Text

Initial Exam 2009-302 Final Administrative Documents
	ML100670332
Person / Time
Site:	Turkey Point
Issue date:	12/11/2009
From:	; NRC/RGN-II
To:	; Florida Power & Light Co
References
	50-250/09-302, 50-251/09-302, ES-201, ES-201-1 50-250/09-302, 50-251/09-302
	Download: ML100670332 (57)
	v • d • e

{{#Wiki_filter:W~O~9-sYl2] -final-foODs-ms doc rxamination Preparation Checklist Form ES-201-1 Facility: ;;;/kt/y 8,,,1-Date of Examination: 1k1<#~Z; ~7 Developed by: Written - Facility jXf NRCD II Operating - Facility 1RI' NRCD Target Chief Date* Task Description (Reference) Examiner's Initials -180

1.

Examination administration date confirmed (C.1.a; C.2.a and b) 4;;1- -120

2.

NRC examiners and facility contact assigned (C.1.d; C.2.e) ,4j -120

3.

Facility contact briefed on security and other requirements (C.2.c) ~ i_ -120

4.

Corporate notification letter sent (C.2.d) Lj [-90] [5. Reference material due (C.1.e; C.3.c; Attachment 3)] l-j, {-75}

6.

Integrated examination outline(s) due, induding Forms ES-201-2, ES-201-3,

i ES-301-1, ES-301-2, ES-301-5, ES-D-1 's, ES-401-1/2, ES-401-3, and t

ES-401-4, as applicable (C.1.e and f; C.3.d) {-70} {7. Examination outline(s) reviewed by NRC and feedback provided to facility A;J. licensee (C.2.h; C.3.e)} {-45}

8.

Proposed examinations (induding written, walk-through JPMs, and scenarios, as applicable), supporting documentation (including Forms t ES-301-3, ES-301-4, ES-301-5, ES-301-6, and ES-401-6, and any Form /c ES-201-3 updates), and reference materials due (C.1.e, f, g and h; C.3.d) -30

9.

Preliminary license applications (NRC Form 398's) due (C.1.1; C.2.g; ); i ES-202) -14

10.

Final license applications due and Form ES-201-4 prepared (C.1.1; C.2.i;

&1 ES-202)

-14

11.

Examination approved by NRC supervisor for facility licensee review ,)j (C.2.h; C.3.f) -14

12.

Examinations reviewed with facility licensee (C.1.j; C.2.f and h; C.3.g) L~ -7

13.

Written examinations and operating tests approved by NRC supervisor .~j (C.2.i; C.3.h) -7

14.

Final applications reviewed; 1 or 2 (if >10) applications audited to confirm qualifications I eligibility; and examination approval and waiver letters sent /j (C.2.i; Attachment 5; ES-202, C.2.e; ES-204) 'f" -7

15.

Proctoringlwritten exam administration guidelines reviewed with facility licensee (C.3.k) ~J .v -7

16.

Approved scenarios, job performance measures, and questions t j. distributed to NRC examiners (C.3.i)

Target dates are generally based on facility-prepared examinations and are keyed to the examination date identified in the corporate notification letter. They are for planning purposes and may be adjusted on a case-by-case basis in coordination with the facility licensee.

[Applies only] {Does not apply} to examinations prepared by the NRC. W~O~9-sYl2] -final-foODs-ms doc rxamination Preparation Checklist Form ES-201-1 Facility: ;;;/kt/y 8,,,1-Date of Examination: 1k1<#~Z; ~7 Developed by: Written - Facility jXf NRCD II Operating - Facility 1RI' NRCD Target Chief Date* Task Description (Reference) Examiner's Initials -180

1.

Examination administration date confirmed (C.1.a; C.2.a and b) 4;;1- -120

2.

NRC examiners and facility contact assigned (C.1.d; C.2.e) ,4j -120

3.

Facility contact briefed on security and other requirements (C.2.c) ~j -120

4.

Corporate notification letter sent (C.2.d) Lj [-90] [5. Reference material due (C.1.e; C.3.c; Attachment 3)] l-j, {-75}

6.

Integrated examination outline(s) due, induding Forms ES-201-2, ES-201-3,

i ES-301-1, ES-301-2, ES-301-5, ES-D-1 's, ES-401-1/2, ES-401-3, and t

ES-401-4, as applicable (C.1.e and f; C.3.d) {-70} {7. Examination outline(s) reviewed by NRC and feedback provided to facility A;J. licensee (C.2.h; C.3.e)} {-45}

8.

Proposed examinations (induding written, walk-through JPMs, and scenarios, as applicable), supporting documentation (including Forms t ES-301-3, ES-301-4, ES-301-5, ES-301-6, and ES-401-6, and any Form /c ES-201-3 updates), and reference materials due (C.1.e, f, g and h; C.3.d) -30

9.

Preliminary license applications (NRC Form 398's) due (C.1.1; C.2.g; ); i ES-202) -14

10.

Final license applications due and Form ES-201-4 prepared (C.1.1; C.2.i;

&1 ES-202)

-14

11.

Examination approved by NRC supervisor for facility licensee review ,)j (C.2.h; C.3.f) -14

12.

Examinations reviewed with facility licensee (C.1.j; C.2.f and h; C.3.g) L~ -7

13.

Written examinations and operating tests approved by NRC supervisor .~j (C.2.i; C.3.h) -7

14.

Final applications reviewed; 1 or 2 (if >10) applications audited to confirm qualifications I eligibility; and examination approval and waiver letters sent /j (C.2.i; Attachment 5; ES-202, C.2.e; ES-204) 'f" -7

15.

Proctoringlwritten exam administration guidelines reviewed with facility licensee (C.3.k) ~J_ .v -7

16.

Approved scenarios, job performance measures, and questions t j. distributed to NRC examiners (C.3.i)

Target dates are generally based on facility-prepared examinations and are keyed to the examination date identified in the corporate notification letter. They are for planning purposes and may be adjusted on a case-by-case basis in coordination with the facility licensee.

[Applies only] {Does not apply} to examinations prepared by the NRC.

ES-201 Examination Outline Quality Checklist Form ES-201-2 Facility J; / P.t'1/ pP / ~ Date of Examination: A '-..I Ht1t~r :2.tX?9 Item 1 W R I T T E N

2.

S I M U L A T o R 3 W 1 T

4.

G E N E R A L I Task Description

a.

Verify that the outline(s) fit(s) the appropriate model, in accordance with ES-401.

b.

Assess whether the outline was systematically and randomly prepared in accordance with Section 0.1 of ES-401 and whether all KIA categories are appropriately sampled.

c. Assess whether the outline over-emphasizes any systems, evolutions, or generic topics.

d. Assess whether the justifications for deselected or rejected KIA statements are appropriate.

a.

Using Form ES-301-5, verify that the proposed scenario sets cover the required number of normal evolutions, instrument and component failures, technical specifications, and major transients.

b.

Assess whether there are enough scenario sets (and spares) to test the projected number and mix of applicants in accordance with the expected crew composition and rotation schedule without compromising exam integrity, and ensure that each applicant can be tested using at least one new or significantly modified scenario, that no scenarios are duplicated from the applicants' audit test(s), and that scenarios will not be repeated on subsequent days.

c.

To the extent possible, assess whether the outline(s) conform(s) with the qualitative and quantitative criteria specified on Form ES-301-4 and described in Appendix D.

a. Verify that the systems walk-through outline meets the criteria specified on Form ES-301-2:

(1) the outline(s) contain(s) the required number of control room and in-plant tasks distributed among the safety functions as specified on the form (2) task repetition from the last two NRC examinations is within the limits specified on the form (3) no tasks are duplicated from the applicants' audit test(s) (4) the number of new or modified tasks meets or exceeds the minimums specified on the form (5) the number of alternate path, low-power, emergency, and RCA tasks meet the criteria on the form.

b. Verify that the administrative outline meets the criteria specified on Form ES-301-1:

(1) the tasks are distributed among the topics as specified on the form (2) at least one task is new or significantly modified (3) no more than one task is repeated from the last two NRC licensing examinations

c.

Determine if there are enough different outlines to test the projected number and mix of applicants and ensure that no items are duplicated on subsequent days.

a.

Assess whether plant-specific priorities (including PRA and IPE insights) are covered in the appropriate exam sections.

b. Assess whether the 10 CFR 55.41/43 and 55.45 sampling is appropriate.

c.

Ensure that KIA importance ratings (except for plant-specific priorities) are at least 2.5.

d. Check for duplication and overlap among exam sections.

e. Check the entire exam for balance of coverage.

f.

Assess whether the exam fits the appropriate job level (RO or SRO).

a. Author

b. Facility Reviewer (*)

c. NRC Chief Examiner (#)

d. NRC Supervisor a

J/h'" /{4- /1- 'Iv-' Note:

Independent NRC reviewer initial items in Column "COO; chief examiner concurrence required.

Not applicable for NRC-prepared examination outlines Initials b*

C# 10::£1 1j I~ I.J) ( I~ J ES-201 Item 1 W R I T T E N

2.

S I M U L A T o R 3 W 1 T

4.

G E N E R A L Examination Outline Quality Checklist Date of Examination: A t1t~r :2.tX?q Task Description

a.

Veri~ that the outlineis) fit(SL the ap~rop!iate model, in accordance with ES-401.

b.

Assess whether the outline was systematically and randomly prepared in accordance with Section 0.1 of ES-401 and whether all KIA categories are appropriately sampled.

c. Assess whether the outline over-emphasizes any systems, evolutions, or generic topics.

d. Assess whether the justifications for deselected or rejected KIA statements are appropriate.

a.

Using Form ES-301-5, verify that the proposed scenario sets cover the required number of normal evolutions, instrument and component failures, technical specifications, and maior transients.

b.

Assess whether there are enough scenario sets (and spares) to test the projected number and mix of applicants in accordance with the expected crew composition and rotation schedule without compromising exam integrity, and ensure that each applicant can be tested using at least one new or significantly modified scenario, that no scenarios are duplicated from the applicants' audit tes1(s), and that scenarios will not be repeated on subsequent days.

c.

To the extent possible, assess whether the outline(s) conform(s) with the qualitative and quantitative criteria specified on Form ES-301-4 and described in Appendix D.

a. Verify that the systems walk-through outline meets the criteria specified on Form ES-301-2:

(1) the outline(s) contain(s) the required number of control room and in-plant tasks distributed among the safety functions as specified on the form (2) task repetition from the last two NRC examinations is within the limits specified on the form (3) no tasks are duplicated from the applicants' audit test(s) (4) the number of new or modified tasks meets or exceeds the minimums specified on the form (5) the number of alternate path, low-power, emergency, and RCA tasks meet the criteria on the form.

b. Verify that the administrative outline meets the criteria speCified on Form ES-301-1:

(1) the tasks are distributed among the topics as specified on the form (2) at least one task is new or significantly modified (3) no more than one task is repeated from the last two NRC licensing examinations

c.

Determine if there are enough different outlines to test the projected number and mix of applicants and ensure that no items are duplicated on subsequent days.

a.

Assess whether plant-specific priorities (including PRA and IPE insights) are covered in the appropriate exam sections.

b. Assess whether the 10 CFR 55.41/43 and 55.45 sampling is appropriate.

c.

Ensure that KIA importance ratings (except for plant-specific priorities) are at least 2.5.

d. Check for duplication and overlap among exam sections.

e. Check the entire exam for balance of coverage.

f.

Assess whether the exam fits the appropriate job level (RO or SRO).

a. Author

b. Facility Reviewer (*)

c. NRC Chief Examiner (#)

d. NRC Supervisor Form ES-201-2 Initials a

b* c# ~IO:-£; 1:. j * /~I~ ( Note:

Independent NRC reviewer initial items in Column "COO; chief examiner concurrence required.

Not applicable for NRC-prepared examination outlines

Y',. 1Ll.. 1t:; IttfJ~ I 11-ES-201 Examination Security Agreement Form ES-201-3

1.

Pre-Examination I acknowledge that I have acquired specialized knowledge about the NRC licensing examinations scheduled for the weekes) of fj!'"1!z"OfJCj as of the date of my signature. I agree that I will not knowingly divulge any information about these examinations to any persons who have not been authorized by the NRC chief examineL I understand that I am not to instruct, evaluate, or provide performance feedback to those applicants scheduled to be administered these licensing examinations from this date until completion of examination administration, except as specifically noted below and authorized by the NRC (e.g., acting as a simulator booth operator or communicator is acceptable if the individual does not select the training content or provide direct or indirect feedback). Furthermore, I am aware of the physical security measures and requirements (as documented in the facility licensee's procedures) and understand that violation of the conditions of this agreement may result in cancellation of the examinations and/or an enforcement action against me or the facility licensee, I will immediately report to facility management or the NRC chief examiner any indications or suggestions that examination security may have been compromised.

2.

Post-Examination To the best of my knowled e, I did not divulge to any unauthorized persons any information concerning the NRC licensing examinations administered during the weekes) of 11'1 '1.1>19 From the date that I entered into this security agreement until the completion of examination administration, I did not instruct, evaluate, or provide performance feedback to those applicants who were administered these licensing examinations, except as specifically noted below and authorized by the NRC. PRINTED NAME JOB TITLE / RESPONSIBILITY SIGNATURE (2) DATE NOTE

?;

,~~\\l ~~oJ: ~-;Jft:'j~%V7l?X

. ~ 3.1:lJ-1 'y! 4/71.5 pfAa1 bfiVEid2$1? ~ 4, ~6M 1Ai\\::,vou.-> ~)n e".vo.Cl. ~- ),J C'i

5. ~~

M"""~lIewi!i?lL 6*?=a~ &,,v>; -L>-::2:l

7.

,.,tc

?)!,,)

S'tM !ffGR. .C-.._ ~-o I

(/'"ev.c

~~ ";/2i).y 7.f.:L-

10. ('1\\ LAve,+! '-;r,J 3(2'-(0,

~J~

11. -:'" ~

~ ~"

12. t!J~4t2eN)OIi!t;

{,. t:> i 13 ~~(-'*'<.II ,"",Ie,? if2'C ';"'ok

14. "2i;:A).)

Q-co,v'\\ b1\\\\b\\' t) ln~~ 1(:; "// "5 (I c' -",,~ 'j' ;('~ ~ "'!}JV/,.t'>f ~', ',,,.,].)(, Jf,~'," I* L<: ** -~..;:;::::..~ /, ~/, I --!./....L# '.:1....L.- N0'tJ~,,"t.,~ /'PC cUP! /'1/ ?'m4'/ -.J.eP t,/~/.p/!J*- {J"f9 'Co ES-201 J Page 26 of 27 f'J ./I 1':. I - ES-201 Examination Security Agreement Form ES-201-3

1.

Pre-Examination I acknowledge that I have acquired specialized knowledge about the NRC licensing examinations scheduled for the weekes) of fj!'"1!z"OfJCj as of the date of my signature. I agree that I will not knowingly divulge any information about these examinations to any persons who have not been authorized by the NRC chief examiner. I understand that I am not to instruct, evaluate, or provide performance feedback to those applicants scheduled to be administered these licensing examinations from this date until completion of examination administration, except as specifically noted below and authorized by the NRC (e.g., acting as a simulator booth operator or communicator is acceptable if the individual does not select the training content or provide direct or indirect feedback). Furthermore, I am aware of the physical security measures and requirements (as documented in the facility licensee's procedures) and understand that violation of the conditions of this agreement may result in cancellation of the examinations and/or an enforcement action against me or the facility licensee. I will immediately report to facility management or the NRC chief examiner any indications or suggestions that examination security may have been compromised.

2.

Post-Examination To the best of my knowled e, I did not divulge to any unauthorized persons any information concerning the NRC licensing examinations administered during the weekes) of 11"1 '1..1>19 From the date that I entered into this security agreement until the completion of examination administration, I did not instruct, evaluate, or provide performance feedback to those applicants who were administered these licensing examinations, except as specifically noted below and authorized by the NRC. SIGNATURE (2) DATE NOTE ES-201, Page 26 of 27

~~ ES*201 Examination SecurftyAgrEt_Em1~___ _ Form I:S*201-3

1.

fr,-iillBmma!l01l -, acknowledge that I have acquired specialized knowledge about the NRC licensing examinations scheduled for the week(s) of flh'1/v!!j. as ofthe date of my signature. I agree that I will not knoWingly divulge any information about these examinations to any persons who have not been authorized by the NRC chief examiner. I understand that I am not to instruct, evaluate, or provide performance feedback to those applicants scheduled to be administered these ficemiling examinations from this date until completion of examination administration, except as specifically noted below and, authorized by the NRC (e.g., acting as a simulator boottkoperator or communicator is acceptable lfthe Individual does not select the training content or provide direct or indirect feedback). Furthermore. I am aware of the phySical security measures and requirements (as documented in the facility licensee's procedures) and understand that Violation of the conditions of this agreement may result In cancellation of the examinatlons andior an enforcement action against me or the facility licensee. 'will Immediately report to facillty management or the NRC chief examiner any indications or suggestions that examination security may have been compromised.

2.

po!t-EximimAt!go To the best of my kn0:t2e, I did not divulge to any unauthorized persons any information concerning the NRC licensing examinations administered during the week(s) of 1. Clh 1.-"1 From the date that 1 entered into this security agreement until the completion of examination administration. I did not instruct, evaluate. or provide performance feedback to those applicants who ware administered these licensing examinations, except as specifically noted below and authorized by the NRC. _t!:_titNt ~~e;oQ'" =>~~~.z:;:.=-: ~.(" -D",.",,,,, 'l!:.E:C~~'~""-C?~*,~'fi*~~~~ ~~~~~= ~:,_~.vN ~~U~~W;~R:-==== ~~~ ~~~~~~- L~&~ ~~~~~=m~~~= ,~,_,

~l

~~ ES-201, Page 26 of 27 ES*201 Examination Security Agreement Form ES.201-3

1.

fr,-iiIlBmma!l01l " acknowledge that I have acquired specialized knowledge about the NRC licensing examinations scheduled for the week(s) of flh'1/v!!j. as ofthe date of my signature. I agree that I will not knoWingly divulge any information about these examinations to any persons who have not been authorized by the NRC chief examiner. I understand that I am not to instruct, evaluate, or provide performance feedback to those applicants scheduled to be administered these ficemiling examinations from this date until completion of examination administration, except as specifically noted below and, authorized by the NRC (e.g., acting as a simulator boottkoperator or communicator is acceptable lfthe Individual does not select the training content or provide direct or indirect feedback). Furthermore. I am aware of the phySical security measures and requirements (as documented in the facility licensee's procedures) and understand that Violation of the conditions of this agreement may result In cancellation of the examinatlons andior an enforcement action against me or the facility licensee. 'will Immediately report to facillty management or the NRC chief examiner any indications or suggestions that examination security may have been compromised.

2.

Po!t-Eximioitigo To the best of my kn0j;1e, I did not divulge to any unauthorized persons any information concemlng the NRC licensing examinations administered during the week(s) of 1. CL 1.#t1P1 From the date that 1 entered into this security agreement until the completion of examination administration. I did not instruct, evaluate. or provide performance feedback to those applicants who ware administered these licensing examinations, except as specifically noted below and authorized by the NRC. ES-201, Page 26 of 27

tf?jt ~ 1!L ,~'i.t*', ES-201 Examination Security Agreement Form ES-201-3

1.

Pre-Examination I acknowledge that I have acquired specialized knowledge about the NRC licensing examinations scheduled for the week(s) of gJ; -; 4,'Otj as of the date of my signature. I agree that I will not knowingly divulge any information about these examinations to any persons who have notbeen authorized by the NRC chief examiner. I understand that I am not to instruct, evaluate, or provide performance feedback to those applicants scheduled to be administered these licensing examinations from this date until completion of examination administration, except as specifically noted below and authorized by the NRC (e.g., acting as a simulator booth operator or communicator is acceptable if the individual does not select the training content or provide direct or indirect feedback). Furthermore, I am aware of the physical security measures and requirements (as documented in the facility licensee's procedures) and understand that violation of the conditions of this agreement may result in cancellation of the examinations and/or an enforcement action against me or the facility licensee. I will immediately report to facility management or the NRC chief examiner any indications or suggestions that examination security may have been compromised.

2.

Post-Examination , I did not divulge to any unauthorized persons any information concerning the NRC licensing examinations administered during the week(s) of 5ijt1A't-'t} From the date that I entered into this security agreement until the completion of examination administration, I did not instruct, evaluate, or provide performance feedback to those applicants who were administered these licensing examinations, except as specifically noted below and authorized by the NRC. PRINTED NAME JOB TITLE I RESPONSIBILITY DATE ~RE (2) DATE NOTE

1. ~~

... _\\ W. ~~%~ 1f:'-t:tw... ~,uu..... )'Oor'I)~ I ~tt-0 tf IJ~, __

2. Tr6?H.~./z~

i!yA,.., 6VAlV""XX /S/20 ~~ 3.1':1> ._ "5 I'! R,c..o ~

4. \\ C \\ roO,. El.dCh*,:JS Su..PPDC*-t SYxfY

.!i:::....Lg~

5. f.thlt:.,

e:OJJ SIM ~tJqL! Il-. -6

6.

\\. oIL'£(- Mt'yS <' II 51 M 6-~ t c

)

7. n7Zh *./ =;r t '0;),""

0 per""1(:.. A 0 '" (,"'" 'j J.

8. ~4£ ~/~~

kb P 'l'tf!47:'W 'II ~

9.,ccfrC,,&:h0 Y,'1d-

~ M~-V'.\\0r.: (

10. A \\

leer Rc. o 7*t"rf J:..oc::..~

11.

LOCI ,;V <)TIC"d TU('- 2-2-"\\ 1,21-7

12.

GAil'( ~

13.

~ l>-~~ ~~

14.

T%: 1;1KJ, =<<;.. I>

15. M \\ ( 1.Lk\\;"-

e.My\\ v." /'n, ( )~ NOT~SOH,v EAn~ D-PS M.!NTOIZ ES-201 Examination Security Agreement Form ES-201-3

1.

Pre-Examination I acknowledge that I have acquired specialized knowledge about the NRC licensing examinations scheduled for the week(s) of W/'14,,()t-. as of the date of my signature. I agree that I will not knowingly divulge any information about these examinations to any persons who have not been authorized by the NRC chief examiner. I understand that I am not to instruct, evaluate, or provide performance feedback to those applicants scheduled to be administered these licensing examinations from this date until completion of examination administration, except as specifically noted below and authorized by the NRC (e.g., acting as a simulator booth operator or communicator is acceptable if the individual does not select the training content or provide direct or indirect feedback). Furthermore, I am aware of the physical security measures and requirements (as documented in the facility licensee's procedures) and understand that violation of the conditions of this agreement may result in cancellation of the examinations and/or an enforcement action against me or the facility licensee. I will immediately report to facility management or the NRC chief examiner any indications or suggestions that examination security may have been compromised.

2.

Post-Examination , I did not divulge to any unauthorized persons any information concerning the NRC licensing examinations administered during the week(s) of .,() t From the date that I entered into this security agreement until the completion of examination administration, I did not instruct, evaluate, or provide performance feedback to those applicants who were administered these licensing examinations, except as specifically noted below and authorized by the NRC.

G .e e jJUY ~ i 1-- fa ES*201 Examination Security Agreement Form ES*201*3

1.

Pre-Examination I acknowledge that I have acquired specialized knowledge about the NRC licensing examinations scheduled for the week(s) of '8/1 J 10 1 as of the date of my signature. I agree that I will not knowingly divulge any information about these examinations to any persons who have not been authorized by the NRC chief examiner. I understand that I am not to instruct, evaluate, or provide performance feedback to those applicants scheduled to be administered these licensing examinations from this date until completion of examination administration, except as specifically noted below and authorized by the NRC (e.g., acting as a simulator booth operator or communicator is acceptable if the individual does not select the training content or provide direct or indirect feedback). Furthermore, I am aware of the physical security measures and requirements (as documented in the facility licensee's procedures) and understand that violation of the conditions of this agreement may result in cancellation of the examinations and/or an enforcement action against me or the facility licensee. I will immediately report to facility management or the NRC chief examiner any indications or suggestions that examination security may have been compromised.

2.

Post-Examination I did not divulge to any unauthorized persons any information concerning the NRC licensing examinations administered during the week(s) of 4' ZGJ~ From the date that I entered into this security agreement until the completion of examination administration, I did not instruct, evaluate, or provide pe ormance feedback to those applicants who were administered these licensing examinations, except as specifically noted below and authorized by the NRC. PRINTED NAME JOB TITLE / RESPONSIBILITY DATE

1. J~ ~"HJ~

111M SIAN,If-CO

t.

D9

3.

N~1. c:~'\\ 'TVtU ~~ I

4. ;U..m ~~/VtJ RcO

-~

5. ~8:l C1h$1i'&1,cit SiVf'O

'I ~"j)'.-4-71'¥~~~~1§l-- ~¥~ I ~~ / ~f7o'

8. ~~I'3t _-"S~tLc::>=--=_f ____

9.

'<!.g;'t't'I¥-~ ]?'0T&t:TZS.oW cRS S\\4.D c<~.\\.,.Lk

10.

e iJa ~ ;So t?odr-; 1>(:(2 -SJ'lPO ~~~ ~~:. ~~~~~~o---------------,~~~~---------

13.

Sg-a KI~t'VJ

-I ~

14. ~? S'~

-r,,\\;:;~ A

7.

SZ(>>~') ¢{tUnC4;;;9

15. ":::Jntf tJ ~-r{!)1'J

&. p<'fo,}v1 \\/t.-r d:, c;rrr 0..../ ___ 7 r I< p6/ NOTES: ~T~dt-- 7/>1"; :) rJrJ4 .513/ /9 i.~ ,..>._-r-I"~ G....

e ES*201 Examination Security Agreement Form ES*201*3

1.

Pre-Examination I acknowledge that I have acquired specialized knowledge about the NRC licensing examinations scheduled for the week(s) of '8/1 J 10 1 as of the date of my signature. I agree that I will not knowingly divulge any information about these examinations to any persons who have not been authorized by the NRC chief examiner. I understand that I am not to instruct, evaluate, or provide performance feedback to those applicants scheduled to be administered these licensing examinations from this date until completion of examination administration, except as specifically noted below and authorized by the NRC (e.g., acting as a simulator booth operator or communicator is acceptable if the individual does not select the training content or provide direct or indirect feedback). Furthermore, I am aware of the physical security measures and requirements (as documented in the facility licensee's procedures) and understand that violation of the conditions of this agreement may result in cancellation of the examinations and/or an enforcement action against me or the facility licensee. I will immediately report to facility management or the NRC chief examiner any indications or suggestions that examination security may have been compromised.

2.

Post-Examination I did not divulge to any unauthorized persons any information concerning the NRC licensing examinations administered during the week(s) of . From the date that I entered into this security agreement until the completion of examination administration, I did not instruct, evaluate, or provide pe ormance feedback to those applicants who were administered these licensing examinations, except as specifically noted below and authorized by the NRC.

/0/' !:L i ;t ES-201 Examination Security Agreement Form ES-201-3

1.

