on_cover_sheet. Prptd Name / Sign ure Date a. Author Scott Poteet 6/8/2007 b. Facility Reviewer (*) Rusty Quick 77 6/8/2007 c. NRC Chief Examiner (#) e/37 d. NRC Regional Supervisor 7 Note: The facility reviewers initials/signature are not applicable for NRC-developed examinations. Independent NRC reviewer initial items in Column c; chief examiner concurrence required. NUREG-1 021, Revision 9 ES-401 Written Examination Quality Checklist c...
1.

2.

3.

4.
FINAL VC Summer Date of Exam: 6/4/2007 Item Description Questions and answers technically accurate and applicable to facility.
a.
NRC KlAs referenced for all questions.
b.
Facility learning objectives referenced as available. SRO questions are appropriate in accordance with Section D.2.d of ES-401 The sampling process was random and systematic. (If more than 4 RO and 2 SRO questions were repeated from the last 2 NRC licensing exams, consult the NRR OL Program Office)
5.
Question duplication from the license screeninglaudit exam was controlled as indicated below (check the item that applies) and appears appropriate:
6.

7.

8.

9.

10.

11.

a.

b.

c.

d.
the audit exam was systematically and randomly developed, or the audit exam was completed before the license exam was started, or the examinations were developed independently, or xx the licensee certifies that there is no duplication, or other (explain) Bank use meets limits (no more than 75 percent from the bank at least 10 percent new, and the rest new or modified); enter the actual RO I SRO-only question distribution(s) at right. (IN %) Bank 45/28 Modified 11 I 24 New 44148 (# of Questions) 3417 816 33/12 Between 50 and 60 percent of the question on the RO exam are written at the comprehensionl analysis level; the SRO exam may exceed 60 percent if the randomly selected KlAs support the higher cognitive levels; enter the actual RO I SRO question distribution(s) at right (IN %) Memory 43/12 CIA 57/88 (# of Questions) 32/3 43/22 Referenceslhandouts provided do not give away answers or aid in the elimination of distractors. Question content conforms with specific KIA statements in the previously approved examination outline and is appropriate for the tier to which they are assigned; deviations are justified. Question psychometric quality and format meet the guidelines in ES Appendix B. The exam contains the required number of one-point, multiple choice items; the total is correct and aQrees with value on cover sheet. Pri tl3d Name I Sigg~Ure Author Scott Poteet /' C:' t~ -,/ IJYf/ 1It~ ~ < / l Facility Reviewer (*) Rusty Quick '-1f-x~;;),.-fAA b 17 NRC Chief Examiner (#) G~ \\t'.i.LAgcl L~~J)dc:fz;;J!; NRC Regional Supervisor ---i1 01,<.,.... 1 1~A.A0 idt...", 19 Form ES-401-6 Exam Level: a RO/SRO Initial b* ctIrJ 6/8/2007 6/8/2007 6/c-~la:t7 (C/1I/"1 Note: The facility reviewer'S initialslsignature are not applicable for NRC-developed examinations. Independent NRC reviewer initial items in Column "c"; chief examiner concurrence required. NUREG-1 021, Revision 9
ES-401, Rev. 9 Summer 2007-301 RO Written Examination Review Worksheet Form ES-401-9 FINAL 1. 2.
3. Psychometric Flaws

4. Job Content Flaws

5. Other 6.
7. Q# LOK LOD (F/H) (1-5) Stem Cues T/F Cred. Partial Job-Minutia
1 Back-Q=
SRO U/E/ Explanation Focus Dist. Link units ward K/A Only S Instructions [Refer to Section D of ES-401 and Appendix B for additional information regarding each of the following concepts.] 1. Enter the level of knowledge (LOK) of each question as either (F)undamental or (H)igher cognitive level. 2. Enter the level of difficulty (LOD) of each question using a 1 5 (easy difficult) rating scale (questions in the 2 4 range are acceptable). 3. Check the appropriate box if a psychometric flaw is identified: The stem lacks sufficient focus to elicit the correct answer (e.g. unclear intent, more information is needed, or too much needless information). The stem or distractors contain cues (i.e., clues, specific determiners, phrasing, length, etc). The answer choices are a collection of unrelated true/false statements. The distractors are not credible; single implausible distractors should be repaired, more than one is unacceptable. One or more distractors is (are) partially correct (e.g., if the applicant can make unstated assumptions that are not contradicted by stem). 4. Check the appropriate box if a job content error is identified: The question is not linked to the job requirements (i.e., the question has a valid K/A but, as written, is not operational in content). The question requires the recall of knowledge that is too specific for the closed reference test mode (i.e., it is not required to be known from memory). The question contains data with an unrealistic level of accuracy or inconsistent units (e.g., panel meter in percent with question in gallons). The question requires reverse logic or application compared to the job requirements. 5. Check questions that are sampled for conformance with the approved K/A and those that are designated SRO-only (K/A and license level mismatches are unacceptable). 6. Based on the reviewers judgment, is the question as written (U)nsatisfactory (requiring repair or replacement), in need of (E)ditorial enhancement, or (S)atisfactory? 7. At a minimum, explain any ratings (e.g., how the Appendix B psychometric attributes are not being met). ES-401, Rev. 9 Summer 2007-301 RO Written Examination Review Worksheet Form ES-401-9 Q#
1.
LOK (F/H)
2.
LOD (1-5) FINAL
3. Psychometric Flaws

4. Job Content Flaws

5. Other Stem Cues T IF Focus Credo Partial Job-Minutia Dist.
Link
1 Back-Q=
units ward KIA SRO Only Instructions
6.
U/EI S
7.
Explanation [Refer to Section 0 of ES-401 and Appendix B for additional information regarding each of the following concepts.]
1.
Enter the level of knowledge (LOK) of each question as either (F)undamental or (H)igher cognitive level.
2.
Enter the level of difficulty (LOO) of each question using a 1 - 5 (easy - difficult) rating scale (questions in the 2 - 4 range are acceptable).
3.
Check the appropriate box if a psychometric flaw is identified: The stem lacks sufficient focus to elicit the correct answer (e.g., unclear intent, more information is needed, or too much needless information). The stem or distractors contain cues (Le., clues, specific determiners, phrasing, length, etc). The answer choices are a collection of unrelated true/false statements. The distractors are not credible; single implausible distractors should be repaired, more than one is unacceptable. One or more distractors is (are) partially correct (e.g., if the applicant can make unstated assumptions that are not contradicted by stem).
4.
Check the appropriate box if a job content error is identified: The question is not linked to the job requirements (i.e., the question has a valid KIA but, as written, is not operational in content). The question requires the recall of knowledge that is too specific for the closed reference test mode (Le., it is not required to be known from memory). The question contains data with an unrealistic level of accuracy or inconsistent units (e.g., panel meter in percent with question in gallons). The question requires reverse logic or application compared to the job requirements.
5.
Check questions that are sampled for conformance with the approved KIA and those that are designated SRO-only (KIA and license level mismatches are unacceptable).
6.
Based on the reviewer's judgment, is the question as written (U)nsatisfactory (requiring repair or replacement), in need of (E)ditorial enhancement, or (S)atisfactory?
7.
At a minimum, explain any "U" ratings (e.g., how the Appendix B psychometric attributes are not being met).
2.
3. Psychometric Flaws

4. Job Content Flaws

5. Other 6.
7. Q# LOK LOD
(F/H) (1-5) Stem Cuesl TIF Cred. Partial Job-Minutia
1 Back-Q=
SRO U/E/ Explanation Focus
Dt. Link urDts ward KIA Only s F 2 X U 003A4.08 Question appears to meet the K/A. Distractors C and D are subsets of A and B. So why would any one pick C or D? Need to change question so that distractors are not subsets, and are credible. One source has the standby booster pump starting at 50 psig, and two sources state 70 psig. Which is correct? Is the training material incorrect? BANK 4/23/2007 Place question in two column format, ask setpoints, with out subsets. B pump does not start. Changed the stem and format SAT 512912007. 2 H 2 X E 004A3.05 Question appears to meet the K/A. With both 605A & B in auto, it appears that both trains are in service. This makes distractor D confusing. Need to reword this distractor. The way the question is constructed an operator that reviewed the 2006 exam could read this question and answer it just like the previous exam question and get it correct. Move the distractors around so that they do not look Identical to the old question. Modified. 4/23/2007. S Changed the stem to have RHR in manual, changed order of answers. SAT 5I09I2007
1.

2.

3. Psychometric Flaws

4. Job Content Flaws

5. Other

6.

7.
Q# LOK LOD (F/H) (1-5) Stem Cwes T/F Credo Partial Job-Minutia
1 8ack-Q=
SRO utEI Explanation Focus Dist. Link units ward KIA Only S 1 F 2 X U 003A4.08 Question appears to meet the KIA. Distractors C and D are subsets of A and B. 80 why would anyone pick C or D? Need to change question so that distractors are not subsets, and are credible. One source has the standby booster pump starting at 50 psig, and two sources state 70 psig. Which is correct? Is the training material incorrect? BANK 4/23/2007 Place question in two column format, ask setpoints, with out subsets. B pump does not start. Changed the stem and format SAT 5/29/2007. 2 H 2 X E 004A3.05 Question appears to meet the KIA. With both 605A & B in auto, it appears that both trains are in service. This makes distractor D confusing. Need to reword this distractor. The way the question is constructed an operator that reviewed the 2006 exam could read this question and answer it just like the previous exam question and get it correct. Move the distractors around so that they do not look Identical to the old question. Modified. 4/23/2007. 8 Changed the stem to have RHR in manual, changed order of answers. SAT 5/09/2007
2.
3. Psychometric Flaws

4. Job Content Flaws

5. Other 6.
7. Q# LOK LCD
(F/H) (1-5) Stem ICues T/F Cred. Partial Job-Minutia
1 Back-Q=
SRO U/E/ Explanation Focus Dist. Link units ward K/A Only S 3 F 2 X E 005K3.07 Question appears to meet the K/A. What is the normal level of the refueling cavity when refueling. Is 25 feet greater than the normal level. I so then distractor A is not credible. (Fundamental Level) NEW 4/23/2007 Changed level in stem and distractor A. Question S appears to be SAT. Still disagree that the question is CIA. SAT 519/2007 4 F 1 X U 006K2.01 Question appears to meet the K/A. Distractors C and D not credible. This is a major piece of equipment, and is powered from safety related power supplies (as listed) but all power supplies should be of the same voltage. This question could be enhanced by asking it at a higher level, and stating either an A or B train power was lost. BANK 4/23/2007. Changed the question to a two column format and S added another pump RHR. SAT 5/912007
1.

2.

3. Psychometric Flaws

4. Job Content Flaws

5. Other

6.

7.
Q# LOK LOD (F/H) (1-5) Stem Cues T/F Credo Partial Job-Minutia
1 Back-Q=
SRO U/EI Explanation Focus Dist. Link units ward KIA Only S 3 F 2 X E 005K3.07 Question appears to meet the KIA. What is the normal level of the refueling cavity when refueling. Is 25 feet greater than the normal level. I so then distractor A is not credible. (Fundamental Level) NEW 4/23/2007 Changed level in stem and distractor A. Question S appears to be SAT. Still disagree that the question is CIA. SAT 5/9/2007 4 F 1 X U 006K2.01 Question appears to meet the KIA. Distractors C and 0 not credible. This is a major piece of equipment, and is powered from safety related power supplies (as listed) but all power supplies should be of the same voltage. This question could be enhanced by asking it at a higher level, and stating either an A or B train power was lost. BANK 4/23/2007. Changed the question to a two column format and S added another pump RHR. SAT 5/912007
2.
3. Psychometric Flaws

4. Job Content Flaws

5. Other 6.
7. Q# LOK LOD (F/H) (1-5) Stem Cues [ T/F Cred. Partial Job-Minutia
/
Back-Q= SRO U/E/ Explanation F j Dist.
Link un[ts ward K/A Only 5 H 2 X E 006A3.07 Question appears to match K/A. RCS pressure should be hsted at about 350 psig. This is still above the value (250 psig) that the RHR pumps would start injecting into the RCS and the answer would be the same. Operationally speaking how did RCS pressure get to 500 psig? This high pressure makes B and D not credible. Modified 4/23/2007. Changed question as asked SAT 51912007 6 H 1 U 007A4.04 Question appears to match K/A. It is very simple as written. Very Little discriminatory value. The stem has a temperature of 158°F. The distractors mention a temperature of 148°F, which one is supposed to be there? Still believe that distractors A and C are not credible. BANK 4/23/2007. Table the question and ask later. Changed distractors A and C. SAT 5129I2007. 7 H 1 X U 008K1.03 Question appears to match K/A. Very simple, very Little discriminatory value. Distactors C and D are not credible. Not really modified. The stem was not changed and the answer is essentially the same. BANK 4/23/2007. Change to letdown HX. SAT 5I29I2007.
1.

2.

3. Psychometric Flaws

4. Job Content Flaws

5. Other

6.

7.
Q# LOK LOD (F/H) (1-5) Stem Cues T/F Credo Partial Job-Minutia
/
8ack-Q= SRO U/E/ Explanation Focus Dist. Link units ward KIA Only S 5 H 2 X E 006A3.07 Question appears to match KIA. RCS pressure should be listed at about 350 psig. This is still above the value (250 psig) that the RHR pumps would start injecting into the RCS and the answer would be the same. Operationally speaking how did RCS pressure get to 500 psig? This high pressure makes Band D not credible. Modified 4/23/2007. Changed question as asked SAT 5/912007 6 H 1 U 007 A4.04 Question appears to match KIA. It is very simple as written. Very Little discriminatory value. The stem has a temperature of 158°F. The distractors mention a temperature of 148°F, which one is supposed to be there? Still believe that distractors A and C are not credible. BANK 4/23/2007. Table the question and ask later. Changed distractors A and C. SAT 5129/2007. 7 H 1 X U 008K1.03 Question appears to match KIA. Very simple, very Little discriminatory value. Distactors C and D are not credible. Not really modified. The stem was not changed and the answer is essentially the same. BANK 4/23/2007. Change to letdown HX. SAT 5/29/2007.
2.
3. Psychometric Flaws

4. Job Content Flaws

5. Other 6.
7. Q# LOK LOD
(F/H) (1-5) Stem Cues TIE Cred. Partial Job-Minutia
1 Back-Q SRO U/E/
Explanation Focus Dist. Link units ward K/A Only S 8 H 2 X E 010A3.01 Question appears to match K/A. Same comment as 2006 ST. Lucie, the pressure in the PRT will be the based on the temperature in the PRT. Will PORV tailpipe and PRT temperature be the same? BANK 4/23/2007. Will work on question. 5/9/2007 SAT 512912007. 9 H 2 X U 012K1.07 Appears to match K/A. DistractorA is not credible. Use the steam dumps will open and control Tave at (approx no load value, 557° F) And change distractor d to read the steam dumps will open and control tave at (No load value + 2°F, 559 °F). Disctractor C is not credible. The failure of a controller does not normally render the steam dumps inoperable. This is a BANK question used in several other banks. 4/23/2007. S Will change as requested wait to see change. SAT 5/9/2007
1.

