ML101110073

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
2009 Quad Cities Initial License Exam, Administrative Files
ML101110073
Person / Time
Site: Quad Cities  Constellation icon.png
Issue date: 11/30/2009
From: Walton R
NRC/RGN-III/DRS/OLB
To:
Exelon Generation Co
References
50-254/09-301, 50-265/09-301, ES-201, ES-201-1 50-254/09-301, 50-265/09-301
Download: ML101110073 (14)


Text

2009 QUAD CITIES NUCLEAR POWER STATION INITIAL EXAMINATION ADMINISTRATIVE FILES

ES-201 Examination Preparation Checklist Form ES-201-1 Facility: Q\JCL~ C,t\<z.? Date of Examination: tJO\l 30 I '2 OO~

Examinations Developed by: Facility / NRC (circle one)

Target Chief Date* Task Description (Reference) Examiner's Initials

-180 1. Examination administration date confirmed (C.1.a; C.2.a and b) ~\l. \J

-120 2. NRC examiners and facility contact assigned (C.1.d; C.2.e) Q¥W

-120 3. Facility contact briefed on security and other requirements (C.2.c) <<Uw

-120 4. Corporate notification letter sent (Co2.d) R\(W

[-9D) [5. Reference material due (C.1.e; C.3.c; Attachment 2)) ~

~U

-75 6. Integrated examination outline(s) due, including Forms ES-201-2, ES-201-3, ES-301-1, ES-301-2, ES-301-5, ES-D-1's, ES-401-1/2, ES-401-3, and ES-401-4, as applicable (C.1.e and f; C.3.d)

-70 7. Examination outline(s) reviewed by NRC and feedback provided to facility licensee (C.2.h; C.3.e)

<<:lLJ

-45 8. Proposed examinations (including written, walk-through JPMs, and scenarios, as applicable), supporting documentation (including Forms ES-301-3, ES-301-4, ES-301-5, ES-301-6, and ES-401-6), and reference Riv) materials due (C.1.e, f, g and h; C.3.d)

-30 9. Preliminary license applications (NRC Form 398'5) due (C.1.1; C.2.g; ES-202)

~v.~

-14 10. Final license applications due and Form ES-201-4 prepared (C.1.1; Co2.i; ES-202)

~v)

-14 11. Examination approved by NRC supervisor for facility licensee review (C.2.h; C.3.f) R~

-14 12. Examinations reviewed with facility licensee (C.1.j; C.2.f and h; C.3.g) ~\t\J

-7 13. Written examinations and operating tests approved by NRC supervisor (C.2.i; C.3.h) Cfiw

-7 14. Final applications reviewed; examination approval and waiver letters sent (C.2.i; Attachment 4; ES-204) ~V

-7 15. Proctoring/written exam administration guidelines reviewed with facility licensee (C.3.k)

~J;;

-7 16. Approved scenarios, job performance measures, and questions distributed to NRC examiners (C.3.i) R\f\V

. Target dates are keyed to the examination date identified in the corporate notification letter They are for planning purposes and may be adjusted on a case-by-case basis in coordination with the facility licensee.

[ ) Applies only to examinations prepared by the NRC.

ES-201, Page 24 of 27

/

ES-201 Examination Security Agreement Form ES-201-3

1. Pre-Examination i\/1V . i'l/1\\- :to cc.,

I acknowledge that I have acquired specialized knowledge about the NRC licensing examinations scheduled for the week(s) of as of the date of my signature. I agree that I will not knowingly divulge any information about these examinations to any persons who have not been authorized by the NRC chief examiner. I understand that I am not to instruct, evaluate, or provide performance feedback to those applicants scheduled to be administered these licensing examinations from this date until completion of examination administration, except as specifically noted below and authorized by the NRC (e.g., acting as a simulator booth operator or communicator is acceptable if the individual does not select the training content or provide direct or indirect feedback). Furthermore, I am aware of the physical security measures and requirements (as documented in the facility licensee's procedures) and understand that violation of the conditions of this agreement may result in cancellation of the examinations and/or an enforcement action against me or the facility licensee. I will immediately report to facility management or the NRC chief examiner any indications or suggestions that examination security may have been compromised.