Pre-Examination I acknowledge that I have acquired specialized knowledge about the NRC licensing examinations scheduled for the week(s) of ~ as of the date of my signature. I agree that I will not knowingly divulge any information about these examinations to any persons who have not been authorized by the NRC chief examiner. I understand that I am not to instruct, evaluate, or provide performance feedback to those applicants scheduled to be administered these licensing examinations from this date until completion of examination administration, except as specifically noted below and authorized by the NRC (e.g., acting as a simulator booth operator or communicator is acceptable if the individual does not select the training content or provide direct or indirect feedback). Furthermore, I am aware of the physical security measures and requirements (as documented in the facility licensee's procedures) and understand that violation of the conditions of this agreement may result in cancellation of the examinations and/or an enforcement action against me or the facility licensee. I will immediately report to facility management or the NR C chief examiner any indications or suggestions that examination security may have been compromised.

2.

Post-Examination To the best of my knowle ge, I did not divulge to any unauthorized persons any information concerning the NRC licensing examinations administered during the week(s) of . From the date that I entered into this security agreement until the completion of examination administration, I did not instruct, evaluate, or pr vi e p rformance feedback to those applicants who were administered these licensing examinations, except as specifically noted below and authorized by the NRC. PRINTED NAME JOB TITLE I RESPONSIBILITY SIGNATURE (1) DATE DATE NOTE oPS {'-I f (Je e.T

2.

lL-I)-"e((',nf > ~ I ~~

3. grp ~ r~~~UY VWV;rstLjO

~ ~

4.

G-~ \\.q....,~ \\. D T.-nl Cell'" ~ ~: /J

7.

8. ______________________________________

9. ______________________________________

10.

11.

12.

13.

14.

15.

NOTES: I ES-201 Examination Security Agreement Form ES-201-3

1.

Pre-Examination I acknowledge that I have acquired specialized knowledge about the NRC licensing examinations scheduled for the week(s) of ~ as of the date of my signature. I agree that I will not knowingly divulge any information about these examinations to any persons who have not been authorized by the NRC chief examiner. I understand that I am not to instruct, evaluate, or provide performance feedback to those applicants scheduled to be administered these licensing examinations from this date until completion of examination administration, except as specifically noted below and authorized by the NRC (e.g., acting as a simulator booth operator or communicator is acceptable if the individual does not select the training content or provide direct or indirect feedback). Furthermore, I am aware of the physical security measures and requirements (as documented in the facility licensee's procedures) and understand that violation of the conditions of this agreement may result in cancellation of the examinations and/or an enforcement action against me or the facility licensee. I will immediately report to facility management or the NR C chief examiner any indications or suggestions that examination security may have been compromised.

2.

Post-Examination To the best of my knowle ge, I did not divulge to any unauthorized persons any information concerning the NRC licensing examinations administered during the week(s) of . From the date that I entered into this security agreement until the completion of examination administration, I did not instruct, evaluate, or pr vi e p rformance feedback to those applicants who were administered these licensing examinations, except as specifically noted below and authorized by the NRC. PRINTED NAME JOB TITLE I RESPONSIBILITY SIGNATURE (1) DATE DATE NOTE oPS {'-I f(Je e.T Jill ( ~ '1 2'-T.~~~~~~7r.r- __ ~>~nw~~_/~* ~----------------~~~~---'-7~--- ~~---~-~~~~-~---~~~~~~~-~-~-~-~-7--fi.'Lb~ 3.~~~~~~~~ _ _ ~~~~/~~S~~~.~~ ______________ ~~~~~~~~~___ ~. 4.~~~~~~~ JG~r~n~1~C~e~A~<1~ ______________ ~~~~~~======~_

5. ____________________________________________________________ --------hi------- _____ _

6. ________________________________________________________________________ _

7. ___________________________________________________________________________ _

8. __________________________________________________________________ _

9. _______________________________________________________________ _

10. _________________________________________________________________ _

11. ______________________________________________________________ _

12. _______________________________________________________________ _

13. _______________________________________________________________ _

14. ________________________________________________________________ _

15. ________________________________________________________________ _

NOTES: I

"ILL 15 Itr@-- ! 11-ES-201 Examination SecurityAgreement Form ES-201-3

1.

Pre-Examination I acknowledge that I have acquired specialized knowledge about the NRC licensing examinations scheduled for the week(s) of '5!I,lv()(;Cj as of the date of my signature. I agree that I will not knowingly divulge any information about these examinations to any persons who have not been authorized by the NRC chief examiner. I understand that I am not to instruct, evaluate, or provide performance feedback to those applicants 'scheduled to be administered these licensing examinations from this date until completion of examination administration, except as specifically noted below and authorized by the NRC (e.g., acting as a simulator booth operator or communicator is acceptable if the individual does not select the training content or provide direct or indirect feedback). Furthermore, I am aware of the physical security measures and requirements (as documented in the facility licensee's procedures) and understand that violation of the conditions of this agreement may result in cancellation of the examinations and/or an enforcement action against me or the facility licensee. I will immediately report to facility management or the NRC chief examiner any indications or suggestions that examination security may have been compromised.

2.

Post-Examination To the best of my knowled~e, I did not divulge to any unauthorized persons any information concerning the NRC licensing examinations administered during the week(s) of 'In 'Z.DtPj From the date that I entered into this security agreement until the completion of examination administration, I did not instruct, evaluate, or provide performance feedback to those applicants who were administered these licensing examinations, except as specifically noted below and authorized by the NRC. PRINTED NAME JOB TITLE / RESPONSIBILITY DATE NOTE ~: ~~;~EJJt:;~~~e.2:?i/t!!iT£1{

3. _~I "yJ7JJJ7IL CrAM

b£VEL.£)£!7

4.

aM \\Ai ~yVOl: t.,.,...)i "f~f." v VI G" ~ ~ ) fIr /:'q;v f _ 1:::;;>j.;;S(kVH ~ ~

5.

O~ t5WtR*W5.- ~ ~~ ~~o/~~~ ~ (t~~7E:

9.

r.,Pc) tT;:J: 1 O. (. VI LA V G~ i..;r """' K 0 F (r?~ :1 :-1.::-1... Sf Z Co I 0,_-" .... ~ 7'P"c;.v.>o..\\-@(O'iYi<"""V"i=""'"O'--- 1 'A h ~!;A.,¥<-. -=:r-- orn~

11. -:

$L..~ ~1.....- CS> iV\\ M~ ~':' ~~ i'

12. J:r;f0jJzetVJot'$ ~

FW1itJN~~ ~ t::> ~.:::.::::::, '"4

13. ~:C\\ \\7>2-/1

( T*.~? q/IC(). JslL

14. 2;:;;AW

~tJ\\ S'Y..D 0"' _-.,£m=-¥ _______ ~.L.- ~~~~:,t:; N{<?-l;l;;O hV (?inq'/-~ep ~~ ~8 :~O) ~--=v JiO/>iL ES-201, Page 26 of 27 ES-201 Examination Security Agreement Form ES-201-3

1.

Pre-Examination I acknowledge that I have acquired specialized knowledge about the NRC licensing examinations scheduled for the week(s) of '5!I,lv()(;Cj as of the date of my signature. I agree that I will not knowingly divulge any information about these examinations to any persons who have not been authorized by the NRC chief examiner. I understand that I am not to instruct, evaluate, or provide performance feedback to those applicants 'scheduled to be administered these licensing examinations from this date until completion of examination administration, except as specifically noted below and authorized by the NRC (e.g., acting as a simulator booth operator or communicator is acceptable if the individual does not select the training content or provide direct or indirect feedback). Furthermore, I am aware of the physical security measures and requirements (as documented in the facility licensee's procedures) and understand that violation of the conditions of this agreement may result in cancellation of the examinations and/or an enforcement action against me or the facility licensee. I will immediately report to facility management or the NRC chief examiner any indications or suggestions that examination security may have been compromised.

2.

Post-Examination To the best of my knowled~e, I did not divulge to any unauthorized persons any information concerning the NRC licensing examinations administered during the week(s) of 'In 'Z.DtPj From the date that I entered into this security agreement until the completion of examination administration, I did not instruct, evaluate, or provide performance feedback to those applicants who were administered these licensing examinations, except as specifically noted below and authorized by the NRC. DATE NOTE ES-201, Page 26 of 27

J

-.j ~ :: .~:

t

..L,,! '.~ "ILL. 1<; fftff- _L ( 1-ES.. 201 ~ .. ~___E!amlnation Security Agreement Form ES*201*3

1.

Pre-examination I acknowledge that I have acquired specialized knowledge about the NRC licensing examinations scheduled for the week(s) of DIr'1 !7>-t¥j as of the date of my signature, I agree that I will not knowingly divulge any information about these examinations to any persons who have not been authorized by the NRC chief examiner. I understand that I am not to instruct, evaluate, or provide performance feedback to those applicants scheduled to be administered these licensing examinations from this date until completion of examination administration, except as specifically noted belovo!. and authorized by the NRC (e.g., acting as a simulator booth, operator or communIcator is acceptable If the individual does not select the training content or provide direct or indirect feedback). Furthermore, I am aware of the phYSical security measures and requirements (as documented in the facility licensee's procedures) and understand that violation of the conditions of this agreement may result in cancellation of the examinations and/or an enforcement action against me or the faciHty licensee. f will immediately report to facility management or the NRC chief examiner any indications or suggestions that examination security may have been compromised.

2.

Post-EMmlnatlon To the best of my knoWledte, I dId not divulge to any unauthorized persons any information concerning the NRC licensing examinations administered during the week(s) of 'PIn '2,DtfJ1 From the date that J entered into this security agreement until the completion of examination administration. I did not instruct. evaluate, or provide performance feedback to those applicants who were administered these licensing examInations, except as specifically noted below and authorized by the NRC. PRINTED NAME JOB TITLE! RESPONSIBILITY DATE NOTE

1. 01;v Go tV 13 T P-l 0' Lc G MrY\\ () C., G" tJ l.J!:!t-

2. ~:/:: III d&iY4i!4ik lP>#M 2!trt/fL?JCM.

3. _~(.-,'J1lii.1T1.L e(Aja X>&; YEW$!?

~CJ~M

~~~~-' ~1Zfe-.c¥ ~:.3 ~Oi*~w -S't!1~Ai1""""",,-fi:'M""I!. =§--I('-, ----~~~~~~==~~ ~<;:mF= "f:;,'&:r~o&

];

~~t"¥"",~:;::::=':i;,j.,-~-~-~-,=-~~

10. ~

(.AUG~ 0;v go =t= _,. 11.~* ~~

12. =';~f;2eraoll:a:

~t; '1:f1P"~ CfJI!W{ W" {"I("g b~~

13.

J~c-1710( I"'" i 14.S~ ~

15. ~

5r;;/kZI' NOTES:

ES-201, Page 26 of 27

1LuLE:L

....t:."":.s.~~. r;}", ~"F'I =---

i[~UzH'

~ ..JiO/§L... '.~ ES.. 201 Examination Security Agreement

1.

Pre-examination [acknowledge that I have acquired specialized knowledge about the NRC licensing examinations scheduled for the week(s) of DIr'1 !7>-t¥j as of the date of my signature, I agree that I will not knowingly divulge any information about these examinations to any persons who have not been authorized by the NRC chief examiner. I understand that I am not to instruct, evaluate, or provide performance feedback to those applicants scheduled to be administered these licensing examinations from this date until completion of examination administration, except as specifically noted belovo/. and '! authorized by the NRC (e.g., acting as a simulator booth, operator or communicator is acceptable If the individual does not select the training content or provide direct or indirect feedback), Furthermore, I am aware of the phYSical security measures and requirements (as documented in the facility licensee's procedures) and understand that violation of the conditions of this agreement may result in cancellation of the examinations and/or an enforcement action against me or the faciHty licensee. f will immediately report to facifity management or the NRC chief examiner any indications or suggestions that examination security may have been compromised.

2.

Post-EMmlnatlon To the best of my knowledte, I did not divulge to any unauthorized persons any information concerning the NRC licensing examinations administered during the week(s) of 'PIn '2,DtfJ1 From the date that J entered into this security agreement until the completion of examination administration, I did not instruct, evaluate, or provide performance feedback to those applicants who were administered these licensing examinations, except as specifically noted below and authorized by the NRC. DATE NOTE ES-201, Page 26 of 27

rP?Jt ~ i!1 ES-201 Examination Security Agreement Form ES-201-3

1.

Pre-Examination I acknowledge that I have acquired specialized knowledge about the NRC licensing examinations scheduled for the week(s) of ;jJ; / /;J[JOtj as of the date of my signature. I agree that I will not knowingly divulge any information about these examinations to any persons who have not been authorized by the NRC chief examiner. I understand that I am not to instruct, evaluate, or provide performance feedback to those applicants scheduled to be administered these licensing examinations from this date until completion of examination administration, except as specifically noted below and authorized by the NRC (e.g., acting as a simulator booth operator or communicator is acceptable if the individual does not select the training content or provide direct or indirect feedback). Furthermore, I am aware of the physical security measures and requirements (as documented in the facility licensee's procedures) and understand that violation of the conditions of this agreement may result in cancellation of the examinations and/or an enforcement action against me or the facility licensee. I will immediately report to facility management or the NRC chief examiner any indications or suggestions that examination security may have been compromised.

2.

Post-Examination To the best of my knowl g, I did not divulge to any unauthorized persons any information concerning the NRC licensing examinations administered during the week(s) of '/7, 21£.7 From the date that I entered into this security agreement until the completion of examination administration, I did not instruct, evaluate, or provide performance feedback to those a pplicants who were administered these licensing examinations, except as specifically noted below and authorized by the NRC. PRINTED NAME JOB TITLE / RESPONSIBILITY DATE DATE NOTE

1. ~).J(~_\\ W. ~

~~~ I{;'-'(I:W... ~ \\I~L"'~I\\.. I ~lt-o 'i (n{01 __

2.

&.4,." 6YAl v""NX / SJ2 0

r-:t;: __

3.

I_ I R..~(J ~ SLLppo,'\\ Sw"(N 9_:~.1i~ SIM ~&JI}t.. il- '. -0 5/.Nt ~,(,- ~ ~) Oek4t"~ i\\on """;'1 J. l?b 'Ptt47i'W '/1 ~ UYI,:j- . /'VV:'0t< &(.0 HLL-

11.

L.oCi 1/V1TiltfuiZ '6 -u~7- __

12.

0A~ jI-_ -

13.

o~

14.

T~ 0'1 __ 1 5. fJ\\ \\ C LiA"c'l. ~.J ,-.I Eo)I..A-.M "oJ I'n- ( ) tL-v +.::;--;-h __ NOT~S6HrJ EAnt-J Dj?S MtI'JT£'/Z '6(?I(er ES-201 Examination Security Agreement Form ES-201-3

1.

Pre-Examination I acknowledge that I have acquired specialized knowledge about the NRC licensing examinations scheduled for the week(s) of ;jJ; / /;J[JOtj as of the date of my signature. I agree that I will not knowingly divulge any information about these examinations to any persons who have not been authorized by the NRC chief examiner. I understand that I am not to instruct, evaluate, or provide performance feedback to those applicants scheduled to be administered these licensing examinations from this date until completion of examination administration, except as specifically noted below and authorized by the NRC (e.g., acting as a simulator booth operator or communicator is acceptable if the individual does not select the training content or provide direct or indirect feedback). Furthermore, I am aware of the physical security measures and requirements (as documented in the facility licensee's procedures) and understand that violation of the conditions of this agreement may result in cancellation of the examinations and/or an enforcement action against me or the facility licensee. I will immediately report to facility management or the NRC chief examiner any indications or suggestions that examination security may have been compromised.

2.

Post-Examination To the best of my knowl g, I did not divulge to any unauthorized persons any information concerning the NRC licensing examinations administered during the week(s) of '/7, 21£.7 From the date that I entered into this security agreement until the completion of examination administration, I did not instruct, evaluate, or provide performance feedback to those a pplicants who were administered these licensing examinations, except as specifically noted below and authorized by the NRC. PRINTED NAME ~)J(",_\\ W. ~ ~~~ JOB TITLE / RESPONSIBILITY DATE DATE NOTE I{;'-'(I:W... ~\\I~L"'~I\\.. I ~lt-o _--="'----="'---____ ~(f1{01 __ 6!dr7 6YAl v""NX /$)20

JU~.3- '1: l-ES-201

___ ~ ~_ _ _ _ __ E_xaminati()n _Security Agreement Form ES-201-3

1.

Pre-Examination I acknowledge that I have acquired specialized knowledge about the NRC licensing examinations scheduled for the week(s) of V II] 10'1 as of the date of my signature. I agree that I will not knowingly divulge any information about these examinations to any persons who have not been authorized by the NRC chief examiner. I understand that I am not to instruct, evaluate, or provide performance feedback to those applicants scheduled to be administered these licensing examinations from this date until completion of examination administration, except as specifically noted below and authorized by the NRC (e.g., acting as a simulator booth operator or communicator is acceptable if the individual does not select the training content or provide direct or indirect feedback). Furthermore, I am aware of the physical security measures and requirements (as documented in the facility licensee's procedures) and understand that violation of the conditions of this agreement may result in cancellation of the examinations and/or an enforcement action against me or the facility licensee. I will immediately report to facility management or the NRC chief examiner any indications or suggestions that examination security may have been compromised.

2.

Post-Examination I did not divulge to any unauthorized persons any information concerning the NRC licensing examinations administered during the week(s) of 4'~ From the date that I entered into this security agreement until the completion of examination administration, I did not instruct, evaluate, or provide pe ormance feedback to those applicants who were administered these licensing examinations, except as specifically noted below and authorized by the NRC. PRINTED NAME JOB TITLE / RESPONSIBILITY DATE NOTE

1. J ~ V(A." HJ~

Mit] S'rlN / tZc 0 "~'!&_

r I

2.

JC<.j+

y\\~'~ .IV f[ on y ","\\I "'-. ';'1 T~~~~ ql?~

3.

N~\\" C<P'v<)

4. 11m ~~4~rJ RcO II:

5. ~6....-l~1NPf I.@

s./VPO

01.

~o ~~~v '£~ !~~,~ St2-c:. I..!:a~

9.

I<:..tt~1::> R'ST&e2.S.6~ t*S S\\,-D Cc".\\.,J,,,k 7-1"("-0'1

10. Leo.;ardQ.s. (?odW.({2

,s",PO . ilt70 A/~ffi 11.J.~ ~o !f1[jd- ~;: j -' C(C~tL -r~~~

'1 L-I ~

J!di

14. & S"'>"AW

1) 7 q.f'i*Oo;

15.

rf,cJ'" -r(2N £.KAM ILc..r l-t (Mr 011./' ~- NOTES: J>>~f -? 0IS&4~.~(yt-- 7N~ ;;(J~ Z(3) /9 l~o ES-201 Examination Security Agreement Form ES-201-3

1.

Pre-Examination I acknowledge that I have acquired specialized knowledge about the NRC licensing examinations scheduled for the week(s) of V II] 10'1 as of the date of my signature. I agree that I will not knowingly divulge any information about these examinations to any persons who have not been authorized by the NRC chief examiner. I understand that I am not to instruct, evaluate, or provide performance feedback to those applicants scheduled to be administered these licensing examinations from this date until completion of examination administration, except as specifically noted below and authorized by the NRC (e.g., acting as a simulator booth operator or communicator is acceptable if the individual does not select the training content or provide direct or indirect feedback). Furthermore, I am aware of the physical security measures and requirements (as documented in the facility licensee's procedures) and understand that violation of the conditions of this agreement may result in cancellation of the examinations and/or an enforcement action against me or the facility licensee. I will immediately report to facility management or the NRC chief examiner any indications or suggestions that examination security may have been compromised.

2.

Post-Examination I did not divulge to any unauthorized persons any information concerning the NRC licensing examinations administered during the week(s) of . From the date that I entered into this security agreement until the completion of examination administration, I did not instruct, evaluate, or provide pe ormance feedback to those applicants who were administered these licensing examinations, except as specifically noted below and authorized by the NRC. JOB TITLE / RESPONSIBILITY 111M 5\\AN /tZc 0

/~!d i:t ES-201 Examination Security Agreement Form ES-201-3

1.

Pre-Examination I acknowledge that I have acquired specialized knowledge about the NRC licensing examinations scheduled for the week(s) of ~ as of the date of my signature. I agree that I will not knowingly divulge any information about these examinations to any persons who have not been authorized by the NRC chief examiner. I understand that I am not to instruct, evaluate, or provide performance feedback to those applicants scheduled to be administered these licensing examinations from this date until completion of examination administration, except as specifically noted below and authorized by the NRC (e.g., acting as a simulator booth operator or communicator is acceptable if the individual does not select the training content or provide direct or indirect feedback). Furthermore, I am aware of the physical security measures and requirements (as documented in the facility licensee's procedures) and understand that violation of the conditions of this agreement may result in cancellation of the examinations and/or an enforcement action against me or the facility licensee. I will immediately report to facility management or the NRC chief examiner any indications or suggestions that examination security may have been compromised.

2.

Post-Examination To the best of my knowle ge, I did not divulge to any unauthorized persons any information concerning the NRC licensing examinations administered during the week(s) of . From the date that I entered into this security agreement until the completion of examination administration, I did not instruct, evaluate, or pr vi e p rformance feedback to those applicants who were administered these licensing examinations, except as specifically noted below and authorized by the NRC. JOB TITLE / RESPONSIBILITY SIGNATURE (1) DATE SIGNATURE (2) DATE NOTE Of~ {'-'Ife(J~T IC ~!/L -JflT(?PO'i

2. 1/- jZf:!..tL/I/I!

> nfl I . I '71'J)~. ~. ~.. ~?ti/7

3.

'i£.t? ?£.r~f/$IAY tlWl/lTstLjO I (? _~ ~ ,/'1.<)

4. C:", ~

\\'D 'L-nl l e < H : \\ ' (jW~ C

rrl __

5.

6.

PRINTED NAME

7.

S.

9.

10.

11.

12.

13. ________________________________________________________________________ __

14.

15.

NOTES: ES-201 Examination Security Agreement Form ES-201-3

1.

Pre-Examination I acknowledge that I have acquired specialized knowledge about the NRC licensing examinations scheduled for the week(s) of ~ as of the date of my signature. I agree that I will not knowingly divulge any information about these examinations to any persons who have not been authorized by the NRC chief examiner. I understand that I am not to instruct, evaluate, or provide performance feedback to those applicants scheduled to be administered these licensing examinations from this date until completion of examination administration, except as specifically noted below and authorized by the NRC (e.g., acting as a simulator booth operator or communicator is acceptable if the individual does not select the training content or provide direct or indirect feedback). Furthermore, I am aware of the physical security measures and requirements (as documented in the facility licensee's procedures) and understand that violation of the conditions of this agreement may result in cancellation of the examinations and/or an enforcement action against me or the facility licensee. I will immediately report to facility management or the NRC chief examiner any indications or suggestions that examination security may have been compromised.

2.

Post-Examination To the best of my knowle ge, I did not divulge to any unauthorized persons any information concerning the NRC licensing examinations administered during the week(s) of . From the date that I entered into this security agreement until the completion of examination administration, I did not instruct, evaluate, or pr vi e p rformance feedback to those applicants who were administered these licensing examinations, except as specifically noted below and authorized by the NRC. JOB TITLE / RESPONSIBILITY SIGNATURE (1) DATE SIGNATURE (2) DATE NOTE Of~ {'-'I fe(J~T IC /Y 1ft - JiLT (?Po'!

2.

> tl....P I

I---'~~,__. I '71'J)~

.. ~. ~.. ~?ti/7

3. --=:=----!.~:..::-,..,....;:.:.....:.:..-..:;.. _

~...:c...-_I.c..T.--=s_tt...:...<-jO ________ ~"1f;?;-~~4~~~__ I (? _~~ ,/'1.<) __

4.

"L-nl (,d) (H:\\ _---t.~~';&;~~~======-- (j~ c {I'/ __

5.

6. _________________________________________________________ _

PRINTED NAME

7. _____________________________________________________ _

8. ___________________________________________________________ _

9. _________________________________________________________________ _

10. __________________________________________________________ _

11.. ________________________________________________________________ _ 12.. ________________________________________________________ _

13. ______________________________________________________________ _

14. _________________________________________________________________ _

15. ___________________________________________________________ _

NOTES:

ES-301 Administrative Tories Outline Form ES-301-1 Facility: Turkey Point Units 3 & 4 Date of Examination: August/September 2009 Exam Level: RO Operating Test Number: 2009-301-2 Administrative Topic Type Code Describe Activity to be performed (See Note) (See Note) Perform a Dilution calculation for a Unit Power change from A.I CR,N 60-100% (2.1.37 Knowledge of procedures, guidelines, or Conduct of Operations limitations associated with reactivity management. (CFR: 41.1 ! 43.6! 45.6) IMPORTANCE RO 4.3 SRO 4.6 A.2 Perform 3-0SP-059.1 0, Perform A QPTR Calculation. (2.2.12 Equipment Control CR,D Knowledge of surveillance procedures. (CFR: 41.10! 45.13) IMPORTANCE RO 3.7 SRO 4.1 Determine Allowable Stay Time & Determine Radiological Requirements for HCY-4-758 Surveillance. (2.3.7 Ability to A.3 CR,N comply with radiation work permit requirements during normal Radiation Control or abnormal conditions. (CFR: 41.12 ! 45.10) IMPORTANCE RO 3.5 SRO 3.6) Identity the correct CSF Priority based on Unit conditions. A.4-RO (2.4.22 Knowledge of the bases for prioritizing safety functions Emergency Plan CR,N during abnormaUemergency operations. (CFR: 41.7 ! 41. IO! 43.5 ! 45.12) IMPORTANCE RO 3.6 SRO 4.4) NOTE: All items (5 total) are required for SROs. RO applicants require only 4 items unless they are retaking only the administrative topics, when 5 are required.

Types and Codes (C) Control Room (S) Simulator (CR) Classroom (D)irect from bank ( :S3 for ROs, :s4 for SROs)

I (N)ew or (M)odified from bank (2: I) (P)revious 2 Exams (:Sl Randomly selected) .... ~--~ ES-301 Administrative Topics Outline Form ES-301-1 Facility: Turkey Point Units 3 & 4 Date of Examination: August/September 2009 Exam Level: RO Operating Test Number: 2009-301-2 Administrative Topic Type Code Describe Activity to be performed (See Note) (See Note) Perform a Dilution calculation for a Unit Power change from A.I CR,N 60-100% (2.1.37 Knowledge of procedures, guidelines, or Conduct of Operations limitations associated with reactivity management. (CFR: 41.1 ! 43.6! 45.6) IMPORTANCE RO 4.3 SRO 4.6 A.2 Perform 3-0SP-059.1 0, Perform A QPTR Calculation. (2.2.12 Equipment Control CR,D Knowledge of surveillance procedures. (CFR: 41.10! 45.13) IMPORTANCE RO 3.7 SRO 4.1 Determine Allowable Stay Time & Determine Radiological Requirements for HCY-4-758 Surveillance. (2.3.7 Ability to A.3 CR,N comply with radiation work permit requirements during normal Radiation Control or abnormal conditions. (CFR: 41.12 ! 45.10) IMPORTANCE RO 3.5 SRO 3.6) Identity the correct CSF Priority based on Unit conditions. A.4-RO (2.4.22 Knowledge of the bases for prioritizing safety functions Emergency Plan CR,N during abnormaUemergency operations. (CFR: 41.7 ! 41. IO! 43.5 ! 45.12) IMPORTANCE RO 3.6 SRO 4.4) NOTE: All items (5 total) are required for SROs. RO applicants require only 4 items unless they are retaking only the administrative topics, when 5 are required.

