ML101270221

Comment (18) E-mail Regarding Diablo Canyon Lr Env. Scoping

ML101270221
Person / Time
Site:	Diablo Canyon
Issue date:	04/12/2010
From:	Public Commenter Public Commenter
To:	Division of License Renewal
NRC/NRR/DLR
References
75FR4427
Download: ML101270221 (4)

Text

DiabloCanyonCEm Resource From: Sandy Jack [sjack@charter.net]

Sent: Monday, April 12, 2010 7:10 PM To: Stuyvenberg, Andrew

Subject:

Comments Regarding NRC's PG&E San Luis Obispo Environmental Scoping Meeting Attachments: Blank Bkgrd.gif; NRC EIS Comments Follow Up Flag: Follow up Flag Status: Flagged Mr. Stuyvenberg:

Attached are a few of my comments relative to the EIS meeting held in San Luis Obispo, CA regarding PG&E's application for the Diablo Canyon license renewal.

William Jack 1

Federal Register Notice: 75FR4427 Comment Number: 18 Mail Envelope Properties (F0108ACAEB68490E85BA5EE2F280C49A)

Subject:

Comments Regarding NRC's PG&E San Luis Obispo Environmental Scoping Meeting Sent Date: 4/12/2010 7:09:39 PM Received Date: 4/12/2010 7:05:25 PM From: Sandy Jack Created By: sjack@charter.net Recipients:

"Stuyvenberg, Andrew" <Andrew.Stuyvenberg@nrc.gov>

Tracking Status: None Post Office: Sandy Files Size Date & Time MESSAGE 197 4/12/2010 7:05:25 PM Blank Bkgrd.gif 210 NRC EIS Comments 23104 Options Priority: Standard Return Notification: No Reply Requested: No Sensitivity: Normal Expiration Date:

Recipients Received: Follow up

Page 1 of 1 file://c:\EMailCapture\Diablo_Canyon_LR_Env_Comments\18\attch1.gif 5/7/2010

8250 San Diego Road Atascadero, CA 93422 April 12, 2010 Mr. Andrew Stuyvenberg, Project Manager U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Mail Stop: O-11F1 Washington, DC 20555-0001

Dear Mr. Stuyvenberg,

Normally Im a member of the silent majority when it comes to writing letters but I am so disillusioned with what has been happening in Washington lately that I was indeed impressed that you and your staff would take the time, and expense to journey to San Luis Obispo County to hold an Environmental Scoping Meeting that included someone like myself. Moreover, I was impressed that you seemed to actually listen to what I and others had to say so please accept my thanks for that opportunity.

Ive lived in California for 29 years and have some knowledge of Environmental Impact Reviews (EIR) and Im a firm believer that we should fairly consider all aspects of any project that is being proposed. It is so important that those making the final decision have all the facts and can consider the total impact on not only the environment but the people who will be impacted by the project.

This brings me to my request that you fully consider, during the EIR, the total cost to this community should PG&Es Diablo Canyon license extension not be granted. PG&E has, in my opinion, been a good neighbor and is constantly concerned about the safety of Diablo Canyon and the people in the surrounding communities. PG&Es earthquake experience is second to none and I believe they would make the tough decision if it ever became necessary. A loss of an employer and neighbor of this caliber would have a devastating impact on all of us that live and work in the area.

Please have all aspects of the review run concurrently and insist on a fair and balanced review of the relevant issues when conducting the environmental review.

Respectfully yours, William S. Jack