2. Post-Examination To the best of my know dge, d' not divulge to any unauthorized persons any information concerning the NRC licensing examinations administered during the week(s) of I '3C fI i Pf,.' rom the date that I entered into this security agreement until the completion of examination administration, I did not instruct, evaluate, or provide performance feedback to those applicants who were administered these licensing examinations, except as specifically noted below and authorized by the NRC.

PRINTED NAME DATE DATE NOTE

,;jJ(/-)f

--LJ:...L~---=--:::--..l.LI........l..l....-- ----.J~~~at.5-l:.~ ~~~~~ _ _ ~~q~~~~~

~~~'-+'--'~~O-----?~~~~:c!:::.._----==i"{;f;?~~~o&2:J~::==:::::..-~~~:.........;.#~~~~~;.....L,:~C?f

~~"""""'r..fLL-'=':""---,-,....-----C.lft}.£.L.llif~.!..I.._--~U~~~tJa.:L;::2;j~:'--~~({:::7,~~'IJ..~~~..l.-_4," f!+/Jl.7---:J i'd': lItt.h~J

-=~=~-,-=~:L,--_.>t:::.....l......L.::J~_----,_-:--_ _ ...l..~~~~~:..JJ;L---~~U!:J_~~~l:4-~~'=- I Wlltell f/)f

_~~~~~~L- ("l.it~

=-~~73=-----I;/~'ol

-H-fl!U>...o.,.~,-:----~oIpi.,.,lo-l-:~_~~~~.l....:>..I.-'-- ----."..p..j..a.~~::s:;:~----t:..:!:~t.-~bAJ.~~~::::::....-- .'

- .I

---'~-'-=":::"-~-7-'-'-=-- ----:-:...::.---~~----- _-:=-3il'?~~~"""'-o__- - - .....U-~ **_~7"'ir---r"""""::9--d---.L- __

~==+==--I.."":'="'=:::'-- --"=---><c....:....:...:.=..=:..L....:. ---!.~~~~:.- ~:!.:....:L _~~:!::::::=- 1-3'-/1> _ _

'-. .. r-i~~:'" t.

ES-201, Page 27 of 28

ES-201 Examination Security Agreement Form ES-201-3

1. Pre-Examination I acknowledge that I have acquired specialized knowledge about the NRC licensing examinations scheduled for the week(s) of il/JtJ-11./;r/~ff6f the date of my signature. I agree that I will not knowingly divulge any information about these examinations to any persons who have not been authorized by the NRC chief examiner. I understand that I am not to instruct, evaluate, or provide performance feedback to those applicants scheduled to be administered these licensing examinations from this date until completion of examination administration, except as specifically noted below and authorized by the NRC (e.g. acting as a simulator booth operator or communicator is acceptable if the individual does not select the training content or provide direct or indirect feedback). Furthermore, I am aware of the physical security measures and requirements (as documented in the facility licensee's procedures) and understand that violation of the conditions of this agreement may result in cancellation of the examinations and/or an enforcement action against me or the facility licensee. I will immediately report to facility management or the NRC chief examiner any indications or suggestions that examination security may have been compromised.
2. Post-Examination To the best of my knowledge'J sljg. not divulge to any unauthorized persons any information concerning the NRC licensing examinations administered during the week(s) of lip' n J "lDFrom the date that I entered into this security agreement until the completion of examination administration, I did not Instruct, evaluate, or provide performance feedback to those applicants who were administered these licensing examinations, except as specifically noted below and authorized by the NRC.

JOB TITLE / RESPONSIBILITY

?/1£ i/Ai !.//l:m!

ES-201, Page 27 of 28

ES-201 Examination Security Agreement Form ES-201-3

1. Pre-Examination

'Y:!o -;Z/IJIL(/~

I acknowledge that I have acquired specialized knowledge about the NRC licensing examinations scheduled for the week(s) of as of the date of my signature. I agree that I will not knowingly divulge any information about these examinations to any persons who have not been authorized by the NRC chief examiner. I understand that I am not to instruct, evaluate, or provide performance feedback to those applicants scheduled to be administered these licensing examinations from this date until completion of examination administration, except as specifically noted below and authonzed by the NRC (e.g., acting as a simulator booth operator or communicator is acceptable if the individual does not select the training content or provide direct or indirect feedback). Furthermore, I am aware of the physical security measures and n~quirements (as documented in the facility licensee's procedures) and understand that violation of the conditions of this agreement may result in cancellation of the examinations and/or an enforcement action against me or the facility licensee. I will immediately report to facility management or the NHC chief examiner any indications or suggestions that examination security may have been compromised.