Types and Codes (C) Control Room (S) Simulator (CR) Classroom (D)irect from bank ( :S3 for ROs, :s4 for SROs)

(N)ew or (M)odified from bank (2: I) (P)revious 2 Exams (:Sl Randomly selected)

ES-301 Administrative Tories Outline Form ES-301-1 Facility: Turkey Point Units 3 & 4 Date of Examination: August/September 2009 Exam Level: SRO (U) & (I) Operating Test Number: 2009-301-2 Administrative Topic Type Code Describe Activity to be performed (See Note) (See Note) Verity a Dilution calculation for a Unit Power change from 60-SA. 1.1 CR, N 100% (2. I.37 Knowledge of procedures, guidelines, or Conduct of Operations limitations associated with reactivity management. (CFR: 4 I. I / 43.6/ 4S.6) IMPORTANCE RO 4.3 SRO 4.6 Perform Review of 0-OSP-20S, Verification of Administratively SA.I.2 Controlled Valves, Locks, and Switches and Determine Conduct of Operations CR,N Corrective Actions (2. 1.29 Knowledge of how to conduct system lineups, such as valves, breakers, switches, etc. (CFR: 41.10/ 4S.1 / 4S.12) IMPORTANCE RO 4.1 SRO 4.0 Perform 3-0SP-OS9.1 0, Perform A QPTR Calculation and A.2 CR,D Determine Corrective Actions. (2.2.12 Knowledge of Equipment Control surveillance procedures. (CFR: 41.10/ 4S.13) IMPORTANCE RO 3.7 SRO 4.1 Determine Allowable Stay Time & Determine Radiological A.3 Requirements for HCV-4-7S8 Surveillance. (2.3.7 Ability to Radiation Control CR,N comply with radiation work permit requirements during normal or abnormal conditions. (CFR: 4 1.12/ 4S.1 0) IMPORTANCE RO 3.S SRO 3.6) Classity Plant Event recommend PARS and complete SNF. SA.4 - SRO CR,M 2.4.41 Knowledge of the emergency action level thresholds and Emergency Plan classifications. (CFR: 41.10 / 43.S / 4S.1 I) IMPORTANCE RO 2.9 SRO 4.6 NOTE: All items (S total) are required for SROs. RO applicants require only 4 items unless they are retaking only the administrative topics, when S are required.

Types and Codes (C) Control Room (S) Simulator (CR) Classroom (D)irect from bank (::;3 for ROs, :s4 for SROs)

(N)ew or (M)od ified from bank (~1) (P)revious 2 Exams (::;1 Randomly selected) ES-301 Administrative Topics Outline Form ES-301-1 Facility: Turkey Point Units 3 & 4 Date of Examination: August/September 2009 Exam Level: SRO (U) & (I) Operating Test Number: 2009-301-2 Administrative Topic Type Code Describe Activity to be performed (See Note) (See Note) Verity a Dilution calculation for a Unit Power change from 60-SA. 1.1 CR, N 100% (2. I.37 Knowledge of procedures, guidelines, or Conduct of Operations limitations associated with reactivity management. (CFR: 4 I. I / 43.6/ 4S.6) IMPORTANCE RO 4.3 SRO 4.6 Perform Review of 0-OSP-20S, Verification of Administratively SA.I.2 Controlled Valves, Locks, and Switches and Determine Conduct of Operations CR,N Corrective Actions (2. 1.29 Knowledge of how to conduct system lineups, such as valves, breakers, switches, etc. (CFR: 41.10/ 4S.1 / 4S.12) IMPORTANCE RO 4.1 SRO 4.0 Perform 3-0SP-OS9.1 0, Perform A QPTR Calculation and A.2 CR,D Determine Corrective Actions. (2.2.12 Knowledge of Equipment Control surveillance procedures. (CFR: 41.10/ 4S.13) IMPORTANCE RO 3.7 SRO 4.1 Determine Allowable Stay Time & Determine Radiological A.3 Requirements for HCV-4-7S8 Surveillance. (2.3.7 Ability to Radiation Control CR,N comply with radiation work permit requirements during normal or abnormal conditions. (CFR: 4 1.12/ 4S.1 0) IMPORTANCE RO 3.S SRO 3.6) Classity Plant Event recommend PARS and complete SNF. SA.4 - SRO CR,M 2.4.41 Knowledge of the emergency action level thresholds and Emergency Plan classifications. (CFR: 41.10 / 43.S / 4S.1 I) IMPORTANCE RO 2.9 SRO 4.6 NOTE: All items (S total) are required for SROs. RO applicants require only 4 items unless they are retaking only the administrative topics, when S are required.

Types and Codes (C) Control Room (S) Simulator (CR) Classroom (D)irect from bank (::;3 for ROs, :s4 for SROs)

(N)ew or (M)od ified from bank (~1) (P)revious 2 Exams (::;1 Randomly selected)

ES-301 Control Roomlln-Plant Sx,stems Outline Form ES-301-2 Facility: Turke~ Point Date of Examination: Aug/Sep 2009 Exam Level (circle one): RO Operating Test No.: 2009-301-2 Control Room Systems@ (8 for RO; 7 for SRO-I; 2 or 3 for SRO-U) System / JPM Title Type Code* Safety Function a 001.1 Dropped rod recovery A,N,S 1 b 011 / Pressurizer Level Transmitter Drifts Low N,S 2 c 005 / Align Safety Injection for Hot Leg Recirculation A, D, L, S 4(P) d 015/ Source Range Nuclear Instrument N-32 Test (4/2007 NRC Exam) D,L,S,P 7 e 007 / Purging the PRT to Reduce Oxygen or Hydrogen M,S 5 I f 029 / Initiate Containment Purge D,L,M,S 8 I g 006 / Fill Accumulator N,S 3 h 064/ Perform EDG Normal Start Test A,M,S 6 In-Plant Systems@ (3 for RO; 3 for SRO-I; 3 or 2 for SRO-U) i 028 / Post Accident Hydrogen Monitoring/Place U-4 Post Accident A,D,R,E 5 Hydrogen Monitor in service as an NSO in the Auxiliary Building j 061 / Manual "An Auxiliary Feedwater Pump Start N 4(S) k 062/ AC Electrical Distribution/Swap from 4B Normal (4Y02) to B SPARE N 6 (4Y04) Inverter as an NSO All control room (and in-plant) systems must be different and serve different safety functions; I in-plant systems and functions may overlap those tested in the control room. I

Type Codes Criteria for RO / SRO-I / SRO-U I (A) It ern ate path 4-6/4-6/2-3 I (C)ontrol room (D)irect from bank s9/s8/s4 I (E)mergency or abnormal in-plant

1/;

:1/;::1 I (L)ow-Power

1/;::1/;::1 (N)ew or (M)odified from bank including 1 (A)

2/;::2/;::1 I (P)revious 2 exams s 3 / s 3 / s 2 (randomly selected)

(R)CA

1/;

:1/;::1 (S)imulator ES-301 Control Roomlln-Plant Systems Outline Form ES-301-2 Facility:

Turke~ Point Date of Examination: Aug/Sep 2009 Exam Level (circle one): RO Operating Test No.: 2009-301-2 Control Room Systems@ (8 for RO; 7 for SRO-I; 2 or 3 for SRO-U) System / JPM Title Type Code* Safety Function a 001.1 Dropped rod recovery A,N,S 1 b 011 / Pressurizer Level Transmitter Drifts Low N,S 2 c 005 / Align Safety Injection for Hot Leg Recirculation A, D, L, S 4(P) d 015/ Source Range Nuclear Instrument N-32 Test (4/2007 NRC Exam) D,L,S,P 7 e 007 / Purging the PRT to Reduce Oxygen or Hydrogen M,S 5 f 029 / Initiate Containment Purge D,L,M,S 8 g 006 / Fill Accumulator N,S 3 h 064/ Perform EDG Normal Start Test A,M,S 6 In-Plant Systems@ (3 for RO; 3 for SRO-I; 3 or 2 for SRO-U) i 028 / Post Accident Hydrogen Monitoring/Place U-4 Post Accident A,D,R,E 5 Hydrogen Monitor in service as an NSO in the Auxiliary Building j 061 / Manual "An Auxiliary Feedwater Pump Start N 4(S) k 062 / AC Electrical Distribution/Swap from 4B Normal (4Y02) to B SPARE N 6 (4Y04) Inverter as an NSO All control room (and in-plant) systems must be different and serve different safety functions; in-plant systems and functions may overlap those tested in the control room.

Type Codes Criteria for RO / SRO-I / SRO-U (A) It ern ate path 4-6/4-6/2-3 (C)ontrol room (D)irect from bank s9/s8/s4 (E)mergency or abnormal in-plant

1/;

:1/;::1 (L)ow-Power

1/;::1/;::1 (N)ew or (M)odified from bank including 1 (A)

2/;::2/;::1 (P)revious 2 exams s 3 / s 3 / s 2 (randomly selected)

(R)CA

1/;

:1/;::1 (S)imulator

ES-301 Control Room/In-Plant Sx,stems Outline Form ES-301-2 Facility: Turke~ Point Date of Examination: Aug/Sel2 2009 Exam Level (circle one): SRO-I Operating Test No.: 2009-301-2 Control Room Systems@ (8 for RO; 7 for SRO-I; 2 or 3 for SRO-U) I System / JPM Title Type Code* Safety I Function I a 001.1 Dropped rod recovery A,N,S 1 i b 011 / Pressurizer Level Transmitter Drifts Low N,S 2 c 005 / Align Safety Injection for Hot Leg Recirculation A,D,L,S 4(P) d 015/ Source Range Nuclear Instrument N-32 Test (4/2007 NRC Exam) D,L,S,P 7 e f 029 / Initiate Containment Purge L,M,S 8 g 006 / Fill Accumulator N,S 3 h 064/ Perform EDG Normal Start Test A,M,S 6 In-Plant Systems@ (3 for RO; 3 for SRO-I; 3 or 2 for SRO-U) i 028 / Post Accident Hydrogen Monitoring/Place U-4 Post Accident A,D,R,E 5 Hydrogen Monitor in service as an NSO in the Auxiliary Building j 061 / Manual "A" Auxiliary Feedwater Pump Start N 4(S) k 062/ AC Electrical Distribution/Swap from 4B Normal (4Y02) to B SPARE N 6 (4Y04) Inverter as an NSO All control room (and in-plant) systems must be different and serve different safety functions; in-plant systems and functions may overlap those tested in the control room.

Type Codes Criteria for RO / SRO-I / SRO-U (A)lternate path 4-6/4-6 / 2-3 (C)ontrol room (D)irect from bank

'509/'508/'504 (E)mergency or abnormal in-plant 2:1/2:1/2:1 (L)ow-Power 2:1/2:1/2:1 (N)ew or (M)odified from bank including 1 (A) 2:2/2:2/2:1 (P)revious 2 exams '50 3 / '50 3 / '50 2 (randomly selected) (R)CA 2:1/2:1/2:1 (S)imulator I ES-301 Control Room/In-Plant Systems Outline Form ES-301-2 Facility: Turke~ Point Date of Examination: Aug/Sel2 2009 Exam Level (circle one): SRO-I Operating Test No.: 2009-301-2 Control Room Systems@ (8 for RO; 7 for SRO-I; 2 or 3 for SRO-U) System / JPM Title Type Code* Safety Function a 001.1 Dropped rod recovery A,N,S 1 b 011 / Pressurizer Level Transmitter Drifts Low N,S 2 c 005 / Align Safety Injection for Hot Leg Recirculation A,D,L,S 4(P) d 015/ Source Range Nuclear Instrument N-32 Test (4/2007 NRC Exam) D,L,S,P 7 e f 029 / Initiate Containment Purge L,M,S 8 g 006 / Fill Accumulator N,S 3 h 064/ Perform EDG Normal Start Test A,M,S 6 In-Plant Systems@ (3 for RO; 3 for SRO-I; 3 or 2 for SRO-U) i 028 / Post Accident Hydrogen Monitoring/Place U-4 Post Accident A,D,R,E 5 Hydrogen Monitor in service as an NSO in the Auxiliary Building j 061 / Manual "A" Auxiliary Feedwater Pump Start N 4(S) k 062 / AC Electrical Distribution/Swap from 4B Normal (4Y02) to B SPARE N 6 (4Y04) Inverter as an NSO All control room (and in-plant) systems must be different and serve different safety functions; in-plant systems and functions may overlap those tested in the control room.

Type Codes Criteria for RO / SRO-I / SRO-U (A)lternate path 4-6/4-6 / 2-3 (C)ontrol room (D)irect from bank

'509/'508/'504 (E)mergency or abnormal in-plant 2:1/2:1/2:1 (L)ow-Power 2:1/2:1/2:1 (N)ew or (M)odified from bank including 1 (A) 2:2/2:2/2:1 (P)revious 2 exams '50 3 / '50 3 / '50 2 (randomly selected) (R)CA 2:1/2:1/2:1 (S)imulator

ES-301 Operating Test Quality Checklist Form ES-301-3 F 4 ~"..... Facilty: Turkey-Point 3&4 Date of Exam:8/17/09 Scenario Numbers: 1-7 Operating Test No.: 2009-301-2 Initials

1. General Criteria a

b* C#

a.

The operating test conforms with the previously approved outline; changes are consistent with f f I~i sampling requirements (e.g., 10 CFR 55.45, operational importance, safety function distribution).

b.

There is no day-to-day repetition between this and other operating tests to be administered ~ (J -t!1 during this examination.

c.

The operating test shall not duplicate items from the applicants' audit test(s). (see Section D.1.a.) V -.f 11..

d.

Overlap with the written examination and between different parts of the operating test is within 5" ~ ~;i acceptable limits.

e.

It appears that the operating test will differentiate between competent and less-than-competent & -P ~:t applicants at the designated license level.

2. Walk-Through Criteria

a.

Each JPM includes the following, as applicable: initial conditions fJ./ f initiating cues references and tools, including associated procedures -di reasonable and validated time limits (average time allowed for completion) and specific deSignation if deemed to be time-critical by the facility licensee operationally important specific performance criteria that include: detailed expected actions with exact criteria and nomenclature system response and other examiner cues statements describing important observations to be made by the applicant criteria for successful completion of the task identification of critical steps and their associated performance standards restrictions on the sequence of steps, if applicable

b.

Ensure that any changes from the previously approved systems and administrative walk-through ~ ~ outlines (Forms ES-301-1 and 2) have not caused the test to deviate from any of the acceptance -dJ criteria (e.g., item distribution, bank use, repetition from the last 2 NRC examinations) specified on those forms and Form ES-201-2.

3. Simulator Criteria The associated simulator operating tests (scenario sets) have been reviewed in accordance with

~ 1-1 IP Form ES-301-4 and a copy is attached. e4- ~A",.4~ ".-ft-/e""t" N,m, I Si9",~f"::~{' y,pi,J D.t,

a.

A"thoe OWeJJ /3 T/l..to~. 11214> ./ ~ Facility Reviewer(*) ~A~~""> K. Cu"'C'(Jk (........ L~.-/"-- ~ CO"

b.

c.

NRC Chief Examiner (#) Edw/;? LL~il §c/L~ k L I (h 8//;L.2~~1 / / "A/HI, L I

d.

NRC Supervisor ~;;'w'!!AlU.MJAJ/ rJA, '1IILM1v,,---- ~/(3&2~ / ( '1 '---'/ NOTE: The facility signature is not applicable for NRC-developed tests. Independent NRC reviewer initial items in Column "c n

chief examiner concurrence required.

ES-301 Operating Test Quality Checklist Form ES-301-3 F J () a.1 Facilty: Turkey-Point 3&4 Date of Exam:8/17/09 Scenario Numbers: 1-7 Operating Test No.: 2009-301-2 Initials

1. General Criteria a

b* C#

a.

The operating test conforms with the previously approved outline; changes are consistent with f f I~i sampling requirements (e.g., 10 CFR 55.45, operational importance, safety function distribution).

b.

There is no day-to-day repetition between this and other operating tests to be administered ~ (J LL1 during this examination.

c.

The operating test shall not duplicate items from the applicants' audit test(s). (see Section D.1.a.) V -.f 11..

d.

Overlap with the written examination and between different parts of the operating test is within 5" ~ ~;i acceptable limits.

e.

It appears that the operating test will differentiate between competent and less-than-competent & -P ~:t applicants at the designated license level.

2. Walk-Through Criteria

a.

Each JPM includes the following, as applicable: initial conditions W f initiating cues references and tools, including associated procedures -di reasonable and validated time limits (average time allowed for completion) and specific deSignation if deemed to be time-critical by the facility licensee operationally important specific performance criteria that include: detailed expected actions with exact criteria and nomenclature system response and other examiner cues statements describing important observations to be made by the applicant criteria for successful completion of the task identification of critical steps and their associated performance standards restrictions on the sequence of steps, if applicable

b.

Ensure that any changes from the previously approved systems and administrative walk-through ~ ~ outlines (Forms ES-301-1 and 2) have not caused the test to deviate from any of the acceptance -dJ criteria (e.g., item distribution, bank use, repetition from the last 2 NRC examinations) specified on those forms and Form ES-201-2.

3. Simulator Criteria The associated simulator operating tests (scenario sets) have been reviewed in accordance with

~ -j [p r--- Form ES-301-4 and a copy is attached. <?"" NA'A.4"--}?-/e';"ed N,m, I S;g",~ p~lDate

a.

Author OWt,)J f!> nlOt.o / /J;J4J / ~Z%C; ~A~~""> K. Cu"'C'(Jk (- ~

b.

Facility Reviewer(*) L /-

c.

NRC Chief Examiner (#) Edu>/F7 LLLil §,,-JLd-k L I (h 8//.y.-2~~1 / ~'nuJ L I

d.

NRC Supervisor ~;;\\V'!!Alf.,(MJAJ// '1IIL"Mlv,,---- ~/(3&2~ / ( '1 '---'/ NOTE: The facility signature is not applicable for NRC-developed tests. Independent NRC reviewer initial items in Column "c n

chief examiner concurrence required.

ES*301 Simulator Scenario Quality Checklist Form ES*301*4 Facilty: Turkey Point 3&4 Date of Exam:8/17/09 Scenario Numbers: 1 /2 /3 Operating Test No.: 2009-301-2 QUALITATIVE ATIRIBUTES Initials I a b*~ C#

1.

The initial conditions are realistic. in that some equipment and/or instrumentation may be out r ~ £i of service. but it does not cue the operators into expected events.

2.

The scenarios consist mostly of related events. I -.:t"' Li

3.

Each event description consists of 1 the pOint in the scenario when it is to be initiated the malfunction(s) that are entered to initiate the event the symptoms/cues that will be visible to the crew I~ the expected operator actions (by shift position) 5' the event termination point (if applicablel ~j

4.

No more than one non-mechanistic failure (e.g.* pipe break) is incorporated into the scenario tf -:e 1.1 without a credible preceding incident such as a seismic event.

5.

The events are valid with regard to physics and thermodynamics. () I"'-P.-I;.J

6.

Sequencing and timing of events is reasonable. and allows the examination team to obtain

- ~ Lei complete evaluation results commensurate with the scenario objectives.: 7.

If time compression techniques are used. the scenario summary clearly so indicates. ~ Operators have sufficient time to carry out expected activities without undue time constraints. f ~j Cues are given.

8.

The simulator modeling is not altered. 0 .-f" L r1.

9.

The scenarios have been validated. Pursuant to 10 CFR 55.46(d). any open simulator -2 performance deficiencies or deviations from the referenced plant have been evaluated 6 LlJ to ensure that functional fidelity is maintained while running the planned scenarios.

10.

Every operator will be evaluated using at least one new or significantly modified scenario. { fJ Lti-All other scenarios have been altered in accordance with Section 0.5 of ES-301. !-I -=

11.

All individual operator competencies can be evaluated. as verified using Form ES-301-6 r: (/ L.f-(submit the form alonq with the simulator scenarios). I.,.

12.

Each applicant will be significantly involved in the minimum number of transients and events rr ~ l.t:t specified on Form ES-301-5 isubmit the form with the simulator scenarios). ""j

13.

The level of difficulty is appropriate to support licensing decisions for each crew position. tf --f/ ~.:;L Ta,.get Quantitative Attributes (Per Scenario; See Section D.S.d) Actual Attributes

1.

Total malfunctions (5-8) 517 17 I --t: ~::!

2.

Malfunctions after EOP entry (1-2) 2/1/2 rL q L:f

3.

Abnormal events (2-4) 2/4/3 6 ~ tJ'

4.

Major transients (1-2) 1 /2/ 1 0'...w.. A..:t

5.

EOPs entered/requiring sUbstantive actions (1-2) 3/2/1 6 --r: '7-

6.

EOP contingencies requiring substantive actions (0-2) 0/1/0 f -t/7 IAfJ

7.

Critical tasks (2-3) 2/2/3 0 ...r-- A:t ES*301 Simulator Scenario Quality Checklist Form ES*301*4 Facilty: Turkey Point 3&4 Date of Exam:8/17/09 Scenario Numbers: 1 /2 /3 Operating Test No.: 2009-301-2 QUALITATIVE ATIRIBUTES Initials a b*.......... C#

1.

The initial conditions are realistic. in that some equipment and/or instrumentation may be out r ~ £;1 of service. but it does not cue the operators into expected events.

2.

The scenarios consist mostly of related events. I -.:t"'..li

3.

Each event description consists of 1 the pOint in the scenario when it is to be initiated the malfunction(s) that are entered to initiate the event the symptoms/cues that will be visible to the crew I~ the expected operator actions (by shift position) 5' the event termination point (if applicablel ~j

4.

No more than one non-mechanistic failure (e.g.* pipe break) is incorporated into the scenario 0- J 1.1 without a credible preceding incident such as a seismic event.

5.

The events are valid with regard to physics and thermodynamics. () I~..I:.J

6.

Sequencing and timing of events is reasonable. and allows the examination team to obtain I~ Lei complete evaluation results commensurate with the scenario objectives.

7.

If time compression techniques are used. the scenario summary clearly so indicates. ~ Operators have sufficient time to carry out expected activities without undue time constraints. f ~j Cues are given.

8.

The simulator modeling is not altered. 0 .-f" L r1.

9.

The scenarios have been validated. Pursuant to 10 CFR 55.46(d). any open simulator -2 performance deficiencies or deviations from the referenced plant have been evaluated 6 L-lJ to ensure that functional fidelity is maintained while running the planned scenarios.

10.

Every operator will be evaluated using at least one new or significantly modified scenario. ( [) ~;t. All other scenarios have been altered in accordance with Section 0.5 of ES-301. -i..--....

11.

All individual operator competencies can be evaluated. as verified using Form ES-301-6 r: '/ 'L.f-(submit the form alonq with the simulator scenariosl -I

12.

Each applicant will be significantly involved in the minimum number of transients and events rr £ ~:t specified on Form ES-301-5Jsubmit the form with the simulator scenarios).

13.

The level of difficulty is appropriate to support licensing decisions for each crew position. tf --I-'"' ~;}.. Target Quantitative Attributes (Per Scenario; See Section D.S.d) Actual Attributes

1.

Total malfunctions (5-8) 517 17 I -t: ~::!

2.

Malfunctions after EOP entry (1-2) 2/1/2 If q L:f

3.

Abnormal events (2-4) 2/4/3 6 ~ tJ'

4.

Major transients (1-2) 1 /2/ 1 0'...w.. A..:t

5.

EOPs entered/requiring sUbstantive actions (1-2) 3/2/1 6 -r.. '7-

6.

EOP contingencies requiring substantive actions (0-2) 0/1/0 f -t/7 -'J

7.

Critical tasks (2-3) 2/2/3 0 I~ 4:t

ES-301 Simulator Scenario Quality Checklist Form ES-301-4 Facilty: Turkey Point 3&4 Date of Exam:B/17/09 Scenario Numbers: 4/5/6 Operating Test No.: 2009-301-2 QUALITATIVE AITRIBUTES Initials a b*...--, C#

1.

The initial conditions are realistic, in that some equipment andlor instrumentation may be out ( It 1J of service, but it does not cue the operators into expected events.

2.

The scenarios consist mostly of related events. f 1-1'"' 121-

3.

Each event description consists of the point in the scenario when it is to be initiated the malfunction(s) that are entered to initiate the event the symptoms/cues that will be visible to the crew ..{J the expected operator actions (by shift position) f lei the event termination point (if applicable)

4.

No more than one non-mechanistic failure (e.g., pipe break) is incorporated into the scenario f l~ Iii without a credible preceding incident such as a seismic event.

5.

The events are valid with regard to physics and thermodynamics. / I--f" 1;"

6.

Sequencing and timing of events is reasonable, and allows the examination team to obtain f ~ Ii} complete evaluation results commensurate with the scenario objectives.

7.

If time compression techniques are used, the scenario summary clearly so indicates. ~ Operators have sufficient time to carry out expected activities without undue time constraints. ( l£1 Cues are~ven. B. The simulator modeling is not altered. /) ..f/ It J.

9.

The scenarios have been validated. Pursuant to 10 CFR 55.46(d), any open simulator fl performance deficiencies or deviations from the referenced plant have been evaluated f 1f to ensure that functional fidelity is maintained while runninq the planned scenarios.

10.

Every operator will be evaluated using at least one new or significantly modified scenario. (...u 1) All other scenarios have been altered in accordance with Section 0.5 of ES-301.

11.

All individual operator competencies can be evaluated, as verified using Form ES-301-6 ( ~ )) (submit the form along with the simulator scenarios).

12.

Each applicant will be significantly involved in the minimum number of transients and events 0- / },j specified on Form ES-301-5 (submit the form with the simulator scenarios).

13.

The level of difficulty is appropriate to support licensing decisions for each crew pOSition. lj -r ~.r Target Quantitative Attributes (Per Scenario; See Section D.S.d) Actual Attributes

1.

Total malfunctions (5--B) 71717 ~ -[/'0 J;}.

2.

Malfunctions after EOP entry (1-2) 1 12/2 0 -+! r.J..

3.

Abnormal events (2-4) 3/3/2 { -f/. ~Y

4.

Major transients (1-2) 1 11 11 i ~,,;..

5.

EOPs enteredlrequiring substantive actions (1-2) 2/1 11 ? -r: J.

6.

EOP contingencies requiring substantive actions (0-2) 1 10/1 () -, L.f _7. _ Critical tClsks (2-3) 2/2/2 , I.....,.. ,{ft"' ES-301 Simulator Scenario Quality Checklist Form ES-301-4 Facilty: Turkey Point 3&4 Date of Exam:S/17/09 Scenario Numbers: 4/5/6 Operating Test No.: 2009-301-2 QUALITATIVE AITRIBUTES Initials a b*..--, C#

1.