2.

3. Psychometric Flaws

4. Job Content Flaws

5. Other

6.

7.
Q# LOK LaD (F/H) (1-5) Stem Cues T/F Credo Partial Job-Minutia
1 Back-Q=
SRO utEI Explanation Focus Dist. Link units ward KIA Only S 8 H 2 X E 010A3.01 Question appears to match KIA. Same comment as 2006 ST. Lucie, the pressure in the PRT will be the based on the temperature in the PRT. Will PORV tailpipe and PRT temperature be the same? BANK 4/23/2007. Will work on guestion. 5/9/2007 SAT 5129/2007. 9 H 2 X U 012K1.07 Appears to match KIA. Distractor A is not credible. Use the steam dumps will open and control Tave at (approx no load value, 557°F) And change distractor d to read the steam dumps will open and control tave at (No load value + 2°F, 559 OF). Disctractor C is not credible. The failure of a controller does not normally render the steam dumps inoperable. This is a BANK question used in several other banks. 4/23/2007. S Will change as requested wait to see change. SAT 5/912007
1. 2.
3. Psychometric Flaws

4. Job Content Flaws

5. Other 6.
7. Q# LOK LOD (F/H) (1-5) Stem lCues T/F Cred. Partial Job-Minutia
/Back-Q=
SRO U/E/ Explanation Focus
Dhst.
LJnk unlsj ward K/A Only 10 F 2 X X U 012K2.01 Not really sure question meets K/A. The K/A is asking for the knowledge of bus power supplies to the following RPS channels, components, and interconnections. (I think this may be an interconnection and will check with another examiner. Does AC supply provide control power for any breakers in the plant? If it does not then C and D are not credible. It also appears from the drawing that you sent, the A Reactor trip breaker, and the A bypass breaker get control power from the same bus, 1 HA. This would mean that the 8 reactor trip breaker would get power from the 1 HB bus. It appears the trip signal is sent from the opposite train, and the breaker cannot be closed unless the same train reactor trip breaker is open. Need further explanation. BANK 412312007 Changed A to be the correct answer, per the drawing. Answered other questions. S SAT 5I9I2007
1.

2.

3. Psychometric Flaws

4. Job Content Flaws

5. Other

6.

7.
Q# LOK LaD (F/H) (1-5) Stem Cues T/F Credo Partial Job-Minutia
1 Back-Q=
SRO u/EI Explanation Focus Dist. Link units ward KIA Only S 10 F 2 X X U 012K2.01 Not really sure question meets KIA. The KIA is asking for the knowledge of bus power supplies to the following RPS channels, components, and interconnections. (I think this may be an interconnection and will check with another examiner. Does AC supply provide control power for any breakers in the plant? If it does not then C and o are not credible. It also appears from the drawing that you sent, the A Reactor trip breaker, and the A bypass breaker get control power from the same bus, 1 HA. This would mean that the B reactor trip breaker would get power from the 1 HB bus. It appears the trip signal is sent from the opposite train, and the breaker cannot be closed unless the same train reactor trip breaker is open. Need further explanation. BANK 4/23/2007 Changed A to be the correct answer, per the drawing. Answered other questions. S SAT 5/912007
2.
3. Psychometric Flaws

4. Job Content Flaws

5. Other 6.
7. Q# LOK LOD (F/H) (1-5) Stem Cues T/F Cred. Partial Job-Minutia
/
Back-Q= SRO U/E/ Explanation Focus Dist.
Link units ward KIA Only 1 1 H 2 X X U 01 3K1.06 Does not appear to match the KIA. There was not a clear connection between the Actuation signal and the ECCS except that it actuated. (All equipment has responded to this event as designed) then a vital bus becomes de-energized. This is more of an impact of what will happen if a vital bus fails to operate. Distractors C and D are not credible, why would equipment trip after it is started? NEW 412312007 Changed stem and distractors and replaced 5902 with 5904. S SAT 519/2007 12 F 1 X U 013K3.03 Question appears to match K/A. No discriminating value. Distractors A and B not credible. BANK 4123/2007 Changed stem to make A and B credible. S SAT 5I9I2007 13 H 2 X X 022G2.4.46 Borderline K/A Match. Both distractors U A and B could be considered correct. If the B SWBP tripped both of these alarms could come in with all the valves in the correct position. This could be argued in appeal space. Distractors C and D are not credible. There are no annunciators in for this train so why would anyone pick it. NEW 4/23/2007 Continue to Work Replace 5/18/2007 SAT 512912007.
1.

2.

3. Psychometric Flaws

4. Job Content Flaws

5. Other

6.

7.
Q# LOK LOD (F/H) (1-5) Stem Cues T/F Credo Partial Job-Minutia
1 8ack-Q=
SRO U/EI Explanation Focus Dist. Link units ward KIA Only S 11 H 2 X X U 013K1.06 Does not appear to match the KIA. There was not a clear connection between the Actuation signal and the ECCS except that it actuated. (All equipment has responded to this event as designed) then a vital bus becomes de-energized. This is more of an impact of what will happen if a vital bus fails to operate. Distractors C and D are not credible, why would equipment trip after it is started? NEW 4/23/2007 Changed stem and distractors and replaced 5902 with 5904. S SAT 5/9/2007 12 F 1 X U 013K3.03 Question appears to match KIA. No discriminating value. Distractors A and B not credible. BANK 4/23/2007 Changed stem to make A and B credible. S SAT 5/912007 13 H 2 X X 022G2.4.46 Borderline KIA Match. Both distractors U A and B could be considered correct. If the B SWBP tripped both of these alarms could come in with all the valves in the correct position. This could be argued in appeal space. Distractors C and Dare not credible. There are no annunciators in for this train so why would anyone pick it. NEW 4/23/2007 Continue to Work Replace 5/18/2007 SAT 5/29/2007.
2.
3. Psychometric Flaws

4. Job Content Flaws

5. Other 6.
7. Q# LOK LOD (F/H) (1-5) Stem Cues T/F Cred. Partial Job-Minutia
1 Back-Q=
SRO U/E/ Explanation Focus
Est.
Unk urts ward K/A Only 14 F 2 X U 026K2.02 Question appears to match K/A. Distractors A and D may not credible. What voltages are these buses rated for. If the buses are not of the same voltage as the MOVs then they are not credible. I cannot tell from the material that you sent if these buses are at the same voltage. BANK 4/23/2007 Changed power supplies and placed in two column format. SAT 519/2007 15 F 2 X U 026K4.07 Not sure if question matches K/A, will get a second opinion. The question as written actually tests the interlock based on RWST level, not on sump level. Furthermore, everyone knows that this is an automatic swapover. This could be re-writen for all of them to swap automatically NEW 412312007 allow question close to K/A added A RTB failed to open to add crediblilty. Will look at column format. SAT 5/912007
1.

2.

3. Psychometric Flaws

4. Job Content Flaws

5. Other

6.

7.
Q# LOK LOD (F/H) (1-5) Stem Cues T/F Credo Partial Job-Minutia
1 Back-Q=
SRO utEI Explanation Focus Dist. Link units ward KIA Only S 14 F 2 X U 026K2.02 Question appears to match KIA. Distractors A and 0 may not credible. What voltages are these buses rated for. If the buses are not of the same voltage as the MOVs then they are not credible. I cannot tell from the material that you sent if these buses are at the same voltage. BANK 4/23/2007 Changed power supplies and placed in two column format. SAT 5/912007 15 F 2 X U 026K4.07 Not sure if question matches KIA, will get a second opinion. The question as written actually tests the interlock based on RWST level, not on sump level. Furthermore, everyone knows that this is an automatic swapover. This could be re-writen for all of them to swap automatically...... NEW 4/23/2007 allow question close to KIA added A RTB failed to open to add crediblilty. Will look at column format. SAT 5/9/2007
2.
3. Psychometric Flaws

4. Job Content Flaws

5. Other 6.
7. Q# LOK LOD
(F/H) (1-5) Stem Cues T/F Cred. Partial Job-Minutia
1 Back-Q=
SRO U/E/ Explanation Focus Dist. Link units ward K/A Only S 16 H 2 X U 039K4.06 Question sort of Matches K/A. Distractors A and C not credible. Need to make A and C more like B and D. i.e. coincidence included. 2 of 3 containment pressure indications reach 3.6 psig (this should also be higher actual setpoint is 6.35 psig. NEW 4/23/2007 S Changed A and C distractors, to make them more plausible. SAT 519/2007 17 H 1 X U 059G2.4.50 Kind of matches K/A. May not have a correct answer as written just placing the A FRV in manual will not correct the problem. The operator has to restore level back to normal. Not much discriminatory value as written. NEW 412312007 Changed all distractors SAT 5/912007 18 F 2 S 061K5.02 Question appears to match K/A. Very simple. SAT NEW 4I23I2007 SAT 519/2007
1.

2.

3. Psychometric Flaws

4. Job Content Flaws

5. Other

6.

7.
Q# LOK LOD (F/H) (1-5) Stem Cues T/F Credo Partial Job-Minutia
/
Back-Q= SRO U/E/ Explanation Focus Dis!. Link units ward KIA Only S 16 H 2 X U 039K4.06 Question sort of Matches KIA. Distractors A and C not credible. Need to make A and C more like Band D. i.e. coincidence included. 2 of 3 containment pressure indications reach 3.6 psig (this should also be higher actual setpoint is 6.35 psig. NEW 4/23/2007 S Changed A and C distractors, to make them more plausible. SAT 5/9/2007 17 H 1 X U 059G2.4.50 Kind of matches KIA. May not have a correct answer as written just placing the A FRV in manual will not correct the problem. The operator has to restore level back to normal. Not much discriminatory value as written. NEW 4/23/2007 Changed all distractors SAT 5/9/2007 18 F 2 S 061 K5.02 Question appears to match KIA. Very simple. SAT NEW 4/23/2007 SAT 5/912007
2.
3. Psychometric Flaws

4. Job Content Flaws

5. Other 6.
7. Q# LOK LOD
(F/H) (1-5) Stem Cues TIE Cred. Partial Job-Minutia
1 Back-Q=
SRO U/El Explanation urtswardK/A Only
19 F 2 E 062A1.03 Question appears to match K/A. Move the A DIG is tagged out to the second bullet. Is there any other instrumentation that could be affected. We have tested on the ESFLS on this examination and the previous. Not sure that this will be discriminatory. Fundamental Level question BANK 412312007 Made changes to stem LOOK at Later after exam is complete. Check Again 5I9I2007 20 F 2 X E 062A3.04 Question appears to match K/A. Distractors C and D do not appear to be credible. Since Vital safeguards power is always available during a loss of one train of AC power scenario these distractors would be discounted immediately. At least one other distractor should have a battery source in it. This Is a Fundamental Level Question. BANK 412412007 Made changes to all distractors except A. Seems to make C and D more plausible. Check when Complete. SAT 5/9/2007
1.

2.

3. Psychometric Flaws

4. Job Content Flaws

5. Other

6.

7.
Q# LOK LOD (F/H) (1-5) Stem Cues T/F Credo Partial Job-Minutia
/
Back-Q= SRO U/E/ Explanation Focus Dist. Link units ward K/A Only S 19 F 2 E 062A1.03 Question appears to match KIA. Move the A DIG is tagged out to the second bullet. Is there any other instrumentation that could be affected. We have tested on the ESFLS on this examination and the previous. Not sure that this will be discriminatory. Fundamental Level question BANK 4/23/2007 Made changes to stem LOOK at Later after exam is complete. Check Again 5/912007 20 F 2 X E 062A3.04 Question appears to match KIA. Distractors C and D do not appear to be credible. Since Vital safeguards power is always available during a loss of one train of AC power scenario these distractors would be discounted immediately. At least one other distractor should have a battery source in it. This Is a Fundamental Level Question. BANK 4/24/2007 Made changes to all distractors except A. Seems to make C and D more plausible. Check when Complete. SAT 5/9/2007
1. 2.
3. Psychometric Flaws

4. Job Content Flaws

5. Other 6.
7. Q# LOK LOD
(F/H) (1-5) Stem Cues T/F Cred. Partial Job-Minutia
1 Back-Q SRO U/E/
Explanation Focus
Dist.
Unk urts ward K/A Only 21 F 2 X U 0632.4.4 This question kind of matches K/A. Not sure if all these items are credible Main feed booster pumps and pressurizer sprays do not appear to be credible. This is a fundamental level question. NEW 412312007 Agree to disagree Look at later More Feed back to Licensee. 5/18/2007 Per BC allow questiOn as is but it is memory level. SAT 05130/2007 22 F 2 X E 064A1.05 Question appears to match K/A. Distractor C is not credible, the fan would be running all the time in South Carolina. Use a number like 72 or 75 degrees. NEW 4/23/2007 Changed to 72 Sat. SAT 5/9/2007 23 H 2 S 064K1.01 Question appears to match K/A. BANK 4/24/2007 2005 Harris Believe that this Higher level
1.

2.

3. Psychometric Flaws

4. Job Content Flaws

5. Other

6.

