ML101320220

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Steam Generator Tube Inspection Report Review
ML101320220
Person / Time
Site: Point Beach NextEra Energy icon.png
Issue date: 05/18/2010
From: Justin Poole
Plant Licensing Branch III
To: Meyer L
Point Beach
Poole Justin/DORL/LPL3-1/ 301-415-2048
References
TAC ME1247
Download: ML101320220 (4)


Text

UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION WASHINGTON, D.C. 20555-0001 May 18, 2010 Mr. Larry Meyer Site Vice President NextEra Energy Point Beach, LLC 6610 Nuclear Road Two Rivers, WI 54241-9516 SUB~IECT:

POINT BEACH NUCLEAR PLANT, UNIT 1 - REVIEW OF THE 2008 STEAM GENERATOR TUBE INSERVICE INSPECTIONS PERFORMED DURING REFUELING OUTAGE 31 (U1R31) (TAC NO. ME1247)

Dear Mr. Meyer:

By letter dated May 7,2009, as supplemented by letter dated October 16, 2009 (Agencywide Documents Access and Management System (ADAMS) Accession Nos. ML091280187 and ML092890472), NextEra Energy Point Beach, LLC (the licensee), submitted information summarizing the results of the 2008 steam generator (SG) tube inspections performed at Point Beach Nuclear Plant, Unit 1, during the 31 5

\\ refueling outage. In addition, the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) staff summarized additional information concerning the 2008 SG tube inspections at Point Beach Nuclear Plant, Unit 1, in a letter dated November 20, 2008 (ADAMS Accession No. ML083230820).

The NRC staff has completed its review of these reports and concludes that the licensee provided the information required by Point Beach Nuclear Plant Unit 1 Technical Specifications and that no additional follow-up is required at this time. The NRC staff's review of this report is enclosed.

Sincerely, p~

Justin Poole, Project Manager Plant Licensing Branch 111-1 Division of Operating Reactor Licensing Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation Docket No. 50-266 cc: Distribution via Listserv

UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION WASHINGTON, D.C. 20555-0001 POINT BEACH NUCLEAR PLANT, UNIT 1 REVIEW OF 2008 STEAM GENERATOR TUBE INSPECTION REPORTS FOR THE FALL 2008 REFUELING OUTAGE DOCKET NUMBER 50-266 By letter dated May 7,2009, as supplemented by letter dated October 16, 2009 (Agencywide Documents Access Management System (ADAMS) Accession Nos. ML091280187 and ML092890472), NextEra Energy Point Beach, LLC (the licensee), submitted information summarizing the results of the 2008 steam generator (SG) tube inspections performed at Point Beach Nuclear Plant (PBNP), Unit 1, during the 31st refueling outage (U1R31). In addition, the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) staff summarized additional information concerning the 2008 SG tube inspections at PBNP, Unit 1, in a letter dated November 20,2008 (ADAMS Accession No. ML083230820).

PBNP Unit 1 has two Westinghouse 44F SGs each containing 3214 thermally-treated Alloy 600 tubes. These SGs were installed during refueling outage 11 in 1983. The tubes have an outside diameter of 0.875 inches, a wall thickness of 0.050 inches, and are supported by six stainless steel tube support plates and a baffle plate. The tube support plate holes are quatrefoil shaped. The U-bend region of the tubes in rows 1 through 8 was stress relieved after bending.

The licensee provided the scope, extent, methods, and results of their SG tube inspections in the documents referenced above. In addition, the licensee described corrective actions (i.e., tube plugging) taken in response to the inspection findings. The tubes in both SGs A and B were inspected this outage.

After review of the information provided by the licensee, the NRC staff has the following comments/observations:

  • The SGs have accumulated approximately 244.8 effective full power months (EFPM) of operation. At the time of the U1R31 outage, the SGs had operated approximately 23.3 EFPM in the 60-EFPM sequential period.
  • Chemical cleaning and sludge lancing were performed in both SGs. Approximately, 7700 pounds of material were removed as a result of these operations.
  • Secondary side inspections were performed in SGs A and B during the U1R31 outage.

The inspections in both SGs included the steam drum, feedring, J-nozzles, quatrefoil shaped holes in the top uppermost (sixth) tube support plate, and the flow distribution baffle. In addition, post-chemical cleaning and sludge lance cleanliness visual inspections and foreign object search and retrieval were performed.

- 2

  • Flow impingement patterns were observed on the feedwater ring, on the outside of primary moisture separator riser barrels as well as under and around several J-nozzles.

Possible wear marks were noted inside the feedwater ring near the tee at the bottom concaved portion of the distribution ring with no discernable pattern in SG B. The licensee stated that this will be monitored as part of the secondary side integrity program.

  • Thin wafers of rust colored debris were noted in-bundle of the primary separator riser barrels. This debris was reported as being most likely magnetite or scale pieces fallen from the riser tubes. The quatrefoil-shaped holes of the top support plate were determined to have zero percent blockage within the observed individual foils.

Additionally, the no-tube lane contained diminished remnants of sludge debris ranging from 0.25 to 0.50 inches high and confined to the center stay rod area. Furthermore, the licensee identified remnant skeletal bridging and collars within the previous sludge pile region limited to a few columns near the center.

Based on a review of the information provided, the NRC staff concludes that the licensee provided the information required by the technical specifications. In addition, the NRC staff concludes that there are no technical issues that warrant follow-up action at this time since the inspections appear to be consistent with the objective of detecting potential tube degradation and the inspection results appear to be consistent with industry operating experience at similarly designed and operated units.

Principal Contributor: A. Obodoako, NRR Date: May 18, 2010

ML083230820).

The NRC staff has completed its review of these reports and concludes that the licensee provided the information required by Point Beach Nuclear Plant Unit 1 Technical Specifications and that no additional follow-up is required at this time. The NRC staff's review of this report is enclosed.

Sincerely, IRAJ Justin Poole, Project Manager Plant Licensing Branch 111-1 Division of Operating Reactor Licensing Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation Docket No. 50-266 cc: Distribution via Listserv DISTRIBUTION:

PUBLIC RidsNrrLABTully Resource LPL3-1 rtf RidsNrrPMPointBeach Resource RidsNrrDorlLpl3-1 Resource RidsNrrDciCsgb Resource RidsRgn3MailCenter Resource RidsOgcRp Resource AObodoako, NRR RidsAcrsAcnw_MailCTR Resource RidsNrrDorlDpr Resource 101320 0

'per memo daet d F b 24 2010 ADAM S Accession Number: ML 22 e ruarv.

NRR/CSGB/BC OFFICE LPL3-1/PM LPL3-1/LA NAME

,IPoole BTuily DATE 05/17/10 05/14/10 LPL3-1/BC RTaylor*

RPascarelli 05/15/10