The initial conditions are realistic, in that some equipment andlor instrumentation may be out { +: 1J of service, but it does not cue the operators into expected events.

2.

The scenarios consist mostl}' of related events. b -r.I.f...

3.

Each event description consists of the point in the scenario when it is to be initiated the malfunction(s) that are entered to initiate the event the symptoms/cues that will be visible to the crew ..{J the expected operator actions (by shift position) f lei the event termination point (if applicable)

4.

No more than one non-mechanistic failure (e.g., pipe break) is incorporated into the scenario f I+:: Ili without a credible preceding incident such as a seismic event.

5.

The events are valid with regard to physics and thermodynamics. I l-r }:)..,

6.

Sequencing and timing of events is reasonable, and allows the examination team to obtain f h£7 Il} complete evaluation results commensurate with the scenario objectives.

7.

If time compression techniques are used, the scenario summary clearly so indicates. ~ Operators have sufficient time to carry out expected activities without undue time constraints. ( I-LI Cues are given. S. The simulator modeling is not altered. b ..f/ It J.

9.

The scenarios have been validated. Pursuant to 10 CFR 55.46(d), any open simulator fl performance deficiencies or deviations from the referenced plant have been evaluated f Ili to ensure that functional fidelity is maintained while running the planned scenarios.

10.

Every operator will be evaluated using at least one new or significantly modified scenario. { I..LJ IjJ All other scenarios have been altered in accordance with Section 0.5 of ES-301.

11.

All individual operator competencies can be evaluated, as verified using Form ES-301-6 ( I~ I)) (submit the form along with the simulator scenarios).

12.

Each applicant will be significantly involved in the minimum number of transients and events speCified on Form ES-301-5 (submit the form with the simulator scenarios). 0-1-1-/ 1j

13.

The level of difficul~is a()propriate to support licensing decisions for each crew position. ~,7 ~t Target Quantitative Attributes (Per Scenario; See Section D.5.dl Actual Attributes

1.

Total malfunctions (5--S) 71717 II -r J.

2.

Malfunctions after EOP entry (1-2) 1 12/2 (f -.f.::' J.

3.

Abnormal events (2-4) 3/3/2 -L Y,y

4.

Major transients (1-2) 1 11 11 i e>f':

5.

EOPs enteredlrequiring substantive actions (1-2) 2/1 11 I- -r f-

6.

EOP contingencies requiring substantive actions (0-2) 1 10/1 ~ J 2f

7.

Critical tasks (2-3) 2/2/2 ,..:..r 4t'"

ES-301 Transient and Event Checklist Form ES-301-5 Facility: Turkey Point 3 & 4 Date of Exam: 8/17/09 Operating Test No.: A E Scenarios P V 1 2 3 T M P E CREW CREW CREW CREW 0 I L N T N I T POSITION POSITION POSITION POSITION A I C S A B S A B S A B S A B M L U A T R T 0 R T 0 R T 0 R T 0 M(*) 0 C P 0 C P 0 C P 0 C P N Y R I U T P E RO RX 3 2 4 3 1 1 0 D NOR 1 1 2 1 1 1 SRO-I 6 4 2 D IIC 2,4 4 2,3,5 4 SRO-U MAJ 5 6 7 3 2 2 1 ~ TS 2,3,5 3 0 2 2 RO RX 3 2 4 3 1 1 0 D NOR 1 1 1 3 1 1 1 SRO-I IIC 4a, 3,4 2,3 6 4 4 2 D 6 SRO-U MAJ 5 6 7 3 2 2 1 I gj TS 1,4 2 2 2 2 I RO RX 3 2 4 3 1 1 0 I D NOR 1 1 1 1 1 I SRO-I IIC 3 3a,5 5 4 2 D 2,4 4 SRO-U MAJ 5 6 7 3 2 2 1 I ~ TS 2,4 2 0 2 2 RO RX 1 1 0 D NOR 1 1 1 SRO-I IIC 4 4 2 0 SRO-U MAJ 2 2 1 D TS 0 2 2 Instructions: I

1.

Check the applicant level and enter the operating test number and Form ES-D-1 event numbers for each I event type; TS are not applicable for RO applicants. ROs must serve in both the "at-the-controls (ATC)" I and "balance-of-plant (BOP)" positions; Instant SROs must serve in both the SRO and the ATC positions, I including at least two instrument or component (I/C) malfunctions and one major transient, in the ATC position. If an Instant SRO additionally serves in the BOP position, one IIC malfunction can be credited toward the two IIC malfunctions required for the A TC position.

2.

Reactivity manipulations may be conducted under normal or controlled abnormal conditions (refer to Section D.5.d) but must be significant per Section C.2.a of Appendix D. (*) Reactivity and normal evolutions may be replaced with additional instrument or component malfunctions on a 1-for-1 basis.

3.

Whenever practical, both instrument and component malfunctions should be included; only those that require verifiable actions that provide insight to the applicant's competence count toward the minimum requirements~ecified for the applicant'~cens~~in the right-hand columns. ES-301 Transient and Event Checklist Form ES-301-5 Facility: Turkey Point 3 & 4 Date of Exam: 8/17/09 Operating Test No.: A E Scenarios P V 1 2 3 T M P E CREW CREW CREW CREW 0 I L N T N I T POSITION POSITION POSITION POSITION A I C S A B S A B S A B S A B M L U A T R T 0 R T 0 R T 0 R T 0 M(*) 0 C P 0 C P 0 C P 0 C P N Y R I U T P E RO RX 3 2 4 3 1 1 0 D NOR 1 1 2 1 1 1 SRO-I 6 4 2 D IIC 2,4 4 2,3,5 4 SRO-U MAJ 5 6 7 3 2 2 1 ~ TS 2,3,5 3 0 2 2 RO RX 3 2 4 3 1 1 0 D NOR 1 1 1 3 1 1 1 SRO-I IIC 4a, 3,4 2,3 6 4 4 2 D 6 SRO-U MAJ 5 6 7 3 2 2 1 gj TS 1,4 2 2 2 2 RO RX 3 2 4 3 1 1 0 D NOR 1 1 1 1 1 SRO-I IIC 3 3a,5 5 4 2 D 2,4 4 SRO-U MAJ 5 6 7 3 2 2 1 I~ TS 2,4 2 0 2 2 RO RX 1 1 0 D NOR 1 1 1 SRO-I IIC 4 4 2 0 SRO-U MAJ 2 2 1 D TS 0 2 2 Instructions:

1.

Check the applicant level and enter the operating test number and Form ES-D-1 event numbers for each event type; TS are not applicable for RO applicants. ROs must serve in both the "at-the-controls (ATC)" and "balance-of-plant (BOP)" positions; Instant SROs must serve in both the SRO and the ATC positions, including at least two instrument or component (I/C) malfunctions and one major transient, in the ATC position. If an Instant SRO additionally serves in the BOP position, one IIC malfunction can be credited toward the two IIC malfunctions required for the A TC position.

2.

Reactivity manipulations may be conducted under normal or controlled abnormal conditions (refer to Section D.5.d) but must be significant per Section C.2.a of Appendix D. (*) Reactivity and normal evolutions may be replaced with additional instrument or component malfunctions on a 1-for-1 basis.

3.

Whenever practical, both instrument and component malfunctions should be included; only those that require verifiable actions that provide insight to the applicant's competence count toward the minimum requirements specified for the applicant's license level in the right-hand columns.

ES-301 Come,etencies Checklist Form ES-301-6 Facility: Turkey Point 3 & 4 Date of Examination: 8/17/2009 Operating Test No.: APPLICANTS SRO-U SRO-U SRO-U Competencies I 1 R 2B 3S I nterpretlDiagnose 2,3 1,2 2,3 Events and Conditions 4,5 4,5 7 6 Comply With and 2,3 1,2 Use Procedures (1) 4,5 4,5 7 6 Operate Control 2,3 1,21 N/A. ,1,3/ N/A 11,2. , N/A 12,3 Boards (2) 4,5 4,5 4a, 3,4 5,6 7 6 Communicate I ALL ALL 1 ALL _ I ALL 1 ALL 1 ALL _ I ALL 1 ALL and Interact Demonstrate II N/A 1 N/A 1 j :~. 1 N/A I j :~ 1 N/A _ 11.2 1 N/A Supervisory Ability (3) 5,6 7 ~4 Comply With and N/A N/A 2,3, Use Tech. Sm:"r.~ (~\\ 5 Notes: (1) Includes Technical Specification compliance for an RO. (2) Optional for an SRO-U. (3) Only applicable to SROs. I Instructions: Check the applicants' license type and enter one or more event numbers that will allow the examiners to evaluate every applicable competency for every applicant. ES-301 Competencies Checklist Form ES-301 -6 Facility: Turkey POint 3 & 4 Date of EXamination: 8/1 7/2009 Operating Test No.: SRO-U SRO-U SRO-U Competencies InterpreUDiagnose Events and Conditions Comply W~h and 2,3 1,2 2,3 Use Procedures (1) 4,5 3,4 5,6 7 5,6 Operate Control NfA 2,3 Boards (2) 5,6 Communicate ALL ALL ALL ALL Demonstrate NfA N/A 1,2 NfA Supervisory Ability (3) 3,4 5,6 Comply With and NfA N/A 2,3, 1,4 Use Tech. S Notes. (1) Includes Technical Specification compliance for an RO. (2) Optional for an SRO-U. (3) Only applicable to SROs. Instructions: Check the applicants' license type and enter one or more event numbers that will allow the examiners to evaluate every applicable competency for every applicant.

ES-301 Transient and Event Checklist Form ES-301-5 I Facility: Turkey Point 3 & 4 Date of Exam: 8/17/09 Operating Test No.: I A E Scenarios P V 4 5 6 T M P E CREW CREW CREW CREW 0 I L N T N I T POSITION POSITION POSITION POSITION A I C S A B S A B S A B S A B M L U A T R T 0 R T 0 R T 0 R T 0 0 C P 0 C P 0 C P 0 C P M(*) N Y R I U T P E RO RX 4 5 4 3 1 1 0 D NOR 1 2 2 1 1 1 SRO-I IIC 2,3,5 D 2 1,5 8 4 4 2 6a SRO-U 6b ~ MAJ 6 6 7 3 2 2 1 TS 1,2,3 3 0 2 2 RO RX 4 5 4 3 1 1 0 D NOR 1 1 2 1 1 1 SRO-I D IIC 3 2,3,4 5a,6 6 4 4 2 SRO-U MAJ 6 6 7 3 2 2 1 ~ TS 3,4 2 0 2 2 RO RX 4 5 4 3 1 1 0 D NOR 1 2 2 1 1 1 SRO-I D IIC 2,5 3,4 1,5,6 7 4 4 2 SRO-U MAJ 6 6 7 3 2 2 1 I~- TS 3,5 2 0 2 2 Instructions:

1.

Check the applicant level and enter the operating test number and Form ES-D-1 event numbers for each event type; TS are not applicable for RO applicants. ROs must serve in both the "at-the-controls (ATC)" and "balance-of-plant (BOP)" positions; Instant SROs must serve in both the SRO and the ATC positions, including at least two instrument or component (IIC) malfunctions and one major transient, in the ATC position. If an Instant SRO additionally serves in the BOP position, one IIC malfunction can be credited toward the two IIC malfunctions required for the ATC position.

2.

Reactivity manipulations may be conducted under normal or controlled abnormal conditions (refer to Section D.5.d) but must be significant per Section C.2.a of Appendix D. (*) Reactivity and normal evolutions may be replaced with additional instrument or component malfunctions on a 1-for-1 basis.

3.

Whenever practical, both instrument and component malfunctions should be included; only those that require verifiable actions that provide insight to the applicant's competence count toward the minimum requirements specified for the applicant's license level in the right-hand columns. ES-301 Transient and Event Checklist Form ES-301-5 !aCility: Turkey Point 3 & 4 Date of Exam: 8/17/09 Operating Test No.: A E Scenarios P V 4 5 6 T M P E CREW CREW CREW CREW 0 I L N T N I T POSITION POSITION POSITION POSITION A I C S A B S A B S A B S A B M L U A T R T 0 R T 0 R T 0 R T 0 0 C P 0 C P 0 C P 0 C P M(*) N Y R I U T P E RO RX 4 5 4 3 1 1 0 D NOR 1 2 2 1 1 1 SRO-I IIC 2,3,5 D 2 1,5 8 4 4 2 6a SRO-U 6b ~ MAJ 6 6 7 3 2 2 1 TS 1,2,3 3 0 2 2 RO RX 4 5 4 3 1 1 0 D NOR 1 1 2 1 1 1 SRO-I D IIC 3 2,3,4 5a,6 6 4 4 2 SRO-U MAJ 6 6 7 3 2 2 1 ~ TS 3,4 2 0 2 2 RO RX 4 5 4 3 1 1 0 D NOR 1 2 2 1 1 1 SRO-I D IIC 2,5 3,4 1,5,6 7 4 4 2 SRO-U MAJ 6 6 7 3 2 2 1 ~ TS 3,5 2 0 2 2 Instructions:

1.

Check the applicant level and enter the operating test number and Form ES-D-1 event numbers for each event type; TS are not applicable for RO applicants. ROs must serve in both the "at-the-controls (ATC)" and "balance-of-plant (BOP)" positions; Instant SROs must serve in both the SRO and the ATC positions, including at least two instrument or component (IIC) malfunctions and one major transient, in the ATC position. If an Instant SRO additionally serves in the BOP position, one IIC malfunction can be credited toward the two IIC malfunctions required for the ATC position.

2.

Reactivity manipulations may be conducted under normal or controlled abnormal conditions (refer to Section D.5.d) but must be significant per Section C.2.a of Appendix D. (*) Reactivity and normal evolutions may be replaced with additional instrument or component malfunctions on a 1-for-1 basis.

3.

Whenever practical, both instrument and component malfunctions should be included; only those that require verifiable actions that provide insight to the applicant's competence count toward the minimum requirements specified for the applicant's license level in the right-hand columns.

ES-301 Transient and Event Checklist Form ES-301-5 Facility: Turkey Point 3 & 4 Date of Exam: 8/17/09 Operating Test No.: A E Scenarios P V 1 2 3 T M P E CREW CREW CREW CREW 0 I L N T N I T POSITION POSITION POSITION POSITION A I C S A B S A B S A B S A B M T 0 L U A T R T 0 R T 0 R T 0 R M(*) 0 C P 0 C P 0 C P 0 C P N Y R I U T P E RO RX 3 2 4 3 1 1 0 D NOR 1 1 2 1 1 1 SRO-I lZJ IIC 2,4 4 2,3,5 6 4 4 2 SRO-U MAJ 5 6 7 3 2 2 1 D TS 2,3,5 3 0 2 2 RO RX 3 2 4 3 1 1 0 D NOR 1 1 1 3 1 1 1 SRO-I IIC 4a, 3,4 2,3 6 4 4 2 ~ 6 SRO-U MAJ 5 6 7 3 2 2 1 D TS 1,4 2 2 2 2 RO RX 3 2 4 3 1 1 0 D NOR 1 1 1 1 1 SRO-I [&l IIC 2,4 3 3a,5 5 4 4 2 SRO-U MAJ 5 6 7 3 2 2 1 D TS 2,4 2 0 2 2 RO RX 1 1 0 0 NOR 1 1 1 SRO-I 0 IIC 4 4 2 SR()"U MAJ 2 2 1 D TS 0 2 2 Instructions:

1.

Check the applicant level and enter the operating test number and Form ES-D-1 event numbers for each event type; TS are not applicable for RO applicants. ROs must serve in both the "at-the-controls (ATC)" and "balance-of-plant (BOP)" positions; Instant SROs must serve in both the SRO and the ATC positions, including at least two instrument or component (IIC) malfunctions and one major transient, in the ATC position. If an Instant SRO additionally serves in the BOP position, one IIC malfunction can be credited toward the two IIC malfunctions required for the ATC position.

2.

Reactivity manipulations may be conducted under normal or controlled abnormal conditions (refer to Section D.5.d) but must be significant per Section C.2.a of Appendix D. (*) Reactivity and normal evolutions may be replaced with additional instrument or component malfunctions on a 1-for-1 basis.

3.

Whenever practical, both instrument and component malfunctions should be included; only those that require verifiable actions that provide insight to the applicant's competence count toward the minimum --.':equiremen~speci!ied.!0r.the applican~s I~en~e level in the right-hand columns. ES-301 Transient and Event Checklist Form ES-301-5 ty: Turkey Point 3 & 4 Date of Exam: 8/17/09 Operating Test No.: A E Scenarios P V 1 2 3 T M P E CREW CREW CREW CREW 0 I L N T N I T POSITION POSITION POSITION POSITION A I C S A B S A B S A B S A B M T 0 L U A T R T 0 R T 0 R T 0 R M(*) 0 C P 0 C P 0 C P 0 C P N Y R I U T P E RO RX 3 2 4 3 1 1 0 D NOR 1 1 2 1 1 1 SRO-I lZJ IIC 2,4 4 2,3,5 6 4 4 2 SRO-U MAJ 5 6 7 3 2 2 1 D TS 2,3,5 3 0 2 2 RO RX 3 2 4 3 1 1 0 D NOR 1 1 1 3 1 1 1 SRO-I IIC 4a, 3,4 2,3 6 4 4 2 ~ 6 SRO-U MAJ 5 6 7 3 2 2 1 D TS 1,4 2 2 2 2 RO RX 3 2 4 3 1 1 0 D NOR 1 1 1 1 1 SRO-I [&l IIC 2,4 3 3a,5 5 4 4 2 SRO-U MAJ 5 6 7 3 2 2 1 D TS 2,4 2 0 2 2 RO RX 1 1 0 0 NOR 1 1 1 SRO-I 0 IIC 4 4 2 SR()"U MAJ 2 2 1 D TS 0 2 2 Instructions:

1.

Check the applicant level and enter the operating test number and Form ES-D-1 event numbers for each event type; TS are not applicable for RO applicants. ROs must serve in both the "at-the-controls (ATC)" and "balance-of-plant (BOP)" positions; Instant SROs must serve in both the SRO and the ATC positions, including at least two instrument or component (IIC) malfunctions and one major transient, in the ATC position. If an Instant SRO additionally serves in the BOP position, one IIC malfunction can be credited toward the two IIC malfunctions required for the ATC position.

2.

Reactivity manipulations may be conducted under normal or controlled abnormal conditions (refer to Section D.5.d) but must be significant per Section C.2.a of Appendix D. (*) Reactivity and normal evolutions may be replaced with additional instrument or component malfunctions on a 1-for-1 basis.

3.

Whenever practical, both instrument and component malfunctions should be included; only those that require verifiable actions that provide insight to the applicant's competence count toward the minimum requirements specified for the applicant's license level in the right-hand columns.

ES-301 Comeetencies Checklist Form ES-301-6 Facility: Turkey Point 3 & 4 Date of Examination: 8/17/2009 Operating Test No.: APPLICANTS SRO-U SRO-U SRO-U Competencies I SCENARIO SCENARIO SCENARIO 4S 5B 6R 4R 5S 6B _1 4B 15R I nterpretlDiagnose 2,3 2,5 1,4 3,4 2,3 4,5 Events and Conditions 4,5 6a, 5,7 6,7 4,5 6,7 6b 6 Comply With and 1,2 2,5 1,2 1,3 1,2 14,5 Use Procedures (1) 3,4 6a, 4,5 4,6 3,4 6,7 5,6 6b 7 7 5,6 7 Operate Control N/A 2,5 1,2 1,3 NIA 4,5 2,3 1,3 Boards (2) 6a. 4,5 4,6 6,7 5,6 4,5 6b 7 7 6 Communicate II ALL I ALL ALL ALL ALL ALL ALL ALL and Interact Demonstrate 1.2 N/A N/A N/A 1,2 I N/A I N/A Supervisory Ability (3) 3,4 3,4 5,6 5,6 7 Comply With and I \\2, 1 NIA 1 NIA _ I NIA 1 3,4 I NIA Use Tech. Soecs. (3) Notes: (1) Includes Technical Specification compliance for an RO. (2) Optional for an SRO-U. (3) Only applicable to SROs. I Instructions: Check the applicants' license type and enter one or more event numbers that will allow the examiners to evaluate every applicable competency for every applicant. ES-301 Competencies Checklist I F.acillity: Tur1<ey Point 3 & 4 Date of Examination: 8/17/2009 Competencies InterpreVDiagnose Events and Conditions Comply With and Use Procedures (1) Operate Control Boards (2) Communicate Demonstrate Supervisory Abi l~y (3) Comply With and Use Tech. Noles: SRO-U 4 S 5 B N/A 1,2 NIA 3,4 5,6 7 1,2, 4 SRO-U (1) Includes Technical SpecificatIon compliance for an RO, (2) Optional for an SRO-U. (3) Only applicable 10 SROs. Instructions: Form ES-301 -6 Operating Test No.: SRO-U Check the applicants' license type and enter one or more event numbers that will allow the examiners to evaluate every applicable competency for every applicant.

ES-301 Come.etencies Checklist Form ES-301-6 Facility: Turkey Point 3 & 4 Date of Examination: 8/17/2009 Operating Test No.: Competencies I nterpretJDiagnose Events and Conditions Comply With and Use Procedures (1) Operate Control Boards (2) Communicate and Interact Demonstrate Supervisory Ability (3) Comply With and Use Tech. S Notes: SRO-I SCENARIO 1 R 2BI I 2,3 1,2 4,5 4,5 7 6 2,3 1,2 4,5 4,5 7 6 2,3 1,2 4,5 4,5 7 6 ALL ALL N/A N/A N/A 1 N/A APPLICANTS SRO-I SCENARIO 1 I I 2S (1) Includes Technical Specification compliance for an RO. (2) Optional for an SRO-U. (3) Only applicable to SROs. Instructions: SRO-I SCENARIO r-2R 38 2,3 3a, 5,6 4,5 6.7 2'm~ ' 5,6 4,5 7 2,*, 5,6 4,5 7 ALL ALL N1A N/A N/A 1 N/A Check the applicants' license type and enter one or more event numbers that will allow the examiners to evaluate every applicable competency for every applicant. ES-301 Competencies Checklist Form ES-301 -6 I Falcility: Turkey Point 3 & 4 Date of EXamination: 611712009 Operating Test No.: APPLICANTS SRO-I SRO-I SRO-I Competencies i and Comply With and 2,3 1,2 Use Procedures (1) 4,5 4,5 7 6 Operate Control Boards (2) Communicate ALL ALL Demonstrate NIA NIA Supervisory Ability (3) NIA NIA NOles: (1) Includes Technical Specification compliance for an RO. (2) Optional for an SRO-U. (3) Only applicable to SROs Instructions: Check the applicants' license type and enter one or more event numbers that will allow the examiners to evaluate every applicable competency for every applicant.

ES-301 Transient and Event Checklist Form ES-301-5 I Facility: Turkey Point 3 & 4 Date of Exam: 8/17/09 Operating Test No.: I A E Scenarios P V 4 5 6 T M P E CREW CREW CREW CREW 0 I L N T N I T POSITION POSITION POSITION POSITION A I C S A B S A B S A B S A B M L U A T R T 0 R T 0 R T 0 R T 0 M(*) 0 C P 0 C P 0 C P 0 C P N Y R I U T P E RO RX 4 5 4 3 1 1 0 0 NOR 1 2 2 1 1 1 SRO-I ~ I/C 2,3,5 2 1,5 8 4 4 2 6a SRO-U 6b 0 MAJ 6 6 7 3 2 2 1 TS 1,2,3 3 0 2 2 RO RX 4 5 4 3 1 1 0 0 NOR 1 1 2 1 1 1 SRO-I ~ IIC 3 2,3,4 5a,6 6 4 4 2 SRO-U MAJ 6 6 7 3 2 2 1 10 TS 3,4 2 0 2 2 IRO RX 4 5 4 3 1 1 0 10 NOR 1 2 2 1 1 1 I SRO-I

~O-U I/C 2,5 3,4 1,5,6 7

4 4 2 MAJ 6 6 7 3 2 2 1 0 TS 3,5 2 0 2 2 Instructions:

1.

Check the applicant level and enter the operating test number and Form ES-D-1 event numbers for each event type; TS are not applicable for RO applicants. ROs must serve in both the "at-the-controls (ATC)" and "balance-of-plant (BOP)" positions; Instant SROs must serve in both the SRO and the ATC positions, including at least two instrument or component (I/C) malfunctions and one major transient, in the ATC position. If an Instant SRO additionally serves in the BOP position, one I/C malfunction can be credited toward the two IIC malfunctions required for the ATC position.

2.

Reactivity manipulations may be conducted under normal or controlled abnormal conditions (refer to Section D.5.d) but must be significant per Section C.2.a of Appendix D. (*) Reactivity and normal evolutions may be replaced with additional instrument or component malfunctions on a 1-for-1 basis.

3.

Whenever practical, both instrument and component malfunctions should be included; only those that require verifiable actions that provide insight to the applicant's competence count toward the minimum requirements specified for the applicant's license level in the right-hand columns. ES-301 Transient and Event Checklist Form ES-301-5 Facility: Turkey Point 3 & 4 Date of Exam: 8/17/09 Operating Test No.: A E Scenarios P V 4 5 6 T M P E CREW CREW CREW CREW 0 I L N T N I T POSITION POSITION POSITION POSITION A I C S A B S A B S A B S A B M L U A T R T 0 R T 0 R T 0 R T 0 M(*) 0 C P 0 C P 0 C P 0 C P N Y R I U T P E RO RX 4 5 4 3 1 1 0 0 NOR 1 2 2 1 1 1 SRO-I ~ I/C 2,3,5 2 1,5 8 4 4 2 6a SRO-U 6b 0 MAJ 6 6 7 3 2 2 1 TS 1,2,3 3 0 2 2 RO RX 4 5 4 3 1 1 0 0 NOR 1 1 2 1 1 1 SRO-I ~ IIC 3 2,3,4 5a,6 6 4 4 2 SRO-U MAJ 6 6 7 3 2 2 1 0 TS 3,4 2 0 2 2 RO RX 4 5 4 3 1 1 0 0 NOR 1 2 2 1 1 1 SRO-I ~O-U I/C 2,5 3,4 1,5,6 7 4 4 2 MAJ 6 6 7 3 2 2 1 0 TS 3,5 2 0 2 2 Instructions:

1.

Check the applicant level and enter the operating test number and Form ES-D-1 event numbers for each event type; TS are not applicable for RO applicants. ROs must serve in both the "at-the-controls (ATC)" and "balance-of-plant (BOP)" positions; Instant SROs must serve in both the SRO and the ATC positions, including at least two instrument or component (I/C) malfunctions and one major transient, in the ATC position. If an Instant SRO additionally serves in the BOP position, one I/C malfunction can be credited toward the two IIC malfunctions required for the ATC position.

2.