7.
Q# LOK LOD (F/H) (1-5) Stem Cues T/F Credo Partial Job-Minutia
1 Back-Q=
SRO U/EI Explanation Focus Dist. Link units ward KIA Only S 21 F 2 X U 0632.4.4 This question kind of matches KIA. Not sure if all these items are credible Main feed booster pumps and pressurizer sprays do not appear to be credible. This is a fundamental level question. NEW 4/23/2007 Agree to disagree Look at later More Feed back to Licensee. 5/18/2007 Per BC allow question as is but it is memory level. SAT 05/30/2007 22 F 2 X E 064A1.05 Question appears to match KIA. Distractor C is not credible, the fan would be running all the time in South Carolina. Use a number like 72 or 75 degrees. NEW 4/23/2007 Changed to 72 Sat. SAT 5/912007 23 H 2 S 064K1.01 Question appears to match KIA. BANK 4/24/2007 2005 Harris Believe that this Higher level
1. 2.
3. Psychometric Flaws

4. Job Content Flaws

5. Other 6.
7. Q# LOK LOD
(F/H) (1-5) Stem Cues T/F Cred. Partial Job-Minutia
1 Back-Q=
SRO U/E/ Explanation Focus
Dhst.
Unk unfts ward K/A Only s 24 F 2 X E 073A4.01 Question appears to match K/A. Change Distractor D to read RM-L5 or RM-L9. BANK 412412007 Made changes as requested. SAT 5I9!2007 25 F 2 X E 073K1.01 Question appears to match K/A. Statement Given the following plant conditions: and listing four fans does not make sense. Do you mean to say these fans are in operation? Change stem to read Which one of the following describes the operation of XFN-30 A (B) and XFN-32 A(B) upon receipt of an alarm on RMA-1. 412412007 Made changes as requested. SAT 51912007
1.

2.

3. Psychometric Flaws

4. Job Content Flaws

5. Other

6.

7.
Q# LOK LOD (F/H) (1-5) Stem Cues T/F Credo Partial Job-Minutia
1 Back-Q=
SRO U/EI Explanation Focus Dist. Link units ward KIA Only S 24 F 2 X E 073A4.01 Question appears to match KIA. Change Distractor D to read RM-L5 or RM-L9. BANK 4/24/2007 Made changes as requested. SAT 5/912007 25 F 2 X E 073K1.01 Question appears to match KIA. Statement Given the following plant conditions: and listing four fans does not make sense. Do you mean to say these fans are in operation? Change stem to read Which one of the following describes the operation of XFN-30 A (8) and XFN-32 A(8) upon receipt of an alarm on RMA-1. 4/24/2007 Made changes as requested. SAT 5/912007
2.
3. Psychometric Flaws

4. JobContent Flaws

5. Other 6.
7. Q# LOK LOD
(F/H) (1-5) Stem ICues T/F Cred. Partial Job-Minutia
/
Back-Q= SRO U/E/ Explanation Focus Dist. Link units ward K/A Only 26 H 2 X X U 076K3.05 Question kind of matches K/A. The stem states that RHR train A is in service, but the responses all state that all RHR system temperatures are going up. Are two trains of RHR always in service? Would it still be prudent to perform actions of AOP-1 17.1 in conjunction with loss of RHR? As written very little discriminatory value. In appeal space Distractor A could be argued correct. NEW 4/2412007 Work on later 5I9/2007 SAT 5/29/2007. 27 F 2 S 078K2.02 Question appears to match K/A. Is the supplemental air compressor the emergency air compressor? BANK 412412007 SAT 5I9I2007 28 H 2 X X X U 103A2.03 Question appears to match K/A. Teaching in stem (stating that these are containment Isolation valves). Although the stem also asks for the minimum action, distractor B could also be argued as correct. Suggest something like, Both phase A actuation switches must be placed in the actuate position. NEW 4I24I2007. SAT 5/9I2007
1.

2.

3. Psychometric Flaws

4. Job'Content Flaws

5. Other

6.

7.
Q# LOK LOD (F/H) (1-5) Stem Cues T/F Credo Partial Job-Minutia
1 8ack-Q=
SRO U/EI Explanation Focus Dis!. Link units ward KIA Only S 26 H 2 X X U 076K3.05 Question kind of matches KIA. The stem states that RHR train A is in service, but the responses all state that all RHR system temperatures are going up. Are two trains of RHR always in service? Would it still be prudent to perform actions of AOP-117.1 in conjunction with loss of RHR? As written very little discriminatory value. In appeal space Distractor A could be argued correct. NEW 4/24/2007 Work on later 5/912007 SAT 5129/2007. 27 F 2 S 078K2.02 Question appears to match KIA. Is the supplemental air compressor the emergency air compressor? BANK 4/24/2007 SAT 5/912007 28 H 2 X X X U 103A2.03 Question appears to match KIA. Teaching in stem (stating that these are containment Isolation valves). Although the stem also asks for the minimum action, distractor B could also be argued as correct. Suggest something like, Both phase A actuation switches must be placed in the actuate position. NEW 4/24/2007. SAT 5/912007
2.
3. Psychometric Flaws

4. Job Content Flaws

5. Other 6.
7. Q# LOK LOD
(F/H) (1-5) Stem Cues T/F Cred. Partial Job-Minutia]
1 Back-Q=
SRO U/E/ Explanation Focus
Dist. Unk ward K/A Only 29 F 1 U 002K3.03 Question appears to match K/A. Very Little discriminatory value. NEW 4/2412007 S Discussed made changes SAT 519I2007 30 H 2 S 011 K6.03 Question appears to match K/A. Lets make sure that a 30% load rejection will not lift the PORVs. NEW 4I24I2007 SAT 5I912007 Much disscussion on PORVs all/2 or 1. 31 H 2 X X U 017A1.01 Question appears to match K/A. Teaching in stem list the name of PT-402 and PT-403. The applicant can determine the train. Is PT 455A located in the control room? The way the distractors are now the applicant need only figure out one of the core exit temperatures and can answer the question. Two distractors should have 557 and 560 in them. Modified 4I24/2007 SAT 5/9I2007 32 F 2 E 027K5.01 Question appears to match K/A. The figure that you provided shows the discharge of the RB Charcoal clean-up systems discharging to the RB atmosphere but the filters appear to be on the suction of the fans. NEW 4I24I2007 SAT 5I9I2007
1.

2.

3. Psychometric Flaws

4. Job Content Flaws

5. Other

6.

7.
Q# LOK LOD (F/H) (1-5) Stem Cues T/F Credo Partial Job-Minutia
1 Back-Q=
SRO U/EI Explanation Focus Dist. Link units ward KIA Only S 29 F 1 U 002K3.03 Question appears to match KIA. Very Little discriminatory value. NEW 4/24/2007 S Discussed made changes SAT 5/912007 30 H 2 S 011 K6.03 Question appears to match KIA. Lets make sure that a 30% load rejection will not lift the PORVs. NEW 4/24/2007 SAT 5/912007 Much disscussion on PORVs all/2 or
1.
31 H 2 X X U 017A1.01 Question appears to match KIA. Teaching in stem list the name of PT-402 and PT-403. The applicant can determine the train. Is PT-455A located in the control room? The way the distractors are now the applicant need only figure out one of the core exit temperatures and can answer the question. Two distractors should have 557 and 560 in them. Modified 4/24/2007 SAT 5/912007 32 F 2 E 027K5.01 Question appears to match KIA. The figure that you provided shows the discharge of the RB Charcoal clean-up systems discharging to the RB atmosphere but the filters appear to be on the suction of the fans. NEW 4/24/2007 SAT 5/912007
2.
3. Psychometric Flaws

4. Job Content Flaws

5. Other 6.
7. Q# LOK LOD
(F/H) (1-5) Stem Cues T/F Cred. Partial Job-Minutia
1 Back-Q SRO U/E/
Explanation Focus Dist. Link units ward K/A Only S 33 F 2 X U 028K6.O1 Question appears to match K/A. Distractor D is not credible. Distractor B the second H2 concentration should be 6% (explosive begins at 8%, and the lesson material designates that above 6% recombiner operation could trigger a hydrogen burn. BANK 412412007 2007 SEQ/Robinson/lP Made changes as requested check after the review is complete. 34 F 2 E 033K4.04 Question appears to match K/A. Will the running SFP cooling pump trip if actual level gets to 4606? If it will them A could be argued correct. NEW 4I24I2007 Fix distractor D. Otherwise SAT 519I2007 35 F 2 X U 035K5.03 Question appears to match K/A. The question asks how to avoid operational implications not the knowledge of BANK 4I24/2007 Work on later 5I9/2007 SAT 5/29/2007.
1.

2.

3. Psychometric Flaws

4. Job Content Flaws

5. Other

6.

7.
Q# LOK LOD (F/H) (1-5) Stem Cues T/F Credo Partial Job-Minutia
1 Back-Q=
SRO utEI Explanation Focus Dist. Link units ward KIA Only S 33 F 2 X U 028K6.01 Question appears to match KIA. Distractor 0 is not credible. Distractor B the second H2 concentration should be 6% (explosive begins at 8%, and the lesson material designates that above 6% recombiner operation could trigger a hydrogen burn. BANK 4/24/2007 2007 SEQ/Robinson/lP Made changes as requested check after the review is complete. 34 F 2 E 033K4.04 Question appears to match KIA. Will the running SFP cooling pump trip if actual level gets to 460'6"? If it will them A could be argued correct. NEW 4/24/2007 Fix distractor D. Otherwise SAT 5/9/2007 35 F 2 X U 035K5.03 Question appears to match KIA. The question asks how to avoid operational implications not the knowledge of BANK 4/24/2007 Work on later 5/912007 SAT 5129/2007.
2.
3. Psychometric Flaws

4. Job Content Flaws

5. Other 6.
7. Q# LOK LOD
(F/H) (1-5) Stem Cues T/F Cred. Partial Job-Minutia
1 Back-Q=
SRO U/E/ Explanation Focus Dist. Link units ward K/A Only S 36 H 2 X U 015A2.02 (Changed from 041A2.02) 401-4 needs to be fixed. Question appears to match K/A. Distractors A and C are not credible. Why would I repair channel N-35 if N-36 is the channel with the problem. Question needs repair. BANK 4/24/2007 S Made changes as requested SAT 519/2007 37 F 2 X U 072K4.03 Question does not match the K/A. This question matches K4.01, containment ventilation, not plant ventilation. Need another question that deals with plant ventilation. This is the only system that uses an ARM and has an interlock, will allow the use of the question. S NEW 412412007 SAT 519/2007 38 H 2 E 086A2.01 Question appears to match the K/A. Need to add is before running on distractors A and B. BANK 4I24I2007 S Made changes as requested. SAT 5/9/2007 39 F 2 E 007EK3.01 Question appears to match the K/A. All of these statements are true, only one is listed as basis. Need to ensure that these others can be not appealed as correct. BANK 4I24I2007 Replace Question 5/09/2007 Replaced question SAT 5/29/2007.
1.

2.

3. Psychometric Flaws

4. Job Content Flaws

5. Other

6.

7.
Q# LOK LOD (F/H) (1-5) Stem Cues T/F Credo Partial Job-Minutia
/
8ack-Q= SRO U/E/ Explanation Focus Dist. Link units ward KIA Only S 36 H 2 X U 015A2.02 (Changed from 041A2.02) 401-4 needs to be fixed. Question appears to match KIA. Distractors A and C are not credible. Why would I repair channel N-35 if N-36 is the channel with the problem. Question needs repair. BANK 4/24/2007 S Made changes as requested SAT 5/912007 37 F 2 X U 072K4.03 Question does not match the KIA. This question matches K4.01, containment ventilation, not plant ventilation. Need another question that deals with plant ventilation. This is the only system that uses an ARM and has an interlock, will allow the use of the question. S NEW 4/24/2007 SAT 5/912007 38 H 2 E 086A2.01 Question appears to match the KIA. Need to add "is" before running on distractors A and B. BANK 4/24/2007 S Made changes as requested. SAT 5/912007 39 F 2 E 007EK3.01 Question appears to match the KIA. All of these statements are true, only one is listed as basis. Need to ensure that these others can be not appealed as correct. BANK 4/24/2007 Replace Question 5/09/2007 Replaced question SAT 5/29/2007.
2.
3. Psychometric Flaws

4. Job Content Flaws

5. Other 6.
7. Q# LOK LOD (F/H) (1-5) Stem ICues T/F Cred. Partial Job-Minutia
/
Back-Q= SRO U/E/ Explanation
Focus
DLst. Unk uruts ward K/A 01y S 40 H 1 U 008AK2.01 Question appears to match the K/A. Distractor B is not credible. This question was used on the Harris, Robinson, and also on the Last Summer Retake. No discriminating value BANK 4124/2007 Will look in changing question. 5I09I2007 SAT 5/29/2007. 41 H 2 X X X X U OO9EK1.02 Question appears to match K/A. This is a backwards logic question. Need to ask it in a more forward way. Normally one just verifies that subcooling is sat prior to securing the charging pumps. Why was a value of 1300 psia chosen, it is not in the stem of the question at all. If the applicant chose 1335 and subtracted 15 psi they still would not arrive at these numbers. Also having the minimum subcooling in the stem is teaching. The values on this question also are the same as the values on question RO 31. NEW 4124/2007 Replace Question 5I09I2007 Reworked question SAT 5I29I2007. 42 H 1 X U 01 1 EK2.02 Question appears to match K/A. No discriminatory value. This question is also on another exam. BANK 412412007 Replace Question 5/09I2007 Replcaced SAT 5I29I2007.
1.

2.

3. Psychometric Flaws

4. Job Content Flaws

5. Other

6.