2. Post-Examination To the best of my know) dge, I di not divulge to any unauthorized persons any information concerning the NRC licensing examinations administered during the week(s) of /.3' h 1# .'~rom the date that I entered into this security agreement until the completion of examination administration, I did not instruct, evaluate, or provide performance feedback to those applicants who were administered these licensing examinations, except as specifically noted below and authorized by the NRC.

ES-201, Page 27 of 28

ES-201 Examination Security Agreement Form ES-201-3

1. Pre-Examination I acknowledge that I have acquired specialized knowledge about the NRC licensing examinations scheduled for the week(s) of  !~ - 1.( /l1k5 6f the date of my signature. I agree that I will not knowingly divulge any information about these examinations to any persons who have not been authorized by the NRC chief examiner. I understand that I am not to instruct, evaluate, or provide performance feedback to those applicants scheduled to be administered these licensing examinations from this date until completion of examination administration, except as specifically noted below and authorized by the NRC (e.g., acting as a simulator booth operator or communicator is acceptable if the individual does not select the training content or provide direct or indirect feedback). Furthermore, I am aware of the physical security measures and requirements (as documented in the facility licensee's procedures) and understand that violation of the conditions of this agreement may result in cancellation of the examinations and/or an enforcement action against me or the facility licensee. I will immediately report to facility management or the NRC chief examiner any indications or suggestions that examination security may have been compromised.
2. Post-Examination To the best of my knowledge, I ,Qif not divulge to any unauthorized persons any information concerning the NRC licensing examinations administered during the week(s) of JjJ3~ h i~lof(l From the date that I entered into this security agreement until the completion of examination administration, I did not instruct, evaluate, or provide performance feedback to those applicants who were administered these licensing examinations, except as specifically noted below and authorized by the NRC.

PRINTED NAME JOB TITLE / RESPONSIBILITY SIGNATURE (1) DATE DATE NOTE

1. Jlof Fe J IV. q J - - -It~;. . I_<(;. L. t.rAJ~*

.L..LI"').lL..1,C -: 4 ~J(:.: . . ;..--...,Li&t.&J~"C:ii~w~::.t:::!:~L':f__-

., ..:.....;:/lL:...W~yj;.L.-.):1&+:.(L:C.:lt:f4dL!:.:l--_./ ";!"Z;2
2. ----------G.t-l----------------r.,t----------

~. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

5. _

6 7

8 . _

9 . _

~~--------- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

12 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

13 --------------------------------------- - - - -

14 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - _

15.,-=- , _

NOTES ES-201, Page 27 of 28

~

2 Co.

ExaIIIlnation security AgfMflMlnt FOlIIJ ES-201-3

-- IV

~

III U1

1. Pre-ExamiNtion iy70 -1'1,11&/ I"~

I acknoWledge tha I have acquinId specialPed luIowIedge aboW the NRC licensing uaminations scheduled far the week(s) of 115 01 the date 01 my signalln.

  • agi8e tha& *
  • not kncMingIy divulge any idormation about these 8lC8I'I'IinUon5 to 8lYtJ persons .;,0 have nDl ~ auUlori2eQ by the C) NRC chief examiner.
  • understatld that
  • am not to insIruct. ev.aaae, or provide pettormance feedbllclt to those applicants scheduled to be a.dminisIefeQ

= U1es81icensing examinakNls from this date unti completion of examination adminisIraion. except .. specikally ncMd bela... and authorized by the NRC (a_g., adiog as a simulator booth opendQr or communicalDr is ac:c~ l h individuat doe, nat select the hining conIent or provide direct Of indW"ect feedback). Fur1hBrmore. I am aware of the phpical securiy m881U1'1J6 and requirementt (lIS documented in 1he facility licensee's procedures) and understand 1hat violation of h condiians of this agtHIIIeI1t mar result in c:an<l8IIaion of the e.aaninBtions ancUor an entarcement action ag8in&t me ar the facility icensee.