Reactivity manipulations may be conducted under normal or controlled abnormal conditions (refer to Section D.5.d) but must be significant per Section C.2.a of Appendix D. (*) Reactivity and normal evolutions may be replaced with additional instrument or component malfunctions on a 1-for-1 basis.

3.

Whenever practical, both instrument and component malfunctions should be included; only those that require verifiable actions that provide insight to the applicant's competence count toward the minimum requirements specified for the applicant's license level in the right-hand columns.

ES-301 Com.e.etencies Checklist Form ES-301-6 Facility: Turkey Point 3 & 4 Date of Examination: 8/17/2009 Operating Test No.: APPLICANTS SRO-I SRO-I SRO-I Competencies I SCENARIO SCENARIO SCENARIO 4S 58 6R 4R 5S 68 Interpret/Diagnose 2,3 2,5 1,4 3,4 2,3 4,5 Events and Conditions 4,5 6a, 5,7 6,7 4,5 6,7 6,7 6b 6 Comply With and G:2 2,5 1,21 1,3 1,21 4,5 Use Procedures (1) 3,4 6a, 4,5 4,6 3,4 6,7 5,6 6b 7 7 5,6 7 Operate Control I N/A 1 2,5 1,2 1,3 N/A 4,5 2,3 1,3 80ards (2) 6a, 4,5 4,6 6,7 5,6 4,5 6b 7 7 6 Communicate "ALL I ALL ALL ALL ALL ALL ALL ALL and Interact Demonstrate 1,2 N/A N/A I N/A 1,2 I N/A _ I N/A 1 N/A Supervisory Ability (3) 3,4 3,4 5,6 5,6 7 Comply With and hr I N/A I N/A _ N/A 13,4 1 NlA Use Tech. Specs. (3) Notes: (1 ) Includes Technical Specification compliance for an RO. (2) Optional for an SRO-U. (3) Only applicable to SROs. I Instructions: Check the applicants' license type and enter one or more event numbers that will allow the examiners to evaluate every applicable competency for every applicant. ES-301 Competencies Checklist I F;acillity: Turkey Point 3 & 4 Date of Examination: 8/17/2009 Competencies JnterpreVDiagnose Events and Conditions Comply With and Use Procedures (1) Operate Control Boards (2) Communicate Demonstrate Supervisory Ability (3) Noles: N/A ALL 1,2 3,4 5,6 SRO-I SRO-I ALL ALL N/A 1,2 3,4 5,6 3,4 (1 ) Includes Technical Specification compliance for an RO, (2) Optional for an SRO-U. (3) Only applicable to SROs. Instructions: Form ES-301-6 Operating Test No.: SRO-I Check the applicants' license type and enter one or more event numbers that wilf allow the examiners to evaluate every applicable competency for every applicant.

ES-301 Transient and Event Checklist Form ES-301-5 ity: Turkey Point 3 & 4 Date of Exam: 8/17109 Operating Test No.: A E Scenarios P V 1 2 3 T M P E CREW CREW CREW CREW 0 I L N T N I T POSITION POSITION POSITION POSITION A I M C S A B S A B S A B S A B L U R T 0 R T 0 R T 0 R T 0 A T 0 C P 0 C P 0 C P 0 C P M(*) N Y R I U T P E RO RX 1 1 0 0 NOR 1 1 1 SRO-I IIC 4 4 12 0 SRO-U MAJ 2 2 1 0 TS 0 2 2 RO RX 1 1 0 0 NOR 1 1 1 SRo.l I/C 4 4 2 0 SRO-U MAJ 2 2 1 0 TS 2 2 2 RO RX 3 2 4 3 1 1 0 ~ NOR 1 1 1 1 1 SRO-I IIC 3 0 2,4 3a,5 5 4 4 2 SRO-U MAJ 5 6 7 3 2 2 1 0 TS 0 0 2 2 RO RX 1 1 0 0 NOR 1 1 1 SRO-I IIC 4 2 0 4 SRO-U MAJ 2 2 1 0 TS 0 2 2 Instructions:

1.

Check the applicant level and enter the operating test number and Form ES-D-1 event numbers for each event type; TS are not applicable for RO applicants. ROs must serve in both the "at-the-controls (ATC)" and "balance-of-plant (BOP)" positions; Instant SROs must serve in both the SRO and the ATC positions, including at least two instrument or component (IIC) malfunctions and one major transient, in the ATC position. If an Instant SRO additionally serves in the BOP position, one IIC malfunction can be credited toward the two I/C malfunctions required for the ATC position.

2.

Reactivity manipulations may be conducted under normal or controlled abnormal conditions (refer to Section D.5.d) but must be significant per Section C.2.a of Appendix D. (*) Reactivity and normal evolutions may be replaced with additional instrument or component malfunctions on a 1-for-1 basis.

3.

Whenever practical, both instrument and component malfunctions should be included; only those that require verifiable actions that provide insight to the applicant's competence count toward the minimum requirements specified for the applicant's license level in the right-hand columns. ES-301 Transient and Event Checklist Form ES-301-5 Facility: Turkey Point 3 & 4 Date of Exam: 8/17109 Operating Test No.: A E Scenarios P V 1 2 3 T M P E CREW CREW CREW CREW 0 I L N T N I T POSITION POSITION POSITION POSITION A I M C S A B S A B S A B S A B L U R T 0 R T 0 R T 0 R T 0 A T 0 C P 0 C P 0 C P 0 C P M(*) N Y R I U T P E RO RX 1 1 0 0 NOR 1 1 1 SRO-' IIC 4 4 2 0 SRO-U MAJ 2 2 1 0 TS 0 2 2 RO RX 1 1 0 0 NOR 1 1 1 SRo.l I/C 4 4 2 0 SRO-U MAJ 2 2 1 0 TS 2 2 2 RO RX 3 2 4 3 1 1 0 ~ NOR 1 1 1 1 1 SRO-I IIC 3 0 2,4 3a,5 5 4 4 2 SRO-U MAJ 5 6 7 3 2 2 1 0 TS 0 0 2 2 RO RX 1 1 0 0 NOR 1 1 1 SRO-I IIC 4 2 0 4 SRO-U MAJ 2 2 1 0 TS 0 2 2 Instructions:

1.

Check the applicant level and enter the operating test number and Form ES-D-1 event numbers for each event type; TS are not applicable for RO applicants. ROs must serve in both the "at-the-controls (ATC)" and "balance-of-plant (BOP)" positions; Instant SROs must serve in both the SRO and the ATC positions, including at least two instrument or component (IIC) malfunctions and one major transient, in the ATC position. If an Instant SRO additionally serves in the BOP position, one IIC malfunction can be credited toward the two I/C malfunctions required for the ATC position.

2.

Reactivity manipulations may be conducted under normal or controlled abnormal conditions (refer to Section D.5.d) but must be significant per Section C.2.a of Appendix D. (*) Reactivity and normal evolutions may be replaced with additional instrument or component malfunctions on a 1-for-1 basis.

3.

Whenever practical, both instrument and component malfunctions should be included; only those that require verifiable actions that provide insight to the applicant's competence count toward the minimum requirements specified for the applicant's license level in the right-hand columns.

ES-301 Competencies Checklist Form ES-301-6 Facility: Turkey Point 3 & 4 Date of Examination: 8/17/2009 Operating Test No.: Competencies Interpret/Diagnose Events and Conditions Comply With and Use Procedures (1) Operate Control Boards (2) Communicate and Interact Comply With and Use Tech. S Notes: APPLICANTS RO SCENARIO SCENARIO (1) Includes Technical Specification compliance for an RO. (2) Optional for an SRO-U. (3) Only applicable to SROs. Instructions: SCENARIO Check the applicants' license type and enter one or more event numbers that will allow the examiners to evaluate every applicable competency for every applicant. ES-301 Competencies Checklist Facility: Turkey Point 3 & 4 Date of Examination: 8/17/2009 Competencies Interpret/Diagnose Events and Conditions Comply With and Use Procedures (1) Operate Control Boards (2) Communicate Ii RO Includes Technical Specification compliance for an RO Oplional for an SRO-U. Only applicable to SROs. Instructions: Form ES-301-6 Operating Test No.: Check the applicants' license type and enter one or more event numbers that will allow the examiners to evaluate every applicable competency for every applicant.

ES-301 Transient and Event Checklist Form ES-301-5 ity: Turkey Point 3 & 4 Date of Exam: 8/17/09 Operating Test No.: A E Scenarios P V 4 5 6 T M P E CREW CREW CREW CREW 0 I L N T N I T POSITION POSITION POSITION POSITION A I C S A B S A B S A B S A B M L U R T 0 R T 0 R T 0 R T 0 A T 0 C P 0 C P 0 C P 0 C P M(*) N Y R I U T P E RO RX 1 1 0 D NOR 1 1 1 SRO-I I/C 4 4 2 D SRO-U MAJ 2 2 1 0 TS 0 2 2 RO RX 4 5 4 3 1 1 0 [Xl NOR 1 1 1 1 1 SRO-I IIC 5a,6 2 D 3 2 6 4 4 6a SRO-U 6b 0 MAJ 6 6 7 3 2 2 1 TS 0 2 2 RO RX 1 1 0 D NOR 1 1 1 SRO-I lie 4 4 2 D SRO-U MAJ 2 2 1 0 TS 0 2 2 Instructions:

1.

Check the applicant level and enter the operating test number and Form ES-D-1 event numbers for each event type; TS are not applicable for RO applicants. ROs must serve in both the "at-the-controls (ATC)" and "balance-of-plant (BOP)" positions; Instant SROs must serve in both the SRO and the ATC positions, including at least two instrument or component (IIC) malfunctions and one major transient, in the ATC position. If an Instant SRO additionally serves in the BOP position, one IIC malfunction can be credited toward the two IIC malfunctions required for the ATC position.

2.

Reactivity manipulations may be conducted under normal or controlled abnormal conditions (refer to Section D.5.d) but must be significant per Section C.2.a of Appendix D. (*) Reactivity and normal evolutions may be replaced with additional instrument or component malfunctions on a 1-for-1 basis.

3.

Whenever practical, both instrument and component malfunctions should be included; only those that require verifiable actions that provide insight to the applicant's competence count toward the minimum requirements specified for the applicant's license level in the right-hand columns. ES-301 Transient and Event Checklist Form ES-301-5 Facility: Turkey Point 3 & 4 Date of Exam: 8/17/09 Operating Test No.: A E Scenarios P V 4 5 6 T M P E CREW CREW CREW CREW 0 I L N T N I T POSITION POSITION POSITION POSITION A I C S A B S A B S A B S A B M L U R T 0 R T 0 R T 0 R T 0 A T 0 C P 0 C P 0 C P 0 C P M(*) N Y R I U T P E RO RX 1 1 0 D NOR 1 1 1 SRO-I I/C 4 4 2 D SRO-U MAJ 2 2 1 0 TS 0 2 2 RO RX 4 5 4 3 1 1 0 [Xl NOR 1 1 1 1 1 SRO-I IIC 5a,6 2 D 3 2 6 4 4 6a SRO-U 6b 0 MAJ 6 6 7 3 2 2 1 TS 0 2 2 RO RX 1 1 0 D NOR 1 1 1 SRO-I lie 4 4 2 D SRO-U MAJ 2 2 1 0 TS 0 2 2 Instructions:

1.

Check the applicant level and enter the operating test number and Form ES-D-1 event numbers for each event type; TS are not applicable for RO applicants. ROs must serve in both the "at-the-controls (ATC)" and "balance-of-plant (BOP)" positions; Instant SROs must serve in both the SRO and the ATC positions, including at least two instrument or component (IIC) malfunctions and one major transient, in the ATC position. If an Instant SRO additionally serves in the BOP position, one IIC malfunction can be credited toward the two IIC malfunctions required for the ATC position.

2.

Reactivity manipulations may be conducted under normal or controlled abnormal conditions (refer to Section D.5.d) but must be significant per Section C.2.a of Appendix D. (*) Reactivity and normal evolutions may be replaced with additional instrument or component malfunctions on a 1-for-1 basis.

3.

Whenever practical, both instrument and component malfunctions should be included; only those that require verifiable actions that provide insight to the applicant's competence count toward the minimum requirements specified for the applicant's license level in the right-hand columns.

ES-301 Competencies Checklist Form ES-301-6 Facility: Turkey Point 3 & 4 Date of Examination: 8/17/2009 Operating Test No.: Competencies I nterpretiDiagnose Events and Conditions Comply With and Use Procedures (1) Operate Control Boards (2) Communicate and Interact Comply With and Use Tech. S Notes: 4R 3,4 6,7 . 1,3 4,6 7 1,3 4,6 7 ALL NIA N/A APPLICANTS RO SCENARIO SCENARIO 58 68 2,5 4,5 6a, 6,7 6b 2,5 4,5 6a, 6,7 6b 2,5 4,5 6a, 6,7 6b ALL ALL N/A N/A N/A N/A (1) Includes Technical Specification compliance for an RO. (2) Optional for an SRO-U. (3) Only applicable to SROs. Instructions: SCENARIO Check the applicants' license type and enter one or more event numbers that will allow the examiners to evaluate every applicable competency for every applicant. ES-301 Competencies Checklist Form ES-301 -6 Facility; Turkey Point 3 & 4 Date of Examination: 8117/2009 Operating Test No_: aDDI RO Competencies 4R 5B 6B tnterpreUDiagnose 3,4 2,5 4,5 Events and Conditions 6,7 ~~ 6,7 Comply With and 1,3 2,5 4,5 Use Procedures (1) 4,6 68, 6,7 7 6b Operate Control 1,3 2,5 4,5 Boards (2) 4:,6 6a, 6,7 6b Communicate ALL ALL ALL and Interact Demonstrate N/A NlA N/A , Ability (3) Comply With and N/A N/A N/A Use Tech. . (3) Notes: (1) Includes Technical Specification compliance for an RD. (2) Optional for an SRO-U, (3) Only applicable to SROs. Instructions: Check the appficants'/icense type and enter one or more event numbers that will allow the examiners to evaluate every applicable competency for every applicant.

ES-401 1 Rev. 9 PWR examination Outline Form ES-401*2 Facility: Turkey Point Date of Exam: Aug 2009 RO KIA Category Points SRO-Only Points Tier Group K K K K K K A A A A G A2 G* Total 1 2 3 4 5 6 1 2 3 4 Total

1.

1 3 3 3 3 3 3 18 3 3 6 Emergency & 2 2 2 2 1 1 1 9 2 2 4 Abnormal Plant N/A N/A Evolutions Tier Totals 5 5 5 4 4 4 27 5 5 10 1 3 3 2 2 2 3 2 2 3 3 3 28 3 2 5

2.

Plant 2 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 10 2 1 3 Systems TIer Totals 4 4 3 3 2 4 3 3 4 4 4 38 5 3 8

3. Generic Knowledge and Abilities 1

2 3 4 10 1 2 3 4 7 Categories 2 3 2 3 1 2 2 2

1.

Ensure that at least two topics from every applicable KIA category are sampled within each tier of the RO and SRO-only outiines (i.e., except for one category in Tier 3 of the SRO-only outline, the 'Tier Totals' in each KIA category shall not be less than two).

2.

The point total for each group and tier in the proposed outline must match that specified in the table. The final point total for each group and tier may deviate by +/- 1 from that specified in the table based on NRC revisions. The final RO exam must total 75 points and the SRO-only exam must total 25 points. I

3.

Systems/evolutions within each group are identified on the associated outline; systems or evolutions that do not apply at the facility should be deleted and justified; operationally Important, site-specific systems that are I not Included on the outline should be added. Refer to ES-401, Attachment 2, for guidance regarding the elimination of inappropriate KIA statements.

4.

Select topics from as many systems and evolutions as possible; sample every system or evolution in the group before selecting a second topic for any system or evolution.

5.

Absent a plant-specific priority, only those KIAs having an importance rating (IR) of 2.5 or higher shall be selected. Use the RO and SRO ratings for the RO and SRO-only portions, respectively.

6.

Select SRO topics for TIers 1 and 2 from the shaded systems and KIA categories.

7.

The generic (G) KlAs In Tiers 1 and 2 shall be selected from Section 2 of the KIA Catalog, but the topics must be relevant to the applicable evolution or system.

S. On the following pages, enter the KIA numbers, a brief description of each topic, the topiCS' Importance ratings (IRs) for the applicable license level, and the point totals (#) for each system and category. Enter I the group and tier totals for each category in the table above; iffuel handling equipment is sampled in other I than Category A2 or G* on the SRO-only exam, enter it on the left side of Column A2 for Tier 2, Group 2 (Note

1 does not apply). Use duplicate pages for RO and SRO-only exams.

II

9.

Fo' TI" 3, "I", toplo, 'om $,,"," 2 of tho KIA """09,.M '"'" 'ho KIA ""mbe~, dHonp'OM, IR" 0 II ~ and point totals (#) on Form ES-401-3. Limit SRO selections to K/As that are linked to 10 CFR 55.43. =.J ES-401 1 Rev. 9 PWR examination Outline Form ES-401*2 Facility: Turkey Point Date of Exam: Aug 2009 RO KIA Category Points SRO-Only Points Tier Group K K K K K K A A A A G A2 G* Total 1 2 3 4 5 6 1 2 3 4 Total

1.

1 3 3 3 3 3 3 18 3 3 6 Emergency & 2 2 2 2 1 1 1 9 2 2 4 Abnormal Plant N/A N/A Evolutions Tier Totals 5 5 5 4 4 4 27 5 5 10 1 3 3 2 2 2 3 2 2 3 3 3 28 3 2 5

2.

Plant 2 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 10 2 1 3 Systems TIer Totals 4 4 3 3 2 4 3 3 4 4 4 38 5 3 8

3. Generic Knowledge and Abilities 1

2 3 4 10 1 2 3 4 7 Categories 2 3 2 3 1 2 2 2

1.

Ensure that at least two topics from every applicable KIA category are sampled within each tier of the RO and SRO-only outiines (i.e., except for one category in Tier 3 of the SRO-only outline, the 'Tier Totals' in each KIA category shall not be less than two).

2.

The point total for each group and tier in the proposed outline must match that specified in the table. The final point total for each group and tier may deviate by +/- 1 from that specified in the table based on NRC revisions. The final RO exam must total 75 points and the SRO-only exam must total 25 points. I

3.

Systems/evolutions within each group are identified on the associated outline; systems or evolutions that do not apply at the facility should be deleted and justified; operationally Important, site-specific systems that are I not Included on the outline should be added. Refer to ES-401, Attachment 2, for guidance regarding the elimination of inappropriate KIA statements.

4.

Select topics from as many systems and evolutions as possible; sample every system or evolution in the group before selecting a second topic for any system or evolution.

5.

Absent a plant-specific priority, only those KIAs having an importance rating (IR) of 2.5 or higher shall be selected. Use the RO and SRO ratings for the RO and SRO-only portions, respectively.

6.

Select SRO topics for TIers 1 and 2 from the shaded systems and KIA categories.

7.

The generic (G) KlAs In Tiers 1 and 2 shall be selected from Section 2 of the KIA Catalog, but the topics must be relevant to the applicable evolution or system.

S. On the following pages, enter the KIA numbers, a brief description of each topic, the topiCS' Importance ratings (IRs) for the applicable license level, and the point totals (#) for each system and category. Enter I the group and tier totals for each category in the table above; iffuel handling equipment is sampled in other I than Category A2 or G* on the SRO-only exam, enter it on the left side of Column A2 for Tier 2, Group 2 (Note

1 does not apply). Use duplicate pages for RO and SRO-only exams.

II Fo' Tl"' 3, ",,,ttop~, f~ ""0", of th, KIA "talog, 'M ".. "' tho KIA "omb"" "",,"p","', IR" 0 I ~ and point totals (#) on Form ES-401-3. Limit SRO selections to K/As that are linked to 10 CFR 55.43. =.J

ES-401, REV 9 T1G1 PWR EXAMINATION OUTLINE KA NAME / SAFETY FUNCTION: IR K1 K2 K3 K4 K5 K6.A1 A2 A3 A4 G RO SRO o 00BAA2.20 Pressurizer Vapor Space Accident / 3 3.4 3.6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ~ 0 0 0 /;:;.;-. n-009EG2.2.3 Small Break LOCA / 3 ~./ /

l:A I If z.(

I t5~~ r/> 2 /1 3.B 3.9 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ~ (i ~> / 011 EG2.1.7 I",-j 015AK3.04 ~/ ~22AA2.02 (Jj025AK1.01 (1) 026AA1.07 g1027AK1.03 B~' 03BEA2.0B (~) V U04AK1.01 G) 055EK3.02 Large Break LOCA / 3 4.4 4.7 oooooooooo~ RCP Malfunctions / 4 3.1 3.2 0 0 ~ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Loss of Ax Coolant Makeup / 2 3.2 3.7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ~ 0 0 0 Loss of RHR System /4 3.9 4.3 ~ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Loss of Component Cooling Water I B 2.9 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 ~ 0 0 0 0 Pressurizer Pressure Control System 2.6 2.9 ~ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Malfunction / 3 Steam Gen. Tube Rupture / 3 3.B 4.4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ~ 0 0 0 Loss of Main Feedwater / 4 4.1 4.3 ~oooooooooo Station Blackout / 6 4.3 4.6 0 0 ~ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Page 1 of 2 FORM ES-401-2 TOPIC: The effect of an open PORV on code safety, based on observation of plant parameters . (multi-unit license) KnowledgeOfth~deslgni procedural 1" and operational differences between units.... ' Ability to evaluate plant performance and make operational judgments based on operating characteristics, reactor behavior and instrument interpretation. Reduction of power to below the steady state power-to-flow limit Charging pump problems Loss of RHRS during all modes of operation Flow rates to the components and systems that are serviced by the CCWS; interactions among the components Latent heat of vaporization/condensation Viable altematives for placing plant in safe condition when condenser is not available MFW line break depressurizes the S/G (similar to a steam line break) Actions contained in EOP for loss of of/site and onsite power 212312009 12:56 PM ES-401, REV 9 T1G1 PWR EXAMINATION OUTLINE KA NAME / SAFETY FUNCTION: IR K1 K2 K3 K4 K5 K6.A1 A2 A3 A4 G RO SRO

\\

00BAA2.20 G Pressurizer Vapor Space Accident / 3 3.4 3.6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ~ 0 0 0 3.B 3.9 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ~ (i ~> / 011 EG2.1.7 Large Break LOCA / 3 4.4 4.7 oooooooooo~ 1".- 015AK3.04 ~I RCP Malfunctions / 4 3.1 3.2 0 0 ~ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ~22AA2.02 Loss of Ax Coolant Makeup / 2 3.2 3.7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ~ 0 0 0 (Jj025AK1.01 Loss of RHR System /4 3.9 4.3 ~ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 (1) 026AA1.07 Loss of Component Cooling Water I B 2.9 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 ~ 0 0 0 0 g1027AK1.03 Pressurizer Pressure Control System 2.6 2.9 ~ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Malfunction / 3 B~' 03BEA2.0B Steam Gen. Tube Rupture / 3 3.B 4.4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ~ 0 0 0 054AK1.01 Loss of Main Feedwater / 4 4.1 4.3 ~oooooooooo G) 055EK3.02 Station Blackout / 6 4.3 4.6 0 0 ~ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Page 1 of 2 FORM ES-401-2 TOPIC: The effect of an open PORV on code safety, based on observation of plant parameters (multi-unit license) Knowledgeo! th~deslgni procedural r and operational differences between units. Ability to evaluate plant performance and make operational judgments based on operating characteristics, reactor behavior and instrument interpretation. Reduction of power to below the steady state power-to-flow limit Charging pump problems Loss of RHRS during ali modes of operation Flow rates to the components and systems that are serviced by the CCWS; interactions among the components Latent heat of vaporization/condensation Viable altematives for placing plant in safe condition when condenser is not available MFW line break depressurizes the S/G (similar to a steam line break) Actions contained in EOP for loss of of/site and onsite power 212312009 12:56 PM

ES-401, REV 9 KA NAME / SAFETY FUNCTION: ,. W 056AG2.4.41 Loss of Off-site Power / 6 ~) 057,***** V /\\ . I 065AA 1.01 ~' (jJWE04EK2., v::,.. ) WEOSEK2.2 ~ Loss of Instrument Air / 8 LOCA Outside Containment / 3 Inadequate Heat Transfer - Loss of Secondary Heat Sink / 4 T1G1 PWR EXAMINATION OUTLINE IR K1 K2 K3 K4 K5 K6 A1 A2 A3 A4 G RO SRO 2.9 4.6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ~ 3.5 3.6 0 0 0 0 0 0 ~ 0 0 [] 0 2.7 2.5 0 0 0 0 0 0 ~ 0 0 0 0 3.5 3.9 0 ~ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3.9 4.2 0 ~ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 WE11EK3.1 Loss of Emergency Coolant Recirc. I 4 3.3 3.9 oo~oooooooo FORM ES-401-2 TOPIC: Knowledge of the emergency action level thresholds and classifications. RWST and VCT valves Remote manual loaders Components and functions of control and safety systems, including instrumentation, signals. interlocks, failure modes and automatic and manual features. Facility's heat removal systems, including primary coolant. emergency coolant, the decay heat removal systems and relations between the proper operation of these systems to the operation of the facility. Facility operating characteristics during transient conditions, including coolant chemistry and the effects of temperature, pressure and reactivity changes and operating limitations and reasons for these operating characteristics. () ) WE12EK2.2 Steam Une Rupture - Excessive Heat 3.6 3.9 0 ~ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 b 0 Facility's heat removal systems. including primary 0' Transfer / 4 coolant, emergency coolant, the decay heat removal systems and relations between the proper operation of these systems to the operation of the facility. Page 2 of 2 212312009 12:56 PM ES-401, REV 9 KA NAME / SAFETY FUNCTION: ,. W 056AG2.4.41 Loss of Off-site Power / 6 G 057 M 1.04 Lo~ of Vola' AC '0". Boo /6 /\\ . ! 065AA 1.01 ~ (]J WE04EK2.1 v::,.. ) WEOSEK2.2 ~ Loss of Instrument Air / 8 LOCA Outside Containment / 3 Inadequate Heat Transfer - Loss of Secondary Heat Sink / 4 T1G1 PWR EXAMINATION OUTLINE IR K1 K2 K3 K4 K5 K6 A1 A2 A3 A4 G RO SRO 2.9 4.6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ~ 3.5 3.6 0 0 0 0 0 0 ~ 0 0 [] 0 2.7 2.5 0 0 0 0 0 0 ~ 0 0 0 0 3.5 3.9 0 ~ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3.9 4.2 0 ~ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 WE11EK3.1 Loss of Emergency Coolant Recirc. I 4 3.3 3.9 oo~oooooooo FORM ES-401-2 TOPIC: Knowledge of the emergency action level thresholds and classifications. RWST and VCT valves Remote manual loaders Components and functions of control and safety systems, including instrumentation, signals. interlocks, failure modes and automatic and manual features. Facility's heat removal systems, including primary coolant. emergency coolant, the decay heat removal systems and relations between the proper operation of these systems to the operation of the facility. Facility operating characteristics during transient conditions, including coolant chemistry and the effects of temperature, pressure and reactivity changes and operating limitations and reasons for these operating characteristics. Q) ---::-----------------------------------_.. _--- WE12EK2.2 Steam Une Rupture - Excessive Heat 3.6 3.9 0 ~ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Facility's heat removal systems. including primary \\ Transfer / 4 coolant, emergency coolant, the decay heat removal systems and relations between the proper operation of these systems to the operation of the facility. Page 2 of 2 212312009 12:56 PM

ES-401, REV 9 KA NAME / SAFETY FUNCTION: (0 ~. -oG3AKB:tl3-( \\y-(-<,.~jd a: Op4AK3,01 ~/ @028AG2212 036AK1.03 (j) Dropped Control Rod I 1 (1~'- ~/(?/ I; Emergency Boration / 1 Pressurizer Level Malfunction / 2 Fuel Handling Accident / 8 ~ qs9AA2.03 Accidental Liquid RadWaste ReI. /9 t::Y r:;jy068AK2.02 (f) 074EK1.01 ~ -", WE02EK2.1 t~) '\\ 6)JWE16EA1.1 Control Room Evac. / 8 Inad. Core Cooling / 4 SI Termination / 3 High Containment Radiation / 9 T1G2 PWR EXAMINATION OUTLINE IR K1 K2 K3 K4 K5 K6 A1 A2 A3 A4 G RO SRO 3.4 3.7 oo~oooooooo 4.1 4.4 oo~oooooooo 3.7 4.1 oooooooooo~ 4 4,3 ~OOOOOOOOOO 3.1 3.6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ~ 0 0 0 3.7 3.9 0 ~ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4,3 4.7 ~ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3.4 3.9 0 ~ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3.1 3.2 0 0 0 0 0 0 ~ 0 0 0 0 Page 1 of 1 FORM ES-401-2 TOPIC: Turbine automatic runback with reactor in order to balance power output When emergency boration is required Knowledge of surveillance procedures. Indications of approaching criticality ~Falluremodes" their symptoms and the causes of, 'inlsleadlnglndications on a radioactive-liquid monitor Reactor trip system Methods of calculating subcooling margin Components and functions of control and safety systems, including instrumentation, signals, interlocks, failure modes and automatic and manual features. Components and functions of control and safety systems, including instrumentation, Signals, interlocks, failure modes and automatic and manual features. II~ ..,) 212312009 12:56 PM ES-401, REV 9 KA NAME / SAFETY FUNCTION: Dropped Control Rod I 1 (1~'- ~/(?/ I; Emergency Boration / 1 Gj)2.AG22. " Pressurizer Level Malfunction / 2 036AK1.03 (j) Fuel Handling Accident / 8 ~---gOS-9-A-A-2-.0-=3-----A-c-cj---de-n-ta--:I-:-L-:-iq-u,--id-=A=-a-cdc-:W-,-aste ReI. /9 t::Y r:;jy068AK2.02 f2l 074EK1.01 19 Control Room Evac. / 8 Inad. Core Cooling / 4 T1G2 PWR EXAMINATION OUTLINE IR K1 K2 K3 K4 K5 K6 A1 A2 A3 A4 G AO SAO 3.4 3.7 oo~oooooooo FORM ES-401-2 TOPIC: Turbine automatic runback with reactor in order to balance power output 4.1 4.4 o 0 ~ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 When emergency boration is required ... ------.-:::--c==------:-:---:--,------:;------,-::---------:--------------- o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ~ Knowledge of surveillance procedures. 3.7 4.1 4 4.3 ~OOOOOOOOOO 3.1 3.6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ~ 0 0 0 3.7 3.9 0 ~ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4.3 4.7 ~ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Indications of approaching criticality ~Falluremodes,. their symptoms and the causes of, 'inlsleadlnglndications on a radioactive-liquid monitor Reactor trip system Methods of calculating subcooling margin .,--::::::--,,-----::..,--:=---:---:----:--:----------_.. _.-----._---

(i: ;' WE02EK2.1 SI Termination / 3 3.4 3.9 0 ~ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Components and functions of control and safety systems, including instrumentation, signals, interlocks, failure modes and automatic and manual features.