7.
Q# LOK LOD (F/H) (1-5) Stem Cues T/F Credo Partial Job-Minutia
1 Back-Q=
SRO u/EI Explanation Focus Dist. Link units ward KIA Only S 40 H 1 U 008AK2.01 Question appears to match the KIA. Distractor B is not credible. This question was used on the Harris, Robinson, and also on the Last Summer Retake. No discriminating value BANK 4/24/2007 Will look in changing question. 5/09/2007 SAT 5129/2007. 41 H 2 X X X X U 009EK1.02 Question appears to match KIA. This is a backwards logic question. Need to ask it in a more forward way. Normally one just verifies that subcooling is sat prior to securing the charging pumps. Why was a value of 1300 psia chosen, it is not in the stem of the question at all. If the applicant chose 1335 and subtracted 15 psi they still would not arrive at these numbers. Also having the minimum subcooling in the stem is teaching. The values on this question also are the same as the values on question RO 31. NEW 4/24/2007 Replace Question 5/09/2007 Reworked question SAT 5129/2007. 42 H 1 X U 011 EK2.02 Question appears to match KIA. No discriminatory value. This question is also on another exam. BANK 4/24/2007 Replace Question 5/09/2007 Replcaced SAT 5/29/2007.
2.
3. Psychometric Flaws

4. Job Content Flaws

5. Other 6.
7. Q# LOK LOD
(F/H) (1-5) Stem Cues T/F Cred. Partial Job-Minutia
/
Back-Q= SRO U/E/ Explanation Focus Dist. Link units ward K/A Only S 43 H 1 U 015AK2.08 Question appears to match the KIA. It was modified from the 2006 retake, the item that was changed was the part of the pump that s overheating. Not sure that the question will have discriminatory value. MOD 412412007. Changed to 8 % Modified SAT 5I1 012007 44 H 1 X X U 022AK1.02 Question appears to match the K/A. Distractors C and D are not credible. What is normal charging flow. With 122 fully open and charging flow only 80 gpm why would anyone choose C and D, you already stated in the stem that flow is going down. NEW 2/24/2007 Work on two distractors. Removed stuff out of stem. SAT 511012007 Licensee still did not like question. Replaced Question SAT 5/29/2007. 45 L 2 E 027AK3.01 Question appears to match the K/A. Distractors A, C and D have some wording issues. In C you mention loss of pressure in the pressurizer... in D you just mention the pressure reduction, and in A you mention RCS pressure. While it is true that all pressures are being affected, this should be mentioned the same way each time. BANK 4I24/2007 Changed the question Replaced Question SAT 5/10/2007
1.

2.

3. Psychometric Flaws

4. Job Content Flaws

5. Other

6.

7.
Q# LOK LOD (F/H) (1-5) Stem Cues T/F Credo Partial Job-Minutia
/
8ack-Q= SRO utE/ Explanation Focus Dist. Link units ward KIA Only S 43 H 1 U 015AK2.08 Question appears to match the KIA. It was modified from the 2006 retake, the item that was changed was the part of the pump that is overheating. Not sure that the question will have discriminatory value. MOD 4/24/2007. Changed to 8 % Modified SAT 5/10/2007 44 H 1 X X U 022AK1.02 Question appears to match the KIA. Distractors C and D are not credible. What is normal charging flow. With 122 fully open and charging flow only 80 gpm why would anyone choose C and D, you already stated in the stem that flow is going down. NEW 2/24/2007 Work on two distractors. Removed stuff out of stem. SAT 5/10/2007 Licensee still did not like question. Replaced Question SAT 5/29/2007. 45 L 2 E 027 AK3.01 Question appears to match the KIA. Distractors A, C and D have some wording issues. InC you mention loss of pressure in the pressurizer... in D you just mention the pressure reduction, and in A you mention RCS pressure. While it is true that all pressures are being affected, this should be mentioned the same way each time. BANK 4/24/2007 Changed the question Replaced Question SAT 5/10/2007
2.
3. Psychometric Flaws

4. Job Content Flaws

5. Other 6.
7. Q# LOK LOD
(F/H) (1-5) Stem Cues T/F Cred. IPartial Job-Minutia
1 Back-0=
SRO U/E/ Explanation Focus
Dt.
Unk uns ward K/A Only S 46 H 1 U 029EK2.06 Question appears to match K/A. This question was also on the 2006 Retake, although it was asked in a slightly different format. ( K/A 007EK2.02) It has little discriminatory value. BANK 412412007 Refer to Boss SAT 511012007 Per the Boss this is a repeat question and should be replaced. 0513012007 New K/A. EK3.09 Replaced Question. SAT 617/2007 47 H 2 X E 038G2.2.22 Question appears to match K/A. Is there a limit for total S/G leakage, if there is D could use that number and D would be a better distractor. Some of the documentation included with this question involved natural circulation conditions, I dont know why it was included.? S BANK 4I24I2007 Discussed limits Question SAT SAT 5/1 012007 48 H 2 S 054AK1.01 Question appears to match K/A. BANK 412412007 Songs 2006 otherwise sat SAT 5I10I2007 49 F 2 X U 055EA1.07 Question appears to match K/A. Distractors C and D are not credible. If the plant did not have an SI, why would the SI signal need to be reset. NEW 412412007 S Changed distractors C and D SAT Question SAT 5110/2007
1.

2.

3. Psychometric Flaws

4. Job Content Flaws

5. Other

6.

7.
Q# LOK LOD (F/H) (1-5) Stem Cues T/F Credo Partial Job-Minutia
1 8ack-Q=
SRO U/EI Explanation Focus . Dis!. Link units ward KIA Only S 46 H 1 U 029EK2.06 Question appears to match KJA. This question was also on the 2006 Retake, although it was asked in a slightly different format. ( KJA 007EK2.02) It has little discriminatory value. BANK 4/24/2007 Refer to Boss SAT 5/10/2007 Per the Boss this is a repeat question and should be replaced. 05/30/2007 New KIA. EK3.09 Replaced Question. SAT 6/7/2007 47 H 2 X E 038G2.2.22 Question appears to match KJA. Is there a limit for total S/G leakage, if there is D could use that number and D would be a better distractor. Some of the documentation included with this question involved natural circulation conditions, I don't know why it was included.? S BANK 4/24/2007 Discussed limits Question SAT SAT 5/10/2007 48 H 2 S 054AK1.01 Question appears to match KJA. BANK 4/24/2007 Songs 2006 otherwise sat SAT 5/10/2007 49 F 2 X U 055EA 1.07 Question appears to match KJA. Distractors C and D are not credible. If the plant did not have an SI, why would the SI signal need to be reset. NEW 4/24/2007 S Changed distractors C and D SAT Question SAT 5/10/2007
2.
3. Psychometric Flaws

4. Job Content Flaws

5. Other 6.
7. Q# LOK LOD (F/H) (1-5) Stem Cues TIF Cred. Partial Job-Minutia TTBack-Q= SRO U/E/ Explanation Focus
Dkst.
Link unitsj ward K/A Only s 50 F 1 X U 056AA2.50 Question appears to match the K/A. No discriminatory value. Distractor C is asking if the voltage is low, and voltage is above the 6.9KV rating of the machine. NEW 412412007 Worked on this Question SAT 511012007 51 H 2 E 057AA2.19 Question appears to match K/A. Why do you have to tell the applicant that a loss of APN 5902 has occurred? Just tell them Inverter XIT 5902 output breaker trips open. BANK 412412007. SAT Question SAT 5I10I2007 52 H 1+ E 058AA2.02 Question appears to match K/A. How different would the indications be if this were B train? This is another bank question and with the high number of questions with discriminatory value issues it would be nice to see a different train than those listed in the bank. BANK 4I24I2007. Made changes to B train and changed several distractors Question SAT SAT 511012007 53 F 2 X U 065AK3.04 Question appears to match K/A. Distractors C and D are not credible. This valve does not close. If you used a valve that did isolate, and used these numeric values then they would be acceptable. Modified 4/2512007 On Summer 2005 Changed distractors C and D. S SAT Question SAT 5110/2007
1.

2.

3. Psychometric Flaws

4. Job Content Flaws

5. Other

6.

7.
Q# LOK LOD (F/H) (1-5) Stem Cues T/F Credo Partial Job-Minutia
1 Back-Q=
SRO U/EI Explanation Focus Dis!. Link units ward KIA Only S 50 F 1 X U 056M2.50 Question appears to match the KIA. No discriminatory value. Distractor C is asking if the voltage is low, and voltage is above the 6.9KV rating of the machine. NEW 4/24/2007 Worked on this Question SAT 5/10/2007 51 H 2 E 057 M2.19 Question appears to match KIA. Why do you have to tell the applicant that a loss of APN-5902 has occurred? Just tell them Inverter XIT 5902 output breaker trips open. BANK 4/24/2007. SAT Question SAT 5/10/2007 52 H 1+ E 058M2.02 Question appears to match KIA. How different would the indications be if this were B train? This is another bank question and with the high number of questions with discriminatory value issues it would be nice to see a different train than those listed in the bank. BANK 4/24/2007. Made changes to B train and changed several distractors Question SAT SAT 5/10/2007 53 F 2 X U 065AK3.04 Question appears to match KIA. Distractors C and 0 are not credible. This valve does not close. If you used a valve that did isolate, and used these numeric values then they would be acceptable. Modified 4/25/2007 On Summer 2005 Changed distractors C and D. S SAT Question SAT 5/10/2007
2.
3. Psychometric Flaws

4. Job Content Flaws

5. Other 6.
7. Q# LOK LOD
(F/H) (1-5) Stem Cues T/F Cred. Partial Job-Minutia
1 Back-Q SRO U/E/
Explanation Focus Dist. Link units ward K/A Only S 54 F 1 X U WEO4 EK1.2 Question appears to match K/A. Distractors B and D are not credible. BANK 412512007. Replace or fix Question SAT 511012007 Reworked question SAT 512912007. 55 F I X U WE1 1 EKI.1 Question appears to match K/A. The only distractor that has taking a suction from the RWST is the correct answer, it is also the only distractor that states verbatim what the procedure step states, so why would anyone pick one of the other distractors. Distractors A, B, C are not credible. This is a fundamental level question. BANK 4I25I2007. Continue to work SAT 511 0I2007 Licensee made Format changes SAT 5129/2007. 56 F X X U WE12G2.2.25 Question sort of matches K/A. Distractors C and D not credible. If B is correct then A is also correct. This is simply the basis of the RCS cooldown T/S, and applies for any cooldown event. This question is written at the Fundamental level. NEW 412512007. Continue to work SAT 511012007
1.

2.

3. Psychometric Flaws

4. Job Content Flaws

5. Other

6.

7.
Q# LOK LOD (F/H) (1-5) Stem Cues T/F Credo Partial Job-Minutia
1 Back-Q=
SRO U/EI Explanation Focus Dist. Link units ward KIA Only S 54 F 1 X U WE04 EK1.2 Question appears to match KIA. Distractors Band D are not credible. BANK 4/25/2007. Replace or fix Question SAT 5/10/2007 Reworked question SAT 5129/2007. 55 F 1 X U WE11 EK1.1 Question appears to match KIA. The only distractor that has "taking a suction from the RWSr is the correct answer, it is also the only distractor that states verbatim what the procedure step states, so why would anyone pick one of the other distractors. Distractors A, B, C are not credible. This is a fundamental level question. BANK 4/25/2007. Continue to work SAT 5/10/2007 Licensee made Format changes SAT 5129/2007. 56 F X X U WE12G2.2.25 Question sort of matches KIA. Distractors C and D not credible. If B is correct then A is also correct. This is simply the basis of the RCS cooldown TIS, and applies for any cooldown event. This question is written at the Fundamental level. NEW 4/25/2007. Continue to work SAT 5/10/2007
2.
3. Psychometric Flaws

4. Job Content Flaws

5. Other 6.
7. Q# LOK LOD (F/H) (1-5) Stem Cues T/F JCred. Partial Job-Minutia
1 Back-0=
SRO U/E/ Explanation Focus Dist. Link units ward K/A Only S 57 F 1 X X U OO1AA2.04 Kind of matches K/A. This is a backwards way of meeting it. The K/A ask for the ability to determine and interpret the following as they apply to the Continuous rod withdrawal: Reactor power and its trend. You are asking what will happen to other parameters that change as a result of the temperature rise, but nothing is mentioned about reactor power. If Imp. Loops are in then B would also remain the same. At what point in core life is this happening? You are assuming in the stem that the unit is online but it is not mentioned. An applicant could assume that this occurred during a startup. This question is also written at the Fundamental level. NEW 4I2512007. Made changes SAT 511012007 58 H 2 X X U 028AK3.03 Question appears to match K/A. C and D could be argued as correct answers. This question is also very similar to Question 40. Parts of this question will help answer it and parts of it will help answer this one. BANK 4I25I2007. Will replace this Question Continue to work 511012007 Check after word chopping. 5I29I2007. SAT 61712007
1.

2.

3. Psychometric Flaws

4. Job Content Flaws

5. Other

6.

7.
Q# LOK LOD (F/H) (1-5) Stem Cues T/F Credo Partial Job-Minutia
1 Back-Q=
SRO U/EI Explanation Focus Dist. Link units ward KIA Only S 57 F 1 X X U 001AA2.04 Kind of matches KIA. This is a backwards way of meeting it. The KIA ask for the ability to determine and interpret the following as they apply to the Continuous rod withdrawal: Reactor power and its trend. You are asking what will happen to other parameters that change as a result of the temperature rise, but nothing is mentioned about reactor power. If Imp. Loops are in then B would also remain the same. At what point in core life is this happening? You are assuming in the stem that the unit is online but it is not mentioned. An applicant could assume that this occurred during a startup. This question is also written at the Fundamental level. NEW 4/25/2007. Made changes SAT 5/10/2007 58 H 2 X X U 028AK3.03 Question appears to match KIA. C and D could be argued as correct answers. This question is also very similar to Question 40. Parts of this question will help answer it and parts of it will help answer this one. BANK 4/25/2007. Will replace this Question Continue to work 5/10/2007 Check after word chopping. 5/29/2007. SAT 6/712007
2.
3. Psychometric Flaws

4. Job Content Flaws

5. Other 6.
7. Q# LOK LOD (F/H) (1-5) Stem Cues T/F Cred. Partial Job-Minutia
1 Back-Q=
SRO U/E/ Explanation Focus Dist. Link units ward K/A Only S 59 F 2 X U 036AA1.04 Question kind of matches K/A. A0P123.3 does not direct the placing of the fuel assembly. How would any of the others be considered wrong in this case? BANK 412512007. Replace Question Look at new KIA.Continue to work 511012007 Replaced K/A 036AK3.02 Question SAT 5/2912007. 60 F 2 X U 051AK3.01 Question appears to match K/A. Distractors A and B are not plausible. Why would C-9 or 0-16 arm the atmospheric dumps and Relief Valves? BANK 4I25I2007. Made changes as requested SAT 5I10/2007 61 H 2 X E WEO3G2.1.33 Question appears to match K/A. Why does the stem state First Exceeded this would imply that distractor D is not credible. I think that 0900-1000 is the only time that the T/S limit was exceeded. There should also be a time after 1000 for psychometric reasons. BANK 412512007. SEQ Discuss Enhancements 511 8I2007 SAT 5I29I2007.
1.

2.

3. Psychometric Flaws

4. Job Content Flaws

5. Other

6.