  • will immediately report to faciily management or 1M NRC chief examiner ant indiaIticns or suggestions . . . exarnftation secutily may have been compromised.
2. POIl,Epmlgiition To the beat of my know~ei.i#tnotdivulge to My unauIhorimd persons any information concerning Ihe NRC llcenling exwninPans adminislefed during the week(a) at 4:1- rom the dale thai I enered ink>. . security agreement WIIiI the completion of uamWIIion administraIicn. I did not ins1ruct. evaIuIIe. or provid8 performance feedbadc. to those appIicanb who W8t8 adrniniIIered these Iic8'lIing examitalions. ucept as ~ ncICIId below and Uhartz8d bv the NRC.

PRjNTED NAME JOB TITLE JRESPONSl8lUTY SIGNATURE (1) DATE

....oI Gl I

S E5-201. Page 27 of 28

  • ES-201 Examination Security Agreement Form ES*201-3
1. Pre-Examination 1\/ ~ -III r\. 1.00'1 I acknowledge that I have acquired specialized knowledge about the NRC licensing examinations scheduled for the week(s) of as of the date of my signature. I agree that I will not knowingly divulge any information about these examinations to any persons who have not been authorized by the NRC chief examiner. I understand that I am not to instruct. evaluate, or provide performance feedback to those applicants scheduled to be administered these licensing examinations from this date until completion of examination administration, except as specifically noted below and authorized by the NRC (e.g., acting as a simulator booth operator or communicator is acceptable if the individual does not select the training content or provide direct or indirect feedback). Furthermore, I am aware of the physical security measures and requirements (as documented in the facility licensee's procedures) and understand that violation of the conditions of this agreement may result in cancellation of the examinations and/or an enforcement action against me or the facility licensee. I will immediately report to facility management or the NRC chief examiner any indications or suggestions that examination security may have been compromised.
2. Post-Examination To the best of my knOW~dge'J!!tnot divulge to any unauthorized persons any information concerning the NRC licensing examinations administered during the week(s) of I Jl h I
  • rom the date that I entered into this security agreement until the completion of examination administration, I did not instruct. evaluate, or provide performance feedback to those applicants who were administered these licensing examinations, except as specifically noted below and authorized by the NRC.

ES-201, Page 27 of 28

ES-401 Record of Rejected KlAs Form ES-401-4 RO Tier / Randomly Reason for Rejection Group Selected KJA T2G1 2620002 K5.04 Importance Rating <2.5 and no K5s with IR > 2.5. Randomly became Reselected K6.02 262002 K6.02 T2G1 264000 K2.02 Importance Rating <2.5 and no K2s with IR > 2.5. Randomly became Reselected K3.02 264000K 3.02 T2G1 215005 K3.03 After the 264000 K2 was replaced with a K3, T2G 1 became became unbalanced with 3 K3s and only 1 K2. Randomly selected one of 215005 K2.02 the other two systems with K3s. Replaced with 215005 K2.02.

T2G2 201006 K2.01 Importance Rating <2.5 and the only K2 available. Randomly became selected K3.01 201006 K3.01 T2G2 272000 A4.06 After the 201006 K2 was reselected, there were not enough K2s became selected in T2G2 while the A4 category had 5 selected. Randomly 272000 K2.01 selected 272000 from that domain and then selected K2.01.

T2G2 268000 A3 NoA3 KAs. Randomly selected another system for an A3 topic, became RWCU. Then selected A3.05. (Any other reselection option would 204000 A3.05 have resulted in multiple reselections to flatten the distribution.)

T3 2.4.08 SG 2.4.08 selected in both T1 and T3. Replaced T3 2.4.08 with became 2.4.32.

2.4.32 T2G1 SSMP K5.06 SSMP is a Quad Cities specific system that was added to T2G1 in became agreement with the Chief Examiner. It was also agreed to use SSMP K5.02 RCIC, 217000, KA statements. The K5.06 sub-topic is "Turbine operation", a component that the SSMP does not have. K5.02, flow indication is viable.