~) ~WE16EA1.1 High Containment Radiation/9 3.1 3.2 0 0 0 0 0 0 ~ 0 0 0 0 Page 1 of 1 Components and functions of control and safety systems, including instrumentation, Signals, interlocks, failure modes and automatic and manual features. II~ ..,) 212312009 12:56 PM

ES-401, REV 9 T2G1 PWR EXAMINATION OUTLINE FORM ES-401-2 KA NAME / SAFETY FUNCTION: IR K1 K2 K3 K4 K5 K6 A 1 A2 A3 A4 G TOPIC: RO SRO .~ Reactor Coolant Pump 2.6 2.5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ~ 0 0 Motor current 0(7*'>4 ~'L'3. . Ie II~.s-bit ~:1 r 003A4.05 03 Reactor Coolant Pump 3.1 3.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ~ 0 RCP seal leakage detection instrumentation ~~~--~~~~~~--~--~----~--~~~-=~~~~~~~=-~~-=----~~~~------~~--~------------- r/:- 004K6.31 Chemical and Volume Control 3.1 3.5 0 DOD 0 ~ 0 0 0 0 0 Seal injection system and limits on flow range (is) 005A4.05 Residual Heat Removal 2.8 2.8 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ~ 0 Position of RWST recirculation valve (locked when not in use, continuously monitored when in use). --~----~~----~--------------------------------------------------~,-----~-=----~--------~--------- G:) C,;;6A;:_ ~::~'1/;j; 4.2 4.3 00000000 [ii] 0 0 !~~,~~,~~~~~.".., @006K6.02 Emergency Core Cooling 3.4 3.9 0 0 0 0 0 ~ 0 0 0 0 0 Core flood tanks (accumulators) ~J 007G2.2.40 f~) DY 008K4.07 (§;_ _ 010K2.04 ,f, I[ "'7' /~) 010K4.02 CY (}) 012K1.02 Pressurizer Relief/Quench Tank Component Cooling Water Pressurizer Pressure Control Pressurizer Pressure Control Reactor Protection 3.4 4.7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ~ 2.6 2.7 DDD~DDDDDDD 2.7 2.9 0 ~ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3.0 3.4 0 0 0 ~ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3.4 3.7 ~ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 DOD Page 1 of 3 Ability to apply technical specifications for a system. Operation of the CCW swing-bus power supply and its associated breakers and controls Indicator for code safety position Prevention of uncovering PZR heaters 125V dc system 212312009 12:56 PM ES-401, REV 9 T2G1 PWR EXAMINATION OUTLINE FORM ES-401-2 KA NAME / SAFETY FUNCTION: IR K1 K2 K3 K4 K5 K6 A 1 A2 A3 A4 G TOPIC: RO SRO ~ Reactor Coolant Pump 2.6 2.5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ~ 0 0 Motor current 0(7)4..s,(..'5. -:-:-:-:-...,--:--_IA=-~_-=-.s--Lb.:...:.j r.L::Ic:......~'J:.'L...l ___ --:--:-~----=-____=::___=_==--=---=:_=_-=_==__=_-_=_=___:__,___:____:_____,_--___:_-.-- __ _ r 003A4.05 Reactor Coolant Pump 3.1 3.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ~ 0 RCP seal leakage detection instrumentation 03 ~~------~~~--~--~~~-----------------=~~~~-=-==---~-=------~--~----------~------------------- r/:- 004K6.31 Chemical and Volume Control 3.1 3.5 0 DOD 0 ~ 0 0 0 0 0 Seal injection system and limits on flow range (is) Residual Heat Removal ~J 007G2.2.40 Pressurizer Relief/Quench Tank 008K4.07 Component Cooling Water r!f; 01OK2o< Pressurizer Pressure Control /~) 010K4.02 CY Pressurizer Pressure Control (f) 012K1.02 Reactor Protection 2.8 2.8 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ~ 0 3.4 4.7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ~ 2.6 2.7 DDD~DDDDDDD 2.7 2.9 0 ~ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3.0 3.4 0 0 0 ~ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3.4 3.7 ~ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 DOD Page 1 of 3 Position of RWST recirculation valve (locked when not in use, continuously monitored when in use). Ability to apply technical specifications for a system. Operation of the CCW swing-bus power supply and its associated breakers and controls Indicator for code safety position Prevention of uncovering PZR heaters 125V dc system 212312009 12:56 PM

ES-401, REV 9 T2G1 PWR EXAMINATION OUTLINE FORM ES-401-2 KA NAME / SAFETY FUNCTION: IR K1 K2 K3 K4 K5 K6 A1 A2 A3 A4 G TOPIC: RO SRO rfj) 012K2.01 Reactor Protection 3.3 3.7 O~OOOOOOOOO RPS channels, components and interconnections 013A2.01 Engineered Safety Features Actuation 4.6 4.8 OOOOOOO~OOO LOCA Jp) ~~022K1.04 Containment Cooling 2.9 2.9 ~OOOOOOOOOO Chilled water .~ ~}22K3.02 Containment Cooling 3.0 3.3 OO~OOOOOOOO Containment instrumentation readings tAL--, @26A3.01 Containment Spray 4.3 4.5 OOOOOODU~OO Pump starts and correct MOV positioning (09A1.05 Main and Reheat Steam 3.2 3.3 OOOOOO~OOOO RCS T-ave @O'J9G2445 Main and Reheat Steam 4.1 4.3 OOOOOOOOOO~ Ability to prioritize and interpret the significance of each annunciator or alarm. "") 059K3.03 Main Feedwater 3.5 3.7. OO~OOOOOOOO S/GS (i)61K5.02 Auxiliary/Emergency Feedwater 3.2 3.6 OOOD~OODOOO Decay heat sources and magnitude 6"'"r2K1.02 AC Electrical Distribution 4.1 4.4 ~OOOOOOOOOO ED/G d~ / DC Electrical Distribution C~.f63A4.02 ~. \\ 2.8 2.9 OOOOOOOOO~O Battery voltage indicator Page 2 of 3 212312009 12:56 PM ES-401, REV 9 T2G1 PWR EXAMINATION OUTLINE FORM ES-401-2 KA NAME / SAFETY FUNCTION: IR K1 K2 K3 K4 K5 K6 A1 A2 A3 A4 G TOPIC: RO SRO rfj) 012K2.01 Reactor Protection 3.3 3.7 O~OOOOOOOOO RPS channels, components and interconnections 013A2.01 Engineered Safety Features Actuation 4.6 4.8 OOOOOOO~OOO LOCA Jp) ~~022K1.04 Containment Cooling 2.9 2.9 ~OOOOOOOOOO Chilled water .~ ~}22K3.02 Containment Cooling 3.0 3.3 OO~OOOOOOOO Containment instrumentation readings tAL--, @26A3.01 Containment Spray 4.3 4.5 OOOOOODU~OO Pump starts and correct MOV positioning (09A1.05 Main and Reheat Steam 3.2 3.3 OOOOOO~OOOO RCS T-ave @O'J9G2445 Main and Reheat Steam 4.1 4.3 OOOOOOOOOO~ Ability to prioritize and interpret the significance of each annunciator or alarm. "") 059K3.03 Main Feedwater 3.5 3.7. OO~OOOOOOOO S/GS (i)61K5.02 Auxiliary/Emergency Feedwater 3.2 3.6 OOOD~OODOOO Decay heat sources and magnitude 6"'"r2K1.02 AC Electrical Distribution 4.1 4.4 ~OOOOOOOOOO ED/G d~ / DC Electrical Distribution C~.f63A4.02 ~. \\ 2.8 2.9 OOOOOOOOO~O Battery voltage indicator Page 2 of 3 212312009 12:56 PM

ES-401, REV 9 KA NAME / SAFETY FUNCTION: ~ . '-j' 064G2.2.42 /{./ J ,~064K6.08 1,;'--\\\\; i ~ 073K5.01 ~) /:-"\\076A2.01 --- Emergency Diesel Generator Emergency Diesel Generator Process Radiation Monitoring Service Water T2G1 PWR EXAMINATION OUTLINE IR K1 K2 K3 K4 K5 K6 A 1 A2 A3* A4 G RO SRO 3.9 4.6 OOO[JOOOOOO~ 3.2 3.3 OOOOO~OOOOO 2.5 3.0 OOOO~OOOOOO 3.5 3.7 OOODOOO~OOO FORM ES-401-2 TOPIC: Ability to recognize system parameters that are entry-level conditions for Technical Specifications Fuel oil storage tanks Radiation theory, including sources, types, units and effects Loss of SWS <<2. 1 ?/ '\\ --,--------____ ------------___ --c::=_~ -.---.. -=---=-==--=:=----=----_:_------------- ~) 078K2.02 Instrument Air 3.3 3.5 0 ~ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Emergency air compressor (: '-,,~,) .. 103A1.01 .. ~ L,.-/ _/ 3.7 4.1 OOOOOO~OOOO Containment Containment pressure, temperature and humidity I) Page 3 of 3 212312009 12:56 PM ES-401, REV 9 KA NAME / SAFETY FUNCTION: Emergency Diesel Generator Emergency Diesel Generator 073K5.01 Process Radiation Monitoring ~) /:-"\\076A2.01 --- Service Water T2G1 PWR EXAMINATION OUTLINE IR K1 K2 K3 K4 K5 K6 A 1 A2 A3* A4 G RO SRO 3.9 4.6 OOO[JOOOOOO~ 3.2 3.3 OOOOO~OOOOO 2.5 3.0 OOOO~OOOOOO 3.5 3.7 OOODOOO~OOO FORM ES-401-2 TOPIC: Ability to recognize system parameters that are entry-level conditions for Technical Specifications Fuel oil storage tanks Radiation theory, including sources, types, units and effects Loss of SWS <<2. 1 ?/ '\\ -=-=-::-:-:-=~----,---,--:--:-:---------::-=----::-::--=-=:-==-c=- -.---.. ------------------------- ~) 078K2.02 Instrument Air 3.3 3.5 0 ~ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Emergency air compressor (: '-.,~,) .. 103A1.01 ... ~ L,.-/ _/ Containment 3.7 4.1 OOOOOO~OOOO Containment pressure, temperature and humidity Page 3 of 3 212312009 12:56 PM

ES-401, REV 9 KA NAME / SAFETY FUNCTION: /~ \\ 011K6.06 I (-)I ( *.:J}16G2.4.3 @' 029A2.03 > :)) 'y Pressurizer Level Control Non-nuclear Instrumentation Containment Purge T2G2 PWR EXAMINATION OUTLINE IR K1 K2 K3 K4 K5 K6 A1 A2 A3 A4 G RO SRO 2.5 2.8 0 0 0 0 0 ~ 0 0 0 0 0 3.7 3.9 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ~ 2.7 3.1 000 0 0 0 0 ~ 000 FORM ES-401-2 TOPIC: Correlation of demand signal indication on charging pump flow valve controller to the valve position Ability to identify post-accident instrumentation. Startup operations and the associated required valve lineups

~--~----~--------------------------------------------------~-----------------------------------

Spent Fuel Pool Cooling 2.7 3.3 0 0 0 0 0 0 ~ 0 0 0 0 Spent fuel pool water level ., 033Al.01 /' \\ CY -------=-----,-----~~r==lFlnr 035A4.02 /~::\\ o Steam Generator ooooooooo~o Fill of dry S/G 2.7 2.8 045K4,44 (0 Main Turbine Generator 2.5 2.8 ooo~ooooooo Impulse pressure mode control of steam dumps 055K3.01 Condenser Air Removal 2.5 2.7 0 0 ~ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Main condenser / Lit Z* G;; ,~);,j,//-OO8A&.e't1 Liquid Radwaste 2,5 2.4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ~ 0 0

'J:;vaporator pressure control I:>>

111 It \\Y (} C.y/ rl 1,. t 1 1ru2~ ttl J (/~y 072K1.04 C~ f!p75K2.03 ~/ v\\ /.,/ Area Radiation Monitoring Circulating Water 3,3 3.5 ~oooooooooo Control room ventilation 2.6 2,7 0 ~ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Emergency/essential SWS pumps Page 1 of 1 212312009 12:56 PM ES-401, REV 9 KA NAME / SAFETY FUNCTION: 029A2.03 > :)) 'y Pressurizer Level Control Non-nuclear Instrumentation Containment Purge T2G2 PWR EXAMINATION OUTLINE IR K1 K2 K3 K4 K5 K6 A1 A2 A3 A4 G RO SRO 2.5 2.a 0 0 0 0 0 ~ 0 0 0 0 0 3.7 3.9 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ~ 2.7 3.1 000 0 0 0 0 ~ 000 FORM ES-401-2 TOPIC: Correlation of demand signal indication on charging pump flow valve controller to the valve position Ability to identify post-accident instrumentation. Startup operations and the associated required valve lineups

~-~---~------------------------------------------~-------------------------------

Spent Fuel Pool Cooling 2.7 3.3 0 0 0 0 0 0 ~ 0 0 0 0 Spent fuel pool water level 033A1.01 /~\\ CY ---------------------------------------------- 035A4.02 Steam Generator 2.7 2.8 ooooooooo~o Fill of dry S/G 045K4.44 (0 Main Turbine Generator 2.5 2.a ooo~ooooooo Impulse pressure mode control of steam dumps 055K3.01 Condenser Air Removal 2.5 2.7 0 0 ~ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Main condenser / Lit Z* l'ir/-,,--a-A-fr:e1-1-.

L-iq-u-id-R=-a-d-w-a-st-e---------------2-.5---2-.4---0--0---0--0--O--O---O--O--~--O-O---""'\\-Ev-a-po-r-at-o-r p-' r-es-s-u-re-co-nt-ro-I-------------

~)C,y/ fit,. t 1 lrul~ Y /t I It; v\\ /,,/ Area Radiation Monitoring Circulating Water 3.3 3.5 ~oooooooooo 2.6 2.7 0 ~ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Page 1 of 1 Control room ventilation Emergency/essential SWS pumps 212312009 12:56 PM

ES-401, REV 9 KA NAME I SAFETY FUNCTION: /;::::- G2.1.21 Conduct of operations ( '.1 <{/ -...../. Conduct of operations G2.2.11 Equipment Control T3 PWR EXAMINATION OUTLINE IR K1 K2 K3 K4 K5 K6 A1 A2 A3 A4 G RO SRO 3.5 3.6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ~ 2.5 3.4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ~ 2.3 3.3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ~ FORM ES-401-2 TOPIC: Ability verify the controlled procedure copy. Knowledge of new and spent fuel movement procedures Knowledge of the process for controlling temporary design changes. , L\\ J board layouts. systems. instrumentation and procedural C0 /f'"'"""\\G2.2.4 Equipment Control 3.6 3.6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ~ (multi-unit) Ability to explain the variations in control \\.(i actions between units at a facility. tt/-. \\G2.2.44 Equipment Control 4.2 4.4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ~ Ability to interpret control room indications to verify the (/11/ ;; \\ ; status and operation of a system. and understand how operator actions and directives affect plant and system conditions ,..* -~\\ G2.3.11 uV Radiation Control 3.8 4.3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ~ Ability to control radiation releases.

=-~~~--~~c=_=~--~~~~--=_=_=_~----=_----~=_~

(1 ~. ". G2.3.13 Radiation Control 3.4 3.8 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ~ Knowledge of radiological safety procedures pertaining to .. 1 2,.,/ licensed operator duties ~ ,r:;'. G2.4.2 Emergency Procedures/Plans 4.5 4.6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ~ Knowledge of system set points, interlocks and automatic actions associated with EOP entry conditions. ~ U.

'T: b-2-.4C-A-:5:-------Eo-m-e-rg-e-n-cy---=-p-roc-ed--:-u-res--c:/p:c:la-n-s--------4-.1---4-.3--=O=--O---O=--=O=-O=--::O=--=O:---O=--=O=--=O=-~=----:A-:-b-=iIi-ty-to-. -pn-:-'o-r-=iti-ze-a-n-d:-:i-nt-e-rp-re-t-:th-e-s-:-ig-n-:ifc-ica-n-c-e-o-=f-e-ac-=h---

V II-I I annunciator or alarm. -/:. t!i}2.4.6 Emergency Procedures/Plans 3.7 4.7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ~ Knowledge symptom based EOP mitigation strategies. Page 1 of 1 2123/2009 12:56 PM ES-401, REV 9 T3 PWR EXAMINATION OUTLINE KA NAME I SAFETY FUNCTION: IR K1 K2 K3 K4 K5 K6 A1 A2 A3 A4 G RO SRO Conduct of operations 3.5 3.6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ~ Conduct of operations 2.5 3.4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ~ Equipment Control 2.3 3.3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ~ FORM ES-401-2 TOPIC: Ability verify the controlled procedure copy. Knowledge of new and spent fuel movement procedures Knowledge of the process for controlling temporary design changes. C0 /f""""\\G2.2.4 Equipment Control 3.6 3.6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ~ (multi-unit) Ability to explain the variations in control

:.' L\\)

board layouts, systems. instrumentation and procedural \\.\\. actions between units at a facility. tt /-\\\\-=G-=2-=.2-.44----=E:-q-CUi-pm-en-t--:c=-o-n-tro-CI----------:4--:.2:---4.--:4-=O:-cO--:O=---=O:-cO=--=O=-=O:---:O=--=O=--=O:-c~=----:-AbC""I::c*lity:--to-:-in-te-rp-r-et-c-o-nt-ro-=l-roo-m-:-in-:dl:-ca-tC""io-n-s-to-v-e--:ri-:-fy-thc-e--- (/1~

f.... J* /

status and operation of a system, and understand how operator actions and directives affect plant and system conditions

..* -.\\ G2.3.11 uV Radiation Control 3.8 4.3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ~

Ability to control radiation releases. (1 ~.. G2.3.13 Radiation Control "12..,/ ~ 304 3.8 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ~ Knowledge of radiological safety procedures pertaining to licensed operator duties -=-=~------=~----~--~--=~--------:~--=---==~--=~=-~~--:--:--=--==-=~--~--:--~-----------.,---:~--~----~ ~. \\~. ;\\, G2.4.2 Emergency Procedures/Plans 4.5 4.6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ~ Knowledge of system set points. interlocks and automatic ~ actions associated with EOP entry conditions. fr..

r:b-=2-.4:-o4--:5:------E:-m-e-rg-e-n-cy-=:-p-roc-ed--:-u-res---::/p:c:la-n-s--------4-.1---4-.3---0--0---0--0--0---0---0-0---0---0--~------A-b-ili-ty-to--pn-'o-r-iti-ze-a-n-d-i-nt-e-rp-re-t-th-e-s-ig-n-if-ica-n-c-e-o-f-e-ac-h---

V II-I I annunciator or alarm. -/:. ~/)2.4.6 Emergency Procedures/Plans 3.7 4.7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ~ Knowledge symptom based EOP mitigation strategies. Page 1 of 1 2123/2009 12:56 PM

(lY' ES-401, AEV 9 KA NAME I SAFETY FUNCTION: 007EG2.4.41 Reactor Trip - Stabilization - Recovery / 1 /- .009EA2.20 Small Break LOCA / 3 SAO T1G1 PWA EXAMINATION OUTLINE IR Kl K2 K3 K4 K5 K6 A 1 A2 A3 A4 G RO SRO 2.9 4.6 OOOOOOOODO~ 2.6 2.9 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ~ 0 0 0 FOAM ES-401-2 TOPIC: Knowledge of the emergency action level thresholds and classifications. Containment vent damper position indicator bY ~~~~~--~~~~~~--~----~~~~~~~~~~~~~=-~~~~--~~--~~~~~. __ <~. 022AA2.01 Loss of Rx Coolant Makeup / 2 3.2 3.8 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ~ 0 0 0 Whether charging line leak exists (~) ~~~~~--~~~~--~~-------~~~--~-=~--=---~--~~=-~-=~~ ~ 057 AA2.07 Loss of Vital AC Inst. Bus / 6 3.3 3.5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ~ 0 0 0 Valve indicator of charging pump suction valve from .1G RWST I-I well EG2.2.4 Loss of Emergency Coolant Reclrc. / 4 4.2 4.4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ~ Ability to interpret control room indications to verify the ~ i '/ status and operation of a system, and understand how ~~I operator actions and directives affect plant and system conditions @ wo12EG2.4.5 Steam Une Rupture - Excessive Heat Transfer / 4 4.2 4.0 OODOOOOOOO~ Page 1 of 1 Ability to verify system alarm setpoints and operate controls Identified in the alarm response manual. 212312009 12:56 PM ES-401, AEV 9 KA NAME I SAFETY FUNCTION: 007EG2.4.41 Reactor Trip - Stabilization - Recovery / 1 /- .009EA2.20 Small Break LOCA / 3 SAO T1G1 PWA EXAMINATION OUTLINE IR Kl K2 K3 K4 K5 K6 A 1 A2 A3 A4 G RO SRO 2.9 4.6 OOOOOOOODO~ 2.6 2.9 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ~ 0 0 0 FOAM ES-401-2 TOPIC: Knowledge of the emergency action level thresholds and classifications. Containment vent damper position indicator bY ~~~~~--~~~~~~--~----~~~~~~~~~~~~~=-~~~~--~~--~~~~~ <~ 022AA2.01 Loss of Rx Coolant Makeup / 2 3.2 3.8 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ~ 0 0 0 Whether charging line leak exists C1i/ ~~~~~--~~~~--~~-------~~~--~-=~--=---~--~~=-~-=~~ ~ 057 AA2 07 Loss of Vital AC Inst. Bus / 6 3.3 3.5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ~ 0 0 0 Valve indicator of charging pump suction valve from -/1G RWST -.~----- I-

'.* \\ well EG2.2.4 Loss of Emergency Coolant Recirc. / 4 4.2 4.4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ~

Ability to interpret control room indications to verify the ~ i \\ I status and operation of a system, and understand how ~~j operator actions and directives affect plant and system conditions @ wo12EG2.4.5 Steam Une Rupture - Excessive Heat Transfer / 4 4.2 4.0 OODOOOOOOO~ Page 1 of 1 Ability to verify system alarm setpoints and operate controls Identified in the alarm response manual. 212312009 12:56 PM

ES-401, AEV 9 KA NAME / SAFETY FUNCTION: 63 _"-_'.. ': 003AG2.4.47 ~I ' 1;4 Dropped Control Rod 11 Pressurizer Level Malfunction I 2 /:"'\\ 028AA2.01 SAO T1G2 PWR EXAMINATION OUTLINE IR K1 K2 K3 K4 K5 K6 A1 A2 A3 A4 G RO SRO 4.2 4.2 oooooooooo~ 3.4 3.6 ooooooo~ooo FORM ES-401-2 TOPIC: Ability to diagnose and recognize trends in an accurate and timely manner utilizing the appropriate control room reference material. PZR level indicators and alarms

~-------

.~' 036AA2.02 Fuel Handling Accident I 8 3.4 4.1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ~ 0 0 0 Occurrence of a fuel handling incident {J;y~~--:-=---=--~-__::_::__~__==_=__=_=__===__=_c=_=_==_= ~ ( c'() 068AG2A20 Control Room Evac. 18 3.8 4.3 0 0 0 DO 0 0 0 0 0 ~ ~ 'f n I Page 1 of 1 Knowledge of operational implications of EOP warnings, cautions and notes. 2123/2009 12:56 PM ES-401, AEV 9 KA NAME / SAFETY FUNCTION: 63 _"-_'.. \\ 003AG2.4.47 ~I ' 1;4 Dropped Control Rod 11 Pressurizer Level Malfunction I 2 /:"'\\ 028AA2.01 SAO T1G2 PWR EXAMINATION OUTLINE IR K1 K2 K3 K4 K5 K6 A1 A2 A3 A4 G RO SRO 4.2 4.2 oooooooooo~ 3.4 3.6 ooooooo~ooo FORM ES-401-2 TOPIC: Ability to diagnose and recognize trends in an accurate and timely manner utilizing the appropriate control room reference material. PZR level indicators and alarms

~-=---~------~~----~--------.