7.
Q# LOK LaD (F/H) (1-5) Stem Cues T/F Credo Partial Job-Minutia
1 8ack-Q=
SRO utEI Explanation Focus Dist. Link units ward KIA Only S 59 F 2 X U 036AA1.04 Question kind of matches KIA. AOP123.3 does not direct the placing of the fuel assembly. How would any of the others be considered wrong in this case? BANK 4/25/2007. Replace Question Look at new KlA.Continue to work 5/10/2007 Replaced KIA 036AK3.02 Question SAT 5/29/2007. 60 F 2 X U 051AK3.01 Question appears to match KIA. Distractors A and B are not plausible. Why would C-9 or C-16 arm the atmospheric dumps and Relief Valves? BANK 4/25/2007. Made changes as requested SAT 5/10/2007 61 H 2 X E WE03G2.1.33 Question appears to match KIA. Why does the stem state "First Exceeded" this would imply that distractor D isnot credible. I think that 0900-1000 is the only time that the TIS limit was exceeded. There should also be a time after 1000 for psychometric reasons. BANK 4/25/2007. SEQ Discuss Enhancements 511812007 SAT 5/29/2007.
2.
3. Psychometric Flaws

4. Job Content Flaws

5. Other 6.
7. Q# LOK LOD
(F/H) (1-5) Stem Cues T/F Cred. Partial Job-Minutia
1 Back-Q=
SRO U/E/ Explanation Focus Dist. Link units ward K/A Only S 62 F 2 X X E WEO6EK2.2 Kind of matches K/A. Do not agree with the reason that C is incorrect, if the RCS becomes pressurized enough for LPSI , and the temperature of the RCS cold legs is less thanl95°F you would still go to P.1 after completion of this procedure. BANK 412512007. North Anna SAT 5/2912007. 63 H 2 X X U WEO8EA2.1 Question appears to match K/A. Distractors C and D are not credible, RB Flooding is a yellow path, there is not a red path on containment for flooding. The critical safety functions are listed in order of priority this is a cue to the applicants. BANK 4/2512007. Changed question to orange and red paths SAT 511012007 64 H 2 X U WEIOG2.1.23 Question really does not match the K/A. The procedure entered is for a natural Circulation cooldown. The stem states that RVLIS is not available. It appears that V C Summer does not have a natural circulation cooldown with out RVLIS procedure. There should be something in this procedure that deals with a loss of RVLIS and this is what the question should directed towards. BANK 412512007. Changed several conditions in stem and distractors.SAT 5/1012007 Changed question again SAT 5/29/2007.
1.

2.

3. Psychometric Flaws

4. Job Content Flaws

5. Other

6.

7.
Q# LOK LOD (F/H) (1-5) Stem Cues T/F Credo Partial Job-Minutia
1 8ack-Q=
SRO utEI Explanation Focus Dis!. Link units ward KIA Only S 62 F 2 X X E WE06EK2.2 Kind of matches KIA. Do not agree with the reason that C is incorrect, if the RCS becomes pressurized enough for LPSI, and the temperature of the RCS cold legs is less than195°F you would still go to P.1 after completion of this procedure. BANK 4/25/2007. North Anna SAT 5129/2007. 63 H 2 X X U WEOBEA2.1 Question appears to match KIA. Oistractors C and 0 are not credible, RB Flooding is a yellow path, there is not a red path on containment for flooding. The critical safety functions are listed in order of priority this is a cue to the applicants. BANK 4/25/2007. Changed question to orange and red paths SAT 5/10/2007 64 H 2 X U WE1 OG2.1.23 Question really does not match the KIA. The procedure entered is for a natural Circulation cooldown. The stem states that RVLlS is not available. It appears that V C Summer does not have a natural circulation cooldown with out RVLlS procedure. There should be something in this procedure that deals with a loss of RVLlS and this is what the question should directed towards. BANK 4/25/2007. Changed several conditions in stem and distractors.SAT 5/10/2007 Changed question again SAT 5129/2007.
2.
3. Psychometric Flaws

4. Job Content Flaws

5. Other 6.
7. Q# LOK LCD
(F/H) (1-5) Stem Cues T/F Cred. Partial Job-Minutia
1 Back-Q=
SRO U/E/ Explanation Focus Dist. Link units ward K/A Only S 65 F 2 X U WEI6EA1.3 Question appears to match K/A. Distractors C and D are not credible. There is no way that RB purge would be placed in service with high radiation in the RB. BANK 412512007. Changed stem and distractor C and D. SAT 511012007 66 H 2 E G2.1.7 Question appears to match the K/A. Distractors C and D are too wordy. C should read: An RPS setpoint has not been exceeded; Trip the Reactor, perform the immediate actions of EOP1.0, then initiate a safety Injection. D should read: An RPS setpoint has not been exceeded; Trip the Reactor, perform the immediate actions of EOP1.0, continue to implement AOP concurrently, initiate SI when Pressurizer level is less than 12%. BANK 4/25I2007. Check on final exam 5I1 812007 67 F 2 S G2.1.17 Question appears to match K/A. Why do you have examples for A,B, and C? We will discuss these. NEW 4I25I2007. 68 F 2 S G2.1.27 Question appears to match K/A. BANK 4/2512007.
1.

2.

3. Psychometric Flaws

4. Job Content Flaws

5. Other

6.

7.
Q# LOK LOD (F/H) (1-5) Stem Cues T/F Credo Partial Job-Minutia
1 Back-Q=
SRO utEI Explanation Focus Dis!. Link units ward KIA Only S 65 F 2 X U WE16EA1.3 Question appears to match KIA. Distractors C and 0 are not credible. There is no way that RB purge would be placed in service with high radiation in the RB. BANK 4/25/2007. Changed stem and distractor C and D. SAT 5/10/2007 66 H 2 E G2.1.7 Question appears to match the KIA. Distractors C and 0 are too wordy. C should read: An RP8 setpoint has not been exceeded; Trip the Reactor, perform the immediate actions of EOP1.0, then initiate a safety Injection. o should read: An RP8 setpoint has not been exceeded; Trip the Reactor, perform the immediate actions of EOP1.0, continue to implement AOP concurrently, initiate 81 when Pressurizer level is less than 12%. BANK 4/25/2007. Check on final exam 5/18/2007 67 F 2 8 G2.1.17 Question appears to match KIA. Why do you have examples for A,B, and C? We will discuss these. NEW 4125/2007. 68 F 2 8 G2:1.27 Question appears to match KIA. BANK 4/25/2007.
2.
3. Psychometric Flaws

4. Job Content Flaws

5. Other 6.
7. Q# LOK LOD
(F/H) (1-5) Stem Cues T/F Cred. IPartial Job-Minutia
1 Back-Q SRO U/E/
Explanation Focus
Dist.
Link units ward K/A Only S 69 F 2 S G2.2.24 Question appears to match K/A. BANK 4/25/2007. 70 F 2 X X U G2.2.28 RO 70 must have changed. The question submitted appears to match the K/A. I have material included that covers NIs, and some material that discusses limit switches and interlocks. The question included is on source range nuclear instruments. The correct answer states that 2 must be operable in the control room (visual) but the procedure reference REP-i 07.002 states that: Two source range channels are operable and in service with visual indication in the control room and with audible indication in the control room and reactor building. By this procedure D would be the correct answer. BANK 412512007. Licensee stated that this should be the same as technical specifications. SAT 511012007 71 F 2 X U G2.3.4 Question appears to match the K/A. The correct answer does not agree with the material provided. It states that >25 rem can be received to save a life. Therefore there is not a correct answer. BANK 4/2512007. Replace Question 511012007 Reworked to modify question.SAT 5129/2007.
1.

2.

3. Psychometric Flaws

4. Job Content Flaws

5. Other

6.

7.
Q# LOK LOD (F/H) (1-5) Stem Cues T/F Credo Partial Job-Minutia
/
Back-Q= SRO U/E/ Explanation Focus Dist. Link units ward KIA Only S 69 F 2 S G2.2.24 Question appears to match KIA. BANK 4/25/2007. 70 F 2 X X U G2.2.28 RO 70 must have changed. The question submitted appears to match the KIA. I have material incll.1ded that covers Nls, and some material that discusses limit switches and interlocks. The question included is on source range. nuclear instruments. The correct answer states that 2 must be operable in the control room (visual) but the procedure reference REP-1 07.002 states that: Two source range channels are operable and in service with visual indication in the control room and with audible indication in the control room and reactor building. By this procedure D would be the correct answer. BANK 4/25/2007. Licensee stated that this should be the same as technical specifications. SAT 5/10/2007 71 F 2 X U G2.3.4 Question appears to match the KIA. The correct answer does not agree with the material provided. It states that >25 rem can be received to save a life. Therefore there is not a correct answer. BANK 4/25/2007. Replace Question 5/10/2007 Reworked to modify question.SAT 5/29/2007.
1. 2.
3. Psychometric Flaws

4. Job Content Flaws

5. Other 6.
7. Q# LOK LOD
(F/H) (1-5) Stem Cues T/F Cred. Partial Job-Minutia
1 Back-Q SRO U/E/
Explanation Focus Dt. Lhik urts ward K/A Only S 72 F 2 X U G2.3.1 Question appears to match the K/A. Distractors C and D are not credible. Some of the distractors should be less than the correct answers. One answer should be similar to the HPP-153 section 4.7. BANK 4/25/2007. Changed distractor D.SAT 5110/2007 73 F 2 X E G2.4.9 Question appears to match the K/A. I understand that D is the second action lAW the procedure, but it is assuming that the flow reduction has already occurred. Therefore, D is not really credible. BANK 4/25/2007. Check on final exam 511812007 74 F 2 X E G2.4.29 Question appears to match the K/A. Can the emergency director and the SS be the same person? S BANK 4/25/2007. Leave as is SAT 5/10/2007 75 F 2 S G2.4.13 Question kind of matches the K/A. BANK 4/25/2007. I
1.

2.

3. Psychometric Flaws

4. Job Content Flaws

5. Other

6.

7.
Q# LOK LOD (F/H) (1-5) Stem Cues T/F Credo Partial Job-Minutia
1 Back-Q=
SRO U/EI Explanation Focus Dist. Link units ward KIA Only S 72 F 2 X U G2.3.1 Question appears to match the KIA. Distractors C and 0 are not credible. Some of the distractors should be less than the correct answers. One answer should be similar to the HPP-153 section 4.7. BANK 4/25/2007. Changed distractor D.SAT 5/10/2007 73 F 2 X E G2.4.9 Question appears to match the KIA. I understand that 0 is the second action lAW the procedure, but it is assuming that the flow reduction has already occurred. Therefore, 0 is not really credible. BANK 4/25/2007. Check on final exam 5/18/2007 74 F 2 X E G2.4.29 Question appears to match the KIA. Can the emergency director and the SS be the same person? S BANK 4/25/2007. Leave as is SAT 5/10/2007 75 F 2 S G2.4.13 Question kind of matches the KIA. BANK 4/25/2007.
ES-401, Rev. 9 Summer SRO 2007-301 2Form ES-401-9 1. 2.
3. Psychometric Flaws

4. Job Content Flaws

5. Other 6.
7. Q# LOK LOD
(F/H) (1-5) Stem Cues T/F Cred. Partial Job-Minutia
1 Back-Q SRO UIEIS Explanation Focus Dist.
Link unit ward K/A Only S H 2 X U 022AA2.02 Question appears to match K/A. Steps 76 in distractors do not match the steps in the procedure. If the applicant went to 101.1, the procedure directs the applicant to quantify the leak and then attempt to isolate. Distractor B has the operator restore charging flow, but in the procedure it is only after performing a valve lineup. As written these distractors are not credible. Answer options consist of three parts diagnosis, procedure, and action. The diagnosis and procedure elements are paired together in eaxh case, so the diagnosis is not unique. Consider the following: A. Go to AOP 1.01 Stop the operating charging pump and Isolate letdown. B. GotoAOP 1.01 Open FCV 122 as necessary and reduce letown to 45 gpm. C. GotoAOP 102.02 Stop the operating charging pump and Isolate letdown. D. GotoAOP 102.02 Reduce letdown to 45 gpm and verify the charging system valve lineup. BANK 4/25/2007 Made Changes as requested. SAT 511012007 ES-401, Rev. 9 Summer SRO 2007-301 2Form ES-401-9
1.

2.

3. Psychometric Flaws

4. Job Content Flaws

5. Other

6.

7.
Q# LOK LOD (F/H) (1-5) Stem Cues T/F Credo Partial Job-Minutia
1 8ack-Q::
SRO U/E/S Explanation Focus Dist. Link unit ward KIA Only s 11 H 2 X U 022AA2.02 Question appears to match KIA. Steps 76 in distractors do not match the steps in the procedure. If the applicant went to 101.1, the procedure directs the applicant to quantify the leak and then attempt to isolate. Distractor B has the operator restore charging flow, but in the procedure it is only after performing a valve lineup. As written these distractors are not credible. Answer options consist of three parts diagnosis, procedure, and action. The diagnosis and procedure elements are paired together in eaxh case, so the diagnosis is not unique. Consider the following: A. Go to AOP 1.01 Stop the operating charging pump and Isolate letdown. B. Go to AOP 1.01 Open FCV 122 as necessary and reduce letown to 45 gpm. C. Go to AOP 102.02 Stop the operating charging pump and Isolate letdown. D. Go to AOP 102.02 Reduce letdown to 45 gpm and verify the charging system valve lineup. BANK 4/25/2007 Made Changes as requested. SAT 5/10/2007
1. 2.
3. Psychometric Flaws

4. Job Content Flaws 5, Other 6.
7. Q# LOK LOD
(F/H) (1-5) Stem Cues T/F Cred. Partial Job-Minutia
1 Back-Q SRO U/E/S Explanation Focus Dist.
Link unit ward K/A Only S 2/ H 1 X X X U 029EA2.07 Question kind of matches K/A. Not SRO 77 knowledge, this is almost the same question that was appealed on the Retake exam. What was reactor power to begin with, how did it get to 8%? From the indications that you give unless a loss of electrical power has occurred rods are still up. Are these indications operationally valid? Question is very simple. BANK 412512007 Discuss with Boss 511 0I2007 Not SRO Only, will attempt to write a new question on breakers after entry into S.1. Also pick a backup K/A. EA2.09 selected as backup 3/ H 2 X E 038 G2.4.31 Question appears to match K/A. 78 Answer options consist of three parts, two actions and a procedure selection. The two elements in each action statement are not unique. For example if an applicant knows CPs are removed from service, then no knowledge of SG BID is required. Consider using only one action. NEW 4/25/2007 V Check on final exam 5/18/2007 SAT 5/29/2007
1.

