ML101270223

Comment (19) E-mail Regarding Diablo Canyon Lr Env. Scoping

ML101270223
Person / Time
Site:	Diablo Canyon
Issue date:	04/12/2010
From:	Public Commenter Public Commenter
To:	Division of License Renewal
NRC/NRR/DLR
References
75FR4427
Download: ML101270223 (2)

Text

DiabloCanyonCEm Resource From: Carl Dudley [cdudley@kcbx.net]

Sent: Monday, April 12, 2010 3:24 PM To: Stuyvenberg, Andrew

Subject:

DCPP Environmental Impact Follow Up Flag: Follow up Flag Status: Flagged Commissioner Stuyvenberg; My name is Carl Dudley, a 26 year resident of San Luis Obispo. Im writing this email in support of the relicensing of Diablo Canyon Nuclear Power Plant. I also want to apologize for taking your (and the other commissioners) time. However I didnt want you to think that the community as a whole is supportive of the half truths and accusations I assume youve received from the folks against the renewal.

I dont have a science background but do observe the movement of people. Many of the original employees at the plant are exercising their retirement, but have chosen to continue to live near the plant. You have your own inspectors that also live and play near the plant. More important, their families are being raised near the plant.

For these reasons I believe the plant continues to be safe and will for years to come. I do, however, expect the nuclear operating license to be revoked if at any time the operation of the plant is deemed inadequate.

There is much talk of the new earthquake fault near the plant. I dont believe this should have anything to do with the renewal process. As I see it if this fault is too big of a threat for the plant to withstand, then I hope the NRC will revoke the operating permit immediately not and waiting for the expiration of the current plant operating license.

The 1400 +/- employees that make up the DCPP workforce offer much to our Community. They buy our products, assist with community and school activities, and volunteer with our numerous (we have over 1100 -

but thats another story) non-profit organizations. PG&E has also been a big contributor of our tax base and donations to our Community.

I believe you should all do your job with an open mind. By doing so you will be able to offer the environmental reasons why PG&E, and DCPP in particular, have earned the right to continue the relicensing process with a successful conclusion in a timely manner.

Carl Dudley 1

Federal Register Notice: 75FR4427 Comment Number: 19 Mail Envelope Properties (000901cada75$b54ad6d0$1fe08470$)

Subject:

DCPP Environmental Impact Sent Date: 4/12/2010 3:24:01 PM Received Date: 4/12/2010 3:23:53 PM From: Carl Dudley Created By: cdudley@kcbx.net Recipients:

"Stuyvenberg, Andrew" <Andrew.Stuyvenberg@nrc.gov>

Tracking Status: None Post Office: net Files Size Date & Time MESSAGE 1993 4/12/2010 3:23:53 PM Options Priority: Standard Return Notification: No Reply Requested: No Sensitivity: Normal Expiration Date:

Recipients Received: Follow up