036AA2.02 Fuel Handling Accident I 8 3.4 4.1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ~ 0 0 0 Occurrence of a fuel handling incident (~~y~~--:-=---=--~--=-=---:-::--=-==-=--=-=-=-=-:=-=--==-= ~ ( c'() 068AG2A20 Control Room Evac. 18 3.8 4.3 0 0 0 DO 0 0 0 0 0 ~ ~ 'f n I Page 1 of 1 Knowledge of operational implications of EOP warnings, cautions and notes. 2123/2009 12:56 PM

ES-401, REV 9 SRO T2G1 PWR EXAMINATION OUTLINE FORM ES-401-2 KA NAME / SAFETY FUNCTION: IR K1 K2 K3 K4 K5 K6 A1 A2 A3 A4 G TOPIC: RO SRO ~005A2.04 Residual Heat Removal 2.9 2.9 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ~ 0 0 0 RHR valve malfunction 00BG2.4.35 Component Cooling Water 3.B 4.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ~ Knowledge of local auxiliary operator tasks during ~'\\ emergency and the resultant operational effects o ~l) __

=----------=-_____

-::----:-----=--=-==-=-~=-=-=-=-=--==-----:-:---:----:------:---__ /T"012G2.1.27 Reactor Protection 3.9 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ~ Knowledge of system purpose and or function. V fL. y., y., ) ~

~----------~----------------~--

~ 039A2.03 Main and Reheat Steam 3.4 3.7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ~ 0 0 0 Indications and alarms for main steam and area radiation ~ monitors (during SGTR) @ 062A2.15 AC Electrical Distribution 2.B 3.2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ~ 0 0 0 Page 1 of 1 Consequence of paralleling out-of-phase/mismatch in volts 212312009 12:56 PM ES-401, REV 9 SRO T2G1 PWR EXAMINATION OUTLINE FORM ES-401-2 KA NAME / SAFETY FUNCTION: IR K1 K2 K3 K4 K5 K6 A1 A2 A3 A4 G TOPIC: RO SRO ~005A2.04 Residual Heat Removal 2.9 2.9 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ~ 0 0 0 RHR valve malfunction 00BG2.4.35 Component Cooling Water 3.B 4.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ~ Knowledge of local auxiliary operator tasks during ~'" emergency and the resultant operational effects o ~1) __

=---------=-_____

-::---:-----=--=-==-=-~=-=-=-=-=-==-----:-:---:----:-----:---__ ~012G2.1.27 Reactor Protection 3.9 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ~ Knowledge of system purpose and or function. V' fL. y., y., ). ~

~----------~----------------~--

~ 039A2.03 Main and Reheat Steam 3.4 3.7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ~ 0 0 0 Indications and alarms for main steam and area radiation ~ monitors (during SGTR) @ 062A2.15 AC Electrical Distribution 2.B 3.2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ~ 0 0 0 Page 1 of 1 Consequence of paralleling out-of-phase/mismatch in volts 212312009 12:56 PM

ES-401, REV 9 SRO T2G2 PWR EXAMINATION OUTLINE KA NAME / SAFETY FUNCTION: IR K1 K2 K3 K4 K5 K6 A 1 A2 A3 A4 G RO SRO Liquid Radwaste 3.8 4.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ~ FORM ES-401-2 TOPIC: Ability to explain and apply all system limits and precautions. 868G2132 @'A2.06 @079A2-.o1

---:---:---------::--c-::-::---==-==--=-==-==-==--=--=-==-=:=-:c=-----=-----:--:-:----,--,--,.-----------

Waste Gas Disposal 2.4 2.5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ~ 0 0 0 Supply failure to the isolation valve Station Air 2.9 3.2 0 0 0 0 0 0 U ~ 0 0 0 ~: ;Cross-connection with lAS ~~->>'.< > Page 1 of 1 212312009 12:56 PM ES-401, REV 9 SRO T2G2 PWR EXAMINATION OUTLINE KA NAME / SAFETY FUNCTION: IR K1 K2 K3 K4 K5 K6 A 1 A2 A3 A4 G RO SRO Liquid Radwaste 3.8 4.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ~ FORM ES-401-2 TOPIC: Ability to explain and apply all system limits and precautions. - ------- ---:-----:---------::-----,-----::-:c ___ ---=------=~:__--_::_-_::_-------------- Waste Gas Disposal 2.4 2.5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ~ 0 0 0 Supply failure to the isolation valve Station Air 2.9 3.2 0 0 0 0 0 0 U ~ 0 0 0 ~:.*;Cross-connectlon with lAS ~~->>'.< > Page 1 of 1 212312009 12:56 PM

ES-401, REV 9 KA NAME / SAFETY FUNCTION: Conduct of operations I-.~/ SRO T3 PWR EXAMINATION OUTLINE IR K1 K2 K3 K4 K5 K6 A 1 A2 A3 A4 G RO SRO 4.3 4.3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ~ FORM ES-401-2 TOPIC: Ability to identify and interpret diverse indications to validate the response of another indication 6 ,~ ')2.1.45 ~~~--~~--~~--~----------~~~~~-=~~~~~-=~~~~-=~~~~~-; G., .. G2.2.39 Equipment Control 3.9 4.5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ~ Knowledge of less than one hour technical specification action statements for systems.

/ \\ '-;.

G2.2.5 Equipment Control 2.2 3.2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ~ Knowledge of the process for making design or operating changes to the facility G2.3.15 Radiation Control 2.9 3.1 n n n n nOD 0 0 0 ~ Emergency Procedures/Plans 3.4 3.9 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ~ Knowledge of "fire in the planr procedures. Page 1 of 1 2/2312009 12:56 PM 4 ES-401, REV 9 KA NAME / SAFETY FUNCTION: Conduct of operations I-.~/ SRO T3 PWR EXAMINATION OUTLINE IR K1 K2 K3 K4 K5 K6 A 1 A2 A3 A4 G RO SRO 4.3 4.3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ~ FORM ES-401-2 TOPIC: Ability to identify and interpret diverse indications to validate the response of another indication 6 ,~ ')2.1.45

~-------

a ',.I...... ;} .. G2.2.3_9 ______ E_ q u __ i_ p m_e_n_t_Con __ t_ro_I _______________ 3_.9 __ 4_._5 __ D ___ D ___ D __ D ___ D ___ D __ D ___ D ___ D __ D ___ ~ K_nO_w_led_g_e_O_f_le_ss __ th_a_n_o_ne __ ho_u_r_te_C_hn_i_ca_l_s_pe_C_if_ic_at_io_n ___ D action statements for systems. G2.2.5 Equipment Control 2.2 3.2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ~ Knowledge of the process for making design or operating changes to the facility

~-----------------------------=~~--~~~--~~=-~~----~------~--~-----------------------

Radiation Control 2.9 3.1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ~ Knowledge of radiation monitoring systems G2.3.15 ~--------------------------------- ~~2'~3~'5~ ____ ~R_ad_ia_t_io_n_c~0~n_trO_I~ __ ~ ________ ~2~'9 __ 2~.~9 __ [J 0 0 0 ~D=-D~~D~~D=-D~~D~~~=-___ A~b_il_ity~ro~u_s_e~rn_d_ia_li_on~m~o~n~ito~r_in_g~s_ys=te~m=s __________ __ g'4.,4 Em"9"""P'OC"',,<"IPOM 3.8 4.5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0., K","'d9'oIgen'ffilgu.'Ii~f",EOP""ge. ~--~----~------=---~~--------------~------------------------------------------~----~------------------------ ~ G2.4.27 Emergency Procedures/Plans 3.4 3.9 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ~ Knowledge of "fire in the planr procedures. Page 1 of 1 2/2312009 12:56 PM

ES-401 Record of Rejected KlAs Form ES-401-4 Tier I Randomly Reason for Rejection Grour:> Selected KIA TlGl 009EG2.2.3 Not applicable due to plant design TlG2 003AK3.03 Not applicable due to plant design T2Gl 006A3.08 Not applicable due to plant design T2G2 068A3.01 Not applicable due to plant design T2GI 003A3.02 Not applicable due to plant design ES-401 Record of Rejected KlAs Form ES-401-4 Tier I Randomly Reason for Rejection Group Selected KIA TlGl 009EG2.2.3 Not applicable due to plant design TlG2 003AK3.03 Not applicable due to plant design T2Gl 006A3.08 Not applicable due to plant design T2G2 068A3.01 Not applicable due to plant design T2GI 003A3.02 Not applicable due to plant design

ES-201 Examination Outline Quality Checklist Form ES-201-2 hna J Facility: Turkey Point Units 3 & 4 Date of Examination: September 2009 Initials Item Task Description a b*,. C#

1.

a.

Verify that the outline(s) frt(s) the appropriate model, in accordance with ES-401. ~ ~ £;1. w

b. Assess whether the outline was systematically and randomly prepared in accordance with

~ R Section 0.1 of ES-401 and whether all KIA categories are appropriately sampled. l-If-;t I Iv Y ~.i T

c. Assess whether the outline over-emphasizes any systems, evolutions, or generic topics.

T

d. Assess whether the justifications for deselected or rejected KIA statements are appropriate.

-{J E ~ lti N

2.

a.

Using Form ES-301-5, verify that the proposed scenario sets cover the required number 1+ "'id~ of normal evolutions, instrument and component failures, technical specifications, Ie-S and major transients. I

b.

Assess whether there are enough scenario sets (and spares) to test the projected number M and mix of applicants in accordance with the expected crew composition and rotation schedule U without compromising exam integrity, and ensure that each applicant can be tested using f.- l-f L at least one new or Significantly modified scenario, that no scenarios are duplicated A from the applicants' audit test(s), and that scenarios will not be repeated on subsequent days. T 0

c.

To the extent possible, assess whether the outline(s) conform(s) with the qualitative k- -f R and quantitative criteria specified on Form ES-301-4 and described in Appendix D.

3.

a. Verify that the systems walk-through outline meets the criteria specified on Form ES-301-2:

(1 ) the outline(s) contain(s) the required number of control room and in-plant tasks W distributed among the safety functions as specified on the form 1 (2) task repetition from the last two NRC examinations is within the limits specified on the form T (3) no tasks are duplicated from the applicants' audit test(s) ~ -fY (4) the number of new or modified tasks meets or exceeds the minimums specified on the form (5) the number of alternate path, low-power, emergency, and RCA tasks meet the criteria on the form.

b. Verify that the administrative outline meets the criteria specified on Form ES-301-1:

(1 ) the tasks are distributed among the topics as specified on the form ~ (2) at least one task is new or significantly modified ltV' V Q2 no more than one task is repeated from the last two NRC licensing examinations

c.

Determine if there are enough different outlines to test the projected number and mix jI\\/ ~ -1;j. of applicants and ensure that no items are duplicated on subsequent days.

4.

a.

Assess whether plant-specific priorities (including PRA and IPE insights) are covered It-- -,c.J.;f. in the appropriate exam sections. G

b. Assess whether the 10 CFR 55.41/43 and 55.45 sampling is appropriate.

It- ~ .£1-E Ensure that KIA importance ratings (except for plant-specific priorities) are at least 2.5. Iv ¥ ~.;l N

c.

E

d. Check for duplication and overlap among exam sections.

IIr y lecf R

e. Check the entire exam for balance of coverage.

/v ~ L2 A L

f.

Assess whether the exam fits the appropriate job level (RO or SRO). ~ ~ id;l. 5Ln u/tIJ;rinte0L6~u~~7/ ~

a. Author

~. 1,.

b. Facility Reviewer (*)

I \\ AMeS (~k--/ p I'~ Jc? )o-~. =

c. NRC Chief Examiner (#)

£d~Jn ~ ~ ~.Jr. //:,.../., )....,.) £.£.&, U.

d. NRC Supervisor LlAUI'J{LA~r.~{)J~/1 / II\\. /.//

/ JllJliuu~ Note:

Independent NRC reviewer initial items in Column "c n

chief examiner concurrence required.

Not applicable for NRC-prepared examination outlines Rc"'/~w l.J

'-0 II a,1 p c...-J (),,-,., <<.ct J............ Qpe...... -.l..... Lest ES-201 Examination Outline Quality Checklist Form ES-201-2 hna., Facility: Turkey Point Units 3 & 4 Date of Examination: September 2009 Initials Item Task Description a b*/, C#

1.

a.

Verify that the outline(s) frt(s) the appropriate model, in accordance with ES-401. ~ I~ L:f. w

b. Assess whether the outline was systematically and randomly prepared in accordance with I~

'r~ R Section 0.1 of ES-401 and whether all KIA categories are appropriately sampled. l_ I Iv I-f? L£ T

c. Assess whether the outline over-emphasizes any systems, evolutions, or generic topics.

T

d. Assess whether the justifications for deselected or rejected KIA statements are appropriate.

-{J E ~ L.i N

2.

a.

Using Form ES-301-5, verify that the proposed scenario sets cover the required number 1+....!d? of normal evolutions, instrument and component failures, technical specifications, Ie-S and major transients. I

b.

Assess whether there are enough scenario sets (and spares) to test the projected number M and mix of applicants in accordance with the expected crew composition and rotation schedule ) U without compromising exam integrity, and ensure that each applicant can be tested using f.- l-f L at least one new or Significantly modified scenario, that no scenarios are duplicated A from the applicants' audit test(s), and that scenarios will not be repeated on subsequent days. T 0

c.

To the extent possible, assess whether the outline(s) conform(s) with the qualitative k- -f R and quantitative criteria specified on Form ES-301-4 and described in Appendix D.

3.

a. Verify that the systems walk-through outline meets the criteria specified on Form ES-301-2:

(1 ) the outline(s) contain(s) the required number of control room and in-plant tasks W distributed among the safety functions as specified on the form 1 (2) task repetition from the last two NRC examinations is within the limits specified on the form T (3) no tasks are duplicated from the applicants' audit test(s) ~ -fY (4) the number of new or modified tasks meets or exceeds the minimums specified on the form (5) the number of alternate path, low-power, emergency, and RCA tasks meet the criteria on the form.

b. Verify that the administrative outline meets the criteria specified on Form ES-301-1:

(1 ) the tasks are distributed among the topics as specified on the form ~ (2) at least one task is new or significantly modified ltV' l! (3) no more than one task is repeated from the last two NRC licensing examinations

c.

Determine if there are enough different outlines to test the projected number and mix jI\\/ :£ -1;j. of applicants and ensure that no items are duQlicated on subsequent days.

4.

a.

Assess whether plant-specific priorities (including PRA and IPE insights) are covered It-- -,c.J.;f. in the appropriate exam sections. G

b. Assess whether the 10 CFR 55.41/43 and 55.45 sampling is appropriate.

It- ~ .l1-E Ensure that KIA importance ratings (except for plant-specific priorities) are at least 2.5. Iv r ld.L N

c.

E

d. Check for duplication and overlap among exam sections.

l!r y ~J R

e. Check the entire exam for balance of coverage.

/v I~ L2 A L

f.

Assess whether the exam fits the appropriate job level (RO or SRO). ~ I~ ~J.- /f/n wtll;rinte~Y6~u~h ~

a. Author

~. 1 ~

b. Facility Reviewer (*)

'\\ AMe~ (~M Y 'L:::: F ....... ).- ~ ~7

c. NRC Chief Examiner (#)

£k,n ~ ~ ~.Jr. /...cd'... J.-.j ~ U.

d. NRC Supervisor LlAUI'JIL.l.. r:JtnAA.A.IAI / /i\\ /.//

/ )f/Jiiuijfr:1LLf[--' Note:

Independent NRC reviewer initial items in Column "c n

chief examiner concurrence required.

Not applicable for NRC-prepared examination outlines

ES-401 Written Examination Quality Checklist Form ES-401-6 Exam Level: RO X SRO X Item Descri tion

1.

Questions and answers are technicall accurate and a licable to the facili

2.

a.

b.

3.

SRO NRC KlAs are referenced for all questions. Facili learn in ob'ectives are referenced as available.

4.

The sampling process was random and systematic (If more than 4 RO or 2 SRO questions were re eated from the last 2 NRC licensin exams, consult the NRR OL ro ram office.

5.

6.

7.

Question duplication from the license screening/audit exam was controlled as indicated below (check the item that applies) and appears appropriate: _ the audit exam was systematically and randomly developed; or _ the audit exam was completed before the license exam was started; or _ the examinations were developed independently; or ..:::... the licensee certifies that there is no duplication; or _ other (explain) Bank use meets limits (no more than 75 percent from the bank, at least 10 percent new, and the rest new or modified); enter the actual RO / SRO-only Bank Modified New uestion distribution s at ri ht. Memory CIA Between 50 and 60 percent of the questions on the RO exam are written at the comprehension/ analysis level; the SRO exam may exceed 60 percent if the randomly selected KlAs support the higher cognitive levels; enter the actual RO / SRO uestion distribution s at ri ht. 5/ / it Wi 14

8.

References/handouts provided do not give away answers or aid in the elimination of distractors.

9.

Question content conforms with specific KIA statements in the previously approved examination outline and is appropriate for the tier to which they are assigned; deviations are *ustified.

10.

11.

The exam contains the required number of one-point, multiple choice items; the total is correct and a rees with the value on the cover sheet.

a. Author

b. Facility Reviewer (*)

c. NRC Chief Examiner (#)

d. NRC Regional Supervisor Note:

The facility reviewers initials/signature are not applicable for NRC-developed examinations.

Inde endent NRC reviewer initial items in Column *c n

chief examiner concurrence re uired.

Initial ES-401 Written Examination Quality Checklist Form ES-401-6 ~ v~ Date of Exam: September 2009 Exam Level: RO X SROX Initial Item Description a b*.r. c*

1.

Questions and answers are technically accurate and applicable to the facility. .~p(. ~ ~'"

2.

a.

NRC KlAs are referenced for all questions. /ltv£-.jJ £2

b.

Facility learning objectives are referenced as available.

3.

SRO questions are appropriate in accordance with Section D.2.d of ES-401 l~..p ll-L

4.

The sampling process was random and systematic (If more than 4 RO or 2 SRO questions ~ fJ ~J-were repeated from the last 2 NRC licensing exams, consult the NRR OL program office).

5.

Question duplication from the license screening/audit exam was controlled as indicated below (check the item that applies) and appears appropriate: _ the audit exam was systematically and randomly developed; or _ the audit exam was completed before the license exam was started; or /tv ~ a _ the examinations were developed independently; or ..:::... the licensee certifies that there is no duplication; or _ other (explain)

6.

Bank use meets limits (no more than 75 percent Bank Modified New I+J from the bank, at least 10 percent new, and the rest Si' t/ 0/0 1t1zJ IV-new or modified); enter the actual RO / SRO-only -eJ question distribution(s) at right.

7.

Between 50 and 60 percent of the questions on the RO Memory CIA exam are written at the comprehension/ analysis level; -I the SRO exam may exceed 60 percent if the randomly 5/ /ft Wi 14 ~.cd selected KlAs support the higher cognitive levels; enter the actual RO / SRO question distribution(s) at right.

8.

References/handouts provided do not give away answers ~ -;P ~..t or aid in the elimination of distractors.

9.

Question content conforms with specific KIA statements in the previously approved examination outline and is appropriate for the tier to which they are assigned; ~ Lf-deviations are justified.

10.

Question psychometric quality and format meet the guidelines in ES Appendix B. t"- f ~,;l

11.

The exam contains the required number of one-point, multiple choice items; Jtr ~ '4;d the total is correct and agrees with the value on the cover sheet. 1ft Print;:',az/ Sit~ ,£;r i~

a. Author f?" IA J I~./

/J-*..a/ A. ""'1"7 7

b. Facility Reviewer (*)

.-=.1 A fYI" 'i. ('lSYld-A-' /:::.,L/ P L ~

c. NRC Chief Examiner (#)

£cI"",r> i..J e.i..-iE-. / /~/J.6 ~~. A..... / J

d. NRC Regional Supervisor IJAlN'JLI.-r. \\lJtnJJutAl1 A.-:-J /

':;7 / /!JIJti.jJ'4(1' 1 '-.../ Note:

The facility reviewers initials/signature are not applicable for NRC-developed examinations.

Independent NRC reviewer initial items in Column *c n

chief examiner concurrence required.

ES-403, Rev. 9 Written Examination Grading Quality Checklist I~acility: Turkey Point Date of Exam: 09/16/09 Item Description

1.

Clean answer sheets copied before grading

2.

Answer key changes and question deletions justified and documented

3.

Applicants' scores checked for addition errors (reviewers spot check> 25% of examinations)

4.

Grading for all borderline cases (80 +/-2% overall and 70 or 80, as applicable, +/-4% on the SRO-only) reviewed in detail

5.

All other failing examinations checked to ensure that grades are justified

6.

Performance on missed questions checked for training deficiencies and wording problems; evaluate validity of questions missed by half or more of the applicants Printed Name/Signature Form ES-403-1 Exam Level(ffc5}SRO) Initials a b c RSB NA Lt RSB LL RSB LL RSB Lot RSB Lc£ RSB ~ Lei Date

a. Grader Richard S. Baldwin/~.~ 09/30109

b. Facility Reviewer(*)

NA

c. NRC Chief Examiner (*)

Edwin Leal./ rL_.k.... ~-- 0J. ~L!a/l?9 lilJ'" / lit

d. NRC Supervisor (*)

Malcolm T. Widman 'lilJJb:C ('/J/ -; () / til --~ \\\\~ J (*) The facility reviewer's signature is not applicable for examinations graded by the NRC; two independent NRC reviews are required. ES-403, Rev. 9 Written Examination Grading Quality Checklist Form ES-403-1 I~lity: Turkey Point Date of Exam: 09/16/09 ExamLevel~ Item Description a

1.

Clean answer sheets copied before grading RSB

2.

Answer key changes and question deletions justified and RSB documented

3.

Applicants' scores checked for addition errors RSB (reviewers spot check> 25% of examinations)

4.

Grading for all borderline cases (80 +/-2% overall and 70 or 80, RSB as applicable, +/-4% on the SRO-only) reviewed in detail

5.

All other failing examinations checked to ensure that grades RSB are justified

6.

Performance on missed questions checked for training RSB deficiencies and wording problems; evaluate validity of questions missed by half or more of the applicants Printed Name/Signature

a. Grader Richard S. Baldwin/~.~

b. Facility Reviewer(*)

NA

c. NRC Chief Examiner (*)

Edwin Leal/rI-J.,~' & t21.

d. NRC Supervisor (*)

{,,~ ~( Malcolm T. WidmannWLlJJ~V 1}(-------~ \\ \\~ ) Initials b c NA ct LL £L 2L Lc£ ~ Lei Date 09/30109 ~/3'all?9 ('/J/ -; () / til (*) The facility reviewer's signature is not applicable for examinations graded by the NRC; two independent NRC reviews are required.

ES-401 Written Examination Review Worksheet -- Vogtle SRO Form ES-401-9

1.

2.

3. Psychometric Flaws

4. Job Content Flaws

5. Other

6.

7.

8.

Q# LOK LOD (F/H) (1-5) Stem Cues T/F Credo Partial Job-Minutia

1 Back-Q=

SRO B/MIN U/E/S Explanation Focus Dist. Link units ward KIA Only Instructions [Refer to Section 0 of ES-401 and Appendix B for additional information regarding each of the following concepts.]

1.

Enter the level of knowledge (LOK) of each question as either (F)undamental or (H)igher cognitive level.

2.

Enter the level of difficulty (LOD) of each question using a 1 - 5 (easy - difficult) rating scale (questions in the 2 - 4 range are acceptable).

3.

Check the appropriate box if a psychometric flaw is identified: The stem lacks sufficient focus to elicit the correct answer (e.g., unclear intent, more information is needed, or too much needless information). The stem or distractors contain cues (i.e., clues, specific determiners, phrasing, length, etc). The answer choices are a collection of unrelated true/false statements. The distractors are not credible; single implausible distractors should be repaired, more than one is unacceptable. One or more distractors is (are) partially correct (e.g., if the applicant can make unstated assumptions that are not contradicted by stem).

4.

Check the appropriate box if a job content error is identified: The question is not linked to the job requirements (i.e., the question has a valid KIA but, as written, is not operational in content). The question requires the recall of knowledge that is too specific for the closed reference test mode (i.e., it is not required to be known from memory). The question contains data with an unrealistic level of accuracy or inconsistent units (e.g., panel meter in percent with question in gallons). The question requires reverse logic or application compared to the job requirements.

5.

Check questions that are sampled for conformance with the approved KIA and those that are designated SRO-only (KIA and license level mismatches are unacceptable).

6.

Enter question source: (B)ank, (M)odified, or (N)ew. Check that (M)odified questions meet criteria of ES-401 Section D.2.f.

7.

Based on the reviewer'S judgment, is the question as written (U)nsatisfactory (requiring repair or replacement), in need of (E)ditorial enhancement, or (S)atisfactory?

8.

At a minimum, explain any "U" ratings (e.g., how the Appendix B psychometric attributes are not being met).

1.

2.

3. Psychometric Flaws

4. Job Content Flaws

5. Other

6.

7.

8.

Q# LOK LOD (F/H) (1-5) Stem Cues T/F Credo Partial Job-Minutia

1 Back-Q=

SRO B/M/N U/E/S Explanation Focus Dist. Link units ward KIA Only 1 H 3 X N U Does not meet the KIA. The effect of an open PORV on code safety valves is not addressed. WROTE NEW QUESTION (OK) 2 H 2 X N E/S Consider rewording the stem: For the given plant conditions, which one of the following describes RCP operation in accordance with...... and the reasons.. Ask the question more directly, e.g. RE WORDED QUESTION (OK) ~ ES-401 Written Examination Review Worksheet -- Vogtle SRO Form ES-401-9

1.

2.

3. Psychometric Flaws

4. Job Content Flaws

5. Other

6.

7.

8.

Q# LOK LOD (F/H) (1-5) Stem Cues T/F Credo Partial Job-Minutia

1 Back-Q=

SRO B/MIN U/E/S Explanation Focus Dist. Link units ward KIA Only Instructions [Refer to Section 0 of ES-401 and Appendix B for additional information regarding each of the following concepts.]

1.

Enter the level of knowledge (LOK) of each question as either (F)undamental or (H)igher cognitive level.

2.

Enter the level of difficulty (LOD) of each question using a 1 - 5 (easy - difficult) rating scale (questions in the 2 - 4 range are acceptable).

3.