2.

3. Psychometric Flaws

4. Job Content Flaws

5. Other

6.

7.
Q# LOK LOD (F/H) (1-5) Stem Cues T/F Credo Partial Job-Minutia
1 Back-Q=
SRO utE/S Explanation Focus Dis!. Link unit ward KIA Only s 21 H 1 X X X U 029EA2.07 Question kind of matches KIA. Not SRO 77 knowledge, this is almost the same question that was appealed on the Retake exam. What was reactor power to begin with, how did it get to 8%? From the indications that you give unless a loss of electrical power has occurred rods are still up. Are these indications operationally valid? Question is very simple. BANK 4/25/2007 Discuss with Boss 5/10/2007 Not SRO Only, will attempt to write a new question on breakers after entry into S.1. Also pick a backup KIA. EA2.09 selected as backup 31 H 2 X E 038 G2.4.31 Question appears to matGh KIA. 78 Answer options consist of three parts, two actions and a procedure selection. The two elements in each action statement are not unique. For example if an applicant knows CPs are removed from service, then no knowledge of SG BID is required. Consider using only one action. NEW 4/25/2007 Check on final exam 5/18/2007 SAT 5/29/2007
1. 2.
3. Psychometric Flaws

4. Job Content Flaws

5. Other 6.
7. Q# LOK LOD
(F/H) (1-5) Stem Cues T/F Cred. Partial Job-Minutia
1 Back-Q SRO U1EIS Explanation Focus Dist.
Link unit ward KIA Only S 4/ H 2 X U 040G2.4.50 Kind of matches the K/A. The only 79 alarm setpoint to verify is the rod stop. Why is there such a large disparity between N-44 and the rest of the power indications? Was a calculation performed that to confirm that 3% reactor power was equivalent to a 9°F decrease in Tave? Distractors A and B are not credible. Tave is lower thatn Tref. Inadvertent dilution would raise Tave. XCP-620-5-1 (Urgent Failure) can only be caused by a rod control failure. C could also be correct if someone thought the leak was large enough. Same Question on another exam. BANK 412612007 On Sequoyah Exam Continue to work on 5/10/2007 fixed 5I30I2007
1.

2.

3. Psychometric Flaws

4. Job Content Flaws

5. Other

6.

7.
Q# LOK LaD (FtH) (1-5) Stem Cues TtF Credo Partial Job-Minutia #t Back-Q= SRO utEtS Explanation Focus Dist. Link unit ward KIA Only s 41 H 2 X U 040G2.4.50 Kind of matches the KIA. The only 79 alarm setpoint to verify is the rod stop. Why is there such a large disparity between N-44 and the rest of the power indications? Was a calculation performed that to confirm that 3% reactor power was equivalent to a 9°F decrease in Tave? Distractors A and Bare not credible. Tave is lower thatn Tref. Inadvertent dilution would raise Tave. XCP-620-5-1 (Urgent Failure) can only be caused by a rod control failure. C could also be correct if someone thought the leak was large enough. Same Question on another exam. BANK 4/26/2007 On Sequoyah Exam Continue to work on 5/10/2007 fixed 5/30/2007
1. 2.
3. Psychometric Flaws

4. Job Content Flaws

5. Other 6.
7. Q# LOK LOD
(F/H) (1-5) Stem Cues T/F Cred. Partial Job-Minutia
1 Back-Q SRO U/E/S Explanation Focus Dist.
Link unit ward K/A Only S 5/ H I X X X U 055EA2.02 Question appears to match K/A. Does 80 not appear to be SRO only. Verifying Natural circulation is an RO task, and knowing the indications of a loss of all AC is also an RO task. Other items: If a loss of all AC is in progress, RCS pressure usually goes down due to seal leakage. (I know that natural circ is not in progress, but the leakage is based on pressure and will continue. I think that 20 minutes into a loss of all AC RCS pressure will not be near this high. Distractors B and D state that heat removal is being maintained...verify that Natural Circulation exists lAW... These do not appear to be credible. With system knowledge an RO could answer this question with out any procedure knowledge. BANK 412612007 Work on this Continue to work on 511012007 Made changes to question Modified. SAT 5I30I2007
1.

2.

3. Psychometric Flaws

4. Job Content Flaws

5. Other

6.

7.
Q# LOK LOD (F/H) (1-5) Stem Cues T/F Credo Partial Job-Minutia
1 8ack-Q=
SRO U/E/S Explanation Focus Dist. Link unit ward KIA Only s 51 H 1 X X X U 055EA2.02 Question appears to match KIA. Does 80 not appear to be SRO only. Verifying Natural circulation is an RO task, and knowing the indications of a loss of all AC is also an RO task. Other items: If a loss of all AC is in progress, RCS pressure usually goes down due to seal leakage. (I know that natural eirc is not in progress, but the leakage is based on pressure and will continue. I think that 20 minutes into a loss of all AC RCS pressure will not be near this high. Distractors Band D state that heat removal is being maintained... verify that Natural Circulation exists lAW... These do not appear to be credible. With system knowledge an RO could answer this question with out any procedure knowledge. BANK 4/26/2007 Work on this Continue to work on 5/10/2007 Made changes to question Modified. SAT 5/30/2007
1. 2.
3. Psychometric Flaws

4. Job Content Flaws

5. Other 6.
7. Q# LOK LOD
(F/H) (1-5) Stem Cues T/F Cred. Partial Job-Minutia
1 Back-Q=
SRO U/E/S Explanation Focus Dist. Link unit ward K/A Only 5 6/ H 2 X X X U 056G2.4.6 Question appears to match K/A. It is not 81 SRO only knowledge. Distractors C and D are not credible. With the statement ESF equipment responds as designed means that everything that was supposed to start and run did start and is running. So how can this be considered to be a loss of all AC. With CST at 14 feet, can the plant cooldown lAW EOP 1.3. There is a 29 hours soak in EOP-1.3, can this be maintained? Place the assumption of power being unavailable for > 4 hours as a bullet in the stem. NEW 412612007 Agreed to let it be a SRO question Will work on distractors C and D. C complete still working on D Continue to work on 5110/2007 SAT 5/30/2007
1.

2.

3. Psychometric Flaws

4. Job Content Flaws

5. Other

6.

7.
Q# LOK LOD (F/H) (1-5) Stem Cues T/F Credo Partial Job-Minutia
1 8ack-Q=
SRO U/E/S Explanation Focus Dis!. Link unit ward KIA Only s 61 H 2 X X X U 056G2.4.6 Question appears to match KIA. It is not 81 SRO only knowledge. Distractors C and D are not credible. With the statement ESF equipment responds as designed means that everything that was supposed to start and run did start and is running. So how can this be considered to be a loss of all AC. With CST at 14 feet, can the plant cooldown lAW EOP 1.3. There is a 29 hours soak in EOP-1.3, can this be maintained? Place the assumption of power being unavailable for> 4 hours as a bullet in the stem. NEW 4/26/2007 Agreed to let it be a SRO question Will work on distractors C and D. C complete still working on D Continue to work on 5/10/2007 SAT 5/30/2007
2.
3. Psychometric Flaws

4. Job Content Flaws

5. Other 6.
7. Q# LOK LOD
(F/H) (1-5) Stem Cues T/F Cred. Partial Job-Minutia
1 Back-Q SRO U/E/S Explanation Focus Dist.
Link unit ward K/A Only 5 7/ H 2 X U OO1AA2.05 Question Kind of matches K/A. This is 82 not SRO knowledge. This is RO Knowledge, typically this is IOA of a uncontrolled rod withdrawal and appears to be one in AOP-403.3. PT-447 decreasing indicates a First stage pressure transmitter failure (although it is going the wrong way for the above indications) I believe that this is an attempt to make distrators C and D credible. C and D are not credible with two actions in the distractor when the stem asks for the next (one) action. NEW 4126/2007 Continue to work on 511012007 Select new K/A. Look at B and D negative delta I Okay SAT 5I3012007 8/ H 2 X U EO7EA2.2 Question appears to match K/A. 83 Distractor A and C are not credible. Distractor D is much to wordy, why would some one not choose this answer it is so broad that it cant be wrong. Distractor C is not credible, you never have to transition to a yellow path. What does it mean to address a procedure? Not in OAP-1 03.4 provided. Question is also on another exam. And is listed as new on this test? NEW 412612007 S Reworked SAT 5/10/2007
1.

2.

3. Psychometric Flaws

4. Job Content Flaws

5. Other

6.

7.
Q# LOK LaD (F/H) (1-5) Stem Cues T/F Credo Partial Job-Minutia
1 Back-Q=
SRO utE/S Explanation Focus Dist. Link unit ward KIA Only s 7/ H 2 X U 001AA2.05 Question Kind of matches KIA. This is 82 not SRO knowledge. This is RO Knowledge, typically this is lOA of a uncontrolled rod withdrawal and appears to be one in AOP-403.3. PT -447 decreasing indicates a First stage pressure transmitter failure (although it is going the wrong way for the above indications) I believe that this is an attempt to make distrators C and D credible. C and D are not credible with two actions in the distractor when the stem asks for the next (one) action. NEW 4/26/2007 Continue to work on 5/10/2007 Select new KIA. Look at Band 0 negative delta I Okay SAT 5/30/2007 8/ H 2 X U E07EA2.2 Question appears to match KIA. 83 Distractor A and C are not credible. Distractor D is much to wordy, why would some one not choose this answer it is so broad that it can't be wrong. Distractor C is not credible, you never have to transition to a yellow path. What does it mean to address a procedure? Not in OAP-103.4 provided. Question is also on another exam. And is listed as new on this test? NEW 4/26/2007 S Reworked SAT 5/10/2007
2.
3. Psychometric Flaws

4. Job Content Flaws

5. Other 6.
7. Q# LOK LOD
(F/H) (1-5) Stem Cues T/F Cred. Partial Job-Minutia
1 Back-Q SRO U/E/S Explanation Focus Dist.
Link unit ward K/A Only 5 9/ H 1 X U E08G2.2.22 Question appears to match K/A. Does 84 not appear to be SRO only knowledge. TS limit on pressure, may be exceeded, which limit? The only TS limit that applies with these conditions is 2735 psig. There are limits in the CSFs but these on not TS limits. What actions does EOP-16.0 have to limit pressure that other procedures dont. These distractors are not credible. No discriminating value. NEW 412612007 Rewrite question using figure in EOP-16.0 Continue to work on 5I10I2007 Table to work on later 5I30I2007 Marked out numbers on curve. Reference allowed. 6I7I2007 10/ H 2 X U E15G2.1.14 Question kind of matches K/A. How 85 much RB spray flow will be established if all ESF equipment operated as designed? If it is greater than 2500 gpm, then raise the RB pressure to 12.5 psig and stable. The question asks for three items and only four choices are available. Insufficient counterbalance as in each case, the procedure, whether incorrect or correct, is paired with its associated strategy. The applicant need only know the procedure or the strategy, not both. If the strategy, including notification is not necessary knowledge, then the question does not meet the K/A. BANK 4I26I2007 Changed question SAT 5I10/2007
1.

2.

3. Psychometric Flaws

4. Job Content Flaws

5. Other

6.

7.
Q# LOK LOD (F/H) (1-5) Stem Cues T/F Credo Partial Job-Minutia
1 8ack-Q=
SRO U/E/S Explanation Focus Dist. Link unit ward KIA Only s 9/ H 1 X U E08G2.2.22 Question appears to match KIA. Does 84 not appear to be SRO only knowledge. TS limit on pressure, may be exceeded, which limit? The only TS limit that applies with these conditions is 2735 psig. There are limits in the CSFs but these on not TS limits. What actions does EOP-16.0 have to limit pressure that other procedures don't. These distractors are not credible. No discriminating value. NEW 4/26/2007 Rewrite question using figure in EOP-16.0 Continue to work on 5/10/2007 Table to work on later 5/30/2007 Marked out numbers on curve. Reference allowed. 6/712007 10/ H 2 X U E15G2.1.14 Question kind of matches KIA. How 85 much RB spray flow will be established if all ESF equipment operated as designed? If it is greater than 2500 gpm, then raise the RB pressure to 12.5 psig and stable. The question asks for three items and only four choices are available. Insufficient counterbalance as in each case, the procedure, whether incorrect or correct, is paired with it's associated strategy. The applicant need only know the procedure or the strategy, not both. If the strategy, including notification is not necessary knowledge, then the question does not meet the KIA. BANK 4/26/2007 Changed question SAT 5/10/2007
1. 2.
3. Psychometric Flaws

4. Job Content Flaws

5. Other 6.
7. Q# LOK LOD
(F/H) (1-5) Stem Cues T/F Cred. Partial Job-Minutia
1 Back-Q SRO U/E/S Explanation Focus Dist.
Link unit ward K/A Only 5 11/ H 1 X U 004A2.15 Question appears to match the K/A. Not 86 SRO only the action on the correct answer is an immediate operator action from AOP4O1.6 this is RO knowledge. Not very discriminating. Also each action contained in a distractor is unique, this would allow the applicant to pick the correct answer based on the action that needed to be performed and not know the procedure. BANK 412612007 Look at adding a T/S call with this. Continue to work on 5I1 012007 Worked on distractors with T/S slant continue to work. Reworked. SAT 5I30I2007 12/ H 2 X U 010A2.02 Question appears to match the K/A. 87 Distractors A and B are not credible. AOP-401.5 has no actions that deal with a stuck open spray valve. So why would anyone choose them? NEW 4I2612007 Rewrote Question Check on final exam 5118/2007 13/ H 1 U 022G2.4.30 Question appears to match K/A. This is 88 a direct look up with the reference. Suggest using 1 hour, 4 hour, 8 hour, and 24 hour reporting times and not using the reference. This has a LOD of 1 with the reference, and the applicant not having to make a TS call. NEW 4I26/2007 Leave as is no reference SAT 5/10I2007
1.

2.

3. Psychometric Flaws

4. Job Content Flaws

5. Other

6.