T2G2 2900022.4.41 The original System Generic KIA statement (about EAL became classifications) could not be combined with the reactor vessel 290002 2.4.06 internals system to produce a psychometrically sound question at the RO level.

T2G1 215004 K2.01 215004 (SRM) has only one K2 (power supply to detector). This became KA combination was used on the Cert Exam and the resultant 215004 2.1.23 question would be a duplication. Randomly selected Generic to replace K2 and then selected an unused System Generic.

T1G1 295016 2.2.04 There are no differences between units (2.2.04) as applied to became control room abandonment. Reselected an unused System 295016 2.1.28 Generic KIA.

295016 2.1.28 Knowledge of purpose of major system component and controls became does not apply to Control Room abandonment because it is not a 2950162.1.20 system. Randomly selected an unused System Generic KIA.

RO Tier I Randomly Reason for Rejection Group Selected KiA T1G1 295019 AK2.19 There is no relationship between the Instrument Air system and became the RHR/LPCI. Randomly selected another K2 for that evolution.

295019 AK2.02 T1G2 295033 EA1.06 EA1.06 is has an asterisk with its importance rating, meaning became there was high variability in responses. At Quad Cities, High 295033 EA1.04 Secondary Containment Radiation procedures direct operators to use Radiation Protection Department personnel for survey support. There are no references available to support a question on use of "portable radiation monitoring instruments" related to high secondary containment radiation. Randomly selected another EA1 for this evolution.

295033 EA1.04 EA1.04 was rejected due to oversampling and a close relationship became with 261000 A3.01. Randomly selected another EA1 topic.

295033 EA1.01 T2G1 217000 K4.03 The concept of minimum flow protection was also sampled under became HPCI (206000 A2.06). Randomly selected another K4 for this 217000K4.02 system.

T1G1 295024 EA 2.06 This combination relates High OW Temp to Torus water temp.

became The High Torus water temp Emergency (295026) is also selected 295024 EA2.02 in T1 G1 and the High Torus water temp Abnormal (295013) is selected in T1 G2. To avoid oversampling, Randomly selected another EA2 for this evolution.

  • T2G1 T1G2 259002 AA2.09 became 259002 AA2.06 295008 AA 1.07 became 295008 AA 1.08 A 2.09 refers to the FWCI system failure alarm. FWCI is not applicable to Quad Cities. Randomly selected another AA2 topic.

Topic conflicts with T1G1 295005 AA1.04 which is also about the ability to trip the main turbine during high RPV water level conditions. Randomly selected another AA 1 topic.

T3 2.4.26 Reactor Operators at Quad Cities are not qualified to serve on the became Fire Brigade. This KIA was rejected at Oconee in June 2004 for 2.4.42 the same reason (precedent). Randomly reselected an unused Generic KIA.

T1G1 295025 2.2.40 Once in the EOPs for (Emergency Level) Reactor High Pressure, became the LCO for RPV pressure will be exited immediately due 295025 2.4.01 transition to Mode 3. Therefore could not write a psychometrically sound Question. Randomly reselected an unused Generic KIA.

ES-401 Record of Rejected KIAs Form ES-401-4 SRO Tier / Randomly Reason for Rejection Group Selected KJA SRO 295029 A2.01 No System Generics were originally selected in this Tier and Group.

T1G2 became Randomly selected 295029 and then selected SG 2.4.50 295029 2.4.50 SRO 295001 2.4.18 295001 is an Abnormal Evolution to which 2.4.18 "Knowledge of the T1G1 became specific bases of EOPs" does not apply. Randomly selected a 295001 2.4.04 System Generic KA.

SRO 295030 EA2.01 Questions on this evolution (Low Torus Water Level) conflict with a T1G1 became previously developed scenario transient. Randomly selected 295038 EA2.01 another evolution and randomly selected another A2 topic.

SRO 600000 2.2.39 2.2.39 was SRO knowledge of <1 hr Tech Specs which is also RO T1G1 became knowledge. Randomly selected an unused System Generic KA.

600000 2.4.30 SRO 295002 AA2.02 Evolution of loss of condenser vacuum was too similar to a T1G2 became simulator scenario. Randomly selected another evolution and 295014 AA2.01 randomly selected another A2 topic.