Check the appropriate box if a psychometric flaw is identified: The stem lacks sufficient focus to elicit the correct answer (e.g., unclear intent, more information is needed, or too much needless information). The stem or distractors contain cues (i.e., clues, specific determiners, phrasing, length, etc). The answer choices are a collection of unrelated true/false statements. The distractors are not credible; single implausible distractors should be repaired, more than one is unacceptable. One or more distractors is (are) partially correct (e.g., if the applicant can make unstated assumptions that are not contradicted by stem).

4.

Check the appropriate box if a job content error is identified: The question is not linked to the job requirements (i.e., the question has a valid KIA but, as written, is not operational in content). The question requires the recall of knowledge that is too specific for the closed reference test mode (i.e., it is not required to be known from memory). The question contains data with an unrealistic level of accuracy or inconsistent units (e.g., panel meter in percent with question in gallons). The question requires reverse logic or application compared to the job requirements.

5.

Check questions that are sampled for conformance with the approved KIA and those that are designated SRO-only (KIA and license level mismatches are unacceptable).

6.

Enter question source: (B)ank, (M)odified, or (N)ew. Check that (M)odified questions meet criteria of ES-401 Section D.2.f.

7.

Based on the reviewer'S judgment, is the question as written (U)nsatisfactory (requiring repair or replacement), in need of (E)ditorial enhancement, or (S)atisfactory?

8.

At a minimum, explain any "U" ratings (e.g., how the Appendix B psychometric attributes are not being met).

1.

2.

3. Psychometric Flaws

4. Job Content Flaws

5. Other

6.

7.

8.

Q# LOK LOD (F/H) (1-5) Stem Cues T/F Credo Partial Job-Minutia

1 Back-Q=

SRO B/M/N U/E/S Explanation Focus Dist. Link units ward KIA Only 1 H 3 X N U Does not T" Mr.,." valves is not addressed. WROTE NEW QUESTION (OK) 2 H 2 X N E/S Consider rewording the stem: For the given plant conditions, which one of the following describes RCP operation in accordance with...... and the reasons.. Ask the question more directly, e.g. RE WORDED QUESTION (OK)

1.

2.

3. Psychometric Flaws

4. Job Content Flaws

5. Other

6.

7.

8.

Q# LOK LOD (F/H) (1-5) Stem Cues T/F Credo Partial Job-Minutia

1 Back-Q=

SRO B/M/N U/EIS Explanation Focus Dis!. Link units ward KIA Only 3 H 1 X N E LOD. Consider rewording the stem to ask the applicant to identify the path first and then the procedure which the crew should transition to. REVISED THE STEM (OK) 4 H 2 X X N E Consider asking the question and stating the answers more directly and rewording the distractors:: Which one of the following statements correctly describes how the plant will respond and the reason a reactor trip is necessary for the given plant conditions? (OK) The plant will trip automatically in order to maintain Departure From Nucleate Boiling Ratio (DNBR) within acceptable limits. The plant will NOT trip automatically. The plant must be manually tripped in order to maintain linear power density (kw/ft) within acceptable limits..... 5 H 3 X X N U Unsatisfactory due to multiple correct answers. Distractor A appears to be potentially correct. Remove most likely from the stem.. Distractor B appears to be implausible. CHANGED DISTRACTORS (OK) 6 H 2 X X ?IElU Should power history be provided? Could there be more than one correct answer? How does applicant convert 5 days to MWD/MTU? (OK) 7 F 2 S (OK) 8 H 1 X E LOD. Implausible distractors - pressure controller output failures only have two responses - - energize heaters or spray actuation. How could liquid temperature increase and vapor space temperature decrease? CHANGED WORDING IN THE STEM TO: WITHIN THE FIRST MINUTE. (OK). 9 H 2 E Stem need to be reworded to ask the question such that the stem supports what is provided in the stem. Consider the following: The crew will dump steam to the and depressurize the RCS using . REVISED QUESTION AS SUGGESTED (OK) 10 H 2 X U There may be two correct answers (C & D) Need to address the concem of what happens to S/G pressure over time. ADDED INFORMATION TO THE STEM AND CHANGED WORDING IN DISTRACTORS (OK)

1.

2.

3. Psychometric Flaws

4. Job Content Flaws

5. Other

6.

7.

8.

Q# LOK LOD (F/H) (1-5) Stem Cues T/F Credo Partial Job-Minutia

1 Back-Q=

SRO B/M/N U/EIS Explanation Focus Dis!. Link units ward KIA Only 3 H 1 X N E LOD. Consider rewording the stem to ask the applicant to identify the path first and then the procedure which the crew should transition to. REVISED THE STEM (OK) 4 H 2 X X N E Consider asking the question and stating the answers more directly and rewording the distractors:: Which one of the following statements correctly describes how the plant will respond and the reason a reactor trip is necessary for the given plant conditions? (OK) The plant will trip automatically in order to maintain Departure From Nucleate Boiling Ratio (DNBR) within acceptable limits. The plant will NOT trip automatically. The plant must be manually tripped in order to maintain linear power density (kw/ft) within acceptable limits..... 5 H 3 X X N U Unsatisfactory due to multiple correct answers. Distractor A appears to be potentially correct. Remove most likely from the stem.. Distractor B appears to be implausible. CHANGED DISTRACTORS (OK) 6 H 2 X X ?IElU Should power history be provided? Could there be more than one correct answer? How does applicant convert 5 days to MWD/MTU? (OK)

7 F

2 S (OK) 8 H 1 X E LOD. Implausible distractors - pressure controller output failures only have two responses - - energize heaters or spray actuation. How could liquid temperature increase and vapor space temperature decrease? CHANGED WORDING IN THE STEM TO: WITHIN THE FIRST MINUTE. (OK). 9 H 2 E Stem need to be reworded to ask the question such that the stem supports what is provided in the stem. Consider the following: The crew will dump steam to the and depressurize the RCS using . REVISED QUESTION AS SUGGESTED (OK) 10 H 2 X U There may be two correct answers (C & D) Need to address the concem of what happens to S/G pressure over time. ADDED INFORMATION TO THE STEM AND CHANGED WORDING IN DISTRACTORS (OK)

1.

2.

3. Psychometric Flaws

4. Job Content Flaws

5. Other

6.

7.

8.

Q# LOK LOD (F/H) (1-5) Stem Cues T/F Crecl. Partial Job-Minutia

/

Back-Q= SRO B/M/N U/E/S Explanation Focus Dist. Link units ward KIA Only 11 F 2 S (OK) 12 F 3 S (OK) 13 H 3 S (OK) 14 F 2 S (OK) 15 H ? X U Question worded poorly and does not appear to match KIA. REWROTE QUESTION (OK) 16 F 2 S (OK) 17 F 2 S (OK) 18 H 2 X X E Ensure that stem and distractors match. Possible implausible distractors - need basis for 130gpm being plausible. It is not a number from procedure. REWROTE QUESTION (OK) 19 F 2 X X U Stem states that the crew completes the required procedure. Completion of procedure implies that rod alignment was verified as subsequent procedure steps require. Not plausible for pulser or slave cylinder failure signals to be caused by improper rod height. Need explanation why correct answer is correct. Why one rod being LOWER would cause rod demand past ARO position? WROTE NEW QUESTION. MAKE SURE THERE IS NO OVERLAP BETWEEN OTHER SECTIONS OF EXAM (OK) 20 F 2 S (OK) 21 H 3 U Not sure if this is an RO question. 0 is not plausible. Work sheet states that no reference is provided. WROTE NEW QUESTION (Ok) 22 H 3 S (OK) 23 H 3 S (OK) ~-

1.

2.

3. Psychometric Flaws

4. Job Content Flaws

5. Other

6.

7.

8.

Q# LOK LOD (F/H) (1-5) Stem Cues T/F Crecl. Partial Job-Minutia

/

Back-Q= SRO B/M/N U/E/S Explanation Focus Dist. Link units ward KIA Only 11 F 2 S (OK) 12 F 3 S (OK) 13 H 3 S (OK) 14 F 2 S (OK) 15 H ? X U Question worded poorly and does not appear to match KIA. REWROTE QUESTION (OK) I 16 F 2 S (OK) 17 F 2 S (OK) 18 H 2 X X E Ensure that stem and distractors match. Possible implausible distractors - need basis for 130gpm being plausible. It is not a number from procedure. REWROTE QUESTION (OK) 19 F 2 X X U Stem states that the crew completes the required procedure. Completion of procedure implies that rod alignment was verified as subsequent procedure steps require. Not plausible for pulser or slave cylinder failure signals to be caused by improper rod height. Need explanation why correct answer is correct. Why one rod being LOWER would cause rod demand past ARO position? WROTE NEW QUESTION. MAKE SURE THERE IS NO OVERLAP BETWEEN OTHER SECTIONS OF EXAM (OK) 20 F 2 S (OK) 21 H 3 U Not sure if this is an RO question. 0 is not plausible. Work sheet states that no reference is provided. WROTE NEW QUESTION (Ok) 22 H 3 S (OK) 23 H 3 S (OK)

1.

2.

3. Psychometric Flaws

4. Job Content Flaws

5. Other

6.

7.

8.

Q# LOK LOD (F/H) (1-5) Stem Cues T/F Credo Partial Job-Minutia

1 Back-Q=

SRO B/M/N U/EIS Explanation Focus Dist. Link units ward KIA Only 24 F 2 E The correct answer is the only one that contains "Trip the reactor" action. Would recommend adding this action to at least one other set of actions to provide additional distraction REWORDED DISTRACTORS (OK) 25 H 3 X S/E Change "operability" to "indication" to align with wording of choices. MADE CHANGES (OK) 26 H 2 E Distractor B (100 psid steam line signal) is not plausible. CHANGED DISTRACTOR B (OK) 27 F 2 s (OK) 28 F 1 X U Question failed to address automatic operation of RCPs REPLACED KIA AND WROTE NEW QUESTION (OK) 29 H 2 X E Distractor A is not plausible. REWORDED STEM AND DISTRACTORS (OK) 30 H 2 ElS Unable to locate procedural guidance to support answer as the question is written. REWORDED DISTRACTORS (OK) 31 H 2 S (OK) 32 F 2 S (OK) 33 F 2 S DETERMINED QUESTION WAS NOT RO AND MODIFIED QUESTION. (OK) 34 H 3 E Reword the stem to ask what is given in the answer and distractors. The stem ask what actions are required by TS and distractors discuss mode change. MADE CHANGES TO STEM AND DISTRACTORS BAND STT 35 F 2 S (OK 36 F 2 S (OK) 37 F 2 S (OK) 38 H 3 S (OK) 39 H 3 X E Distractor B is not plausible. Nothing within the stem of the question would provide any indication that an ATWS has occurred. CHANGED DISTRACTORS (OK) 40 F 2 S REWORDED STEM (OK)

1.

2.

3. Psychometric Flaws

4. Job Content Flaws

5. Other

6.

7.

8.

Q# LOK LOD (F/H) (1-5) Stem Cues T/F Credo Partial Job-Minutia

1 Back-Q=

SRO B/M/N U/EIS Explanation Focus Dist. Link units ward KIA Only 24 F 2 E The correct answer is the only one that contains "Trip the reactor" action. Would recommend adding this action to at least one other set of actions to provide additional distraction REWORDED DISTRACTORS (OK) 25 H 3 X S/E Change "operability" to "indication" to align with wording of choices. MADE CHANGES (OK) 26 H 2 E Distractor B (100 psid steam line signal) is not plausible. CHANGED DISTRACTOR B (OK) 27 F 2 s (OK) 28 F 1 X U Question failed to address automatic operation of RCPs REPLACED KIA AND WROTE NEW QUESTION (OK) 29 H 2 X E Distractor A is not plausible. REWORDED STEM AND DISTRACTORS (OK) 30 H 2 ElS Unable to locate procedural guidance to support answer as the question is written. REWORDED DISTRACTORS (OK) G H 2 S (OK) F 2 S (OK) I 33 F ~ S DETERMINED QUESTION WAS NOT RO AND MODIFIED QUESTION. (OK) 34 H 3 E Reword the stem to ask what is given in the answer and distractors. The stem ask what actions are required by TS and distractors discuss mode change. MADE CHANGES TO STEM AND DISTRACTORS BAND STT 35 F 2 S (OK 36 F 2 S (OK) 37 F 2 S (OK) 38 H 3 S (OK) 39 H 3 X E Distractor B is not plausible. Nothing within the stem of the question would provide any indication that an ATWS has occurred. CHANGED DISTRACTORS (OK) 40 F 2 S REWORDED STEM (OK)

1.

2.

3. Psychometric Flaws

4. Job Content Flaws

5. Other

6.

7.

8.

Q# LOK LOD (F/H) (1-5) Stem Cues T/F Credo Partial Job-Minutia

1 Back-Q=

SRO B/M/N U/E/S Explanation Focus Dist. Link units ward KIA Only 41 H 4 S? Is this and RO only question? RO WILL PERFORM THE ATTACHMENT. IS AN SRO ACTION LICENSEE CONSIDER THIS AN RO QUESTION (OK) 42 H 3 S ADDED MINOR INFORMATION TO THE STEM. (OK) 43 F 2 X E distractor C is not plausible. Explain why one would think that valves will open when a pump fail to start. CONCLUDED THAT QUESTION WAS OK. DISTAACTORS BASED ON SI NOT BEING RESET. (OK) 44 H 3 E Consider revising information provided in the stem. Describe initial condition and subsequent conditions. MADE CHANGES AS REQUESTED (OK) 45 H 4 E Need to add the word "level" to 3A SG in 2nd bullet. REWORDED SEVERAL OF THE DISTRACTORS (OK) 46 H 2 S (OK) 47 H 3 S (OK) 48 H 3 S (OK) 49 H 3 S (OK) 50 F 2 S (OK) 51 H 3 X E Distractor B is not plausible. If a tank cannot be filled, would the EDG be considered operable INFORMATION PROVIDED IN LESSON PLAN INDICATES THAT A DG IS INOPERABLE WHEN A FUEL TRANSFER PUMP IS INOPERABLE. QUESTION IS OK. 52 F 1 X U LOD. Distractors A and B do not appear to be plausible. For the I given conditions CPM is not plausible. LICENSEE CONVENSED/EXPLAINED DIFFERENCE IN CRUD AND FISSION PRODUCT (OK) 53 H 2 S (OK) 54 F 2 S (OK) 55 F 1 U LOD. THIS IS A ONE HOUR TS REQUIREMENT. DECIDED TO USEE QUESTION (OK)

1.

2.

3. Psychometric Flaws

4. Job Content Flaws

5. Other

6.

7.

8.

Q# LOK LOD (F/H) (1-5) Stem Cues T/F Credo Partial Job-Minutia

1 Back-Q=

SRO B/M/N U/E/S Explanation Focus Dist. Link units ward KIA Only 41 H 4 S? Is this and RO only question? RO WILL PERFORM THE ATTACHMENT. IS AN SRO ACTION LICENSEE CONSIDER THIS AN RO QUESTION (OK) 42 H 3 S ADDED MINOR INFORMATION TO THE STEM. (OK) 43 F 2 X E distractor C is not plausible. Explain why one would think that valves will open when a pump fail to start. CONCLUDED THAT QUESTION WAS OK. DISTAACTORS BASED ON SI NOT BEING RESET. (OK) 44 H 3 E Consider revising information provided in the stem. Describe initial condition and subsequent conditions. MADE CHANGES AS REQUESTED (OK) 45 H 4 E Need to add the word "level" to 3A SG in 2nd bullet. REWORDED SEVERAL OF THE DISTRACTORS (OK) 46 H 2 S (OK) 47 H 3 S (OK) 48 H 3 S (OK) 49 H 3 S (OK) 50 F 2 S (OK) 51 H 3 X E Distractor B is not plausible. If a tank cannot be filled, would the EDG be considered operable INFORMATION PROVIDED IN LESSON PLAN INDICATES THAT A DG IS INOPERABLE WHEN A FUEL TRANSFER PUMP IS INOPERABLE. QUESTION IS OK. 52 F 1 X U LOD. Distractors A and B do not appear to be plausible. For the given conditions CPM is not plausible. LICENSEE CONVENSED/EXPLAINED DIFFERENCE IN CRUD AND FISSION PRODUCT (OK) r;t7 2 S (OK) 2 S (OK) 55 F 1 U LOD. THIS IS A ONE HOUR TS REQUIREMENT. DECIDED TO USEE QUESTION (OK)

II I I I I I I I

1.

2.

3. Psychometric Flaws

4. Job Content Flaws

5. Other

6.

7.

8.

Q# LOK LOD (F/H) (1-5) Stem Cues T/F Credo Partial Job-Minutia

1 Back-Q=

SRO B/MIN U/EIS Explanation Focus Dis!. Link units ward KIA Only 56 H X ElS Explain KIA match. Consider changing one of the distractors to total flow will increase REWORDED STEM AND DISTRACTORS TO ENSURE MATCH OF KIA. (OK) 57 F 1 LOD OPERATORS ARE REQUIRED TO KNOW. DECIDED THAT THE QUESTION IS COULD BE USED. (OK) 58 F 3 E Consider changing mode and modifying distractors. Dose alarm have different levels before automatic actions occur? MADE CHANGES TO DISTRACTOR 59 H 3 U Most likely is not acceptable. Leads to the possibly more than one answers. No need to add PRMS - R-14 if it is not in alarm. Possible cueing WROTE NEW QUESTION (OK) 60 H 3 S CHANGED WORDS IN DISTRACTOR (OK) 61 H 2 S? Is it the expectation that operators should have the corresponding values for power level and Tave memorized from the Plant Curve Book? ADDED INFO TO THE STEM (OK) 62 H 2 Sf? Explain why D is plausible. Provide add'i documentation that supports Hogger operation at full power will be able to maintain the Main Condenser at 25" Hg vacuum. REPLACED WITH QUESTION FROM 2007 EXAM. (OK) 63 F 2 S (OK) 64 F 1 U LOD. What rad monitors would leave the kitchen and lavatory fans running? (OK) 65 F 3 S (OK) 66 F 2 S (OK) 67 H 3 S (OK) 68 F 3 S REVISED DISTRACTOR D (OK) 69 F 3 S (OK) 70 H 2 S (OK) 71 F 2 S CHANGED DISTRACTORS A& B. REMOVET SNPO AND ADDED CHEM TECH. (OK) 72 H 2 S CHANGED NUMBERS IN SEVERAL OF THE DISTRACTORS (OK)

1.

2.

3. Psychometric Flaws

4. Job Content Flaws

5. Other

6.

7.

8.

Q# LOK LOD (F/H) (1-5) Stem Cues T/F Credo Partial Job-Minutia

1 Back-Q=

SRO B/MIN U/EIS Explanation Focus Dis!. Link units ward KIA Only 56 H X ElS Explain KIA match. Consider changing one of the distractors to total flow will increase REWORDED STEM AND DISTRACTORS TO ENSURE MATCH OF KIA. (OK) 57 F 1 LOD OPERATORS ARE REQUIRED TO KNOW. DECIDED THAT THE QUESTION IS COULD BE USED. (OK) 58 F 3 E Consider changing mode and modifying distractors. Dose alarm have different levels before automatic actions occur? MADE CHANGES TO DISTRACTOR 59 H 3 U Most likely is not acceptable. Leads to the possibly more than one answers. No need to add PRMS - R-14 if it is not in alarm. Possible cueing WROTE NEW QUESTION (OK) 60 H 3 S CHANGED WORDS IN DISTRACTOR (OK) 61 H 2 S? Is it the expectation that operators should have the corresponding values for power level and Tave memorized from the Plant Curve Book? ADDED INFO TO THE STEM (OK) 62 H 2 Sf? Explain why D is plausible. Provide add'i documentation that supports Hogger operation at full power will be able to maintain the Main Condenser at 25" Hg vacuum. REPLACED WITH QUESTION FROM 2007 EXAM. (OK) 63 F 2 S (OK) 64 F 1 U LOD. What rad monitors would leave the kitchen and lavatory fans running? (OK) 65 F 3 S (OK) 66 F 2 S (OK) 67 H 3 S (OK) 68 F 3 S REVISED DISTRACTOR D (OK) 69 F 3 S (OK) 70 H 2 S (OK) 71 F 2 S CHANGED DISTRACTORS A& B. REMOVET SNPO AND ADDED CHEM TECH. (OK) 72 H 2 S CHANGED NUMBERS IN SEVERAL OF THE DISTRACTORS (OK)

Ia.

1.

2.

3. Psychometric Flaws

4. Job Content Flaws

5. Other

6.

7.

8.

LOK LOD (F/H) (1-5) Stem Cues T/F Credo Partial Job-Minutia

1 Back-Q= SRO B/M/N U/E/S Explanation Focus Dis!.

Link units ward KIA Only 73 F 1 U LOD WROTE NEW QUESTION (OK) 74 H 3 S (OK) 75 F 2 S (OK) 76 F 3 X X E Consider adding "minimum required emergency c/assificatiori' to the stem. Distractor A is not plausible (no classification). CHANGED WORDING IN STEM AND REMOVED NO CLASSIFICATION FROM THE DISTRACTORS. (OK) 77 H 3 X E Consider adding "minimum required emergency classification" to the stem and adding ALERT to C and B. Is a reference required for this question? CHANGED DISTRACTORS AS SUGGESTED. ADDED EMERGENCY COORDINATOR TO THE STEM.. (OK)" 78 H 2 X U May not be SRO only. What is the entry condition for the ONOP? Is the entry condition based on information that the RO should know? WROTE NEW QUESTION. (OK) 79 H 2 X N U As written it does not appear to be SRO only. Would an RO know the effect of LCV-3-11 being open and what procedure should be used to establish excessive let down. Consider asking what is the effect of the above conditions and what action should the SRO direct the crew to perform? WROTE NEW QUESTION (OK) 80 H 2 N S REVIEWED (OK) 81 H X U Not SRO only WROTE NEW QUESTIIN. (OK) 82 H U Two implausible distractors A & B MADE CHANGES TO DISTRACTORS (OK) 83 H 2 X

11.

Not SRO only. RO knowledge. Once all actions taken to address comQonent failure, RO would know that Qower increase can continue. DECIDED TO ACCEPT QUESTION AS WRITTEN. (OK) 84 H 1 X X N U May not be SRO only. Two implausible distractors CHANGED DISTRACTORS (OK) 85 F 2 N REVIEWED (OK) 86 H 3 N U Not SRO only. WROTE NEW QUESTION (OK) 87 H 3 N S REVIEWED (OK) 88 F 2 N S MINOR CHANGES 89 H 2 N S (OK)

1.

2.

3. Psychometric Flaws

4. Job Content Flaws

5. Other

6.

7.

8.

Q# LOK LOD (F/H) (1-5) Stem Cues T/F Credo Partial Job-Minutia

1 Back-Q= SRO B/M/N U/EIS Explanation Focus Dis!.

Link units ward KIA Only 73 F 1 U LOD WROTE NEW QUESTION (OK) II 74 H 3 S (OK) 75 F 2 S (OK) 76 F 3 X X E Consider adding "minimum required emergency c/assificatiori' to the stem. Distractor A is not plausible (no classification). CHANGED WORDING IN STEM AND REMOVED NO CLASSIFICATION FROM THE DISTRACTORS. (OK) 77 H 3 X E Consider adding "minimum required emergency classification" to the stem and adding ALERT to C and B. Is a reference required for this question? CHANGED DISTRACTORS AS SUGGESTED. ADDED EMERGENCY COORDINATOR TO THE STEM.. (OK)" 78 H 2 X U May not be SRO only. What is the entry condition for the ONOP? Is the entry condition based on information that the RO should know? WROTE NEW QUESTION. (OK) 79 H 2 X N U As written it does not appear to be SRO only. Would an RO know the effect of LCV-3-11 being open and what procedure should be used to establish excessive let down. Consider asking what is the effect of the above conditions and what action should the SRO direct the crew to perform? WROTE NEW QUESTION (OK) 80 H 2 N S REVIEWED (OK) 81 H X U Not SRO only WROTE NEW QUESTIIN. (OK) 82 H U Two implausible distractors A & B MADE CHANGES TO DISTRACTORS (OK) 83 H 2 X

11.

Not SRO only. RO knowledge. Once all actions taken to address comQonent failure, RO would know that Qower increase can continue. DECIDED TO ACCEPT QUESTION AS WRITTEN. (OK) 84 H 1 X X N U May not be SRO only. Two implausible distractors CHANGED DISTRACTORS (OK) 85 F 2 N REVIEWED (OK) 86 H 3 N U Not SRO only. WROTE NEW QUESTION (OK) 87 H 3 N S REVIEWED (OK) 88 F 2 N S MINOR CHANGES 89 H 2 N S (OK)

1.

2.

3. Psychometric Flaws

4. Job Content Flaws

5. Other

6.

7.

8.

Q# LOK LOD (F/H) (1-5) Stem Cues T/F Credo Partial Job-Minutia

1 Back-Q=

SRO B/M/N U/EIS Explanation Focus Dist. Link units ward KIA Only 90 H 3 N S (OK) 91 H 2 X N S (OK) 92 F 3 N U .Two correct answers. B & D CHANGED DISTRACTORS A & B 93 H 2 X N U Not SRO. System knowledge only needed to answer question REWORDED STEM AND DISTRACTORS (OK)n 94 H 2 N (OK) 95 F 1 X X N U LOD (4 EDG are unavailable.... Distractor wording: Commence a shutdown... WROTE NEW QUESTION (OK) 96 1/2 ~ t::! 1! Distractors are conflicting. In one instance a distractor sa~s that a TSA is needed then in the same distractor states that the lead ma~ be lifted b~ a TSA. WILL BE RE-VISITED ON REVISED QUESTION ON 8/26 (OK) 97 H 2 X X N U Distractors A & B are not plausible. WROTE NEW QUESTION 98 F 3 X X N CHANGED SOME OF THE WORDING. 99 H 2 (OK) 100 F 2 X N .Y None of the distractors are Qlausible. MINOR CHANGES

1.

2.

3. Psychometric Flaws

4. Job Content Flaws

5. Other

6.

7.

8.

Q# LOK LOD (F/H) (1-5) Stem Cues T/F Credo Partial Job-Minutia

1 Back-Q=

SRO B/M/N U/EIS Explanation Focus Dist. Link units ward KIA Only 90 H 3 N S (OK) 91 H 2 X N S (OK) 92 F 3 N U .Two correct answers. B&D CHANGED DISTRACTORS A & B 93 H 2 X N U Not SRO. System knowledge only needed to answer question REWORDED STEM AND DISTRACTORS (OK)n 94 H 2 N (OK) 95 F 1 X X N U LOD (4 EDG are unavailable.... Distractor wording: Commence a shutdown... WROTE NEW QUESTION (OK) 96 1/2 ~ t::! 1! Distractors are conflicting. In one instance a distractor sa~s that a TSA is needed then in the same distractor states that the lead ma~ be lifted b~ a TSA. WILL BE RE-VISITED ON REVISED QUESTION ON 8/26 (OK) 97 H 2 X X N U Distractors A & B are not plausible. WROTE NEW QUESTION 98 F 3 X X N CHANGED SOME OF THE WORDING. 99 H 2 (OK) 100 F 2 X N U None of the distractors are Qlausible. MINOR CHANGES}}

ML100670332

Text

Navigation menu

Search