7.
Q# LOK LOD (F/H) (1-5) Stem Cues T/F Credo Partial Job-Minutia
1 Back-Q=
SRO utE/S Explanation Focus Dis!. Link unit ward KIA Only s 111 H 1 X U 004A2.15 Question appears to match the KIA. Not 86 SRO only the action on the correct answer is an immediate operator action from AOP401.6 this is RO knowledge. Not very discriminating. Also each action contained in a distractor is unique, this would allow the applicant to pick the correct answer based on the action that needed to be performed and not know the procedure. BANK 4/26/2007 Look at adding a TIS call with this. Continue to work on 5/10/2007 Worked on distractors with TIS slant continue to work. Reworked. SAT 5/30/2007 121 H 2 X U 010A2.02 Question appears to match the KIA. 87 Distractors A and B are not credible. AOP-401.5 has no actions that deal with a stuck open spray valve. So why would anyone choose them? NEW 4/26/2007 Rewrote Question Check on final exam 5/18/2007 131 H 1 U 022G2.4.30 Question appears to match KIA. This is 88 a direct look up with the reference. Suggest using 1 hour, 4 hour, 8 hour, and 24 hour reporting times and not using the reference. This has a LOD of 1 with the reference, and the applicant not having to make a TS call. NEW 4/26/2007 Leave as is no reference SAT 5/10/2007
2.
3. Psychometric Flaws

4. Job Content Flaws

5. Other 6.
7. Q# LOK LOD
(F/H) (1-5) Stem Cues T/F Cred. Partial Job-Minutia
1 Back-Q SRO U/E/S Explanation Focus Dist.
Link unit ward K/A Only S 14/ H 1 X X X U 013A2.05 Does not appear to match the K/A. What 89 part of the ESFAS failed to work. It does not appear that the plant entered a condition that caNed for an ESF actuation signal, unless you are saying that the load shed is an ESFAS. I dont see this in the supporting information that you have given. The Question can also be answered using systems knowledge, with out DC power there is no way to open the breakers from the MCB (may not have indication either) without tripping power breakers would remain shut. Therefore B is the only answer that is correct, and I have not even mentioned a TS time. BANK 412612007 Changed question removed one of the items that we were asking for. SAT 511012007 15/ H 1 X X U 076G2.4.6 Question kind of matches K/A. The K/A 90 asks for EOP actions, but with some systems this leaves very limited options, so AOP actions are allowed. This question goes all the way down to the SOP level. If C SW pump does not have auto start capabilities then distractor A is not credible. Distractor B states to trip all RCPs, This is not credible without tripping the reactor first, so B is not credible. Not discriminating as written. BANK 412612007 Continue to work on 511 0I2007 Auto start feature.
1.

2.

3. Psychometric Flaws

4. Job Content Flaws

5. Other

6.

7.
Q# LOK LOD (F/H) (1-5) Stem Cues T/F Credo Partial Job-Minutia
1 Back-Q=
SRO U/E/S Explanation Focus Dist. Link unit ward KIA Only s 14/ H 1 X X X U 013A2.05 Does not appear to match the KIA. What 89 part of the ESFAS failed to work. It does not appear that the plant entered a condition that called for an ESF actuation signal, unless you are saying that the load shed is an ESFAS. I don't see this in the supporting information that you have given. The Question can also be answered using systems knowledge, with out DC power there is no way to open the breakers from the MCB (may not have indication either) without tripping power breakers would remain shut. Therefore B is the only answer that is correct, and I have not even mentioned a TS time. BANK 4/26/2007 Changed question removed one of the items that we were asking for. SAT 5/10/2007 15/ H 1 X X U 076G2.4.6 Question kind of matches KIA. The KIA 90 asks for EOP actions, but with some systems this leaves very limited options, so AOP actions are allowed. This question goes all the way down to the SOP level. If C SW pump does not have auto start capabilities then distractor A is not credible. Distractor B states to trip all RCPs, This is not credible without tripping the reactor first, so B is not credible. Not discriminating as written. BANK 4/26/2007 Continue to work on 5/10/2007 Auto start feature.
1. 2.
3. Psychometric Flaws

4. Job Content Flaws

5. Other 6.
7. Q# LOK LOD
i
(F/H) (1-5) Stem Cues T/F Cred. PartiaI Job-Minutia
1 Back-Q=
SRO U/E/S Explanation Focus Dist. Link unit ward K/A Only S 16/ H 2 X X U 001G2.1.23 Question kind of matches K/A. 91 Distractor A does not make sense, the distractor states only the AOP applies, and then gives TS actions. Distractor C is also correct, while the TS does apply, these actions of AOP-403.5 would bring the rod back withing TS, and operation could continue. This could be argued as correct. With all the information in D the applicant would probably pick it. Should not have distractors that state IF. NEW 412612007 Work on question with a T/S slant. SAT 513012007 17/ F 2 X X E 029G2.1.32 Question appears to match K/A. Stem is 92 difficult to understand. Try: Unit Shutdown Equipment Hatch open Which One (1) of the following describes the proper alignment for RB purge fans and the radiation monitor requirements lAW SOP 114? If core alts were in progress then 2 supply and 2 exhaust fans would be running this should be a distractor. NEW 412612007 Check on final exam 5I18I2007 SAT 5I30I2007 18/ H 2 X S 086A2.03 Question appears to match K/A. Not 93 much discriminatory value. NEW 4126l2007
1.

2.

3. Psychometric Flaws

4. Job Content Flaws

5. Other

6.

7.
Q# LOK LOD (F/H) (1-5) Stem Cues T/F Credo Partial Job-Minutia
1 8ack-Q=
SRO U/E/S Explanation Focus Dis!. Link unit ward KIA Only s 16/ H 2 X X U 001 G2.1.23 Question kind of matches KIA. 91 Distractor A does not make sense, the distractor states only the AOP applies, and then gives TS actions. Distractor C is also correct, while the TS does apply, these actions of AOP-403.5 would bring the rod back withing TS, and operation could continue. This could be argued as correct. With all the information in D the applicant would probably pick it. Should not have distractors that state IF. NEW 4/26/2007 Work on question with a TIS slant. SAT 5/30/2007 171 F 2 X X E 029G2.1.32 Question appears to match KIA. Stem is 92 difficult to understand. Try: Unit Shutdown Equipment Hatch open Which One (1) of the following describes the proper alignment for RB purge fans and the radiation monitor requirements lAW SOP 114? If core alts were in progress then 2 supply and 2 exhaust fans would be running this should be a distractor. NEW 4/26/2007 Check on final exam 5/18/2007 SAT 5/30/2007 181 H 2 X S 086A2.03 Question appears to match KIA. Not 93 much discriminatory value. NEW 4/26/2007
1. 2.
3. Psychometric Flaws

4. Job Content Flaws

5. Other 6.
7. Q# LOK LCD
(F/H) (1-5) Stem Cues T/F Cred. Partial Job-Minutia
1 Back-Q SRO UIEIS Explanation Focus Dist.
Link unit ward K/A Only S 19/ H I U G2. 1.11 Question appears to match K/A. This topic 94 was used on the last Summer Retake Exam. There are many 1 hour TIS to choose from. How did this question get randomly selected? I know that it somewhat modified but with it being on the last exam I dont think that is has any discriminatory value. Modified 4126/2007 2006 Retake Rewrote Question SAT Changed distractors B and D to make more wrong. 6/7/2007. 20/ F I X U G2.1.6 Question appears to match K/A. The only 95 distractor that allows immediate action to be taken is the A, the correct answer. All others require either notification or concurrence. This makes all other distractor non-plausible. With no credible distractors this question has no discriminatory value. BANK 4/26/2007 Rewrote Question SAT 5I14I2007. 21/ H 2 X U G2.2.21 Question appears to match K/A. Distractors 96 B and D do not appear to be credible. BANK 4I26I2007 Still Needs Work. 511 412007.Changed distractors SAT 5I30I2007
1.

2.

3. Psychometric Flaws

4. Job Content Flaws

5. Other

6.

7.
Q# LOK LOD (FtH) (1-5) Stem Cues TtF Credo Partial Job-Minutia #t 8ack-Q= SRO utEtS Explanation Focus Dist. Link unit ward KIA Only s 191 H 1 U G2.1.11 Question appears to match KIA. This topic 94 was used on the last Summer Retake Exam. There are many 1 hour TIS to choose from. How did this question get randomly selected? I know that it somewhat modified but with it being on the last exam I don't think that is has any discriminatory value. Modified 4/26/2007 2006 Retake Rewrote Question SAT Changed distractors Band 0 to make more wrong. 6/7/2007. 201 F 1 X U G2.1.6 Question appears to match KIA. The only 95 distractor that allows immediate action to be taken is the A, the correct answer. All others require either notification or concurrence. This makes all other distractor non-plausible. With no credible distractors this question has no discriminatory value. BANK 4/26/2007 Rewrote Question SAT 5/14/2007. 211 H 2 X U G2.2.21 Question appears to match KIA. Distractors 96 Band 0 do not appear to be credible. BANK 4/26/2007 Still Needs Work. 5/14/2007.Changed distractors SAT 5/30/2007
1. 2.
3. Psychometric Flaws

4. Job Content Flaws

5. Other 6.
7. Q# LOK LCD (F/H) (1-5) Stem Cues T/F Cred. Partial Job-Minutia
1 Back-Q SRO U/E/S Explanation Focus Dist.
Link unit ward K/A Only 5 22/ F 1 X U G2.2.25 Question appears to match K/A. Not SRO 97 only, this is RO knowledge. BANK 412612007 Not SRO only quesUon Rewrite Question. New Guidance.5I1 4I2007. Talk to boss 5I18I2007 RO Knowledge. Replace. SAT 513012007 Changed C and D to 60 minutes. SAT 6I7I07 23/ F 1 X U G2.3.2 Question appears to match K/A. Not SRO 98 only, this is Radiation worker knowledge. All workers are taught what requires a PJB, Alara Review and RWP/SWP review prior to entering the rad side. NEW 4I26I2007 Made changes as required still look at B distractor otherwise SAT 5I14I2007. 24/ H I U G2.4.22 Question appears to match K/A. This 99 question was used on the last Summer NRC exam and will have little discriminatory value. There are many other bank questions that would apply to this K/A. BANK 412612007 Talk to boss, let him decide the fate of the question.5I1 4I2007. Boss decided for question to remain on test. SAT 5I30I2007
1.

2.

3. Psychometric Flaws

4. Job Content Flaws

5. Other

6.

7.
Q# LOK LOD (F/H) (1-5) Stem Cues T/F Credo Partial Job-Minutia
1 8ack-Q=
SRO U/E/S Explanation Focus Dist. Link unit ward KIA Only s 22/ F 1 X U G2.2.25 Question appears to match KIA. Not SRO 97 only, this is RO knowledge. BANK 4/26/2007 Not SRO only question Rewrite Question. New Guidance.5/14/2007. Talk to boss 5/18/2007 RO Knowledge. Replace. SAT 5/30/2007 Changed C and 0 to 60 minutes. SAT 6/7107 23/ F 1 X U G2.3.2 Question appears to match KIA. Not SRO 98 only, this is Radiation worker knowledge. All workers are taught what requires a PJB, Alara Review and RWP/SWP review prior to entering the rad side. NEW 4/26/2007 Made changes as required still look at B distractor otherwise SAT 5/14/2007. 24/ H 1 U G2.4.22 Question appears to match KIA. This 99 question was used on the last Summer NRC exam and will have little discriminatory value. There are many other bank questions that would apply to this KIA. BANK 4/26/2007 Talk to boss, let him decide the fate of the question.5/14/2007. Boss decided for question to remain on test. SAT 5/30/2007
1. 2.
3. Psychometric Flaws

4. Job Content Flaws

5. Other 6.
7. Q# LOK LOD i
V (F/H) (1-5) Stem Cues T/F Cred. Partial Job-Minutia
1 Back-Q SRO U/E/S Explanation Focus Dist.
Link unit ward K/A Only S 25/ H 1 X U 2.4.11 Question appears to match KJA. It is not SRO 100 only, Reactor Operators are required to know the symptoms and entry conditions for procedures. BANK 412012007 Ask the boss and HQ. 5I14I2007. RO knowledge. Replace with mitigating strategies. 513012007
1.

2.

3. Psychometric Flaws

4. Job Content Flaws

5. Other

6.

7.
Q# LOK LOD (F/H) (1-5) Stem Cues T/F Credo Partial Job-Minutia
1 8ack-Q= SRO U/E/S Explanation Focus Dist.
Link unit ward KIA Only s 25/ H 1 X U 2.4.11 Question appears to match KIA. It is not SRO 100 only, Reactor Operators are required to know the symptoms and entry conditions for procedures. BANK 4/20/2007 Ask the boss and HQ. 5/14/2007. RO knowledge. Replace with mitigating strategies. 5/30/2007
ES-403 Written Examination Grading Form ES-403-1 Quality Checklist Facility: r Date of Exam: ø (3 2-007 Exam Level: ROE2SROL Initials Item Description a b 1. Clean answer sheets copied before grading 2. Answer key changes and question deletions justified and_documented 3. Applicants scores checked for addition errors
(reviewers spot check> 25% of examinations) )tf 4. Grading for all borderline cases (80 +/-2% overall and 70 or 80, as applicable, +/-4% on the SRO-only) reviewed in detail LP 9 tjtA 5. All other failing examinations checked to ensure that grades 1 L are_justified 6. Performance on missed questions checked for training jj deficiencies and wording problems; evaluate validity of questions_missed_by_half_or_more_of the_applicants Printed Name/Signature Date
a. Grader I3o

b. Facility Reviewer(*)
I r7
c. NRC Chief Examiner(*)
J
d. NRC Supervisor (*)
j-/fl -7 7Ja fr? (*) The facility reviewers signature is not applicable for examinations graded by the NRC; two independent NRC reviews are required. ES-403, Page 5 of 5 ES-403 Written Examination Grading Quality Checklist Form ES-403-1 Date of Exam: £0 '2..-007 Exam Level: RO[J6-sRO Item Descri tion
1.

2.
Answer key changes and question deletions justified and documented
3.
Applicants' scores checked for addition errors (reviewers s ot check> 25% of examinations)
4.
Grading for all borderline cases (80 +/-2% overall and 70 or 80, as a plicable, +/-4% on the SRO-onl reviewed in detail
5.