SRO 217000 2.4.21 RCIC is not an EGGS system and no credit is taken in the Safety T2G1 became Analysis. Therefore Generic KA 2.4.21 did not apply. Randomly 217000 2.1.32 selected an unused System Generic KA.

SRO 218000 A2.02 The A2.02 topic conflicts with a scenario event. Upon review, the T2G1 became only A2 topic that does not conflict with a scenario event or a written 218000 A2.03 question is A2.03.

SRO 262001 2.4.20 There are no applicable EOP warnings, cautions, or notes related to T2G1 became loss of AG power. Randomly selected an unused System Generic 262001 2.4.21 KA.

262001 2.4.21 Originally selected topic conflicted with Emergency topic 70oo in became T1 G1 on the RO exam. In order to provide better balance in T2G 1, 262001 A2.04 of the SRO exam, randomly reselected from the A2 category.

SRO

  • Tier I Group SRO T1G1 SRO Randomly Selected KIA 295028 EA2.05 became 295028 EA2.04 290003 2.4.01 Reason for Rejection Not able to construct a psychometrically sound question relating to the parameters. Randomly selected another EA2 topic.

No EOP conditions or immediate action steps apply to the Control T2G2 became Room HVAC system. Randomly reselected an unused System 2900032.2.44 Generic KIA.

SRO 295018 2.4.49 There are no immediate operator action statements in the Loss of T1G1 became CCW procedures from which to construct an SRO question. From 2950182.4.11 the unused System Generic KAs, randomly selected 2.2.36 and then 2.2.40, both of which relate Loss of CCW to Tech Specs.

However, there are no CCW LeOs. Randomly reselected another unused System Generic KIA.

SRO 2.1.44 Unable to construct a SRO level question about "Knowledge of RO T3 became duties" during refueling. From the unused System Generic KAs, 2.1.34 randomly selected 2.1.5, which was being used as the basis for a SRO JPM. Randomly reselected another unused System Generic KIA.

ES-403 Written Examination Grading Form ES-403-1 Quality Checklist Facility: Fermi Date of Exam: Exam Level: RO ~ SRO 0 Initials Item Descri tion a b c

1. Clean answer sheets copied before grading
2. Answer key changes and question deletions justified and documented
3. Applicants' scores checked for addition errors D'}.. ~ .A t- \'t"l"l 11- . ).;.r. .; .ev..;.,;i. .; .ew..;.,;. .; .e-:rs;,. .s:. J:. . :o. .; .t...;;.c.:....:.he.:...c:..;.k.:....>--=2..:..5°..;.,;~o;,...0.:...f-=e:..;..x:..:.;a.:....:.m-=in-=a-=t-=io..;.,;n..:..s )'-------+----+---+--+----:-=ID \."
4. Grading for all borderline cases (80 +/-2% overall and 70 or 80, I)/A as a licable, +/-4% on the SRO-onl ) reviewed in detail Vi
5. All other failing examinations checked to ensure that grades JIJ are 'ustified tv/It
6. Performance on missed questions checked for training deficiencies and wording problems; evaluate validity of ~W uestions missed b half or more of the a Iicants Printed Name/Signature Date
a. Grader
b. Facility Reviewer(*)
c. NRC Chief Examiner (*) \11.() I'}()() 9
d. NRC Supervisor (*) 117# t

(*) The facility reviewer's signature is not applicable for examinations graded by the NRC; two independent NRC reviews are required.

ES-403 Written Examination Grading Form ES-403*1 Quality Checklist Facility: Date of Exam: Exam Level: RO -. SRO!X!

Initials Item Description a b c

1. Clean answer sheets copied before grading ~ M!A \&\0
2. Answer key changes and question deletions justified ~Lv and documented ~(
3. Applicants' scores checked for addition errors P-\).

(reviewers spot check> 25% of examinations) ~

4. Grading for all borderline cases (80 +/-2% overall and 70 or 80, tt'4 ~

as applicable, +/-4% on the SRO-only) reviewed in detail

5. All other failing examinations checked to ensure that grades are justified AJIA ~\A
6. Performance on missed questions checked for training deficiencies and wording problems; evaluate validity ~II ~w of questions missed by half or more of the applicants

\J/

Printed Name/Signature Date

a. Grader ~ IZ/trltf/
b. Facility Reviewer(*) !JIlt NIA
c. NRC Chief Examiner (*) ~~~~tKuk~/~J~wJ~ \1.1'Jo/~2
d. NRC Supervisor (*) /!rcnoY~' JJk1f~Xd~ /", v

//?~(

(*) The facility reviewer's signature is not applicable for examinations graded by the NRC; two independent NRC reviews are required.

ES-403, Page 6 of 6