6.
All other failing examinations checked to ensure that grades are 'ustified Performance on missed questions checked for training deficiencies and wording problems; evaluate validity of uestions missed b half or more of the a licants Printed Name/Signature
a. Grader

b. Facility Reviewer(*)

c. NRC Chief Examiner(*)

d. NRC Supervisor (*)
a
VIA I
Initials Date b '-13~07 0-1,(-0'7 "7/16/ 6 7 7(2.'"\\ J:Of I (*) The facility reviewer's signature is not applicable for examinations graded by the NRC; two inde endent NRC reviews are re uired. ES-403, Page 5 of 5
SEATING CHART FOR VCSNS 2007 NRC EXAM (06/13/07) BACK OF ROOM Duhaime L Bruner Ervin Mathias Crawford Steed Todd PROCTOR PROCTOR FRONT OF ROOM I Duhaime [- I Bruner SEATING CHART FOR VCSNS 2007 NRC EXAM (06/13/07) BACK OF ROOM I Ervin I Crawford I Mathias II PROCTOR IIII PROCTOR II FRONT OF ROOM I Steed I Todd
Student Questions and Answers Question # Candidate Question
Response
Initials O4 5 4 c ,io 5 h ( rct cL I I A. f-e_ gr-6 rtd och
4 2i 7 61\\ / 1E L (/]L. (oLc
1q / co. (Q3 /iJ AV& 5 L 3 - 2 Z ej // C1( S V (- -e (i A v Oy 4 -( l feS 1 c& L f t 4 2d V G j4 / 64c4 $p &2k). I 4 (tAtk 1 6%A. 5 i h Student Questions and Answers Question # Candidate Question
Response
Initials t=)rO/f'l 5 h-r--W S'! et0J~ - ~ bb ~v..r-<J t>U6~f-VOL( Aowe el\\'OCl.~ it. I tI'.J-v ~O (NCUcLe. 'I /lA, ~S'~ ___ ~q "7-- 4\\ 3( G\\ N?"'\\- (om.r Ci.!:.> 0'\\.C. oJ!! \\/£.5 Ii-4"f fc.r-v f {' lc.f~ dC17~-J, f q/~ ~,0- 6<-(.((vt-
'1-
~h/;tJ V4.lv.e +/-:l-i~ ~ A 'fiJi) ?53)1-L~vv-J XJ bi33 (-(5 (pOS¥J:A L ]~;:?~ ~ () r;~J") ~ t'S.f'(j'¥.3~ (O/L0......" P ({. *r (.3,.vr Q? ",;::'.z;>.) (:I..-,'c-D.... c.~?.-cct l\\&\\.cI\\ 1 S /LI c_ Ik- ~-"I..~<:-\\.~ J"/\\=O, f).rt...o-" '"", <- rA'I f"/4!.. :?s
-~
L0:5 6a.(j-e-r-(At\\ CLOy -I.e/!.I1\\.L ~ br- \\/ 0 vL k tl v.. &-"Vl~ C, k \\ til..{-vI'.v(c", +z J~ *-v I '32 r-. I I'e f/!-/ ./ '\\ I I ::yrl-iN eo(2-Z. 2 +0 C!.>>lJ v.J V' -tlA. l chJ f Jh dVl. f-- U .(~ -r !.f£d i)y. '+ vve... ~I.c-~ CL iJI+-~J~ Q aff-vr-I-e..c"" /, f'/c, Sy:;? I Vc (--e.. m 'si/Ny IN '15 I I ---J )'0 D6-e-.S. A I\\. W £\\1' ~ I\\AQ..~ ~ I, 1 ~. I zp t:;-(JVJ ND +- V a(.d Y'Y',AI'd-,.,.J IS.. t ~ D N 01-uV5\\I-eJ I (r,,<,+~l (t'sfiMJe C'\\A lou tf...ri) l v?
xl C;-/?'d
'h)~. ~
frl~Z(/lr'
~ fJ t-\\. kau ~ ~ OJt1\\;t I vt/wlv'l.fi..hJItt ,-1 4 ~ N1:l/ J ,~ (VIA~I.Pe.r.~ q.vJ?Jhd"V' U CfJ\\J
11\\~ f-z'J,u/s(i-tl-k
~"r y () I.A ka 1/-<- ~lh!<:.lA I IAtw i<A ().A/~ J ~(p 3(p (1-(2.(-"->-. 1M.! I V ~ ({~ rP 4Y 1-0 ~~\\Af4 --f1..u. C1V e Al ~ ~i2XJ cJ;J
Jv-hS,"r) t..t (!Jt,
'Yd l lEi titl lit {/thct.~,\\ j ifi ft'1',1rta{lhl
0 02
,::..*rJ A.;J,.... <.. ~1>Tt.:v-(.J .6;['0 /il~ Co.,-.c. 6a,j:. ) I 'h ~ til !) Vtl' t vi 'It\\.L t'rl/ e ( II u j,) I I I !}
Student Questions and Answers Question # Candidate Question
Response
Initials Lv Student Questions and Answers Question # Candidate Question
Response
Initials &~ I-JLj S5 ,V\\e~'" />1 ~ <t ~( ll.a v/;~" t/,lJ;,.;,j l II,dtJi~4\\/~~t;"\\A UV':Z,J
rtvrOI~""-f>-;7-if'"".,,;J (),V Lv "
I
/
I J" tu.*U:: k~r ",,,l "'t'l\\.c,<l'\\) <:,) 1111,vl.. 7J I I I i i -J I I l I I
FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY ESCE&6 A SCANA COMPANY Mr. Robert C. Haag, Chief Operator Licensing Branch Division of Reactor Safety U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Region II Sam Nunn Atlanta Federal Center 61 Forsyth Street, SW, Suite 23T85 Atlanta, GA 30303-893 1 Dear Mr. Haag Gary D. Moffatt Manager, Nuclear Training 803.345.4031 April 14, 2007
Subject:
Reference VIRGIL C. SUMMER NUCLEAR STATION DOCKET NO. 50-395 OPERATING LICENSE NO. NPF-12 REACTOR AND SENIOR REACTOR OPERATOR INITIAL EXAMINATIONS Robert C. Haag, NRC, letter to Jeffery B. Archie, February 14, 2007 Reactor and Senior Reactor Operator Initial Examinations Virgil C. Summer Nuclear Station Pursuant to your letter to Mr. Jeffery B. Archie dated February 14, 2007, and the guidelines of NUREG-1 021, SCE&G hereby submits the reactor operator and senior operator operational and written examinations which are scheduled to begin on June 4, 2007. In addition to the exams, please find enclosed completed Forms ES-201-2, ES-201-3, ES-301-1, ES-301-2, ES-301-3, ES-301-4, ES-301-5, ES-301-6, ES-401-2, ES4O1-3, ES-401-4, and ES-401-6, ES-D-1, ES-D-2; as well as supporting reference materials for the exams. In accordance with NUREG-1 021, this material must be withheld from public disclosure until after the examinations are complete. Should you have any questions, please call Mr. William R. Quick at (803) 931-5091. We are available at your convenience to discuss questions and/or comments that you may have on this submittal. ARK/GDM/dr Enclosures Very Truly yours, c: (Without Enclosures) Mr. K. B. Marsh Mr. S. A. Byrne Mr. J. B. Archie Mr. N. S. Carnes Mr. J. H. Hamilton Mr. R. J. White Dr. W. D. Travers FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY Mr. R. E. Martin Mr. G. D. Moffatt Document Control Clerk NRC Resident Inspector NRSC RTS (CR-07-00700) File (815.01) DMS (RC-07-0058) Gary D SCE&G I Virgil C. Summer Nuclear Station
R 0. Box 88. ienkinsville, South Carolina 29065 e T (803) 345.5209 e www.scana.com FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY A SCANA COMPANY Mr. Robert C. Haag, Chief Operator Licensing Branch Division of Reactor Safety U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Region II Sam Nunn Atlanta Federal Center 61 Forsyth Street, SW, Suite 23T85 Atlanta, GA 30303-8931 Dear Mr. Haag
Subject:
VIRGIL C. SUMMER NUCLEAR STATION DOCKET NO. 50-395 OPERATING LICENSE NO. NPF-12 Gary D. Moffatt Manager, Nuclear Training 803.345.4031 April 14,2007 REACTOR AND SENIOR REACTOR OPERATOR INITIAL EXAMINATIONS Reference Robert C. Haag, NRC, letter to Jeffery B. Archie, February 14, 2007 "Reactor and Senior Reactor Operator Initial Examinations - Virgil C. Summer Nuclear Station" Pursuant to your letter to Mr. Jeffery B. Archie dated February 14, 2007, and the guidelines of NUREG-1 021, SCE&G hereby submits the reactor operator and senior operator operational and written examinations which are scheduled to begin on June 4, 2007. In addition to the exams, please find enclosed completed Forms ES-201-2, ES-201-3, ES-301-1, ES-301-2, ES-301-3, ES-301-4, ES-301-5, ES-301-6, ES-401-2, ES401-3, ES-401-4, and ES-401-6, ES-D-1, ES-D-2; as well as supporting reference materials for the exams. In accordance with NUREG-1 021, this material must be withheld from public disclosure until after the examinations are complete. Should you have any questions, please call Mr. William R. Quick at (803) 931-5091. We are available at your convenience to discuss questions and/or comments that you may have on this submittal. ARK/GDM/dr Enclosures c: (Without Enclosures) Mr. K. B. Marsh Mr. S. A. Byrne Mr. J. B. Archie Mr. N. S. Carnes Mr. J. H. Hamilton Mr. R. J. White Dr. W. D. Travers Very Truly yours, G~at~ Mr. R. E. Martin Mr. G. D. Moffatt Document Control Clerk NRC Resident Inspector NRSC RTS (CR-07-00700) File (815.01) DMS (RC-07-0058) FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY S(E&G I Virgil C. Summer Nuclear Station
P. O. Box 88

Jenkinsville, South Carolina 29065. T (803) 345.5209

www.scona.(om
FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY ary o a epjItI Manager, Nuclear Training L 803.345.4031 A SCANA COMPANY March 23, 2007 Mr. Robert C. Haag, Chief Operations Branch, Division of Reactor Safety U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Sam Nunn Atlanta Federal Center 61 Forsyth Street, SW, Suite 23T85 Atlanta, GA 30303-8931
Dear Mr. Haag:
Subject:
VIRGIL C. SUMMER NUCLEAR STATION DOCKET NO. 50/395 OPERATING LICENSE NO. NPF-12 REACTOR AND SENIOR REACTOR OPERATOR INITIAL EXAMINATION OUTLINES
Reference:
Mr. Robert C. Haag, NRC, Letter to Mr. Jeffrey B. Archie, SCE&G, dated February 14, 2007, Reactor and Senior Reactor Operator Initial Examinations Based on the guidelines in NUREG-1 021, Operator Licensing Examination Standards for Power Reactors, Revision 9, in particular ES-201, Initial Operator Licensing Examination Process, South Carolina Electric & Gas Company (SCE&G) has enclosed the following information for your consideration. - examination outline for the written exam - examination outline for the operational exam - NRC Examination Schedule, ES-201-2, and Random Sampling Methodology The outlines have been independently reviewed by Mr. William R. Quick, Supervisor, Nuclear Training, and approved by me. In accordance with NUREG-1 021, this material must be withheld from public disclosure until after the examinations are complete. Should there be any questions, please contact Mr. Quick at (803) 931-5091. Very truly yours, Gary D. offatt DWR/GDM/dr Enclosures c: (Without Enclosure unless noted) G. W. Laska (NRC e-mail notification) CER (C-07-0700) A. R. Koon (w/Enclosures) File (814.04) NRC Resident Inspector PRS (RC-07-0044) FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY SCE&G I Virgil C. Summer Nuclear Station
R 0. Box 88. ienkinsville, South Carolina 29065

T (803) 345.5209

www.sceg.com MAR 272007 FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY Gary D. Moffatt Manager, Nuclear Training 803.345.4031 A SCANA COMPANY March 23, 2007 Mr. Robert C. Haag, Chief Operations Branch, Division of Reactor Safety U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Sam Nunn Atlanta Federal Center 61 Forsyth Street, SW, Suite 23T85 Atlanta, GA 30303-8931
Dear Mr. Haag:
Subject:
VIRGIL C. SUMMER NUCLEAR STATION DOCKET NO. 50/395 OPERATING LICENSE NO. NPF-12 REACTOR AND SENIOR REACTOR OPERATOR INITIAL EXAMINATION OUTLINES
Reference:
Mr. Robert C. Haag, NRC, Letter to Mr. Jeffrey B. Archie, SCE&G, dated February 14,2007, "Reactor and Senior Reactor Operator Initial Examinations" Based on the guidelines in NUREG-1 021, "Operator Licensing Examination Standards for Power Reactors", Revision 9, in particular ES-201, "Initial Operator Licensing Examination Process", South Carolina Electric & Gas Company (SCE&G) has enclosed the following information for your consideration.
- examination outline for the written exam

- examination outline for the operational exam

- NRC Examination Schedule, ES-201-2, and Random Sampling Methodology The outlines have been independently reviewed by Mr. William R. Quick, Supervisor, Nuclear Training, and approved by me.
In accordance with NUREG-1021, this material must be withheld from public disclosure until after the examinations are complete. Should there be any questions, please contact Mr. Quick at (803) 931-5091. Very truly yours, bffa~ DWR/GDM/dr Enclosures c: (Without Enclosure unless noted) G. W. Laska (NRC e-mail notification) A. R. Koon (w/Enciosures) NRC Resident Inspector CER (C-07-0700) File (814.04) PRS (RC-07 -0044) FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY SCE&G I Virgil C. Summer Nuclear Stafion
P. O. Box 88

Jenkinsville, South Carolina 29065. T (803) 345.5209

www.sceg.com MAR 27}}

ML101600050

Contents

Text

Response

Response

Response

Response

Subject:

Subject:

Dear Mr. Haag:

Subject:

Reference:

Dear Mr. Haag:

Subject:

Reference:

Navigation menu

ML101600050

Text

Response

Response

Response

Response

Subject:

Subject:

Dear Mr. Haag:

Subject:

Reference:

Dear Mr. Haag:

Subject:

Reference:

Navigation menu

Search